CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'American Community Survey'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 115

Protected Identification Key - 102

Internal Revenue Service - 97

Current Population Survey - 84

Social Security Administration - 81

Decennial Census - 79

Social Security Number - 76

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 73

Disclosure Review Board - 66

2020 Census - 63

National Science Foundation - 61

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 58

North American Industry Classification System - 57

Social Security - 51

Ordinary Least Squares - 50

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 48

Center for Economic Studies - 45

Longitudinal Business Database - 42

Person Validation System - 42

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 39

Master Address File - 36

Employer Identification Number - 35

W-2 - 35

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 32

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 29

Person Identification Validation System - 28

Research Data Center - 28

Unemployment Insurance - 27

Housing and Urban Development - 27

Personally Identifiable Information - 27

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 26

Office of Management and Budget - 25

Census Numident - 25

Business Register - 24

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

National Bureau of Economic Research - 23

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 23

Service Annual Survey - 23

University of Chicago - 22

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 22

Federal Reserve Bank - 21

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 21

Cornell University - 20

1990 Census - 19

Administrative Records - 19

National Center for Health Statistics - 19

Census 2000 - 19

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 18

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 18

Core Based Statistical Area - 18

Special Sworn Status - 18

Census Bureau Business Register - 17

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 17

International Trade Research Report - 17

Indian Health Service - 17

Earned Income Tax Credit - 16

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Department of Labor - 15

Census Household Composition Key - 15

Adjusted Gross Income - 15

American Housing Survey - 15

Some Other Race - 15

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 15

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 15

Economic Census - 14

SSA Numident - 14

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 14

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 14

Individual Characteristics File - 14

Medicaid Services - 14

Public Use Micro Sample - 14

Department of Health and Human Services - 14

National Institute on Aging - 13

PSID - 13

Data Management System - 12

MAF-ARF - 12

Employer Characteristics File - 12

Composite Person Record - 12

Social and Economic Supplement - 12

American Economic Association - 12

Postal Service - 12

Census Bureau Master Address File - 11

Business Dynamics Statistics - 11

PIKed - 11

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 11

National Institutes of Health - 11

Local Employment Dynamics - 11

County Business Patterns - 10

Retail Trade - 10

Indian Housing Information Center - 10

COVID-19 - 10

Office of Personnel Management - 10

Employment History File - 10

Harvard University - 10

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 10

University of Michigan - 10

Supreme Court - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

Department of Agriculture - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Environmental Protection Agency - 9

Census Edited File - 9

Pew Research Center - 9

Occupational Employment Statistics - 9

Total Factor Productivity - 9

Centers for Medicare - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research - 9

Economic Research Service - 8

Disability Insurance - 8

National Academy of Sciences - 8

Department of Education - 8

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 8

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 8

General Education Development - 8

ASEC - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

MAFID - 7

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 7

Social Science Research Institute - 7

Sloan Foundation - 7

New York University - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

University of Maryland - 7

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

Urban Institute - 7

American Statistical Association - 7

University of Minnesota - 7

Geographic Information Systems - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

CDF - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

NUMIDENT - 6

World Bank - 6

Patent and Trademark Office - 6

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 6

AKM - 6

Census of Manufactures - 6

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Department of Defense - 6

National Health Interview Survey - 6

AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component - 6

Federal Insurance Contributions Act - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

New York Times - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 5

Cobb-Douglas - 5

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Health and Retirement Study - 5

Detailed Earnings Records - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Employer-Household Dynamics - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Statistics Canada - 5

Georgetown University - 5

Census Industry Code - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 5

Educational Services - 5

Health Care and Social Assistance - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Minnesota Population Center - 5

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Federal Register - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

World Trade Organization - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Princeton University - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Generalized Method of Moments - 4

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 4

2SLS - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Linear Probability Model - 4

Duke University - 4

Stanford University - 4

Penn State University - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Small Business Administration - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

United Nations - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

George Mason University - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Yale University - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

European Union - 3

National Research Council - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Akaike Information Criterion - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

North American Free Trade Agreement - 3

Journal of Political Economy - 3

Annual Business Survey - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Public Administration - 3

Business Master File - 3

Business Employment Dynamics - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

household - 90

population - 75

survey - 62

ethnicity - 59

workforce - 58

hispanic - 53

employed - 52

employ - 51

respondent - 48

ethnic - 46

immigrant - 46

labor - 45

resident - 43

recession - 43

minority - 40

poverty - 39

census data - 39

earnings - 37

racial - 36

race - 36

census bureau - 35

disparity - 35

disadvantaged - 34

housing - 34

socioeconomic - 34

residence - 34

data - 33

immigration - 32

neighborhood - 29

metropolitan - 28

employee - 27

migrant - 27

residential - 26

data census - 26

enrollment - 26

payroll - 25

welfare - 25

agency - 25

statistical - 25

economist - 24

segregation - 23

estimating - 22

unemployed - 21

migration - 21

salary - 20

intergenerational - 20

citizen - 20

medicaid - 20

family - 20

white - 20

microdata - 19

use census - 19

job - 19

record - 19

heterogeneity - 19

occupation - 18

federal - 18

datasets - 18

expenditure - 17

imputation - 17

irs - 17

census employment - 17

worker - 17

earner - 17

native - 17

black - 17

coverage - 16

tax - 16

latino - 16

endogeneity - 16

disclosure - 16

mexican - 15

census response - 15

econometric - 15

insurance - 15

employment statistics - 15

rent - 14

census survey - 14

relocation - 14

migrating - 14

state - 14

discrimination - 14

census research - 14

report - 13

economically - 13

migrate - 13

entrepreneurship - 13

workplace - 13

bias - 12

1040 - 12

earn - 12

segregated - 12

home - 12

percentile - 12

ancestry - 12

census records - 12

statistician - 12

2010 census - 12

rural - 12

assessed - 11

employment data - 11

filing - 11

urban - 11

medicare - 11

entrepreneur - 11

estimation - 11

quarterly - 11

revenue - 10

impact - 10

industrial - 10

research census - 10

mobility - 10

graduate - 10

city - 10

suburb - 10

parent - 10

gdp - 10

hiring - 10

privacy - 10

confidentiality - 10

work census - 10

taxpayer - 9

child - 9

environmental - 9

household survey - 9

survey income - 9

wealth - 9

parental - 9

surveys censuses - 9

geographically - 9

geographic - 9

sector - 9

retirement - 9

database - 9

public - 9

unemployment rates - 9

analysis - 9

healthcare - 9

assimilation - 9

employer household - 9

prevalence - 9

incentive - 8

linked census - 8

emission - 8

pollutant - 8

pollution - 8

survey census - 8

census household - 8

moving - 8

generation - 8

ssa - 8

race census - 8

relocate - 8

citizenship - 8

reside - 8

indian - 8

macroeconomic - 8

multiracial - 8

renter - 8

birth - 8

census 2020 - 8

regress - 8

mortality - 8

census use - 8

information - 8

clerical - 8

census linked - 7

sampling - 7

income data - 7

adoption - 7

records census - 7

eligibility - 7

enrolled - 7

immigrated - 7

matching - 7

refugee - 7

researcher - 7

educated - 7

education - 7

employment earnings - 7

geography - 7

venture - 7

proprietor - 7

regression - 7

fertility - 7

trend - 7

policy - 7

worker demographics - 7

longitudinal employer - 7

uninsured - 7

establishment - 7

aggregate - 7

proprietorship - 7

survey data - 7

saving - 6

dependent - 6

investment - 6

profit - 6

interracial - 6

market - 6

innovation - 6

residential segregation - 6

marriage - 6

couple - 6

community - 6

asian - 6

residing - 6

commute - 6

ethnically - 6

relocating - 6

subsidized - 6

maternal - 6

poor - 6

associate - 6

labor statistics - 6

subsidy - 6

unobserved - 6

exogeneity - 6

pollution exposure - 6

department - 6

employee data - 6

employment estimates - 6

estimates employment - 6

country - 6

poorer - 5

amenity - 5

manufacturing - 5

income survey - 5

incorporated - 5

employing - 5

benefit - 5

eligible - 5

disability - 5

hurricane - 5

enrollee - 5

finance - 5

income children - 5

shift - 5

spillover - 5

income households - 5

mother - 5

recessionary - 5

schooling - 5

information census - 5

estimator - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

innovate - 5

regressing - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

publicly - 5

premium - 5

health insurance - 5

insured - 5

exposure - 5

pregnancy - 5

effects employment - 5

employment count - 5

health - 5

research - 5

enterprise - 5

area - 5

workers earnings - 5

censuses surveys - 5

longitudinal - 5

reporting - 5

homeowner - 4

midwest - 4

warehousing - 4

employment trends - 4

pandemic - 4

tenure - 4

exemption - 4

policymakers - 4

parents income - 4

technological - 4

pension - 4

income neighborhoods - 4

recession exposure - 4

study - 4

woman - 4

enforcement - 4

insurer - 4

demand - 4

student - 4

women earnings - 4

crime - 4

manufacturer - 4

regional - 4

regulation - 4

concentration - 4

workforce indicators - 4

demography - 4

immigrant populations - 4

employment measures - 4

cohort - 4

opportunity - 4

employment wages - 4

earnings inequality - 4

district - 4

decade - 4

divorced - 4

employment dynamics - 4

measures employment - 4

taxation - 4

employment unemployment - 4

census file - 4

assessing - 4

organizational - 4

specialization - 4

census years - 3

export - 3

outsource - 3

estimates pollution - 3

discriminatory - 3

college - 3

financial - 3

earnings age - 3

sociology - 3

town - 3

loan - 3

household income - 3

house - 3

mortgage - 3

growth - 3

employment growth - 3

industry wages - 3

wage growth - 3

aging - 3

retiree - 3

discrepancy - 3

hire - 3

linkage - 3

social - 3

gender - 3

inventory - 3

patent - 3

patenting - 3

immigrant entrepreneurs - 3

innovative - 3

insurance premiums - 3

locality - 3

wage industries - 3

wage effects - 3

bankruptcy - 3

epa - 3

tribe - 3

polluting - 3

technology - 3

debt - 3

region - 3

econometrician - 3

effect wages - 3

economic census - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

housing survey - 3

fiscal - 3

earnings workers - 3

state employment - 3

indicator - 3

inference - 3

employer businesses - 3

production - 3

insurance coverage - 3

consumer - 3

model - 3

coverage employer - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 251


  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: Tip Reporting at U.S. Restaurants, 2005-2018

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-68

    Tipping is a significant form of compensation for many restaurant jobs, but it is poorly measured and therefore not well understood. We combine several large administrative and survey datasets and document patterns in tip reporting that are consistent with systematic under-reporting of tip income. Our analysis indicates that although the vast majority of tipped workers do report earning some tips, the dollar value of tips is under-reported and is sensitive to reporting incentives. In total, we estimate that about eight billion in tips paid at full-service, single-location, restaurants were not captured in tax data annually over the period 2005-2018. Due to changes in payment methods and reporting incentives, tip reporting has increased over time. Our findings have implications for downstream measures dependent on accurate measures of compensation including poverty measurement among tipped restaurant workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    From Marcy to Madison Square? The Effects of Growing Up in Public Housing on Early Adulthood Outcomes

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-67

    This paper studies the effects of growing up in public housing in New York City on children's long-run outcomes. Using linked administrative data, we exploit variation in the age children move into public housing to estimate the effects of spending an additional year of childhood in public housing on a range of economic and social outcomes in early adulthood. We find that childhood exposure to public housing improves labor market outcomes and reduces participation in federal safety net programs, particularly for children from the most disadvantaged families. Additionally, we find there is some heterogeneity in impacts across public housing developments. Developments located in neighborhoods with relatively fewer renters and higher household incomes are better for children overall. Our estimate of the marginal value of public funds suggests that for every $1 the government spends per child on public housing, children receive $1.40 in benefits, including $2.30 for children from the most disadvantaged families.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Census Historical Environmental Impacts Frame

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-66

    The Census Bureau's Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) is a microdata infrastructure that combines individual-level information on residence, demographics, and economic characteristics with environmental amenities and hazards from 1999 through the present day. To better understand the long-run consequences and intergenerational effects of exposure to a changing environment, we expand the EIF by extending it backward to 1940. The Historical Environmental Impacts Frame (HEIF) combines the Census Bureau's historical administrative data, publicly available 1940 address information from the 1940 Decennial Census, and historical environmental data. This paper discusses the creation of the HEIF as well as the unique challenges that arise with using the Census Bureau's historical administrative data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The China Shock Revisited: Job Reallocation and Industry Switching in U.S. Labor Markets

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-65

    Using confidential administrative data from the U.S. Census Bureau we revisit how the rise in Chinese import penetration has reshaped U.S. local labor markets. Local labor markets more exposed to the China shock experienced larger reallocation from manufacturing to services jobs. Most of this reallocation occurred within firms that simultaneously contracted manufacturing operations while expanding employment in services. Notably, about 40% of the manufacturing job loss effect is due to continuing establishments switching their primary activity from manufacturing to trade-related services such as research, management, and wholesale. The effects of Chinese import penetration vary by local labor market characteristics. In areas with high human capital, including much of the West Coast and large cities, job reallocation from manufacturing to services has been substantial. In areas with low human capital and a high initial manufacturing share, including much of the Midwest and the South, we find limited job reallocation. We estimate this differential response to the China shock accounts for half of the 1997-2007 job growth gap between these regions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Income, Wealth, and Environmental Inequality in the United States

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-57

    This paper explores the relationships between air pollution, income, wealth, and race by combining administrative data from U.S. tax returns between 1979'2016, various measures of air pollution, and sociodemographic information from linked survey and administrative data. In the first year of our data, the relationship between income and ambient pollution levels nationally is approximately zero for both non-Hispanic White and Black individuals. However, at every single percentile of the national income distribution, Black individuals are exposed to, on average, higher levels of pollution than White individuals. By 2016, the relationship between income and air pollution had steepened, primarily for Black individuals, driven by changes in where rich and poor Black individuals live. We utilize quasi-random shocks to income to examine the causal effect of changes in income and wealth on pollution exposure over a five year horizon, finding that these income'pollution elasticities map closely to the values implied by our descriptive patterns. We calculate that Black-White differences in income can explain ~10 percent of the observed gap in air pollution levels in 2016.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Revisions to the LEHD Establishment Imputation Procedure and Applications to Administrative Job Frame

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-51

    The Census Bureau is developing a 'job frame' to provide detailed job-level employment data across the U.S. through linked administrative records such as unemployment insurance and IRS W-2 filings. This working paper summarizes the research conducted by the job frame development team on modifying and extending the LEHD Unit-to-Worker (U2W) imputation procedure for the job frame prototype. It provides a conceptual overview of the U2W imputation method, highlighting key challenges and tradeoffs in its current application. The paper then presents four imputation methodologies and evaluates their performance in areas such as establishment assignment accuracy, establishment size matching, and job separation rates. The results show that all methodologies perform similarly in assigning workers to the correct establishment. Non-spell-based methodologies excel in matching establishment sizes, while spell-based methodologies perform better in accurately tracking separation rates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparison of Child Reporting in the American Community Survey and Federal Income Tax Returns Based on California Birth Records

    September 2024

    Authors: Gloria Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-55

    This paper takes advantage of administrative records from California, a state with a large child population and a significant historical undercount of children in Census Bureau data, dependent information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1040 records, and the American Community Survey to characterize undercounted children and compare child reporting. While IRS Form 1040 records offer potential utility for adjusting child undercounting in Census Bureau surveys, this analysis finds overlapping reporting issues among various demographic and economic groups. Specifically, older children, those of Non-Hispanic Black mothers and Hispanic mothers, children or parents with lower English proficiency, children whose mothers did not complete high school, and families with lower income-to-poverty ratio were less frequently reported in IRS 1040 records than other groups. Therefore, using IRS 1040 dependent records may have limitations for accurately representing populations with characteristics associated with the undercount of children in surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Food Assistance Work Requirements on Labor Market Outcomes

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-54

    The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly named the Food Stamp Program, has long been an integral part of the US social safety net. During US welfare reforms in the mid-1990s, SNAP eligibility became more restrictive with legislation citing a need to improve self-sufficiency of participating households. As a result, legislatures created two of these eligibility requirements: the General Work Requirement (GWR), which forces an adult to work to receive benefits, and the Able-Bodied Adult Without Dependents (ABAWD) work requirement, which requires certain adults to work a certain number of hours to receive benefits. Using restricted-access SNAP microdata from nine states, we exploit age cutoffs of the ABAWD work requirement and General Work Requirement (GWR) to estimate the effect of these policies on labor outcomes. We find that at the ABAWD age cutoff, there is no statistically significant evidence of a discontinuity across static and dynamic employment outcomes. At the GWR age cutoff, unemployed SNAP users and SNAP-eligible adults are on average more likely to leave the labor force than to continue to search for work.
    View Full Paper PDF