CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'agency'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 37

Center for Economic Studies - 37

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 35

North American Industry Classification System - 30

National Science Foundation - 29

American Community Survey - 28

Longitudinal Business Database - 28

Business Register - 26

Economic Census - 25

Social Security Administration - 25

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 24

Employer Identification Numbers - 24

Current Population Survey - 22

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 20

Research Data Center - 18

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Cornell University - 17

Service Annual Survey - 16

County Business Patterns - 15

Protected Identification Key - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Social Security Number - 14

Decennial Census - 13

Master Address File - 13

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Social Security - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 11

2010 Census - 11

Disclosure Review Board - 11

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Unemployment Insurance - 9

Administrative Records - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 8

Person Validation System - 8

Office of Management and Budget - 8

Small Business Administration - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

Company Organization Survey - 7

Employment History File - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Local Employment Dynamics - 7

American Economic Association - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

Department of Labor - 6

LEHD Program - 6

Individual Characteristics File - 6

Sloan Foundation - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

W-2 - 5

Federal Reserve System - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

National Institute on Aging - 5

Medicaid Services - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

MAFID - 4

Postal Service - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

International Trade Research Report - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Duke University - 4

MIT Press - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Business Master File - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

CATI - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Ordinary Least Squares - 4

Urban Institute - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Composite Person Record - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Census Numident - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

HHS - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

PSID - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Department of Education - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

National Research Council - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Some Other Race - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

survey - 39

data - 35

statistical - 27

respondent - 26

census bureau - 24

microdata - 22

data census - 20

report - 19

employee - 19

payroll - 18

census data - 18

datasets - 16

employed - 15

workforce - 15

record - 15

disclosure - 14

population - 14

enterprise - 14

economic census - 13

database - 13

employ - 12

confidentiality - 11

employment data - 10

employee data - 10

company - 10

coverage - 10

department - 10

revenue - 10

organizational - 10

sector - 10

economist - 10

statistician - 10

labor - 9

work census - 9

information census - 9

censuses surveys - 9

privacy - 9

longitudinal - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

quarterly - 9

federal - 9

incorporated - 9

aggregate - 9

statistical agencies - 9

irs - 8

census employment - 8

public - 8

use census - 8

expenditure - 8

policymakers - 8

census survey - 8

sale - 8

researcher - 8

information - 8

analysis - 8

establishment - 8

employment statistics - 7

research census - 7

publicly - 7

census use - 7

estimation - 7

business data - 7

surveys censuses - 7

census research - 7

market - 7

earnings - 6

2010 census - 6

assessed - 6

corporation - 6

survey data - 6

econometric - 6

establishments data - 6

reporting - 6

analyst - 6

research - 6

employer household - 6

industrial - 6

entrepreneur - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

survey income - 5

imputation - 5

state - 5

insurance - 5

enrollment - 5

trend - 5

estimating - 5

study - 5

incentive - 4

filing - 4

census 2020 - 4

acquisition - 4

finance - 4

minority - 4

pandemic - 4

job - 4

assessing - 4

impact - 4

census years - 4

occupation - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

clerical - 4

consumer - 4

ssa - 4

model - 4

matching - 4

insured - 4

macroeconomic - 4

aggregation - 4

provided census - 3

security - 3

1040 - 3

financial - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

household surveys - 3

medicaid - 3

population survey - 3

income data - 3

census responses - 3

bias - 3

hiring - 3

discrimination - 3

contract - 3

policy - 3

tax - 3

housing - 3

residential - 3

home - 3

accounting - 3

businesses census - 3

classified - 3

tenure - 3

linked census - 3

workplace - 3

employment dynamics - 3

owner - 3

ownership - 3

census business - 3

corp - 3

labor statistics - 3

proprietorship - 3

wholesale - 3

census records - 3

race census - 3

healthcare - 3

health insurance - 3

gdp - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 81


  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance, Wage Pass-Through, and Endogenous Take-Up

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-59

    This paper studies how unemployment insurance (UI) generosity affects reservation wages, re-employment wages, and benefit take-up. Using Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) data, we estimate a cross-sectional elasticity of reservation wages with respect to weekly UI benefits of 0.014. Exploiting state variation in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) intensity and the timing of federal supplements, we find that expanded benefits during COVID-19 increased reservation wages by 8'12 percent. Using CPS rotation data, we also document a 9 percent rise in re-employment wages for UI-eligible workers relative to ineligible workers. Over the same period, the UI take-up rate rose from roughly 30 to 40 percent; Probit estimates indicate that higher benefit levels, rather than changes in observables, account for this increase. A directed search model with an endogenous filing decision replicates these facts: generosity primarily operates through the extensive margin of take-up, which mutes the pass-through from benefits to wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Privacy-Protected Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-74

    This paper introduces the Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame (Gridded EIF), a novel privacy-protected dataset derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's confidential Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) microdata infrastructure. The EIF combines comprehensive administrative records and survey data on the U.S. population with high-resolution geospatial information on environmental hazards. While access to the EIF is restricted due to the confidential nature of the underlying data, the Gridded EIF offers a broader research community the opportunity to glean insights from the data while preserving confidentiality. We describe the data and privacy protection process, and offer guidance on appropriate usage, presenting practical applications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Financing, Ownership, and Performance: A Novel, Longitudinal Firm-Level Database

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-73

    The Census Bureau's Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) underpins many studies of firm-level behavior. It tracks longitudinally all employers in the nonfarm private sector but lacks information about business financing and owner characteristics. We address this shortcoming by linking LBD observations to firm-level data drawn from several large Census Bureau surveys. The resulting Longitudinal Employer, Owner, and Financing (LEOF) database contains more than 3 million observations at the firm-year level with information about start-up financing, current financing, owner demographics, ownership structure, profitability, and owner aspirations ' all linked to annual firm-level employment data since the firm hired its first employee. Using the LEOF database, we document trends in owner demographics and financing patterns and investigate how these business characteristics relate to firm-level employment outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the Basic Monthly Current Population Survey

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-02

    Response rates to the Current Population Survey (CPS) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in key population statistics. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we take two approaches. First, we use administrative data to build a non-parametric nonresponse adjustment step while leaving the calibration to population estimates unchanged. Second, we use administratively linked data in the calibration process, matching income data from the Internal Return Service and state agencies, demographic data from the Social Security Administration and the decennial census, and industry data from the Census Bureau's Business Register to both responding and nonresponding households. We use the matched data in the household nonresponse adjustment of the CPS weighting algorithm, which changes the weights of respondents to account for differential nonresponse rates among subpopulations. After running the experimental weighting algorithm, we compare estimates of the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate between the experimental weights and the production weights. Before March 2020, estimates of the labor force participation rates using the experimental weights are 0.2 percentage points higher than the original estimates, with minimal effect on unemployment rate. After March 2020, the new labor force participation rates are similar, but the unemployment rate is about 0.2 percentage points higher in some months during the height of COVID-related interviewing restrictions. These results are suggestive that if there is any nonresponse bias present in the CPS, the magnitude is comparable to the typical margin of error of the unemployment rate estimate. Additionally, the results are overall similar across demographic groups and states, as well as using alternative weighting methodology. Finally, we discuss how our estimates compare to those from earlier papers that calculate estimates of bias in key CPS labor force statistics. This paper is for research purposes only. No changes to production are being implemented at this time.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Outsourcing Dynamism

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-64

    This paper investigates the increasing importance of domestic outsourcing in U.S. manufacturing. Under domestic outsourcing, the agency is the employer of record for temporary workers, though they perform their tasks at the client business' premises. On a yearly basis, one in two manufacturing plants hires at least some of its workers through a temporary help agency. Furthermore, domestic outsourcing is becoming increasingly more important: the average share of revenue spent on such arrangements has gone up by 85 percent since 2006. We develop a methodology to transform reported expenses on temporary and leased workers into plant-level outsourced employment counts, using administrative data on the U.S. manufacturing sector. We find that domestic outsourcing is an important margin of adjustment that plants use to modify their workforce in response to productivity shocks. Plant-level outsourced employment adjusts more quickly and is twice as responsive as payroll employment. These micro implications have significant aggregate consequences. Without taking reallocations in outsourced employment into account, the measured pace at which jobs reallocate across workplaces is underestimated. On average, we omit the equivalent of 15 percent of payroll employment reallocations in each year. However, outsourced employment churns at a much higher rate compared to its payroll counterpart. Therefore, the omission of outsourced reallocations can rationalize 37 percent of the secular decline in the aggregate job reallocation rate. Lastly, the extent of mismeasurement varies with the business cycle; falling in downturns and increasing in upturns implying that the speed of economic recovery is underestimated.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Full Report of the Comparisons of Administrative Record Rosters to Census Self-Responses and NRFU Household Member Responses

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-08

    One of the U.S. Census Bureau's innovations in the 2020 U.S. Census was the use of administrative records (AR) to create household rosters for enumerating some addresses when a self response was not available but high-quality ARs were. The goal was to reduce the cost of fieldwork during the Nonresponse Followup operation (NRFU). The original plan had NRFU beginning in mid-May and continuing through late July 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced the delay of NRFU and caused the Internal Revenue Service to postpone the income tax filing deadline, resulting in an interruption in the delivery of ARs to the U.S. Census Bureau. The delays were not anticipated when U.S. Census Bureau staff conducted the research on AR enumeration with the 2010 Census data in preparation for the 2020 Census or during the fine tuning of plans for using ARs during the 2018 End-to-End Census Test. These circumstances raised questions about whether the quality of the AR household rosters was high enough for use in enumeration. To aid in investigating the concern about the quality of the AR rosters, our analyses compared AR rosters to self-response rosters and NRFU household member responses at addresses where both ARs and a self-response were available.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-54

    We study Executive Order 11246, an employment-based affirmative action policy tar geted at firms holding contracts with the federal government. We find this policy to be in effective in the 21st century, contrary to the positive effects found in the late 1900s (Miller, 2017). Our novel dataset combines data on federal contract acquisition and enforcement with US linked employer-employee Census data 2000'2014. We employ an event study around firms' acquiring a contract, based on Miller (2017), and find the policy had no ef fect on employment shares or on hiring, for any minority group. Next, we isolate the impact of the affirmative action plan, which is EO 11246's preeminent requirement that applies to firms with contracts over $50,000. Leveraging variation from this threshold in an event study and regression discontinuity design, we find similarly null effects. Last, we show that even randomized audits are not effective, suggesting weak enforcement. Our results highlight the importance of the recent budget increase for the enforcement agency, as well as recent policies enacted to improve compliance
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparing the 2019 American Housing Survey to Contemporary Sources of Property Tax Records: Implications for Survey Efficiency and Quality

    June 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-22

    Given rising nonresponse rates and concerns about respondent burden, government statistical agencies have been exploring ways to supplement household survey data collection with administrative records and other sources of third-party data. This paper evaluates the potential of property tax assessment records to improve housing surveys by comparing these records to responses from the 2019 American Housing Survey. Leveraging the U.S. Census Bureau's linkage infrastructure, we compute the fraction of AHS housing units that could be matched to a unique property parcel (coverage rate), as well as the extent to which survey and property tax data contain the same information (agreement rate). We analyze heterogeneity in coverage and agreement across states, housing characteristics, and 11 AHS items of interest to housing researchers. Our results suggest that partial replacement of AHS data with property data, targeted toward certain survey items or single-family detached homes, could reduce respondent burden without altering data quality. Further research into partial-replacement designs is needed and should proceed on an item-by-item basis. Our work can guide this research as well as those who wish to conduct independent research with property tax records that is representative of the U.S. housing stock.
    View Full Paper PDF