CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Alfred P Sloan Foundation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 89

National Science Foundation - 65

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 45

Longitudinal Business Database - 37

Current Population Survey - 34

International Trade Research Report - 34

Cornell University - 34

North American Industry Classification System - 33

Standard Industrial Classification - 33

Employer Identification Numbers - 32

Social Security Administration - 28

Internal Revenue Service - 28

Ordinary Least Squares - 27

National Institute on Aging - 25

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 25

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 24

Center for Economic Studies - 23

Unemployment Insurance - 22

American Community Survey - 22

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 21

Individual Characteristics File - 19

Disclosure Review Board - 19

Social Security Number - 19

LEHD Program - 19

National Bureau of Economic Research - 18

Employment History File - 18

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 17

Decennial Census - 16

Social Security - 16

Employer Characteristics File - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 15

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 15

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 14

Business Register Bridge - 14

Business Register - 14

Federal Reserve Bank - 13

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 12

Economic Census - 12

Department of Labor - 11

Protected Identification Key - 11

Census of Manufactures - 10

Total Factor Productivity - 10

Service Annual Survey - 10

Census Bureau Business Register - 10

AKM - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

University of Chicago - 9

American Economic Review - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 8

Master Address File - 8

Employer-Household Dynamics - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Office of Personnel Management - 7

PSID - 7

Business Employment Dynamics - 7

Federal Reserve System - 6

Department of Economics - 6

University of Maryland - 6

University of Michigan - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

American Housing Survey - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

North American Industry Classi - 6

MIT Press - 6

Technical Services - 5

Cobb-Douglas - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

BLS Handbook of Methods - 5

W-2 - 5

Business Master File - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

New York University - 4

Person Validation System - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

2SLS - 4

Postal Service - 4

North American Free Trade Agreement - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

Journal of Econometrics - 4

Review of Economic Studies - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

Longitudinal Research Database - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Duke University - 4

Labor Turnover Survey - 4

IZA - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Department of Justice - 3

Boston College - 3

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Columbia University - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

Census Numident - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

2010 Census - 3

Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

JOLTS - 3

Journal of International Economics - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

employ - 54

workforce - 51

employed - 50

employee - 44

labor - 40

earnings - 38

payroll - 25

econometric - 22

economist - 20

quarterly - 20

survey - 19

endogeneity - 18

entrepreneurship - 17

worker - 16

estimating - 16

hiring - 15

employer household - 15

statistical - 15

entrepreneur - 14

recession - 14

longitudinal employer - 14

census bureau - 14

earner - 13

venture - 13

salary - 13

employment dynamics - 13

heterogeneity - 12

earn - 12

unemployed - 12

tenure - 12

research census - 12

layoff - 11

employment statistics - 11

employee data - 11

census employment - 11

longitudinal - 11

employing - 10

macroeconomic - 10

job - 10

data - 10

agency - 10

finance - 9

entrepreneurial - 9

employment growth - 9

employment earnings - 9

data census - 9

occupation - 9

turnover - 9

statistician - 9

census data - 9

aging - 9

acquisition - 8

incentive - 8

revenue - 8

prospect - 8

hire - 8

employment count - 8

workforce indicators - 8

respondent - 8

population - 8

workplace - 8

company - 7

expenditure - 7

residential - 7

leverage - 7

rent - 7

bankruptcy - 7

econometrician - 7

accounting - 7

analysis - 7

report - 7

investment - 6

investor - 6

minority - 6

disadvantaged - 6

profitability - 6

growth - 6

housing - 6

shift - 6

opportunity - 6

debt - 6

demand - 6

welfare - 6

linked census - 6

founder - 6

employment estimates - 6

estimation - 6

employment data - 6

labor statistics - 6

economic census - 6

market - 5

profit - 5

financial - 5

financing - 5

manufacturing - 5

industrial - 5

sector - 5

innovation - 5

neighborhood - 5

economically - 5

earnings age - 5

wealth - 5

employment wages - 5

establishment - 5

discrimination - 5

worker demographics - 5

microdata - 5

ssa - 5

labor markets - 5

census research - 5

imputation - 5

organizational - 5

competitor - 5

earnings workers - 5

researcher - 5

disclosure - 5

research - 5

privacy - 5

endogenous - 5

gdp - 4

ethnic - 4

segregation - 4

corporate - 4

resident - 4

residence - 4

renter - 4

state - 4

spillover - 4

relocation - 4

exogeneity - 4

tax - 4

workers earnings - 4

unemployment rates - 4

transition - 4

earnings growth - 4

immigrant - 4

ethnicity - 4

compensation - 4

census business - 4

household surveys - 4

datasets - 4

earnings employees - 4

poverty - 4

younger firms - 4

measures employment - 4

export - 4

estimates employment - 4

information - 4

department - 4

statistical agencies - 4

employment effects - 3

funding - 3

technological - 3

depreciation - 3

patent - 3

black - 3

segregated - 3

racial - 3

race - 3

insurance - 3

home - 3

relocate - 3

worker wages - 3

impact employment - 3

employment distribution - 3

bias - 3

immigration - 3

creditor - 3

cost - 3

work census - 3

retirement - 3

federal - 3

union - 3

employment trends - 3

record - 3

strategic - 3

earnings inequality - 3

startup - 3

startups employees - 3

effect wages - 3

firms young - 3

indicator - 3

employment measures - 3

aggregate - 3

yearly - 3

mobility - 3

wage growth - 3

database - 3

economic statistics - 3

social - 3

clerical - 3

census file - 3

censuses surveys - 3

confidentiality - 3

irs - 3

filing - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

wage data - 3

decline - 3

unobserved - 3

emission - 3

pollution - 3

epa - 3

restructuring - 3

merger - 3

competitiveness - 3

regulation - 3

regressing - 3

assessing - 3

wage changes - 3

production - 3

educated - 3

Viewing papers 81 through 90 of 104


  • Working Paper

    Changes in Workplace Segregation in the United States Between 1990 and 2000: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data

    June 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-15

    We present evidence on changes in workplace segregation by education, race, ethnicity, and sex, from 1990 to 2000. The evidence indicates that racial and ethnic segregation at the workplace level remained quite pervasive in 2000. At the same time, there was fairly substantial segregation by skill, as measured by education. Putting together the 1990 and 2000 data, we find no evidence of declines in workplace segregation by race and ethnicity; indeed, black-white segregation increased. Over this decade, segregation by education also increased. In contrast, workplace segregation by sex fell over the decade, and would have fallen by more had the services industry - a heavily female industry in which sex segregation is relatively high - not experienced rapid employment growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Do Employment Protections Reduce Productivity? Evidence from U.S. States

    March 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-04

    Theory predicts that mandated employment protections may reduce productivity by distorting production choices. Firms facing (non-Coasean) worker dismissal costs will curtail hiring below efficient levels and retain unproductive workers, both of which should affect productivity. These theoretical predictions have rarely been tested. We use the adoption of wrongful discharge protections by U.S. state courts over the last three decades to evaluate the link between dismissal costs and productivity. Drawing on establishment-level data from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers and the Longitudinal Business Database, our estimates suggest that wrongful discharge protections reduce employment flows and firm entry rates. Moreover, analysis of plant-level data provides evidence of capital deepening and a decline in total factor productivity following the introduction of wrongful discharge protections. This last result is potentially quite important, suggesting that mandated employment protections reduce productive efficiency as theory would suggest. However, our analysis also presents some puzzles including, most significantly, evidence of strong employment growth following adoption of dismissal protections. In light of these puzzles, we read our findings as suggestive but tentative.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Distribution Preserving Statistical Disclosure Limitation

    September 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-04

    One approach to limiting disclosure risk in public-use microdata is to release multiply-imputed, partially synthetic data sets. These are data on actual respondents, but with confidential data replaced by multiply-imputed synthetic values. A mis-specified imputation model can invalidate inferences because the distribution of synthetic data is completely determined by the model used to generate them. We present two practical methods of generating synthetic values when the imputer has only limited information about the true data generating process. One is applicable when the true likelihood is known up to a monotone transformation. The second requires only limited knowledge of the true likelihood, but nevertheless preserves the conditional distribution of the confidential data, up to sampling error, on arbitrary subdomains. Our method maximizes data utility and minimizes incremental disclosure risk up to posterior uncertainty in the imputation model and sampling error in the estimated transformation. We validate the approach with a simulation and application to a large linked employer-employee database.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using linked employer-employee data to investigate the speed of adjustments in downsizing firms

    May 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-03

    When firms are faced with a demand shock, adjustment can take many forms. Firms can adjust physical capital, human capital, or both. The speed of adjustment may differ as well: costs of adjustment, the type of shock, the legal and economic enviroment all matter. In this paper, we focus on firms that downsized between 1992 and 1997, but ultimately survive, and investigate how the human capital distribution within a firm influences the speed of adjustment, ceteris paribus. In other words, when do firms use mass layoffs instead of attrition to adjust the level of employment. We combine worker-level wage records and measures of human capital with firm-level characteristics of the production function, and use levels and changes in these variables to characterize the choice of adjustment method and speed. Firms are described/compared up to 9 years prior to death. We also consider how workers fare after leaving downsizing firms, and analyze if observed differences in post-separation outcomes of workers provide clues to the choice of adjustment speed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Downsizing, Layoffs and Plant Closure: The Impacts of Import Price Pressure and Technological Growth on U.S. Textile Producers

    April 2006

    Authors: Patrick Conway

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-10

    Downsizing, layoffs and plant closure are three plant-level responses to adverse economic conditions. I provide a theoretical and empirical analysis that illustrates the sources of each phenomenon and the implications for production and employment in the textiles industry. I consider two potential causes of these phenomena: technological progress and increased import competition. I create a micro-founded model of plant-level decision-making and combine it with conditions for dynamic market equilibrium. Through use of detailed plant-level information available in the US Census of Manufacturers and the Annual Survey of Manufacturers for the period 1982-2001, along with price data on imports, I examine the relative contribution of technology and import competition to the decline in output, employment and number of plants in textiles production in the US in recent years. The market-clearing domestic price of textiles is identified as a crucial channel in transmitting technology or import price shocks to downsizing, layoffs and plant closure. The model is estimated on two 4-digit sectors of textiles production (SIC 2211, broadwoven cotton and SIC 2221, broadwoven man-made fiber). The results validate modeling the production sectors as monopolistically competitive, and the elasticity of substitution between foreign and domestic varieties is found to be quite high. The coefficients on the productive technology are sensible, as are the estimated parameters of the plant exit, entry and investment decision rules. In simulations for the broadwoven cotton industry, the effects of technological progress are shown to have a much larger impact on layoffs than on plant closure, with plant size as measured by output actually increasing. Falling foreign prices lead to greater relative magnitudes of plant closure than of downsizing or layoffs.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Import Price Pressure on Firm Productivity and Employment: The Case of U.S. Textiles

    March 2006

    Authors: Patrick Conway

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-09

    Theoretical research has predicted three different effects of increased import competition on plant-level behavior: reduced domestic production and sales, improving average efficiency of plants, and increased exit of marginal firms. In empirical work, though, such effects are difficult to separate from the impact of exogenous technological progress (or regress). I use detailed plant-level information available in the US Census of Manufacturers and the Annual Survey of Manufacturers for the period 1983-2000 to decompose these effects. I derive the relative contribution of technology and import competition to the increase in productivity and the decline in employment in textiles production in the US in recent years. I then simulate the impact of removal of quota protection on the scale of operation of the average plant and the incentive to plant closure. The methodology employs a number of important innovations in examining the impact of falling import prices on the domestic production of an import-competing good. First, import competition is modeled directly through its impact on the relative prices of monopolistically competitive goods along the lines suggested by Melitz (2000). Second, the effect of technology is incorporated through structural estimation of plant-level production functions in four factors (capital, labor, energy and materials). Solutions to econometric difficulties related to missing capital data and unobserved productivity are incorporated into the estimation technique. The model is estimated for plants with primary product in SIC 2211 (broadwoven cotton cloth). Results validate modeling demand as for differentiated products. Technological coefficients are sensible, with exogenous technological progress playing a large role. In the simulations run, the effects of foreign price competition are orders of magnitude higher than those of technological progress for the period after quotas on imports are removed. The large-scale reduction in employment and output in the US is shown to be a combination of reduced employment and output at plants in continuous operation and of plant closures that exceed new entries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Employer-Provided Benefit Plans, Workforce Composition and Firm Outcomes

    January 2005

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2005-01

    What do firms gain by offering benefits? Economists have proposed two payoffs: (i) benefits may be a more cost-effective form of compensation than wages for employees facing high marginal tax rates, and (ii) benefits may attract a more stable, skilled workforce. Both should improve firm outcomes, but we have little evidence on this matter. This paper exploits a rich new dataset to examine how firm productivity and survival are related to benefit offering, and finds that benefit-offering firms have higher productivity and higher survival rates. Differences in firm and workforce characteristics explain some but not all of the differences in outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    New Approaches to Confidentiality Protection Synthetic Data, Remote Access and Research Data Centers

    June 2004

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2004-03

    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Relation among Human Capital, Productivity and Market Value: Building Up from Micro Evidence

    December 2002

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-14

    This paper investigates and evaluates the direct and indirect contribution of human capital to business productivity and shareholder value. The impact of human capital may occur in two ways: the specific knowledge of workers at businesses may directly increase business performance, or a skilled workforce may also indirectly act as a complement to improved technologies, business models or organizational practices. We use newly created firm-level measures of workforce human capital and productivity to examine links between those measures and the market value of the employing firm. The new human capital measures come from an integrated employer-employee data base under development at the US Census Bureau. We link these data to financial information from Compustat at the firm level, which provides measures of market value and tangible assets. The combination of these two sources permits examination of the link between human capital, productivity, and market value. There is a substantial positive relation between human capital and market value that is primarily related to the unmeasured personal characteristics of the employees, which are captured by the new measures.
    View Full Paper PDF