CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Office of Management and Budget'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 27

Center for Economic Studies - 26

Internal Revenue Service - 26

Current Population Survey - 23

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 22

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 22

North American Industry Classification System - 22

Protected Identification Key - 21

2010 Census - 20

Social Security Administration - 19

Social Security - 18

Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Social Security Number - 14

Employer Identification Numbers - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

Person Validation System - 13

Economic Census - 12

Some Other Race - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 10

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 10

Standard Industrial Classification - 10

Business Register - 10

Person Identification Validation System - 10

Census 2000 - 10

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Disclosure Review Board - 9

Postal Service - 8

National Science Foundation - 8

Ordinary Least Squares - 8

Administrative Records - 8

County Business Patterns - 7

Decennial Census - 7

1940 Census - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 7

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 6

W-2 - 6

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Master Address File - 6

Census Numident - 6

Census of Manufactures - 6

Service Annual Survey - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Census Bureau Business Register - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Census Edited File - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

National Center for Health Statistics - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 5

Social and Economic Supplement - 5

Longitudinal Research Database - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Small Business Administration - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Cornell University - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

Centers for Medicare - 4

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

Indian Housing Information Center - 4

Department of Defense - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Company Organization Survey - 4

University of Michigan - 4

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 3

Technical Services - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Federal Register - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Harmonized System - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 3

MAFID - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

Business Formation Statistics - 3

Columbia University - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

United Nations - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Research Data Center - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Harvard University - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

ethnicity - 19

population - 19

hispanic - 18

respondent - 16

ethnic - 15

survey - 15

race - 13

racial - 12

manufacturing - 12

industrial - 12

employed - 11

workforce - 11

census responses - 11

census bureau - 10

statistical - 9

census data - 9

minority - 9

immigrant - 9

production - 8

economist - 8

manufacturer - 8

salary - 8

white - 8

agency - 8

latino - 7

metropolitan - 7

earnings - 7

employ - 7

recession - 7

discrimination - 7

citizen - 7

resident - 7

black - 7

sale - 7

labor - 6

census survey - 6

2010 census - 6

disparity - 6

poverty - 6

enterprise - 6

expenditure - 6

sector - 5

estimating - 5

growth - 5

urban - 5

city - 5

revenue - 5

warehousing - 5

occupation - 5

mexican - 5

immigration - 5

market - 5

econometric - 5

data - 5

surveys censuses - 5

establishment - 5

asian - 4

payroll - 4

macroeconomic - 4

company - 4

export - 4

midwest - 4

job - 4

ethnically - 4

use census - 4

economic census - 4

employee - 4

imputation - 4

residence - 4

quarterly - 4

trend - 4

entrepreneur - 4

employment data - 4

segregation - 4

proprietor - 4

wholesale - 4

native - 4

race census - 4

indian - 3

report - 3

census 2020 - 3

technological - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

innovation - 3

area - 3

town - 3

urbanization - 3

district - 3

neighborhood - 3

urbanized - 3

incentive - 3

outsourced - 3

ancestry - 3

analysis - 3

hiring - 3

workplace - 3

woman - 3

earner - 3

census household - 3

citizenship - 3

department - 3

record - 3

venture - 3

gdp - 3

employment statistics - 3

pandemic - 3

suburb - 3

enrollment - 3

clerical - 3

socioeconomic - 3

associate - 3

multinational - 3

proprietorship - 3

segregated - 3

censuses surveys - 3

data census - 3

census records - 3

interracial - 3

datasets - 3

produce - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 60


  • Working Paper

    Differences in Disability Insurance Allowance Rates

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-54

    Allowance rates for disability insurance applications vary by race and ethnicity, but it is unclear to what extent these differences are artifacts of other differing socio-economic and health characteristics, or selection issues in SSA's race and ethnicity data. This paper uses the 2015 American Community Survey linked to 2015-2019 SSA administrative data to investigate DI application allowance rates among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic applicants aged 25-65. The analysis uses regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting to estimate differences in allowance rates among applicants who are similar on observable characteristics. Relative to raw comparisons, differences by race and ethnicity in multivariate analyses are substantially smaller in magnitude and are generally not statistically significant.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-36

    Timely business-level measures of work from home (WFH) are scarce for the U.S. economy. We review prior survey-based efforts to quantify the incidence and character of WFH and describe new questions that we developed and fielded for the Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS). Drawing on more than 150,000 firm-level responses to the BTOS, we obtain four main findings. First, nearly a third of businesses have employees who work from home, with tremendous variation across sectors. The share of businesses with WFH employees is nearly ten times larger in the Information sector than in Accommodation and Food Services. Second, employees work from home about 1 day per week, on average, and businesses expect similar WFH levels in five years. Third, feasibility aside, businesses' largest concern with WFH relates to productivity. Seven percent of businesses find that onsite work is more productive, while two percent find that WFH is more productive. Fourth, there is a low level of tracking and monitoring of WFH activities, with 70% of firms reporting they do not track employee days in the office and 75% reporting they do not monitor employees when they work from home. These lessons serve as a starting point for enhancing WFH-related content in the American Community Survey and other household surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Rise of Industrial AI in America: Microfoundations of the Productivity J-curve(s)

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-27

    We examine the prevalence and productivity dynamics of artificial intelligence (AI) in American manufacturing. Working with the Census Bureau to collect detailed large-scale data for 2017 and 2021, we focus on AI-related technologies with industrial applications. We find causal evidence of J-curve-shaped returns, where short-term performance losses precede longer-term gains. Consistent with costly adjustment taking place within core production processes, industrial AI use increases work-in-progress inventory, investment in industrial robots, and labor shedding, while harming productivity and profitability in the short run. These losses are unevenly distributed, concentrating among older businesses while being mitigated by growth-oriented business strategies and within-firm spillovers. Dynamics, however, matter: earlier (pre-2017) adopters exhibit stronger growth over time, conditional on survival. Notably, among older establishments, abandonment of structured production-management practices accounts for roughly one-third of these losses, revealing a specific channel through which intangible factors shape AI's impact. Taken together, these results provide novel evidence on the microfoundations of technology J-curves, identifying mechanisms and illuminating how and why they differ across firm types. These findings extend our understanding of modern General Purpose Technologies, explaining why their economic impact'exemplified here by AI'may initially disappoint, particularly in contexts dominated by older, established firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Applying Current Core Based Statistical Area Standards to Historical Census Data, 1940-2020

    January 2025

    Authors: Todd Gardner

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-10

    In the middle of the twentieth century, the Bureau of the Budget, in conjunction with the Census Bureau and other federal statistical agencies, introduced a widely used unit of statistical geography, the county-based Standard Metropolitan Area. Metropolitan definitions since then have been generally regarded as comparable, but methodological changes have resulted in comparability issues, particularly among the largest and most complex metro areas. With the 2000 census came an effort to simplify the rules for defining metro areas. This study attempts to gather all available historical geographic and commuting data to apply the current rules for defining metro areas to create comparable statistical geography covering the period from 1940 to 2020. The changes that accompanied the 2000 census also brought a new category, "Micropolitan Statistical Areas," which established a metro hierarchy. This research expands on this approach, using a more elaborate hierarchy based on the size of urban cores. The areas as delineated in this paper provide a consistent set of statistical geography that can be used in a wide variety of applications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: Tip Reporting at U.S. Restaurants, 2005-2018

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-68

    Tipping is a significant form of compensation for many restaurant jobs, but it is poorly measured and therefore not well understood. We combine several large administrative and survey datasets and document patterns in tip reporting that are consistent with systematic under-reporting of tip income. Our analysis indicates that although the vast majority of tipped workers do report earning some tips, the dollar value of tips is under-reported and is sensitive to reporting incentives. In total, we estimate that about eight billion in tips paid at full-service, single-location, restaurants were not captured in tax data annually over the period 2005-2018. Due to changes in payment methods and reporting incentives, tip reporting has increased over time. Our findings have implications for downstream measures dependent on accurate measures of compensation including poverty measurement among tipped restaurant workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The China Shock Revisited: Job Reallocation and Industry Switching in U.S. Labor Markets

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-65

    Using confidential administrative data from the U.S. Census Bureau we revisit how the rise in Chinese import penetration has reshaped U.S. local labor markets. Local labor markets more exposed to the China shock experienced larger reallocation from manufacturing to services jobs. Most of this reallocation occurred within firms that simultaneously contracted manufacturing operations while expanding employment in services. Notably, about 40% of the manufacturing job loss effect is due to continuing establishments switching their primary activity from manufacturing to trade-related services such as research, management, and wholesale. The effects of Chinese import penetration vary by local labor market characteristics. In areas with high human capital, including much of the West Coast and large cities, job reallocation from manufacturing to services has been substantial. In areas with low human capital and a high initial manufacturing share, including much of the Midwest and the South, we find limited job reallocation. We estimate this differential response to the China shock accounts for half of the 1997-2007 job growth gap between these regions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    After the Storm: How Emergency Liquidity Helps Small Businesses Following Natural Disasters

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-20

    Does emergency credit prevent long-term financial distress? We study the causal effects of government-provided recovery loans to small businesses following natural disasters. The rapid financial injection might enable viable firms to survive and grow or might hobble precarious firms with more risk and interest obligations. We show that the loans reduce exit and bankruptcy, increase employment and revenue, unlock private credit, and reduce delinquency. These effects, especially the crowding-in of private credit, appear to reflect resolving uncertainty about repair. We do not find capital reallocation away from neighboring firms and see some evidence of positive spillovers on local entry.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Examining Racial Identity Responses Among People with Middle Eastern and North African Ancestry in the American Community Survey

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-14

    People with Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) backgrounds living in the United States are defined and classified as White by current Federal standards for race and ethnicity, yet many MENA people do not identify as White in surveys, such as those conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. Instead, they often select 'Some Other Race', if it is provided, and write in MENA responses such as Arab, Iranian, or Middle Eastern. In processing survey data for public release, the Census Bureau classifies these responses as White in accordance with Federal guidance set by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Research that uses these edited public data relies on limited information on MENA people's racial identification. To address this limitation, we obtained unedited race responses in the nationally representative American Community Survey from 2005-2019 to better understand how people of MENA ancestry report their race. We also use these data to compare the demographic, cultural, socioeconomic, and contextual characteristics of MENA individuals who identify as White versus those who do not identify as White. We find that one in four MENA people do not select White alone as their racial identity, despite official guidance that defines 'White' as people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. A variety of individual and contextual factors are associated with this choice, and some of these factors operate differently for U.S.-born and foreign-born MENA people living in the United States.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census: Full Technical Report

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63R

    For the last half-century, it has been a common and accepted practice for statistical agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, to adopt different strategies to protect the confidentiality of aggregate tabular data products from those used to protect the individual records contained in publicly released microdata products. This strategy was premised on the assumption that the aggregation used to generate tabular data products made the resulting statistics inherently less disclosive than the microdata from which they were tabulated. Consistent with this common assumption, the 2010 Census of Population and Housing in the U.S. used different disclosure limitation rules for its tabular and microdata publications. This paper demonstrates that, in the context of disclosure limitation for the 2010 Census, the assumption that tabular data are inherently less disclosive than their underlying microdata is fundamentally flawed. The 2010 Census published more than 150 billion aggregate statistics in 180 table sets. Most of these tables were published at the most detailed geographic level'individual census blocks, which can have populations as small as one person. Using only 34 of the published table sets, we reconstructed microdata records including five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) from the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using only published data, an attacker using our methods can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. We further confirm, through reidentification studies, that an attacker can, within census blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with race and ethnicity different from the modal person on the census block) with 95% accuracy. Having shown the vulnerabilities inherent to the disclosure limitation methods used for the 2010 Census, we proceed to demonstrate that the more robust disclosure limitation framework used for the 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction. Finally, we show that available alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System would either fail to protect confidentiality, or would overly degrade the statistics' utility for the primary statutory use case: redrawing the boundaries of all of the nation's legislative and voting districts in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act. You are reading the full technical report. For the summary paper see https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.4a1ebf70.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63

    Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF