CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'agency'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 40

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 39

Center for Economic Studies - 39

North American Industry Classification System - 34

Longitudinal Business Database - 31

American Community Survey - 30

National Science Foundation - 29

Social Security Administration - 28

Employer Identification Numbers - 27

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 27

Business Register - 27

Economic Census - 26

Current Population Survey - 25

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 23

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Protected Identification Key - 17

Cornell University - 17

County Business Patterns - 16

Service Annual Survey - 16

Decennial Census - 15

Master Address File - 15

Social Security Number - 15

Standard Industrial Classification - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 14

Business Dynamics Statistics - 14

Disclosure Review Board - 14

Social Security - 14

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 14

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

2010 Census - 13

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 12

Longitudinal Research Database - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 11

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 11

Office of Management and Budget - 10

Person Validation System - 10

Unemployment Insurance - 10

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Small Business Administration - 9

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Company Organization Survey - 8

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Employer Characteristics File - 8

Employment History File - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Administrative Records - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

Federal Reserve Bank - 7

Department of Labor - 7

Bureau of Labor - 7

American Economic Association - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

Annual Business Survey - 6

Medicaid Services - 6

Indian Health Service - 6

Population Estimates Program - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Ordinary Least Squares - 6

LEHD Program - 6

Individual Characteristics File - 6

Sloan Foundation - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 5

Business Employment Dynamics - 5

University of Maryland - 5

Duke University - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 5

MAFID - 5

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Securities and Exchange Commission - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

W-2 - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

National Bureau of Economic Research - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

National Institute on Aging - 5

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Census Numident - 4

Some Other Race - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

MAF-ARF - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

COVID-19 - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Postal Service - 4

Census Bureau Master Address File - 4

International Trade Research Report - 4

Retail Trade - 4

MIT Press - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Business Master File - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

CATI - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Urban Institute - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Census Household Composition Key - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Technical Services - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Social and Economic Supplement - 3

COVID - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

LODES - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Indian Housing Information Center - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

HHS - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

PSID - 3

Federal Statistical System - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 3

Department of Education - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

National Research Council - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Census 2000 - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

survey - 41

data - 35

respondent - 28

statistical - 28

census bureau - 25

microdata - 22

employee - 21

data census - 21

payroll - 19

census data - 19

report - 19

employed - 17

workforce - 17

population - 17

record - 16

enterprise - 16

datasets - 16

disclosure - 14

employ - 13

economic census - 13

database - 13

organizational - 12

labor - 11

coverage - 11

quarterly - 11

sector - 11

federal - 11

economist - 11

statistician - 11

confidentiality - 11

aggregate - 10

census employment - 10

incorporated - 10

longitudinal - 10

employment data - 10

employee data - 10

company - 10

department - 10

revenue - 10

use census - 9

establishment - 9

analysis - 9

researcher - 9

census survey - 9

work census - 9

information census - 9

censuses surveys - 9

privacy - 9

recession - 9

worker - 9

statistical agencies - 9

estimation - 8

census research - 8

census use - 8

market - 8

employment statistics - 8

irs - 8

public - 8

expenditure - 8

policymakers - 8

sale - 8

information - 8

2010 census - 7

estimating - 7

assessed - 7

establishments data - 7

earnings - 7

research - 7

research census - 7

publicly - 7

business data - 7

surveys censuses - 7

imputation - 6

enrollment - 6

trend - 6

study - 6

corporation - 6

survey data - 6

econometric - 6

reporting - 6

analyst - 6

employer household - 6

industrial - 6

minority - 5

entrepreneur - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

survey income - 5

state - 5

insurance - 5

discrimination - 4

census business - 4

unemployment rates - 4

census records - 4

census responses - 4

corporate - 4

labor statistics - 4

bias - 4

hiring - 4

incentive - 4

filing - 4

census 2020 - 4

acquisition - 4

finance - 4

pandemic - 4

job - 4

assessing - 4

impact - 4

census years - 4

occupation - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

clerical - 4

consumer - 4

ssa - 4

model - 4

matching - 4

insured - 4

macroeconomic - 4

aggregation - 4

mandate - 3

census disclosure - 3

records census - 3

sampling - 3

marketing - 3

state employment - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

unemployed - 3

individuals census - 3

provided census - 3

security - 3

1040 - 3

financial - 3

entrepreneurship - 3

household surveys - 3

medicaid - 3

population survey - 3

income data - 3

contract - 3

policy - 3

tax - 3

housing - 3

residential - 3

home - 3

accounting - 3

businesses census - 3

classified - 3

tenure - 3

linked census - 3

workplace - 3

employment dynamics - 3

owner - 3

ownership - 3

corp - 3

proprietorship - 3

wholesale - 3

race census - 3

healthcare - 3

health insurance - 3

gdp - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 87


  • Working Paper

    What Happens to Contractors After States Ban Affirmative Action?

    July 2026

    Authors: Benjamin V. Rosa

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-41

    Using restricted Census business records, I explore how banning affirmative action in state contracting affects minority- and women-owned business enterprises (MWBEs). I find that ending affirmative action led MWBE contractors to gradually downsize, with the most pronounced reductions in force experienced by Black-owned businesses and larger MWBEs. Despite these workforce changes, existing MWBEs were no more likely to shut down than other businesses. New MWBEs were relatively less common after a state's ban, highlighting how bans can shift the demographic composition of new contractors. A calibrated model suggests bans are equivalent to considerable reductions in MWBE productivity and scrap values.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Experimental Capture/recapture Estimation Using Census and Administrative Data

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-38

    This report expands upon the innovation of utilizing administrative records and third-party data implemented in the 2020 Census. The 2020 Census used administrative records and third-party data in address canvassing and nonresponse followup operations. The Census Bureau also has a long history of using administrative records of births, deaths, and other information to produce Demographic Analysis coverage estimates. Since 1980, the Census Bureau has produced capture-recapture coverage estimates by conducting an independent post-enumeration survey and utilizing dual system estimation approaches. This report presents the research results of attempting to see if administrative records and third-party data could be utilized to produce capture-recapture coverage estimates. This work uses an Expectation Maximization Log Linear Modeling approach previously researched by Statistics Netherlands and Statistics New Zealand. This report documents some of the experimental results from an evaluation that was part of the 2020 Census Program for Evaluation, Experiments, and Assessments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    New U.S. Business Establishments: Surging or Stalling?

    June 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-36

    Since the 1990s, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has reported much more rapid growth in U.S. private sector employer establishments than has the Census Bureau' the gap reached roughly 1.6 million by 2023. Using linked BLS-Census microdata, we document two main drivers. First, a large and growing number of employers providing services to the elderly and persons with disabilities are in scope for the BLS frame but not the Census Bureau's. Second, many firms appear with substantially more establishments in the BLS frame. These discrepancies substantially affect the measured establishment size distribution and quantitative policy analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Microstructure of AI Diffusion: Evidence From Firms, Business Functions, and Worker Tasks

    April 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-25

    Using novel, nationally representative data from the 2026 AI supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS), we characterize AI diffusion across three interconnected layers: overall firm use, deployment across business functions, and worker-task use. This multi-layered approach provides a nuanced picture of business AI adoption. During the supplement reference period (Nov 2025-Jan 2026), 18% of firms used AI in a business function, rising to 32% on an employment-weighted basis; adoption is expected to reach 22% within six months. AI use is substantially higher in large firms and knowledge-intensive sectors, with use rates reaching 50%-60% (60%-70%, employment-weighted) for very large firms in the Information, Professional Services, and Finance sectors. Among adopting firms, the scope of use remains limited: 57% of users integrate AI in three or fewer business functions, most commonly Sales and Marketing (52%), Strategy and Business Development (45%), and IT (41%). In 23% (41%, employment-weighted) of firms, workers use AI in work-related tasks. Writing, document analysis, and information search are the leading Generative AI use in tasks, though 65% of firms limit use to three or fewer tasks. The evidence points to both top-down and bottom-up diffusion channels: worker task use sometimes occurs without formal firm-level adoption, and firm-level adoption sometimes occurs without worker task use. Most users (66%) rely on AI solely to augment tasks, while AI-related employment decreases are rare, occurring in only 2% of firms. Regression analysis shows a robust positive correlation between firm commercial performance and the breadth of AI integration, including functional deployment, task-level use, and operational investment. A distinct divergence emerges, however, with respect to labor outcomes. Functional breadth and operational investment are positively associated with employment decreases, whereas worker-task integration shows no significant link to headcount reduction once functional integration and operational investment are taken into account.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance Extensions, Labor Market Concentration, and Match Quality

    April 2026

    Authors: David N. Wasser

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-24

    I investigate whether the effects of UI extensions are different for workers exposed to higher levels of local labor market concentration, a potential source of employer market power. I exploit measurement error in state unemployment rates that led to quasi-random assignment of UI durations in the U.S. during the Great Recession. Using matched employer-employee data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, I find that UI extensions lengthen nonemployment durations by one week and cause economically meaningful but not statistically significant increases in earnings. The UI-earnings effect is significantly lower at higher levels of concentration, while there is no difference in the UI-duration effect. The lower UI-earnings effect is driven by the extremes of the distribution of concentration. My results suggest that match improvements from UI are attenuated at higher levels of concentration.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Integrating Multiple U.S. Census Bureau Data Assets to Create Standardized Profiles of Program Participants

    January 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-01

    The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Evidence Act) directed federal agencies to systematically use data when making policy decisions. In response, the U.S. Census Bureau established the Evidence Group within its Center for Economic Studies (CES). With an interdisciplinary team of economists, sociologists, and statisticians, the Evidence Group can support the broader federal government in their efforts to use existing data to improve program operations without increasing respondent burden. For federal agencies administering social safety net and business assistance programs in particular, the team provides a no-cost evidence-building service that links program records to Census Bureau data assets and creates a series of standardized tables describing participants, their economic outcomes prior to program entry, and the communities where they live. These tables provide partner agencies with the detailed information they need to better understand their participants and potentially make their programs more accountable and effective in reaching their target populations. In this working paper, we describe the standardized tables themselves as well as the data assets available at the Census Bureau to create these tables, the data files produced by the table production process, and the methodology used to merge and harmonize data on participants and subsequently calculate unbiased and accurate estimates. We conclude with a brief discussion of steps taken to ensure confidentiality and data security. This documentation is intended to facilitate proper use and understanding of the standardized tables by partner agencies as well as researchers who are interested in leveraging these tools to explore characteristics of their samples of interest.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Unemployment Insurance, Wage Pass-Through, and Endogenous Take-Up

    September 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-59

    This paper studies how unemployment insurance (UI) generosity affects reservation wages, re-employment wages, and benefit take-up. Using Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) data, we estimate a cross-sectional elasticity of reservation wages with respect to weekly UI benefits of 0.014. Exploiting state variation in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) intensity and the timing of federal supplements, we find that expanded benefits during COVID-19 increased reservation wages by 8'12 percent. Using CPS rotation data, we also document a 9 percent rise in re-employment wages for UI-eligible workers relative to ineligible workers. Over the same period, the UI take-up rate rose from roughly 30 to 40 percent; Probit estimates indicate that higher benefit levels, rather than changes in observables, account for this increase. A directed search model with an endogenous filing decision replicates these facts: generosity primarily operates through the extensive margin of take-up, which mutes the pass-through from benefits to wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Privacy-Protected Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-74

    This paper introduces the Gridded Environmental Impacts Frame (Gridded EIF), a novel privacy-protected dataset derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's confidential Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF) microdata infrastructure. The EIF combines comprehensive administrative records and survey data on the U.S. population with high-resolution geospatial information on environmental hazards. While access to the EIF is restricted due to the confidential nature of the underlying data, the Gridded EIF offers a broader research community the opportunity to glean insights from the data while preserving confidentiality. We describe the data and privacy protection process, and offer guidance on appropriate usage, presenting practical applications.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Financing, Ownership, and Performance: A Novel, Longitudinal Firm-Level Database

    December 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-73

    The Census Bureau's Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) underpins many studies of firm-level behavior. It tracks longitudinally all employers in the nonfarm private sector but lacks information about business financing and owner characteristics. We address this shortcoming by linking LBD observations to firm-level data drawn from several large Census Bureau surveys. The resulting Longitudinal Employer, Owner, and Financing (LEOF) database contains more than 3 million observations at the firm-year level with information about start-up financing, current financing, owner demographics, ownership structure, profitability, and owner aspirations ' all linked to annual firm-level employment data since the firm hired its first employee. Using the LEOF database, we document trends in owner demographics and financing patterns and investigate how these business characteristics relate to firm-level employment outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF