CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Social Security Administration'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 107

Current Population Survey - 88

American Community Survey - 84

Social Security Number - 77

Protected Identification Key - 73

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 70

Social Security - 69

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 65

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 59

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 52

Center for Economic Studies - 49

Employer Identification Numbers - 47

National Science Foundation - 45

Decennial Census - 44

Disclosure Review Board - 43

Person Validation System - 41

Longitudinal Business Database - 36

W-2 - 34

North American Industry Classification System - 32

Research Data Center - 31

2010 Census - 30

Business Register - 30

Ordinary Least Squares - 29

Census Numident - 27

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 27

Standard Industrial Classification - 27

Master Address File - 26

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 25

Personally Identifiable Information - 24

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 24

Person Identification Validation System - 24

Detailed Earnings Records - 24

PSID - 22

Service Annual Survey - 22

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 22

National Bureau of Economic Research - 21

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 20

Economic Census - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 20

Cornell University - 18

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

SSA Numident - 18

Disability Insurance - 17

Federal Reserve Bank - 17

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 17

Department of Labor - 16

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 16

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

Census Household Composition Key - 15

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 15

County Business Patterns - 15

National Institute on Aging - 15

Longitudinal Research Database - 15

Housing and Urban Development - 14

Unemployment Insurance - 14

Administrative Records - 14

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 14

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

ASEC - 13

Master Beneficiary Record - 13

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 12

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 12

National Opinion Research Center - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 12

Federal Tax Information - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

Medicaid Services - 11

Earned Income Tax Credit - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 11

Some Other Race - 11

Indian Health Service - 11

International Trade Research Report - 10

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 10

NUMIDENT - 10

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

COVID-19 - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

Master Earnings File - 10

Census of Manufactures - 10

Summary Earnings Records - 10

Adjusted Gross Income - 9

University of Michigan - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Department of Homeland Security - 9

1940 Census - 9

Local Employment Dynamics - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 8

Centers for Medicare - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Census Edited File - 8

PIKed - 8

Census Bureau Master Address File - 8

Data Management System - 8

Postal Service - 8

Federal Reserve System - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Business Master File - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

Social Security Disability Insurance - 7

MAF-ARF - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

Business Employment Dynamics - 7

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Company Organization Survey - 7

American Economic Review - 7

University of Maryland - 6

MAFID - 6

National Academy of Sciences - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Office of Personnel Management - 6

Harvard University - 6

Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Employment History File - 6

Boston College - 6

AKM - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Stern School of Business - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 6

Urban Institute - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

Stanford University - 5

Department of Agriculture - 5

Federal Register - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

National Institutes of Health - 5

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Department of Economics - 5

Yale University - 5

Department of Justice - 5

CDF - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

Employer Characteristics File - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Minnesota Population Center - 5

Journal of Political Economy - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

Board of Governors - 4

New York University - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

HHS - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Retail Trade - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

New York Times - 3

General Education Development - 3

Supreme Court - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

2SLS - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

National Health Interview Survey - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Professional Services - 3

National Research Council - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

CAAA - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Nonemployer Statistics - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

WECD - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

survey - 56

employed - 48

employ - 46

respondent - 45

population - 43

earnings - 43

labor - 37

recession - 37

workforce - 35

salary - 31

census data - 30

employee - 30

data - 28

hispanic - 26

ethnicity - 26

census bureau - 25

data census - 25

agency - 25

payroll - 24

ssa - 23

socioeconomic - 22

record - 22

worker - 22

statistical - 22

immigrant - 20

retirement - 20

poverty - 19

datasets - 19

unemployed - 19

earner - 19

resident - 18

citizen - 18

ethnic - 18

estimating - 18

intergenerational - 17

irs - 17

economist - 17

microdata - 16

enterprise - 16

report - 15

econometric - 15

family - 14

medicaid - 14

welfare - 14

federal - 14

use census - 14

earn - 14

job - 14

quarterly - 14

census survey - 13

disparity - 13

disadvantaged - 13

minority - 13

enrollment - 13

heterogeneity - 13

racial - 13

race - 13

immigration - 13

macroeconomic - 13

longitudinal - 13

economic census - 13

migrant - 12

occupation - 12

assessed - 12

revenue - 12

coverage - 12

records census - 12

1040 - 12

census employment - 12

employment statistics - 12

census research - 12

parent - 11

mobility - 11

residence - 11

survey income - 11

imputation - 11

percentile - 11

sector - 11

database - 11

statistician - 11

census records - 10

tax - 10

census responses - 10

labor statistics - 10

employment earnings - 10

matching - 10

company - 10

employee data - 10

generation - 9

residential - 9

migration - 9

incentive - 9

household surveys - 9

bias - 9

surveys censuses - 9

segregation - 9

trend - 9

entrepreneurship - 9

disclosure - 9

linked census - 9

work census - 9

workers earnings - 9

tenure - 9

establishment - 9

census file - 9

parental - 8

state - 8

sampling - 8

insurance - 8

filing - 8

pension - 8

linkage - 8

white - 8

census use - 8

wealth - 8

employment data - 8

industrial - 8

entrepreneur - 8

citizenship - 7

compensation - 7

demography - 7

aging - 7

poorer - 7

expenditure - 7

housing - 7

saving - 7

research census - 7

census household - 7

race census - 7

medicare - 7

retiree - 7

disability - 7

assessing - 7

acquisition - 7

employment wages - 7

employing - 7

proprietorship - 7

estimation - 7

merger - 7

manufacturing - 7

divorced - 6

relocation - 6

adulthood - 6

shift - 6

hire - 6

eligibility - 6

mortality - 6

cohort - 6

taxpayer - 6

income survey - 6

income data - 6

dependent - 6

gdp - 6

recessionary - 6

endogeneity - 6

hiring - 6

schooling - 6

researcher - 6

firms census - 6

information census - 6

associate - 6

discrimination - 6

department - 6

matched - 6

survey data - 6

information - 6

venture - 6

employment dynamics - 6

black - 6

earnings workers - 6

organizational - 6

earnings age - 6

yearly - 6

clerical - 6

censuses surveys - 6

aggregate - 6

proprietor - 6

sale - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

marriage - 5

adoption - 5

migrating - 5

reside - 5

benefit - 5

survey households - 5

eligible - 5

neighborhood - 5

census linked - 5

pandemic - 5

layoff - 5

mexican - 5

residing - 5

income year - 5

women earnings - 5

graduate - 5

study - 5

career - 5

2010 census - 5

discrepancy - 5

analysis - 5

employer household - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

earnings employees - 5

employment trends - 5

accounting - 5

incorporated - 5

business data - 5

census years - 5

earnings inequality - 5

fertility - 5

employment measures - 5

wage data - 5

research - 5

identifier - 5

production - 5

migrate - 4

sample - 4

prevalence - 4

population survey - 4

geographic - 4

child - 4

income children - 4

decade - 4

volatility - 4

birth - 4

impact - 4

estimator - 4

census 2020 - 4

educated - 4

regional - 4

turnover - 4

warehousing - 4

worker demographics - 4

workforce indicators - 4

employment estimates - 4

unemployment rates - 4

census business - 4

ancestry - 4

health - 4

wage earnings - 4

industry employment - 4

classified - 4

native - 4

workplace - 4

metropolitan - 4

confidentiality - 4

corporation - 4

ownership - 4

average - 4

financial - 4

growth - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

uninsured - 4

insured - 4

aggregation - 4

agriculture - 3

geographically - 3

homeowner - 3

economically - 3

declining - 3

decline - 3

immigrated - 3

latino - 3

segregated - 3

sociology - 3

income individuals - 3

income households - 3

woman - 3

recession exposure - 3

poor - 3

maternal - 3

funding - 3

employment effects - 3

labor markets - 3

social - 3

privacy - 3

public - 3

distribution - 3

bankruptcy - 3

fiscal - 3

employment count - 3

export - 3

estimates employment - 3

recession employment - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

neighbor - 3

couple - 3

wage gap - 3

effects employment - 3

wage changes - 3

earnings growth - 3

wage regressions - 3

owner - 3

business owners - 3

owned businesses - 3

produce - 3

founder - 3

enrollee - 3

statistical agencies - 3

partnership - 3

worker wages - 3

insurance employer - 3

regression - 3

employment growth - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 180


  • Working Paper

    Divorce, Family Arrangements, and Children's Adult Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-28

    Nearly a third of American children experience parental divorce before adulthood. To understand its consequences, we use linked tax and Census records for over 5 million children to examine how divorce affects family arrangements and children's long-term outcomes. Following divorce, parents move apart, household income falls, parents work longer hours, families move more frequently, and households relocate to poorer neighborhoods with less economic opportunity. This bundle of changes in family circumstances suggests multiple channels through which divorce may affect children's development and outcomes. In the years following divorce, we observe sharp increases in teen births and child mortality. To examine long-run effects on children, we compare siblings with different lengths of exposure to the same divorce. We find that parental divorce reduces children's adult earnings and college residence while increasing incarceration, mortality, and teen births. Changes in household income, neighborhood quality, and parent proximity account for 25 to 60 percent of these divorce effects.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Geographic Immobility in the United States: Assessing the Prevalence and Characteristics of Those Who Never Migrate Across State Lines Using Linked Federal Tax Microdata

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-19

    This paper explores the prevalence and characteristics of those who never migrate at the state scale in the U.S. Studying people who never migrate requires regular and frequent observation of their residential location for a lifetime, or at least for many years. A novel U.S. population-sized longitudinal dataset that links individual level Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) administrative records supplies this information annually, along with information on income and socio-demographic characteristics. We use these administrative microdata to follow a cohort aged between 15 and 50 in 2001 from 2001 to 2016, differentiating those who lived in the same state every year during this period (i.e., never made an interstate move) from those who lived in more than one state (i.e., made at least one interstate move). We find those who never made an interstate move comprised 75 percent of the total population of this age cohort. This percentage varies by year of age but never falls below 62 percent even for those who were teenagers or young adults in 2001. There are also variations in these percentages by sex, race, nativity, and income, with the latter having the largest effects. We also find substantial variation in these percentages across states. Our findings suggest a need for more research on geographically immobile populations in U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Work Organization and Cumulative Advantage

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-18

    Over decades of wage stagnation, researchers have argued that reorganizing work can boost pay for disadvantaged workers. But upgrading jobs could inadvertently shift hiring away from those workers, exacerbating their disadvantage. We theorize how work organization affects cumulative advantage in the labor market, or the extent to which high-paying positions are increasingly allocated to already-advantaged workers. Specifically, raising technical skill demands exacerbates cumulative advantage by shifting hiring towards higher-skilled applicants. In contrast, when employers increase autonomy or skills learned on-the-job, they raise wages to buy worker consent or commitment, rather than pre-existing skill. To test this idea, we match administrative earnings to task descriptions from job posts. We compare earnings for workers hired into the same occupation and firm, but under different task allocations. When employers raise complexity and autonomy, new hires' starting earnings increase and grow faster. However, while the earnings boost from complex, technical tasks shifts employment toward workers with higher prior earnings, worker selection changes less for tasks learned on-the-job and very little for high autonomy tasks. These results demonstrate how reorganizing work can interrupt cumulative advantage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Geographic Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Mortality in the US: Comparing Impacts of Place of Birth and Place of Residence

    January 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-11

    Objective: Building on the hypothesis that early-life exposures might influence the onset of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD), this study delves into geographic variations in ADRD mortality in the US. By considering both state of residence and state of birth, we aim to discern the comparative significance of these geospatial factors. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS), that has 3.5 million records from 1973-2011 and over 0.5 million deaths. We focused on individuals born in or before 1930, tracked in NLMS cohorts from 1979-2000. Employing multi-level logistic regression, with individuals nested within states of residence and/or states of birth, we assessed the role of geographical factors in ADRD mortality variation. Results: We found that both state of birth and state of residence account for a modest portion of ADRD mortality variation. Specifically, state of residence explains 1.19% of the total variation in ADRD mortality, whereas state of birth explains only 0.6%. When combined, both state of residence and state of birth account for only 1.05% of the variation, suggesting state of residence could matter more in ADRD mortality outcomes. Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that state of residence explains more variation in ADRD mortality than state of birth. These results indicate that factors in later life may present more impactful intervention points for curbing ADRD mortality. While early-life environmental exposures remain relevant, their role as primary determinants of ADRD in later life appears to be less pronounced in this study.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tip of the Iceberg: Tip Reporting at U.S. Restaurants, 2005-2018

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-68

    Tipping is a significant form of compensation for many restaurant jobs, but it is poorly measured and therefore not well understood. We combine several large administrative and survey datasets and document patterns in tip reporting that are consistent with systematic under-reporting of tip income. Our analysis indicates that although the vast majority of tipped workers do report earning some tips, the dollar value of tips is under-reported and is sensitive to reporting incentives. In total, we estimate that about eight billion in tips paid at full-service, single-location, restaurants were not captured in tax data annually over the period 2005-2018. Due to changes in payment methods and reporting incentives, tip reporting has increased over time. Our findings have implications for downstream measures dependent on accurate measures of compensation including poverty measurement among tipped restaurant workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    From Marcy to Madison Square? The Effects of Growing Up in Public Housing on Early Adulthood Outcomes

    November 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-67

    This paper studies the effects of growing up in public housing in New York City on children's long-run outcomes. Using linked administrative data, we exploit variation in the age children move into public housing to estimate the effects of spending an additional year of childhood in public housing on a range of economic and social outcomes in early adulthood. We find that childhood exposure to public housing improves labor market outcomes and reduces participation in federal safety net programs, particularly for children from the most disadvantaged families. Additionally, we find there is some heterogeneity in impacts across public housing developments. Developments located in neighborhoods with relatively fewer renters and higher household incomes are better for children overall. Our estimate of the marginal value of public funds suggests that for every $1 the government spends per child on public housing, children receive $1.40 in benefits, including $2.30 for children from the most disadvantaged families.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparison of Child Reporting in the American Community Survey and Federal Income Tax Returns Based on California Birth Records

    September 2024

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-55

    This paper takes advantage of administrative records from California, a state with a large child population and a significant historical undercount of children in Census Bureau data, dependent information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1040 records, and the American Community Survey to characterize undercounted children and compare child reporting. While IRS Form 1040 records offer potential utility for adjusting child undercounting in Census Bureau surveys, this analysis finds overlapping reporting issues among various demographic and economic groups. Specifically, older children, those of Non-Hispanic Black mothers and Hispanic mothers, children or parents with lower English proficiency, children whose mothers did not complete high school, and families with lower income-to-poverty ratio were less frequently reported in IRS 1040 records than other groups. Therefore, using IRS 1040 dependent records may have limitations for accurately representing populations with characteristics associated with the undercount of children in surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF