CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'North American Industry Classification System'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 230

Center for Economic Studies - 136

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 132

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 127

Standard Industrial Classification - 115

Internal Revenue Service - 105

National Science Foundation - 101

Ordinary Least Squares - 99

Employer Identification Numbers - 96

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 96

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 95

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 94

Economic Census - 93

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 91

National Bureau of Economic Research - 88

Business Register - 86

Total Factor Productivity - 76

Census of Manufactures - 73

American Community Survey - 67

Disclosure Review Board - 65

Business Dynamics Statistics - 59

Current Population Survey - 58

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 57

Census Bureau Business Register - 56

County Business Patterns - 54

Federal Reserve Bank - 53

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 51

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 49

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 44

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 41

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 41

Decennial Census - 37

Protected Identification Key - 36

Research Data Center - 36

Social Security Administration - 35

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 34

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 34

University of Chicago - 34

Special Sworn Status - 31

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 30

Service Annual Survey - 30

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 29

Social Security Number - 29

Federal Reserve System - 28

Cobb-Douglas - 28

Technical Services - 28

Social Security - 28

Unemployment Insurance - 26

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 26

Retail Trade - 26

Longitudinal Research Database - 26

Department of Homeland Security - 25

Patent and Trademark Office - 25

Harmonized System - 25

Wholesale Trade - 24

Accommodation and Food Services - 24

American Economic Review - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Kauffman Foundation - 23

Core Based Statistical Area - 22

2010 Census - 21

Generalized Method of Moments - 21

International Trade Research Report - 21

Environmental Protection Agency - 20

Employer Characteristics File - 20

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 20

Survey of Business Owners - 20

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 20

North American Industry Classi - 20

Individual Characteristics File - 19

World Bank - 19

Company Organization Survey - 19

Small Business Administration - 19

Department of Labor - 18

W-2 - 18

Annual Business Survey - 18

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 18

World Trade Organization - 17

Arts, Entertainment - 17

Occupational Employment Statistics - 17

Local Employment Dynamics - 17

Postal Service - 17

University of Maryland - 17

Securities and Exchange Commission - 16

Cornell University - 16

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 16

Energy Information Administration - 15

Department of Economics - 15

Public Administration - 15

Employment History File - 15

Business Employment Dynamics - 15

Journal of Economic Literature - 15

American Economic Association - 14

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 14

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

NBER Summer Institute - 14

New York University - 14

Sloan Foundation - 14

Review of Economics and Statistics - 14

Department of Commerce - 14

Journal of Political Economy - 13

COVID-19 - 13

IQR - 13

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 13

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 13

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Master Address File - 13

Agriculture, Forestry - 13

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 13

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 13

Boston College - 13

Establishment Micro Properties - 12

United Nations - 12

University of California Los Angeles - 12

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 12

Office of Personnel Management - 12

LEHD Program - 12

Board of Governors - 12

Commodity Flow Survey - 12

University of Michigan - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Health Care and Social Assistance - 12

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 12

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 12

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 12

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 12

Permanent Plant Number - 12

Business Services - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Department of Energy - 11

Census of Retail Trade - 11

Initial Public Offering - 11

European Union - 11

Journal of Labor Economics - 11

Professional Services - 10

Educational Services - 10

Person Validation System - 10

United States Census Bureau - 10

Stanford University - 10

National Establishment Time Series - 10

Department of Agriculture - 10

University of Toronto - 10

Current Employment Statistics - 10

State Energy Data System - 10

Statistics Canada - 10

Limited Liability Company - 9

Oil and Gas Extraction - 9

Standard Occupational Classification - 9

CDF - 9

Composite Person Record - 9

Cumulative Density Function - 9

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 9

Bureau of Labor - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Geographic Information Systems - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Computer Network Use Supplement - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

MIT Press - 9

Electronic Data Interchange - 9

Journal of International Economics - 9

AKM - 8

PSID - 8

Business Formation Statistics - 8

International Trade Commission - 8

Department of Defense - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 8

IBM - 8

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 8

Foreign Direct Investment - 8

Duke University - 8

Census Numident - 8

Economic Research Service - 8

Harvard University - 8

Harvard Business School - 8

George Mason University - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

Federal Trade Commission - 8

Review of Economic Studies - 8

Federal Tax Information - 8

Business Master File - 8

Linear Probability Models - 7

Guzman and Stern - 7

Employer-Household Dynamics - 7

Census of Services - 7

Legal Form of Organization - 7

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 7

Fabricated Metal Products - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

General Accounting Office - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

TFPQ - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

Columbia University - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Probability Density Function - 7

COMPUSTAT - 7

International Standard Industrial Classification - 7

Center for Research in Security Prices - 6

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 6

COVID - 6

Supreme Court - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

National Employer Survey - 6

Nonemployer Statistics - 6

European Commission - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 6

Heckscher-Ohlin - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Retirement History Survey - 6

UC Berkeley - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Georgetown University - 6

Data Management System - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Kauffman Firm Survey - 6

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

New York Times - 6

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 6

University of California - 5

Research and Development - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Federal Register - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

IZA - 5

SSA Numident - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 5

TFPR - 5

1940 Census - 5

Princeton University Press - 5

JOLTS - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Wal-Mart - 5

Cambridge University Press - 5

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 5

2SLS - 4

University of Texas - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

MAF-ARF - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Hypothesis 2 - 4

HHS - 4

E32 - 4

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Carnegie Mellon University - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Census Industry Code - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

DOB - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

National Research Council - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

CAAA - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

PAOC - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

ASEC - 3

Value Added - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

VAR - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Penn State University - 3

Princeton University - 3

Washington University - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

WECD - 3

John Haltiwanger - 30

Lucia Foster - 23

Javier Miranda - 20

Ron Jarmin - 17

Lars Vilhuber - 16

Emin Dinlersoz - 13

Nathan Goldschlag - 13

Catherine Buffington - 11

John M. Abowd - 11

Fariha Kamal - 10

Cheryl Grim - 10

Peter Schott - 10

Martha Stinson - 9

Zoltan Wolf - 8

Teresa C. Fort - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Shawn Klimek - 8

Zachary Kroff - 7

Henry Hyatt - 7

Nicholas Bloom - 7

Erik Brynjolfsson - 7

Nikolas Zolas - 7

Gale Boyd - 7

J. David Brown - 7

Stephen Redding - 7

Jay Stewart - 6

Christopher Goetz - 6

Matthias Kehrig - 6

Scott Ohlmacher - 6

Erika McEntarfer - 6

Jerome P. Reiter - 6

Xavier Giroud - 6

Moises Yi - 5

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 5

G. Jacob Blackwood - 5

Kristin Sandusky - 5

Steven J. Davis - 5

J. Daniel Kim - 5

John S. Earle - 5

Ronald J Shadbegian - 5

Justin Pierce - 5

David L. Rigby - 5

Thomas Kemeny - 5

Abigail Cooke - 5

C.J. Krizan - 5

J. Bradford Jensen - 5

Randy Becker - 5

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Lawrence Warren - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Mark J. Kutzbach - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Matthew Doolin - 4

James R. Spletzer - 4

Nicolas Vincent - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Andrew S. Green - 4

Kevin Rinz - 4

Benjamin Pugsley - 4

Kristin McCue - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

B.K. Atrostic - 4

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Joseph Staudt - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Maggie R. Jones - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Stephen Tibbets - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Timothy Dunne - 3

Robert Seamans - 3

Itay Saporta-Eksten - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Wei Ouyang - 3

Hyunseob Kim - 3

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 3

Mariko Sakakibara - 3

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Matthew D. Shapiro - 3

John J. Stevens - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Satkartar K. Kinney - 3

Holger M. Mueller - 3

Bryce Stephens - 3

Sang V Nguyen - 3

employ - 86

employed - 85

market - 85

manufacturing - 85

workforce - 80

labor - 78

industrial - 74

macroeconomic - 70

sector - 70

growth - 67

production - 66

recession - 62

econometric - 61

revenue - 59

employee - 59

enterprise - 58

payroll - 57

gdp - 56

sale - 56

export - 51

entrepreneurship - 51

company - 51

earnings - 50

investment - 49

economist - 49

estimating - 48

expenditure - 48

entrepreneur - 46

economically - 46

innovation - 44

survey - 42

demand - 37

worker - 34

establishment - 33

report - 31

organizational - 31

exporter - 30

agency - 30

venture - 30

manufacturer - 30

quarterly - 30

import - 28

patent - 28

acquisition - 27

endogeneity - 27

employment growth - 27

occupation - 26

aggregate - 26

entrepreneurial - 25

job - 25

trend - 24

statistical - 24

technological - 24

hiring - 23

spillover - 23

produce - 23

estimation - 22

finance - 22

wholesale - 22

monopolistic - 22

workplace - 22

multinational - 21

disclosure - 21

salary - 21

proprietorship - 21

heterogeneity - 20

inventory - 20

financial - 20

incorporated - 20

census employment - 20

data - 20

earner - 19

patenting - 19

efficiency - 19

proprietor - 19

census bureau - 19

respondent - 19

employment statistics - 19

investor - 19

tariff - 18

microdata - 18

productive - 17

corporation - 17

data census - 17

employment data - 17

incentive - 17

profit - 17

specialization - 16

accounting - 16

trading - 16

immigrant - 16

productivity growth - 16

metropolitan - 16

regress - 15

unemployed - 15

commerce - 15

exporting - 15

warehousing - 15

census data - 15

labor statistics - 15

importer - 15

competitor - 15

innovate - 15

employment dynamics - 15

technology - 15

corporate - 14

exogeneity - 14

record - 14

retailer - 14

retail - 14

commodity - 14

impact - 14

innovative - 14

leverage - 14

regional - 14

labor productivity - 14

ethnicity - 14

industry productivity - 14

merger - 13

irs - 13

economic census - 13

population - 13

stock - 13

hire - 13

consumption - 13

startup - 13

geographically - 13

datasets - 13

longitudinal - 13

region - 12

profitability - 12

diversification - 12

subsidiary - 12

shipment - 12

relocation - 12

research census - 12

founder - 12

growth productivity - 12

factory - 12

researcher - 12

emission - 12

shock - 11

oligopolistic - 11

equity - 11

invention - 11

layoff - 11

database - 11

investing - 11

invest - 11

minority - 11

immigration - 11

outsourced - 11

outsourcing - 11

declining - 11

decline - 11

epa - 11

estimates employment - 11

employment estimates - 11

cost - 11

exported - 10

socioeconomic - 10

earn - 10

work census - 10

country - 10

labor markets - 10

price - 10

sourcing - 10

financing - 10

subsidy - 10

area - 10

development - 10

industry wages - 10

monopolistically - 10

rent - 10

industry concentration - 10

consumer - 10

business data - 10

regressing - 9

strategic - 9

econometrician - 9

good - 9

innovating - 9

disparity - 9

opportunity - 9

information census - 9

international trade - 9

firms export - 9

imported - 9

census survey - 9

competitiveness - 9

prospect - 9

wages productivity - 9

ownership - 9

decade - 9

sectoral - 9

imputation - 9

tenure - 9

employing - 9

energy - 9

productivity measures - 9

ethnic - 9

regulation - 9

coverage - 9

turnover - 9

employment count - 9

employer household - 9

longitudinal employer - 9

productivity estimates - 9

discrimination - 8

housing - 8

aggregation - 8

corp - 8

patented - 8

fuel - 8

unemployment rates - 8

reporting - 8

productivity dispersion - 8

warehouse - 8

nonemployer businesses - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employee data - 8

effect wages - 8

employment earnings - 8

loan - 8

debt - 8

funding - 8

rural - 8

depreciation - 8

wage growth - 8

bank - 8

product - 8

research - 8

hispanic - 8

firms trade - 8

federal - 8

firms grow - 8

residential - 8

firms productivity - 8

migrant - 8

supplier - 8

geography - 8

analysis - 8

regional economic - 8

use census - 8

regression - 8

pollution - 8

shift - 7

foreign - 7

merchandise - 7

trader - 7

innovation patenting - 7

migration - 7

relocate - 7

tax - 7

spending - 7

executive - 7

measures productivity - 7

union - 7

rates employment - 7

technology adoption - 7

importing - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

innovator - 7

developed - 7

firms young - 7

custom - 7

firms import - 7

acquirer - 7

electricity - 7

state - 7

employment wages - 7

larger firms - 7

city - 7

firm dynamics - 7

average - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

expense - 7

startup firms - 7

study - 7

worker demographics - 7

geographic - 7

healthcare - 7

manager - 7

industries estimate - 7

management - 7

trends employment - 7

workforce indicators - 7

agriculture - 7

industry employment - 7

businesses census - 7

statistician - 7

insurance - 7

environmental - 7

segregation - 6

neighborhood - 6

welfare - 6

compensation - 6

unobserved - 6

consolidated - 6

department - 6

store - 6

productivity analysis - 6

filing - 6

2010 census - 6

firms patents - 6

firm innovation - 6

disadvantaged - 6

younger firms - 6

growth employment - 6

globalization - 6

woman - 6

endogenous - 6

employment trends - 6

firms size - 6

conglomerate - 6

business startups - 6

pricing - 6

productivity increases - 6

wage differences - 6

renewable - 6

downturn - 6

productivity wage - 6

share - 6

lending - 6

recession employment - 6

clerical - 6

census business - 6

health insurance - 6

buyer - 6

confidentiality - 6

inference - 6

volatility - 6

estimator - 6

employment distribution - 5

forecast - 5

diversified - 5

entry productivity - 5

employment flows - 5

wage gap - 5

associate - 5

institutional - 5

sector productivity - 5

businesses grow - 5

effects employment - 5

recessionary - 5

risk - 5

disaster - 5

hurricane - 5

earnings employees - 5

fund - 5

regressors - 5

patents firms - 5

firm patenting - 5

native - 5

patenting firms - 5

wage regressions - 5

firms employment - 5

banking - 5

factor productivity - 5

location - 5

worker wages - 5

workers earnings - 5

contract - 5

plant investment - 5

level productivity - 5

residence - 5

industry growth - 5

reallocation productivity - 5

immigrant entrepreneurs - 5

career - 5

bias - 5

wage effects - 5

premium - 5

borrowing - 5

wealth - 5

energy prices - 5

energy efficiency - 5

matching - 5

medicare - 5

retirement - 5

classified - 5

classification - 5

marketing - 5

productivity size - 5

productivity firms - 5

manufacturing productivity - 5

econometrically - 5

saving - 5

shareholder - 5

industrialized - 5

computer - 5

measures employment - 5

regulatory - 5

efficient - 5

insured - 5

firms census - 5

aging - 5

fluctuation - 5

information - 5

privacy - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

trade models - 5

model - 5

foreign trade - 5

pollutant - 5

plants industry - 5

polluting - 5

retailing - 5

segregated - 4

poverty - 4

impact employment - 4

analyst - 4

exporters multinationals - 4

university - 4

customer - 4

dispersion productivity - 4

productivity variation - 4

wages employment - 4

state employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

assessed - 4

advancement - 4

export market - 4

asset - 4

prevalence - 4

oligopoly - 4

rates productivity - 4

indian - 4

firms age - 4

employment production - 4

productivity shocks - 4

lender - 4

mortgage - 4

migrate - 4

immigrant workers - 4

exporting firms - 4

multinational firms - 4

midwest - 4

diversify - 4

imputed - 4

census disclosure - 4

estimates production - 4

increase employment - 4

taxation - 4

urban - 4

firm growth - 4

growth firms - 4

substitute - 4

advantage - 4

competitive - 4

industry variation - 4

plant productivity - 4

wage industries - 4

transition - 4

creditor - 4

electricity prices - 4

earnings inequality - 4

managerial - 4

pension - 4

utilization - 4

industrial classification - 4

productivity differences - 4

earnings workers - 4

tech - 4

census use - 4

employment measures - 4

agricultural - 4

trends labor - 4

employment recession - 4

economic statistics - 4

enrollment - 4

insurance coverage - 4

surveys censuses - 4

census research - 4

linked census - 4

productivity plants - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

publicly - 4

regional industry - 4

costs pollution - 4

pollution abatement - 4

regional industries - 4

generation - 3

intergenerational - 3

parental - 3

renter - 3

taxable - 3

graduate - 3

fiscal - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

grocery - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

mandate - 3

provided census - 3

employed census - 3

downstream - 3

trade costs - 3

security - 3

productivity impacts - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

borrower - 3

partnership - 3

relocating - 3

migrating - 3

restaurant - 3

poorer - 3

job growth - 3

policymakers - 3

capital productivity - 3

plants firms - 3

externality - 3

racial - 3

resident - 3

enforcement - 3

wage data - 3

discrepancy - 3

wage changes - 3

pandemic - 3

recession exposure - 3

classifying - 3

policy - 3

equilibrium - 3

local economic - 3

takeover - 3

technical - 3

franchising - 3

rurality - 3

innovation productivity - 3

elasticity - 3

establishments data - 3

census years - 3

mexican - 3

startups employees - 3

business survival - 3

gender - 3

indicator - 3

exogenous - 3

investment productivity - 3

earnings growth - 3

export growth - 3

citizen - 3

census file - 3

inflation - 3

imputation model - 3

mobility - 3

commute - 3

restructuring - 3

liquidation - 3

locality - 3

supermarket - 3

refugee - 3

performance - 3

latino - 3

valuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

employment changes - 3

coverage employer - 3

statistical agencies - 3

environmental regulation - 3

abatement expenditures - 3

environmental expenditures - 3

capital - 3

cluster - 3

purchase - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 376


  • Working Paper

    How Do Neighborhoods and Firms Affect Intergenerational Mobility?

    March 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-18

    We use data from the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics linked to the 2000 Census to study intergenerational earnings mobility in the United States. We augment the standard intergenerational transmission model relating children's log earnings to those of their parent with an additional term representing mean log parent earnings in the childhood neighborhood. The between-neighborhood intergenerational relationship is twice as strong as the within-neighborhood relationship, even after adjusting for measurement error in parents' earnings. Moreover, mean earnings of the parents in a neighborhood capture over 80% of the variation in unrestricted neighborhood effects that reflect differences in 'absolute mobility'. Next, we use an AKM framework to decompose parents', children's, and neighboring parents' earnings into person effects and establishment premiums. Children's person effects are mainly influenced by parents' and neighbors' person effects, whereas children's establishment premiums are mainly influenced by parents' and neighbors' establishment premiums. These patterns point to separate channels for human capital and access to jobs in the intergenerational transmission process. Finally, we explore the implications for the Black-white earnings gap. Neighborhoods explain 30% of the Black-white gap in children's earnings conditional on parents' earnings, operating largely through gaps in average person effects. Conditional on neighborhood average earnings, children from neighborhoods with higher Black shares achieve higher adult earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trade and Welfare (across Local Labor Markets)

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-16

    What are the welfare implications of trade shocks? Theoretically, we provide a sufficient statistic that measures changes in welfare (to a first-order approximation) for the set of workers who start within a region, taking into account adjustment in frictional unemployment, labor force participation, the sectors to which workers apply for jobs, and the regions in which workers choose to live. Our theory is flexible; for instance, it allows for arbitrary heterogeneity in worker productivity and non-pecuniary returns (amenities) across unemployment, labor force non-participation, sectors, and regions. Empirically, we apply these insights to measure changes in welfare between 2000-2007 across workers who start in different commuting zones (CZs) in the U.S. in the year 2000. Finally, we identify the differential impact across CZs of a particular trade shock: granting China permanent normal trade relations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Establishment-Level Life Cycle and Analysts' Forecasts

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-12

    This paper examines how multi-unit firms' life-cycle stages affect analyst forecast accuracy. While prior studies focus on the firm-level life cycle, we utilize the Census data and focus on the establishment level. We find that analyst forecast accuracy is lower for multi-unit firms whose establishments are in different life-cycle stages than those in the same life-cycle stage. This finding suggests that the forecasting difficulty of more diversified firms can be attributed to the different life-cycle stages of each establishment. We also find that for firms whose units are in different stages, analyst forecast accuracy is lower if the establishments in earlier stages are larger (i.e., generate more revenue) than those in later stages. As a comparison, we estimate the life-cycle stages using firms' segment classifications in their 10-K filings. We find that analysts' forecast accuracy is lower when firms report fewer segments than the number of establishments, suggesting that aggregating more establishments for segment reporting could complicate analysts' forecasting. To our knowledge, this is the first study that focuses on the establishment-level life cycle. This study highlights that firm-level life cycles should not be taken without caution, as aggregating multiple units' life cycles may be misleading. In order to provide better forecasts to investors, analysts should have a deeper understanding of firms' subunits, especially when the establishments are in different life-cycle stages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expectations versus Reality in Business Formation

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-11

    Using administrative data on 17 million U.S. business applications linked to outcomes, we compare potential entrants' expectations about employer entry and first-year employment with realizations. On average, applicants overestimate employment, mainly because many expect to enter but do not. Among those who expect and achieve entry, employment is typically underestimated. Expected employment predicts entry and realized employment, but conditional on entry realized employment rises less than one-for-one with expectations. Expectation errors are highly heterogeneous and systematically related to application characteristics and local economic conditions, and they predict near-term employment outcomes. A parsimonious model with heterogeneous priors, learning, and pre-entry selection rationalizes these patterns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The U.S. Multinational Advantage during the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis: The Role of Services Trade

    January 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-04

    We document the augmenting role of services exports in U.S. multinationals' goods-export growth during the global financial crisis. Using newly linked data on U.S. firms' foreign sales of goods and services and a triple-difference identification strategy combined with propensity-score matching, we find that compared to multinationals that only export goods (mono-exporters), multinationals that also export services to the same destination (bi-exporters) experienced higher goods-export growth. This result is driven by sales of intellectual property rights related to industrial processes (e.g., patents, trademarks). We also find higher growth in bi-exporters' foreign affiliate services sales and domestic employment in services sectors. These results reveal a pivotal role of services exports in supporting foreign demand for U.S. goods during the crisis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Specialization in a Knowledge Economy

    December 2025

    Authors: Yueyuan Ma

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-77

    Using firm-level data from the US Census Longitudinal Business Database (LBD), this paper exhibits novel evidence about a wave of specialization experienced by US firms in the 1980s and 1990s. Specifically: (i) Firms, especially innovating ones, decreased production scope, i.e., the number of industries in which they produce. (ii) Innovation and production separated, with small firms specializing in innovation and large firms in production. Higher patent trading efficiency and stronger patent protection are proposed to explain these phenomena. An endogenous growth model is developed with potential mismatches between innovation and production. Calibrating the model suggests that increased trading efficiency and better patent protection can explain 20% of the observed production scope decrease and 108% of the innovation and production separation. They result in a 0.64 percent point increase in the annual economic growth rate. Empirical analyses provide evidence of causality from pro-patent reforms in the 1980s to the two specialization patterns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trapped or Transferred: Worker Mobility and Labor Market Power in the Energy Transition

    December 2025

    Authors: Minwoo Hyun

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-76

    Using matched employer-employee data covering 1.35 million US workers separated from the fossil fuel extraction industry between 1999 and 2019, I estimate how local fossil fuel labor demand shocks affect employment and earnings. Employment probabilities fall markedly after exposure, and earnings decline gradually over the first seven years with only partial recovery by ten years since exposure to the shocks. Workers who remain in the fossil fuel sector, disproportionately men in sector-specific roles, experience nearly twice the earnings losses of those who switch sectors, possibly due to limited occupational mobility. Among non-switchers, losses are larger in labor markets with high employer concentration, indicating that scarce outside options translate into lower reemployment wages and weaker bargaining positions. Geographic movers fare worse than stayers, reflecting negative selection (younger, lower-earning) and relocation to metropolitan areas where fossil fuel or low-skilled service sectors remain highly concentrated, leaving monopsony power intact.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measurement Matters: Financial Reporting and Productivity

    December 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-72

    We examine how differences in financial reporting practices shape firm productivity. Leveraging new audit questions in the U.S. Census Bureau's 2021 Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), and complementary tax return data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and detailed financial records from Sageworks, we find that (i) variation in reporting quality explains 10-20 percent of intra-industry total factor productivity dispersion, and (ii) evidence of complementarity between the effects of financial audits and management practices driving firm productivity. We then examine the underlying mechanisms. First, audits function as a managerial technology, improving the precision of internal information and raising efficiency, with stronger effects in competitive, low-margin industries and among younger firms. Second, exploiting cross-state variation in tax incentives, we show that audits constrain underreporting and mitigate the downward bias in measured productivity. Together, these results highlight the underrated importance of financial reporting quality driving firm productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Double-Pane Glass Ceiling: Commercial Engagement and the Female-Male Earnings Gap for Faculty

    September 2025

    Authors: Joseph Staudt

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-68

    I use administrative data from universities (UMETRICS) linked to the universe of confidential W-2 and 1040-C tax records to measure faculty commercial engagement and its role in female-male earnings gaps. Female faculty are 20 percentage points less likely to engage commercially, with the entire gap driven by self-employment. The raw earnings gap is $63,000 on a base of $162,000 and non-university earnings account for $18,000 (29 percent) of this total. Thus, while university pay explains most of the gap, commercial engagement substantially amplifies it. Earnings gaps appear in all components of non-university pay ' self-employment, and work for incumbent, young/startup, high-tech, and non-high-tech firms ' and remain large, though attenuated, after controlling publications, patents, field, university, scientific resources, age, marital status, childbearing, and demographics. Gaps widen as faculty move up the earnings distribution, and commercial engagement becomes a larger contributor. Men and women engage with similar industries, but men earn more in all shared industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    'Class of Customer' Question from the US Economic Census

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-66

    The Economic Census (EC) collects detailed information on the class of customers served by establishments'for example, the share of an establishment's sales to other businesses or to government entities'for a subset of sectors in the economy. In this paper, we evaluate the data from the 'Class of Customer' question from the EC, with a particular focus on sales to the government. These data have seldom been used in empirical research and are unique in that they enable researchers to link establishment-level Census data with information on government procurement. We compile and analyze large volumes of publicly available tabulated data about the class of customer question over time. Using these data, we document three main findings. First, total sales to government from establishments covered by the class of customer question account for approximately 4 percent of GDP'just under half of total government procurement as measured in the national accounts. Second, the sectoral distribution of government expenditure is significantly different from that of private sector spending. Certain industries, such as Construction and Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services, account for a much larger share of government expenditure relative to private sector expenditure. Third, sales to the government make up a substantial portion of total sales in several sectors'for instance, 70 percent in Facilities Support Services, 30 percent in Waste Treatment and Disposal, and 17 percent in Construction. Finally, we use the microdata to examine nonresponse rates to the class of customer question across establishments based on the number of employees.
    View Full Paper PDF