CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'population'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 77

Current Population Survey - 54

Internal Revenue Service - 48

Protected Identification Key - 47

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 43

Social Security Administration - 42

2010 Census - 38

Social Security Number - 35

Decennial Census - 32

Social Security - 29

Person Validation System - 27

National Science Foundation - 27

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 24

Center for Economic Studies - 23

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 22

Master Address File - 20

Housing and Urban Development - 18

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 18

Person Identification Validation System - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

Personally Identifiable Information - 17

Cornell University - 17

1940 Census - 16

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Employer Identification Numbers - 16

Research Data Center - 16

W-2 - 15

Ordinary Least Squares - 15

Administrative Records - 14

Some Other Race - 14

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Business Register - 12

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 12

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 12

Census 2000 - 12

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 12

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 11

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 11

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 11

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 11

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Longitudinal Business Database - 11

North American Industry Classification System - 11

Census Numident - 10

Federal Reserve Bank - 10

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 10

Medicaid Services - 9

Census Household Composition Key - 9

American Housing Survey - 9

National Center for Health Statistics - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

Special Sworn Status - 9

Standard Industrial Classification - 9

Census Bureau Business Register - 8

Economic Census - 8

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 8

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 8

Earned Income Tax Credit - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Adjusted Gross Income - 7

SSA Numident - 7

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Census Bureau Master Address File - 6

Indian Housing Information Center - 6

PIKed - 6

Harvard University - 6

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 6

Retail Trade - 6

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 6

Public Use Micro Sample - 6

LEHD Program - 6

NUMIDENT - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

MAF-ARF - 5

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 5

Census Edited File - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

Supreme Court - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

University of Chicago - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Postal Service - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

National Institutes of Health - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

PSID - 5

MAFID - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Data Management System - 4

Master Beneficiary Record - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 4

COVID-19 - 4

General Education Development - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Securities and Exchange Commission - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

Unemployment Insurance - 4

Census of Manufactures - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

ASEC - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Stanford University - 3

Technical Services - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

National Health Interview Survey - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Public Administration - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

University of Michigan - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

University of Maryland - 3

survey - 49

respondent - 46

ethnicity - 46

resident - 44

census bureau - 41

hispanic - 41

census data - 35

ethnic - 35

immigrant - 34

racial - 30

migrant - 29

race - 28

neighborhood - 27

poverty - 26

minority - 26

immigration - 26

data census - 25

migration - 24

housing - 24

residence - 23

statistical - 23

metropolitan - 23

data - 22

disadvantaged - 22

disparity - 21

citizen - 20

native - 20

medicaid - 16

residential - 16

segregation - 16

census research - 16

census survey - 15

socioeconomic - 15

use census - 15

recession - 15

white - 15

agency - 14

migrate - 14

migrating - 14

mexican - 14

census responses - 14

estimating - 14

enrollment - 13

black - 13

report - 12

record - 12

research census - 12

earnings - 12

rural - 12

geographic - 11

family - 11

reside - 11

percentile - 11

economic census - 11

coverage - 10

microdata - 10

segregated - 10

economist - 10

urban - 10

ancestry - 10

prevalence - 9

population survey - 9

expenditure - 9

latino - 9

imputation - 9

race census - 9

trend - 9

census records - 9

2010 census - 9

assimilation - 9

sampling - 8

household surveys - 8

datasets - 8

assessed - 8

1040 - 8

federal - 8

moving - 8

community - 8

indian - 8

residing - 8

state - 8

geography - 8

earner - 8

suburb - 8

employed - 8

immigrant population - 8

census use - 8

geographically - 7

irs - 7

income households - 7

environmental - 7

bias - 7

survey income - 7

records census - 7

interracial - 7

social - 7

census 2020 - 7

workforce - 7

econometric - 7

city - 7

home - 7

insurance - 7

employ - 7

research - 7

enrolled - 6

aging - 6

disclosure - 6

pollution - 6

linked census - 6

impact - 6

census years - 6

intergenerational - 6

census linked - 6

census household - 6

mobility - 6

heterogeneity - 6

welfare - 6

asian - 6

labor - 6

immigrated - 6

yearly - 6

establishment - 6

study - 6

ssa - 5

survey households - 5

demography - 5

income individuals - 5

tax - 5

income data - 5

concentration - 5

pollution exposure - 5

amenity - 5

pandemic - 5

surveys censuses - 5

poorer - 5

citizenship - 5

matching - 5

unemployed - 5

sector - 5

estimation - 5

censuses surveys - 5

rent - 5

relocate - 5

health - 5

statistician - 5

proprietorship - 5

healthcare - 5

researcher - 5

entrepreneurship - 5

endogeneity - 5

medicare - 5

neighbor - 5

refugee - 5

enrollee - 5

average - 5

longitudinal - 5

agriculture - 4

eligibility - 4

eligible - 4

parent - 4

household income - 4

emission - 4

epa - 4

exposure - 4

adoption - 4

hurricane - 4

sociology - 4

discrimination - 4

residential segregation - 4

gdp - 4

privacy - 4

public - 4

analysis - 4

locality - 4

pollutant - 4

midwest - 4

incorporated - 4

policymakers - 4

homeowner - 4

generation - 4

urbanization - 4

demand - 4

employee - 4

capital - 4

firms census - 4

revenue - 4

survey data - 4

area - 4

assessing - 4

salary - 4

mortality - 3

cohort - 3

information - 3

dependent - 3

taxpayer - 3

income children - 3

economically - 3

income survey - 3

parental - 3

child - 3

discrepancy - 3

income distributions - 3

mother - 3

information census - 3

estimator - 3

birth - 3

entrepreneur - 3

town - 3

quarterly - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

educated - 3

enterprise - 3

growth - 3

uninsured - 3

schooling - 3

fertility - 3

tribe - 3

ethnically - 3

disability - 3

poor - 3

renter - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

department - 3

census file - 3

worker - 3

payroll - 3

census business - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 137


  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Geographic Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Mortality in the US: Comparing Impacts of Place of Birth and Place of Residence

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-11

    Objective: Building on the hypothesis that early-life exposures might influence the onset of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD), this study delves into geographic variations in ADRD mortality in the US. By considering both state of residence and state of birth, we aim to discern the comparative significance of these geospatial factors. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS), that has 3.5 million records from 1973-2011 and over 0.5 million deaths. We focused on individuals born in or before 1930, tracked in NLMS cohorts from 1979-2000. Employing multi-level logistic regression, with individuals nested within states of residence and/or states of birth, we assessed the role of geographical factors in ADRD mortality variation. Results: We found that both state of birth and state of residence account for a modest portion of ADRD mortality variation. Specifically, state of residence explains 1.19% of the total variation in ADRD mortality, whereas state of birth explains only 0.6%. When combined, both state of residence and state of birth account for only 1.05% of the variation, suggesting state of residence could matter more in ADRD mortality outcomes. Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that state of residence explains more variation in ADRD mortality than state of birth. These results indicate that factors in later life may present more impactful intervention points for curbing ADRD mortality. While early-life environmental exposures remain relevant, their role as primary determinants of ADRD in later life appears to be less pronounced in this study.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Potential Bias When Using Administrative Data to Measure the Family Income of School-Aged Children

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-03

    Researchers and practitioners increasingly rely on administrative data sources to measure family income. However, administrative data sources are often incomplete in their coverage of the population, giving rise to potential bias in family income measures, particularly if coverage deficiencies are not well understood. We focus on the school-aged child population, due to its particular import to research and policy, and because of the unique challenges of linking children to family income information. We find that two of the most significant administrative sources of family income information that permit linking of children and parents'IRS Form 1040 and SNAP participation records'usefully complement each other, potentially reducing coverage bias when used together. In a case study considering how best to measure economic disadvantage rates in the public school student population, we demonstrate the sensitivity of family income statistics to assumptions about individuals who do not appear in administrative data sources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Fighting Fire with Fire(fighting Foam): The Long Run Effects of PFAS Use at U.S. Military Installations

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-72

    Tens of millions of people in the U.S. may be exposed to drinking water contaminated with perand poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals (PFAS). We provide the first estimates of long-run economic costs from a major, early PFAS source: fire-fighting foam. We combine the timing of its adoption with variation in the presence of fire training areas at U.S. military installations in the 1970s to estimate exposure effects for millions of individuals using natality records and restricted administrative data. We document diminished birthweights, college attendance, and earnings, illustrating a pollution externality from military training and unregulated chemicals as a determinant of economic opportunity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Census Historical Environmental Impacts Frame

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-66

    The Census Bureau's Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) is a microdata infrastructure that combines individual-level information on residence, demographics, and economic characteristics with environmental amenities and hazards from 1999 through the present day. To better understand the long-run consequences and intergenerational effects of exposure to a changing environment, we expand the EIF by extending it backward to 1940. The Historical Environmental Impacts Frame (HEIF) combines the Census Bureau's historical administrative data, publicly available 1940 address information from the 1940 Decennial Census, and historical environmental data. This paper discusses the creation of the HEIF as well as the unique challenges that arise with using the Census Bureau's historical administrative data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparison of Child Reporting in the American Community Survey and Federal Income Tax Returns Based on California Birth Records

    September 2024

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-55

    This paper takes advantage of administrative records from California, a state with a large child population and a significant historical undercount of children in Census Bureau data, dependent information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1040 records, and the American Community Survey to characterize undercounted children and compare child reporting. While IRS Form 1040 records offer potential utility for adjusting child undercounting in Census Bureau surveys, this analysis finds overlapping reporting issues among various demographic and economic groups. Specifically, older children, those of Non-Hispanic Black mothers and Hispanic mothers, children or parents with lower English proficiency, children whose mothers did not complete high school, and families with lower income-to-poverty ratio were less frequently reported in IRS 1040 records than other groups. Therefore, using IRS 1040 dependent records may have limitations for accurately representing populations with characteristics associated with the undercount of children in surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Internal Migration in the U.S. During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-50

    Survey and administrative internal migration data disagree on whether the COVID-19 pandemic increased or decreased mobility in the U.S. Moreover, though scholars have theorized and documented migration in response to environmental hazards and economic shocks, the novel conditions posed by a global pandemic make it difficult to hypothesize whether and how American migration might change as a result. We link individual-level data from the United States Postal Service's National Change of Address (NCOA) registry to American Community Survey (ACS) and Current Population Survey (CPS-ASEC) responses and other administrative records to document changes in the level, geography, and composition of migrant flows between 2019 and 2021. We find a 2% increase in address changes between 2019 and 2020, representing an additional 603,000 moves, driven primarily by young adults, earners at the extremes of the income distribution, and individuals (as opposed to families) moving over longer distances. Though the number of address changes returned to pre-pandemic levels in 2021, the pandemic-era geographic and compositional shifts in favor of longer distance moves away from the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic regions toward the South and in favor of younger, individual movers persisted. We also show that at least part of the disconnect between survey, media, and administrative/third-party migration data sources stems from the apparent misreporting of address changes on Census Bureau surveys. Among ACS and CPS-ASEC householders linked to NCOA data and filing a permanent change of address in their 1-year survey response reference period, only around 68% of ACS and 49% of CPS-ASEC householders also reported living in a different residence one year ago in their survey response.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Changing Opportunity: Sociological Mechanisms Underlying Growing Class Gaps and Shrinking Race Gaps in Economic Mobility

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-38

    We show that intergenerational mobility changed rapidly by race and class in recent decades and use these trends to study the causal mechanisms underlying changes in economic mobility. For white children in the U.S. born between 1978 and 1992, earnings increased for children from high-income families but decreased for children from low-income families, increasing earnings gaps by parental income ('class') by 30%. Earnings increased for Black children at all parental income levels, reducing white- Black earnings gaps for children from low-income families by 30%. Class gaps grew and race gaps shrank similarly for non-monetary outcomes such as educational attainment, standardized test scores, and mortality rates. Using a quasi-experimental design, we show that the divergent trends in economic mobility were caused by differential changes in childhood environments, as proxied by parental employment rates, within local communities defined by race, class, and childhood county. Outcomes improve across birth cohorts for children who grow up in communities with increasing parental employment rates, with larger effects for children who move to such communities at younger ages. Children's outcomes are most strongly related to the parental employment rates of peers they are more likely to interact with, such as those in their own birth cohort, suggesting that the relationship between children's outcomes and parental employment rates is mediated by social interaction. Our findings imply that community-level changes in one generation can propagate to the next generation and thereby generate rapid changes in economic mobility.
    View Full Paper PDF