CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Protected Identification Key'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 121

Internal Revenue Service - 108

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 99

Social Security Number - 97

Social Security Administration - 87

Current Population Survey - 81

Person Validation System - 75

Social Security - 69

Decennial Census - 58

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 56

Disclosure Review Board - 54

2010 Census - 49

Person Identification Validation System - 48

Employer Identification Numbers - 44

W-2 - 42

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 36

Census Numident - 36

North American Industry Classification System - 36

Personally Identifiable Information - 35

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 34

Ordinary Least Squares - 34

Master Address File - 33

Center for Economic Studies - 31

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 29

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 28

Business Register - 28

National Science Foundation - 26

Adjusted Gross Income - 24

Housing and Urban Development - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 22

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 22

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 22

Longitudinal Business Database - 22

SSA Numident - 21

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 21

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 20

Indian Health Service - 19

Earned Income Tax Credit - 19

Unemployment Insurance - 19

Social and Economic Supplement - 18

Service Annual Survey - 18

Census Household Composition Key - 17

Administrative Records - 16

Medicaid Services - 16

Some Other Race - 16

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 16

1940 Census - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

National Bureau of Economic Research - 14

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 14

Data Management System - 14

PSID - 14

Employment History File - 14

ASEC - 13

Individual Characteristics File - 13

PIKed - 13

National Center for Health Statistics - 13

Cornell University - 13

Employer Characteristics File - 13

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

COVID-19 - 12

MAFID - 12

University of Chicago - 12

Indian Housing Information Center - 12

Census 2000 - 12

CPS ASEC - 11

Department of Health and Human Services - 11

NUMIDENT - 11

Centers for Medicare - 11

MAF-ARF - 11

Federal Reserve Bank - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 11

Standard Industrial Classification - 11

Composite Person Record - 11

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 11

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 10

Disability Insurance - 10

Department of Education - 10

Office of Personnel Management - 10

Census Bureau Master Address File - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

Research Data Center - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

DOB - 10

Population Estimates Program - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

Census Edited File - 9

Selective Service System - 9

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 9

Postal Service - 9

Department of Agriculture - 8

Harvard University - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Department of Homeland Security - 8

Business Dynamics Statistics - 8

Department of Labor - 8

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Food and Nutrition Service - 7

National Institutes of Health - 7

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 7

MTO - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Form W-2 - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 7

CATI - 7

CDF - 7

Cumulative Density Function - 7

American Economic Association - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

LEHD Program - 7

Economic Research Service - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Russell Sage Foundation - 6

National Academy of Sciences - 6

Opportunity Atlas - 6

Stanford University - 6

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

Legal Form of Organization - 6

University of Maryland - 6

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Economic Census - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

National Institute on Aging - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 6

Patent and Trademark Office - 6

Department of Defense - 6

HHS - 6

Federal Tax Information - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Supreme Court - 5

Health and Retirement Study - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

New York University - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Business Master File - 5

Business Employment Dynamics - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Federal Register - 4

2SLS - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

Nonemployer Statistics - 4

Yale University - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Ohio State University - 4

Educational Services - 4

Health Care and Social Assistance - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Technical Services - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Department of Justice - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Probability Density Function - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

MIT Press - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Department of State - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

COVID - 3

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 3

New York Times - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

General Education Development - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

LODES - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

John Voorheis - 16

Sonya R. Porter - 14

Maggie R. Jones - 13

James M. Noon - 10

Renuka Bhaskar - 9

Lars Vilhuber - 9

Thomas B. Foster - 8

Leah R. Clark - 8

J. David Brown - 8

Moises Yi - 7

Jonathan Eggleston - 7

Adela Luque - 7

Leticia Fernandez - 7

Charles Hokayem - 6

Kristin Sandusky - 6

Martha Stinson - 6

Danielle H. Sandler - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

John M. Abowd - 6

Kevin L. McKinney - 6

John Haltiwanger - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Kevin Rinz - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Sonya Rastogi - 6

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Mark J. Kutzbach - 5

Ethan Krohn - 4

Victoria Udalova - 4

Ariel J. Binder - 4

Andrew Penner - 4

Joshua Mitchell - 4

James P. Ziliak - 4

Thurston Domina - 4

Amanda Eng - 4

Kendall Houghton - 4

Carl Lieberman - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Sharon R. Ennis - 4

Ciyata Coleman - 3

Sanghun (Eric) Kim - 3

Krishnan Patel - 3

Dean Plueger - 3

Michaela Dillon - 3

Linden McBride - 3

David Card - 3

Ciprian Domnisoru - 3

Andrew Keller - 3

Liana Christin Landivar - 3

Raj Chetty - 3

Matthew Staiger - 3

Quentin Brummet - 3

Emily Penner - 3

Michelle Spiegel - 3

Paul Y. Yoo - 3

Christopher R. Bollinger - 3

Nathaniel Hendren - 3

Jonathan Colmer - 3

James R. Spletzer - 3

Katharine Abraham - 3

Adam Bee - 3

Garrett Anstreicher - 3

Sarah Miller - 3

Laura Wherry - 3

Nathan Goldschlag - 3

Joseph Staudt - 3

Nikolas Mittag - 3

Caroline Walker - 3

Kristin McCue - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Catherine G. Massey - 3

Deborah Wagner - 3

Carolyn A. Liebler - 3

Amy B. O'Hara - 3

Bryce Stephens - 3

Simon Woodcock - 3

population - 57

survey - 55

respondent - 45

ethnicity - 42

employed - 41

census bureau - 38

hispanic - 38

census data - 36

socioeconomic - 34

poverty - 34

disadvantaged - 31

workforce - 31

employ - 30

minority - 28

disparity - 28

irs - 27

earnings - 27

ethnic - 27

recession - 27

immigrant - 27

labor - 26

family - 25

racial - 25

race - 25

record - 24

payroll - 24

enrollment - 23

intergenerational - 23

employee - 23

data census - 22

resident - 22

data - 22

1040 - 21

welfare - 21

estimating - 21

tax - 19

housing - 19

segregation - 19

medicaid - 18

residential - 18

residence - 18

earner - 18

citizen - 18

taxpayer - 17

agency - 17

economist - 17

census responses - 16

statistical - 15

use census - 15

matching - 15

immigration - 15

neighborhood - 14

datasets - 14

heterogeneity - 14

federal - 13

filing - 13

eligibility - 13

census use - 13

records census - 13

white - 13

census employment - 13

worker - 13

unemployed - 13

black - 13

imputation - 12

assessed - 12

generation - 12

discrimination - 12

parent - 12

ssa - 12

job - 12

eligible - 11

child - 11

2010 census - 11

income data - 11

enrolled - 11

sampling - 11

census survey - 11

state - 11

salary - 11

survey income - 11

migrant - 11

census records - 10

percentile - 10

migration - 10

native - 10

employer household - 10

occupation - 10

education - 9

schooling - 9

mortality - 9

census research - 9

parental - 9

department - 9

graduate - 9

entrepreneur - 9

hiring - 9

dependent - 9

income households - 9

mexican - 9

race census - 9

econometric - 9

report - 8

educated - 8

coverage - 8

wealth - 8

mobility - 8

poorer - 8

bias - 8

linkage - 8

impact - 8

database - 8

identifier - 8

latino - 8

longitudinal - 8

employment data - 8

employment statistics - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

microdata - 8

census household - 8

employing - 8

employee data - 8

ancestry - 8

census file - 8

research census - 7

estimates census - 7

rent - 7

renter - 7

linked census - 7

segregated - 7

grandparent - 7

household surveys - 7

enterprise - 7

residing - 7

proprietorship - 7

entrepreneurship - 7

retirement - 7

work census - 7

workplace - 7

revenue - 7

expenditure - 7

income survey - 7

citizenship - 7

associate - 7

clerical - 7

matched - 7

prevalence - 6

provided census - 6

census estimates - 6

censuses surveys - 6

rural - 6

school - 6

home - 6

parents income - 6

adopt - 6

relocation - 6

proprietor - 6

postsecondary - 6

adulthood - 6

mortgage - 6

population survey - 6

student - 6

employment estimates - 6

income children - 6

survey households - 6

migrate - 6

migrating - 6

environmental - 6

census linked - 6

pollution - 6

pollutant - 6

surveys censuses - 6

tenure - 6

medicare - 6

poor - 6

birth - 6

metropolitan - 6

enrollee - 5

paper census - 5

macroeconomic - 5

economically - 5

income housing - 5

family income - 5

outcome - 5

researcher - 5

census disclosure - 5

disclosure - 5

incorporated - 5

degree - 5

nonemployer businesses - 5

asian - 5

indian - 5

propensity - 5

recessionary - 5

loan - 5

earn - 5

worker demographics - 5

funding - 5

household income - 5

immigrated - 5

incentive - 5

saving - 5

venture - 5

emission - 5

income white - 5

adoption - 5

interracial - 5

discrepancy - 5

reside - 5

endogenous - 5

maternal - 5

census 2020 - 5

unobserved - 5

pollution exposure - 5

labor statistics - 5

credit - 4

filed - 4

sample census - 4

www census - 4

woman - 4

educational - 4

estimation - 4

analysis - 4

estimates intergenerational - 4

corporation - 4

insurance - 4

sector - 4

country - 4

survey data - 4

finance - 4

debt - 4

creditor - 4

effects employment - 4

trend - 4

employment dynamics - 4

quarterly - 4

exemption - 4

financial - 4

endogeneity - 4

assessing - 4

innovation - 4

patent - 4

patenting - 4

bankruptcy - 4

exposure - 4

fertility - 4

invention - 4

estimates employment - 4

assimilation - 4

wage data - 4

available census - 3

suburb - 3

amenity - 3

neighbor - 3

study - 3

statistician - 3

individuals census - 3

disability - 3

information census - 3

company - 3

college - 3

university - 3

career - 3

entrepreneurial - 3

cohort - 3

homeowner - 3

estimator - 3

sample - 3

borrower - 3

lending - 3

lender - 3

employment earnings - 3

crime - 3

establishment - 3

employment trends - 3

subsidy - 3

income individuals - 3

taxable - 3

pandemic - 3

aging - 3

gdp - 3

mother - 3

recession exposure - 3

pregnancy - 3

concentration - 3

employment count - 3

workforce indicators - 3

inventory - 3

employment measures - 3

industrial - 3

unemployment rates - 3

demography - 3

model - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 181


  • Working Paper

    CTC and ACTC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2021

    August 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-49

    The Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) help ease the financial burden of families with children. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the CTC and ACTC covering tax year 2021. In this tax year the credit was temporarily expanded under the American Rescue Plan Act. The estimates derive from linking the 2022 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify CTC/ACTC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall, in tax year 2021, eligible taxpayers participated in the CTC and ACTC program at a rate of 91 percent while dollar participation was 85 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Access to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) at the State and Substate Levels: Meaning and Measurement

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-44

    This study estimates eligibility and access rates for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) administrative data linked with American Community Survey (ACS) data. This study is one result of a long-term research collaboration among USDA's Economic Research Service; the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; USDA's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS); and participating state WIC agencies.'By analyzing WIC participation at the state and substate levels, the report provides insights into program reach and demographic differences. The findings confirm that the Census Bureau estimates meet high statistical reliability standards, providing valuable data for program officials and managers, and other stakeholders, to enhance program outreach and effectiveness. A key focus of the report is the comparison between Census Bureau and USDA, FNS estimates, which differ in methodology and measurement scope.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Integrating Administrative and Survey Data to Estimate WIC Eligibility and Access

    July 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-43

    The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides benefits to low-income, nutritionally at-risk women, infants, and children. To administer WIC, officials and program managers at the federal and state level want to understand who is eligible for the program, who among the eligible population chooses to participate, and who is not accessing the program despite their eligibility. Novel individual-level data linkages between restricted-use WIC Administrative Records and the American Community Survey provide WIC access rates estimated at the state and county levels, as well as estimates disaggregated by the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and their households. These estimates are developed by the Census-FNS-ERS Joint Project, a research partnership among the U.S. Census Bureau, the US Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service and Economic Research Service, and state WIC agencies that provide the requisite WIC administrative data to the Census Bureau. This paper details and evaluates our current data linkage and estimation methods, reports results, and identifies areas for improvement and further research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Female Teachers on Female Students' Lifetime Well-Being

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-39

    We document an enduring influence of female primary school teachers on their female students in rural America circa 1940. Using historical US Census data linked to IRS records, later censuses, and death records, we find that exposure to female teachers significantly improved girls' educational attainment'particularly among those with poorly-educated parents and in areas with limited labor market opportunities for women. These educational gains translated into delayed marriage and childbearing, marriage matches to better-educated husbands and higher household income. We also find that exposure to female teachers increased longevity of women relative to men.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Experimental Capture/recapture Estimation Using Census and Administrative Data

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-38

    This report expands upon the innovation of utilizing administrative records and third-party data implemented in the 2020 Census. The 2020 Census used administrative records and third-party data in address canvassing and nonresponse followup operations. The Census Bureau also has a long history of using administrative records of births, deaths, and other information to produce Demographic Analysis coverage estimates. Since 1980, the Census Bureau has produced capture-recapture coverage estimates by conducting an independent post-enumeration survey and utilizing dual system estimation approaches. This report presents the research results of attempting to see if administrative records and third-party data could be utilized to produce capture-recapture coverage estimates. This work uses an Expectation Maximization Log Linear Modeling approach previously researched by Statistics Netherlands and Statistics New Zealand. This report documents some of the experimental results from an evaluation that was part of the 2020 Census Program for Evaluation, Experiments, and Assessments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employment and Earnings Trajectories of HUD Program Participants

    May 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-31

    Federal housing assistance programs, such as those run by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), have been shown to reduce rent burden and improve housing stability for program participants, which may in turn have downstream impacts on their labor market attachment and career trajectories. However, existing studies from individual cities or states provide mixed evidence on the association of housing assistance with labor market outcomes. By linking HUD administrative records to matched employee-employer earnings records from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) program, we document how the labor market trajectories of program participants change as they enter and exit federal housing assistance programs, examining outcomes over a 14-year window surrounding entry or exit. In our analysis of entry, we find that the employment rates and earnings of first-time HUD program participants begin to increase upon entering a HUD program, which represents a reversal of prior declining trends in these outcomes. Suggestive of a positive association, these increases in employment and earnings trends exceed those of low-income non-participants from the American Community Survey (ACS). In our analysis of exits, we find that program participants who eventually leave a HUD program have increasing pre-exit trends in employment and earnings that then flatten upon exiting. Comparing these negative changes in trend to the relatively stable trajectories of those who remain in HUD programs throughout the analysis suggests that exits are associated with diminished employment and earnings trajectories.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Lands of Opportunity: Differences in the Geography of Wealth and Income Mobility in the United States

    May 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-30

    We provide new county-level estimates of intergenerational mobility, covering multiple economic concepts: total income, labor income, homeownership, housing wealth, and total wealth. This is possible via small-area estimation techniques and linked survey and administrative data covering millions of U.S. children born between 1978 and 1986. We find that relative mobility in wealth concepts shows less spatial clustering and more spatial variation than relative mobility in income concepts. Many cities and their suburbs exhibit lower relative mobility (i.e. higher intergenerational persistence) in wealth concepts than in income concepts. Next, we show that various local characteristics are associated with some concepts of economic mobility but not with others. For example, we estimate a strong negative association between the local severity of the Great Recession and child income, regardless of parent position in the income distribution. However, the negative association between recession severity and wealth only exists among children from poorer families. We provide a public-use data package on census.gov to facilitate further research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    How Do Neighborhoods and Firms Affect Intergenerational Mobility?

    March 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-18

    We use data from the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics linked to the 2000 Census to study intergenerational earnings mobility in the United States. We augment the standard intergenerational transmission model relating children's log earnings to those of their parent with an additional term representing mean log parent earnings in the childhood neighborhood. The between-neighborhood intergenerational relationship is twice as strong as the within-neighborhood relationship, even after adjusting for measurement error in parents' earnings. Moreover, mean earnings of the parents in a neighborhood capture over 80% of the variation in unrestricted neighborhood effects that reflect differences in 'absolute mobility'. Next, we use an AKM framework to decompose parents', children's, and neighboring parents' earnings into person effects and establishment premiums. Children's person effects are mainly influenced by parents' and neighbors' person effects, whereas children's establishment premiums are mainly influenced by parents' and neighbors' establishment premiums. These patterns point to separate channels for human capital and access to jobs in the intergenerational transmission process. Finally, we explore the implications for the Black-white earnings gap. Neighborhoods explain 30% of the Black-white gap in children's earnings conditional on parents' earnings, operating largely through gaps in average person effects. Conditional on neighborhood average earnings, children from neighborhoods with higher Black shares achieve higher adult earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Mortality Risk of Raising Grandchildren in the United States

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-13

    In the United States, grandparents who live with and provide primary care to their grandchildren have emerged as a particularly vulnerable group since the 1990s. Using confidential data from the U.S. Census Bureau and Social Security Administration, this study linked individuals aged 50 years or older from the 2000 census long-form sample to their death records from 2000'2019 (weighted n = 64,027,000) and examined the longitudinal association between coresident grandparenting status and mortality for non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. We found consistently higher rates of mortality for White coresident grandparents and lower rates for Asian coresident grandparents, regardless of the duration of primary caregiving, compared to their peers without coresident grandchildren. We also found increased risks of mortality among Hispanic long-term primary caregivers but reduced risks among Black short-term primary caregivers, compared to their peers without coresident grandchildren.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Non-Random Assignment of Individual Identifiers and Selection into Linked Data: Implications for Research

    January 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-06

    The U.S. Census Bureau's Person Identification Validation System facilitates anonymous linkages between survey and administrative records by assigning Protected Identification Keys (PIKs) to person records. While PIK assignment is generally accurate, some person records are not successfully assigned a PIK, which can lead to sample selection bias in analyses of linked data. Using the American Community Survey (ACS) and the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) between 2005 and 2022, we corroborate and extend existing findings on the drivers of PIK assignment, showing that the rate of PIK assignment varies widely across socio-demographic subgroups. Using earnings as a test case, we then show that limiting a survey sample of wage earners to person records with PIKs or successful linkages to W-2 wage records tends to overestimate self-reported wage earnings, on average, indicative of linkage-induced selection bias. In a validation exercise, we demonstrate that reweighting methods, such as inverse probability weighting or entropy balancing, can mitigate this bias.
    View Full Paper PDF