CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'estimating'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 59

Ordinary Least Squares - 49

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 47

National Science Foundation - 47

North American Industry Classification System - 44

Longitudinal Research Database - 42

Total Factor Productivity - 36

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 35

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 35

Current Population Survey - 33

Longitudinal Business Database - 32

Standard Industrial Classification - 32

Census of Manufactures - 29

Internal Revenue Service - 27

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 25

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 22

American Community Survey - 22

National Bureau of Economic Research - 21

Cobb-Douglas - 20

Federal Reserve Bank - 20

Economic Census - 20

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 20

Disclosure Review Board - 19

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 18

Protected Identification Key - 18

Social Security Administration - 18

Decennial Census - 16

Employer Identification Numbers - 16

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 16

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 16

Research Data Center - 15

Special Sworn Status - 15

Cornell University - 15

Social Security Number - 15

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 13

Business Register - 13

Social Security - 12

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

Department of Economics - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

Census Bureau Business Register - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 10

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Generalized Method of Moments - 9

Energy Information Administration - 8

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

2010 Census - 8

Business Dynamics Statistics - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Indian Health Service - 6

Duke University - 6

Person Validation System - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Master Address File - 6

Housing and Urban Development - 6

LEHD Program - 6

Department of Labor - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

European Union - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

PAOC - 6

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

Detailed Earnings Records - 5

AKM - 5

MIT Press - 5

W-2 - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 5

CDF - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

New England County Metropolitan - 5

COVID-19 - 4

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

1940 Census - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Columbia University - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

TFPR - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPQ - 4

Retail Trade - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Employment History File - 4

New York University - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

IQR - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

University of Michigan - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

ASEC - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Census Numident - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 3

Department of Energy - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Postal Service - 3

Department of Health and Human Services - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

IZA - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Board of Governors - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Harvard University - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

PSID - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

estimation - 70

econometric - 62

expenditure - 44

production - 44

growth - 39

economist - 38

survey - 31

statistical - 30

earnings - 29

demand - 29

investment - 25

employ - 25

labor - 25

regression - 25

manufacturing - 25

macroeconomic - 25

estimator - 24

recession - 24

data - 22

respondent - 22

market - 22

gdp - 21

employed - 21

efficiency - 20

produce - 20

industrial - 19

revenue - 19

endogeneity - 18

aggregate - 18

census bureau - 18

sale - 17

sector - 15

workforce - 15

imputation - 14

payroll - 14

population - 14

consumption - 13

quarterly - 13

estimates production - 13

data census - 13

productivity growth - 13

productive - 13

economically - 12

productivity measures - 12

depreciation - 12

technological - 11

unobserved - 11

datasets - 11

salary - 11

trend - 11

spillover - 10

report - 10

state - 10

census data - 10

microdata - 10

analysis - 10

housing - 10

employee - 10

econometrician - 10

industry productivity - 10

plant productivity - 10

cost - 10

longitudinal - 10

employment growth - 10

innovation - 9

disclosure - 9

emission - 9

percentile - 9

use census - 9

resident - 9

econometrically - 9

regulation - 9

metropolitan - 9

neighborhood - 9

productivity plants - 9

inference - 9

measures productivity - 9

technology - 9

estimates employment - 8

regress - 8

assessed - 8

bias - 8

regressing - 8

statistician - 8

poverty - 8

average - 8

census employment - 8

efficient - 8

empirical - 8

impact - 8

estimates productivity - 8

energy - 7

epa - 7

record - 7

sampling - 7

incentive - 7

autoregressive - 7

socioeconomic - 7

employment dynamics - 7

census research - 7

residential - 7

job - 7

worker - 7

aggregation - 7

establishment - 7

factory - 7

research census - 7

inventory - 6

electricity - 6

country - 6

exogeneity - 6

indicator - 6

economic census - 6

residence - 6

analyst - 6

entrepreneur - 6

entrepreneurship - 6

enterprise - 6

utilization - 6

elasticity - 6

productivity dispersion - 6

productivity estimates - 6

industries estimate - 6

imputation model - 6

finance - 6

endogenous - 6

growth productivity - 6

productivity dynamics - 6

aging - 6

spending - 6

merger - 6

regulatory - 6

pollution - 6

environmental - 6

profit - 6

analysis productivity - 6

rates productivity - 6

specialization - 5

subsidy - 5

fuel - 5

employment estimates - 5

survey income - 5

assessing - 5

household surveys - 5

company - 5

rural - 5

regional - 5

privacy - 5

earn - 5

yearly - 5

quantity - 5

agency - 5

imputed - 5

wage data - 5

survey data - 5

factor productivity - 5

employer household - 5

census years - 5

model - 5

budget - 5

layoff - 5

regulated - 5

environmental regulation - 5

pollutant - 5

abatement expenditures - 5

pollution abatement - 5

capital - 5

technical - 5

regulation productivity - 5

patent - 4

federal - 4

matching - 4

linkage - 4

policy - 4

income survey - 4

citizen - 4

city - 4

earner - 4

rent - 4

employment statistics - 4

ethnicity - 4

forecast - 4

research - 4

turnover - 4

refinery - 4

renewable - 4

researcher - 4

observed productivity - 4

geographically - 4

productivity shocks - 4

confidentiality - 4

monopolistic - 4

competitor - 4

sample - 4

disadvantaged - 4

hiring - 4

unemployed - 4

proprietorship - 4

wage changes - 4

consumer - 4

firm dynamics - 4

inflation - 4

heterogeneity - 4

area - 4

geographic - 4

productivity size - 4

entrepreneurial - 4

development - 4

employment changes - 4

employee data - 4

workforce indicators - 4

tax - 4

coverage - 4

costs pollution - 4

tenure - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

labor productivity - 4

investment productivity - 4

employment wages - 4

labor statistics - 4

polluting - 4

profitability - 4

workplace - 4

productivity impacts - 4

patenting - 3

externality - 3

census survey - 3

census records - 3

irs - 3

census responses - 3

urban - 3

locality - 3

relocation - 3

income data - 3

venture - 3

classified - 3

industrial classification - 3

classification - 3

rate - 3

utility - 3

incorporated - 3

regional economic - 3

larger firms - 3

tariff - 3

distribution - 3

energy efficiency - 3

gain - 3

yield - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

wage regressions - 3

medicaid - 3

prevalence - 3

price - 3

department - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

census use - 3

startup - 3

declining - 3

mobility - 3

region - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

regressors - 3

product - 3

pricing - 3

investing - 3

insurance - 3

enrollment - 3

employment data - 3

employment count - 3

acquisition - 3

financial - 3

household income - 3

employment flows - 3

population survey - 3

ssa - 3

compensation - 3

district - 3

substitute - 3

productivity differences - 3

plants industry - 3

plant investment - 3

employing - 3

productivity analysis - 3

industry growth - 3

manufacturer - 3

performance - 3

plant - 3

textile - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 162


  • Working Paper

    The Geography of Inventors and Local Knowledge Spillovers in R&D

    October 2024

    Authors: Brian C. Fujiy

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-59

    I causally estimate local knowledge spillovers in R&D and quantify their importance when implementing R&D policies. Using a new administrative panel on German inventors, I estimate these spillovers by isolating quasi-exogenous variation from the arrival of East German inventors across West Germany after the Reunification of Germany in 1990. Increasing the number of inventors by 1% increases inventor productivity by 0.4%. I build a spatial model of innovation, and show that these spillovers are crucial when reducing migration costs for inventors or implementing R&D subsidies to promote economic activity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Empirical Distribution of the Plant-Level Components of Energy and Carbon Intensity at the Six-digit NAICS Level Using a Modified KAYA Identity

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-46

    Three basic pillars of industry-level decarbonization are energy efficiency, decarbonization of energy sources, and electrification. This paper provides estimates of a decomposition of these three components of carbon emissions by industry: energy intensity, carbon intensity of energy, and energy (fuel) mix. These estimates are constructed at the six-digit NAICS level from non-public, plant-level data collected by the Census Bureau. Four quintiles of the distribution of each of the three components are constructed, using multiple imputation (MI) to deal with non-reported energy variables in the Census data. MI allows the estimates to avoid non-reporting bias. MI also allows more six-digit NAICS to be estimated under Census non-disclosure rules, since dropping non-reported observations may have reduced the sample sizes unnecessarily. The estimates show wide variation in each of these three components of emissions (intensity) and provide a first empirical look into the plant-level variation that underlies carbon emissions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expanding the Frontier of Economic Statistics Using Big Data: A Case Study of Regional Employment

    July 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-37

    Big data offers potentially enormous benefits for improving economic measurement, but it also presents challenges (e.g., lack of representativeness and instability), implying that their value is not always clear. We propose a framework for quantifying the usefulness of these data sources for specific applications, relative to existing official sources. We specifically weigh the potential benefits of additional granularity and timeliness, while examining the accuracy associated with any new or improved estimates, relative to comparable accuracy produced in existing official statistics. We apply the methodology to employment estimates using data from a payroll processor, considering both the improvement of existing state-level estimates, but also the production of new, more timely, county-level estimates. We find that incorporating payroll data can improve existing state-level estimates by 11% based on out-of-sample mean absolute error, although the improvement is considerably higher for smaller state-industry cells. We also produce new county-level estimates that could provide more timely granular estimates than previously available. We develop a novel test to determine if these new county-level estimates have errors consistent with official series. Given the level of granularity, we cannot reject the hypothesis that the new county estimates have an accuracy in line with official measures, implying an expansion of the existing frontier. We demonstrate the practical importance of these experimental estimates by investigating a hypothetical application during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period in which more timely and granular information could have assisted in implementing effective policies. Relative to existing estimates, we find that the alternative payroll data series could help identify areas of the country where employment was lagging. Moreover, we also demonstrate the value of a more timely series.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gradient Boosting to Address Statistical Problems Arising from Non-Linkage of Census Bureau Datasets

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-27

    This article introduces the twangRDC package, which contains functions to address non-linkage in US Census Bureau datasets. The Census Bureau's Person Identification Validation System facilitates data linkage by assigning unique person identifiers to federal, third party, decennial census, and survey data. Not all records in these datasets can be linked to the reference file and as such not all records will be assigned an identifier. This article is a tutorial for using the twangRDC to generate nonresponse weights to account for non-linkage of person records across US Census Bureau datasets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Icing on the Cake: The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Income Data Quality in the SIPP

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-03

    Accurate measurement of key income variables plays a crucial role in economic research and policy decision-making. However, the presence of item nonresponse and measurement error in survey data can cause biased estimates. These biases can subsequently lead to sub-optimal policy decisions and inefficient allocation of resources. While there have been various studies documenting item nonresponse and measurement error in economic data, there have not been many studies investigating interventions that could reduce item nonresponse and measurement error. In our research, we investigate the impact of monetary incentives on reducing item nonresponse and measurement error for labor and investment income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Our study utilizes a randomized incentive experiment in Waves 1 and 2 of the 2014 SIPP, which allows us to assess the effectiveness of incentives in reducing item nonresponse and measurement error. We find that households receiving incentives had item nonresponse rates that are 1.3 percentage points lower for earnings and 1.5 percentage points lower for Social Security income. Measurement error was 6.31 percentage points lower at the intensive margin for interest income, and 16.48 percentage points lower for dividend income compared to non-incentive recipient households. These findings provide valuable insights for data producers and users and highlight the importance of implementing strategies to improve data quality in economic research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63

    Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Economic Geography of Lifecycle Human Capital Accumulation: The Competing Effects of Labor Markets and Childhood Environments

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-54

    We examine how place shapes the production of human capital across the lifecycle. We ask: do those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood also have local labor markets that do so in adulthood? We begin by modeling wages across place as driven by 1) location-specific wage premiums, 2) adult human capital accumulation due to local labor market exposure, and 3) childhood human capital accumulation. We construct estimates of location wage premiums using AKM style estimates of movers across US commuting zones and validate these estimates using evidence from plausibly exogenous out migration from New Orleans in response to Hurricane Katrina. Next, we examine differential earnings trajectories among movers to construct estimates of human capital accumulation due to labor market exposure. We validate these estimates using wage changes of multi-time movers. Finally, we estimate the impact of place on childhood human capital production using age variation in moves during childhood. Crucially, our estimates of location wage premiums and adult human capital accumulation allow us to construct estimates of the causal effect of place during childhood that are not confounded by correlated labor market exposure. Using these estimates, we show there is a tradeoff between those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood and the local labor markets that do so in adulthood. We find that each 1-rank increase in earnings due to adult labor market exposure trades off with a 0.43 rank decrease in earnings due to the local childhood environment. This pattern is closely linked to city size, as adult human capital accumulation generally increases with city size, while childhood human capital accumulation falls. These divergent trajectories are associated with differences in both the physical structure of cities and the nature of social interaction therein. There is no tradeoff present in the largest cities, which provide greater exposure to high-wage earners and higher levels of local investment. Finally, we examine how these patterns are reflected in local rents. Location wage premia are heavily capitalized into rents, but the determinants of lifecycle human capital accumulation are not.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Mixed-Effects Methods For Search and Matching Research

    September 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-43

    We study mixed-effects methods for estimating equations containing person and firm effects. In economics such models are usually estimated using fixed-effects methods. Recent enhancements to those fixed-effects methods include corrections to the bias in estimating the covariance matrix of the person and firm effects, which we also consider.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Noncitizen Coverage and Its Effects on U.S. Population Statistics

    August 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-42

    We produce population estimates with the same reference date, April 1, 2020, as the 2020 Census of Population and Housing by combining 31 types of administrative record (AR) and third-party sources, including several new to the Census Bureau with a focus on noncitizens. Our AR census national population estimate is higher than other Census Bureau official estimates: 1.8% greater than the 2020 Demographic Analysis high estimate, 3.0% more than the 2020 Census count, and 3.6% higher than the vintage-2020 Population Estimates Program estimate. Our analysis suggests that inclusion of more noncitizens, especially those with unknown legal status, explains the higher AR census estimate. About 19.8% of AR census noncitizens have addresses that cannot be linked to an address in the 2020 Census collection universe, compared to 5.7% of citizens, raising the possibility that the 2020 Census did not collect data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing in the United States under the residency criteria used for the census. We show differences in estimates by age, sex, Hispanic origin, geography, and socioeconomic characteristics symptomatic of the differences in noncitizen coverage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Unionization, Employer Opposition, and Establishment Closure

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-35

    We study the effect of private-sector unionization on establishment employment and survival. Specifically, we analyze National Labor Relations Board union elections from 1981'2005 using administrative Census data. Our empirical strategy extends standard difference-in-differences techniques with regression discontinuity extrapolation methods. This allows us to avoid biases from only comparing close elections and to estimate treatment effects that include larger marginof- victory elections. Using this strategy, we show that unionization decreases an establishment's employment and likelihood of survival, particularly in manufacturing and other blue-collar and industrial sectors. We hypothesize that two reasons for these effects are firms' ability to avoid working with new unions and employers' opposition to unions. We find that the negative effects are significantly larger for elections at multi-establishment firms. Additionally, after a successful union election at one establishment, employment increases at the firms' other establishments. Both pieces of evidence are consistent with firms avoiding new unions by shifting production from unionized establishments to other establishments. Finally, we find larger declines in employment and survival following elections where managers or owners were likely more opposed to the union. This evidence supports new reasons for the negative effects of unionization we document.
    View Full Paper PDF