CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Longitudinal Business Database'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

North American Industry Classification System - 240

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 145

Center for Economic Studies - 132

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 130

Employer Identification Numbers - 113

Internal Revenue Service - 112

Standard Industrial Classification - 112

National Science Foundation - 106

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 101

Ordinary Least Squares - 100

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 99

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 98

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 97

National Bureau of Economic Research - 96

Total Factor Productivity - 91

Business Register - 89

Economic Census - 87

Business Dynamics Statistics - 79

Census of Manufactures - 75

Census Bureau Business Register - 70

Disclosure Review Board - 67

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 64

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 63

Federal Reserve Bank - 62

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 62

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 56

Current Population Survey - 55

American Community Survey - 52

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 50

County Business Patterns - 48

Social Security Administration - 40

Special Sworn Status - 40

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 39

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 39

Kauffman Foundation - 38

Patent and Trademark Office - 37

Department of Homeland Security - 36

Research Data Center - 34

Decennial Census - 33

International Trade Research Report - 33

Longitudinal Research Database - 33

University of Chicago - 33

Cobb-Douglas - 31

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 31

Service Annual Survey - 31

University of Maryland - 30

Federal Reserve System - 29

Survey of Business Owners - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 29

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 28

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 28

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 26

Retail Trade - 26

Small Business Administration - 25

Social Security - 25

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 25

World Bank - 25

Department of Labor - 23

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 23

Wholesale Trade - 23

Securities and Exchange Commission - 22

Protected Identification Key - 22

Company Organization Survey - 21

Department of Economics - 21

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 21

Social Security Number - 21

World Trade Organization - 20

Technical Services - 20

W-2 - 20

Initial Public Offering - 20

New York University - 19

Business Employment Dynamics - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

Harmonized System - 17

Cornell University - 17

Individual Characteristics File - 17

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Board of Governors - 16

Annual Business Survey - 16

University of Michigan - 16

Census of Retail Trade - 16

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

Postal Service - 16

Accommodation and Food Services - 16

Employer Characteristics File - 15

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 15

Center for Research in Security Prices - 15

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

Unemployment Insurance - 15

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 15

Characteristics of Business Owners - 15

Generalized Method of Moments - 15

Employment History File - 15

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

General Accounting Office - 14

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 14

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 14

American Economic Association - 14

Local Employment Dynamics - 14

American Economic Review - 14

Boston College - 13

2010 Census - 13

Department of Agriculture - 13

NBER Summer Institute - 13

European Union - 13

Energy Information Administration - 13

Occupational Employment Statistics - 13

Arts, Entertainment - 13

Core Based Statistical Area - 13

COMPUSTAT - 13

University of California Los Angeles - 13

Review of Economics and Statistics - 13

Business Services - 12

Establishment Micro Properties - 12

COVID-19 - 12

IQR - 12

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 12

Foreign Direct Investment - 12

Public Administration - 12

Journal of Economic Literature - 12

North American Industry Classi - 12

Linear Probability Models - 11

National Establishment Time Series - 11

Federal Trade Commission - 11

Guzman and Stern - 11

Limited Liability Company - 11

Labor Productivity - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Stanford University - 11

IBM - 11

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 11

Kauffman Firm Survey - 11

Retirement History Survey - 11

Bureau of Labor - 11

Harvard University - 11

Permanent Plant Number - 11

Department of Commerce - 10

Customs and Border Protection - 10

Harvard Business School - 10

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 10

TFPQ - 10

Business Formation Statistics - 10

Department of Energy - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 10

Health Care and Social Assistance - 10

University of Toronto - 10

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 10

Federal Register - 9

Agriculture, Forestry - 9

Columbia University - 9

Journal of Political Economy - 9

Professional Services - 9

New York Times - 9

Sloan Foundation - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Statistics Canada - 9

State Energy Data System - 9

Duke University - 9

European Commission - 8

International Trade Commission - 8

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

Current Employment Statistics - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

University of California - 8

National Institutes of Health - 8

National Employer Survey - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Hypothesis 2 - 8

Educational Services - 8

Census Numident - 8

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 8

Data Management System - 8

George Mason University - 8

North American Free Trade Agreement - 8

Journal of International Economics - 8

2SLS - 7

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 7

TFPR - 7

Department of Justice - 7

University of Texas - 7

Employer-Household Dynamics - 7

Person Validation System - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

United States Census Bureau - 7

Ohio State University - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

VAR - 7

E32 - 7

Net Present Value - 7

Census of Services - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Northwestern University - 7

University of Minnesota - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 7

Securities Data Company - 7

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 7

Chicago RDC - 7

Wal-Mart - 7

Supreme Court - 6

Oil and Gas Extraction - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

CAAA - 6

AKM - 6

IZA - 6

Princeton University - 6

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Master Address File - 6

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

MIT Press - 6

Business Master File - 6

Department of State - 5

Disability Insurance - 5

Research and Development - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Federal Statistical System - 5

HHS - 5

Washington University - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Georgetown University - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Computer Network Use Supplement - 5

United Nations - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Commodity Flow Survey - 5

PSID - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Form W-2 - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

COVID - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Insurance Information Institute - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

JOLTS - 4

1940 Census - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Stern School of Business - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Yale University - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

DOB - 4

National Research Council - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Administrative Records - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Fabricated Metal Products - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

ASEC - 3

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Value Added - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Princeton University Press - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Penn State University - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

John Haltiwanger - 41

Lucia Foster - 30

Ron Jarmin - 26

Javier Miranda - 25

Emin Dinlersoz - 19

Nathan Goldschlag - 17

Fariha Kamal - 13

Cheryl Grim - 12

Martha Stinson - 11

William Kerr - 11

Henry Hyatt - 10

Teresa C. Fort - 10

J. David Brown - 10

Zoltan Wolf - 9

Shawn Klimek - 9

Emek Basker - 8

Erik Brynjolfsson - 8

J. Daniel Kim - 8

Catherine Buffington - 8

Peter Schott - 8

Nikolas Zolas - 8

C.J. Krizan - 8

John S. Earle - 7

Erika McEntarfer - 7

Xavier Giroud - 7

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 7

G. Jacob Blackwood - 6

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Zachary Kroff - 6

Steven J. Davis - 6

Nicholas Bloom - 6

Rebecca Zarutskie - 6

Paige Ouimet - 6

Benjamin Pugsley - 6

Lars Vilhuber - 6

Christopher Goetz - 5

Tania Babina - 5

John M. Abowd - 5

Timothy Dunne - 5

Hyunseob Kim - 5

Mariko Sakakibara - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Nuri Ersahin - 5

Joseph Staudt - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Kristin Sandusky - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Kyle Handley - 4

Adela Luque - 4

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Jerome P. Reiter - 4

Ufuk Akcigit - 4

Kevin L. McKinney - 4

Justin Pierce - 4

Holger M. Mueller - 4

Scott Ohlmacher - 4

Peter J. Klenow - 4

Matthias Kehrig - 4

J. Bradford Jensen - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

Jagadeesh Sivadasan - 4

Robert Seamans - 3

J. Frank Li - 3

Yueyuan Ma - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Jeremy Greenwood - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Gordon M Phillips - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Ryan Monarch - 3

Wenting Ma - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Veronika Penciakova - 3

Daron Acemoglu - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Sari Pekkala Kerr - 3

Chang-Tai Hsieh - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Geoffrey Tate - 3

Liu Yang - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Asha Sundaram - 3

Aysegül Sahin - 3

Julia I. Lane - 3

Craig Wesley Carpenter - 3

Robert Kulick - 3

Chad Syverson - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Rustom M. Irani - 3

Edward Glaeser - 3

Allan Collard-Wexler - 3

Mercedes Delgado - 3

growth - 93

manufacturing - 92

employ - 90

market - 89

entrepreneurship - 83

employed - 78

labor - 77

entrepreneur - 77

recession - 77

sector - 76

macroeconomic - 73

company - 72

industrial - 71

workforce - 71

employee - 68

production - 68

revenue - 66

enterprise - 66

econometric - 65

investment - 63

sale - 62

gdp - 55

entrepreneurial - 53

innovation - 53

economist - 53

economically - 50

payroll - 49

venture - 49

earnings - 47

acquisition - 47

export - 46

finance - 43

expenditure - 42

financial - 41

endogeneity - 41

establishment - 40

quarterly - 38

estimating - 38

patent - 37

employment growth - 34

organizational - 33

spillover - 32

manufacturer - 32

corporation - 32

agency - 31

demand - 31

multinational - 30

survey - 30

trend - 30

merger - 30

exporter - 29

worker - 29

produce - 28

hiring - 27

inventory - 27

proprietor - 27

wholesale - 27

proprietorship - 27

leverage - 26

patenting - 26

technological - 25

aggregate - 25

import - 25

investor - 24

debt - 24

startup - 24

corporate - 23

financing - 23

profit - 23

loan - 22

accounting - 21

incorporated - 21

job - 21

productivity growth - 21

incentive - 20

bank - 20

innovative - 20

occupation - 20

subsidiary - 20

trading - 19

efficiency - 19

innovate - 19

earner - 19

disclosure - 19

productive - 19

regional - 19

monopolistic - 18

longitudinal - 18

invention - 18

report - 18

competitor - 18

employment dynamics - 18

equity - 17

funding - 17

bankruptcy - 17

lender - 17

founder - 17

profitability - 17

estimation - 17

lending - 17

statistical - 17

hire - 17

importer - 17

metropolitan - 17

firms grow - 17

exporting - 16

regress - 16

shock - 16

geographically - 16

data - 16

technology - 15

declining - 15

decline - 15

tariff - 15

impact - 15

banking - 15

stock - 15

economic census - 15

regulation - 14

supplier - 14

exported - 14

turnover - 14

region - 14

econometrician - 14

borrowing - 14

microdata - 14

opportunity - 14

retail - 14

data census - 14

respondent - 14

prospect - 14

growth productivity - 14

researcher - 14

foreign - 14

immigrant - 14

industry productivity - 14

custom - 13

invest - 13

population - 13

creditor - 13

productivity dispersion - 13

heterogeneity - 13

unemployed - 13

salary - 13

census bureau - 13

area - 13

firms export - 12

investing - 12

depreciation - 12

employment statistics - 12

diversification - 12

borrower - 12

retailer - 12

country - 12

wages productivity - 12

employment data - 12

younger firms - 12

warehousing - 12

rent - 12

sourcing - 12

firms productivity - 12

state - 12

startup firms - 12

business data - 12

regression - 12

shipment - 11

regulatory - 11

minority - 11

federal - 11

liquidation - 11

innovating - 11

exogeneity - 11

layoff - 11

database - 11

census data - 11

record - 11

labor markets - 11

factory - 11

business startups - 11

rural - 11

innovator - 11

endogenous - 11

city - 11

corp - 11

manager - 11

aggregate productivity - 11

ownership - 11

acquirer - 11

labor statistics - 10

census employment - 10

monopolistically - 10

strategic - 10

collateral - 10

patented - 10

relocation - 10

earn - 10

firms patents - 10

employment estimates - 10

trends employment - 10

firms young - 10

sectoral - 10

producing - 10

larger firms - 10

contract - 10

ethnicity - 10

geography - 10

datasets - 10

labor productivity - 10

retirement - 9

fund - 9

union - 9

bankrupt - 9

startups employees - 9

shift - 9

oligopolistic - 9

emission - 9

epa - 9

credit - 9

businesses grow - 9

workplace - 9

employment trends - 9

shareholder - 9

growth employment - 9

international trade - 9

hispanic - 9

migrant - 9

importing - 9

immigration - 9

research - 9

firm growth - 9

growth firms - 9

study - 9

outsourcing - 9

employing - 9

wealth - 9

consumer - 9

productivity measures - 9

takeover - 9

institutional - 8

debtor - 8

tenure - 8

regressing - 8

compensation - 8

borrow - 8

housing - 8

product - 8

specialization - 8

executive - 8

commerce - 8

competitiveness - 8

patents firms - 8

wage growth - 8

firms employment - 8

globalization - 8

exporters multinationals - 8

development - 8

outsourced - 8

imported - 8

firms size - 8

subsidy - 8

firm dynamics - 8

estimates employment - 8

externality - 8

productivity firms - 8

industry employment - 8

conglomerate - 8

census business - 7

unemployment rates - 7

average - 7

irs - 7

productivity distribution - 7

bias - 7

aggregation - 7

entry productivity - 7

pollution - 7

mortgage - 7

information census - 7

consolidated - 7

dispersion productivity - 7

measures productivity - 7

nonemployer businesses - 7

recessionary - 7

technology adoption - 7

census survey - 7

productivity estimates - 7

productivity shocks - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

developed - 7

patenting firms - 7

work census - 7

employment firms - 7

share - 7

firms trade - 7

exporting firms - 7

multinational firms - 7

reallocation productivity - 7

neighborhood - 7

geographic - 7

trademark - 7

downturn - 7

employee data - 7

agriculture - 7

regional economic - 7

cost - 7

buyer - 7

restructuring - 7

firms exporting - 6

tax - 6

restaurant - 6

spending - 6

unobserved - 6

employment distribution - 6

environmental - 6

polluting - 6

trader - 6

advancement - 6

innovation patenting - 6

migration - 6

warehouse - 6

sector productivity - 6

firm innovation - 6

firm patenting - 6

factor productivity - 6

innovation productivity - 6

employees startups - 6

worker demographics - 6

firms age - 6

regressors - 6

poverty - 6

good - 6

industry wages - 6

urban - 6

analysis - 6

decade - 6

competitive - 6

industry concentration - 6

firms census - 6

immigrant entrepreneurs - 6

confidentiality - 6

statistician - 6

coverage - 6

matching - 6

managerial - 6

management - 6

productivity wage - 6

capital - 6

businesses census - 6

rates employment - 6

fluctuation - 6

aging - 6

volatility - 6

asset - 5

pension - 5

discrimination - 5

filing - 5

productivity capital - 5

state employment - 5

impact employment - 5

forecast - 5

diversified - 5

tech - 5

socioeconomic - 5

department - 5

store - 5

grocery - 5

disaster - 5

prevalence - 5

security - 5

rates productivity - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

wage regressions - 5

autoregressive - 5

employment production - 5

job growth - 5

employment entrepreneurship - 5

industry variation - 5

diversify - 5

plant productivity - 5

publicly - 5

transition - 5

pricing - 5

imputation - 5

recession exposure - 5

rate - 5

equilibrium - 5

elasticity - 5

price - 5

use census - 5

exogenous - 5

estimator - 5

yield - 5

employment wages - 5

census research - 5

foreign trade - 5

research census - 5

censuses surveys - 5

exports firms - 5

profitable - 5

pollutant - 5

residential - 5

agglomeration - 5

2010 census - 4

mandate - 4

census disclosure - 4

employment declines - 4

establishments data - 4

employment count - 4

productivity variation - 4

analyst - 4

employment flows - 4

relocate - 4

university - 4

productivity analysis - 4

risk - 4

hurricane - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

indian - 4

native - 4

firms import - 4

midwest - 4

immigrant workers - 4

marketing - 4

productivity increases - 4

industry growth - 4

location - 4

ethnic - 4

enforcement - 4

privacy - 4

insurance - 4

healthcare - 4

consumption - 4

electricity - 4

electricity prices - 4

black - 4

employer household - 4

level productivity - 4

reporting - 4

workers earnings - 4

earnings workers - 4

plants industry - 4

productivity size - 4

local economic - 4

saving - 4

franchising - 4

downstream - 4

recession employment - 4

census years - 4

census use - 4

business survival - 4

customer - 4

gain - 4

productivity plants - 4

earnings growth - 4

wages production - 4

linked census - 4

utilization - 4

clerical - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

trade models - 4

generation - 4

information - 4

inference - 4

retailing - 4

statistical agencies - 4

resident - 4

agglomeration economies - 4

cluster - 4

regional industry - 4

regional industries - 4

restriction - 3

racial - 3

disparity - 3

quantity - 3

deviation - 3

measures employment - 3

applicant - 3

home - 3

graduate - 3

associate - 3

identifier - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

merchandise - 3

percentile - 3

www census - 3

oligopoly - 3

disadvantaged - 3

town - 3

advantage - 3

wages employment - 3

poorer - 3

migrate - 3

earnings age - 3

capital productivity - 3

economic growth - 3

small firms - 3

career - 3

expense - 3

relocating - 3

plant employment - 3

policymakers - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

medicare - 3

energy prices - 3

renewable - 3

policy - 3

productivity differences - 3

regulation productivity - 3

employment earnings - 3

earnings employees - 3

effect wages - 3

wage data - 3

firms plants - 3

owner - 3

industries estimate - 3

technical - 3

industrialized - 3

taxation - 3

white - 3

asian - 3

subsidized - 3

woman - 3

increase employment - 3

earnings inequality - 3

export growth - 3

trends labor - 3

survey data - 3

employed census - 3

surveys censuses - 3

employment measures - 3

rurality - 3

agricultural - 3

substitute - 3

franchise - 3

model - 3

supermarket - 3

empirical - 3

valuation - 3

demography - 3

plant investment - 3

environmental regulation - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 406


  • Working Paper

    CTRL+EXP+DEL: the Domestic Costs of U.S. Export Controls

    August 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-50

    National-security restrictions on exports constrain exporters' market access, but empirical evidence on their domestic costs is limited. We leverage data on export transactions that includes the product classifications used to administer U.S. export controls to document a doubling in the share of U.S. exports subject to controls between 2010 and 2024 and a skewed firm-size distribution among firms that export controlled products. We then exploit the 2014 U.S. restriction on exports to Russia as a natural experiment to examine the impact of export controls on firm-level outcomes. These controls not only reduced U.S. firms' probability of exporting targeted goods to Russia but also had indirect effects: they reduced affected firms' exports of other products and to other destinations and lowered affected firms' average payroll. Our findings imply that the domestic costs of export controls extend beyond direct restrictions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Desperate Capital Breeds Productivity Loss: Evidence From Public Pension Investments in Private Equity

    July 2026

    Authors: Vrinda Mittal

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-47

    I study investments of U.S. public pensions in private equity (PE), and trace them to ultimate micro assets'target firms which PE funds invest in, using micro-data on private investments combined with confidential U.S. Census data. I show that more severely underfunded public pensions receive lower average PE returns, and match with smaller GPs on average, than less underfunded pensions. Consistent with matching and returns, firms financed by most underfunded public pensions and smallest PE funds face labor productivity decreases. I introduce a novel instrument'public unionization'in support of underfunding positions driving selection into funds. Lastly, I evaluate alternate mechanisms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Minimum Wages and the Rise of the Robots

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-42

    This paper studies how minimum wage policy affects firms' adoption of automation'technologies. Using both state-level measures of robot exposure and novel plant-level'data on industrial robot imports linked to U.S. Census microdata from 1992'2021,'we show that increases in minimum wages raise the likelihood of robot adoption in'manufacturing. Our preferred identification exploits discontinuities at state borders,'comparing otherwise similar firms exposed to different wage floors. Across specifications, a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage increases robot adoption by roughly'8 percent relative to the mean.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Happens to Contractors After States Ban Affirmative Action?

    July 2026

    Authors: Benjamin V. Rosa

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-41

    Using restricted Census business records, I explore how banning affirmative action in state contracting affects minority- and women-owned business enterprises (MWBEs). I find that ending affirmative action led MWBE contractors to gradually downsize, with the most pronounced reductions in force experienced by Black-owned businesses and larger MWBEs. Despite these workforce changes, existing MWBEs were no more likely to shut down than other businesses. New MWBEs were relatively less common after a state's ban, highlighting how bans can shift the demographic composition of new contractors. A calibrated model suggests bans are equivalent to considerable reductions in MWBE productivity and scrap values.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: How Much Do Tips Bunch at Reporting Thresholds?

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-40

    We study the importance of bunching in the context of tip-income reporting by workers at full-service, single-unit restaurants in the United States. Using tax reports at both the individual and the employer levels, we show that reported tip income varies with minimum-wage laws that provide an incentive for tipped workers to report some, but not necessarily all, of their tips. As a result, reported tips bunch at the minimum required threshold. We quantify missing tips due to bunching at nearly $63 million per year in 2018 dollars, on average over the period 2005-2018. Bunching is stronger for jobs at small employers and in the earlier part of the time series and declined monotonically from 2010 to 2018. Using restaurant-level revenue data, we also estimate the total value of unreported tips assuming an average tip rate of 12%. We find that tips are missing throughout the distribution. All told, missing tips exceed $4 billion per year, implying that bunching explains only 1.5% of all missing tips.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    New U.S. Business Establishments: Surging or Stalling?

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-36

    Since the 1990s, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has reported much more rapid growth in U.S. private sector employer establishments than has the Census Bureau' the gap reached roughly 1.6 million by 2023. Using linked BLS-Census microdata, we document two main drivers. First, a large and growing number of employers providing services to the elderly and persons with disabilities are in scope for the BLS frame but not the Census Bureau's. Second, many firms appear with substantially more establishments in the BLS frame. These discrepancies substantially affect the measured establishment size distribution and quantitative policy analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Real Effects of Bankruptcy Forum Shopping

    May 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-29

    Many non-Delaware firms strategically file for bankruptcy in Delaware. Should this "forum shopping" be allowed? This question has motivated nine proposed congressional bills over decades of policy debate. Using a novel natural experiment and Census-Bureau microdata, we inform this debate. Comparing similar firms within a Delaware-adjacent state, we show that proximity to Delaware predicts forum shopping. Instrumenting with proximity, we find that forum shopping causally: (i) prevents closures'and liquidations, (ii) shortens bankruptcies, (iii) boosts creditor recovery, and (iv) increases post-bankruptcy employment by 24.8%. Proximity to Delaware is uncorrelated with growth for not-yet-bankrupt or never-bankrupt firms, validating the exclusion restriction.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Adoption of Non-Rival Inputs and Firm Scope

    April 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-28

    Custom software is distinct from other types of capital in that it is non-rival'once a firm makes an investment in custom software, it can be used simultaneously across its many establishments. Using confidential U.S. Census data, we document that while firms with more establishments are more likely to invest in custom software, they spend less on it as a share of total capital expenditure. We explain these empirical patterns by developing a model that incorporates the non-rivalry of custom software. In the model, firms choose whether to adopt custom software, the intensity of their investment, and their scope, balancing the cost of managing multiple establishments with the increasing returns to scope from the nonrivalrous custom software investment. Using the calibrated model, we assess the extent to which the decline in the rental rate of custom software over the past 40 years can account for a number of macroeconomic trends, including increases in firm scope and concentration.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Allocating Misallocation: Decomposing Measures of Aggregate Allocative Efficiency

    April 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-26

    We explore sources of measured misallocation using establishment data from U.S. manufacturing industries. We decompose standard revenue productivity dispersion statistics into contributions by dispersion in revenue margins over costs and dispersion in input cost shares across plants. We establish a formal link between these components and measured allocative efficiency. The results indicate the components contribute similarly to apparent rising misallocation in US manufacturing. We use the mapping between distortions that influence these distinct components to explore the relationship between inferred distortions and mechanisms that influence one or both sources of revenue productivity dispersion. Finally, we show rising misallocation in the US manufacturing sector in the last several decades is pervasive, and yet a few industries account for over half of the aggregate decline.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance Extensions, Labor Market Concentration, and Match Quality

    April 2026

    Authors: David N. Wasser

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-24

    I investigate whether the effects of UI extensions are different for workers exposed to higher levels of local labor market concentration, a potential source of employer market power. I exploit measurement error in state unemployment rates that led to quasi-random assignment of UI durations in the U.S. during the Great Recession. Using matched employer-employee data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, I find that UI extensions lengthen nonemployment durations by one week and cause economically meaningful but not statistically significant increases in earnings. The UI-earnings effect is significantly lower at higher levels of concentration, while there is no difference in the UI-duration effect. The lower UI-earnings effect is driven by the extremes of the distribution of concentration. My results suggest that match improvements from UI are attenuated at higher levels of concentration.
    View Full Paper PDF