CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 134

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 130

Disclosure Review Board - 126

North American Industry Classification System - 122

Internal Revenue Service - 113

Longitudinal Business Database - 112

Protected Identification Key - 89

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 80

Current Population Survey - 78

Social Security Administration - 77

Center for Economic Studies - 67

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 67

National Science Foundation - 63

Social Security Number - 62

Ordinary Least Squares - 60

Decennial Census - 58

Employer Identification Numbers - 57

Social Security - 52

Business Register - 44

National Bureau of Economic Research - 44

W-2 - 42

Person Validation System - 42

Economic Census - 36

Federal Reserve Bank - 35

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 33

2010 Census - 33

Census Bureau Business Register - 31

Business Dynamics Statistics - 31

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 29

Census Numident - 28

Total Factor Productivity - 27

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 27

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 26

Standard Industrial Classification - 25

Census of Manufactures - 24

Person Identification Validation System - 24

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 23

Master Address File - 23

Personally Identifiable Information - 22

Adjusted Gross Income - 22

COVID-19 - 22

Federal Reserve System - 22

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Housing and Urban Development - 21

County Business Patterns - 21

Annual Business Survey - 20

Department of Homeland Security - 20

Department of Economics - 19

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 19

Survey of Business Owners - 18

Accommodation and Food Services - 18

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Cobb-Douglas - 17

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 17

Special Sworn Status - 17

Unemployment Insurance - 17

Patent and Trademark Office - 16

Technical Services - 16

National Center for Health Statistics - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 16

Earned Income Tax Credit - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Data Management System - 16

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 16

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 15

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Cornell University - 15

University of Maryland - 15

PSID - 15

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 15

Department of Labor - 14

1940 Census - 14

International Trade Research Report - 14

Census Household Composition Key - 14

National Institutes of Health - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

National Institute on Aging - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Indian Health Service - 13

Retail Trade - 12

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 12

General Accounting Office - 12

ASEC - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

Arts, Entertainment - 11

Census Edited File - 11

Some Other Race - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 11

Board of Governors - 11

Postal Service - 11

University of Chicago - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

American Economic Association - 11

Wholesale Trade - 10

Securities and Exchange Commission - 10

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 10

Department of Education - 10

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 10

Harmonized System - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

AKM - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Disability Insurance - 10

SSA Numident - 10

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 10

New York University - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

National Employer Survey - 9

United States Census Bureau - 9

MAFID - 9

World Trade Organization - 9

American Housing Survey - 9

University of Michigan - 9

Supreme Court - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Educational Services - 8

IQR - 8

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

Russell Sage Foundation - 8

Customs and Border Protection - 8

European Union - 8

Department of Agriculture - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Health Care and Social Assistance - 8

Energy Information Administration - 8

Sloan Foundation - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Pew Research Center - 8

Company Organization Survey - 7

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Occupational Employment Statistics - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Stanford University - 7

Federal Register - 7

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 7

Professional Services - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

Employment History File - 7

UC Berkeley - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Business Formation Statistics - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Department of Justice - 7

White Non-Hispanic - 6

National Income and Product Accounts - 6

Public Administration - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Research and Development - 6

Legal Form of Organization - 6

Yale University - 6

CPS ASEC - 6

IBM - 6

Initial Public Offering - 6

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 6

Urban Institute - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Department of Energy - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Agriculture, Forestry - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Harvard University - 5

Boston College - 5

Administrative Records - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

PIKed - 5

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 5

George Mason University - 5

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 5

Retirement History Survey - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

LEHD Program - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

North American Free Trade Agreement - 4

Columbia University - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

University of Toronto - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

IZA - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Net Present Value - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Limited Liability Company - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Princeton University - 4

2SLS - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPR - 4

European Commission - 4

World Bank - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 3

United States Patent - 3

Census of Services - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

United Nations - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Penn State University - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

CDF - 3

Cumulative Density Function - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Business Services - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

TFPQ - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Foreign Direct Investment - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

National Research Council - 3

John Voorheis - 21

Lucia Foster - 20

John Haltiwanger - 16

John M. Abowd - 14

Nathan Goldschlag - 12

J. David Brown - 11

Jonathan Eggleston - 10

Emin Dinlersoz - 10

Sonya R. Porter - 10

Fariha Kamal - 9

Catherine Buffington - 9

Moises Yi - 9

Lars Vilhuber - 8

Maggie R. Jones - 8

Kevin Rinz - 8

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 7

Zachary Kroff - 7

Cheryl Grim - 6

Zoltan Wolf - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Martha Stinson - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Jonathan Colmer - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Kevin L. McKinney - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Joseph Staudt - 5

Ariel J. Binder - 5

Nikolas Zolas - 5

Thomas B. Foster - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Leah R. Clark - 5

Kendall Houghton - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

G. Jacob Blackwood - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Ryan Monarch - 4

Nicholas Bloom - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Erik Brynjolfsson - 4

Teresa C. Fort - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Charles Hokayem - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Amanda Eng - 4

Reed Walker - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 4

Leticia Fernandez - 4

Danielle H. Sandler - 4

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Kristin Sandusky - 3

Ethan Lewis - 3

Robert Ashmead - 3

Daniel Kifer - 3

Philip Leclerc - 3

Rolando A. Rodríguez - 3

Tamara Adams - 3

David Darais - 3

Sourya Dey - 3

Simson L. Garfinkel - 3

Scott Moore - 3

Ramy N. Tadros - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Steven J. Davis - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Peter Schott - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Richard Mansfield - 3

Ethan Krohn - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Adela Luque - 3

Carl Lieberman - 3

Garrett Anstreicher - 3

Gale Boyd - 3

Matthew Doolin - 3

James M. Noon - 3

James P. Ziliak - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

Sharon R. Ennis - 3

Matthew Staiger - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Sarah Miller - 3

Laura Wherry - 3

Javier Miranda - 3

Shawn Klimek - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

earnings - 60

employed - 59

labor - 58

employ - 57

population - 55

workforce - 54

survey - 52

recession - 49

respondent - 44

ethnicity - 40

hispanic - 34

manufacturing - 33

employee - 33

market - 33

minority - 32

disparity - 32

immigrant - 32

disadvantaged - 31

innovation - 31

economist - 30

revenue - 30

sector - 30

payroll - 30

census bureau - 28

entrepreneur - 27

earner - 27

estimating - 26

disclosure - 26

growth - 26

poverty - 26

resident - 26

investment - 26

entrepreneurship - 25

company - 25

racial - 25

economically - 25

industrial - 25

salary - 24

expenditure - 24

ethnic - 24

census data - 23

statistical - 23

enterprise - 23

socioeconomic - 23

race - 23

export - 23

irs - 23

immigration - 23

gdp - 22

tax - 22

neighborhood - 21

macroeconomic - 21

patent - 21

production - 21

econometric - 21

hiring - 20

sale - 20

residence - 20

agency - 20

trend - 19

housing - 19

spillover - 19

welfare - 19

data census - 18

demand - 18

venture - 18

finance - 18

heterogeneity - 18

worker - 18

unemployed - 18

data - 18

import - 17

financial - 17

migrant - 17

percentile - 16

enrollment - 16

report - 16

segregation - 16

rent - 16

incentive - 16

endogeneity - 16

1040 - 16

quarterly - 15

corporation - 15

family - 15

entrepreneurial - 15

intergenerational - 15

citizen - 15

occupation - 14

residential - 14

technological - 14

loan - 14

relocation - 14

use census - 13

inventory - 13

record - 13

eligibility - 13

investor - 13

exporter - 13

impact - 13

patenting - 13

discrimination - 13

microdata - 13

taxpayer - 13

graduate - 12

earn - 12

state - 12

rural - 12

funding - 12

job - 12

hire - 12

establishment - 12

datasets - 12

federal - 12

aggregate - 11

imputation - 11

proprietor - 11

census responses - 11

wealth - 11

importer - 11

estimation - 11

manufacturer - 11

black - 11

researcher - 11

medicaid - 11

bias - 11

census employment - 10

parent - 10

innovate - 10

employment growth - 10

white - 10

migration - 10

productivity growth - 9

efficiency - 9

incorporated - 9

parental - 9

child - 9

coverage - 9

proprietorship - 9

assessed - 9

retirement - 9

home - 9

renter - 9

community - 9

pandemic - 9

metropolitan - 9

trading - 9

lender - 9

employment earnings - 9

financing - 9

household surveys - 9

monopolistic - 9

native - 9

urban - 9

migrate - 9

profit - 9

filing - 9

environmental - 9

emission - 9

census household - 9

mexican - 9

commerce - 8

eligible - 8

enrolled - 8

census disclosure - 8

mortgage - 8

ssa - 8

labor markets - 8

prevalence - 8

acquisition - 8

poorer - 8

shipment - 8

multinational - 8

supplier - 8

imported - 8

borrower - 8

lending - 8

debt - 8

produce - 8

invention - 8

innovative - 8

productive - 8

innovating - 8

organizational - 8

city - 8

migrating - 8

geographically - 8

dependent - 8

income data - 8

pollution - 8

economic census - 7

retailer - 7

wholesale - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

generation - 7

homeowner - 7

insurance - 7

latino - 7

segregated - 7

price - 7

consumption - 7

tariff - 7

exporting - 7

investing - 7

invest - 7

census survey - 7

subsidy - 7

startup - 7

relocate - 7

employment statistics - 7

mobility - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

stock - 7

bank - 7

exogeneity - 7

confidentiality - 7

woman - 7

saving - 7

regional - 7

adoption - 7

competitor - 7

workers earnings - 7

sampling - 6

university - 6

opportunity - 6

associate - 6

institutional - 6

warehousing - 6

database - 6

labor statistics - 6

regress - 6

maternal - 6

mortality - 6

asian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

founder - 6

credit - 6

importing - 6

earnings employees - 6

equity - 6

fund - 6

2010 census - 6

prospect - 6

security - 6

technology - 6

growth productivity - 6

innovator - 6

employment estimates - 6

employment data - 6

workplace - 6

employment trends - 6

borrowing - 6

banking - 6

leverage - 6

provided census - 6

epa - 6

pollution exposure - 6

sectoral - 6

monopolistically - 6

pollutant - 6

policymakers - 6

birth - 6

analysis - 6

research - 6

accounting - 6

average - 5

wage gap - 5

educated - 5

measures productivity - 5

aggregate productivity - 5

spending - 5

subsidiary - 5

retail - 5

merchandise - 5

degree - 5

decade - 5

education - 5

house - 5

indian - 5

benefit - 5

suburb - 5

international trade - 5

foreign - 5

firms export - 5

multinational firms - 5

creditor - 5

commodity - 5

exported - 5

risk - 5

sociology - 5

effects employment - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity shocks - 5

factory - 5

region - 5

unobserved - 5

longitudinal - 5

census records - 5

shift - 5

survey households - 5

population survey - 5

geographic - 5

wage growth - 5

family income - 5

household income - 5

income households - 5

income children - 5

immigrant workers - 5

globalization - 5

public - 5

concentration - 5

exposure - 5

ownership - 5

linked census - 5

outsourced - 5

surveys censuses - 5

research census - 5

employing - 5

gender - 5

unemployment rates - 5

medicare - 5

externality - 5

study - 5

product - 5

industry concentration - 5

regressing - 5

estimator - 5

industry productivity - 5

regulation - 5

assimilation - 5

classified - 5

census research - 5

productivity measures - 5

reporting - 5

statistician - 5

assessing - 4

college - 4

earnings gap - 4

information census - 4

fiscal - 4

customer - 4

executive - 4

corporate - 4

merger - 4

grocery - 4

sector productivity - 4

residing - 4

career - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

schooling - 4

adulthood - 4

death - 4

disability - 4

country - 4

recessionary - 4

agriculture - 4

health - 4

residential segregation - 4

suburbanization - 4

technology adoption - 4

good - 4

consumer - 4

purchase - 4

downstream - 4

trader - 4

sourcing - 4

disaster - 4

hurricane - 4

town - 4

effect wages - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms patents - 4

patents firms - 4

factor productivity - 4

depreciation - 4

business startups - 4

area - 4

layoff - 4

developed - 4

patented - 4

employment dynamics - 4

worker demographics - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

employment distribution - 4

moving - 4

specialization - 4

shareholder - 4

bankruptcy - 4

borrow - 4

income individuals - 4

immigrated - 4

custom - 4

privacy - 4

publicly - 4

industry wages - 4

endogenous - 4

census linked - 4

labor productivity - 4

survey income - 4

tenure - 4

electricity - 4

energy - 4

earnings age - 4

employment wages - 4

taxation - 4

matching - 4

recession exposure - 4

subsidized - 4

cost - 4

indicator - 4

policy - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

renewable - 4

union - 4

fertility - 4

earnings workers - 4

employment measures - 4

censuses surveys - 4

budget - 3

rate - 3

sample - 3

consolidated - 3

department - 3

identifier - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

warehouse - 3

productivity variation - 3

mother - 3

preschool - 3

cohort - 3

midwest - 3

urbanized - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

export market - 3

affluent - 3

wage earnings - 3

crime - 3

asset - 3

firm patenting - 3

productivity dynamics - 3

wage effects - 3

patenting firms - 3

work census - 3

turnover - 3

collateral - 3

aging - 3

younger firms - 3

wages employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms young - 3

autoregressive - 3

growth employment - 3

shock - 3

information - 3

relocating - 3

firms import - 3

expense - 3

restaurant - 3

apartment - 3

location - 3

outsourcing - 3

exogenous - 3

income survey - 3

neighbor - 3

records census - 3

race census - 3

fuel - 3

larger firms - 3

interracial - 3

employment effects - 3

impact employment - 3

parents income - 3

earnings growth - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

volatility - 3

ancestry - 3

firms grow - 3

poor - 3

industry variation - 3

network - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

geography - 3

oligopolistic - 3

regulatory - 3

utility - 3

enforcement - 3

locality - 3

wage data - 3

polluting - 3

econometrician - 3

earnings inequality - 3

pregnancy - 3

mandate - 3

tech - 3

business data - 3

employer household - 3

employment count - 3

measures employment - 3

workforce indicators - 3

employed census - 3

statistical agencies - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 297


  • Working Paper

    Optimal Stratified Sampling for Probability-Based Online Panels

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-69

    Online probability-based panels have emerged as a cost-efficient means of conducting surveys in the 21st century. While there have been various recent advancements in sampling techniques for online panels, several critical aspects of sampling theory for online panels are lacking. Much of current sampling theory from the middle of the 20th century, when response rates were high, and online panels did not exist. This paper presents a mathematical model of stratified sampling for online panels that takes into account historical response rates and survey costs. Through some simplifying assumptions, the model shows that the optimal sample allocation for online panels can largely resemble the solution for a cross-sectional survey. To apply the model, I use the Census Household Panel to show how this method could improve the average precision of key estimates. Holding fielding costs constant, the new sample rates improve the average precision of estimates between 1.47 and 17.25 percent, depending on the importance weight given to an overall population mean compared to mean estimates for racial and ethnic subgroups.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Double-Pane Glass Ceiling: Commercial Engagement and the Female-Male Earnings Gap for Faculty

    September 2025

    Authors: Joseph Staudt

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-68

    I use administrative data from universities (UMETRICS) linked to the universe of confidential W-2 and 1040-C tax records to measure faculty commercial engagement and its role in female-male earnings gaps. Female faculty are 20 percentage points less likely to engage commercially, with the entire gap driven by self-employment. The raw earnings gap is $63,000 on a base of $162,000 and non-university earnings account for $18,000 (29 percent) of this total. Thus, while university pay explains most of the gap, commercial engagement substantially amplifies it. Earnings gaps appear in all components of non-university pay ' self-employment, and work for incumbent, young/startup, high-tech, and non-high-tech firms ' and remain large, though attenuated, after controlling publications, patents, field, university, scientific resources, age, marital status, childbearing, and demographics. Gaps widen as faculty move up the earnings distribution, and commercial engagement becomes a larger contributor. Men and women engage with similar industries, but men earn more in all shared industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Manufacturing Dispersion: How Data Cleaning Choices Affect Measured Misallocation and Productivity Growth in the Annual Survey of Manufactures

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-67

    Measurement of dispersion of productivity levels and productivity growth rates across businesses is a key input for answering a variety of important economic questions, such as understanding the allocation of economic inputs across businesses and over time. While item nonresponse is a readily quantifiable issue, we show there is also misreporting by respondents in the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM). Aware of these measurement issues, the Census Bureau edits and imputes survey responses before tabulation and dissemination. However, edit and imputation methods that are suitable for publishing aggregate totals may not be suitable for estimating other measures from the microdata. We show that the methods used dramatically affect estimates of productivity dispersion, allocative efficiency, and aggregate productivity growth. Using a Bayesian approach for editing and imputation, we model the joint distributions of all variables needed to estimate these measures, and we quantify the degree of uncertainty in the estimates due to imputations for faulty or missing data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    'Class of Customer' Question from the US Economic Census

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-66

    The Economic Census (EC) collects detailed information on the class of customers served by establishments'for example, the share of an establishment's sales to other businesses or to government entities'for a subset of sectors in the economy. In this paper, we evaluate the data from the 'Class of Customer' question from the EC, with a particular focus on sales to the government. These data have seldom been used in empirical research and are unique in that they enable researchers to link establishment-level Census data with information on government procurement. We compile and analyze large volumes of publicly available tabulated data about the class of customer question over time. Using these data, we document three main findings. First, total sales to government from establishments covered by the class of customer question account for approximately 4 percent of GDP'just under half of total government procurement as measured in the national accounts. Second, the sectoral distribution of government expenditure is significantly different from that of private sector spending. Certain industries, such as Construction and Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services, account for a much larger share of government expenditure relative to private sector expenditure. Third, sales to the government make up a substantial portion of total sales in several sectors'for instance, 70 percent in Facilities Support Services, 30 percent in Waste Treatment and Disposal, and 17 percent in Construction. Finally, we use the microdata to examine nonresponse rates to the class of customer question across establishments based on the number of employees.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Matching Compustat Data to the Longitudinal Business Database, 1976-2020

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-65

    This paper details the methodology for creating an updated Compustat-Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) bridge, facilitating linkage between company identifiers in Compustat and firm identifiers in the LBD. In addition to data from Compustat, we incorporate historical data on public companies from various public and private sources, including information on executive names. Our methodology involves a series of stages using fuzzy name and address matching, including EIN, telephone number, and industry code matching. Qualified researchers with approved proposals can access this bridge though the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers. The Compustat-SSL bridge serves as a crucial resource for longitudinal studies on U.S. businesses, corporate governance, and executive compensation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    National Chains and Trends in Retail Productivity Dispersion

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-64

    Productivity dispersion within an industry is an important characteristic of the business environment, potentially reflecting factors such as market structure, production technologies, and reallocation frictions. The retail trade sector saw significant changes between 1987 and 2017, and dispersion statistics can help characterize how it evolved over this period. In this paper, we shed light on this transformation by developing public-use Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP) data for the retail sector for 1987 through 2017. We find that from 1987 through 2017, dispersion increased between retail stores at the bottom and middle of the productivity distribution. However, when we weight stores by employment dispersion, the middle of the distribution is lower initially and decreases over time. These patterns are consistent with a retail landscape featuring more and more activity taking place in chain stores with similar productivity. Firm-based dispersion measures exhibit a similar pattern. Further investigation reveals that there is substantial heterogeneity in dispersion levels across industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Job Tasks, Worker Skills, and Productivity

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-63

    We present new empirical evidence suggesting that we can better understand productivity dispersion across businesses by accounting for differences in how tasks, skills, and occupations are organized. This aligns with growing attention to the task content of production. We link establishment-level data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey with productivity data from the Census Bureau's manufacturing surveys. Our analysis reveals strong relationships between establishment productivity and task, skill, and occupation inputs. These relationships are highly nonlinear and vary by industry. When we account for these patterns, we can explain a substantial share of productivity dispersion across establishments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Kids to School and Moms to Work: New York City's Universal Pre-K Expansion and Mother's Employment

    September 2025

    Authors: Laxman Timilsina

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-62

    Using the restricted data from American Community Survey from 2011 to 2017, this paper examines the impact of New York City's (NYC) expansion of universal pre-kindergarten (UPK) on labor force participation of mothers with the youngest child of 4 years of age. Starting in Fall of 2014, any child who is 4 years old and residing in NYC for the past year is eligible for UPK for the academic year, for example all children born in 2010 would qualify for the academic year 2014-15. It uses a triple-difference approach - first compare mothers in NYC with the youngest child of 4-year-olds (treated mothers) to mothers with the youngest child of 5 and 6-year-olds (control mothers) before and after the program. Next, it compares this difference with mothers living in adjacent counties in the New York Metropolitan Area (NMA) in New York to NYC. I find that the program increased mothers' labor force participation by 5 percentage points (a 7.5 percent impact) in NYC. The results are robust to various robustness checks like comparing with mothers living in all of NMA and mothers in Philadelphia.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Graduate Coverage of Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes

    September 2025

    Authors: Cody Orr

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-61

    This paper proposes a new methodology for estimating the coverage rate of the Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes data product (PSEO), both as a share of new graduates and as a share of total working-age degree holders in the United States. This paper also assesses how representative PSEO is of the broader population of college graduates across an array of institutional and individual characteristics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Owners and the Self-Employed: 33 Million (and Counting!)

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-60

    Entrepreneurs are known to be key drivers of economic growth, and the rise of online platforms and the broader 'gig economy' has led self-employment to surge in recent decades. Yet the young and small businesses associated with this activity are often absent from economic data. In this paper, we explore a novel longitudinal dataset that covers the owners of tens of millions of the smallest businesses: those without employees. We produce three new sets of statistics on the rapidly growing set of nonemployer businesses. First, we measure transitions between self-employment and wage and salary jobs. Second, we describe nonemployer business entry and exit, as well as transitions between legal form (e.g., sole proprietorship to S corporation). Finally, we link owners to their nonemployer businesses and examine the dynamics of business ownership.
    View Full Paper PDF