CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'disadvantaged'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 37

Internal Revenue Service - 32

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 29

Protected Identification Key - 26

Decennial Census - 22

Current Population Survey - 19

Social Security Number - 19

Ordinary Least Squares - 17

Person Validation System - 16

Disclosure Review Board - 15

Housing and Urban Development - 14

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 14

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Social Security Administration - 13

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 11

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 11

National Science Foundation - 11

Department of Education - 10

Person Identification Validation System - 10

W-2 - 10

Social Security - 10

Research Data Center - 10

Center for Economic Studies - 10

National Bureau of Economic Research - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Department of Economics - 9

National Center for Health Statistics - 9

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 8

2010 Census - 8

Earned Income Tax Credit - 8

Personally Identifiable Information - 8

Federal Reserve Bank - 8

Census Numident - 8

1940 Census - 8

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 8

Department of Health and Human Services - 8

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 7

National Institutes of Health - 7

Census 2000 - 7

Special Sworn Status - 7

Characteristics of Business Owners - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

MTO - 6

North American Industry Classification System - 6

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 6

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 6

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 6

Master Address File - 6

Harvard University - 6

Yale University - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

COVID-19 - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Regional Economic Information System - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Environmental Protection Agency - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

American Economic Association - 4

New York University - 4

Centers for Medicare - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

General Education Development - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

Stanford University - 4

Urban Institute - 4

Journal of Human Resources - 4

Administrative Records - 4

University of Michigan - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

PSID - 4

Longitudinal Business Database - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Employer Identification Numbers - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

Data Management System - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Postal Service - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Penn State University - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Cornell University - 3

University of Maryland - 3

poverty - 27

minority - 25

population - 24

disparity - 23

neighborhood - 22

racial - 21

ethnicity - 19

hispanic - 19

resident - 18

black - 18

segregation - 18

welfare - 17

socioeconomic - 17

housing - 16

race - 16

ethnic - 16

white - 15

enrollment - 15

family - 15

intergenerational - 13

residential - 12

discrimination - 11

immigrant - 11

survey - 10

segregated - 10

metropolitan - 10

residence - 9

employed - 9

labor - 9

enrolled - 9

schooling - 9

eligibility - 9

medicaid - 9

census data - 9

poorer - 8

parent - 8

migrant - 8

maternal - 8

employ - 8

rent - 7

workforce - 7

household income - 7

income households - 7

school - 7

immigration - 7

unemployed - 7

community - 6

affluent - 6

renter - 6

entrepreneur - 6

respondent - 6

census bureau - 6

child - 6

hiring - 6

education - 6

poor - 6

student - 6

enterprise - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

rural - 5

citizen - 5

relocation - 5

venture - 5

impact - 5

urban - 5

suburb - 5

tax - 5

income children - 5

residential segregation - 5

recession - 5

mobility - 5

residing - 5

subsidized - 5

fertility - 5

generation - 5

econometric - 5

eligible - 5

mexican - 5

subsidy - 5

census research - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

earnings - 4

dependent - 4

family income - 4

economically - 4

emission - 4

pollution - 4

environmental - 4

pollution exposure - 4

expenditure - 4

spending - 4

neighbor - 4

migration - 4

reside - 4

statistical - 4

home - 4

enrollee - 4

grade - 4

pregnancy - 4

economist - 4

estimating - 4

mother - 4

parental - 4

sociology - 3

company - 3

funding - 3

earner - 3

suburbanization - 3

irs - 3

income data - 3

1040 - 3

concentration - 3

exposure - 3

heterogeneity - 3

geographically - 3

moving - 3

migrating - 3

gdp - 3

relocating - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

birth - 3

unobserved - 3

wealth - 3

parents income - 3

mortality - 3

asian - 3

prevalence - 3

immigrated - 3

interracial - 3

ancestry - 3

incentive - 3

opportunity - 3

endogeneity - 3

pollutant - 3

inference - 3

policy - 3

census use - 3

census survey - 3

ethnically - 3

discriminatory - 3

estimation - 3

profitability - 3

sale - 3

black business - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 77


  • Working Paper

    The Rural/Urban Volunteering Divide

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-42

    Are rural residents more likely to volunteer than those living in urban places? Although early sociological theory posited that rural residents were more likely to experience social bonds connecting them to their community, increasing their odds of volunteer engagement, empirical support is limited. Drawing upon the full population of rural and urban respondents to the United States Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015), we found that rural respondents are more likely to report volunteering compared to urban respondents, although these differences are decreasing over time. Moreover, we found that propensities for rural and urban volunteerism vary based on differences in both individual and place-based characteristics; further, the size of these effects differ across rural and urban places. These findings have important implications for theory and empirical analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Decline of Volunteering in the United States: Is it the Economy?

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-41

    This article investigates the complex interactions between local and national economic contexts and volunteering behavior. We examine three dimensions of local economic context'economic disadvantage (e.g., the percentage of families living in poverty), income inequality, and economic growth (e.g., the change in median household income) and the impact of a national/global economic jolt'the Great Recession. Analysis of data from the Current Population Survey's (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015) reveals. Individuals who live in places characterized by economic disadvantage and economic inequality are less likely to volunteer than individuals in more advantaged, equitable communities. The recession had a dampening effect on volunteering overall, but it had the largest dampening effect on individual volunteering in communities with above average rates of income equality and higher rates of economic growth. While individuals living in rural communities were more likely to volunteer than their urban counterparts before the recession, rural/urban differences disappear after the recession.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effects of Eviction on Children

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-34

    Eviction may be an important channel for the intergenerational transmission of poverty, and concerns about its effects on children are often raised as a rationale for tenant protection policies. We study how eviction impacts children's home environment, school engagement, educational achievement, and high school completion by assembling new data sets linking eviction court records in Chicago and New York to administrative public school records and restricted Census records. To disentangle the consequences of eviction from the effects of correlated sources of economic distress, we use a research design based on the random assignment of court cases to judges who vary in their leniency. We find that eviction increases children's residential mobility, homelessness, and likelihood of doubling up with grandparents or other adults. Eviction also disrupts school engagement, causing increased absences and school changes. While we find little impact on elementary and middle school test scores, eviction substantially reduces high school course credits. Lastly, we find that eviction reduces high school graduation and use a novel bounding method to show that this finding is not driven by differential attrition. The disruptive effects of eviction appear worse for older children and boys. Our evidence suggests that the impact of eviction on children runs through the disruption to the home environment or school engagement rather than deterioration in school or neighborhood quality, and may be moderated by access to family support networks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Impact Investing and Worker Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-30

    Impact investors claim to distinguish themselves from traditional venture capital and growth equity investors by also pursuing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Whether they successfully do so in practice is unclear. We use confidential Census Bureau microdata to assess worker outcomes across portfolio companies. Impact investors are more likely than other private equity firms to fund businesses in economically disadvantaged areas, and the performance of these companies lags behind those held by traditional private investors. We show that post-funding impact-backed firms are more likely to hire minorities, unskilled workers, and individuals with lower historical earnings, perhaps reflecting the higher representation of minorities in top positions. They also allocate wage increases more favorably to minorities and rank-and-file workers than VC-backed firms. Our results are consistent with impact investors and their portfolio companies acting according to non-pecuniary social goals and thus are not consistent with mere window dressing or cosmetic changes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Re-assessing the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-23

    We use detailed location information from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) database to develop new evidence on the effects of spatial mismatch on the relative earnings of Black workers in large US cities. We classify workplaces by the size of the pay premiums they offer in a two-way fixed effects model, providing a simple metric for defining 'good' jobs. We show that: (a) Black workers earn nearly the same average wage premiums as whites; (b) in most cities Black workers live closer to jobs, and closer to good jobs, than do whites; (c) Black workers typically commute shorter distances than whites; and (d) people who commute further earn higher average pay premiums, but the elasticity with respect to distance traveled is slightly lower for Black workers. We conclude that geographic proximity to good jobs is unlikely to be a major source of the racial earnings gaps in major U.S. cities today.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Potential Bias When Using Administrative Data to Measure the Family Income of School-Aged Children

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-03

    Researchers and practitioners increasingly rely on administrative data sources to measure family income. However, administrative data sources are often incomplete in their coverage of the population, giving rise to potential bias in family income measures, particularly if coverage deficiencies are not well understood. We focus on the school-aged child population, due to its particular import to research and policy, and because of the unique challenges of linking children to family income information. We find that two of the most significant administrative sources of family income information that permit linking of children and parents'IRS Form 1040 and SNAP participation records'usefully complement each other, potentially reducing coverage bias when used together. In a case study considering how best to measure economic disadvantage rates in the public school student population, we demonstrate the sensitivity of family income statistics to assumptions about individuals who do not appear in administrative data sources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Fighting Fire with Fire(fighting Foam): The Long Run Effects of PFAS Use at U.S. Military Installations

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-72

    Tens of millions of people in the U.S. may be exposed to drinking water contaminated with perand poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals (PFAS). We provide the first estimates of long-run economic costs from a major, early PFAS source: fire-fighting foam. We combine the timing of its adoption with variation in the presence of fire training areas at U.S. military installations in the 1970s to estimate exposure effects for millions of individuals using natality records and restricted administrative data. We document diminished birthweights, college attendance, and earnings, illustrating a pollution externality from military training and unregulated chemicals as a determinant of economic opportunity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    From Marcy to Madison Square? The Effects of Growing Up in Public Housing on Early Adulthood Outcomes

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-67

    This paper studies the effects of growing up in public housing in New York City on children's long-run outcomes. Using linked administrative data, we exploit variation in the age children move into public housing to estimate the effects of spending an additional year of childhood in public housing on a range of economic and social outcomes in early adulthood. We find that childhood exposure to public housing improves labor market outcomes and reduces participation in federal safety net programs, particularly for children from the most disadvantaged families. Additionally, we find there is some heterogeneity in impacts across public housing developments. Developments located in neighborhoods with relatively fewer renters and higher household incomes are better for children overall. Our estimate of the marginal value of public funds suggests that for every $1 the government spends per child on public housing, children receive $1.40 in benefits, including $2.30 for children from the most disadvantaged families.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Separate but Not Equal: The Uneven Cost of Residential Segregation for Network-Based Hiring

    October 2024

    Authors: Tam Mai

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-56

    This paper studies how residential segregation by race and by education affects job search via neighbor networks. Using confidential microdata from the US Census Bureau, I measure segregation for each characteristic at both the individual level and the neighborhood level. My findings are manifold. At the individual level, future coworkership with new neighbors on the same block is less likely among segregated individuals than among integrated workers, irrespective of races and levels of schooling. The impacts are most adverse for the most socioeconomically disadvantaged demographics: Blacks and those without a high school education. At the block level, however, higher segregation along either dimension raises the likelihood of any future coworkership on the block for all racial or educational groups. My identification strategy, capitalizing on data granularity, allows a causal interpretation of these results. Together, they point to the coexistence of homophily and in-group competition for job opportunities in linking residential segregation to neighbor-based informal hiring. My subtle findings have important implications for policy-making.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Internal Migration in the U.S. During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-50

    Survey and administrative internal migration data disagree on whether the COVID-19 pandemic increased or decreased mobility in the U.S. Moreover, though scholars have theorized and documented migration in response to environmental hazards and economic shocks, the novel conditions posed by a global pandemic make it difficult to hypothesize whether and how American migration might change as a result. We link individual-level data from the United States Postal Service's National Change of Address (NCOA) registry to American Community Survey (ACS) and Current Population Survey (CPS-ASEC) responses and other administrative records to document changes in the level, geography, and composition of migrant flows between 2019 and 2021. We find a 2% increase in address changes between 2019 and 2020, representing an additional 603,000 moves, driven primarily by young adults, earners at the extremes of the income distribution, and individuals (as opposed to families) moving over longer distances. Though the number of address changes returned to pre-pandemic levels in 2021, the pandemic-era geographic and compositional shifts in favor of longer distance moves away from the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic regions toward the South and in favor of younger, individual movers persisted. We also show that at least part of the disconnect between survey, media, and administrative/third-party migration data sources stems from the apparent misreporting of address changes on Census Bureau surveys. Among ACS and CPS-ASEC householders linked to NCOA data and filing a permanent change of address in their 1-year survey response reference period, only around 68% of ACS and 49% of CPS-ASEC householders also reported living in a different residence one year ago in their survey response.
    View Full Paper PDF