CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Keywords(s): 'efficiency'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 41

Center for Economic Studies - 36

Total Factor Productivity - 35

Longitudinal Research Database - 35

Census of Manufactures - 30

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 26

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 25

Ordinary Least Squares - 22

Standard Industrial Classification - 20

National Science Foundation - 20

North American Industry Classification System - 17

Longitudinal Business Database - 17

National Bureau of Economic Research - 17

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 15

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 14

Special Sworn Status - 14

Cobb-Douglas - 14

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 12

Economic Census - 11

Energy Information Administration - 10

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 10

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 10

TFPQ - 9

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 8

Current Population Survey - 8

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Research Data Center - 7

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 7

Internal Revenue Service - 7

PAOC - 7

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 6

TFPR - 6

Department of Economics - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Duke University - 5

Disclosure Review Board - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 5

Federal Reserve Bank - 4

European Union - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

Census Bureau Business Register - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Business Register - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

University of Maryland - 3

American Economic Association - 3

Fabricated Metal Products - 3

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

CAAA - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

World Bank - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

Schools Under Registration Review - 3

production - 58

expenditure - 37

produce - 37

econometric - 33

manufacturing - 32

growth - 31

demand - 23

industrial - 23

revenue - 21

estimating - 20

efficient - 20

investment - 20

profit - 19

productive - 18

sector - 18

emission - 17

epa - 16

economically - 16

regulation - 16

consumption - 15

plant productivity - 15

depreciation - 15

market - 14

productivity growth - 14

profitability - 14

economist - 13

fuel - 12

electricity - 12

energy - 12

regulatory - 12

labor - 12

sale - 12

gdp - 11

industry productivity - 11

pollution - 11

macroeconomic - 10

productivity dispersion - 10

cost - 10

innovation - 10

environmental - 10

pollutant - 10

refinery - 9

regression - 9

productivity plants - 9

earnings - 9

company - 9

polluting - 9

technological - 9

regulated - 8

energy efficiency - 8

regulation productivity - 8

growth productivity - 8

analysis productivity - 8

estimation - 8

producing - 8

factor productivity - 8

factory - 8

organizational - 8

productivity measures - 7

econometrically - 7

firms productivity - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

plants industry - 7

profitable - 7

technology - 7

incentive - 6

renewable - 6

pricing - 6

energy prices - 6

employ - 6

employed - 6

measures productivity - 6

aggregate productivity - 6

manufacturer - 6

enterprise - 6

competitor - 6

development - 6

merger - 6

acquisition - 6

pollution abatement - 6

environmental regulation - 6

advantage - 6

specialization - 6

investing - 6

utility - 5

productivity differences - 5

gain - 5

yield - 5

manager - 5

management - 5

recession - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

productivity firms - 5

accounting - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity analysis - 5

rates productivity - 5

manufacturing plants - 5

estimates production - 5

plant - 5

utilization - 4

aggregate - 4

employee - 4

establishment - 4

workforce - 4

estimator - 4

labor productivity - 4

estimates productivity - 4

monopolistic - 4

externality - 4

pollution regulation - 4

spillover - 4

quantity - 4

agriculture - 4

heterogeneity - 4

observed productivity - 4

budget - 3

saving - 3

exogeneity - 3

electricity prices - 3

payroll - 3

worker - 3

agricultural - 3

export - 3

managerial - 3

exporting - 3

exporter - 3

quarterly - 3

strategic - 3

declining - 3

inventory - 3

expense - 3

productivity increases - 3

inflation - 3

acquirer - 3

consumer - 3

price - 3

plant employment - 3

regional - 3

metropolitan - 3

polluting industries - 3

commodity - 3

leverage - 3

industry output - 3

investment productivity - 3

plant investment - 3

invest - 3

diversification - 3

capital - 3

spending - 3

asset - 3

plants industries - 3

endogeneity - 3

costs pollution - 3

technical - 3

stock - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 84


  • Working Paper

    Empirical Distribution of the Plant-Level Components of Energy and Carbon Intensity at the Six-digit NAICS Level Using a Modified KAYA Identity

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-46

    Three basic pillars of industry-level decarbonization are energy efficiency, decarbonization of energy sources, and electrification. This paper provides estimates of a decomposition of these three components of carbon emissions by industry: energy intensity, carbon intensity of energy, and energy (fuel) mix. These estimates are constructed at the six-digit NAICS level from non-public, plant-level data collected by the Census Bureau. Four quintiles of the distribution of each of the three components are constructed, using multiple imputation (MI) to deal with non-reported energy variables in the Census data. MI allows the estimates to avoid non-reporting bias. MI also allows more six-digit NAICS to be estimated under Census non-disclosure rules, since dropping non-reported observations may have reduced the sample sizes unnecessarily. The estimates show wide variation in each of these three components of emissions (intensity) and provide a first empirical look into the plant-level variation that underlies carbon emissions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Industrial Opt-Out from Utility Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs

    October 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-52

    Industry accounts for one-third of energy consumption in the US. Studies suggest that energy efficiency opportunities represent a potential energy resource for regulated utilities and have resulted in rate of return regulated demand-side management (DSM) and energy efficiency (EE) programs. However, many large customers are allowed to self-direct or opt-out. In the Carolinas (NC and SC), over half of industrial and large commercial customers have selected to opt out. Although these customers claim they invest in EE improvements when it is economic and cost-effective to do so, there is no mechanism to validate whether they actually achieved energy savings. This project examines the industrial energy efficiency between the program participants and non participants in the Carolinas by utilizing the non-public Census of Manufacturing data and the public list of firms that have chosen to opt out. We compare the relative energy efficiency between the stay-in and opt-out plants. The t-test results suggest opt-out plants are less efficient. However, the opt-out decisions are not random; large plants or plants belonging to large firms are more likely to opt out, possibly because they have more information and resources. We conduct a propensity score matching method to account for factors that could affect the opt-out decisions. We find that the opt-out plants perform at least as well or slightly better than the stay-in plants. The relative performance of the opt-out firms suggest that they may not need utility program resources to obtain similar levels of efficiency from the stay-in group.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technology Lock-In and Costs of Delayed Climate Policy

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-33

    This paper studies the implications of current energy prices for future energy efficiency and climate policy. Using U.S. Census microdata and quasi-experimental variation in energy prices, we first show that manufacturing plants that open when electricity prices are low consume more energy throughout their lifetime, regardless of current electricity prices. We then estimate that a persistent bias of technological change toward energy can explain the long-term effects of entry-year electricity prices on energy intensity. Overall, this 'technology lock-in' implies that increasing entry-year electricity prices by 10% would decrease a plant's energy intensity of production by 3% throughout its lifetime.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Exploring New Ways to Classify Industries for Energy Analysis and Modeling

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-49

    Combustion, other emitting processes and fossil energy use outside the power sector have become urgent concerns given the United States' commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Industry is an important end user of energy and relies on fossil fuels used directly for process heating and as feedstocks for a diverse range of applications. Fuel and energy use by industry is heterogeneous, meaning even a single product group can vary broadly in its production routes and associated energy use. In the United States, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) serves as the standard for statistical data collection and reporting. In turn, data based on NAICS are the foundation of most United States energy modeling. Thus, the effectiveness of NAICS at representing energy use is a limiting condition for current expansive planning to improve energy efficiency and alternatives to fossil fuels in industry. Facility-level data could be used to build more detail into heterogeneous sectors and thus supplement data from Bureau of the Census and U.S Energy Information Administration reporting at NAICS code levels but are scarce. This work explores alternative classification schemes for industry based on energy use characteristics and validates an approach to estimate facility-level energy use from publicly available greenhouse gas emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The approaches in this study can facilitate understanding of current, as well as possible future, energy demand. First, current approaches to the construction of industrial taxonomies are summarized along with their usefulness for industrial energy modeling. Unsupervised machine learning techniques are then used to detect clusters in data reported from the U.S. Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Center program. Clusters of Industrial Assessment Center data show similar levels of correlation between energy use and explanatory variables as three-digit NAICS codes. Interestingly, the clusters each include a large cross section of NAICS codes, which lends additional support to the idea that NAICS may not be particularly suited for correlation between energy use and the variables studied. Fewer clusters are needed for the same level of correlation as shown in NAICS codes. Initial assessment shows a reasonable level of separation using support vector machines with higher than 80% accuracy, so machine learning approaches may be promising for further analysis. The IAC data is focused on smaller and medium-sized facilities and is biased toward higher energy users for a given facility type. Cladistics, an approach for classification developed in biology, is adapted to energy and process characteristics of industries. Cladistics applied to industrial systems seeks to understand the progression of organizations and technology as a type of evolution, wherein traits are inherited from previous systems but evolve due to the emergence of inventions and variations and a selection process driven by adaptation to pressures and favorable outcomes. A cladogram is presented for evolutionary directions in the iron and steel sector. Cladograms are a promising tool for constructing scenarios and summarizing directions of sectoral innovation. The cladogram of iron and steel is based on the drivers of energy use in the sector. Phylogenetic inference is similar to machine learning approaches as it is based on a machine-led search of the solution space, therefore avoiding some of the subjectivity of other classification systems. Our prototype approach for constructing an industry cladogram is based on process characteristics according to the innovation framework derived from Schumpeter to capture evolution in a given sector. The resulting cladogram represents a snapshot in time based on detailed study of process characteristics. This work could be an important tool for the design of scenarios for more detailed modeling. Cladograms reveal groupings of emerging or dominant processes and their implications in a way that may be helpful for policymakers and entrepreneurs, allowing them to see the larger picture, other good ideas, or competitors. Constructing a cladogram could be a good first step to analysis of many industries (e.g. nitrogenous fertilizer production, ethyl alcohol manufacturing), to understand their heterogeneity, emerging trends, and coherent groupings of related innovations. Finally, validation is performed for facility-level energy estimates from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Facility-level data availability continues to be a major challenge for industrial modeling. The method outlined by (McMillan et al. 2016; McMillan and Ruth 2019) allows estimating of facility level energy use based on mandatory greenhouse gas reporting. The validation provided here is an important step for further use of this data for industrial energy modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The U.S. Manufacturing Sector's Response to Higher Electricity Prices: Evidence from State-Level Renewable Portfolio Standards

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-47

    While several papers examine the effects of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) on electricity prices, they mainly rely on state-level data and there has been little research on how RPS policies affect manufacturing activity via their effect on electricity prices. Using plant-level data for the entire U.S. manufacturing sector and all electric utilities from 1992 ' 2015, we jointly estimate the effect of RPS adoption and stringency on plant-level electricity prices and production decisions. To ensure that our results are not sensitive to possible pre-existing differences across manufacturing plants in RPS and non-RPS states, we implement coarsened exact covariate matching. Our results suggest that electricity prices for plants in RPS states averaged about 2% higher than in non-RPS states, notably lower than prior estimates based on state-level data. In response to these higher electricity prices, we estimate that plant electricity usage declined by 1.2% for all plants and 1.8% for energy-intensive plants, broadly consistent with published estimates of the elasticity of electricity demand for industrial users. We find smaller declines in output, employment, and hours worked (relative to the decline in electricity use). Finally, several key RPS policy design features that vary substantially from state-to-state produce heterogeneous effects on plant-level electricity prices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Opening the Black Box: Task and Skill Mix and Productivity Dispersion

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-44

    An important gap in most empirical studies of establishment-level productivity is the limited information about workers' characteristics and their tasks. Skill-adjusted labor input measures have been shown to be important for aggregate productivity measurement. Moreover, the theoretical literature on differences in production technologies across businesses increasingly emphasizes the task content of production. Our ultimate objective is to open this black box of tasks and skills at the establishment-level by combining establishment-level data on occupations from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) with a restricted-access establishment-level productivity dataset created by the BLS-Census Bureau Collaborative Micro-productivity Project. We take a first step toward this objective by exploring the conceptual, specification, and measurement issues to be confronted. We provide suggestive empirical analysis of the relationship between within-industry dispersion in productivity and tasks and skills. We find that within-industry productivity dispersion is strongly positively related to within-industry task/skill dispersion.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Energy Efficiency Gap and Energy Price Responsiveness in Food Processing

    June 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-18

    This paper estimates stochastic frontier energy demand functions with non-public, plant-level data from the U.S. Census Bureau to measure the energy efficiency gap and energy price elasticities in the food processing industry. The estimates are for electricity and fuel use in 4 food processing sectors, based on the disaggregation of this industry used by the National Energy Modeling System Industrial Demand Module. The estimated demand functions control for plant inputs and output, energy prices, and other observables including 6-digit NAICS industry designations. Own price elasticities range from 0.6 to -0.9 with little evidence of fuel/electricity substitution. The magnitude of the efficiency estimates is sensitive to the assumptions but consistently reveal that few plants achieve 100% efficiency. Defining a 'practical level of energy efficiency' as the 95th percentile of the efficiency distributions and averaging across all the models result in a ~20% efficiency gap. However, most of the potential reductions in energy use from closing this efficiency gap are from plants that are 'low hanging fruit'; 13% of the 20% potential reduction in the efficiency gap can be obtained by bringing the lower half of the efficiency distribution up to just the median level of observed performance. New plants do exhibit higher energy efficiency than existing plants which is statistically significant, but the difference is small for most of the industry; ranging from a low of 0.4% to a high of 5.7%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Misallocation or Mismeasurement?

    February 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-07

    The ratio of revenue to inputs differs greatly across plants within countries such as the U.S. and India. Such gaps may reflect misallocation which hinders aggregate productivity. But differences in measured average products need not reflect differences in true marginal products. We propose a way to estimate the gaps in true marginal products in the presence of measurement error. Our method exploits how revenue growth is less sensitive to input growth when a plant's average products are overstated by measurement error. For Indian manufacturing from 1985'2013, our correction lowers potential gains from reallocation by 20%. For the U.S. the effect is even more dramatic, reducing potential gains by 60% and eliminating 2/3 of a severe downward trend in allocative efficiency over 1978'2013.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    MANAGING TRADE: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA AND THE US

    May 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-15

    We present a heterogeneous-firm model in which management ability increases both production efficiency and product quality. Combining six micro-datasets on management practices, production and trade in Chinese and American firms, we find broad support for the model's predictions. First, better managed firms are more likely to export, sell more products to more destination countries, and earn higher export revenues and profits. Second, better managed exporters have higher prices, higher quality, and lower quality-adjusted prices. Finally, they also use a wider range of inputs, higher quality and more expensive inputs, and imported inputs from more advanced countries. The structural estimates indicate that management is important for improving production efficiency and product quality in both countries, but it matters more in China than in the US, especially for product quality. Panel analysis for the US and a randomized control trial in India suggest that management exerts causal effects on product quality, production efficiency, and exports. Poor management practices may thus hinder trade and growth, especially in developing countries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dispersion in Dispersion: Measuring Establishment-Level Differences in Productivity

    April 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-25RR

    We describe new experimental productivity statistics, Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP), jointly developed and published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Census Bureau. Productivity measures are critical for understanding economic performance. Official BLS productivity statistics, which are available for major sectors and detailed industries, provide information on the sources of aggregate productivity growth. A large body of research shows that within-industry variation in productivity provides important insights into productivity dynamics. This research reveals large and persistent productivity differences across businesses even within narrowly defined industries. These differences vary across industries and over time and are related to productivity-enhancing reallocation. Dispersion in productivity across businesses can provide information about the nature of competition and frictions within sectors, and about the sources of rising wage inequality across businesses. Because there were no official statistics providing this level of detail, BLS and the Census Bureau partnered to create measures of within-industry productivity dispersion. These measures complement official BLS aggregate and industry-level productivity growth statistics and thereby improve our understanding of the rich productivity dynamics in the U.S. economy. The underlying microdata for these measures are available for use by qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center (FSRDC) network. These new statistics confirm the presence of large productivity differences and we hope that these new data products will encourage further research into understanding these differences.
    View Full Paper PDF