CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Current Population Survey'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 114

Internal Revenue Service - 100

American Community Survey - 91

Social Security Administration - 90

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 85

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 77

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 76

Protected Identification Key - 74

Social Security - 73

Center for Economic Studies - 64

Social Security Number - 62

National Science Foundation - 61

Ordinary Least Squares - 61

North American Industry Classification System - 56

Longitudinal Business Database - 52

Decennial Census - 51

Standard Industrial Classification - 45

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 44

Employer Identification Numbers - 43

Disclosure Review Board - 38

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 36

Federal Reserve Bank - 36

Person Validation System - 36

Cornell University - 35

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 34

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 34

2010 Census - 33

Business Register - 33

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 33

National Bureau of Economic Research - 31

Unemployment Insurance - 29

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 29

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 28

W-2 - 25

PSID - 25

Economic Census - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Special Sworn Status - 23

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 23

Department of Labor - 23

Service Annual Survey - 22

University of Chicago - 22

Census Bureau Business Register - 22

Person Identification Validation System - 22

Social and Economic Supplement - 21

Master Address File - 21

Census of Manufactures - 21

Detailed Earnings Records - 20

University of Maryland - 20

Personally Identifiable Information - 20

Research Data Center - 20

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 19

ASEC - 18

Earned Income Tax Credit - 18

1940 Census - 17

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

National Institute on Aging - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 16

LEHD Program - 16

Local Employment Dynamics - 16

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 15

Business Dynamics Statistics - 15

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 15

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 15

Total Factor Productivity - 14

SSA Numident - 14

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 13

Adjusted Gross Income - 13

Disability Insurance - 13

American Housing Survey - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Federal Reserve System - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Census 2000 - 13

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Housing and Urban Development - 12

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 12

Census Numident - 12

Administrative Records - 12

Department of Health and Human Services - 12

Business Employment Dynamics - 12

CPS ASEC - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

International Trade Research Report - 11

County Business Patterns - 11

Center for Administrative Records Research - 11

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 11

Core Based Statistical Area - 11

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 11

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

Department of Agriculture - 10

AKM - 10

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 10

Medicaid Services - 10

Labor Turnover Survey - 10

National Health Interview Survey - 10

American Economic Review - 10

Department of Economics - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

Urban Institute - 9

Standard Occupational Classification - 9

Occupational Employment Statistics - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

JOLTS - 9

Employment History File - 9

Office of Personnel Management - 9

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

MAFID - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Comparison of Putative Reidentification Rates - 8

Supreme Court - 8

Department of Homeland Security - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

Employer Characteristics File - 8

Social Security Disability Insurance - 7

Accommodation and Food Services - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

NBER Summer Institute - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Economic Research Service - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

PIKed - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Society of Labor Economists - 7

Bureau of Labor - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Some Other Race - 7

New York University - 7

Public Use Micro Sample - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 7

Census Edited File - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

Census Industry Code - 7

Boston College - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

National Opinion Research Center - 7

Current Employment Statistics - 7

United States Census Bureau - 6

COVID-19 - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 6

Data Management System - 6

Census Household Composition Key - 6

New York Times - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 6

CATI - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

University of Minnesota - 6

Journal of Human Resources - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Harvard University - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

WECD - 6

Annual Business Survey - 5

Yale University - 5

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Stanford University - 5

MAF-ARF - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

Indian Housing Information Center - 5

Master Earnings File - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Department of Defense - 5

HHS - 5

2SLS - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Business Master File - 5

Regional Economic Information System - 5

Journal of Political Economy - 5

MIT Press - 5

Summary Earnings Records - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

General Education Development - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

Technical Services - 4

Department of Education - 4

NUMIDENT - 4

Federal Register - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Business Services - 4

Professional Services - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Linear Probability Models - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Census of Retail Trade - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Sample Edited Detail File - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Postal Service - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

University of Toronto - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

George Mason University - 3

Princeton University - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

European Commission - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

World Bank - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

CAAA - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 3

IQR - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Public Administration - 3

VAR - 3

National Research Council - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

TFPQ - 3

employed - 103

labor - 96

workforce - 85

employ - 85

survey - 76

earnings - 72

recession - 64

employee - 60

population - 59

respondent - 58

economist - 49

payroll - 47

salary - 44

worker - 44

census bureau - 39

job - 37

earner - 36

estimating - 34

econometric - 33

poverty - 32

unemployed - 32

hiring - 31

census data - 31

occupation - 28

statistical - 26

expenditure - 25

data - 24

data census - 24

macroeconomic - 24

hispanic - 23

irs - 23

insurance - 22

welfare - 22

trend - 22

quarterly - 22

ethnicity - 21

resident - 21

heterogeneity - 21

agency - 21

endogeneity - 21

minority - 20

disadvantaged - 20

enrollment - 20

residence - 20

earn - 20

employment dynamics - 20

estimation - 19

revenue - 19

layoff - 19

immigrant - 19

medicaid - 19

socioeconomic - 19

tax - 19

census employment - 19

hire - 18

coverage - 18

percentile - 18

labor statistics - 18

unemployment rates - 18

ethnic - 17

survey income - 17

retirement - 17

industrial - 16

growth - 16

residential - 16

shift - 16

longitudinal - 16

estimates employment - 16

disparity - 15

report - 15

household surveys - 15

housing - 15

manufacturing - 15

migration - 15

migrant - 15

tenure - 15

workplace - 15

ssa - 14

eligibility - 14

citizen - 14

sector - 14

assessed - 14

imputation - 14

immigration - 14

research census - 14

employment statistics - 14

racial - 13

race - 13

demand - 13

census survey - 13

market - 13

mobility - 13

taxpayer - 13

employment growth - 13

production - 13

employment earnings - 13

bias - 12

discrimination - 12

estimator - 12

sampling - 12

gdp - 12

family - 12

labor markets - 12

incentive - 12

eligible - 12

aging - 12

1040 - 12

metropolitan - 12

entrepreneur - 12

entrepreneurship - 12

work census - 12

economically - 12

employment wages - 12

employing - 12

disability - 11

prevalence - 11

neighborhood - 11

intergenerational - 11

migrating - 11

datasets - 11

federal - 11

use census - 11

income data - 11

medicare - 11

establishment - 11

workers earnings - 11

employment estimates - 11

employment data - 11

employment unemployment - 11

enterprise - 11

clerical - 11

employer household - 11

longitudinal employer - 11

census research - 11

employee data - 11

health - 10

pandemic - 10

average - 10

poorer - 10

investment - 10

innovation - 10

moving - 10

migrate - 10

microdata - 10

filing - 10

mexican - 10

turnover - 10

aggregate - 9

population survey - 9

relocation - 9

state - 9

income survey - 9

pension - 9

census responses - 9

native - 9

economic census - 9

segregation - 9

home - 9

ancestry - 9

state employment - 9

yearly - 9

sale - 9

wage changes - 9

regress - 9

uninsured - 9

econometrician - 9

employment flows - 9

benefit - 8

rural - 8

technological - 8

relocate - 8

company - 8

financial - 8

subsidy - 8

survey households - 8

dependent - 8

profit - 8

retiree - 8

record - 8

matching - 8

race census - 8

recessionary - 8

decade - 8

assessing - 8

entrepreneurial - 8

venture - 8

worker demographics - 8

trends employment - 8

recession employment - 8

insurance coverage - 8

efficiency - 8

endogenous - 8

produce - 8

agriculture - 7

2010 census - 7

productive - 7

productivity growth - 7

parent - 7

parental - 7

unobserved - 7

spillover - 7

compensation - 7

provided census - 7

employment trends - 7

discrepancy - 7

woman - 7

poor - 7

policy - 7

earnings workers - 7

wealth - 7

corporation - 7

union - 7

coverage employer - 7

earnings employees - 7

earnings age - 7

effect wages - 7

effects employment - 7

wage data - 7

healthcare - 7

income year - 7

sample - 6

latino - 6

indian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

survey data - 6

rent - 6

generation - 6

adoption - 6

mortality - 6

cohort - 6

impact - 6

census linked - 6

wage growth - 6

saving - 6

census household - 6

exogeneity - 6

labor productivity - 6

white - 6

income distributions - 6

wage earnings - 6

associate - 6

organizational - 6

earnings inequality - 6

statistician - 6

workforce indicators - 6

regressing - 6

wages production - 6

trends labor - 6

enrollee - 6

exemption - 6

segregated - 6

insured - 6

proprietor - 6

inference - 6

income households - 6

proprietorship - 6

health insurance - 6

schooling - 6

income individuals - 6

educated - 6

community - 5

profitability - 5

technology - 5

marriage - 5

citizenship - 5

adulthood - 5

enrolled - 5

demography - 5

expense - 5

linked census - 5

industry wages - 5

transition - 5

earnings growth - 5

disclosure - 5

analysis - 5

distribution - 5

census use - 5

ownership - 5

merger - 5

accounting - 5

incorporated - 5

surveys censuses - 5

career - 5

records census - 5

fiscal - 5

industry employment - 5

regression - 5

wage regressions - 5

wage industries - 5

employment recession - 5

fertility - 5

census file - 5

retail - 5

researcher - 5

founder - 5

unemployment insurance - 5

owned businesses - 5

relocating - 5

black - 5

insurance premiums - 5

insurance employer - 5

employment count - 5

study - 5

asian - 4

renter - 4

patent - 4

reside - 4

specialization - 4

geographic - 4

urban - 4

city - 4

environmental - 4

census years - 4

outsourced - 4

finance - 4

database - 4

employment distribution - 4

autoregressive - 4

women earnings - 4

employment effects - 4

consumption - 4

information census - 4

corporate - 4

productivity measures - 4

productivity dynamics - 4

outsourcing - 4

immigrated - 4

assimilation - 4

information - 4

homeowner - 4

employment measures - 4

owner - 4

censuses surveys - 4

interracial - 4

wage gap - 4

gender - 4

business data - 4

increase employment - 4

wage variation - 4

department - 4

residing - 4

grocery - 4

industry productivity - 4

wages productivity - 4

wage differences - 4

factory - 4

business owners - 4

census business - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

taxation - 4

matched - 4

utilization - 4

premium - 4

employment changes - 4

research - 4

household income - 4

education - 4

town - 3

sociology - 3

spending - 3

census 2020 - 3

factor productivity - 3

depreciation - 3

productivity shocks - 3

prospect - 3

divorced - 3

census records - 3

innovate - 3

patenting - 3

geographically - 3

risk - 3

amenity - 3

export - 3

tariff - 3

growth productivity - 3

capital productivity - 3

volatility - 3

income children - 3

firms census - 3

impact employment - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

inventory - 3

financing - 3

banking - 3

ethnically - 3

classification - 3

bank - 3

wages employment - 3

pollution - 3

regional - 3

employed census - 3

businesses census - 3

consumer - 3

supermarket - 3

leverage - 3

measures productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

social - 3

locality - 3

characteristics businesses - 3

heterogeneous - 3

regressors - 3

rate - 3

commute - 3

country - 3

wage effects - 3

declining - 3

decline - 3

suburb - 3

commodity - 3

subsidized - 3

retailer - 3

acquisition - 3

inflation - 3

restructuring - 3

insurer - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 280


  • Working Paper

    Revisiting the Unintended Consequences of Ban the Box

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-58

    Ban-the-Box (BTB) policies intend to help formerly incarcerated individuals find employment by delaying when employers can ask about criminal records. We revisit the finding in Doleac and Hansen (2020) that BTB causes statistical discrimination against minority men. We correct miscoded BTB laws and show that estimates from the Current Population Survey (CPS) remain quantitatively similar, while those from the American Community Survey (ACS) now fail to reject the null hypothesis of no effect of BTB on employment. In contrast to the published estimates, these ACS results are statistically significantly different from the CPS results, indicating a lack of robustness across datasets. We do not find evidence that these differences are due to sample composition or survey weights. There is limited evidence that these divergent results are explained by the different frequencies of these surveys. Differences in sample sizes may also lead to different estimates; the ACS has a much larger sample and more statistical power to detect effects near the corrected CPS estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Differences in Disability Insurance Allowance Rates

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-54

    Allowance rates for disability insurance applications vary by race and ethnicity, but it is unclear to what extent these differences are artifacts of other differing socio-economic and health characteristics, or selection issues in SSA's race and ethnicity data. This paper uses the 2015 American Community Survey linked to 2015-2019 SSA administrative data to investigate DI application allowance rates among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic applicants aged 25-65. The analysis uses regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting to estimate differences in allowance rates among applicants who are similar on observable characteristics. Relative to raw comparisons, differences by race and ethnicity in multivariate analyses are substantially smaller in magnitude and are generally not statistically significant.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Receipt of Public and Private Food Assistance Across the Rural-Urban Continuum Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Current Population Survey Data

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-51

    Background: The nutrition safety net in the United States is critical to supporting food security among households in need. Food assistance in the United States includes both government-funded food programs and private community-based providers who distribute food to in need households. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted experiences of food security and use of private and public food assistance resources. However, this may have differed for households residing in urban versus rural areas. We explored receipt of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits or food from community-based emergency food providers across a detailed measure of the rural-urban continuum before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We linked restricted use Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement data to census-tract level United States Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes to estimate prevalence of self-reported SNAP participation and receipt of emergency food support across temporal (2015-2019 versus 2020-2021) and socio-spatial (urban, large rural city/town, small rural town, or isolated rural town/area) dimensions. We report prevalences as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals, all weighted for national representation. Results: The weighted prevalence of self-reported SNAP participation was 8.9% (8.7-9.2%) in 2015-2019 and 9.1% (8.5-9.5%) in 2020-2021 in urban areas, 11.4% (10.8-12.2%) in 2015-2019 and 11.6% (10.5-12.9%) in 2020-2021 in large rural towns/cities, 13.4% (12.3-14.6%) in 2015-2019 and 12.3% (10.5-14.5%) in 2020-2021 in small rural towns, and 9.7% (8.6-10.9%) in 2015-2019 and 10.9% (8.8-13.4% )in 2020-2021 isolated rural towns. The weighted prevalence of self-reported receipt of emergency food was 4.9% (4.8-5.1%) in 2015-2019 and 6.2% (5.8-6.5%) in 2020-2021 in urban areas, 6.8% (6.2-7.4%) in 2015-2019 and 7.6% (6.6-8.6%) in 2020-2021 in large rural towns/cities, 8.1% (7.3-9.1%) in 2015-2019 and 7.1% (5.7-8.8%) in 2020-2021 in small rural towns, and 6.8% (5.9-7.7%) in 2015-2019 and 8.5% (6.7-10.6%) in 2020-2021 isolated rural towns. Conclusion: Households in rural communities use public and private food assistance at higher rates than urban areas, but there is variation across communities depending on the level of rurality.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Earnings Measurement Error, Nonresponse and Administrative Mismatch in the CPS

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-48

    Using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement matched to Social Security Administration Detailed Earnings Records, we link observations across consecutive years to investigate a relationship between item nonresponse and measurement error in the earnings questions. Linking individuals across consecutive years allows us to observe switching from response to nonresponse and vice versa. We estimate OLS, IV, and finite mixture models that allow for various assumptions separately for men and women. We find that those who respond in both years of the survey exhibit less measurement error than those who respond in one year. Our findings suggest a trade-off between survey response and data quality that should be considered by survey designers, data collectors, and data users.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Rural/Urban Volunteering Divide

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-42

    Are rural residents more likely to volunteer than those living in urban places? Although early sociological theory posited that rural residents were more likely to experience social bonds connecting them to their community, increasing their odds of volunteer engagement, empirical support is limited. Drawing upon the full population of rural and urban respondents to the United States Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015), we found that rural respondents are more likely to report volunteering compared to urban respondents, although these differences are decreasing over time. Moreover, we found that propensities for rural and urban volunteerism vary based on differences in both individual and place-based characteristics; further, the size of these effects differ across rural and urban places. These findings have important implications for theory and empirical analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Decline of Volunteering in the United States: Is it the Economy?

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-41

    This article investigates the complex interactions between local and national economic contexts and volunteering behavior. We examine three dimensions of local economic context'economic disadvantage (e.g., the percentage of families living in poverty), income inequality, and economic growth (e.g., the change in median household income) and the impact of a national/global economic jolt'the Great Recession. Analysis of data from the Current Population Survey's (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015) reveals. Individuals who live in places characterized by economic disadvantage and economic inequality are less likely to volunteer than individuals in more advantaged, equitable communities. The recession had a dampening effect on volunteering overall, but it had the largest dampening effect on individual volunteering in communities with above average rates of income equality and higher rates of economic growth. While individuals living in rural communities were more likely to volunteer than their urban counterparts before the recession, rural/urban differences disappear after the recession.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-36

    Timely business-level measures of work from home (WFH) are scarce for the U.S. economy. We review prior survey-based efforts to quantify the incidence and character of WFH and describe new questions that we developed and fielded for the Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS). Drawing on more than 150,000 firm-level responses to the BTOS, we obtain four main findings. First, nearly a third of businesses have employees who work from home, with tremendous variation across sectors. The share of businesses with WFH employees is nearly ten times larger in the Information sector than in Accommodation and Food Services. Second, employees work from home about 1 day per week, on average, and businesses expect similar WFH levels in five years. Third, feasibility aside, businesses' largest concern with WFH relates to productivity. Seven percent of businesses find that onsite work is more productive, while two percent find that WFH is more productive. Fourth, there is a low level of tracking and monitoring of WFH activities, with 70% of firms reporting they do not track employee days in the office and 75% reporting they do not monitor employees when they work from home. These lessons serve as a starting point for enhancing WFH-related content in the American Community Survey and other household surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effects of Eviction on Children

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-34

    Eviction may be an important channel for the intergenerational transmission of poverty, and concerns about its effects on children are often raised as a rationale for tenant protection policies. We study how eviction impacts children's home environment, school engagement, educational achievement, and high school completion by assembling new data sets linking eviction court records in Chicago and New York to administrative public school records and restricted Census records. To disentangle the consequences of eviction from the effects of correlated sources of economic distress, we use a research design based on the random assignment of court cases to judges who vary in their leniency. We find that eviction increases children's residential mobility, homelessness, and likelihood of doubling up with grandparents or other adults. Eviction also disrupts school engagement, causing increased absences and school changes. While we find little impact on elementary and middle school test scores, eviction substantially reduces high school course credits. Lastly, we find that eviction reduces high school graduation and use a novel bounding method to show that this finding is not driven by differential attrition. The disruptive effects of eviction appear worse for older children and boys. Our evidence suggests that the impact of eviction on children runs through the disruption to the home environment or school engagement rather than deterioration in school or neighborhood quality, and may be moderated by access to family support networks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Rising Returns to R&D: Ideas Are Not Getting Harder to Find

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-29

    R&D investment has grown robustly, yet aggregate productivity growth has stagnated. Is this because 'ideas are getting harder to find'? This paper uses micro-data from the US Census Bureau to explore the relationship between R&D and productivity in the manufacturing sector from 1976 to 2018. We find that both the elasticity of output (TFP) with respect to R&D and the marginal returns to R&D have risen sharply. Exploring factors affecting returns, we conclude that R&D obsolescence rates must have risen. Using a novel estimation approach, we find consistent evidence of sharply rising technological rivalry. These findings suggest that R&D has become more effective at finding productivity-enhancing ideas but these ideas may also render rivals' technologies obsolete, making innovations more transient.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Divorce, Family Arrangements, and Children's Adult Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-28

    Nearly a third of American children experience parental divorce before adulthood. To understand its consequences, we use linked tax and Census records for over 5 million children to examine how divorce affects family arrangements and children's long-term outcomes. Following divorce, parents move apart, household income falls, parents work longer hours, families move more frequently, and households relocate to poorer neighborhoods with less economic opportunity. This bundle of changes in family circumstances suggests multiple channels through which divorce may affect children's development and outcomes. In the years following divorce, we observe sharp increases in teen births and child mortality. To examine long-run effects on children, we compare siblings with different lengths of exposure to the same divorce. We find that parental divorce reduces children's adult earnings and college residence while increasing incarceration, mortality, and teen births. Changes in household income, neighborhood quality, and parent proximity account for 25 to 60 percent of these divorce effects.
    View Full Paper PDF