CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'report'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 35

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 33

North American Industry Classification System - 31

Internal Revenue Service - 26

National Science Foundation - 26

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 19

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 18

Longitudinal Business Database - 18

Employer Identification Numbers - 18

American Community Survey - 17

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 17

Economic Census - 17

Current Population Survey - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 15

Business Register - 15

Social Security Administration - 15

Cornell University - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 13

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

County Business Patterns - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Research Data Center - 12

Census of Manufactures - 11

Longitudinal Research Database - 11

Social Security Number - 10

Decennial Census - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Social Security - 9

Federal Reserve Bank - 9

Census Bureau Business Register - 9

Protected Identification Key - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 7

LEHD Program - 7

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 6

National Bureau of Economic Research - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

Master Address File - 6

Postal Service - 6

Special Sworn Status - 6

Department of Labor - 6

American Statistical Association - 6

COVID-19 - 5

Total Factor Productivity - 5

2010 Census - 5

Multiple Worksite Report - 5

LODES - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Unemployment Insurance - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Ordinary Least Squares - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Economic Research Service - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Individual Characteristics File - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Characteristics of Business Owners - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Board of Governors - 4

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Department of Agriculture - 3

Person Validation System - 3

National Research Council - 3

Department of Education - 3

Stanford University - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Federal Statistical System - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

University of Maryland - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Business Master File - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

survey - 32

statistical - 28

census bureau - 24

respondent - 24

data - 22

data census - 20

payroll - 19

agency - 19

microdata - 18

population - 16

record - 14

census data - 14

employed - 14

quarterly - 14

disclosure - 13

workforce - 13

use census - 12

analysis - 12

research census - 11

reporting - 11

employ - 11

estimating - 10

aggregate - 10

employee - 10

enterprise - 10

study - 9

economic census - 9

labor - 9

sector - 9

research - 9

earnings - 9

researcher - 9

federal - 8

prevalence - 8

census employment - 8

census survey - 8

datasets - 8

econometric - 8

2010 census - 7

irs - 7

employment statistics - 7

census research - 7

confidentiality - 7

information - 7

manufacturing - 7

longitudinal - 7

business data - 7

imputation - 7

sale - 7

statistician - 7

privacy - 7

medicaid - 6

revenue - 6

employment data - 6

coverage - 6

recession - 6

database - 6

organizational - 6

aggregation - 6

expenditure - 6

statistical agencies - 6

labor statistics - 6

census use - 5

sample census - 5

censuses surveys - 5

enrollee - 5

www census - 5

percentile - 5

accounting - 5

work census - 5

information census - 5

company - 5

estimation - 5

economist - 5

market - 5

department - 5

discrepancy - 5

export - 5

macroeconomic - 5

yearly - 5

incorporated - 5

trend - 5

employment count - 5

average - 5

socioeconomic - 4

eligibility - 4

available census - 4

enrolled - 4

state - 4

assessed - 4

census disclosure - 4

employee data - 4

census years - 4

employment estimates - 4

assessing - 4

production - 4

workplace - 4

employment measures - 4

manager - 4

tenure - 4

firms census - 4

management - 4

insurance - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

industrial - 4

aging - 4

worker - 4

poverty - 3

provided census - 3

census estimates - 3

income data - 3

paper census - 3

ethnicity - 3

hispanic - 3

enrollment - 3

productive - 3

financial - 3

efficiency - 3

gdp - 3

decade - 3

investment - 3

impact - 3

residential - 3

resident - 3

estimates employment - 3

policymakers - 3

medicare - 3

publicly - 3

salary - 3

employment earnings - 3

productivity growth - 3

manufacturer - 3

acquisition - 3

businesses census - 3

workforce indicators - 3

import - 3

exporting - 3

exporter - 3

surveys censuses - 3

filing - 3

individuals census - 3

uninsured - 3

establishment - 3

performance - 3

analyst - 3

firms export - 3

firms exporting - 3

measure - 3

census business - 3

empirical - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 67


  • Working Paper

    Access to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) at the State and Substate Levels: Meaning and Measurement

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-44

    This study estimates eligibility and access rates for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) administrative data linked with American Community Survey (ACS) data. This study is one result of a long-term research collaboration among USDA's Economic Research Service; the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; USDA's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS); and participating state WIC agencies.'By analyzing WIC participation at the state and substate levels, the report provides insights into program reach and demographic differences. The findings confirm that the Census Bureau estimates meet high statistical reliability standards, providing valuable data for program officials and managers, and other stakeholders, to enhance program outreach and effectiveness. A key focus of the report is the comparison between Census Bureau and USDA, FNS estimates, which differ in methodology and measurement scope.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Integrating Administrative and Survey Data to Estimate WIC Eligibility and Access

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-43

    The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides benefits to low-income, nutritionally at-risk women, infants, and children. To administer WIC, officials and program managers at the federal and state level want to understand who is eligible for the program, who among the eligible population chooses to participate, and who is not accessing the program despite their eligibility. Novel individual-level data linkages between restricted-use WIC Administrative Records and the American Community Survey provide WIC access rates estimated at the state and county levels, as well as estimates disaggregated by the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and their households. These estimates are developed by the Census-FNS-ERS Joint Project, a research partnership among the U.S. Census Bureau, the US Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service and Economic Research Service, and state WIC agencies that provide the requisite WIC administrative data to the Census Bureau. This paper details and evaluates our current data linkage and estimation methods, reports results, and identifies areas for improvement and further research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gifted Identification Across the Distribution of Family Income

    December 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-73

    Currently, 6.1 percent of K-12 students in the United States receive gifted education. Using education and IRS data that provide information on students and their family income, we show pronounced differences in who schools identify as gifted across the distribution of family income. Under 4 percent of students in the lowest income percentile are identified as gifted, compared with 20 percent of those in the top income percentile. Income-based differences persist after accounting for student test scores and exist across students of different sexes and racial/ethnic groups, underscoring the importance of family resources for gifted identification in schools.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measurement Matters: Financial Reporting and Productivity

    December 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-72

    We examine how differences in financial reporting practices shape firm productivity. Leveraging new audit questions in the U.S. Census Bureau's 2021 Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), and complementary tax return data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and detailed financial records from Sageworks, we find that (i) variation in reporting quality explains 10-20 percent of intra-industry total factor productivity dispersion, and (ii) evidence of complementarity between the effects of financial audits and management practices driving firm productivity. We then examine the underlying mechanisms. First, audits function as a managerial technology, improving the precision of internal information and raising efficiency, with stronger effects in competitive, low-margin industries and among younger firms. Second, exploiting cross-state variation in tax incentives, we show that audits constrain underreporting and mitigate the downward bias in measured productivity. Together, these results highlight the underrated importance of financial reporting quality driving firm productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-57

    For the last half-century, it has been a common and accepted practice for statistical agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, to adopt different strategies to protect the confidentiality of aggregate tabular data products from those used to protect the individual records contained in publicly released microdata products. This strategy was premised on the assumption that the aggregation used to generate tabular data products made the resulting statistics inherently less disclosive than the microdata from which they were tabulated. Consistent with this common assumption, the 2010 Census of Population and Housing in the U.S. used different disclosure limitation rules for its tabular and microdata publications. This paper demonstrates that, in the context of disclosure limitation for the 2010 Census, the assumption that tabular data are inherently less disclosive than their underlying microdata is fundamentally flawed. The 2010 Census published more than 150 billion aggregate statistics in 180 table sets. Most of these tables were published at the most detailed geographic level'individual census blocks, which can have populations as small as one person. Using only 34 of the published table sets, we reconstructed microdata records including five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) from the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using only published data, an attacker using our methods can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. We further confirm, through reidentification studies, that an attacker can, within census blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with race and ethnicity different from the modal person on the census block) with 95% accuracy. Having shown the vulnerabilities inherent to the disclosure limitation methods used for the 2010 Census, we proceed to demonstrate that the more robust disclosure limitation framework used for the 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction. Finally, we show that available alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System would either fail to protect confidentiality, or would overly degrade the statistics' utility for the primary statutory use case: redrawing the boundaries of all of the nation's legislative and voting districts in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Investments under Risk: Evidence from Hurricane Strikes

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-43

    We demonstrate that firms with plants in areas subject to a significant hurricane strike reduce their capital expenditures at the hurricane-affected plants and shift capital expenditures to plants in non-hurricane-affected areas. This effect is not present prior to 1997 and only appears from 1997 on. Our evidence is consistent with the possibility that a significant climate event such as the signing of the Kyoto Protocol raised the salience of the perceived risk from actual hurricane strikes and shifted firm behavior.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-36

    Timely business-level measures of work from home (WFH) are scarce for the U.S. economy. We review prior survey-based efforts to quantify the incidence and character of WFH and describe new questions that we developed and fielded for the Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS). Drawing on more than 150,000 firm-level responses to the BTOS, we obtain four main findings. First, nearly a third of businesses have employees who work from home, with tremendous variation across sectors. The share of businesses with WFH employees is nearly ten times larger in the Information sector than in Accommodation and Food Services. Second, employees work from home about 1 day per week, on average, and businesses expect similar WFH levels in five years. Third, feasibility aside, businesses' largest concern with WFH relates to productivity. Seven percent of businesses find that onsite work is more productive, while two percent find that WFH is more productive. Fourth, there is a low level of tracking and monitoring of WFH activities, with 70% of firms reporting they do not track employee days in the office and 75% reporting they do not monitor employees when they work from home. These lessons serve as a starting point for enhancing WFH-related content in the American Community Survey and other household surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Census Historical Environmental Impacts Frame

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-66

    The Census Bureau's Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) is a microdata infrastructure that combines individual-level information on residence, demographics, and economic characteristics with environmental amenities and hazards from 1999 through the present day. To better understand the long-run consequences and intergenerational effects of exposure to a changing environment, we expand the EIF by extending it backward to 1940. The Historical Environmental Impacts Frame (HEIF) combines the Census Bureau's historical administrative data, publicly available 1940 address information from the 1940 Decennial Census, and historical environmental data. This paper discusses the creation of the HEIF as well as the unique challenges that arise with using the Census Bureau's historical administrative data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expanding the Frontier of Economic Statistics Using Big Data: A Case Study of Regional Employment

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-37

    Big data offers potentially enormous benefits for improving economic measurement, but it also presents challenges (e.g., lack of representativeness and instability), implying that their value is not always clear. We propose a framework for quantifying the usefulness of these data sources for specific applications, relative to existing official sources. We specifically weigh the potential benefits of additional granularity and timeliness, while examining the accuracy associated with any new or improved estimates, relative to comparable accuracy produced in existing official statistics. We apply the methodology to employment estimates using data from a payroll processor, considering both the improvement of existing state-level estimates, but also the production of new, more timely, county-level estimates. We find that incorporating payroll data can improve existing state-level estimates by 11% based on out-of-sample mean absolute error, although the improvement is considerably higher for smaller state-industry cells. We also produce new county-level estimates that could provide more timely granular estimates than previously available. We develop a novel test to determine if these new county-level estimates have errors consistent with official series. Given the level of granularity, we cannot reject the hypothesis that the new county estimates have an accuracy in line with official measures, implying an expansion of the existing frontier. We demonstrate the practical importance of these experimental estimates by investigating a hypothetical application during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period in which more timely and granular information could have assisted in implementing effective policies. Relative to existing estimates, we find that the alternative payroll data series could help identify areas of the country where employment was lagging. Moreover, we also demonstrate the value of a more timely series.
    View Full Paper PDF