CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Internal Revenue Service'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Social Security Administration - 106

Center for Economic Studies - 106

American Community Survey - 100

Current Population Survey - 99

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 99

Longitudinal Business Database - 96

Protected Identification Key - 94

North American Industry Classification System - 94

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 92

Employer Identification Numbers - 90

Social Security Number - 85

Social Security - 75

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 75

National Science Foundation - 62

Business Register - 61

Disclosure Review Board - 60

Standard Industrial Classification - 57

Ordinary Least Squares - 56

Decennial Census - 54

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 50

W-2 - 50

Person Validation System - 49

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 47

Economic Census - 47

National Bureau of Economic Research - 42

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 42

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 42

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 39

Census Bureau Business Register - 39

2010 Census - 36

Master Address File - 35

County Business Patterns - 33

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 33

Person Identification Validation System - 32

Census of Manufactures - 32

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 31

Business Dynamics Statistics - 30

Characteristics of Business Owners - 30

Service Annual Survey - 30

Research Data Center - 30

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 29

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 28

Longitudinal Research Database - 28

Census Numident - 27

Small Business Administration - 26

Personally Identifiable Information - 25

Office of Management and Budget - 25

Unemployment Insurance - 25

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 25

Total Factor Productivity - 25

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 24

Postal Service - 24

Housing and Urban Development - 23

Federal Reserve Bank - 23

University of Chicago - 23

Special Sworn Status - 22

Adjusted Gross Income - 22

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 22

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 21

Cornell University - 21

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 20

National Center for Health Statistics - 20

Department of Labor - 19

Indian Health Service - 19

Earned Income Tax Credit - 18

Federal Reserve System - 17

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 17

Detailed Earnings Records - 17

PSID - 17

International Trade Research Report - 16

Data Management System - 16

Administrative Records - 16

Department of Homeland Security - 16

Company Organization Survey - 16

SSA Numident - 15

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 15

Department of Commerce - 15

Permanent Plant Number - 15

COVID-19 - 14

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 14

Core Based Statistical Area - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 13

Medicaid Services - 13

ASEC - 13

Disability Insurance - 13

Survey of Business Owners - 13

Census Household Composition Key - 13

Employer Characteristics File - 13

University of Maryland - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Kauffman Foundation - 13

Social and Economic Supplement - 12

Department of Economics - 12

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 12

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 12

Department of Education - 11

Retail Trade - 11

General Accounting Office - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 11

Board of Governors - 11

Local Employment Dynamics - 11

Securities and Exchange Commission - 11

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 11

American Economic Association - 11

Urban Institute - 10

Centers for Medicare - 10

MAFID - 10

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 10

Center for Administrative Records Research - 10

Russell Sage Foundation - 10

Master Beneficiary Record - 10

MAF-ARF - 10

Composite Person Record - 10

New York University - 10

Patent and Trademark Office - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

National Institutes of Health - 10

Initial Public Offering - 10

Cobb-Douglas - 10

Business Master File - 10

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 9

Technical Services - 9

Department of Defense - 9

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 9

Census Bureau Master Address File - 9

Indian Housing Information Center - 9

Review of Economics and Statistics - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

University of Michigan - 9

Some Other Race - 9

Yale University - 9

Office of Personnel Management - 9

UC Berkeley - 9

Business Employment Dynamics - 9

LEHD Program - 9

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 9

Arts, Entertainment - 8

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

1940 Census - 8

National Employer Survey - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Employment History File - 8

Census Edited File - 8

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 8

Boston College - 8

Linear Probability Models - 8

Business Formation Statistics - 8

Duke University - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Public Administration - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

American Economic Review - 8

American Statistical Association - 8

Stanford University - 7

Department of Agriculture - 7

Sloan Foundation - 7

Environmental Protection Agency - 7

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Harmonized System - 7

PIKed - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Supreme Court - 7

Master Earnings File - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Journal of Human Resources - 7

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 7

Center for Research in Security Prices - 7

Wholesale Trade - 6

Limited Liability Company - 6

CDF - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

NUMIDENT - 6

Georgetown University - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Census 2000 - 6

University of California Los Angeles - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

Census of Retail Trade - 6

Securities Data Company - 6

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Paycheck Protection Program - 5

Kauffman Firm Survey - 5

Columbia University - 5

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 5

New York Times - 5

2SLS - 5

Regression Discontinuity Design - 5

Stern School of Business - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

CAAA - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

WECD - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Federal Register - 4

World Trade Organization - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

George Mason University - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Foreign Direct Investment - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Educational Services - 4

IQR - 4

E32 - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

Summary Earnings Records - 4

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

MIT Press - 4

National Research Council - 4

Business Services - 4

COMPUSTAT - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

University of Toronto - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

IZA - 3

Ohio State University - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

AKM - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

European Union - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

TFPQ - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

John Voorheis - 18

John Haltiwanger - 15

Maggie R. Jones - 15

Javier Miranda - 13

Martha Stinson - 12

John M. Abowd - 12

J. David Brown - 10

Ron Jarmin - 10

Lucia Foster - 9

Adela Luque - 8

Sonya R. Porter - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Alicia Robb - 8

Timothy Bates - 8

Leah R. Clark - 7

Jonathan Eggleston - 7

Emin Dinlersoz - 7

Lars Vilhuber - 7

Lawrence Warren - 6

Moises Yi - 6

Thomas B. Foster - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 6

Kevin Rinz - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Christopher Goetz - 6

Thurston Domina - 5

Andrew Penner - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Jonathan Colmer - 5

Kristin Sandusky - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Jerome P. Reiter - 5

Julia I. Lane - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Robert Fairlie - 5

Alfred R Nucci - 5

Eva Lyubich - 4

Kendall Houghton - 4

Carl Lieberman - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Nathan Goldschlag - 4

Danielle H. Sandler - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Erika McEntarfer - 4

Fariha Kamal - 4

James M. Noon - 4

Shawn Klimek - 4

Cheryl Grim - 4

Mark J. Kutzbach - 4

C.J. Krizan - 4

Thomas Chemmanur - 4

Emily Penner - 3

Paul Y. Yoo - 3

Ethan Krohn - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Hubert P. Janicki - 3

Mark Ellis - 3

Lee Fiorio - 3

James R. Spletzer - 3

Joshua Mitchell - 3

Adam Bee - 3

Sabrina T. Howell - 3

Joseph Staudt - 3

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 3

Timothy Dunne - 3

Caroline Walker - 3

Matthew R. Graham - 3

Leticia Fernandez - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Quentin Brummet - 3

Daniel Weinberg - 3

Deborah Wagner - 3

Paige Ouimet - 3

Richard Burkhauser - 3

Shuaizhang Feng - 3

Stephen Jenkins - 3

Jeff Larrimore - 3

Debarshi Nandy - 3

employed - 74

survey - 68

employ - 62

labor - 55

earnings - 55

respondent - 54

recession - 54

population - 48

workforce - 45

irs - 45

employee - 44

enterprise - 43

payroll - 41

data - 36

agency - 36

entrepreneurship - 36

revenue - 35

entrepreneur - 35

census data - 33

econometric - 33

disadvantaged - 32

tax - 32

census bureau - 32

ethnicity - 32

statistical - 32

data census - 30

sale - 30

proprietorship - 29

hispanic - 29

economist - 29

salary - 28

earner - 28

minority - 27

estimating - 27

quarterly - 26

company - 26

sector - 26

venture - 26

poverty - 25

expenditure - 25

growth - 25

establishment - 24

immigrant - 24

1040 - 23

microdata - 23

record - 23

report - 23

ethnic - 23

macroeconomic - 23

socioeconomic - 22

disparity - 22

manufacturing - 22

corporation - 22

proprietor - 22

enrollment - 21

filing - 21

datasets - 20

gdp - 20

resident - 20

entrepreneurial - 20

worker - 20

incentive - 19

coverage - 19

taxpayer - 19

unemployed - 19

residence - 19

production - 19

federal - 18

citizen - 18

racial - 18

welfare - 18

market - 18

financial - 17

industrial - 17

employment data - 17

economic census - 17

disclosure - 16

residential - 16

use census - 16

job - 16

migrant - 16

imputation - 16

insurance - 16

longitudinal - 16

aggregate - 16

occupation - 15

economically - 15

medicaid - 15

assessed - 15

incorporated - 15

migration - 15

investment - 15

endogeneity - 15

family - 14

ssa - 14

race - 14

hiring - 14

housing - 14

estimation - 14

acquisition - 14

census survey - 13

export - 13

black - 13

earn - 13

census employment - 13

immigration - 13

statistician - 13

segregation - 12

income data - 12

intergenerational - 12

bias - 12

neighborhood - 12

employment statistics - 12

database - 12

percentile - 11

dependent - 11

impact - 11

employing - 11

white - 11

researcher - 11

metropolitan - 11

census use - 11

trend - 11

employee data - 11

ownership - 11

merger - 11

eligibility - 10

eligible - 10

enrolled - 10

environmental - 10

wealth - 10

layoff - 10

retirement - 10

discrimination - 10

state - 10

analysis - 10

census research - 10

subsidy - 9

organizational - 9

finance - 9

confidentiality - 9

public - 9

heterogeneity - 9

exemption - 9

mobility - 9

medicare - 9

innovation - 9

study - 9

firms census - 9

work census - 9

matching - 9

multinational - 9

depreciation - 9

labor statistics - 9

employment growth - 9

corporate - 9

owned businesses - 9

produce - 9

child - 8

borrower - 8

loan - 8

bank - 8

debt - 8

information - 8

parent - 8

poorer - 8

linked census - 8

migrate - 8

migrating - 8

survey income - 8

surveys censuses - 8

records census - 8

census household - 8

census responses - 8

startup - 8

information census - 8

rent - 8

census records - 8

healthcare - 8

department - 8

employment dynamics - 8

taxation - 8

accounting - 8

shareholder - 8

estimates employment - 8

opportunity - 8

census business - 8

household surveys - 7

lending - 7

funding - 7

privacy - 7

publicly - 7

emission - 7

pollution - 7

census years - 7

census linked - 7

decline - 7

relocation - 7

tenure - 7

moving - 7

mexican - 7

leverage - 7

shock - 7

poor - 7

insured - 7

health insurance - 7

workplace - 7

employment earnings - 7

retail - 7

longitudinal employer - 7

employment estimates - 7

econometrician - 7

demand - 7

business data - 7

employment wages - 7

censuses surveys - 7

state employment - 7

exporter - 7

founder - 7

efficiency - 7

investor - 7

inventory - 7

owner - 7

business owners - 7

characteristics businesses - 7

aggregation - 7

profitability - 7

shift - 6

education - 6

student - 6

school - 6

income children - 6

sampling - 6

lender - 6

restaurant - 6

warehousing - 6

nonemployer businesses - 6

segregated - 6

research census - 6

parental - 6

declining - 6

aging - 6

pension - 6

citizenship - 6

residing - 6

reside - 6

income distributions - 6

bankruptcy - 6

spillover - 6

patent - 6

patenting - 6

assessing - 6

associate - 6

2010 census - 6

workers earnings - 6

enrollee - 6

woman - 6

native - 6

discrepancy - 6

survey data - 6

turnover - 6

generation - 6

employer household - 6

foreign - 6

asian - 6

unemployment rates - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

businesses census - 6

clerical - 6

regional - 6

regression - 6

recessionary - 6

census file - 6

uninsured - 6

research - 6

statistical agencies - 6

profit - 6

compensation - 5

banking - 5

income individuals - 5

income households - 5

expense - 5

geographic - 5

pollution exposure - 5

import - 5

employment trends - 5

pandemic - 5

income survey - 5

pollutant - 5

hurricane - 5

saving - 5

retiree - 5

small firms - 5

prospect - 5

corp - 5

exogeneity - 5

estimator - 5

renter - 5

graduate - 5

insurance employer - 5

earnings employees - 5

empirical - 5

worker demographics - 5

subsidiary - 5

employment measures - 5

regress - 5

monopolistic - 5

yearly - 5

establishments data - 5

customer - 5

health - 5

reporting - 5

transition - 5

exporting - 5

classified - 5

wholesale - 5

firms export - 5

identifier - 5

employment unemployment - 5

franchising - 5

stock - 5

industry productivity - 5

productive - 5

relocating - 5

manufacturer - 5

insurance coverage - 5

econometrically - 5

hire - 4

grade - 4

sample - 4

survey households - 4

prevalence - 4

population survey - 4

financing - 4

borrowing - 4

credit - 4

family income - 4

household income - 4

security - 4

exposure - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

adoption - 4

geographically - 4

maternal - 4

business startups - 4

policy - 4

geography - 4

census 2020 - 4

university - 4

locality - 4

earnings workers - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

schooling - 4

earnings inequality - 4

fertility - 4

crime - 4

home - 4

mortality - 4

employment count - 4

competitor - 4

wages productivity - 4

shipment - 4

trading - 4

exporting firms - 4

wage changes - 4

union - 4

employment recession - 4

franchise - 4

franchisor - 4

franchised businesses - 4

franchise establishments - 4

productivity growth - 4

productivity dynamics - 4

wage data - 4

effects employment - 4

country - 4

business survival - 4

regulation - 4

takeover - 4

conglomerate - 4

technological - 4

specialization - 3

benefit - 3

agriculture - 3

fund - 3

mortgage - 3

consumption - 3

epa - 3

concentration - 3

tariff - 3

neighbor - 3

disability - 3

latino - 3

firms size - 3

income year - 3

disaster - 3

linkage - 3

birth - 3

commerce - 3

distribution - 3

career - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

insurance premiums - 3

insurer - 3

wage earnings - 3

rural - 3

indian - 3

matched - 3

trends employment - 3

recession exposure - 3

regressing - 3

cohort - 3

productivity estimates - 3

invention - 3

institutional - 3

immigrated - 3

earnings age - 3

small businesses - 3

retailer - 3

volatility - 3

importer - 3

custom - 3

mandate - 3

industry employment - 3

increase employment - 3

impact employment - 3

wages employment - 3

earnings growth - 3

wage regressions - 3

assimilation - 3

fluctuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

exported - 3

exports firms - 3

estimates productivity - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

equity - 3

employment effects - 3

subsidized - 3

relocate - 3

startup firms - 3

consolidated - 3

larger firms - 3

productivity shocks - 3

region - 3

ethnically - 3

wage effects - 3

urban - 3

analyst - 3

growth firms - 3

demography - 3

race census - 3

partnership - 3

coverage employer - 3

store - 3

development - 3

innovative - 3

younger firms - 3

firm growth - 3

firms grow - 3

firms employment - 3

managerial - 3

buyer - 3

cost - 3

profitable - 3

plants industry - 3

technical - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 296


  • Working Paper

    Work Organization and Cumulative Advantage

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-18

    Over decades of wage stagnation, researchers have argued that reorganizing work can boost pay for disadvantaged workers. But upgrading jobs could inadvertently shift hiring away from those workers, exacerbating their disadvantage. We theorize how work organization affects cumulative advantage in the labor market, or the extent to which high-paying positions are increasingly allocated to already-advantaged workers. Specifically, raising technical skill demands exacerbates cumulative advantage by shifting hiring towards higher-skilled applicants. In contrast, when employers increase autonomy or skills learned on-the-job, they raise wages to buy worker consent or commitment, rather than pre-existing skill. To test this idea, we match administrative earnings to task descriptions from job posts. We compare earnings for workers hired into the same occupation and firm, but under different task allocations. When employers raise complexity and autonomy, new hires' starting earnings increase and grow faster. However, while the earnings boost from complex, technical tasks shifts employment toward workers with higher prior earnings, worker selection changes less for tasks learned on-the-job and very little for high autonomy tasks. These results demonstrate how reorganizing work can interrupt cumulative advantage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Peer Income Exposure Across the Income Distribution

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-16

    Children from families across the income distribution attend public schools, making schools and classrooms potential sites for interaction between more- and less-affluent children. However, limited information exists regarding the extent of economic integration in these contexts. We merge educational administrative data from Oregon with measures of family income derived from IRS records to document student exposure to economically diverse school and classroom peers. Our findings indicate that affluent children in public schools are relatively isolated from their less affluent peers, while low- and middle-income students experience relatively even peer income distributions. Students from families in the top percentile of the income distribution attend schools where 20 percent of their peers, on average, come from the top five income percentiles. A large majority of the differences in peer exposure that we observe arise from the sorting of students across schools; sorting across classrooms within schools plays a substantially smaller role.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    U.S. Banks' Artificial Intelligence and Small Business Lending: Evidence from the Census Bureau's Annual Business Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-07

    Utilizing confidential microdata from the Census Bureau's new technology survey (technology module of the Annual Business Survey), we shed light on U.S. banks' use of artificial intelligence (AI) and its effect on their small business lending. We find that the percentage of banks using AI increases from 14% in 2017 to 43% in 2019. Linking banks' AI use to their small business lending, we find that banks with greater AI usage lend significantly more to distant borrowers, about whom they have less soft information. Using an instrumental variable based on banks' proximity to AI vendors, we show that AI's effect is likely causal. In contrast, we do not find similar effects for cloud systems, other types of software, or hardware surveyed by Census, highlighting AI's uniqueness. Moreover, AI's effect on distant lending is more pronounced in poorer areas and areas with less bank presence. Last, we find that banks with greater AI usage experience lower default rates among distant borrowers and charge these borrowers lower interest rates, suggesting that AI helps banks identify creditworthy borrowers at loan origination. Overall, our evidence suggests that AI helps banks reduce information asymmetry with borrowers, thereby enabling them to extend credit over greater distances.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Business Dynamics of Firms that Received Pandemic Relief Funding: Findings from a New Experimental BDS Data Product

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-05

    This paper describes a new experimental data product from the U.S. Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies: the Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) of firms that received Small Business Administration (SBA) pandemic funding. This new product, BDS-SBA COVID, expands the set of currently published BDS tables by linking loan-level program participation data from SBA to internal business microdata at the U.S. Census Bureau. The linked programs include the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), COVID Economic Injury Disaster Loans (COVID-EIDL), the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF), and Shuttered Venue Operators Grants (SVOG). Using these linked data, we tabulate annual firm and establishment counts, measures of job creation and destruction, and establishment entry and exit for recipients and non-recipients of program funds in 2020-2021. We further stratify the tables by timing of loan receipt and loan size, and business characteristics including geography, industry sector, firm size, and firm age. We find that for the youngest firms that received PPP, the timing of receipt mattered. Receiving an early loan correlated with a lower job destruction rate compared to non-recipients and businesses that received a later loan. For the smallest firms, simply participating in PPP was associated with lower employment loss. The timing of PPP receipt was also related to establishment exit rates. For businesses of nearly all ages, those that received an early loan exited at a lower rate in 2022 than later loan recipients.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Potential Bias When Using Administrative Data to Measure the Family Income of School-Aged Children

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-03

    Researchers and practitioners increasingly rely on administrative data sources to measure family income. However, administrative data sources are often incomplete in their coverage of the population, giving rise to potential bias in family income measures, particularly if coverage deficiencies are not well understood. We focus on the school-aged child population, due to its particular import to research and policy, and because of the unique challenges of linking children to family income information. We find that two of the most significant administrative sources of family income information that permit linking of children and parents'IRS Form 1040 and SNAP participation records'usefully complement each other, potentially reducing coverage bias when used together. In a case study considering how best to measure economic disadvantage rates in the public school student population, we demonstrate the sensitivity of family income statistics to assumptions about individuals who do not appear in administrative data sources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    CTC and ACTC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2020

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-76

    The Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) offer assistance to help ease the financial burden of families with children. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the CTC and ACTC covering tax year 2020. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2021 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify CTC/ACTC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2020, eligible taxpayers participated in the CTC and ACTC program at a rate of 93 percent while dollar participation was 91 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    EITC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2021

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-75

    The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), enacted in 1975, offers a refundable tax credit to low income working families. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the EITC covering tax year 2021. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2022 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify EITC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2021 eligible taxpayers participated in the EITC program at a rate of 78 percent while dollar participation was 81 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Privacy-Protected Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-74

    This paper introduces the Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame (Gridded EIF), a novel privacy-protected dataset derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's confidential Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) microdata infrastructure. The EIF combines comprehensive administrative records and survey data on the U.S. population with high-resolution geospatial information on environmental hazards. While access to the EIF is restricted due to the confidential nature of the underlying data, the Gridded EIF offers a broader research community the opportunity to glean insights from the data while preserving confidentiality. We describe the data and privacy protection process, and offer guidance on appropriate usage, presenting practical applications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Fighting Fire with Fire(fighting Foam): The Long Run Effects of PFAS Use at U.S. Military Installations

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-72

    Tens of millions of people in the U.S. may be exposed to drinking water contaminated with perand poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals (PFAS). We provide the first estimates of long-run economic costs from a major, early PFAS source: fire-fighting foam. We combine the timing of its adoption with variation in the presence of fire training areas at U.S. military installations in the 1970s to estimate exposure effects for millions of individuals using natality records and restricted administrative data. We document diminished birthweights, college attendance, and earnings, illustrating a pollution externality from military training and unregulated chemicals as a determinant of economic opportunity.
    View Full Paper PDF