CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'W-2'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 59

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 47

American Community Survey - 45

Protected Identification Key - 41

Social Security Number - 39

Social Security Administration - 37

Social Security - 33

Current Population Survey - 27

Employer Identification Numbers - 27

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 21

Longitudinal Business Database - 20

Disclosure Review Board - 20

Person Validation System - 19

Decennial Census - 18

North American Industry Classification System - 18

Adjusted Gross Income - 17

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 13

Business Register - 13

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 13

Earned Income Tax Credit - 13

Ordinary Least Squares - 12

National Science Foundation - 12

Census Numident - 11

2010 Census - 10

Master Address File - 10

Census Bureau Business Register - 10

Housing and Urban Development - 9

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 9

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 9

Detailed Earnings Records - 9

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 8

PSID - 8

National Bureau of Economic Research - 8

SSA Numident - 7

COVID-19 - 7

CPS ASEC - 7

Opportunity Atlas - 7

Center for Economic Studies - 7

Personally Identifiable Information - 7

MAF-ARF - 7

Census Household Composition Key - 6

Person Identification Validation System - 6

Harvard University - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 6

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Disability Insurance - 6

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 6

Data Management System - 6

ASEC - 6

General Accounting Office - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

Master Beneficiary Record - 5

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 5

National Center for Health Statistics - 5

County Business Patterns - 5

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 5

MTO - 4

Federal Reserve Bank - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

Cornell University - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Administrative Records - 4

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

Research Data Center - 4

Federal Reserve System - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

Unemployment Insurance - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

Legal Form of Organization - 3

Department of Labor - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

Economic Census - 3

COVID - 3

Service Annual Survey - 3

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 3

Postal Service - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Census 2000 - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

earnings - 22

labor - 19

employed - 19

recession - 19

socioeconomic - 18

earner - 17

employ - 17

poverty - 16

ethnicity - 16

intergenerational - 15

population - 15

disadvantaged - 14

workforce - 13

irs - 13

tax - 13

survey - 12

race - 12

family - 12

salary - 12

welfare - 11

racial - 11

minority - 10

payroll - 10

ethnic - 10

segregation - 9

earn - 9

respondent - 9

entrepreneur - 9

entrepreneurship - 9

disparity - 9

taxpayer - 9

1040 - 9

unemployed - 9

generation - 8

neighborhood - 8

hispanic - 8

heterogeneity - 8

immigrant - 8

housing - 7

census bureau - 7

mobility - 7

poorer - 7

income data - 7

retirement - 7

employee - 7

wealth - 6

job - 6

estimating - 6

hiring - 6

economist - 6

proprietor - 6

child - 6

medicaid - 6

opportunity - 5

parents income - 5

enterprise - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

parent - 5

native - 5

longitudinal - 5

dependent - 5

expenditure - 5

agency - 5

survey income - 5

assessed - 5

income white - 5

statistical - 5

funding - 5

venture - 5

migrant - 5

immigration - 5

economically - 4

residential - 4

rent - 4

estimates intergenerational - 4

occupation - 4

fertility - 4

career - 4

bias - 4

sampling - 4

household surveys - 4

earns - 4

parental - 4

trend - 4

eligibility - 4

incentive - 4

data - 4

census data - 4

citizen - 4

segregated - 4

income children - 4

discrimination - 4

percentile - 4

white - 4

filing - 4

black - 4

migration - 4

rural - 3

residence - 3

educated - 3

enrollment - 3

schooling - 3

adulthood - 3

adoption - 3

grandparent - 3

graduate - 3

proprietorship - 3

indian - 3

worker - 3

eligible - 3

taxable - 3

revenue - 3

data census - 3

survey households - 3

propensity - 3

income survey - 3

recessionary - 3

decade - 3

researcher - 3

earnings inequality - 3

imputation - 3

family income - 3

regress - 3

migrate - 3

quarterly - 3

census use - 3

corporation - 3

founder - 3

increase employment - 3

assimilation - 3

earnings mobility - 3

ssa - 3

employment wages - 3

cohort - 3

econometric - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 73 of 73


  • Working Paper

    Estimating Measurement Error in SIPP Annual Job Earnings: A Comparison of Census Bureau Survey and SSA Administrative Data

    July 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-20

    We quantify sources of variation in annual job earnings data collected by the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to determine how much of the variation is the result of measurement error. Jobs reported in the SIPP are linked to jobs reported in an administrative database, the Detailed Earnings Records (DER) drawn from the Social Security Administration's Master Earnings File, a universe file of all earnings reported on W-2 tax forms. As a result of the match, each job potentially has two earnings observations per year: survey and administrative. Unlike previous validation studies, both of these earnings measures are viewed as noisy measures of some underlying true amount of annual earnings. While the existence of survey error resulting from respondent mistakes or misinterpretation is widely accepted, the idea that administrative data are also error-prone is new. Possible sources of employer reporting error, employee under-reporting of compensation such as tips, and general differences between how earnings may be reported on tax forms and in surveys, necessitates the discarding of the assumption that administrative data are a true measure of the quantity that the survey was designed to collect. In addition, errors in matching SIPP and DER jobs, a necessary task in any use of administrative data, also contribute to measurement error in both earnings variables. We begin by comparing SIPP and DER earnings for different demographic and education groups of SIPP respondents. We also calculate different measures of changes in earnings for individuals switching jobs. We estimate a standard earnings equation model using SIPP and DER earnings and compare the resulting coefficients. Finally exploiting the presence of individuals with multiple jobs and shared employers over time, we estimate an econometric model that includes random person and firm effects, a common error component shared by SIPP and DER earnings, and two independent error components that represent the variation unique to each earnings measure. We compare the variance components from this model and consider how the DER and SIPP differ across unobservable components.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Access Methods for United States Microdata

    August 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-25

    Beyond the traditional methods of tabulations and public-use microdata samples, statistical agencies have developed four key alternatives for providing non-government researchers with access to confidential microdata to improve statistical modeling. The first, licensing, allows qualified researchers access to confidential microdata at their own facilities, provided certain security requirements are met. The second, statistical data enclaves, offer qualified researchers restricted access to confidential economic and demographic data at specific agency-controlled locations. Third, statistical agencies can offer remote access, through a computer interface, to the confidential data under automated or manual controls. Fourth, synthetic data developed from the original data but retaining the correlations in the original data have the potential for allowing a wide range of analyses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the Relationship between Employer-Provided Health Insurance, Worker Mobility, and Wages

    September 2002

    Authors: Martha Stinson

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2002-23

    In this paper, a joint model of wages, hazard of a job ending, and probability of holding employer-provided health insurance is estimated, taking account of unobservable person and job characteristics. A unique data source, the 1990 and 1996 SIPP Panels linked to SSA administrative job histories, enables the identification of random person and job effects and the correlation of these effects across the three equations. The explicit modeling of this correlation produces consistent estimates of the effect of tenure on wages and the effect of health insurance on mobility. Substantial levels of job-lock and significant annual returns to seniority are found. Increasing the job-specific probability of obtaining employerprovided health insurance from 60% to 63%, or increasing the job-specific hourly wage rate by $.80, are both associated with an equivalent decrease in the hazard of the job ending. However, the dollar value of the wage benefit is substantially higher.
    View Full Paper PDF