CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'North American Industry Classification System'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 224

Center for Economic Studies - 136

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 130

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 122

Standard Industrial Classification - 113

Internal Revenue Service - 102

National Science Foundation - 100

Ordinary Least Squares - 95

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 93

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 93

Employer Identification Numbers - 92

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 91

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 90

Economic Census - 90

National Bureau of Economic Research - 86

Business Register - 85

Total Factor Productivity - 75

Census of Manufactures - 72

Disclosure Review Board - 64

American Community Survey - 62

Current Population Survey - 58

Business Dynamics Statistics - 58

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 56

Census Bureau Business Register - 54

County Business Patterns - 53

Federal Reserve Bank - 52

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 51

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 49

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 43

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 41

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 41

Decennial Census - 37

Research Data Center - 36

Protected Identification Key - 35

Social Security Administration - 35

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 34

University of Chicago - 34

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 33

Service Annual Survey - 30

Special Sworn Status - 30

Social Security Number - 29

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 29

Technical Services - 28

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 28

Social Security - 28

Cobb-Douglas - 27

Federal Reserve System - 27

Retail Trade - 26

Longitudinal Research Database - 26

Unemployment Insurance - 25

Harmonized System - 25

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 25

Patent and Trademark Office - 24

Accommodation and Food Services - 24

American Economic Review - 24

Wholesale Trade - 23

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Kauffman Foundation - 23

Department of Homeland Security - 22

Core Based Statistical Area - 22

Generalized Method of Moments - 21

International Trade Research Report - 21

Survey of Business Owners - 20

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 20

2010 Census - 20

North American Industry Classi - 20

Company Organization Survey - 19

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 19

Employer Characteristics File - 19

Small Business Administration - 19

W-2 - 18

Annual Business Survey - 18

Individual Characteristics File - 18

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 18

Environmental Protection Agency - 18

World Bank - 18

Arts, Entertainment - 17

Department of Labor - 17

Occupational Employment Statistics - 17

Local Employment Dynamics - 17

Postal Service - 17

University of Maryland - 17

Cornell University - 16

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 16

Public Administration - 15

Employment History File - 15

World Trade Organization - 15

Business Employment Dynamics - 15

Journal of Economic Literature - 15

Securities and Exchange Commission - 14

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

Department of Economics - 14

Energy Information Administration - 14

NBER Summer Institute - 14

New York University - 14

Sloan Foundation - 14

Review of Economics and Statistics - 14

Department of Commerce - 14

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Master Address File - 13

Agriculture, Forestry - 13

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 13

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 13

Boston College - 13

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 12

IQR - 12

Office of Personnel Management - 12

COVID-19 - 12

LEHD Program - 12

Board of Governors - 12

Commodity Flow Survey - 12

University of Michigan - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 12

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 12

Health Care and Social Assistance - 12

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 12

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 12

American Economic Association - 12

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 12

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 12

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 12

Journal of Political Economy - 12

Permanent Plant Number - 12

Census of Retail Trade - 11

Initial Public Offering - 11

European Union - 11

Establishment Micro Properties - 11

University of California Los Angeles - 11

Journal of Labor Economics - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 10

Educational Services - 10

Person Validation System - 10

United States Census Bureau - 10

Stanford University - 10

United Nations - 10

National Establishment Time Series - 10

Department of Energy - 10

Department of Agriculture - 10

University of Toronto - 10

Current Employment Statistics - 10

Business Services - 10

State Energy Data System - 10

Statistics Canada - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 9

CDF - 9

Composite Person Record - 9

Cumulative Density Function - 9

Professional Services - 9

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 9

Bureau of Labor - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Geographic Information Systems - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Computer Network Use Supplement - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

MIT Press - 9

Electronic Data Interchange - 9

Journal of International Economics - 9

Department of Defense - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 8

IBM - 8

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 8

Foreign Direct Investment - 8

Duke University - 8

Census Numident - 8

Economic Research Service - 8

Harvard University - 8

Harvard Business School - 8

George Mason University - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

Federal Trade Commission - 8

Limited Liability Company - 8

Review of Economic Studies - 8

Federal Tax Information - 8

Business Master File - 8

Census of Services - 7

Legal Form of Organization - 7

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 7

Fabricated Metal Products - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

AKM - 7

General Accounting Office - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

International Trade Commission - 7

TFPQ - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

Columbia University - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Probability Density Function - 7

PSID - 7

COMPUSTAT - 7

International Standard Industrial Classification - 7

National Institutes of Health - 6

National Employer Survey - 6

Nonemployer Statistics - 6

European Commission - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 6

Heckscher-Ohlin - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Business Formation Statistics - 6

Linear Probability Models - 6

UC Berkeley - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Data Management System - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Employer-Household Dynamics - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Kauffman Firm Survey - 6

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

New York Times - 6

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 6

United States Patent - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

Research and Development - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Federal Register - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

Supreme Court - 5

IZA - 5

SSA Numident - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 5

Retirement History Survey - 5

TFPR - 5

1940 Census - 5

Princeton University Press - 5

JOLTS - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Wal-Mart - 5

Georgetown University - 5

Cambridge University Press - 5

Longitudinal Data Base - 5

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 5

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

MAF-ARF - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

HHS - 4

E32 - 4

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Carnegie Mellon University - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Census Industry Code - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

National Research Council - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

CAAA - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

PAOC - 4

Value Added - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

VAR - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Penn State University - 3

Princeton University - 3

Washington University - 3

2SLS - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

WECD - 3

John Haltiwanger - 29

Lucia Foster - 23

Javier Miranda - 20

Ron Jarmin - 17

Lars Vilhuber - 16

Nathan Goldschlag - 13

Emin Dinlersoz - 11

Catherine Buffington - 11

John M. Abowd - 11

Cheryl Grim - 10

Peter Schott - 10

Martha Stinson - 9

Fariha Kamal - 9

Zoltan Wolf - 8

Teresa C. Fort - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Shawn Klimek - 8

Henry Hyatt - 7

Nicholas Bloom - 7

Erik Brynjolfsson - 7

Nikolas Zolas - 7

Gale Boyd - 7

J. David Brown - 7

Stephen Redding - 7

Jay Stewart - 6

Christopher Goetz - 6

Zachary Kroff - 6

Matthias Kehrig - 6

Scott Ohlmacher - 6

Erika McEntarfer - 6

Jerome P. Reiter - 6

Xavier Giroud - 6

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 5

G. Jacob Blackwood - 5

Kristin Sandusky - 5

Steven J. Davis - 5

J. Daniel Kim - 5

John S. Earle - 5

Ronald J Shadbegian - 5

Justin Pierce - 5

David L. Rigby - 5

Thomas Kemeny - 5

Abigail Cooke - 5

C.J. Krizan - 5

J. Bradford Jensen - 5

Randy Becker - 5

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Lawrence Warren - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Mark J. Kutzbach - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Matthew Doolin - 4

James R. Spletzer - 4

Nicolas Vincent - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Andrew S. Green - 4

Kevin Rinz - 4

Benjamin Pugsley - 4

Kristin McCue - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

B.K. Atrostic - 4

Joseph Staudt - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Maggie R. Jones - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Stephen Tibbets - 3

Moises Yi - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Robert Seamans - 3

Itay Saporta-Eksten - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Wei Ouyang - 3

Hyunseob Kim - 3

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 3

Mariko Sakakibara - 3

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Matthew D. Shapiro - 3

John J. Stevens - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Satkartar K. Kinney - 3

Holger M. Mueller - 3

Bryce Stephens - 3

Sang V Nguyen - 3

manufacturing - 85

market - 83

employ - 83

employed - 83

labor - 77

workforce - 77

industrial - 73

sector - 69

macroeconomic - 67

growth - 66

production - 65

recession - 62

employee - 59

econometric - 59

revenue - 58

enterprise - 57

payroll - 56

sale - 53

gdp - 52

company - 50

entrepreneurship - 49

export - 49

earnings - 48

expenditure - 48

economist - 48

investment - 48

estimating - 46

entrepreneur - 44

economically - 44

innovation - 43

survey - 42

demand - 37

establishment - 33

worker - 32

agency - 30

report - 30

manufacturer - 30

quarterly - 30

organizational - 30

venture - 29

exporter - 29

patent - 27

import - 27

endogeneity - 27

employment growth - 27

aggregate - 26

occupation - 25

acquisition - 25

trend - 24

statistical - 24

technological - 24

job - 24

entrepreneurial - 23

spillover - 23

produce - 23

wholesale - 22

monopolistic - 22

workplace - 22

hiring - 21

salary - 21

proprietorship - 21

estimation - 21

finance - 21

disclosure - 20

census employment - 20

multinational - 20

data - 20

incorporated - 19

census bureau - 19

inventory - 19

respondent - 19

employment statistics - 19

investor - 19

financial - 19

heterogeneity - 19

earner - 18

proprietor - 18

efficiency - 18

patenting - 18

microdata - 18

corporation - 17

data census - 17

employment data - 17

incentive - 17

tariff - 17

profit - 17

trading - 16

immigrant - 16

productivity growth - 16

metropolitan - 16

productive - 16

warehousing - 15

census data - 15

labor statistics - 15

importer - 15

competitor - 15

innovate - 15

employment dynamics - 15

specialization - 15

technology - 15

accounting - 15

commerce - 14

retailer - 14

retail - 14

unemployed - 14

commodity - 14

exporting - 14

impact - 14

innovative - 14

leverage - 14

regional - 14

labor productivity - 14

ethnicity - 14

industry productivity - 14

economic census - 13

population - 13

corporate - 13

record - 13

regress - 13

hire - 13

exogeneity - 13

consumption - 13

datasets - 13

longitudinal - 13

merger - 12

irs - 12

research census - 12

founder - 12

growth productivity - 12

factory - 12

researcher - 12

stock - 12

emission - 12

startup - 12

geographically - 12

database - 11

subsidiary - 11

shipment - 11

investing - 11

invest - 11

minority - 11

region - 11

profitability - 11

outsourced - 11

relocation - 11

outsourcing - 11

declining - 11

decline - 11

epa - 11

estimates employment - 11

employment estimates - 11

cost - 11

diversification - 11

work census - 10

country - 10

labor markets - 10

price - 10

sourcing - 10

financing - 10

equity - 10

subsidy - 10

oligopolistic - 10

invention - 10

area - 10

layoff - 10

shock - 10

development - 10

immigration - 10

industry wages - 10

monopolistically - 10

rent - 10

industry concentration - 10

consumer - 10

business data - 10

opportunity - 9

earn - 9

information census - 9

international trade - 9

firms export - 9

exported - 9

imported - 9

census survey - 9

competitiveness - 9

prospect - 9

wages productivity - 9

socioeconomic - 9

ownership - 9

decade - 9

sectoral - 9

imputation - 9

tenure - 9

employing - 9

energy - 9

productivity measures - 9

ethnic - 9

regulation - 9

coverage - 9

turnover - 9

employment count - 9

employer household - 9

longitudinal employer - 9

productivity estimates - 9

productivity dispersion - 8

warehouse - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employee data - 8

disparity - 8

effect wages - 8

employment earnings - 8

loan - 8

debt - 8

funding - 8

innovating - 8

rural - 8

depreciation - 8

wage growth - 8

product - 8

research - 8

strategic - 8

hispanic - 8

firms trade - 8

federal - 8

firms grow - 8

good - 8

residential - 8

regressing - 8

firms productivity - 8

migrant - 8

supplier - 8

geography - 8

analysis - 8

econometrician - 8

regional economic - 8

use census - 8

regression - 8

pollution - 8

spending - 7

executive - 7

measures productivity - 7

nonemployer businesses - 7

unemployment rates - 7

union - 7

rates employment - 7

technology adoption - 7

importing - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

innovator - 7

developed - 7

patented - 7

firms young - 7

bank - 7

custom - 7

firms import - 7

acquirer - 7

fuel - 7

electricity - 7

state - 7

employment wages - 7

larger firms - 7

city - 7

firm dynamics - 7

corp - 7

average - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

expense - 7

discrimination - 7

housing - 7

study - 7

worker demographics - 7

geographic - 7

healthcare - 7

manager - 7

industries estimate - 7

management - 7

trends employment - 7

workforce indicators - 7

reporting - 7

agriculture - 7

industry employment - 7

businesses census - 7

aggregation - 7

statistician - 7

insurance - 7

environmental - 7

consolidated - 6

department - 6

merchandise - 6

store - 6

productivity analysis - 6

filing - 6

2010 census - 6

trader - 6

firms patents - 6

firm innovation - 6

disadvantaged - 6

younger firms - 6

growth employment - 6

migration - 6

relocate - 6

foreign - 6

globalization - 6

woman - 6

endogenous - 6

employment trends - 6

tax - 6

firms size - 6

conglomerate - 6

pricing - 6

productivity increases - 6

startup firms - 6

wage differences - 6

renewable - 6

downturn - 6

productivity wage - 6

share - 6

lending - 6

recession employment - 6

clerical - 6

census business - 6

health insurance - 6

buyer - 6

confidentiality - 6

inference - 6

volatility - 6

estimator - 6

wage gap - 5

associate - 5

institutional - 5

sector productivity - 5

businesses grow - 5

effects employment - 5

welfare - 5

compensation - 5

recessionary - 5

risk - 5

disaster - 5

hurricane - 5

earnings employees - 5

fund - 5

regressors - 5

patents firms - 5

firm patenting - 5

native - 5

patenting firms - 5

wage regressions - 5

firms employment - 5

shift - 5

factor productivity - 5

location - 5

worker wages - 5

workers earnings - 5

contract - 5

plant investment - 5

business startups - 5

level productivity - 5

segregation - 5

neighborhood - 5

residence - 5

industry growth - 5

reallocation productivity - 5

immigrant entrepreneurs - 5

career - 5

unobserved - 5

bias - 5

wage effects - 5

premium - 5

borrowing - 5

wealth - 5

energy prices - 5

energy efficiency - 5

matching - 5

medicare - 5

retirement - 5

classified - 5

classification - 5

marketing - 5

productivity size - 5

productivity firms - 5

manufacturing productivity - 5

econometrically - 5

saving - 5

shareholder - 5

industrialized - 5

computer - 5

measures employment - 5

regulatory - 5

efficient - 5

insured - 5

firms census - 5

aging - 5

fluctuation - 5

information - 5

privacy - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

trade models - 5

model - 5

foreign trade - 5

pollutant - 5

plants industry - 5

polluting - 5

retailing - 5

university - 4

customer - 4

dispersion productivity - 4

productivity variation - 4

wages employment - 4

state employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

assessed - 4

export market - 4

asset - 4

prevalence - 4

oligopoly - 4

rates productivity - 4

indian - 4

firms age - 4

employment production - 4

productivity shocks - 4

lender - 4

banking - 4

mortgage - 4

migrate - 4

immigrant workers - 4

exporting firms - 4

multinational firms - 4

midwest - 4

diversify - 4

imputed - 4

census disclosure - 4

estimates production - 4

increase employment - 4

taxation - 4

urban - 4

firm growth - 4

growth firms - 4

substitute - 4

advantage - 4

competitive - 4

diversified - 4

industry variation - 4

plant productivity - 4

wage industries - 4

creditor - 4

electricity prices - 4

earnings inequality - 4

managerial - 4

pension - 4

utilization - 4

industrial classification - 4

productivity differences - 4

earnings workers - 4

tech - 4

employment distribution - 4

census use - 4

employment measures - 4

agricultural - 4

trends labor - 4

employment recession - 4

economic statistics - 4

enrollment - 4

insurance coverage - 4

surveys censuses - 4

census research - 4

linked census - 4

productivity plants - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

publicly - 4

regional industry - 4

employment flows - 4

costs pollution - 4

pollution abatement - 4

regional industries - 4

graduate - 3

fiscal - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

grocery - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

mandate - 3

provided census - 3

employed census - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

downstream - 3

trade costs - 3

security - 3

productivity impacts - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

borrower - 3

partnership - 3

relocating - 3

migrating - 3

restaurant - 3

poverty - 3

poorer - 3

job growth - 3

policymakers - 3

impact employment - 3

capital productivity - 3

plants firms - 3

externality - 3

segregated - 3

racial - 3

resident - 3

enforcement - 3

wage data - 3

discrepancy - 3

wage changes - 3

pandemic - 3

recession exposure - 3

classifying - 3

policy - 3

equilibrium - 3

local economic - 3

takeover - 3

technical - 3

franchising - 3

rurality - 3

innovation productivity - 3

elasticity - 3

establishments data - 3

census years - 3

mexican - 3

startups employees - 3

business survival - 3

gender - 3

indicator - 3

exogenous - 3

transition - 3

investment productivity - 3

earnings growth - 3

export growth - 3

citizen - 3

census file - 3

inflation - 3

imputation model - 3

mobility - 3

commute - 3

restructuring - 3

liquidation - 3

forecast - 3

analyst - 3

locality - 3

supermarket - 3

refugee - 3

performance - 3

latino - 3

valuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

employment changes - 3

coverage employer - 3

statistical agencies - 3

environmental regulation - 3

abatement expenditures - 3

environmental expenditures - 3

capital - 3

cluster - 3

purchase - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 367


  • Working Paper

    Double-Pane Glass Ceiling: Commercial Engagement and the Female-Male Earnings Gap for Faculty

    September 2025

    Authors: Joseph Staudt

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-68

    I use administrative data from universities (UMETRICS) linked to the universe of confidential W-2 and 1040-C tax records to measure faculty commercial engagement and its role in female-male earnings gaps. Female faculty are 20 percentage points less likely to engage commercially, with the entire gap driven by self-employment. The raw earnings gap is $63,000 on a base of $162,000 and non-university earnings account for $18,000 (29 percent) of this total. Thus, while university pay explains most of the gap, commercial engagement substantially amplifies it. Earnings gaps appear in all components of non-university pay ' self-employment, and work for incumbent, young/startup, high-tech, and non-high-tech firms ' and remain large, though attenuated, after controlling publications, patents, field, university, scientific resources, age, marital status, childbearing, and demographics. Gaps widen as faculty move up the earnings distribution, and commercial engagement becomes a larger contributor. Men and women engage with similar industries, but men earn more in all shared industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    'Class of Customer' Question from the US Economic Census

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-66

    The Economic Census (EC) collects detailed information on the class of customers served by establishments'for example, the share of an establishment's sales to other businesses or to government entities'for a subset of sectors in the economy. In this paper, we evaluate the data from the 'Class of Customer' question from the EC, with a particular focus on sales to the government. These data have seldom been used in empirical research and are unique in that they enable researchers to link establishment-level Census data with information on government procurement. We compile and analyze large volumes of publicly available tabulated data about the class of customer question over time. Using these data, we document three main findings. First, total sales to government from establishments covered by the class of customer question account for approximately 4 percent of GDP'just under half of total government procurement as measured in the national accounts. Second, the sectoral distribution of government expenditure is significantly different from that of private sector spending. Certain industries, such as Construction and Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services, account for a much larger share of government expenditure relative to private sector expenditure. Third, sales to the government make up a substantial portion of total sales in several sectors'for instance, 70 percent in Facilities Support Services, 30 percent in Waste Treatment and Disposal, and 17 percent in Construction. Finally, we use the microdata to examine nonresponse rates to the class of customer question across establishments based on the number of employees.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Matching Compustat Data to the Longitudinal Business Database, 1976-2020

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-65

    This paper details the methodology for creating an updated Compustat-Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) bridge, facilitating linkage between company identifiers in Compustat and firm identifiers in the LBD. In addition to data from Compustat, we incorporate historical data on public companies from various public and private sources, including information on executive names. Our methodology involves a series of stages using fuzzy name and address matching, including EIN, telephone number, and industry code matching. Qualified researchers with approved proposals can access this bridge though the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers. The Compustat-SSL bridge serves as a crucial resource for longitudinal studies on U.S. businesses, corporate governance, and executive compensation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    National Chains and Trends in Retail Productivity Dispersion

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-64

    Productivity dispersion within an industry is an important characteristic of the business environment, potentially reflecting factors such as market structure, production technologies, and reallocation frictions. The retail trade sector saw significant changes between 1987 and 2017, and dispersion statistics can help characterize how it evolved over this period. In this paper, we shed light on this transformation by developing public-use Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP) data for the retail sector for 1987 through 2017. We find that from 1987 through 2017, dispersion increased between retail stores at the bottom and middle of the productivity distribution. However, when we weight stores by employment dispersion, the middle of the distribution is lower initially and decreases over time. These patterns are consistent with a retail landscape featuring more and more activity taking place in chain stores with similar productivity. Firm-based dispersion measures exhibit a similar pattern. Further investigation reveals that there is substantial heterogeneity in dispersion levels across industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Job Tasks, Worker Skills, and Productivity

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-63

    We present new empirical evidence suggesting that we can better understand productivity dispersion across businesses by accounting for differences in how tasks, skills, and occupations are organized. This aligns with growing attention to the task content of production. We link establishment-level data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey with productivity data from the Census Bureau's manufacturing surveys. Our analysis reveals strong relationships between establishment productivity and task, skill, and occupation inputs. These relationships are highly nonlinear and vary by industry. When we account for these patterns, we can explain a substantial share of productivity dispersion across establishments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Owners and the Self-Employed: 33 Million (and Counting!)

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-60

    Entrepreneurs are known to be key drivers of economic growth, and the rise of online platforms and the broader 'gig economy' has led self-employment to surge in recent decades. Yet the young and small businesses associated with this activity are often absent from economic data. In this paper, we explore a novel longitudinal dataset that covers the owners of tens of millions of the smallest businesses: those without employees. We produce three new sets of statistics on the rapidly growing set of nonemployer businesses. First, we measure transitions between self-employment and wage and salary jobs. Second, we describe nonemployer business entry and exit, as well as transitions between legal form (e.g., sole proprietorship to S corporation). Finally, we link owners to their nonemployer businesses and examine the dynamics of business ownership.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance, Wage Pass-Through, and Endogenous Take-Up

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-59

    This paper studies how unemployment insurance (UI) generosity affects reservation wages, re-employment wages, and benefit take-up. Using Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) data, we estimate a cross-sectional elasticity of reservation wages with respect to weekly UI benefits of 0.014. Exploiting state variation in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) intensity and the timing of federal supplements, we find that expanded benefits during COVID-19 increased reservation wages by 8'12 percent. Using CPS rotation data, we also document a 9 percent rise in re-employment wages for UI-eligible workers relative to ineligible workers. Over the same period, the UI take-up rate rose from roughly 30 to 40 percent; Probit estimates indicate that higher benefit levels, rather than changes in observables, account for this increase. A directed search model with an endogenous filing decision replicates these facts: generosity primarily operates through the extensive margin of take-up, which mutes the pass-through from benefits to wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Childcare Establishments

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-53

    Childcare is essential for working families, yet it remains increasingly unaffordable and inaccessible for parents and offers poverty-level wages to many employees. While research suggests minimum wage policies may improve the welfare of low-wage workers, there is also evidence they may increase firm exits, especially among smaller, low-profit firms, which could reduce access and harm consumer well-being. This study is the first to examine these trade-offs in the childcare industry, a labor-intensive, highly regulated sector where capital-labor substitution is limited, and to provide evidence on how minimum wage policies affect a dual-sector labor market in the U.S., where self-employed and waged providers serve overlapping markets. Using variation from state-level minimum wage increases between 1995 and 2019 and unique microdata, I implement a cross-state county border discontinuity design to estimate impacts on the stocks, flows, and composition of childcare establishments. I find that while county-level aggregate establishment stocks and employment remained stable, establishment-level turnover increased, and employment decreased. I reconcile these findings by showing that minimum wage increases prompted reallocation, with larger establishments in the waged-sector more likely to enter and less likely to exit, making this one of the first studies to link null aggregate effects to shifts in establishment composition. Finally, I show that minimum wage increases may negatively affect the self-employed sector, resulting in fewer owners with advanced degrees and more with only high school education. These findings suggest that minimum wage policies reshape who provides care in ways that could affect both quality and access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technifying Ventures

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-49

    How do advanced technology adoption and venture capital (VC) funding impact employment and growth? An analysis of data from the US Census Bureau suggests that while both advanced technology use and VC funding matter on their own for firm outcomes, their joint presence is most strongly correlated with higher employment levels. VC presence is linked with a high increase in employment, though primarily among a limited subset of firms. In contrast, technology adoption is associated with a smaller rise in employment, yet it influences a considerably larger number of firms. A model of startups is created, focusing on decisions to use advanced technology and seek VC funding. The model is compared with firm-level data on employment, advanced technology use, and VC investment. Several thought experiments are conducted using the model. Some experiments assess the importance of advanced technology and VC in the economy. Others examine the reallocation effects across firms with different technology choices and funding sources in response to shifts in taxes and subsidies.
    View Full Paper PDF