CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Survey of Income and Program Participation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Current Population Survey - 75

Social Security Administration - 65

Internal Revenue Service - 50

Social Security - 44

American Community Survey - 40

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 38

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 36

Social Security Number - 32

Center for Economic Studies - 29

Protected Identification Key - 29

PSID - 28

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 24

Employer Identification Numbers - 24

Ordinary Least Squares - 22

National Science Foundation - 22

Research Data Center - 22

North American Industry Classification System - 19

Decennial Census - 19

Detailed Earnings Records - 19

Disclosure Review Board - 19

Cornell University - 19

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 18

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 18

Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Business Register - 17

Service Annual Survey - 16

Unemployment Insurance - 15

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 15

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 14

Federal Reserve Bank - 14

2010 Census - 13

Person Validation System - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Master Address File - 12

W-2 - 12

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 12

National Institute on Aging - 12

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

American Housing Survey - 11

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 11

Health and Retirement Study - 11

National Bureau of Economic Research - 11

Summary Earnings Records - 11

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 10

Economic Census - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

ASEC - 9

Disability Insurance - 9

Earned Income Tax Credit - 9

Master Earnings File - 9

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 9

Office of Management and Budget - 8

Department of Labor - 8

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Urban Institute - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Stern School of Business - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Person Identification Validation System - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Employment History File - 6

County Business Patterns - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Business Employment Dynamics - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 5

Administrative Records - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

Longitudinal Research Database - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

American Economic Association - 5

University of Chicago - 5

University of Maryland - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

CDF - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 5

Centers for Medicare - 4

Census Numident - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

Census Edited File - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Department of Economics - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 4

1940 Census - 4

PIKed - 4

Public Administration - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Boston College - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Business Master File - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Federal Register - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

General Education Development - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Postal Service - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Board of Governors - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Harvard University - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

survey - 44

employed - 38

respondent - 37

earnings - 28

labor - 28

recession - 28

employ - 27

unemployed - 20

statistical - 19

workforce - 19

population - 18

welfare - 18

data - 18

employee - 18

economist - 18

census data - 17

poverty - 16

salary - 16

agency - 16

retirement - 15

data census - 14

earner - 14

datasets - 13

census bureau - 13

earn - 13

ssa - 12

survey income - 12

statistician - 12

job - 12

longitudinal - 12

econometric - 12

socioeconomic - 11

microdata - 11

census employment - 11

medicaid - 10

estimating - 10

resident - 10

worker - 10

payroll - 9

immigrant - 9

family - 9

fertility - 9

insurance - 9

trend - 9

tenure - 9

employee data - 9

household surveys - 8

census survey - 8

eligibility - 8

eligible - 8

pension - 8

hispanic - 8

irs - 8

disadvantaged - 8

occupation - 8

labor statistics - 8

employment dynamics - 8

employer household - 8

sampling - 7

assessed - 7

aging - 7

retiree - 7

disparity - 7

parental - 7

assessing - 7

analysis - 7

housing - 7

information - 7

enrollment - 7

census research - 7

marriage - 7

report - 7

employment data - 7

coverage - 7

bias - 6

percentile - 6

medicare - 6

disability - 6

ethnicity - 6

immigration - 6

citizen - 6

disclosure - 6

confidentiality - 6

residential - 6

use census - 6

residence - 6

survey data - 6

record - 6

longitudinal employer - 6

intergenerational - 6

mobility - 6

yearly - 6

layoff - 6

study - 6

estimates employment - 6

unemployment rates - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

wealth - 6

enterprise - 6

subsidy - 5

sample - 5

survey households - 5

taxpayer - 5

income survey - 5

saving - 5

parent - 5

imputation - 5

dependent - 5

income households - 5

cohort - 5

linked census - 5

quarterly - 5

health - 5

censuses surveys - 5

shift - 5

state - 5

database - 5

employment statistics - 5

workplace - 5

income year - 5

divorced - 5

research - 5

research census - 5

metropolitan - 5

hiring - 5

financial - 5

entrepreneur - 5

employment estimates - 5

federal - 5

benefit - 5

discrepancy - 5

prevalence - 4

incentive - 4

poorer - 4

expenditure - 4

census household - 4

citizenship - 4

census responses - 4

adoption - 4

mother - 4

endogeneity - 4

privacy - 4

unobserved - 4

household income - 4

homeowner - 4

home - 4

clerical - 4

career - 4

heterogeneity - 4

migrate - 4

migration - 4

migrating - 4

employment trends - 4

estimator - 4

filing - 4

women earnings - 4

average - 4

employing - 4

researcher - 4

work census - 4

tax - 4

generation - 4

statistical agencies - 4

regress - 4

uninsured - 4

insured - 4

wage earnings - 4

economic census - 4

income data - 3

finance - 3

mexican - 3

1040 - 3

minority - 3

linkage - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

publicly - 3

family income - 3

renter - 3

segregation - 3

sociology - 3

mortgage - 3

mortality - 3

surveys censuses - 3

discrimination - 3

wage gap - 3

state employment - 3

macroeconomic - 3

recessionary - 3

endogenous - 3

maternal - 3

pregnancy - 3

migrant - 3

wage changes - 3

recession employment - 3

estimation - 3

wage data - 3

hire - 3

compensation - 3

information census - 3

relocating - 3

relocate - 3

decade - 3

parents income - 3

borrower - 3

employment growth - 3

venture - 3

proprietorship - 3

schooling - 3

moving - 3

risk - 3

economically - 3

insurance employer - 3

employment earnings - 3

business data - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 111


  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: Tip Reporting at U.S. Restaurants, 2005-2018

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-68

    Tipping is a significant form of compensation for many restaurant jobs, but it is poorly measured and therefore not well understood. We combine several large administrative and survey datasets and document patterns in tip reporting that are consistent with systematic under-reporting of tip income. Our analysis indicates that although the vast majority of tipped workers do report earning some tips, the dollar value of tips is under-reported and is sensitive to reporting incentives. In total, we estimate that about eight billion in tips paid at full-service, single-location, restaurants were not captured in tax data annually over the period 2005-2018. Due to changes in payment methods and reporting incentives, tip reporting has increased over time. Our findings have implications for downstream measures dependent on accurate measures of compensation including poverty measurement among tipped restaurant workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Income of the Aged in Household Surveys: Evidence from Linked Administrative Records

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-32

    Research has shown that household survey estimates of retirement income (defined benefit pensions and defined contribution account withdrawals) suffer from substantial underreporting which biases downward measures of financial well-being among the aged. Using data from both the redesigned 2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), each matched with administrative records, we examine to what extent underreporting of retirement income affects key statistics such as reliance on Social Security benefits and poverty among the aged. We find that underreporting of retirement income is still prevalent in the CPS ASEC. While the HRS does a better job than the CPS ASEC in terms of capturing retirement income, it still falls considerably short compared to administrative records. Consequently, the relative importance of Social Security income remains overstated in household surveys'53 percent of elderly beneficiaries in the CPS ASEC and 49 percent in the HRS rely on Social Security for the majority of their incomes compared to 42 percent in the linked administrative data. The poverty rate for those aged 65 and over is also overstated'8.8 percent in the CPS ASEC and 7.4 percent in the HRS compared to 6.4 percent in the linked administrative data. Our results illustrate the effects of using alternative data sources in producing key statistics from the Social Security Administration's Income of the Aged publication.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Citizenship Question Effects on Household Survey Response

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-31

    Several small-sample studies have predicted that a citizenship question in the 2020 Census would cause a large drop in self-response rates. In contrast, minimal effects were found in Poehler et al.'s (2020) analysis of the 2019 Census Test randomized controlled trial (RCT). We reconcile these findings by analyzing associations between characteristics about the addresses in the 2019 Census Test and their response behavior by linking to independently constructed administrative data. We find significant heterogeneity in sensitivity to the citizenship question among households containing Hispanics, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens. Response drops the most for households containing noncitizens ineligible for a Social Security number (SSN). It falls more for households with Latin American-born immigrants than those with immigrants from other countries. Response drops less for households with U.S.-born Hispanics than households with noncitizens from Latin America. Reductions in responsiveness occur not only through lower unit self-response rates, but also by increased household roster omissions and internet break-offs. The inclusion of a citizenship question increases the undercount of households with noncitizens. Households with noncitizens also have much higher citizenship question item nonresponse rates than those only containing citizens. The use of tract-level characteristics and significant heterogeneity among Hispanics, the foreign-born, and noncitizens help explain why the effects found by Poehler et al. were so small. Linking administrative microdata with the RCT data expands what we can learn from the RCT.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where Are Your Parents? Exploring Potential Bias in Administrative Records on Children

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-18

    This paper examines potential bias in the Census Household Composition Key's (CHCK) probabilistic parent-child linkages. By linking CHCK data to the American Community Survey (ACS), we reveal disparities in parent-child linkages among specific demographic groups and find that characteristics of children that can and cannot be linked to the CHCK vary considerably from the larger population. In particular, we find that children from low-income, less educated households and of Hispanic origin are less likely to be linked to a mother or a father in the CHCK. We also highlight some data considerations when using the CHCK.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Icing on the Cake: The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Income Data Quality in the SIPP

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-03

    Accurate measurement of key income variables plays a crucial role in economic research and policy decision-making. However, the presence of item nonresponse and measurement error in survey data can cause biased estimates. These biases can subsequently lead to sub-optimal policy decisions and inefficient allocation of resources. While there have been various studies documenting item nonresponse and measurement error in economic data, there have not been many studies investigating interventions that could reduce item nonresponse and measurement error. In our research, we investigate the impact of monetary incentives on reducing item nonresponse and measurement error for labor and investment income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Our study utilizes a randomized incentive experiment in Waves 1 and 2 of the 2014 SIPP, which allows us to assess the effectiveness of incentives in reducing item nonresponse and measurement error. We find that households receiving incentives had item nonresponse rates that are 1.3 percentage points lower for earnings and 1.5 percentage points lower for Social Security income. Measurement error was 6.31 percentage points lower at the intensive margin for interest income, and 16.48 percentage points lower for dividend income compared to non-incentive recipient households. These findings provide valuable insights for data producers and users and highlight the importance of implementing strategies to improve data quality in economic research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An In-Depth Examination of Requirements for Disclosure Risk Assessment

    October 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-49

    The use of formal privacy to protect the confidentiality of responses in the 2020 Decennial Census of Population and Housing has triggered renewed interest and debate over how to measure the disclosure risks and societal benefits of the published data products. Following long-established precedent in economics and statistics, we argue that any proposal for quantifying disclosure risk should be based on pre-specified, objective criteria. Such criteria should be used to compare methodologies to identify those with the most desirable properties. We illustrate this approach, using simple desiderata, to evaluate the absolute disclosure risk framework, the counterfactual framework underlying differential privacy, and prior-to-posterior comparisons. We conclude that satisfying all the desiderata is impossible, but counterfactual comparisons satisfy the most while absolute disclosure risk satisfies the fewest. Furthermore, we explain that many of the criticisms levied against differential privacy would be levied against any technology that is not equivalent to direct, unrestricted access to confidential data. Thus, more research is needed, but in the near-term, the counterfactual approach appears best-suited for privacy-utility analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    When and Why Does Nonresponse Occur? Comparing the Determinants of Initial Unit Nonresponse and Panel Attrition

    September 2023

    Authors: Tiffany S. Neman

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-44

    Though unit nonresponse threatens data quality in both cross-sectional and panel surveys, little is understood about how initial nonresponse and later panel attrition may be theoretically or empirically distinct phenomena. This study advances current knowledge of the determinants of both unit nonresponse and panel attrition within the context of the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) panel survey, which I link with high-quality federal administrative records, paradata, and geographic data. By exploiting the SIPP's interpenetrated sampling design and relying on cross-classified random effects modeling, this study quantifies the relative effects of sample household, interviewer, and place characteristics on baseline nonresponse and later attrition, addressing a critical gap in the literature. Given the reliance on successful record linkages between survey sample households and federal administrative data in the nonresponse research, this study also undertakes an explicitly spatial analysis of the place-based characteristics associated with successful record linkages in the U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Shift or replenishment? Reassessing the prospect of stable Spanish bilingualism across contexts of ethnic change

    June 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-28

    Much of the existing literature on Latinos' use of Spanish claims that a general pattern of intergenerational decline in the use of Spanish will produce an overall shift away from Spanish use in the U.S. (Rumbaut, Massey, and Bean 2006; Veltman 1983b, 1990). In contrast, recent works emphasize the importance of the social and linguistic context in reinforcing the use of Spanish as well as (pan)ethnic identities among U.S.-born Latinos (Linton 2004; Linton and Jim'nez 2009; Stevens 1992). This literature suggests conditions under which Spanish-English bilingualism might become stable at the level of metropolitan areas; however, such conditions depend on how immigration shapes the context of language use for native-born Latinos. Given the declining levels of immigration from Latin America, will bilingualism subside in the U.S., or have certain communities created conditions in which bilingualism can be stable? Using geocoded data from restricted access versions of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the American Community Survey (ACS), we model the probability of Spanish-English bilingualism among second- and third-generation Latinos using multilevel models with contextual measures of immigration and language use at both the neighborhood and metropolitan levels. We find evidence that U.S.-born Latinos are heavily influenced by the prevalence of Spanish use among U.S. born Latinos at both the metropolitan and neighborhood levels. Further, the proportion of foreign-born Latinos has little effect on the native born, after controlling for Spanish use among U.S,-born Latinos. These results are a first step in understanding the link between ethnic or panethnic contexts and language practices, and also in producing a better characterization of stable bilingualism that can be tested quantitatively.
    View Full Paper PDF