CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'entrepreneur'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 77

North American Industry Classification System - 48

Internal Revenue Service - 41

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 36

Center for Economic Studies - 35

Employer Identification Numbers - 34

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 31

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 30

National Science Foundation - 29

Survey of Business Owners - 28

Characteristics of Business Owners - 28

Business Dynamics Statistics - 27

Ordinary Least Squares - 24

Kauffman Foundation - 23

Business Register - 20

Small Business Administration - 18

Federal Reserve Bank - 18

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 17

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 16

Census Bureau Business Register - 16

National Bureau of Economic Research - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Decennial Census - 14

American Community Survey - 14

County Business Patterns - 14

Current Population Survey - 13

Initial Public Offering - 13

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 13

International Trade Research Report - 13

Economic Census - 12

Social Security Number - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Social Security - 12

Special Sworn Status - 12

Federal Reserve System - 12

Patent and Trademark Office - 11

Disclosure Review Board - 11

Kauffman Firm Survey - 11

Department of Homeland Security - 10

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 10

Annual Business Survey - 10

University of Maryland - 9

W-2 - 9

Social Security Administration - 9

Protected Identification Key - 9

Nonemployer Statistics - 9

Guzman and Stern - 8

National Employer Survey - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

Linear Probability Models - 7

Business Formation Statistics - 7

Technical Services - 7

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 7

Total Factor Productivity - 7

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Accommodation and Food Services - 7

Health Care and Social Assistance - 7

George Mason University - 7

Hypothesis 2 - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Columbia University - 6

Arts, Entertainment - 6

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 6

World Bank - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

University of Chicago - 6

Business Employment Dynamics - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Limited Liability Company - 5

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 5

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

2010 Census - 5

University of Toronto - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Census Numident - 5

Research Data Center - 5

Board of Governors - 5

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

Educational Services - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Oil and Gas Extraction - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

University of California - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

VAR - 4

Harvard Business School - 4

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

Longitudinal Research Database - 4

PSID - 4

MIT Press - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

IBM - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

Retirement History Survey - 3

European Union - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Boston College - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

Census of Manufactures - 3

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

Harvard University - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Cornell University - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Employment History File - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

entrepreneurship - 96

entrepreneurial - 76

venture - 61

enterprise - 38

proprietorship - 32

company - 32

employed - 31

proprietor - 27

growth - 27

investment - 26

employ - 25

startup - 25

recession - 24

corporation - 23

employee - 22

financial - 21

founder - 19

acquisition - 19

minority - 18

earner - 18

finance - 17

opportunity - 16

innovation - 16

hispanic - 15

earnings - 15

investor - 15

employment growth - 14

organizational - 14

business startups - 14

ownership - 14

immigrant - 14

labor - 13

econometric - 13

financing - 13

workforce - 13

ethnicity - 13

startup firms - 13

wealth - 13

establishment - 13

funding - 12

patent - 12

loan - 12

sale - 12

sector - 12

innovate - 11

market - 11

hiring - 10

revenue - 10

immigrant entrepreneurs - 10

quarterly - 10

startups employees - 9

employment entrepreneurship - 9

industrial - 9

bank - 9

black - 8

longitudinal - 8

estimating - 8

incorporated - 8

nonemployer businesses - 8

macroeconomic - 8

younger firms - 8

manufacturing - 8

prospect - 8

innovative - 8

corporate - 8

borrower - 8

lending - 8

asian - 8

firms grow - 8

businesses grow - 7

economically - 7

patenting - 7

ethnic - 7

inventory - 7

gdp - 7

competitor - 7

lender - 7

owner - 7

profitability - 7

hire - 6

tenure - 6

economist - 6

debt - 6

disadvantaged - 6

employees startups - 6

innovator - 6

immigration - 6

metropolitan - 6

franchising - 6

merger - 6

recessionary - 6

endogeneity - 6

firm growth - 6

growth firms - 6

profitable - 6

owned businesses - 6

bankruptcy - 6

socioeconomic - 5

earn - 5

small businesses - 5

technological - 5

investing - 5

equity - 5

wholesale - 5

agency - 5

migrant - 5

native - 5

invention - 5

geographically - 5

banking - 5

neighborhood - 5

survey - 5

capital - 5

profit - 5

white - 5

trend - 5

borrowing - 5

firms young - 5

business survival - 5

competitive - 5

characteristics businesses - 5

decline - 5

minority business - 5

stock - 4

fund - 4

invest - 4

innovating - 4

rent - 4

researcher - 4

developed - 4

leverage - 4

diversification - 4

strategic - 4

black business - 4

business data - 4

customer - 4

retail - 4

acquirer - 4

unemployed - 4

shareholder - 4

filing - 4

production - 4

productivity growth - 4

growth productivity - 4

business owners - 4

franchise - 4

franchisor - 4

franchised businesses - 4

endogenous - 4

turnover - 3

entry productivity - 3

salary - 3

institutional - 3

advancement - 3

asset - 3

security - 3

disclosure - 3

employment data - 3

firms employment - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

corp - 3

rural - 3

economic census - 3

population - 3

small firms - 3

restaurant - 3

mexican - 3

collateral - 3

occupation - 3

payroll - 3

employment dynamics - 3

partnership - 3

growth employment - 3

employment firms - 3

franchise establishments - 3

credit - 3

endowment - 3

disparity - 3

competitiveness - 3

city - 3

subsidiary - 3

regional - 3

economic growth - 3

econometrically - 3

asian immigrants - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 118


  • Working Paper

    Who Hires Whom? Entrepreneurial Backgrounds and Labor Market Opportunities

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-45

    What are the implications of unequal access to entrepreneurial careers for labor markets? Using data from the U.S. Census and LinkedIn profiles, we document that entrepreneurs are significantly more likely to hire workers from similar social backgrounds (gender, race, age, education, etc.). These effects are quantitatively large across several demographic dimensions. For example, female employee share at female-founded startups is 36.4pp higher after controlling for industry-by-metro area-by-cohort fixed effects, with corresponding estimates of 51.2pp for Blacks, 37.3pp for Hispanics, and 11.3pp for non-college individuals. Large effects are present in high-growth startups, across industries and occupations, and remain stable across new firm cohorts. In addition, we find that these differences persist out to at least 20 years. We use wage data and an AKM research design to untangle whether the relative differences are driven by labor demand or labor supply effects. We find that demand drives the differences: group-specific wage decompositions show that new firms pay higher relative wages to individuals from similar backgrounds to the entrepreneur. Using these estimates, we calibrate a model of entrepreneurship with heterogeneous ability and production functions, and assess the impacts on relative wage from reducing access barriers to entrepreneurship.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Evolving Impact of Founders on Startup Employee Retention

    March 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-21

    Founders are known to attract prospective employees by signaling their startup's mission, culture, and potential. But do they also shape who stays? And if so, does the founder's influence diminish as the startup matures? Using matched employer-employee data from the U.S. Census, we address these questions, especially focusing on cases of founder premature death to identify plausibly exogenous exits. We find that founder departures significantly increase employee turnover. These effects are stronger in older and larger startups. Further analyses show that the impact of founder departure is more salient among employees who had longer shared tenure or have the same sex as the founder. These patterns suggest that employees develop complementarities with founders over time'an alignment in skills, relationships, or culture'that reinforce founders' influence as startups mature.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expectations versus Reality in Business Formation

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-11

    Using administrative data on 17 million U.S. business applications linked to outcomes, we compare potential entrants' expectations about employer entry and first-year employment with realizations. On average, applicants overestimate employment, mainly because many expect to enter but do not. Among those who expect and achieve entry, employment is typically underestimated. Expected employment predicts entry and realized employment, but conditional on entry realized employment rises less than one-for-one with expectations. Expectation errors are highly heterogeneous and systematically related to application characteristics and local economic conditions, and they predict near-term employment outcomes. A parsimonious model with heterogeneous priors, learning, and pre-entry selection rationalizes these patterns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Double-Pane Glass Ceiling: Commercial Engagement and the Female-Male Earnings Gap for Faculty

    September 2025

    Authors: Joseph Staudt

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-68

    I use administrative data from universities (UMETRICS) linked to the universe of confidential W-2 and 1040-C tax records to measure faculty commercial engagement and its role in female-male earnings gaps. Female faculty are 20 percentage points less likely to engage commercially, with the entire gap driven by self-employment. The raw earnings gap is $63,000 on a base of $162,000 and non-university earnings account for $18,000 (29 percent) of this total. Thus, while university pay explains most of the gap, commercial engagement substantially amplifies it. Earnings gaps appear in all components of non-university pay ' self-employment, and work for incumbent, young/startup, high-tech, and non-high-tech firms ' and remain large, though attenuated, after controlling publications, patents, field, university, scientific resources, age, marital status, childbearing, and demographics. Gaps widen as faculty move up the earnings distribution, and commercial engagement becomes a larger contributor. Men and women engage with similar industries, but men earn more in all shared industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Owners and the Self-Employed: 33 Million (and Counting!)

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-60

    Entrepreneurs are known to be key drivers of economic growth, and the rise of online platforms and the broader 'gig economy' has led self-employment to surge in recent decades. Yet the young and small businesses associated with this activity are often absent from economic data. In this paper, we explore a novel longitudinal dataset that covers the owners of tens of millions of the smallest businesses: those without employees. We produce three new sets of statistics on the rapidly growing set of nonemployer businesses. First, we measure transitions between self-employment and wage and salary jobs. Second, we describe nonemployer business entry and exit, as well as transitions between legal form (e.g., sole proprietorship to S corporation). Finally, we link owners to their nonemployer businesses and examine the dynamics of business ownership.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technifying Ventures

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-49

    How do advanced technology adoption and venture capital (VC) funding impact employment and growth? An analysis of data from the US Census Bureau suggests that while both advanced technology use and VC funding matter on their own for firm outcomes, their joint presence is most strongly correlated with higher employment levels. VC presence is linked with a high increase in employment, though primarily among a limited subset of firms. In contrast, technology adoption is associated with a smaller rise in employment, yet it influences a considerably larger number of firms. A model of startups is created, focusing on decisions to use advanced technology and seek VC funding. The model is compared with firm-level data on employment, advanced technology use, and VC investment. Several thought experiments are conducted using the model. Some experiments assess the importance of advanced technology and VC in the economy. Others examine the reallocation effects across firms with different technology choices and funding sources in response to shifts in taxes and subsidies.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamics of High-Growth Young Firms and the Role of Venture Capitalists

    June 2025

    Authors: Yoshiki Ando

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-38

    Motivated by the substantial growth and upfront investments of venture capital (VC) backed firms observed in administrative US Census data, this paper develops a firm dynamics model over the life cycle. In the model, startups choose the source of financing from VC, Angel investors, or banks, depending on their growth potential, and invest in innovation. The calibrated model explains the life-cycle dynamics of firms with different sources of financing and implies that venture capitalists' advice accounts for around 22% of the growth of VC-backed firms. A counterfactual economy without VC financing would lose aggregate consumption by around 0.4%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Impact Investing and Worker Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-30

    Impact investors claim to distinguish themselves from traditional venture capital and growth equity investors by also pursuing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Whether they successfully do so in practice is unclear. We use confidential Census Bureau microdata to assess worker outcomes across portfolio companies. Impact investors are more likely than other private equity firms to fund businesses in economically disadvantaged areas, and the performance of these companies lags behind those held by traditional private investors. We show that post-funding impact-backed firms are more likely to hire minorities, unskilled workers, and individuals with lower historical earnings, perhaps reflecting the higher representation of minorities in top positions. They also allocate wage increases more favorably to minorities and rank-and-file workers than VC-backed firms. Our results are consistent with impact investors and their portfolio companies acting according to non-pecuniary social goals and thus are not consistent with mere window dressing or cosmetic changes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Startup Dynamics: Transitioning from Nonemployer Firms to Employer Firms, Survival, and Job Creation

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-26

    Understanding the dynamics of startup businesses' growth, exit, and survival is crucial for fostering entrepreneurship. Among the nearly 30 million registered businesses in the United States, fewer than six million have employees beyond the business owners. This research addresses the gap in understanding which companies transition to employer businesses and the mechanisms behind this process. Job creation remains a critical concern for policymakers, researchers, and advocacy groups. This study aims to illuminate the transition from non-employer businesses to employer businesses and explore job creation by new startups. Leveraging newly available microdata from the U.S. Census Bureau, we seek to gain deeper insights into firm survival, job creation by startups, and the transition from non-employer to employer status.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Financing, Ownership, and Performance: A Novel, Longitudinal Firm-Level Database

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-73

    The Census Bureau's Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) underpins many studies of firm-level behavior. It tracks longitudinally all employers in the nonfarm private sector but lacks information about business financing and owner characteristics. We address this shortcoming by linking LBD observations to firm-level data drawn from several large Census Bureau surveys. The resulting Longitudinal Employer, Owner, and Financing (LEOF) database contains more than 3 million observations at the firm-year level with information about start-up financing, current financing, owner demographics, ownership structure, profitability, and owner aspirations ' all linked to annual firm-level employment data since the firm hired its first employee. Using the LEOF database, we document trends in owner demographics and financing patterns and investigate how these business characteristics relate to firm-level employment outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF