CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): '2010 Census'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 65

Protected Identification Key - 44

Internal Revenue Service - 37

Decennial Census - 34

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 33

Current Population Survey - 33

Social Security Number - 31

Social Security Administration - 30

Center for Economic Studies - 23

Person Validation System - 23

Master Address File - 22

Social Security - 21

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 21

North American Industry Classification System - 20

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 20

Office of Management and Budget - 20

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 19

Some Other Race - 17

Disclosure Review Board - 16

Ordinary Least Squares - 16

Administrative Records - 16

1940 Census - 15

National Science Foundation - 15

Housing and Urban Development - 15

Person Identification Validation System - 14

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

Personally Identifiable Information - 13

Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Census 2000 - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 11

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 11

SSA Numident - 11

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 11

Indian Health Service - 11

Service Annual Survey - 11

MAFID - 10

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 10

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 10

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 10

Census of Manufactures - 10

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 10

Cornell University - 9

Census Edited File - 9

Economic Census - 9

National Bureau of Economic Research - 9

W-2 - 9

Employer Identification Numbers - 9

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 9

Postal Service - 9

Research Data Center - 9

Business Register - 8

Medicaid Services - 8

Census Numident - 8

Census Bureau Business Register - 8

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 8

Census Household Composition Key - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 7

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 7

American Housing Survey - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 7

United States Census Bureau - 6

County Business Patterns - 6

MAF-ARF - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

NUMIDENT - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 6

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 6

LEHD Program - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

University of Chicago - 5

University of Maryland - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Master Beneficiary Record - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

American Economic Association - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

Federal Reserve Bank - 5

DOB - 5

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 5

Standard Industrial Classification - 5

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Federal Poverty Level - 4

Disability Insurance - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Company Organization Survey - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

United Nations - 3

Department of Economics - 3

National Center for Health Statistics - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

General Education Development - 3

Data Management System - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Generalized Method of Moments - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 3

Federal Reserve System - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

World Bank - 3

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

PIKed - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Technical Services - 3

Harvard University - 3

CATI - 3

2SLS - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

population - 40

ethnicity - 31

hispanic - 31

respondent - 30

census data - 29

survey - 27

minority - 22

immigrant - 22

resident - 21

residence - 19

citizen - 19

ethnic - 19

census bureau - 18

data - 18

race - 18

racial - 17

census responses - 16

employed - 16

workforce - 15

neighborhood - 15

use census - 14

metropolitan - 14

immigration - 14

housing - 13

residential - 13

record - 13

white - 13

employ - 12

disparity - 12

2010 census - 12

data census - 12

migrant - 12

black - 12

statistical - 11

agency - 11

datasets - 11

segregation - 11

census records - 11

recession - 11

poverty - 10

census survey - 10

socioeconomic - 10

native - 10

labor - 10

assessed - 9

mexican - 9

latino - 9

imputation - 9

enrollment - 9

census use - 9

disadvantaged - 8

ancestry - 8

estimating - 8

migration - 8

employment data - 7

census employment - 7

census 2020 - 7

race census - 7

discrimination - 7

microdata - 7

percentile - 6

work census - 6

payroll - 6

employment statistics - 6

irs - 6

ssa - 6

medicaid - 6

expenditure - 6

census household - 6

citizenship - 6

matching - 6

analysis - 6

segregated - 6

employee - 6

records census - 6

worker - 6

production - 6

manufacturing - 6

econometric - 6

report - 5

research census - 5

provided census - 5

employed census - 5

rural - 5

geography - 5

suburb - 5

geographic - 5

intergenerational - 5

family - 5

sampling - 5

household surveys - 5

census linked - 5

heterogeneity - 5

1040 - 5

federal - 5

unemployed - 5

welfare - 5

state - 5

reside - 5

statistician - 5

enterprise - 5

entrepreneur - 5

job - 5

industrial - 5

census research - 5

censuses surveys - 4

grandparent - 4

survey households - 4

eligible - 4

coverage - 4

bias - 4

database - 4

asian - 4

indian - 4

disclosure - 4

estimator - 4

neighbor - 4

privacy - 4

residing - 4

department - 4

lending - 4

bank - 4

home - 4

venture - 4

entrepreneurship - 4

proprietor - 4

financial - 4

hiring - 4

endogeneity - 4

growth - 4

gdp - 4

proprietorship - 4

sale - 4

export - 4

wholesale - 4

economist - 4

sector - 4

commute - 4

demand - 4

census file - 4

clerical - 4

decade - 3

census disclosure - 3

urban - 3

urbanization - 3

city - 3

relocation - 3

rent - 3

renter - 3

generation - 3

adoption - 3

eligibility - 3

population survey - 3

propensity - 3

survey income - 3

earnings - 3

immigrated - 3

discriminatory - 3

linkage - 3

quarterly - 3

environmental - 3

borrower - 3

loan - 3

lender - 3

saving - 3

homeowner - 3

regression - 3

individuals census - 3

midwest - 3

finance - 3

capital - 3

hire - 3

assimilation - 3

geographically - 3

salary - 3

unemployment rates - 3

regress - 3

concentration - 3

manufacturer - 3

surveys censuses - 3

policy - 3

regional - 3

firms census - 3

tax - 3

revenue - 3

impact - 3

aggregate - 3

schooling - 3

country - 3

mobility - 3

occupation - 3

interracial - 3

layoff - 3

hurricane - 3

industrialized - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 80 of 99


  • Working Paper

    Coverage and Agreement of Administrative Records and 2010 American Community Survey Demographic Data

    November 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2014-14

    The U.S. Census Bureau is researching possible uses of administrative records in decennial census and survey operations. The 2010 Census Match Study and American Community Survey (ACS) Match Study represent recent efforts by the Census Bureau to evaluate the extent to which administrative records provide data on persons and addresses in the 2010 Census and 2010 ACS. The 2010 Census Match Study also examines demographic response data collected in administrative records. Building on this analysis, we match data from the 2010 ACS to federal administrative records and third party data as well as to previous census data and examine administrative records coverage and agreement of ACS age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin responses. We find high levels of coverage and agreement for sex and age responses and variable coverage and agreement across race and Hispanic origin groups. These results are similar to findings from the 2010 Census Match Study.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Design Comparison of LODES and ACS Commuting Data Products

    October 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-38

    The Census Bureau produces two complementary data products, the American Community Survey (ACS) commuting and workplace data and the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), which can be used to answer questions about spatial, economic, and demographic questions relating to workplaces and home-to-work flows. The products are complementary in the sense that they measure similar activities but each has important unique characteristics that provide information that the other measure cannot. As a result of questions from data users, the Census Bureau has created this document to highlight the major design differences between these two data products. This report guides users on the relative advantages of each data product for various analyses and helps explain differences that may arise when using the products.2,3 As an overview, these two data products are sourced from different inputs, cover different populations and time periods, are subject to different sets of edits and imputations, are released under different confidentiality protection mechanisms, and are tabulated at different geographic and characteristic levels. As a general rule, the two data products should not be expected to match exactly for arbitrary queries and may differ substantially for some queries. Within this document, we compare the two data products by the design elements that were deemed most likely to contribute to differences in tabulated data. These elements are: Collection, Coverage, Geographic and Longitudinal Scope, Job Definition and Reference Period, Job and Worker Characteristics, Location Definitions (Workplace and Residence), Completeness of Geographic Information and Edits/Imputations, Geographic Tabulation Levels, Control Totals, Confidentiality Protection and Suppression, and Related Public-Use Data Products. An in-depth data analysis'in aggregate or with the microdata'between the two data products will be the subject of a future technical report. The Census Bureau has begun a pilot project to integrate ACS microdata with LEHD administrative data to develop an enhanced frame of employment status, place of work, and commuting. The Census Bureau will publish quality metrics for person match rates, residence and workplace match rates, and commute distance comparisons.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Creating Linked Historical Data: An Assessment of the Census Bureau's Ability to Assign Protected Identification Keys to the 1960 Census

    September 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2014-12

    In order to study social phenomena over the course of the 20th century, the Census Bureau is investigating the feasibility of digitizing historical census records and linking them to contemporary data. However, historical censuses have limited personally identifiable information available to match on. In this paper, I discuss the problems associated with matching older censuses to contemporary data files, and I describe the matching process used to match a small sample of the 1960 census to the Social Security Administration Numeric Identification System.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Person Matching in Historical Files using the Census Bureau's Person Validation System

    September 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2014-11

    The recent release of the 1940 Census manuscripts enables the creation of longitudinal data spanning the whole of the twentieth century. Linked historical and contemporary data would allow unprecedented analyses of the causes and consequences of health, demographic, and economic change. The Census Bureau is uniquely equipped to provide high quality linkages of person records across datasets. This paper summarizes the linkage techniques employed by the Census Bureau and discusses utilization of these techniques to append protected identification keys to the 1940 Census.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamics of Race: Joining, Leaving, and Staying in the American Indian/Alaska Native Race Category between 2000 and 2010

    August 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2014-10

    Each census for decades has seen the American Indian and Alaska Native population increase substantially more than expected. Changes in racial reporting seem to play an important role in the observed net increases, though research has been hampered by data limitations. We address previously unanswerable questions about race response change among American Indian and Alaska Natives (hereafter 'American Indians') using uniquely-suited (but not nationally representative) linked data from the 2000 and 2010 decennial censuses (N = 3.1 million) and the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (N = 188,131). To what extent do people change responses to include or exclude American Indian? How are people who change responses similar to or different from those who do not? How are people who join a group similar to or different from those who leave it? We find considerable race response change by people in our data, especially by multiple-race and/or Hispanic American Indians. This turnover is hidden in cross-sectional comparisons because people joining the group are similar in number and characteristics to those who leave the group. People in our data who changed their race response to add or drop American Indian differ from those who kept the same race response in 2000 and 2010 and from those who moved between a single-race and multiple-race American Indian response. Those who consistently reported American Indian (including those who added or dropped another race response) were relatively likely to report a tribe, live in an American Indian area, report American Indian ancestry, and live in the West. There are significant differences between those who joined and those who left a specific American Indian response group, but poor model fit indicates general similarity between joiners and leavers. Response changes should be considered when conceptualizing and operationalizing 'the American Indian and Alaska Native population.'
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    America's Churning Races: Race and Ethnic Response Changes between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census

    August 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2014-09

    Race and ethnicity responses can change over time and across contexts - a component of population change not usually taken into account. To what extent do race and/or Hispanic origin responses change? Is change more common to/from some race/ethnic groups than others? Does the propensity to change responses vary by characteristics of the individual? To what extent do these changes affect researchers? We use internal Census Bureau data from the 2000 and 2010 censuses in which individuals' responses have been linked across years. Approximately 9.8 million people (about 6 percent) in our large, non-representative linked data have a different race and/or Hispanic origin response in 2010 than they did in 2000. Several groups experienced considerable fluidity in racial identification: American Indians and Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders, and multiple-race response groups, as well as Hispanics when reporting a race. In contrast, race and ethnic responses for single-race non-Hispanic whites, blacks, and Asians were relatively consistent over the decade, as were ethnicity responses by Hispanics. People who change their race and/or Hispanic origin response(s) are doing so in a wide variety of ways, as anticipated by previous research. For example, people's responses change from multiple races to a single race, from a single race to multiple races, from one single race to another, and some people add or drop a Hispanic response. The inflow of people to each race/Hispanic group is in many cases similar in size to the outflow from the same group, such that cross-sectional data would show a small net change. We find response changes across ages, sexes, regions, and response modes, with variation across groups. Researchers should consider the implications of changing race and Hispanic origin responses when conducting analyses and interpreting results.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    TAKEN BY STORM: BUSINESS SURVIVAL IN THE AFTERMATH OF HURRICANE KATRINA

    April 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-20

    We use Hurricane Katrina's damage to the Mississippi coast in 2005 as a natural experiment to study business survival in the aftermath of a cost shock. We find that damaged establishments that returned to operation were more resilient than those that had never been damaged. This effect is particularly strong for establishments belonging to younger and smaller rms. The effect of damage on establishments in older and larger chains was more limited, and they were subsequently less resilient having survived the damage. These selection effects persist up to five years after the initial shock. We interpret these findings as evidence that the effect of the shock is tied to the presence of financial and other constraints.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Factoryless Goods Producers in the US

    September 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-46

    This paper documents the extent and characteristics of plants and firms in the US that are outside the manufacturing sector according to official government statistics but nonetheless are heavily involved in activities related to the production of manufactured goods. Using new data on establishment activities in the Census of Wholesale Trade conducted by the US Bureau of the Census in 2002 and 2007, this paper provides evidence on so-called 'factoryless goods producers' (FGPs) in the US economy. FGPs are formally in the wholesale sector but, unlike traditional wholesale establishments, FGPs design the goods they sell and coordinate the production activities. This paper documents the extent of FGPs in the wholesale sector and how they differ from traditional wholesalers in terms of their employment, wages, productivity and output. Reclassifying FGP establishments to the manufacturing sector using our definition would have shifted at least 595,000 workers to as many as 1,311,000 workers from wholesale to manufacturing sectors in 2002 and at least 431,000 workers to as many as 1,934,000 workers in 2007.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    MEASURING 'FACTORYLESS' MANUFACTURING: EVIDENCE FROM U.S. SURVEYS

    August 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-44

    'Factoryless' manufacturers, as defined by the U.S. OMB, perform underlying entrepreneurial components of arranging the factors of production but outsource all of the actual transformation activities to other specialized units. This paper describes efforts to measure 'factoryless' manufacturing through analyzing data on contract manufacturing services (CMS). We explore two U.S. firm surveys that report data on CMS activities and discuss challenges with identifying and collecting data on entities that are part of global value chains.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Impact of Low-Income Universal Service Programs

    June 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-33

    This policy study uses U.S. Census microdata to evaluate how subsidies for universal telephone service vary in their impact across low-income racial groups, gender, age, and home ownership. Our demand specification includes both the subsidized monthly price (Lifeline program) and the subsidized initial connection price (Linkup program) for local telephone service. Our quasimaximum likelihood estimation controls for location differences and instruments for price endogeneity. The microdata allow us to estimate the effects of demographics on both elasticities of telephone penetration and the level of telephone penetration. Based on our preferred estimates, the subsidy programs increased aggregate penetration by 6.1% for low-income households. Our results suggest that Linkup is more cost-effective than Lifeline and that auto-enroll policies are important, which calls into question a recent FCC (2012) decision to reduce Linkup subsidies in favor of Lifeline. Our study can inform the evaluation of similar universal service policies for Internet access.
    View Full Paper PDF