CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Survey of Income and Program Participation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Current Population Survey - 78

Social Security Administration - 67

Internal Revenue Service - 52

Social Security - 48

American Community Survey - 43

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 40

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 37

Social Security Number - 34

Protected Identification Key - 33

PSID - 30

Center for Economic Studies - 29

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 27

National Science Foundation - 24

Employer Identification Numbers - 24

Ordinary Least Squares - 23

Research Data Center - 22

Detailed Earnings Records - 21

North American Industry Classification System - 20

Decennial Census - 20

Disclosure Review Board - 19

Cornell University - 19

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 18

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 18

Service Annual Survey - 17

Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Business Register - 17

Federal Reserve Bank - 16

Unemployment Insurance - 15

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 15

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 14

W-2 - 13

2010 Census - 13

Person Validation System - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Health and Retirement Study - 12

Master Address File - 12

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 12

National Institute on Aging - 12

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

ASEC - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 11

National Bureau of Economic Research - 11

Summary Earnings Records - 11

Department of Labor - 10

Earned Income Tax Credit - 10

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 10

Economic Census - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Office of Management and Budget - 9

Disability Insurance - 9

Master Earnings File - 9

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 9

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 8

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Urban Institute - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Stern School of Business - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

University of Maryland - 6

General Accounting Office - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Survey of Consumer Finances - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Person Identification Validation System - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Employment History File - 6

County Business Patterns - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Business Employment Dynamics - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 5

Administrative Records - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

Longitudinal Research Database - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

American Economic Association - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 5

Social Security Disability Insurance - 4

CPS ASEC - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Centers for Medicare - 4

Census Numident - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

Census Edited File - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Department of Economics - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 4

1940 Census - 4

PIKed - 4

Public Administration - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Boston College - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Business Master File - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Successor Predecessor File - 4

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Federal Register - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

General Education Development - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Postal Service - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Harvard University - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

survey - 45

respondent - 39

employed - 38

earnings - 30

labor - 29

recession - 28

employ - 27

unemployed - 21

statistical - 20

welfare - 19

data - 19

population - 19

workforce - 19

employee - 18

economist - 18

agency - 17

salary - 17

census data - 17

poverty - 16

earner - 15

retirement - 15

ssa - 14

census bureau - 14

data census - 14

survey income - 13

datasets - 13

earn - 13

statistician - 12

job - 12

longitudinal - 12

econometric - 12

estimating - 11

socioeconomic - 11

microdata - 11

census employment - 11

family - 10

hispanic - 10

insurance - 10

medicaid - 10

resident - 10

worker - 10

disparity - 9

eligibility - 9

disadvantaged - 9

payroll - 9

immigrant - 9

fertility - 9

trend - 9

tenure - 9

employee data - 9

employment data - 8

housing - 8

ethnicity - 8

sampling - 8

household surveys - 8

census survey - 8

eligible - 8

pension - 8

irs - 8

occupation - 8

labor statistics - 8

employment dynamics - 8

employer household - 8

unemployment rates - 7

benefit - 7

wealth - 7

residential - 7

intergenerational - 7

residence - 7

disability - 7

survey data - 7

assessed - 7

aging - 7

retiree - 7

parental - 7

assessing - 7

analysis - 7

information - 7

enrollment - 7

census research - 7

marriage - 7

report - 7

coverage - 7

employment statistics - 6

state - 6

sample - 6

bias - 6

percentile - 6

medicare - 6

immigration - 6

citizen - 6

disclosure - 6

confidentiality - 6

use census - 6

record - 6

longitudinal employer - 6

mobility - 6

yearly - 6

layoff - 6

study - 6

estimates employment - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

enterprise - 6

incentive - 5

filing - 5

generation - 5

home - 5

homeowner - 5

mortgage - 5

estimator - 5

minority - 5

average - 5

subsidy - 5

survey households - 5

taxpayer - 5

income survey - 5

saving - 5

parent - 5

imputation - 5

dependent - 5

income households - 5

cohort - 5

linked census - 5

quarterly - 5

health - 5

censuses surveys - 5

shift - 5

database - 5

workplace - 5

income year - 5

divorced - 5

research - 5

research census - 5

metropolitan - 5

hiring - 5

financial - 5

entrepreneur - 5

employment estimates - 5

federal - 5

discrepancy - 5

state employment - 4

compensation - 4

renter - 4

racial - 4

propensity - 4

estimation - 4

finance - 4

borrower - 4

prevalence - 4

poorer - 4

expenditure - 4

census household - 4

citizenship - 4

census responses - 4

adoption - 4

mother - 4

endogeneity - 4

privacy - 4

unobserved - 4

household income - 4

clerical - 4

career - 4

heterogeneity - 4

migrate - 4

migration - 4

migrating - 4

employment trends - 4

women earnings - 4

employing - 4

researcher - 4

work census - 4

tax - 4

statistical agencies - 4

regress - 4

uninsured - 4

insured - 4

wage earnings - 4

economic census - 4

effects employment - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

endowment - 3

neighborhood - 3

house - 3

ethnic - 3

latino - 3

race - 3

aggregate - 3

population survey - 3

lending - 3

loan - 3

lender - 3

debt - 3

credit - 3

income data - 3

mexican - 3

1040 - 3

linkage - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

publicly - 3

family income - 3

segregation - 3

sociology - 3

mortality - 3

surveys censuses - 3

provided census - 3

discrimination - 3

wage gap - 3

macroeconomic - 3

recessionary - 3

endogenous - 3

maternal - 3

pregnancy - 3

migrant - 3

wage changes - 3

recession employment - 3

wage data - 3

hire - 3

information census - 3

relocating - 3

relocate - 3

decade - 3

parents income - 3

employment growth - 3

spouse - 3

venture - 3

proprietorship - 3

schooling - 3

moving - 3

risk - 3

economically - 3

insurance employer - 3

employment earnings - 3

business data - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 116


  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance, Wage Pass-Through, and Endogenous Take-Up

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-59

    This paper studies how unemployment insurance (UI) generosity affects reservation wages, re-employment wages, and benefit take-up. Using Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) data, we estimate a cross-sectional elasticity of reservation wages with respect to weekly UI benefits of 0.014. Exploiting state variation in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) intensity and the timing of federal supplements, we find that expanded benefits during COVID-19 increased reservation wages by 8'12 percent. Using CPS rotation data, we also document a 9 percent rise in re-employment wages for UI-eligible workers relative to ineligible workers. Over the same period, the UI take-up rate rose from roughly 30 to 40 percent; Probit estimates indicate that higher benefit levels, rather than changes in observables, account for this increase. A directed search model with an endogenous filing decision replicates these facts: generosity primarily operates through the extensive margin of take-up, which mutes the pass-through from benefits to wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Housing Capital and Intergenerational Mobility in the United States

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-55

    Housing represents the most important capital asset for most U.S. families. Despite substantial analysis of the intergenerational mobility of income, large gaps in our knowledge of the distribution of housing assets and their transmission over time remain, as housing is generally not reflected by income flows. Using novel linked data that combines survey responses with administrative tax data and information on ownership and valuation from property tax records for over 3.4 million families, we provide new evidence on the intergenerational transmission of housing capital. We find that housing capital is more persistent across generations than labor income. We document important disparities between average housing outcomes for White and Black children. These difference persist even conditional on parent rank in the distribution of housing assets, with the gap growing throughout the parental housing capital distribution. A decomposition shows that average differences in children's labor market outcomes associated with parental assets explain about half of the observed intergenerational persistence (a 'labor income channel'), and that there is also a substantial 'direct channel' ' conditional on children having the same earnings, children of parents with more housing assets have more assets themselves on average. The direct channel is also important for explaining the intergenerational gap in outcomes of Black and White children. Finally, we present quasi-experimental evidence that local housing supply constraints help explain spatial differences in intergenerational persistence across US counties. Our results establish the importance of housing markets, both independently from and jointly with labor markets, in shaping the intergenerational persistence of economic resources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Differences in Disability Insurance Allowance Rates

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-54

    Allowance rates for disability insurance applications vary by race and ethnicity, but it is unclear to what extent these differences are artifacts of other differing socio-economic and health characteristics, or selection issues in SSA's race and ethnicity data. This paper uses the 2015 American Community Survey linked to 2015-2019 SSA administrative data to investigate DI application allowance rates among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic applicants aged 25-65. The analysis uses regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting to estimate differences in allowance rates among applicants who are similar on observable characteristics. Relative to raw comparisons, differences by race and ethnicity in multivariate analyses are substantially smaller in magnitude and are generally not statistically significant.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Earnings Measurement Error, Nonresponse and Administrative Mismatch in the CPS

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-48

    Using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement matched to Social Security Administration Detailed Earnings Records, we link observations across consecutive years to investigate a relationship between item nonresponse and measurement error in the earnings questions. Linking individuals across consecutive years allows us to observe switching from response to nonresponse and vice versa. We estimate OLS, IV, and finite mixture models that allow for various assumptions separately for men and women. We find that those who respond in both years of the survey exhibit less measurement error than those who respond in one year. Our findings suggest a trade-off between survey response and data quality that should be considered by survey designers, data collectors, and data users.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Credit Access in the United States

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-45

    We construct new population-level linked administrative data to study households' access to credit in the United States. These data reveal large differences in credit access by race, class, and hometown. By age 25, Black individuals, those who grew up in low-income families, and those who grew up in certain areas (including the Southeast and Appalachia) have significantly lower credit scores than other groups. Consistent with lower scores generating credit constraints, these individuals have smaller balances, more credit inquiries, higher credit card utilization rates, and greater use of alternative higher-cost forms of credit. Tests for alternative definitions of algorithmic bias in credit scores yield results in opposite directions. From a calibration perspective, group-level differences in credit scores understate differences in delinquency: conditional on a given credit score, Black individuals and those from low-income families fall delinquent at relatively higher rates. From a balance perspective, these groups receive lower credit scores even when comparing those with the same future repayment behavior. Addressing both of these biases and expanding credit access to groups with lower credit scores requires addressing group-level differences in delinquency rates. These delinquencies emerge soon after individuals access credit in their early twenties, often due to missed payments on credit cards, student loans, and other bills. Comprehensive measures of individuals' income profiles, income volatility, and observed wealth explain only a small portion of these repayment gaps. In contrast, we find that the large variation in repayment across hometowns mostly reflects the causal effect of childhood exposure to these places. Places that promote upward income mobility also promote repayment and expand credit access even conditional on income, suggesting that common place-level factors may drive behaviors in both credit and labor markets. We discuss suggestive evidence for several mechanisms that drive our results, including the role of social and cultural capital. We conclude that gaps in credit access by race, class, and hometown have roots in childhood environments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: Tip Reporting at U.S. Restaurants, 2005-2018

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-68

    Tipping is a significant form of compensation for many restaurant jobs, but it is poorly measured and therefore not well understood. We combine several large administrative and survey datasets and document patterns in tip reporting that are consistent with systematic under-reporting of tip income. Our analysis indicates that although the vast majority of tipped workers do report earning some tips, the dollar value of tips is under-reported and is sensitive to reporting incentives. In total, we estimate that about eight billion in tips paid at full-service, single-location, restaurants were not captured in tax data annually over the period 2005-2018. Due to changes in payment methods and reporting incentives, tip reporting has increased over time. Our findings have implications for downstream measures dependent on accurate measures of compensation including poverty measurement among tipped restaurant workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Income of the Aged in Household Surveys: Evidence from Linked Administrative Records

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-32

    Research has shown that household survey estimates of retirement income (defined benefit pensions and defined contribution account withdrawals) suffer from substantial underreporting which biases downward measures of financial well-being among the aged. Using data from both the redesigned 2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), each matched with administrative records, we examine to what extent underreporting of retirement income affects key statistics such as reliance on Social Security benefits and poverty among the aged. We find that underreporting of retirement income is still prevalent in the CPS ASEC. While the HRS does a better job than the CPS ASEC in terms of capturing retirement income, it still falls considerably short compared to administrative records. Consequently, the relative importance of Social Security income remains overstated in household surveys'53 percent of elderly beneficiaries in the CPS ASEC and 49 percent in the HRS rely on Social Security for the majority of their incomes compared to 42 percent in the linked administrative data. The poverty rate for those aged 65 and over is also overstated'8.8 percent in the CPS ASEC and 7.4 percent in the HRS compared to 6.4 percent in the linked administrative data. Our results illustrate the effects of using alternative data sources in producing key statistics from the Social Security Administration's Income of the Aged publication.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Citizenship Question Effects on Household Survey Response

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-31

    Several small-sample studies have predicted that a citizenship question in the 2020 Census would cause a large drop in self-response rates. In contrast, minimal effects were found in Poehler et al.'s (2020) analysis of the 2019 Census Test randomized controlled trial (RCT). We reconcile these findings by analyzing associations between characteristics about the addresses in the 2019 Census Test and their response behavior by linking to independently constructed administrative data. We find significant heterogeneity in sensitivity to the citizenship question among households containing Hispanics, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens. Response drops the most for households containing noncitizens ineligible for a Social Security number (SSN). It falls more for households with Latin American-born immigrants than those with immigrants from other countries. Response drops less for households with U.S.-born Hispanics than households with noncitizens from Latin America. Reductions in responsiveness occur not only through lower unit self-response rates, but also by increased household roster omissions and internet break-offs. The inclusion of a citizenship question increases the undercount of households with noncitizens. Households with noncitizens also have much higher citizenship question item nonresponse rates than those only containing citizens. The use of tract-level characteristics and significant heterogeneity among Hispanics, the foreign-born, and noncitizens help explain why the effects found by Poehler et al. were so small. Linking administrative microdata with the RCT data expands what we can learn from the RCT.
    View Full Paper PDF