CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): '2010 Census'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 64

Protected Identification Key - 44

Internal Revenue Service - 37

Decennial Census - 34

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 33

Current Population Survey - 33

Social Security Number - 31

Social Security Administration - 30

Center for Economic Studies - 23

Person Validation System - 23

Master Address File - 22

Social Security - 21

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 21

North American Industry Classification System - 20

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 20

Office of Management and Budget - 20

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 19

Some Other Race - 17

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Ordinary Least Squares - 16

Administrative Records - 16

1940 Census - 15

National Science Foundation - 15

Housing and Urban Development - 15

Person Identification Validation System - 14

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

Personally Identifiable Information - 13

Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Census 2000 - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 11

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 11

SSA Numident - 11

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 11

Indian Health Service - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

MAFID - 10

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 10

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 10

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 10

Census of Manufactures - 10

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 10

Cornell University - 9

Census Edited File - 9

Economic Census - 9

National Bureau of Economic Research - 9

W-2 - 9

Employer Identification Numbers - 9

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 9

Postal Service - 9

Research Data Center - 9

Business Register - 8

Medicaid Services - 8

Census Numident - 8

Census Bureau Business Register - 8

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 8

Census Household Composition Key - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 7

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 7

American Housing Survey - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 7

United States Census Bureau - 6

County Business Patterns - 6

MAF-ARF - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

NUMIDENT - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 6

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 6

LEHD Program - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

University of Chicago - 5

University of Maryland - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Master Beneficiary Record - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

American Economic Association - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

Federal Reserve Bank - 5

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 5

Standard Industrial Classification - 5

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Federal Poverty Level - 4

Disability Insurance - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Company Organization Survey - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

United Nations - 3

Department of Economics - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

General Education Development - 3

Data Management System - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

World Bank - 3

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

PIKed - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Technical Services - 3

Harvard University - 3

CATI - 3

2SLS - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

population - 40

ethnicity - 31

hispanic - 31

respondent - 30

census data - 29

survey - 27

minority - 22

immigrant - 22

resident - 21

residence - 19

citizen - 19

ethnic - 19

census bureau - 18

data - 18

race - 18

racial - 17

census responses - 16

employed - 16

workforce - 15

neighborhood - 15

use census - 14

metropolitan - 14

immigration - 14

housing - 13

residential - 13

record - 13

white - 13

employ - 12

disparity - 12

2010 census - 12

data census - 12

migrant - 12

black - 12

statistical - 11

agency - 11

datasets - 11

segregation - 11

census records - 11

recession - 11

poverty - 10

census survey - 10

socioeconomic - 10

native - 10

labor - 10

assessed - 9

mexican - 9

latino - 9

imputation - 9

enrollment - 9

census use - 9

disadvantaged - 8

ancestry - 8

estimating - 8

migration - 8

employment data - 7

census employment - 7

census 2020 - 7

race census - 7

discrimination - 7

microdata - 7

percentile - 6

work census - 6

payroll - 6

employment statistics - 6

irs - 6

ssa - 6

medicaid - 6

expenditure - 6

census household - 6

citizenship - 6

matching - 6

analysis - 6

segregated - 6

employee - 6

records census - 6

worker - 6

production - 6

manufacturing - 6

econometric - 6

report - 5

research census - 5

provided census - 5

employed census - 5

rural - 5

geography - 5

suburb - 5

geographic - 5

intergenerational - 5

family - 5

sampling - 5

household surveys - 5

census linked - 5

heterogeneity - 5

1040 - 5

federal - 5

unemployed - 5

welfare - 5

state - 5

reside - 5

statistician - 5

enterprise - 5

entrepreneur - 5

job - 5

industrial - 5

census research - 5

censuses surveys - 4

survey households - 4

eligible - 4

coverage - 4

bias - 4

database - 4

asian - 4

indian - 4

disclosure - 4

estimator - 4

neighbor - 4

privacy - 4

residing - 4

department - 4

lending - 4

bank - 4

home - 4

venture - 4

entrepreneurship - 4

proprietor - 4

financial - 4

hiring - 4

endogeneity - 4

growth - 4

gdp - 4

proprietorship - 4

sale - 4

export - 4

wholesale - 4

economist - 4

sector - 4

commute - 4

demand - 4

census file - 4

clerical - 4

decade - 3

census disclosure - 3

urban - 3

urbanization - 3

city - 3

relocation - 3

rent - 3

renter - 3

generation - 3

adoption - 3

eligibility - 3

population survey - 3

propensity - 3

survey income - 3

earnings - 3

immigrated - 3

discriminatory - 3

linkage - 3

quarterly - 3

environmental - 3

borrower - 3

loan - 3

lender - 3

saving - 3

homeowner - 3

regression - 3

midwest - 3

finance - 3

capital - 3

hire - 3

assimilation - 3

geographically - 3

salary - 3

unemployment rates - 3

regress - 3

concentration - 3

manufacturer - 3

surveys censuses - 3

policy - 3

regional - 3

firms census - 3

tax - 3

revenue - 3

impact - 3

aggregate - 3

schooling - 3

country - 3

mobility - 3

occupation - 3

interracial - 3

layoff - 3

hurricane - 3

industrialized - 3

Viewing papers 1 through 10 of 99


  • Working Paper

    A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-57

    For the last half-century, it has been a common and accepted practice for statistical agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, to adopt different strategies to protect the confidentiality of aggregate tabular data products from those used to protect the individual records contained in publicly released microdata products. This strategy was premised on the assumption that the aggregation used to generate tabular data products made the resulting statistics inherently less disclosive than the microdata from which they were tabulated. Consistent with this common assumption, the 2010 Census of Population and Housing in the U.S. used different disclosure limitation rules for its tabular and microdata publications. This paper demonstrates that, in the context of disclosure limitation for the 2010 Census, the assumption that tabular data are inherently less disclosive than their underlying microdata is fundamentally flawed. The 2010 Census published more than 150 billion aggregate statistics in 180 table sets. Most of these tables were published at the most detailed geographic level'individual census blocks, which can have populations as small as one person. Using only 34 of the published table sets, we reconstructed microdata records including five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) from the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using only published data, an attacker using our methods can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. We further confirm, through reidentification studies, that an attacker can, within census blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with race and ethnicity different from the modal person on the census block) with 95% accuracy. Having shown the vulnerabilities inherent to the disclosure limitation methods used for the 2010 Census, we proceed to demonstrate that the more robust disclosure limitation framework used for the 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction. Finally, we show that available alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System would either fail to protect confidentiality, or would overly degrade the statistics' utility for the primary statutory use case: redrawing the boundaries of all of the nation's legislative and voting districts in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LODES Design and Methodology Report: Methodology Version 7

    August 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-52

    The purpose of this report is to document the important features of Version 7 of the LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) processing system. This includes data sources, data processing methodology, confidentiality protection methodology, some quality measures, and a high-level description of the published data. The intended audience for this document includes LODES data users, Local Employment Dynamics (LED) Partnership members, U.S. Census Bureau management, program quality auditors, and current and future research and development staff members.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Finding Suburbia in the Census

    June 2025

    Authors: Todd Gardner

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-40

    This study introduces a methodology that goes beyond the urban/rural dichotomy to classify areas into detailed settlement types: urban cores, suburbs, exurbs, outlying towns, and rural areas. Utilizing a database that provides housing unit estimates for census tracts as defined in 2010 for all decennial census years from 1940 to 2020, this research enables a longitudinal analysis of urban spatial expansion. By maintaining consistent geography across time, the methodology described in this paper emphasizes the era of development, as well as proximity to large urban centers. This broadly applicable methodology provides a framework for comparing the evolution of urban landscapes over a significant historical period, revealing trends in the transformation of territory from rural to urban, as well as associated suburbanization and exurban growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effects of Eviction on Children

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-34

    Eviction may be an important channel for the intergenerational transmission of poverty, and concerns about its effects on children are often raised as a rationale for tenant protection policies. We study how eviction impacts children's home environment, school engagement, educational achievement, and high school completion by assembling new data sets linking eviction court records in Chicago and New York to administrative public school records and restricted Census records. To disentangle the consequences of eviction from the effects of correlated sources of economic distress, we use a research design based on the random assignment of court cases to judges who vary in their leniency. We find that eviction increases children's residential mobility, homelessness, and likelihood of doubling up with grandparents or other adults. Eviction also disrupts school engagement, causing increased absences and school changes. While we find little impact on elementary and middle school test scores, eviction substantially reduces high school course credits. Lastly, we find that eviction reduces high school graduation and use a novel bounding method to show that this finding is not driven by differential attrition. The disruptive effects of eviction appear worse for older children and boys. Our evidence suggests that the impact of eviction on children runs through the disruption to the home environment or school engagement rather than deterioration in school or neighborhood quality, and may be moderated by access to family support networks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Divorce, Family Arrangements, and Children's Adult Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-28

    Nearly a third of American children experience parental divorce before adulthood. To understand its consequences, we use linked tax and Census records for over 5 million children to examine how divorce affects family arrangements and children's long-term outcomes. Following divorce, parents move apart, household income falls, parents work longer hours, families move more frequently, and households relocate to poorer neighborhoods with less economic opportunity. This bundle of changes in family circumstances suggests multiple channels through which divorce may affect children's development and outcomes. In the years following divorce, we observe sharp increases in teen births and child mortality. To examine long-run effects on children, we compare siblings with different lengths of exposure to the same divorce. We find that parental divorce reduces children's adult earnings and college residence while increasing incarceration, mortality, and teen births. Changes in household income, neighborhood quality, and parent proximity account for 25 to 60 percent of these divorce effects.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Potential Impact of Combined Race and Ethnicity Reporting on Long-Term Earnings Statistics

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-48

    We use place of birth information from the Social Security Administration linked to earnings data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program and detailed race and ethnicity data from the 2010 Census to study how long-term earnings differentials vary by place of birth for different self-identified race and ethnicity categories. We focus on foreign-born persons from countries that are heavily Hispanic and from countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We find substantial heterogeneity of long-term earnings differentials within country of birth, some of which will be difficult to detect when the reporting format changes from the current two-question version to the new single-question version because they depend on self-identifications that place the individual in two distinct categories within the single-question format, specifically, Hispanic and White or Black, and MENA and White or Black. We also study the USA-born children of these same immigrants. Long-term earnings differences for the 2nd generation also vary as a function of self-identified ethnicity and race in ways that changing to the single-question format could affect.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Citizenship Question Effects on Household Survey Response

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-31

    Several small-sample studies have predicted that a citizenship question in the 2020 Census would cause a large drop in self-response rates. In contrast, minimal effects were found in Poehler et al.'s (2020) analysis of the 2019 Census Test randomized controlled trial (RCT). We reconcile these findings by analyzing associations between characteristics about the addresses in the 2019 Census Test and their response behavior by linking to independently constructed administrative data. We find significant heterogeneity in sensitivity to the citizenship question among households containing Hispanics, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens. Response drops the most for households containing noncitizens ineligible for a Social Security number (SSN). It falls more for households with Latin American-born immigrants than those with immigrants from other countries. Response drops less for households with U.S.-born Hispanics than households with noncitizens from Latin America. Reductions in responsiveness occur not only through lower unit self-response rates, but also by increased household roster omissions and internet break-offs. The inclusion of a citizenship question increases the undercount of households with noncitizens. Households with noncitizens also have much higher citizenship question item nonresponse rates than those only containing citizens. The use of tract-level characteristics and significant heterogeneity among Hispanics, the foreign-born, and noncitizens help explain why the effects found by Poehler et al. were so small. Linking administrative microdata with the RCT data expands what we can learn from the RCT.
    View Full Paper PDF