CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 56

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 50

North American Industry Classification System - 44

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 36

Current Population Survey - 34

Center for Economic Studies - 32

Unemployment Insurance - 30

Employer Identification Numbers - 29

American Community Survey - 28

Longitudinal Business Database - 28

Local Employment Dynamics - 26

Internal Revenue Service - 26

Protected Identification Key - 21

Social Security Administration - 19

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 19

National Science Foundation - 19

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 18

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 18

Social Security Number - 17

Standard Industrial Classification - 17

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Decennial Census - 15

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 15

Employer Characteristics File - 14

Census Bureau Business Register - 14

Business Register - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 13

Social Security - 12

Master Address File - 12

County Business Patterns - 12

Cornell University - 12

Business Employment Dynamics - 12

Ordinary Least Squares - 12

Research Data Center - 12

Employment History File - 11

Office of Personnel Management - 11

2010 Census - 11

Business Dynamics Statistics - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 10

National Bureau of Economic Research - 10

Core Based Statistical Area - 10

Composite Person Record - 9

Employer-Household Dynamics - 8

Total Factor Productivity - 8

Occupational Employment Statistics - 8

Economic Census - 8

Federal Reserve Bank - 8

Service Annual Survey - 8

Successor Predecessor File - 8

University of Maryland - 8

Department of Economics - 7

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 7

Department of Labor - 7

LEHD Program - 7

CDF - 7

Cumulative Density Function - 7

University of Chicago - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Labor Turnover Survey - 7

Census of Manufactures - 6

American Economic Association - 6

International Trade Research Report - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Business Master File - 6

American Housing Survey - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

JOLTS - 6

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 5

Retail Trade - 5

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Census 2000 - 5

PSID - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Person Validation System - 4

MAF-ARF - 4

IQR - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

National Center for Health Statistics - 4

National Establishment Time Series - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Current Employment Statistics - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

University of Michigan - 4

AKM - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Journal of Labor Economics - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Office of Management and Budget - 4

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Department of Education - 3

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Stanford University - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

VAR - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Professional Services - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

W-2 - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

DOB - 3

TFPQ - 3

Technical Services - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

New York Times - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

workforce - 48

employ - 46

employed - 43

census employment - 35

employee - 35

labor - 31

payroll - 28

recession - 24

survey - 21

worker - 20

economist - 18

job - 18

earnings - 18

employment statistics - 16

quarterly - 16

census bureau - 15

employment dynamics - 14

statistical - 13

employment data - 13

hiring - 13

workplace - 13

agency - 12

respondent - 12

report - 12

employment growth - 12

labor statistics - 11

employee data - 11

data census - 10

occupation - 10

estimating - 10

hire - 10

metropolitan - 10

workforce indicators - 10

census data - 9

econometric - 9

longitudinal - 9

relocation - 8

work census - 8

employing - 8

employment estimates - 8

unemployed - 8

employment count - 8

salary - 8

macroeconomic - 7

layoff - 7

sector - 7

tenure - 7

growth - 7

microdata - 7

longitudinal employer - 7

data - 7

federal - 6

employment flows - 6

regress - 6

research census - 6

production - 6

imputation - 6

estimates employment - 6

employment wages - 6

employment earnings - 6

worker demographics - 6

employer household - 6

linked census - 6

residential - 6

residence - 6

turnover - 6

analysis - 5

statistician - 5

census survey - 5

shift - 5

earn - 5

disparity - 5

migration - 5

recessionary - 5

endogeneity - 5

heterogeneity - 5

manufacturing - 5

industrial - 5

record - 5

state - 5

establishment - 5

disclosure - 5

employment measures - 5

mobility - 5

resident - 5

population - 4

exogeneity - 4

socioeconomic - 4

unemployment rates - 4

relocate - 4

expenditure - 4

information census - 4

irs - 4

censuses surveys - 4

2010 census - 4

labor markets - 4

demand - 4

market - 4

gdp - 4

census research - 4

measures employment - 4

clerical - 4

discrimination - 4

employment trends - 4

trends employment - 4

efficiency - 3

employed census - 3

spillover - 3

welfare - 3

filing - 3

estimation - 3

aggregate - 3

incentive - 3

workers earnings - 3

city - 3

use census - 3

productive - 3

datasets - 3

company - 3

department - 3

census file - 3

privacy - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

migrate - 3

immigrant - 3

wage data - 3

unobserved - 3

trend - 3

housing - 3

neighborhood - 3

economic census - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 74


  • Working Paper

    Integrating Multiple U.S. Census Bureau Data Assets to Create Standardized Profiles of Program Participants

    January 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-01

    The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Evidence Act) directed federal agencies to systematically use data when making policy decisions. In response, the U.S. Census Bureau established the Evidence Group within its Center for Economic Studies (CES). With an interdisciplinary team of economists, sociologists, and statisticians, the Evidence Group can support the broader federal government in their efforts to use existing data to improve program operations without increasing respondent burden. For federal agencies administering social safety net and business assistance programs in particular, the team provides a no-cost evidence-building service that links program records to Census Bureau data assets and creates a series of standardized tables describing participants, their economic outcomes prior to program entry, and the communities where they live. These tables provide partner agencies with the detailed information they need to better understand their participants and potentially make their programs more accountable and effective in reaching their target populations. In this working paper, we describe the standardized tables themselves as well as the data assets available at the Census Bureau to create these tables, the data files produced by the table production process, and the methodology used to merge and harmonize data on participants and subsequently calculate unbiased and accurate estimates. We conclude with a brief discussion of steps taken to ensure confidentiality and data security. This documentation is intended to facilitate proper use and understanding of the standardized tables by partner agencies as well as researchers who are interested in leveraging these tools to explore characteristics of their samples of interest.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trapped or Transferred: Worker Mobility and Labor Market Power in the Energy Transition

    December 2025

    Authors: Minwoo Hyun

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-76

    Using matched employer-employee data covering 1.35 million US workers separated from the fossil fuel extraction industry between 1999 and 2019, I estimate how local fossil fuel labor demand shocks affect employment and earnings. Employment probabilities fall markedly after exposure, and earnings decline gradually over the first seven years with only partial recovery by ten years since exposure to the shocks. Workers who remain in the fossil fuel sector, disproportionately men in sector-specific roles, experience nearly twice the earnings losses of those who switch sectors, possibly due to limited occupational mobility. Among non-switchers, losses are larger in labor markets with high employer concentration, indicating that scarce outside options translate into lower reemployment wages and weaker bargaining positions. Geographic movers fare worse than stayers, reflecting negative selection (younger, lower-earning) and relocation to metropolitan areas where fossil fuel or low-skilled service sectors remain highly concentrated, leaving monopsony power intact.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Job Tasks, Worker Skills, and Productivity

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-63

    We present new empirical evidence suggesting that we can better understand productivity dispersion across businesses by accounting for differences in how tasks, skills, and occupations are organized. This aligns with growing attention to the task content of production. We link establishment-level data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey with productivity data from the Census Bureau's manufacturing surveys. Our analysis reveals strong relationships between establishment productivity and task, skill, and occupation inputs. These relationships are highly nonlinear and vary by industry. When we account for these patterns, we can explain a substantial share of productivity dispersion across establishments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Childcare Establishments

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-53

    Childcare is essential for working families, yet it remains increasingly unaffordable and inaccessible for parents and offers poverty-level wages to many employees. While research suggests minimum wage policies may improve the welfare of low-wage workers, there is also evidence they may increase firm exits, especially among smaller, low-profit firms, which could reduce access and harm consumer well-being. This study is the first to examine these trade-offs in the childcare industry, a labor-intensive, highly regulated sector where capital-labor substitution is limited, and to provide evidence on how minimum wage policies affect a dual-sector labor market in the U.S., where self-employed and waged providers serve overlapping markets. Using variation from state-level minimum wage increases between 1995 and 2019 and unique microdata, I implement a cross-state county border discontinuity design to estimate impacts on the stocks, flows, and composition of childcare establishments. I find that while county-level aggregate establishment stocks and employment remained stable, establishment-level turnover increased, and employment decreased. I reconcile these findings by showing that minimum wage increases prompted reallocation, with larger establishments in the waged-sector more likely to enter and less likely to exit, making this one of the first studies to link null aggregate effects to shifts in establishment composition. Finally, I show that minimum wage increases may negatively affect the self-employed sector, resulting in fewer owners with advanced degrees and more with only high school education. These findings suggest that minimum wage policies reshape who provides care in ways that could affect both quality and access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Childcare Costs on Mothers' Labor Force Participation

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-25

    The rising costs of childcare pose challenges for families, leading to difficult choices including those impacting mothers' labor force participation. This paper investigates the relationship between childcare costs and maternal employment. Using data from the National Database of Childcare Prices, the American Community Survey, and the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics, we estimate the impact of childcare costs on mothers' labor force participation through two empirical strategies. A fixed-effects approach controls for geographic and temporal heterogeneity in costs as well as mothers' idiosyncratic preferences for work and childcare, while an instrumental variables approach addresses the endogeneity of mothers' preferences for work and childcare by leveraging exogenous geographic and temporal variation in childcare licensing requirements. Our findings across both research designs indicate that higher childcare costs reduce labor force participation among mothers, with lower-income mothers exhibiting greater responsiveness to changes in childcare costs.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Oil News Shocks on Job Creation and Destruction

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-06

    Using data from the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) and the Census of Manufacturing (CMF), we construct quarterly measures of job creation and destruction by 3-digit NAICS industries spanning from 1980Q3-2016Q4. These long series allow us to address three questions regarding the effect of oil news shocks. What is the average effect of oil news shocks on sectoral labor reallocation? What characteristics explain the observed heterogeneity in the average responses across industries? Has the response of US manufacturing changed over time? We find evidence that oil news shocks exert only a moderate effect on total manufacturing net employment growth but lead to a significant increase in job reallocation. However, we find a high degree of heterogeneity in responses across industries. We then show that the cross-industry variation in the sensitivity of net employment growth and excess job reallocation to oil news shocks is related to differences in energy costs, the rate of energy to capital expenditures, and the share of mature firms in the industry. Finally, we illustrate how the dynamic response of sectoral job creation and destruction to oil news shocks has declined since the mid-2000s.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Revisions to the LEHD Establishment Imputation Procedure and Applications to Administrative Job Frame

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-51

    The Census Bureau is developing a 'job frame' to provide detailed job-level employment data across the U.S. through linked administrative records such as unemployment insurance and IRS W-2 filings. This working paper summarizes the research conducted by the job frame development team on modifying and extending the LEHD Unit-to-Worker (U2W) imputation procedure for the job frame prototype. It provides a conceptual overview of the U2W imputation method, highlighting key challenges and tradeoffs in its current application. The paper then presents four imputation methodologies and evaluates their performance in areas such as establishment assignment accuracy, establishment size matching, and job separation rates. The results show that all methodologies perform similarly in assigning workers to the correct establishment. Non-spell-based methodologies excel in matching establishment sizes, while spell-based methodologies perform better in accurately tracking separation rates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expanding the Frontier of Economic Statistics Using Big Data: A Case Study of Regional Employment

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-37

    Big data offers potentially enormous benefits for improving economic measurement, but it also presents challenges (e.g., lack of representativeness and instability), implying that their value is not always clear. We propose a framework for quantifying the usefulness of these data sources for specific applications, relative to existing official sources. We specifically weigh the potential benefits of additional granularity and timeliness, while examining the accuracy associated with any new or improved estimates, relative to comparable accuracy produced in existing official statistics. We apply the methodology to employment estimates using data from a payroll processor, considering both the improvement of existing state-level estimates, but also the production of new, more timely, county-level estimates. We find that incorporating payroll data can improve existing state-level estimates by 11% based on out-of-sample mean absolute error, although the improvement is considerably higher for smaller state-industry cells. We also produce new county-level estimates that could provide more timely granular estimates than previously available. We develop a novel test to determine if these new county-level estimates have errors consistent with official series. Given the level of granularity, we cannot reject the hypothesis that the new county estimates have an accuracy in line with official measures, implying an expansion of the existing frontier. We demonstrate the practical importance of these experimental estimates by investigating a hypothetical application during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period in which more timely and granular information could have assisted in implementing effective policies. Relative to existing estimates, we find that the alternative payroll data series could help identify areas of the country where employment was lagging. Moreover, we also demonstrate the value of a more timely series.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Payroll Tax Incidence: Evidence from Unemployment Insurance

    June 2024

    Authors: Audrey Guo

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-35

    Economic models assume that payroll tax burdens fall fully on workers, but where does tax incidence fall when taxes are firm-specific and time-varying? Unemployment insurance in the United States has the key feature of varying both across employers and over time, creating the potential for labor demand responses if tax costs cannot be fully passed through to worker wages. Using state policy changes and administrative data of matched employer-employee job spells, I study how employment and earnings respond to unexpected payroll tax increases for highly exposed employers. I find significant drops in employment growth driven by lower hiring, and minimal evidence of passthrough to earnings. The negative employment effects are strongest for young workers and single-establishment firms.
    View Full Paper PDF