CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'National Bureau of Economic Research'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 96

North American Industry Classification System - 89

National Science Foundation - 82

Center for Economic Studies - 81

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 78

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 70

Total Factor Productivity - 68

Ordinary Least Squares - 66

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 66

Standard Industrial Classification - 60

Census of Manufactures - 53

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 50

Internal Revenue Service - 47

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 46

Federal Reserve Bank - 44

Longitudinal Research Database - 43

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 38

Business Register - 35

Economic Census - 35

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 33

Current Population Survey - 32

Employer Identification Numbers - 31

University of Chicago - 31

Special Sworn Status - 30

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 29

American Community Survey - 28

Research Data Center - 27

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 26

Disclosure Review Board - 24

Federal Reserve System - 24

Social Security Administration - 23

Cobb-Douglas - 23

Census Bureau Business Register - 22

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 22

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 21

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 21

Business Dynamics Statistics - 20

American Economic Review - 20

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 19

World Bank - 19

University of Maryland - 18

Decennial Census - 18

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 18

Kauffman Foundation - 18

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 16

New York University - 16

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 16

Social Security - 15

University of Michigan - 15

Harmonized System - 15

Journal of Political Economy - 15

Protected Identification Key - 14

Environmental Protection Agency - 14

Social Security Number - 13

International Trade Research Report - 13

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 13

Person Validation System - 12

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 12

Department of Economics - 12

World Trade Organization - 12

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 11

Board of Governors - 11

Technical Services - 11

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 11

County Business Patterns - 11

Department of Homeland Security - 11

Generalized Method of Moments - 11

Sloan Foundation - 11

Harvard University - 11

Journal of Economic Literature - 11

Journal of International Economics - 11

Patent and Trademark Office - 10

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 10

2010 Census - 10

Boston College - 10

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 10

Department of Labor - 10

Cornell University - 10

American Economic Association - 10

Review of Economics and Statistics - 10

Department of Commerce - 10

W-2 - 9

National Income and Product Accounts - 9

Wholesale Trade - 9

National Center for Health Statistics - 9

Energy Information Administration - 9

Postal Service - 9

Stanford University - 9

Journal of Econometrics - 9

COMPUSTAT - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Journal of Labor Economics - 9

Boston Research Data Center - 9

PSID - 8

European Union - 8

E32 - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

Retail Trade - 8

IZA - 8

Review of Economic Studies - 8

University of Toronto - 8

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 8

Service Annual Survey - 8

University of California Los Angeles - 7

Center for Research in Security Prices - 7

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

Federal Trade Commission - 7

NBER Summer Institute - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

1940 Census - 7

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 7

National Institute on Aging - 7

Business Services - 7

Characteristics of Business Owners - 7

Earned Income Tax Credit - 7

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 7

MIT Press - 7

IQR - 7

AKM - 7

Permanent Plant Number - 7

Person Identification Validation System - 6

Russell Sage Foundation - 6

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 6

Supreme Court - 6

UC Berkeley - 6

Department of Justice - 6

National Establishment Time Series - 6

Heckscher-Ohlin - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Unemployment Insurance - 6

Princeton University Press - 6

Public Administration - 6

State Energy Data System - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

Survey of Business Owners - 6

TFPQ - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

LEHD Program - 6

Statistics Canada - 6

Journal of Human Resources - 6

COVID-19 - 5

Fabricated Metal Products - 5

Yale University - 5

Department of Education - 5

VAR - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Core Based Statistical Area - 5

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

Company Organization Survey - 5

Columbia University - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 5

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Department of Agriculture - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

Foreign Direct Investment - 5

BLS Handbook of Methods - 5

Urban Institute - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

New York Times - 5

Net Present Value - 5

Stern School of Business - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 5

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

CPS ASEC - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

University of California - 4

Northwestern University - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Federal Register - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

Department of Energy - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Washington University - 4

Labor Turnover Survey - 4

JOLTS - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Educational Services - 4

Health Care and Social Assistance - 4

University of Texas - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

National Employer Survey - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Value Added - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Kauffman Firm Survey - 4

American Statistical Association - 4

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 4

CAAA - 4

Securities Data Company - 4

ASEC - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Personally Identifiable Information - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Census Numident - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Department of State - 3

Retirement History Survey - 3

Princeton University - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 3

European Commission - 3

Research and Development - 3

IBM - 3

Professional Services - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

National Research Council - 3

MWTP - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

TFPR - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

Census of Retail Trade - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Penn State University - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

Duke University - 3

Computer Network Use Supplement - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

Georgetown University - 3

Master Beneficiary Record - 3

manufacturing - 67

production - 64

macroeconomic - 56

market - 55

growth - 51

econometric - 51

labor - 48

recession - 48

economist - 47

industrial - 44

gdp - 43

sale - 39

employ - 38

revenue - 37

expenditure - 37

investment - 33

export - 31

workforce - 30

employed - 29

produce - 28

demand - 27

earnings - 27

economically - 27

employee - 25

innovation - 24

endogeneity - 24

manufacturer - 24

company - 24

quarterly - 22

sector - 22

estimating - 22

payroll - 20

exporter - 20

enterprise - 20

entrepreneurship - 20

tax - 18

acquisition - 18

efficiency - 18

trend - 17

productive - 17

import - 17

aggregate - 17

hiring - 17

productivity growth - 17

organizational - 17

financial - 16

technological - 16

monopolistic - 16

profit - 16

tariff - 16

entrepreneur - 16

industry productivity - 16

finance - 15

multinational - 15

spillover - 15

salary - 15

estimation - 15

regulation - 15

trading - 14

incentive - 14

firms productivity - 14

employment growth - 14

patent - 13

merger - 13

accounting - 13

housing - 13

price - 13

exporting - 13

cost - 13

entrepreneurial - 13

irs - 12

survey - 12

competitor - 12

corporate - 11

venture - 11

importer - 11

product - 11

worker - 11

econometrician - 11

welfare - 11

depreciation - 11

exported - 10

investor - 10

labor markets - 10

supplier - 10

migrant - 10

aggregate productivity - 10

pollution - 10

epa - 10

enrollment - 10

heterogeneity - 10

profitability - 10

commodity - 9

shipment - 9

takeover - 9

disadvantaged - 9

poverty - 9

job - 9

employment dynamics - 9

leverage - 9

stock - 9

invest - 9

immigrant - 9

labor productivity - 9

productivity dynamics - 9

establishment - 9

wholesale - 9

emission - 9

environmental - 9

recessionary - 9

taxpayer - 8

inventory - 8

residential - 8

neighborhood - 8

residence - 8

firms export - 8

earner - 8

shock - 8

hire - 8

productivity measures - 8

regulatory - 8

pollutant - 8

polluting - 8

medicare - 8

growth productivity - 8

subsidiary - 8

impact - 8

taxation - 8

subsidy - 8

restructuring - 8

family - 7

corporation - 7

technology - 7

patenting - 7

specialization - 7

bank - 7

taxable - 7

importing - 7

trader - 7

sourcing - 7

layoff - 7

occupation - 7

statistical - 7

competitiveness - 7

pricing - 7

plant productivity - 7

regression - 7

forecast - 7

bias - 7

policy - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

plants industry - 7

insurance - 7

socioeconomic - 7

productivity firms - 7

management - 7

manager - 7

economic census - 7

volatility - 7

producing - 7

1040 - 6

innovate - 6

innovative - 6

invention - 6

borrowing - 6

report - 6

disparity - 6

renter - 6

international trade - 6

trade costs - 6

autoregressive - 6

immigration - 6

migration - 6

outsourced - 6

employment trends - 6

retirement - 6

good - 6

labor statistics - 6

researcher - 6

prospect - 6

startup - 6

research - 6

industry variation - 6

firms plants - 6

medicaid - 6

minority - 6

metropolitan - 6

resident - 6

managerial - 6

turnover - 6

decline - 6

respondent - 6

shift - 6

productivity increases - 6

employing - 6

exporting firms - 6

transition - 6

earn - 6

segregation - 6

firms trade - 6

diversification - 6

factory - 6

federal - 5

filing - 5

bankruptcy - 5

debt - 5

creditor - 5

equity - 5

asset - 5

disclosure - 5

rent - 5

imported - 5

export market - 5

exogeneity - 5

employment production - 5

productivity shocks - 5

unemployed - 5

census bureau - 5

dependent - 5

aggregation - 5

ethnicity - 5

population - 5

average - 5

microdata - 5

factor productivity - 5

consumption - 5

research census - 5

industry concentration - 5

founder - 5

econometrically - 5

consumer - 5

rate - 5

uninsured - 5

healthcare - 5

share - 5

census research - 5

coverage - 5

premium - 5

acquirer - 5

agency - 5

discrimination - 5

firms exporting - 5

estimates employment - 5

estimates productivity - 5

dispersion productivity - 5

practices productivity - 5

exemption - 5

workplace - 5

productivity wage - 5

proprietorship - 5

fluctuation - 5

data - 5

performance - 5

schooling - 5

financing - 5

firms import - 5

foreign - 5

custom - 5

environmental regulation - 5

incorporated - 5

productivity plants - 5

eligibility - 4

liquidation - 4

bankrupt - 4

debtor - 4

tech - 4

loan - 4

fund - 4

intergenerational - 4

employment effects - 4

shareholder - 4

hispanic - 4

migrate - 4

warehousing - 4

innovator - 4

ethnic - 4

level productivity - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

workers earnings - 4

earnings workers - 4

valuation - 4

polluting industries - 4

retailer - 4

industries estimate - 4

study - 4

indicator - 4

regional - 4

geographically - 4

maternal - 4

measures productivity - 4

productivity analysis - 4

productivity estimates - 4

productivity size - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

industry employment - 4

commerce - 4

executive - 4

opportunity - 4

census employment - 4

wage variation - 4

insured - 4

health insurance - 4

insurance premiums - 4

data census - 4

analysis productivity - 4

associate - 4

employee data - 4

rates employment - 4

sector productivity - 4

entry productivity - 4

insurer - 4

employment statistics - 4

gain - 4

rates productivity - 4

declining - 4

spending - 4

decade - 4

wages productivity - 4

census data - 4

educated - 4

fertility - 4

longitudinal - 4

employment recession - 4

endogenous - 4

foreign trade - 4

monopolistically - 4

conglomerate - 4

plant - 4

analysis - 4

credit - 3

eligible - 3

child - 3

lender - 3

advancement - 3

innovating - 3

patented - 3

contract - 3

reporting - 3

state - 3

generation - 3

home - 3

house - 3

homeowner - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

downstream - 3

relocation - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

regressors - 3

security - 3

relocating - 3

migrating - 3

immigrant workers - 3

globalization - 3

strategic - 3

reside - 3

substitute - 3

prices products - 3

advantage - 3

firms census - 3

impact employment - 3

plant employment - 3

startup firms - 3

outsourcing - 3

pollution regulation - 3

costs pollution - 3

pollution abatement - 3

externality - 3

merchandise - 3

risk - 3

deviation - 3

electricity - 3

utility - 3

electricity prices - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

pregnancy - 3

black - 3

firms grow - 3

compensation - 3

immigrant entrepreneurs - 3

rural - 3

community - 3

investment productivity - 3

estimator - 3

recession employment - 3

fiscal - 3

pension - 3

benefit - 3

enrollee - 3

utilization - 3

statistician - 3

surveys censuses - 3

oligopolistic - 3

oligopoly - 3

productivity differences - 3

lending - 3

banking - 3

innovation productivity - 3

technology adoption - 3

earnings inequality - 3

proprietor - 3

employment distribution - 3

corp - 3

empirical - 3

school - 3

census business - 3

marriage - 3

aging - 3

trends employment - 3

diversified - 3

diversify - 3

demography - 3

unemployment rates - 3

employment declines - 3

unobserved - 3

buyer - 3

ssa - 3

exogenous - 3

coverage employer - 3

effect wages - 3

investing - 3

plant investment - 3

regulated - 3

firm growth - 3

plants firms - 3

manufacturing industries - 3

neighbor - 3

capital - 3

efficient - 3

censuses surveys - 3

profitable - 3

wage differences - 3

textile - 3

distribution - 3

census years - 3

observed productivity - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 80 of 230


  • Working Paper

    Punctuated Entrepreneurship (Among Women)

    May 2018

    Authors: Matt Marx

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-26

    The gender gap in entrepreneurship may be explained in part by employee non-compete agreements. Exploiting exogenous state-level variation in non-compete policy, I find that women more strictly subject to non-competes are 11-17% more likely to start companies after their employers dissolve. This result is not explained by the incidence of non-competes or lawsuits; however, women face higher relative costs in defending against potential litigation and in returning to paid employment after abandoning their ventures. Thus entrepreneurship among women may be 'punctuated' in that would-be female founders are throttled by non-competes, their potential unleashed only by the failure of their employers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dispersion in Dispersion: Measuring Establishment-Level Differences in Productivity

    April 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-25RR

    We describe new experimental productivity statistics, Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP), jointly developed and published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Census Bureau. Productivity measures are critical for understanding economic performance. Official BLS productivity statistics, which are available for major sectors and detailed industries, provide information on the sources of aggregate productivity growth. A large body of research shows that within-industry variation in productivity provides important insights into productivity dynamics. This research reveals large and persistent productivity differences across businesses even within narrowly defined industries. These differences vary across industries and over time and are related to productivity-enhancing reallocation. Dispersion in productivity across businesses can provide information about the nature of competition and frictions within sectors, and about the sources of rising wage inequality across businesses. Because there were no official statistics providing this level of detail, BLS and the Census Bureau partnered to create measures of within-industry productivity dispersion. These measures complement official BLS aggregate and industry-level productivity growth statistics and thereby improve our understanding of the rich productivity dynamics in the U.S. economy. The underlying microdata for these measures are available for use by qualified researchers on approved projects in the Federal Statistical Research Data Center (FSRDC) network. These new statistics confirm the presence of large productivity differences and we hope that these new data products will encourage further research into understanding these differences.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Creditor Rights, Technology Adoption, and Productivity: Plant-Level Evidence

    April 2018

    Authors: Nuri Ersahin

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-20

    I analyze the impact of stronger creditor rights on productivity using plant-level data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Following the adoption of anti-recharacterization laws that give lenders greater access to the collateral of firms in financial distress, total factor productivity of treated plants increases by 2.6 percent. This effect is mainly observed among plants belonging to financially constrained firms. Furthermore, treated plants invest in capital of younger vintage and newer technology, and become more capital-intensive. My results suggest that stronger creditor rights relax borrowing constraints and help firms adopt more efficient production technologies.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Aggregating From Micro to Macro Patterns of Trade

    February 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-10

    We develop a new framework for aggregating from micro to macro patterns of trade. We derive price indexes that determine comparative advantage across countries and sectors and the aggregate cost of living. If firms and products are imperfect substitutes, we show that these price indexes depend on variety, average demand/quality and the dispersion of demand/quality-adjusted prices, and are only weakly related to standard empirical measures of average prices, thereby providing insight for elasticity puzzles. Of the cross-section (time-series) variation in comparative advantage, 50 (90) percent is accounted for by variety and average demand/quality, with average prices contributing less than 10 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Innovation, Productivity Dispersion, and Productivity Growth

    February 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-08

    We examine whether underlying industry innovation dynamics are an important driver of the large dispersion in productivity across firms within narrowly defined sectors. Our hypothesis is that periods of rapid innovation are accompanied by high rates of entry, significant experimentation and, in turn, a high degree of productivity dispersion. Following this experimentation phase, successful innovators and adopters grow while unsuccessful innovators contract and exit yielding productivity growth. We examine the dynamic relationship between entry, productivity dispersion, and productivity growth using a new comprehensive firm-level dataset for the U.S. We find a surge of entry within an industry yields an immediate increase in productivity dispersion and a lagged increase in productivity growth. These patterns are more pronounced for the High Tech sector where we expect there to be more innovative activities. These patterns change over time suggesting other forces are at work during the post-2000 slowdown in aggregate productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Labor Market Effects of the Affordable Care Act: Evidence from a Tax Notch

    July 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2017-07

    States that declined to raise their Medicaid income eligibility cutoffs to 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created a "coverage gap'' between their existing, often much lower Medicaid eligibility cutoffs and the FPL, the lowest level of income at which the ACA provides refundable, advanceable "premium tax credits'' to subsidize the purchase of private insurance. Lacking access to any form of subsidized health insurance, residents of those states with income in that range face a strong incentive, in the form of a large, discrete increase in post-tax income (i.e. an upward notch) at the FPL, to increase their earnings and obtain the premium tax credit. We investigate the extent to which they respond to that incentive. Using the universe of tax returns, we document excess mass, or bunching, in the income distribution surrounding this notch. Consistent with Saez (2010), we find that bunching occurs only among filers with self-employment income. Specifically, filers without children and married filers with three or fewer children exhibit significant bunching. Analysis of tax data linked to labor supply measures from the American Community Survey, however, suggests that this bunching likely reflects a change in reported income rather than a change in true labor supply. We find no evidence that wage and salary workers adjust their labor supply in response to increased availability of directly purchased health insurance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Upstream, Downstream: Diffusion and Impacts of the Universal Product Code

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-66R

    We study the adoption, diffusion, and impacts of the Universal Product Code (UPC) between 1975 and 1992, during the initial years of the barcode system. We find evidence of network effects in the diffusion process. Matched-sample difference-in-difference estimates show that firm size and trademark registrations increase following UPC adoption by manufacturers. Industry-level import penetration also increases with domestic UPC adoption. Our findings suggest that barcodes, scanning, and related technologies helped stimulate variety-enhancing product innovation and encourage the growth of international retail supply chains.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Local Productivity Spillovers from Science

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-56

    We estimate the local productivity spillovers from science by relating wages and real estate prices across metros to measures of scienti c activity in those metros. We address three fundamental challenges: (1) factor input adjustments using wages and real estate prices, along with Shepards Lemma, to estimate changes metros' productivity, which must equal changes in unit production cost; (2) unobserved differences in metros/causality using a share shift index that exploits historic variation in the mix of research in metros interacted with trends in federal funding for specific fields as an instrument; (3) unobserved differences in workers using data on the states in which people are born. Our estimates show a strong positive relationship between wages and scientifc research and a weak positive relationship for real estate prices. Overall, we estimate high rate of return to research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Sorting Between and Within Industries: A Testable Model of Assortative Matching

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-43

    We test Shimer's (2005) theory of the sorting of workers between and within industrial sectors based on directed search with coordination frictions, deliberately maintaining its static general equilibrium framework. We fit the model to sector-specific wage, vacancy and output data, including publicly-available statistics that characterize the distribution of worker and employer wage heterogeneity across sectors. Our empirical method is general and can be applied to a broad class of assignment models. The results indicate that industries are the loci of sorting-more productive workers are employed in more productive industries. The evidence confirm that strong assortative matching can be present even when worker and employer components of wage heterogeneity are weakly correlated.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Drives Differences in Management?

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-32

    Partnering with the Census we implement a new survey of 'structured' management practices in 32,000 US manufacturing plants. We find an enormous dispersion of management practices across plants, with 40% of this variation across plants within the same firm. This management variation accounts for about a fifth of the spread of productivity, a similar fraction as that accounted for by R&D and twice as much as explained by IT. We find evidence for four 'drivers' of management: competition, business environment, learning spillovers and human capital. Collectively, these drivers account for about a third of the dispersion of structured management practices.
    View Full Paper PDF