CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'census bureau'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 41

Current Population Survey - 40

Internal Revenue Service - 34

Protected Identification Key - 30

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 28

Social Security Administration - 27

National Science Foundation - 26

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 25

Cornell University - 24

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 24

Social Security Number - 23

Center for Economic Studies - 22

Person Validation System - 20

Decennial Census - 19

Employer Identification Numbers - 19

2010 Census - 18

North American Industry Classification System - 17

Business Register - 17

Economic Census - 16

Social Security - 15

Service Annual Survey - 15

Research Data Center - 15

Master Address File - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 14

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 14

Standard Industrial Classification - 14

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 13

Personally Identifiable Information - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

Census Bureau Business Register - 12

Person Identification Validation System - 11

Longitudinal Business Database - 11

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 11

Office of Management and Budget - 10

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 10

Unemployment Insurance - 10

1940 Census - 9

Local Employment Dynamics - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 9

Administrative Records - 9

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 9

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 9

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 9

MAFID - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Ordinary Least Squares - 8

National Institute on Aging - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 7

Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 7

SSA Numident - 7

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Some Other Race - 6

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 6

Postal Service - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 6

Department of Labor - 6

Individual Characteristics File - 5

Census Edited File - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

W-2 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Census Numident - 5

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 5

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 5

CATI - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

Business Master File - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Company Organization Survey - 4

Employment History File - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

CDF - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Data Management System - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 4

PIKed - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

MAF-ARF - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

American Economic Association - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Retail Trade - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

University of Maryland - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Business Employment Dynamics - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

Centers for Medicare - 3

Federal Reserve Bank - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

PSID - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Census of Manufactures - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

AKM - 3

survey - 57

population - 46

respondent - 42

census data - 36

data - 36

data census - 34

statistical - 25

agency - 24

report - 21

workforce - 21

research census - 21

employed - 20

record - 20

economic census - 19

estimating - 19

2010 census - 18

labor - 18

census research - 18

use census - 17

census survey - 17

microdata - 16

employ - 15

hispanic - 14

resident - 14

datasets - 14

employee - 14

minority - 13

ethnicity - 13

census employment - 13

longitudinal - 13

coverage - 12

payroll - 11

household surveys - 11

employer household - 11

aging - 11

census use - 10

earnings - 9

work census - 9

censuses surveys - 9

provided census - 9

population survey - 9

prevalence - 9

disclosure - 9

enrollment - 9

records census - 9

trend - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

department - 8

assessed - 8

information census - 8

estimation - 8

immigrant - 8

residential - 8

census records - 8

family - 8

federal - 8

census years - 8

citizen - 8

ethnic - 8

surveys censuses - 8

matching - 8

race - 8

race census - 8

expenditure - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

percentile - 7

census responses - 7

employment statistics - 7

employee data - 7

census 2020 - 7

salary - 7

sector - 7

residence - 7

poverty - 7

linked census - 7

linkage - 7

analysis - 7

imputation - 7

metropolitan - 7

employment dynamics - 7

census disclosure - 6

employment data - 6

irs - 6

disparity - 6

aggregate - 6

average - 6

sampling - 6

information - 6

disadvantaged - 6

1040 - 6

privacy - 6

public - 6

census linked - 6

medicaid - 6

identifier - 6

racial - 6

census business - 6

econometric - 6

research - 6

hiring - 6

workplace - 6

census file - 6

worker demographics - 6

job - 6

survey data - 5

earner - 5

survey income - 5

state - 5

taxpayer - 5

child - 5

unemployed - 5

confidentiality - 5

publicly - 5

neighborhood - 5

quarterly - 5

economist - 5

yearly - 5

researcher - 5

occupation - 5

clerical - 5

ancestry - 5

labor statistics - 5

database - 5

statistician - 5

study - 5

ssa - 4

migration - 4

tax - 4

census household - 4

health - 4

policymakers - 4

insurance - 4

gdp - 4

healthcare - 4

immigration - 4

market - 4

assessing - 4

establishment - 4

associate - 4

tenure - 4

matched - 4

residing - 3

decade - 3

estimator - 3

migrant - 3

income individuals - 3

parent - 3

dependent - 3

household income - 3

income data - 3

income households - 3

environmental - 3

geographic - 3

impact - 3

survey households - 3

pandemic - 3

parental - 3

adoption - 3

bias - 3

black - 3

socioeconomic - 3

incorporated - 3

econometrician - 3

finance - 3

firms census - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

enrollee - 3

layoff - 3

welfare - 3

discrimination - 3

businesses census - 3

empirical - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 88


  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Graduate Coverage of Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes

    September 2025

    Authors: Cody Orr

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-61

    This paper proposes a new methodology for estimating the coverage rate of the Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes data product (PSEO), both as a share of new graduates and as a share of total working-age degree holders in the United States. This paper also assesses how representative PSEO is of the broader population of college graduates across an array of institutional and individual characteristics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-57

    For the last half-century, it has been a common and accepted practice for statistical agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, to adopt different strategies to protect the confidentiality of aggregate tabular data products from those used to protect the individual records contained in publicly released microdata products. This strategy was premised on the assumption that the aggregation used to generate tabular data products made the resulting statistics inherently less disclosive than the microdata from which they were tabulated. Consistent with this common assumption, the 2010 Census of Population and Housing in the U.S. used different disclosure limitation rules for its tabular and microdata publications. This paper demonstrates that, in the context of disclosure limitation for the 2010 Census, the assumption that tabular data are inherently less disclosive than their underlying microdata is fundamentally flawed. The 2010 Census published more than 150 billion aggregate statistics in 180 table sets. Most of these tables were published at the most detailed geographic level'individual census blocks, which can have populations as small as one person. Using only 34 of the published table sets, we reconstructed microdata records including five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) from the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using only published data, an attacker using our methods can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. We further confirm, through reidentification studies, that an attacker can, within census blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with race and ethnicity different from the modal person on the census block) with 95% accuracy. Having shown the vulnerabilities inherent to the disclosure limitation methods used for the 2010 Census, we proceed to demonstrate that the more robust disclosure limitation framework used for the 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction. Finally, we show that available alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System would either fail to protect confidentiality, or would overly degrade the statistics' utility for the primary statutory use case: redrawing the boundaries of all of the nation's legislative and voting districts in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Earnings Measurement Error, Nonresponse and Administrative Mismatch in the CPS

    July 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-48

    Using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement matched to Social Security Administration Detailed Earnings Records, we link observations across consecutive years to investigate a relationship between item nonresponse and measurement error in the earnings questions. Linking individuals across consecutive years allows us to observe switching from response to nonresponse and vice versa. We estimate OLS, IV, and finite mixture models that allow for various assumptions separately for men and women. We find that those who respond in both years of the survey exhibit less measurement error than those who respond in one year. Our findings suggest a trade-off between survey response and data quality that should be considered by survey designers, data collectors, and data users.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-36

    Timely business-level measures of work from home (WFH) are scarce for the U.S. economy. We review prior survey-based efforts to quantify the incidence and character of WFH and describe new questions that we developed and fielded for the Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS). Drawing on more than 150,000 firm-level responses to the BTOS, we obtain four main findings. First, nearly a third of businesses have employees who work from home, with tremendous variation across sectors. The share of businesses with WFH employees is nearly ten times larger in the Information sector than in Accommodation and Food Services. Second, employees work from home about 1 day per week, on average, and businesses expect similar WFH levels in five years. Third, feasibility aside, businesses' largest concern with WFH relates to productivity. Seven percent of businesses find that onsite work is more productive, while two percent find that WFH is more productive. Fourth, there is a low level of tracking and monitoring of WFH activities, with 70% of firms reporting they do not track employee days in the office and 75% reporting they do not monitor employees when they work from home. These lessons serve as a starting point for enhancing WFH-related content in the American Community Survey and other household surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Geographic Immobility in the United States: Assessing the Prevalence and Characteristics of Those Who Never Migrate Across State Lines Using Linked Federal Tax Microdata

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-19

    This paper explores the prevalence and characteristics of those who never migrate at the state scale in the U.S. Studying people who never migrate requires regular and frequent observation of their residential location for a lifetime, or at least for many years. A novel U.S. population-sized longitudinal dataset that links individual level Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) administrative records supplies this information annually, along with information on income and socio-demographic characteristics. We use these administrative microdata to follow a cohort aged between 15 and 50 in 2001 from 2001 to 2016, differentiating those who lived in the same state every year during this period (i.e., never made an interstate move) from those who lived in more than one state (i.e., made at least one interstate move). We find those who never made an interstate move comprised 75 percent of the total population of this age cohort. This percentage varies by year of age but never falls below 62 percent even for those who were teenagers or young adults in 2001. There are also variations in these percentages by sex, race, nativity, and income, with the latter having the largest effects. We also find substantial variation in these percentages across states. Our findings suggest a need for more research on geographically immobile populations in U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Potential Bias When Using Administrative Data to Measure the Family Income of School-Aged Children

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-03

    Researchers and practitioners increasingly rely on administrative data sources to measure family income. However, administrative data sources are often incomplete in their coverage of the population, giving rise to potential bias in family income measures, particularly if coverage deficiencies are not well understood. We focus on the school-aged child population, due to its particular import to research and policy, and because of the unique challenges of linking children to family income information. We find that two of the most significant administrative sources of family income information that permit linking of children and parents'IRS Form 1040 and SNAP participation records'usefully complement each other, potentially reducing coverage bias when used together. In a case study considering how best to measure economic disadvantage rates in the public school student population, we demonstrate the sensitivity of family income statistics to assumptions about individuals who do not appear in administrative data sources.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    CTC and ACTC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2020

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-76

    The Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) offer assistance to help ease the financial burden of families with children. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the CTC and ACTC covering tax year 2020. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2021 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify CTC/ACTC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2020, eligible taxpayers participated in the CTC and ACTC program at a rate of 93 percent while dollar participation was 91 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    EITC Participation Results and IRS-Census Match Methodology, Tax Year 2021

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-75

    The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), enacted in 1975, offers a refundable tax credit to low income working families. This paper provides taxpayer and dollar participation estimates for the EITC covering tax year 2021. The estimates derive from an approach that relies on linking the 2022 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) to IRS administrative data. This approach, called the Exact Match, uses survey data to identify EITC eligible taxpayers and IRS administrative data to indicate which eligible taxpayers claimed and received the credit. Overall in tax year 2021 eligible taxpayers participated in the EITC program at a rate of 78 percent while dollar participation was 81 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Privacy-Protected Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-74

    This paper introduces the Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame (Gridded EIF), a novel privacy-protected dataset derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's confidential Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) microdata infrastructure. The EIF combines comprehensive administrative records and survey data on the U.S. population with high-resolution geospatial information on environmental hazards. While access to the EIF is restricted due to the confidential nature of the underlying data, the Gridded EIF offers a broader research community the opportunity to glean insights from the data while preserving confidentiality. We describe the data and privacy protection process, and offer guidance on appropriate usage, presenting practical applications.
    View Full Paper PDF