CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Protected Identification Key'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 107

Internal Revenue Service - 97

Social Security Number - 87

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 81

Social Security Administration - 76

Current Population Survey - 72

Person Validation System - 66

Social Security - 60

Decennial Census - 52

Disclosure Review Board - 52

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 49

2010 Census - 43

Person Identification Validation System - 41

Employer Identification Numbers - 40

W-2 - 37

North American Industry Classification System - 32

Census Numident - 32

Ordinary Least Squares - 31

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 31

Personally Identifiable Information - 31

Master Address File - 30

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 29

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 27

National Science Foundation - 26

Business Register - 26

Center for Economic Studies - 24

Housing and Urban Development - 22

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 21

Adjusted Gross Income - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 20

SSA Numident - 20

Longitudinal Business Database - 19

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 19

Office of Management and Budget - 19

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 19

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 19

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 19

Earned Income Tax Credit - 18

Indian Health Service - 18

Census Household Composition Key - 16

Unemployment Insurance - 16

Service Annual Survey - 16

Administrative Records - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 14

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 14

Medicaid Services - 14

Some Other Race - 14

Social and Economic Supplement - 13

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 13

Employment History File - 13

Employer Characteristics File - 13

1940 Census - 13

Data Management System - 13

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

PSID - 12

National Bureau of Economic Research - 12

University of Chicago - 12

Indian Housing Information Center - 12

PIKed - 12

Census 2000 - 12

ASEC - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

Cornell University - 11

Composite Person Record - 11

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 10

Federal Reserve Bank - 10

Centers for Medicare - 10

MAFID - 10

Standard Industrial Classification - 10

Census Bureau Master Address File - 10

MAF-ARF - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

Research Data Center - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

COVID-19 - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research - 9

Disability Insurance - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

Office of Personnel Management - 9

NUMIDENT - 9

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 9

Postal Service - 9

Department of Labor - 8

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Census Edited File - 8

Department of Health and Human Services - 8

General Accounting Office - 7

Department of Education - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 7

CATI - 7

CDF - 7

Harvard University - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

Local Employment Dynamics - 7

LEHD Program - 7

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

University of Michigan - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Economic Census - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

National Institute on Aging - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Patent and Trademark Office - 6

Department of Defense - 6

HHS - 6

Federal Tax Information - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

American Economic Association - 6

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

Russell Sage Foundation - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

New York University - 5

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

University of Maryland - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Business Master File - 5

Business Employment Dynamics - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

Educational Services - 4

Health Care and Social Assistance - 4

Stanford University - 4

Federal Poverty Level - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Technical Services - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Department of Justice - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Probability Density Function - 4

MIT Press - 4

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Federal Register - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

Nonemployer Statistics - 3

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 3

New York Times - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

General Education Development - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Department of Economics - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Yale University - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

2SLS - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

survey - 49

population - 48

employed - 40

ethnicity - 38

respondent - 37

hispanic - 36

census data - 33

workforce - 30

employ - 29

census bureau - 28

poverty - 28

disadvantaged - 27

recession - 27

immigrant - 27

minority - 26

socioeconomic - 26

labor - 25

irs - 25

earnings - 24

disparity - 24

ethnic - 24

racial - 23

race - 23

payroll - 23

data - 22

employee - 22

enrollment - 22

record - 22

family - 20

resident - 20

estimating - 19

intergenerational - 19

1040 - 19

data census - 19

tax - 18

citizen - 17

segregation - 16

taxpayer - 16

welfare - 16

residence - 16

earner - 15

medicaid - 15

immigration - 15

agency - 15

economist - 15

housing - 14

datasets - 14

residential - 14

heterogeneity - 14

census responses - 14

matching - 14

worker - 13

unemployed - 13

black - 13

filing - 12

records census - 12

job - 12

census employment - 12

white - 12

salary - 11

ssa - 11

survey income - 11

parent - 11

assessed - 11

migrant - 11

imputation - 11

discrimination - 11

census use - 11

child - 10

census survey - 10

migration - 10

federal - 10

use census - 10

native - 10

state - 10

employer household - 10

occupation - 10

statistical - 9

sampling - 9

2010 census - 9

hiring - 9

enrolled - 9

dependent - 9

income data - 9

income households - 9

neighborhood - 9

mexican - 9

race census - 9

census records - 9

econometric - 9

parental - 8

longitudinal - 8

employment data - 8

employment statistics - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

percentile - 8

eligibility - 8

eligible - 8

microdata - 8

entrepreneur - 8

census household - 8

employing - 8

generation - 8

employee data - 8

ancestry - 8

census research - 8

census file - 8

work census - 7

workplace - 7

education - 7

revenue - 7

expenditure - 7

impact - 7

bias - 7

income survey - 7

latino - 7

citizenship - 7

identifier - 7

linkage - 7

database - 7

schooling - 7

graduate - 7

department - 7

associate - 7

clerical - 7

matched - 7

population survey - 6

student - 6

employment estimates - 6

income children - 6

household surveys - 6

survey households - 6

proprietorship - 6

coverage - 6

migrate - 6

migrating - 6

poorer - 6

report - 6

linked census - 6

environmental - 6

census linked - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

pollution - 6

pollutant - 6

wealth - 6

surveys censuses - 6

research census - 6

tenure - 6

mobility - 6

retirement - 6

medicare - 6

segregated - 6

residing - 6

poor - 6

birth - 6

educated - 6

mortality - 6

metropolitan - 6

loan - 5

mortgage - 5

earn - 5

worker demographics - 5

school - 5

enterprise - 5

funding - 5

household income - 5

immigrated - 5

incentive - 5

saving - 5

venture - 5

emission - 5

adoption - 5

relocation - 5

interracial - 5

discrepancy - 5

reside - 5

endogenous - 5

maternal - 5

census 2020 - 5

unobserved - 5

pollution exposure - 5

adulthood - 5

labor statistics - 5

censuses surveys - 5

survey data - 4

finance - 4

debt - 4

creditor - 4

effects employment - 4

rent - 4

renter - 4

prevalence - 4

trend - 4

employment dynamics - 4

economically - 4

quarterly - 4

disclosure - 4

family income - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

exemption - 4

financial - 4

home - 4

asian - 4

indian - 4

recessionary - 4

endogeneity - 4

assessing - 4

researcher - 4

innovation - 4

patent - 4

patenting - 4

bankruptcy - 4

exposure - 4

fertility - 4

invention - 4

proprietor - 4

assimilation - 4

rural - 4

wage data - 4

enrollee - 4

estimation - 3

estimator - 3

sample - 3

borrower - 3

lending - 3

lender - 3

credit - 3

employment earnings - 3

crime - 3

establishment - 3

employment trends - 3

subsidy - 3

sector - 3

incorporated - 3

income individuals - 3

pandemic - 3

parents income - 3

aging - 3

gdp - 3

macroeconomic - 3

woman - 3

mother - 3

recession exposure - 3

pregnancy - 3

concentration - 3

employment count - 3

workforce indicators - 3

inventory - 3

insurance - 3

employment measures - 3

industrial - 3

unemployment rates - 3

country - 3

corporation - 3

demography - 3

model - 3

estimates employment - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 160


  • Working Paper

    Earnings Measurement Error, Nonresponse and Administrative Mismatch in the CPS

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-48

    Using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement matched to Social Security Administration Detailed Earnings Records, we link observations across consecutive years to investigate a relationship between item nonresponse and measurement error in the earnings questions. Linking individuals across consecutive years allows us to observe switching from response to nonresponse and vice versa. We estimate OLS, IV, and finite mixture models that allow for various assumptions separately for men and women. We find that those who respond in both years of the survey exhibit less measurement error than those who respond in one year. Our findings suggest a trade-off between survey response and data quality that should be considered by survey designers, data collectors, and data users.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Credit Access in the United States

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-45

    We construct new population-level linked administrative data to study households' access to credit in the United States. These data reveal large differences in credit access by race, class, and hometown. By age 25, Black individuals, those who grew up in low-income families, and those who grew up in certain areas (including the Southeast and Appalachia) have significantly lower credit scores than other groups. Consistent with lower scores generating credit constraints, these individuals have smaller balances, more credit inquiries, higher credit card utilization rates, and greater use of alternative higher-cost forms of credit. Tests for alternative definitions of algorithmic bias in credit scores yield results in opposite directions. From a calibration perspective, group-level differences in credit scores understate differences in delinquency: conditional on a given credit score, Black individuals and those from low-income families fall delinquent at relatively higher rates. From a balance perspective, these groups receive lower credit scores even when comparing those with the same future repayment behavior. Addressing both of these biases and expanding credit access to groups with lower credit scores requires addressing group-level differences in delinquency rates. These delinquencies emerge soon after individuals access credit in their early twenties, often due to missed payments on credit cards, student loans, and other bills. Comprehensive measures of individuals' income profiles, income volatility, and observed wealth explain only a small portion of these repayment gaps. In contrast, we find that the large variation in repayment across hometowns mostly reflects the causal effect of childhood exposure to these places. Places that promote upward income mobility also promote repayment and expand credit access even conditional on income, suggesting that common place-level factors may drive behaviors in both credit and labor markets. We discuss suggestive evidence for several mechanisms that drive our results, including the role of social and cultural capital. We conclude that gaps in credit access by race, class, and hometown have roots in childhood environments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Understanding Criminal Record Penalties in the Labor Market

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-39

    This paper studies the earnings and employment penalties associated with a criminal record. Using a large-scale dataset linking criminal justice and employer-employee wage records, we estimate two-way fixed effects models that decompose earnings into worker's portable earnings potential and firm pay premia, both of which are allowed to shift after a worker acquires a record. We find that firm pay premia explain a small share of earnings gaps between workers with and without a record. There is little evidence of variable within-firm premia gaps either. Instead, components of workers' earnings potential that persist across firms explain the bulk of gaps. Conditional on earnings potential, workers with a record are also substantially less likely to be employed. Difference-in-differences estimates comparing workers' first conviction to workers charged but not convicted or charged later support these findings. The results suggest that criminal record penalties operate primarily by changing whether workers are employed and their earnings potential at every firm rather than increasing sorting into lower-paying jobs, although the bulk of gaps can be attributed to differences that existed prior to acquiring a record.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Consequences of Eviction for Parenting and Non-parenting College Students

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-35

    Amidst rising and increasingly unaffordable rents, 7.6 million people are threatened with eviction each year across the United States'and eviction rates are twice as high for renters with children. One important and neglected population who may experience unique levels of housing insecurity is college students, especially given that one in five college students are parents. In this study, we link 11.9 million student records to eviction filings from housing courts, demographic characteristics reported in decennial census and survey data, incomes reported on tax returns by students and their parents, and dates of birth and death from the Social Security Administration. Parenting students are more likely than non-parenting students to identify as female (62.81% vs. 55.94%) and Black (19.66% vs. 14.30%), be over 30 years old (42.73% vs. 20.25%), and have parents with lower household incomes ($100,000 vs. $140,000). Parenting students threatened with eviction (i.e., had an eviction filed against them) are much more likely than non-threatened parenting students to identify as female (81.18% vs. 62.81%) and Black (56.84% vs. 19.66%). In models adjusted for individual and institutional characteristics, we find that being threatened with an eviction was significantly associated with reduced likelihood of degree completion, reduced post-enrollment income, reduced likelihood of being married post-enrollment, and increased post-enrollment mortality. Among parenting students, 38.38% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.50-44.26%) of non-threatened students completed a bachelor's degree compared to just 15.36% (CI: 11.61-19.11%) of students threatened with eviction. Our findings highlight the long-term economic and health impacts of housing insecurity during college, especially for parenting students. Housing stability for parenting students may have substantial multigenerational benefits for economic mobility and population health.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Composition of Firm Workforces from 2006'2022: Findings from the Business Dynamics Statistics of Human Capital Experimental Product

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-20

    We introduce the Business Dynamics Statistics of Human Capital (BDS-HC) tables, a new Census Bureau experimental product that provides public-use statistics on the workforce composition of firms and its relationship to business dynamics. We use administrative W-2 filings to combine population-level worker demographic data with longitudinal business data to estimate the demographic and educational composition of nearly all non-farm employer businesses in the United States between 2006 and 2022. We use this newly constructed data to document the evolution of employment, entry, and exit of employers based on their workforce compositions. We also provide new statistics on the interaction between firm and worker characteristics, including the composition of workers at startup firms. We find substantial changes between 2006 and 2022 in the distribution of employers along several dimensions, primarily driven by changing workforce compositions within continuing firms rather than the reallocation of employment between firms. We also highlight systematic differences in the business dynamics of firms by their workforce compositions, suggesting that different groups of workers face different economic environments due to their employers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Peer Income Exposure Across the Income Distribution

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-16

    Children from families across the income distribution attend public schools, making schools and classrooms potential sites for interaction between more- and less-affluent children. However, limited information exists regarding the extent of economic integration in these contexts. We merge educational administrative data from Oregon with measures of family income derived from IRS records to document student exposure to economically diverse school and classroom peers. Our findings indicate that affluent children in public schools are relatively isolated from their less affluent peers, while low- and middle-income students experience relatively even peer income distributions. Students from families in the top percentile of the income distribution attend schools where 20 percent of their peers, on average, come from the top five income percentiles. A large majority of the differences in peer exposure that we observe arise from the sorting of students across schools; sorting across classrooms within schools plays a substantially smaller role.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Business Dynamics of Firms that Received Pandemic Relief Funding: Findings from a New Experimental BDS Data Product

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-05

    This paper describes a new experimental data product from the U.S. Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies: the Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) of firms that received Small Business Administration (SBA) pandemic funding. This new product, BDS-SBA COVID, expands the set of currently published BDS tables by linking loan-level program participation data from SBA to internal business microdata at the U.S. Census Bureau. The linked programs include the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), COVID Economic Injury Disaster Loans (COVID-EIDL), the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF), and Shuttered Venue Operators Grants (SVOG). Using these linked data, we tabulate annual firm and establishment counts, measures of job creation and destruction, and establishment entry and exit for recipients and non-recipients of program funds in 2020-2021. We further stratify the tables by timing of loan receipt and loan size, and business characteristics including geography, industry sector, firm size, and firm age. We find that for the youngest firms that received PPP, the timing of receipt mattered. Receiving an early loan correlated with a lower job destruction rate compared to non-recipients and businesses that received a later loan. For the smallest firms, simply participating in PPP was associated with lower employment loss. The timing of PPP receipt was also related to establishment exit rates. For businesses of nearly all ages, those that received an early loan exited at a lower rate in 2022 than later loan recipients.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Potential Bias When Using Administrative Data to Measure the Family Income of School-Aged Children

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-03

    Researchers and practitioners increasingly rely on administrative data sources to measure family income. However, administrative data sources are often incomplete in their coverage of the population, giving rise to potential bias in family income measures, particularly if coverage deficiencies are not well understood. We focus on the school-aged child population, due to its particular import to research and policy, and because of the unique challenges of linking children to family income information. We find that two of the most significant administrative sources of family income information that permit linking of children and parents'IRS Form 1040 and SNAP participation records'usefully complement each other, potentially reducing coverage bias when used together. In a case study considering how best to measure economic disadvantage rates in the public school student population, we demonstrate the sensitivity of family income statistics to assumptions about individuals who do not appear in administrative data sources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Places versus People: The Ins and Outs of Labor Market Adjustment to Globalization

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-78

    We analyze the distinct adjustment paths of U.S. labor markets (places) and U.S. workers (people) to increased Chinese import competition during the 2000s. Using comprehensive register data for 2000'2019, we document that employment levels more than fully rebound in trade-exposed places after 2010, while employment-to-population ratios remain depressed and manufacturing employment further atrophies. The adjustment of places to trade shocks is generational: affected areas recover primarily by adding workers to non-manufacturing who were below working age when the shock occurred. Entrants are disproportionately native-born Hispanics, foreign-born immigrants, women, and the college-educated, who find employment in relatively low-wage service sectors like medical services, education, retail, and hospitality. Using the panel structure of the employer-employee data, we decompose changes in the employment composition of places into trade-induced shifts in the gross flows of people across sectors, locations, and non-employment status. Contrary to standard models, trade shocks reduce geographic mobility, with both in- and out-migration remaining depressed through 2019. The employment recovery instead stems almost entirely from young adults and foreign-born immigrants taking their first U.S. jobs in affected areas, with minimal contributions from cross-sector transitions of former manufacturing workers. Although worker inflows into non-manufacturing more than fully offset manufacturing employment losses in trade-exposed locations after 2010, incumbent workers neither fully recover earnings losses nor predominately exit the labor market, but rather age in place as communities undergo rapid demographic and industrial transitions.
    View Full Paper PDF