CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Current Population Survey'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 116

Internal Revenue Service - 101

Social Security Administration - 92

American Community Survey - 92

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 87

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 78

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 78

Protected Identification Key - 76

Social Security - 74

Social Security Number - 64

Center for Economic Studies - 64

National Science Foundation - 61

Ordinary Least Squares - 61

North American Industry Classification System - 58

Longitudinal Business Database - 53

Decennial Census - 51

Standard Industrial Classification - 45

Employer Identification Numbers - 44

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 44

Disclosure Review Board - 38

Person Validation System - 37

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 36

Federal Reserve Bank - 36

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 35

Cornell University - 35

Business Register - 34

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 34

2010 Census - 33

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 33

National Bureau of Economic Research - 31

Unemployment Insurance - 30

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 30

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 28

W-2 - 26

PSID - 25

Department of Labor - 24

Economic Census - 24

Social and Economic Supplement - 23

Person Identification Validation System - 23

Census Bureau Business Register - 23

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Special Sworn Status - 23

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 23

Service Annual Survey - 22

University of Chicago - 22

Master Address File - 21

Census of Manufactures - 21

Detailed Earnings Records - 20

University of Maryland - 20

Personally Identifiable Information - 20

Research Data Center - 20

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 19

ASEC - 18

Earned Income Tax Credit - 18

1940 Census - 17

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

National Institute on Aging - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 16

LEHD Program - 16

Local Employment Dynamics - 16

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 15

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 15

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 15

Total Factor Productivity - 14

SSA Numident - 14

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 13

Adjusted Gross Income - 13

Disability Insurance - 13

American Housing Survey - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Federal Reserve System - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Census 2000 - 13

National Center for Health Statistics - 12

Individual Characteristics File - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Housing and Urban Development - 12

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 12

Census Numident - 12

Administrative Records - 12

Department of Health and Human Services - 12

Business Employment Dynamics - 12

CPS ASEC - 11

International Trade Research Report - 11

County Business Patterns - 11

Center for Administrative Records Research - 11

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 11

Core Based Statistical Area - 11

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 11

Office of Personnel Management - 10

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

Department of Agriculture - 10

AKM - 10

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 10

Medicaid Services - 10

Labor Turnover Survey - 10

National Health Interview Survey - 10

American Economic Review - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 9

Department of Economics - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

Urban Institute - 9

Standard Occupational Classification - 9

Occupational Employment Statistics - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

JOLTS - 9

Employment History File - 9

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

MAFID - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Supreme Court - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

Employer Characteristics File - 8

COVID-19 - 7

Social Security Disability Insurance - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

NBER Summer Institute - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Economic Research Service - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

PIKed - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Society of Labor Economists - 7

Bureau of Labor - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Some Other Race - 7

New York University - 7

Public Use Micro Sample - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 7

Census Edited File - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

Census Industry Code - 7

Boston College - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

National Opinion Research Center - 7

Current Employment Statistics - 7

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 6

Data Management System - 6

Census Household Composition Key - 6

New York Times - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 6

CATI - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

University of Minnesota - 6

Journal of Human Resources - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Harvard University - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

WECD - 6

Department of Education - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Yale University - 5

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Stanford University - 5

MAF-ARF - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

Indian Housing Information Center - 5

Master Earnings File - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Department of Defense - 5

HHS - 5

2SLS - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Business Master File - 5

Federal Government - 5

Regional Economic Information System - 5

Journal of Political Economy - 5

MIT Press - 5

Summary Earnings Records - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

General Education Development - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

Technical Services - 4

NUMIDENT - 4

Federal Register - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Business Services - 4

Professional Services - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Linear Probability Models - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Census of Retail Trade - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Sample Edited Detail File - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

National Employer Survey - 3

Postal Service - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

University of Toronto - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

George Mason University - 3

Princeton University - 3

European Commission - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

World Bank - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

CAAA - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

IQR - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Public Administration - 3

VAR - 3

National Research Council - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

TFPQ - 3

employed - 104

labor - 97

workforce - 85

employ - 85

survey - 77

earnings - 74

recession - 64

population - 60

employee - 60

respondent - 59

economist - 50

payroll - 47

salary - 44

worker - 44

census bureau - 40

earner - 37

job - 37

estimating - 34

unemployed - 33

econometric - 33

poverty - 32

hiring - 31

census data - 31

occupation - 28

statistical - 26

expenditure - 25

data - 24

data census - 24

macroeconomic - 24

welfare - 23

hispanic - 23

irs - 23

agency - 22

insurance - 22

trend - 22

quarterly - 22

ethnicity - 21

resident - 21

heterogeneity - 21

endogeneity - 21

minority - 20

disadvantaged - 20

enrollment - 20

residence - 20

earn - 20

employment dynamics - 20

coverage - 19

unemployment rates - 19

estimation - 19

revenue - 19

layoff - 19

immigrant - 19

medicaid - 19

socioeconomic - 19

tax - 19

census employment - 19

hire - 18

percentile - 18

labor statistics - 18

ethnic - 17

survey income - 17

retirement - 17

industrial - 16

growth - 16

residential - 16

shift - 16

longitudinal - 16

estimates employment - 16

employment statistics - 15

disparity - 15

report - 15

household surveys - 15

housing - 15

manufacturing - 15

migration - 15

migrant - 15

tenure - 15

workplace - 15

ssa - 14

eligibility - 14

citizen - 14

sector - 14

assessed - 14

imputation - 14

immigration - 14

research census - 14

entrepreneur - 13

entrepreneurship - 13

employment data - 13

incentive - 13

racial - 13

race - 13

demand - 13

census survey - 13

market - 13

mobility - 13

taxpayer - 13

employment growth - 13

production - 13

employment earnings - 13

enterprise - 12

employment unemployment - 12

bias - 12

discrimination - 12

estimator - 12

sampling - 12

gdp - 12

family - 12

labor markets - 12

eligible - 12

aging - 12

1040 - 12

metropolitan - 12

work census - 12

economically - 12

employment wages - 12

employing - 12

filing - 11

disability - 11

prevalence - 11

neighborhood - 11

intergenerational - 11

migrating - 11

datasets - 11

federal - 11

use census - 11

income data - 11

medicare - 11

establishment - 11

workers earnings - 11

employment estimates - 11

clerical - 11

employer household - 11

longitudinal employer - 11

census research - 11

employee data - 11

state employment - 10

health - 10

pandemic - 10

average - 10

poorer - 10

investment - 10

innovation - 10

moving - 10

migrate - 10

microdata - 10

mexican - 10

turnover - 10

entrepreneurial - 9

benefit - 9

aggregate - 9

population survey - 9

relocation - 9

state - 9

income survey - 9

pension - 9

census responses - 9

native - 9

economic census - 9

segregation - 9

home - 9

ancestry - 9

yearly - 9

sale - 9

wage changes - 9

regress - 9

uninsured - 9

econometrician - 9

employment flows - 9

effects employment - 8

union - 8

compensation - 8

rates employment - 8

rural - 8

technological - 8

relocate - 8

company - 8

financial - 8

subsidy - 8

survey households - 8

dependent - 8

profit - 8

retiree - 8

record - 8

matching - 8

race census - 8

recessionary - 8

decade - 8

assessing - 8

venture - 8

worker demographics - 8

trends employment - 8

recession employment - 8

insurance coverage - 8

efficiency - 8

endogenous - 8

produce - 8

proprietorship - 7

proprietor - 7

agriculture - 7

2010 census - 7

productive - 7

productivity growth - 7

parent - 7

parental - 7

unobserved - 7

spillover - 7

provided census - 7

employment trends - 7

discrepancy - 7

woman - 7

poor - 7

policy - 7

earnings workers - 7

wealth - 7

corporation - 7

coverage employer - 7

earnings employees - 7

earnings age - 7

effect wages - 7

wage data - 7

healthcare - 7

income year - 7

career - 6

incorporated - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

sample - 6

latino - 6

indian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

survey data - 6

rent - 6

generation - 6

adoption - 6

mortality - 6

cohort - 6

impact - 6

census linked - 6

wage growth - 6

saving - 6

census household - 6

exogeneity - 6

labor productivity - 6

white - 6

income distributions - 6

wage earnings - 6

associate - 6

organizational - 6

earnings inequality - 6

statistician - 6

workforce indicators - 6

regressing - 6

wages production - 6

trends labor - 6

enrollee - 6

exemption - 6

segregated - 6

insured - 6

inference - 6

income households - 6

health insurance - 6

schooling - 6

income individuals - 6

educated - 6

department - 5

residing - 5

endowment - 5

community - 5

profitability - 5

technology - 5

marriage - 5

citizenship - 5

adulthood - 5

enrolled - 5

demography - 5

expense - 5

linked census - 5

industry wages - 5

transition - 5

earnings growth - 5

disclosure - 5

analysis - 5

distribution - 5

census use - 5

ownership - 5

merger - 5

accounting - 5

surveys censuses - 5

records census - 5

fiscal - 5

industry employment - 5

regression - 5

wage regressions - 5

wage industries - 5

employment recession - 5

fertility - 5

census file - 5

retail - 5

researcher - 5

founder - 5

owned businesses - 5

relocating - 5

black - 5

insurance premiums - 5

insurance employer - 5

employment count - 5

study - 5

wages employment - 4

asian - 4

renter - 4

patent - 4

sector productivity - 4

reside - 4

specialization - 4

geographic - 4

urban - 4

city - 4

environmental - 4

census years - 4

outsourced - 4

finance - 4

database - 4

employment distribution - 4

autoregressive - 4

women earnings - 4

employment effects - 4

consumption - 4

information census - 4

corporate - 4

productivity measures - 4

productivity dynamics - 4

outsourcing - 4

immigrated - 4

assimilation - 4

information - 4

homeowner - 4

employment measures - 4

owner - 4

censuses surveys - 4

interracial - 4

earnings gap - 4

wage gap - 4

gender - 4

business data - 4

increase employment - 4

wage variation - 4

grocery - 4

industry productivity - 4

productivity variation - 4

wages productivity - 4

wage differences - 4

factory - 4

business owners - 4

census business - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

taxation - 4

matched - 4

utilization - 4

premium - 4

employment changes - 4

research - 4

household income - 4

education - 4

graduate - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

town - 3

sociology - 3

spending - 3

census 2020 - 3

factor productivity - 3

depreciation - 3

productivity shocks - 3

prospect - 3

divorced - 3

census records - 3

innovate - 3

patenting - 3

geographically - 3

risk - 3

amenity - 3

export - 3

tariff - 3

growth productivity - 3

capital productivity - 3

volatility - 3

income children - 3

firms census - 3

impact employment - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

inventory - 3

financing - 3

banking - 3

ethnically - 3

classification - 3

bank - 3

pollution - 3

regional - 3

employed census - 3

businesses census - 3

consumer - 3

supermarket - 3

leverage - 3

measures productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

social - 3

locality - 3

characteristics businesses - 3

heterogeneous - 3

regressors - 3

rate - 3

commute - 3

country - 3

wage effects - 3

declining - 3

decline - 3

suburb - 3

commodity - 3

subsidized - 3

retailer - 3

acquisition - 3

inflation - 3

restructuring - 3

insurer - 3

Viewing papers 81 through 90 of 283


  • Working Paper

    Between Firm Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Dominant Role of Industry Effects

    February 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-08

    We find that most of the rising between firm earnings inequality that dominates the overall increase in inequality in the U.S. is accounted for by industry effects. These industry effects stem from rising inter-industry earnings differentials and not from changing distribution of employment across industries. We also find the rising inter-industry earnings differentials are almost completely accounted for by occupation effects. These results link together the key findings from separate components of the recent literature: one focuses on firm effects and the other on occupation effects. The link via industry effects challenges conventional wisdom.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Do Establishments Do When Wages Increase? Evidence from Minimum Wages in the United States

    November 2019

    Authors: Yuci Chen

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-31

    I investigate how establishments adjust their production plans on various margins when wage rates increase. Exploiting state-by-year variation in minimum wage, I analyze U.S. manufacturing plants' responses over a 23-year period. Using instrumental variable method and Census Microdata, I find that when the hourly wage of production workers increases by one percent, manufacturing plants reduce the total hours worked by production workers by 0.7 percent and increase capital expenditures on machinery and equipment by 2.7 percent. The reduction in total hours worked by production workers is driven by intensive-margin changes. The estimated elasticity of substitution between capital and labor is 0.85. Following the wage increases, no statistically significant changes emerge in revenue, materials or total factor productivity. Additionally, I nd that when wage rates increase, establishments are more likely to exit the market. Finally, I provide evidence that when the minimum wage increases the wages of some of the establishments in a firm, the firm also increases the wages for its other establishments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Task-based Approach to Constructing Occupational Categories with Implications for Empirical Research in Labor Economics

    September 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-27

    Most applied research in labor economics that examines returns to worker skills or differences in earnings across subgroups of workers typically accounts for the role of occupations by controlling for occupational categories. Researchers often aggregate detailed occupations into categories based on the Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) coding scheme, which is based largely on narratives or qualitative measures of workers' tasks. Alternatively, we propose two quantitative task-based approaches to constructing occupational categories by using factor analysis with O*NET job descriptors that provide a rich set of continuous measures of job tasks across all occupations. We find that our task-based approach outperforms the SOC-based approach in terms of lower occupation distance measures. We show that our task-based approach provides an intuitive, nuanced interpretation for grouping occupations and permits quantitative assessments of similarities in task compositions across occupations. We also replicate a recent analysis and find that our task-based occupational categories explain more of the gender wage gap than the SOC-based approaches explain. Our study enhances the Federal Statistical System's understanding of the SOC codes, investigates ways to use third-party data to construct useful research variables that can potentially be added to Census Bureau data products to improve their quality and versatility, and sheds light on how the use of alternative occupational categories in economics research may lead to different empirical results and deeper understanding in the analysis of labor market outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Did Timing Matter? Life Cycle Differences in Effects of Exposure to the Great Recession

    September 2019

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-25

    Exposure to a recession can have persistent, negative consequences, but does the severity of those consequences depend on when in the life cycle a person is exposed? I estimate the effects of exposure to the Great Recession on employment and earnings outcomes for groups defined by year of birth over the ten years following the beginning of the recession. With the exception of the oldest workers, all groups experience reductions in earnings and employment due to local unemployment rate shocks during the recession. Younger workers experience the largest earnings losses in percent terms (up to 13 percent), in part because recession exposure makes them persistently less likely to work for high-paying employers even as their overall employment recovers more quickly than older workers'. Younger workers also experience reductions in earnings and employment due to changes in local labor market structure associated with the recession. These effects are substantially smaller in magnitude but more persistent than the effects of unemployment rate increases.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Antipoverty Impact of the EITC: New Estimates from Survey and Administrative Tax Records

    April 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-14R

    We reassess the antipoverty effects of the EITC using unique data linking the CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplement to IRS data for the same individuals spanning years 2005-2016. We compare EITC benefits from standard simulators to administrative EITC payments and find that significantly more actual EITC payments flow to childless tax units than predicted, and to those whose family income places them above official poverty thresholds. However, actual EITC payments appear to be target efficient at the tax unit level. In 2016, about 3.1 million persons were lifted out of poverty by the EITC, substantially less than prior estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Immigrants' Earnings Growth and Return Migration from the U.S.: Examining their Determinants using Linked Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-10

    Using a novel panel data set of recent immigrants to the U.S. (2005-2007) from individual-level linked U.S. Census Bureau survey data and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administrative records, we identify the determinants of return migration and earnings growth for this immigrant arrival cohort. We show that by 10 years after arrival almost 40 percent have return migrated. Our analysis examines these flows by educational attainment, country of birth, and English language ability separately for each gender. We show, for the first time, that return migrants experience downward earnings mobility over two to three years prior to their return migration. This finding suggests that economic shocks are closely related to emigration decisions; time-variant unobserved characteristics may be more important in determining out-migration than previously known. We also show that wage assimilation with native-born populations occurs fairly quickly; after 10 years there is strong convergence in earnings by several characteristics. Finally, we confirm that the use of stock-based panel data lead to estimates of slower earnings growth than is found using repeated cross-section data. However, we also show, using selection-correction methods in our panel data, that stock-based panel data may understate the rate of earnings growth for the initial immigrant arrival cohort when emigration is not accounted for.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity in the United States: New Evidence from Worker-Firm Linked Data

    February 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-07

    This paper examines the extent and consequences of Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity (DNWR) using administrative worker-firm linked data from the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) program for a large representative U.S. state. Prior to the Great Recession, only 7-8% of job stayers are paid the same nominal hourly wage rate as one year earlier - substantially less than previously found in survey-based data - and about 20% of job stayers experience a wage cut. During the Great Recession, the incidence of wage cuts increases to 30%, followed by a large rise in the proportion of wage freezes to 16% as the economy recovers. Total earnings of job stayers exhibit even fewer zero changes and a larger incidence of reductions than hourly wage rates, due to systematic variations in hours worked. The results are consistent with concurrent findings in the literature that reductions in base pay are exceedingly rare but that firms use different forms of non-base pay and variations in hours worked to flexibilize labor cost. We then exploit the worker-firm link of the LEHD and find that during the Great Recession, firms with indicators of DNWR reduced employment by about 1.2% more per year. This negative effect is driven by significantly lower hiring rates and persists into the recovery. Our results suggest that despite the relatively large incidence of wage cuts in the aggregate, DNWR has sizable allocative consequences.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The effect of child support on selection into marriage and fertility

    February 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-04

    Child support policies in the United States have expanded dramatically since the mid-1970s and now cover 1 in 5 children. This paper studies the consequences of child support for marriage and fertility decisions. I first introduce a model showing that child support enforces ex ante commitment from men to provide financial support in the event of a child, which (1) increases premarital sex among couples unlikely to marry, and (2) reduces the abortion rate, by lessening the cost of raising a child as a single mom. Using variation in the timing and geography of the rollout of U.S. child support laws relative to the timing of pregnancy, from 1977 to 1992, I find that marriages following an unplanned pregnancy are less likely to occur under strengthened child support laws, accounting for about a 7-8 percentage point reduction relative to a base of 38 percent. I find that the child support rollout reduced the abortion rate by 1-2 per 1000 women aged 15-44, off a base of 28, representing about 50 percent of the total decline in the abortion rate over this period.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure S2014 files in the FSRDC

    September 2018

    Authors: Lars Vilhuber

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-27R

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, maintains a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2014 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's secure and restricted-access Research Data Center network. The document attempts to provide a comprehensive description of all researcher-accessible files, of their creation, and of any modifications made to the files to facilitate researcher access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Labor Market Concentration, Earnings Inequality, and Earnings Mobility

    September 2018

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2018-10

    Using data from the Longitudinal Business Database and Form W-2, I document trends in local industrial concentration from 1976 through 2015 and estimate the effects of that concentration on earnings outcomes within and across demographic groups. Local industrial concentration has generally been declining throughout its distribution over that period, unlike national industrial concentration, which declined sharply in the early 1980s before increasing steadily to nearly its original level beginning around 1990. Estimates indicate that increased local concentration reduces earnings and increases inequality, but observed changes in concentration have been in the opposite direction, and the magnitude of these effects has been modest relative to broader trends; back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that the 90/10 earnings ratio was about six percent lower and earnings were about one percent higher in 2015 than they would have been if local concentration were at its 1976 level. Within demographic subgroups, most experience mean earnings reductions and all experience increases in inequality. Estimates of the effects of concentration on earnings mobility are sensitive to specification.
    View Full Paper PDF