CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'National Science Foundation'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 110

Longitudinal Business Database - 106

North American Industry Classification System - 101

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 96

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 92

Standard Industrial Classification - 86

National Bureau of Economic Research - 82

Ordinary Least Squares - 80

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 72

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 69

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 65

Internal Revenue Service - 65

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 65

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 65

Current Population Survey - 61

American Community Survey - 60

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 57

Total Factor Productivity - 55

Census of Manufactures - 55

Longitudinal Research Database - 55

Cornell University - 53

Special Sworn Status - 50

Disclosure Review Board - 47

Economic Census - 47

Social Security Administration - 46

Research Data Center - 46

Federal Reserve Bank - 45

Employer Identification Numbers - 43

Decennial Census - 42

International Trade Research Report - 42

Business Register - 40

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 39

University of Chicago - 31

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 31

Census Bureau Business Register - 29

Social Security - 29

County Business Patterns - 27

National Institute on Aging - 27

Protected Identification Key - 26

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 26

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 25

Social Security Number - 25

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 24

Unemployment Insurance - 24

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 24

American Economic Association - 24

Service Annual Survey - 24

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 24

Patent and Trademark Office - 23

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 22

American Economic Review - 21

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 20

Federal Reserve System - 19

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 19

Sloan Foundation - 19

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 19

LEHD Program - 19

Business Dynamics Statistics - 18

Department of Labor - 18

Cobb-Douglas - 18

Kauffman Foundation - 18

Journal of Economic Literature - 18

Harmonized System - 17

World Bank - 17

American Statistical Association - 17

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 16

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 16

PSID - 15

2010 Census - 15

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

University of Michigan - 15

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 15

University of Maryland - 15

Generalized Method of Moments - 14

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 13

Harvard University - 13

Individual Characteristics File - 13

Department of Commerce - 13

Technical Services - 12

W-2 - 12

National Institutes of Health - 12

Department of Economics - 12

Survey of Business Owners - 12

Core Based Statistical Area - 12

Postal Service - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

AKM - 12

Journal of Political Economy - 12

New York University - 11

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 11

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 11

Labor Productivity - 11

United States Census Bureau - 11

Review of Economics and Statistics - 11

Public Use Micro Sample - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 10

UC Berkeley - 10

Small Business Administration - 10

Duke University - 10

Master Address File - 10

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 10

Employment History File - 10

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 10

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 10

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 9

Minnesota Population Center - 9

Yale University - 9

Department of Education - 9

National Center for Health Statistics - 9

Person Validation System - 9

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 9

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 9

2SLS - 9

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 9

Stanford University - 9

Securities and Exchange Commission - 9

Employer-Household Dynamics - 9

Employer Characteristics File - 9

Local Employment Dynamics - 9

Office of Personnel Management - 9

European Union - 9

Company Organization Survey - 9

North American Free Trade Agreement - 9

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 9

North American Industry Classi - 9

Permanent Plant Number - 9

Boston Research Data Center - 9

Office of Management and Budget - 8

Department of Energy - 8

State Energy Data System - 8

Foreign Direct Investment - 8

Federal Trade Commission - 8

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

World Trade Organization - 8

University of Toronto - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

National Academy of Sciences - 8

Statistics Canada - 8

COMPUSTAT - 8

University of California Los Angeles - 8

Chicago RDC - 8

University of Minnesota - 8

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 8

Initial Public Offering - 7

Board of Governors - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 7

Annual Business Survey - 7

Research and Development - 7

Department of Justice - 7

Review of Economic Studies - 7

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 7

BLS Handbook of Methods - 7

United Nations - 7

Census 2000 - 7

Business Register Bridge - 7

Center for Research in Security Prices - 7

Commodity Flow Survey - 7

Georgetown University - 7

MIT Press - 7

New York Times - 7

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 7

Detailed Earnings Records - 6

Columbia University - 6

NBER Summer Institute - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Heckscher-Ohlin - 6

1940 Census - 6

Occupational Employment Statistics - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Princeton University Press - 6

National Research Council - 6

Retail Trade - 6

Cambridge University Press - 6

European Commission - 6

International Trade Commission - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

Journal of International Economics - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

MTO - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Professional Services - 5

Data Management System - 5

Net Present Value - 5

Indian Health Service - 5

Regional Economic Information System - 5

George Mason University - 5

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

CDF - 5

Cumulative Density Function - 5

Computer Network Use Supplement - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Kauffman Firm Survey - 5

Housing and Urban Development - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Business Master File - 5

CAAA - 5

IQR - 5

Securities Data Company - 5

International Standard Industrial Classification - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

IZA - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Energy Information Administration - 5

Social Security Disability Insurance - 5

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 5

PAOC - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 4

Adjusted Gross Income - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

Value Added - 4

Public Administration - 4

Toxics Release Inventory - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Princeton University - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Census Numident - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Successor Predecessor File - 4

Boston College - 4

Disability Insurance - 4

Federal Government - 4

Brookings Institution - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

Federal Register - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

TFPQ - 4

Customs and Border Protection - 4

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

Ohio State University - 4

Washington University - 4

Business Services - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

WECD - 4

Supreme Court - 3

ASEC - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

DOB - 3

Educational Services - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Department of Health and Human Services - 3

HHS - 3

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

General Education Development - 3

TFPR - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

National Health Interview Survey - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Sample Edited Detail File - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Insurance Information Institute - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Urban Institute - 3

Schools Under Registration Review - 3

John M. Abowd - 30

Lars Vilhuber - 19

Peter Schott - 17

Kevin L. McKinney - 17

Lucia Foster - 14

Andrew Bernard - 14

Stephen Redding - 13

John Haltiwanger - 13

William Kerr - 11

Julia I. Lane - 9

Richard Burkhauser - 9

J. Bradford Jensen - 9

Catherine Buffington - 8

Nicholas Bloom - 8

Ron Jarmin - 8

Jeff Larrimore - 8

Nathan Goldschlag - 7

Ian M. Schmutte - 7

Javier Miranda - 6

Steven J. Davis - 6

Scott Ohlmacher - 6

Cheryl Grim - 6

Thomas Kemeny - 6

Abigail Cooke - 6

Shuaizhang Feng - 6

Wayne B Gray - 6

Paul A. Lengermann - 6

Erik Brynjolfsson - 5

Nikolas Zolas - 5

Jerome P. Reiter - 5

Joshua Drucker - 5

Ronald J Shadbegian - 5

Joseph Staudt - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Timothy R. Wojan - 4

Reed Walker - 4

Garrett Anstreicher - 4

J. David Brown - 4

John S. Earle - 4

Mee Jung Kim - 4

Kyung Min Lee - 4

Itay Saporta-Eksten - 4

Tania Babina - 4

Daniel Weinberg - 4

Rebecca Zarutskie - 4

Gordon M Phillips - 4

Edward Glaeser - 4

Simon Woodcock - 4

Chad Syverson - 4

Justin Pierce - 4

Stephen Jenkins - 4

James D Adams - 4

Nathaniel Hendren - 3

Zachary Kroff - 3

Richard Mansfield - 3

Sonya R. Porter - 3

Emin Dinlersoz - 3

James Tybout - 3

Mark J. Kutzbach - 3

James Davis - 3

Andrew S. Green - 3

Paige Ouimet - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Kristin McCue - 3

Bruce Weinberg - 3

Francis Kramarz - 3

David L. Rigby - 3

Carolyn A. Liebler - 3

Fredrik Andersson - 3

Bryce Stephens - 3

Vojislav Maksimovic - 3

Charles Tolbert - 3

Troy Blanchard - 3

Thomas J Holmes - 3

Ali Hortacsu - 3

Yoonsoo Lee - 3

Edward Feser - 3

Timothy Dunne - 3

Timothy Bates - 3

Donald Siegel - 3

Frank R Lichtenberg - 3

econometric - 73

employ - 66

workforce - 66

production - 63

manufacturing - 62

industrial - 58

employed - 58

labor - 58

growth - 54

earnings - 54

innovation - 50

economist - 49

macroeconomic - 49

estimating - 49

employee - 49

investment - 47

survey - 47

market - 45

company - 45

expenditure - 44

recession - 44

sale - 39

statistical - 39

payroll - 39

entrepreneurship - 37

enterprise - 37

data - 36

export - 36

sector - 34

produce - 31

gdp - 30

revenue - 30

patent - 29

entrepreneur - 29

population - 29

technological - 29

agency - 29

endogeneity - 29

quarterly - 28

economically - 28

census bureau - 26

research - 26

report - 26

respondent - 25

worker - 25

demand - 24

salary - 24

researcher - 24

heterogeneity - 24

acquisition - 23

patenting - 23

metropolitan - 23

estimation - 22

finance - 22

ethnicity - 22

innovative - 22

organizational - 22

import - 22

entrepreneurial - 21

establishment - 21

immigrant - 21

merger - 20

minority - 20

microdata - 20

data census - 20

efficiency - 20

census research - 20

hiring - 19

earner - 19

venture - 19

manufacturer - 19

innovate - 19

exporter - 19

hispanic - 18

aggregate - 18

multinational - 18

employment growth - 18

analysis - 18

study - 18

invention - 17

technology - 17

factory - 17

economic census - 17

research census - 17

financial - 16

housing - 16

spillover - 16

disclosure - 16

ethnic - 16

geographically - 16

profit - 16

occupation - 16

employer household - 16

longitudinal - 16

regional - 16

statistician - 16

regulation - 16

inventory - 15

product - 15

unemployed - 15

incentive - 15

trend - 15

census data - 15

accounting - 14

neighborhood - 14

poverty - 14

residence - 14

rent - 14

datasets - 14

employing - 14

immigration - 14

econometrician - 14

tariff - 14

segregation - 13

disparity - 13

corporation - 13

productivity growth - 13

depreciation - 13

trading - 13

record - 13

emission - 13

pollution - 13

resident - 13

cost - 13

employment statistics - 13

employee data - 13

workplace - 13

innovating - 12

earn - 12

disadvantaged - 12

race - 12

investor - 12

profitability - 12

innovator - 12

confidentiality - 12

leverage - 12

socioeconomic - 12

migrant - 12

longitudinal employer - 12

employment dynamics - 12

monopolistic - 12

industry productivity - 12

corporate - 12

specialization - 11

estimator - 11

average - 11

racial - 11

productive - 11

international trade - 11

job - 11

custom - 11

privacy - 11

environmental - 11

endogenous - 11

price - 11

census employment - 11

subsidiary - 11

percentile - 11

database - 11

epa - 11

regulatory - 11

region - 11

debt - 10

invest - 10

development - 10

exporting - 10

importer - 10

pollutant - 10

tax - 10

residential - 10

state - 10

pricing - 10

competitor - 10

native - 10

financing - 10

bankruptcy - 10

incorporated - 10

shipment - 10

employment estimates - 10

imputation - 10

labor statistics - 10

tenure - 10

proprietorship - 10

aging - 10

developed - 9

exogeneity - 9

employment earnings - 9

discrimination - 9

wholesale - 9

migration - 9

black - 9

regional economic - 9

polluting - 9

capital - 9

area - 9

regression - 9

loan - 8

midwest - 8

relocation - 8

firm innovation - 8

innovation productivity - 8

stock - 8

strategic - 8

foreign - 8

firms export - 8

hire - 8

firms trade - 8

geographic - 8

producing - 8

founder - 8

workers earnings - 8

layoff - 8

rural - 8

diversification - 8

welfare - 8

compensation - 8

consumer - 8

exported - 8

mexican - 8

management - 8

estimates employment - 8

information - 8

takeover - 8

statistical agencies - 8

patented - 7

innovation patenting - 7

institutional - 7

segregated - 7

survey data - 7

ssa - 7

renter - 7

investing - 7

prospect - 7

firm patenting - 7

shift - 7

public - 7

publicly - 7

ownership - 7

acquirer - 7

enrollment - 7

city - 7

bias - 7

refugee - 7

commodity - 7

good - 7

funding - 7

latino - 7

employment count - 7

migrating - 7

labor markets - 7

earnings age - 7

impact - 7

censuses surveys - 7

importing - 7

managerial - 7

yearly - 7

mobility - 7

turnover - 7

imported - 7

manager - 7

externality - 7

environmental regulation - 7

agglomeration - 7

estimates productivity - 7

plant productivity - 7

bank - 6

opportunity - 6

associate - 6

suburb - 6

intergenerational - 6

firms patents - 6

factor productivity - 6

globalization - 6

security - 6

wealth - 6

employment wages - 6

recessionary - 6

industry concentration - 6

industry variation - 6

work census - 6

workforce indicators - 6

corp - 6

migrate - 6

white - 6

retirement - 6

disability - 6

trade models - 6

earnings workers - 6

census survey - 6

firms exporting - 6

reporting - 6

firms census - 6

business data - 6

use census - 6

employment data - 6

department - 6

wage data - 6

geography - 6

oligopoly - 6

productivity firms - 6

aggregation - 6

firms productivity - 6

census business - 6

consumption - 6

restructuring - 6

agglomeration economies - 6

regional industry - 6

refinery - 6

plants industry - 6

income data - 6

paper census - 6

borrowing - 5

contract - 5

educated - 5

earns - 5

urbanization - 5

sample - 5

lending - 5

productivity impacts - 5

growth productivity - 5

rates productivity - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

trader - 5

sectoral - 5

insurance - 5

relocate - 5

unemployment rates - 5

schooling - 5

competitiveness - 5

advantage - 5

worker demographics - 5

regress - 5

moving - 5

technology adoption - 5

federal - 5

supplier - 5

buyer - 5

executive - 5

subsidy - 5

state employment - 5

indicator - 5

exogenous - 5

linked census - 5

spending - 5

ancestry - 5

neighbor - 5

productivity increases - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

income year - 5

inference - 5

model - 5

larger firms - 5

outsourcing - 5

heterogeneous - 5

unobserved - 5

reside - 5

liquidation - 5

conglomerate - 5

eligible - 5

industries estimate - 5

regional industries - 5

productivity plants - 5

regulation productivity - 5

locality - 5

plants industries - 5

income individuals - 5

productivity measures - 5

empirical - 5

equity - 4

fund - 4

university - 4

graduate - 4

earnings gap - 4

residential segregation - 4

2010 census - 4

borrower - 4

lender - 4

productivity estimates - 4

investment productivity - 4

patenting firms - 4

exporters multinationals - 4

firms import - 4

diversify - 4

estimates pollution - 4

home - 4

shock - 4

worker wages - 4

impact employment - 4

family - 4

marriage - 4

earnings growth - 4

saving - 4

substitute - 4

competitive - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

assessing - 4

regressing - 4

econometrically - 4

tech - 4

export market - 4

asian - 4

startup - 4

startup firms - 4

productivity wage - 4

younger firms - 4

measures employment - 4

employment measures - 4

shareholder - 4

productivity dispersion - 4

decline - 4

rates employment - 4

social - 4

census use - 4

clerical - 4

bankrupt - 4

productivity size - 4

rate - 4

productivity analysis - 4

practices productivity - 4

outsourced - 4

economic growth - 4

sourcing - 4

poorer - 4

foreign trade - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

budget - 4

information census - 4

commerce - 4

measure - 4

small firms - 4

income distributions - 4

exports firms - 4

eligibility - 4

oligopolistic - 4

wage changes - 4

prevalence - 4

profitable - 4

household income - 4

efficient - 4

pollution regulation - 4

plant - 4

creditor - 3

wage gap - 3

sampling - 3

population survey - 3

census disclosure - 3

credit - 3

grandparent - 3

patents firms - 3

productivity shocks - 3

wages productivity - 3

exporting firms - 3

multinational firms - 3

urban - 3

town - 3

employment effects - 3

taxation - 3

interracial - 3

employment distribution - 3

immigrant workers - 3

marketing - 3

recession exposure - 3

diversified - 3

crime - 3

risk - 3

technical - 3

industrialized - 3

trademark - 3

employment trends - 3

advancement - 3

policymakers - 3

banking - 3

assimilation - 3

decade - 3

forecast - 3

wages employment - 3

effect wages - 3

firms young - 3

volatility - 3

fiscal - 3

labor productivity - 3

wage growth - 3

linkage - 3

surveys censuses - 3

country - 3

policy - 3

classification - 3

classifying - 3

industry employment - 3

race census - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

irs - 3

imputation model - 3

proprietor - 3

wage variation - 3

autoregressive - 3

expense - 3

economic statistics - 3

restaurant - 3

growth firms - 3

agriculture - 3

agricultural - 3

growth employment - 3

electricity prices - 3

ethnically - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

firms plants - 3

residing - 3

coverage - 3

gain - 3

indian - 3

relocating - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

consolidated - 3

abatement expenditures - 3

yield - 3

district - 3

polluting industries - 3

impairment - 3

measures productivity - 3

employment production - 3

firms grow - 3

capital productivity - 3

wage regressions - 3

estimates production - 3

costs pollution - 3

pollution abatement - 3

census years - 3

wage industries - 3

household surveys - 3

analysis productivity - 3

regulated - 3

Viewing papers 71 through 80 of 334


  • Working Paper

    Are Customs Records Consistent Across Countries? Evidence from the U.S. and Colombia

    March 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-11

    In many countries, official customs records include identifying information on the exporting and importing firms involved in each shipment. This information allows researchers to study international business networks, offshoring patterns, and the micro-foundations of aggregate trade flows. It also provides the government with a basis for tariff assessments at the border. However, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure that the shipment-level information recorded by the exporting country is consistent with the shipment-level information recorded by the importing country. And to the extent that there are discrepancies, it is not clear how prevalent they are or what form they take. In this paper we explore these issues, both to enhance our understanding of the limitations of customs records, and to inform future discussions of possible revisions in the way they are collected. Specifically, we match U.S.-bound export shipments that appear in Colombian Customs records (DIAN) with their counterparts in the US Customs records (LFTTD): U.S. import shipments from Colombia. Several patterns emerge. First, differences in the coverage of the two countries customs records lead to significant discrepancies in the official bilateral trade flow statistics of these two countries: the DIAN database records 8 percent fewer transactions than the LFTTD database over the sample period, and the average export shipment size in the DIAN is roughly 4 percent smaller than the corresponding import shipment size in the LFTTD. These discrepancies are not due to difference in minimum shipment sizes and they are not particular to a few sectors, though they are more common among small shipments and they evolve over time. Second, if we rely exclusively on firms' names and addresses, ignoring other shipment characteristics (value, product code, etc.), we are able to match 85 percent of the value of U.S. imports from Colombia in our LFTTD sample with particular Colombian suppliers in the DIAN. Further, fully 97 percent of the value of Colombian exports to the U.S. can be mapped onto particular importers in the U.S. LFTTD. Third, however, match rates at the shipment level within buyer-seller pairs are low. That is, while buyers and sellers can be paired up fairly accurately, only 25-30 percent of the individual transactions in the customs records of the two countries can be matched using fuzzy algorithms at reasonable tolerance levels. Fourth, the manufacturer ID (MANUF_ID) that appears in the LFTTD implies there are roughly twice as many Colombian exporters as actually appear in the DIAN. And similar comments apply to an analogous MANUF_ID variable constructed from importer name and address information in the DIAN. Hence studies that treat each MANUF_ID value as a distinct firm are almost surely overstating the number of foreign firms that engage in trade with the U.S. by a substantial amount. Finally, we conclude that if countries were to require that exporters report standardized shipment identifiers'either invoice numbers or bill of lading/air waybill numbers'it would be far easier to track individual transactions and to identify international discrepancies in reporting.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Pay, Employment, and Dynamics of Young Firms

    July 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-23

    Why do young firms pay less? Using confidential microdata from the US Census Bureau, we find lower earnings among workers at young firms. However, we argue that such measurement is likely subject to worker and firm selection. Exploiting the two-sided panel nature of the data to control for relevant dimensions of worker and firm heterogeneity, we uncover a positive and significant young-firm pay premium. Furthermore, we show that worker selection at firm birth is related to future firm dynamics, including survival and growth. We tie our empirical findings to a simple model of pay, employment, and dynamics of young firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    MANAGING TRADE: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA AND THE US

    May 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-15

    We present a heterogeneous-firm model in which management ability increases both production efficiency and product quality. Combining six micro-datasets on management practices, production and trade in Chinese and American firms, we find broad support for the model's predictions. First, better managed firms are more likely to export, sell more products to more destination countries, and earn higher export revenues and profits. Second, better managed exporters have higher prices, higher quality, and lower quality-adjusted prices. Finally, they also use a wider range of inputs, higher quality and more expensive inputs, and imported inputs from more advanced countries. The structural estimates indicate that management is important for improving production efficiency and product quality in both countries, but it matters more in China than in the US, especially for product quality. Panel analysis for the US and a randomized control trial in India suggest that management exerts causal effects on product quality, production efficiency, and exports. Poor management practices may thus hinder trade and growth, especially in developing countries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Why the Economics Profession Must Actively Participate in the Privacy Protection Debate

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-09

    When Google or the U.S. Census Bureau publish detailed statistics on browsing habits or neighborhood characteristics, some privacy is lost for everybody while supplying public information. To date, economists have not focused on the privacy loss inherent in data publication. In their stead, these issues have been advanced almost exclusively by computer scientists who are primarily interested in technical problems associated with protecting privacy. Economists should join the discussion, first, to determine where to balance privacy protection against data quality; a social choice problem. Furthermore, economists must ensure new privacy models preserve the validity of public data for economic research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Optimal Probabilistic Record Linkage: Best Practice for Linking Employers in Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-08

    This paper illustrates an application of record linkage between a household-level survey and an establishment-level frame in the absence of unique identifiers. Linkage between frames in this setting is challenging because the distribution of employment across firms is highly asymmetric. To address these difficulties, this paper uses a supervised machine learning model to probabilistically link survey respondents in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with employers and establishments in the Census Business Register (BR) to create a new data source which we call the CenHRS. Multiple imputation is used to propagate uncertainty from the linkage step into subsequent analyses of the linked data. The linked data reveal new evidence that survey respondents' misreporting and selective nonresponse about employer characteristics are systematically correlated with wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IMMIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS AND INNOVATION IN THE U.S. HIGH-TECH SECTOR

    February 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-06

    We estimate differences in innovation behavior between foreign versus U.S.-born entrepreneurs in high-tech industries. Our data come from the Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs, a random sample of firms with detailed information on owner characteristics and innovation activities. We find uniformly higher rates of innovation in immigrant-owned firms for 15 of 16 different innovation measures; the only exception is for copyright/trademark. The immigrant advantage holds for older firms as well as for recent start-ups and for every level of the entrepreneur's education. The size of the estimated immigrant-native differences in product and process innovation activities rises with detailed controls for demographic and human capital characteristics but falls for R&D and patenting. Controlling for finance, motivations, and industry reduces all coefficients, but for most measures and specifications immigrants are estimated to have a sizable advantage in innovation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing

    December 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-51

    The U.S. Census Bureau partnered with a team of external researchers to conduct the first-ever large-scale survey of management practices in the United States, the Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS), for reference year 2010. With the help of the research team, the Census Bureau expanded and improved the survey for a second wave for reference year 2015. The MOPS is a supplement to the Annual Survey of Manufacturing (ASM), and so the collection and processing strategy for the MOPS built on the methodology for the ASM, while differing on key dimensions to address the unique nature of management relative to other business data. This paper provides detail on the mail strategy pursued for the MOPS, the collection methods for paper and electronic responses, the processing and estimation procedures, and the official Census Bureau data releases. This detail is useful for all those who have interest in using the MOPS for research purposes, those wishing to understand the MOPS data more deeply, and those with an interest in survey methodology.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Development of Survey Questions on Robotics Expenditures and Use in U.S. Manufacturing Establishments

    October 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-44

    The U.S. Census Bureau in partnership with a team of external researchers developed a series of questions on the use of robotics in U.S. manufacturing establishments. The questions include: (1) capital expenditures for new and used industrial robotic equipment in 2018, (2) number of industrial robots in operation in 2018, and (3) number of industrial robots purchased in 2018. These questions are to be included in the 2018 Annual Survey of Manufactures. This paper documents the background and cognitive testing process used for the development of these questions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Opportunity Atlas: Mapping the Childhood Roots of Social Mobility

    September 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-42R

    We construct a publicly available atlas of children's outcomes in adulthood by Census tract using anonymized longitudinal data covering nearly the entire U.S. population. For each tract, we estimate children's earnings distributions, incarceration rates, and other outcomes in adulthood by parental income, race, and gender. These estimates allow us to trace the roots of outcomes such as poverty and incarceration back to the neighborhoods in which children grew up. We find that children's outcomes vary sharply across nearby tracts: for children of parents at the 25th percentile of the income distribution, the standard deviation of mean household income at age 35 is $4,200 across tracts within counties. We illustrate how these tract-level data can provide insight into how neighborhoods shape the development of human capital and support local economic policy using two applications. First, we show that the estimates permit precise targeting of policies to improve economic opportunity by uncovering specific neighborhoods where certain subgroups of children grow up to have poor outcomes. Neighborhoods matter at a very granular level: conditional on characteristics such as poverty rates in a child's own Census tract, characteristics of tracts that are one mile away have little predictive power for a child's outcomes. Our historical estimates are informative predictors of outcomes even for children growing up today because neighborhood conditions are relatively stable over time. Second, we show that the observational estimates are highly predictive of neighborhoods' causal effects, based on a comparison to data from the Moving to Opportunity experiment and a quasi-experimental research design analyzing movers' outcomes. We then identify high-opportunity neighborhoods that are affordable to low-income families, providing an input into the design of affordable housing policies. Our measures of children's long-term outcomes are only weakly correlated with traditional proxies for local economic success such as rates of job growth, showing that the conditions that create greater upward mobility are not necessarily the same as those that lead to productive labor markets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure S2014 files in the FSRDC

    September 2018

    Authors: Lars Vilhuber

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-27R

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, maintains a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2014 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's secure and restricted-access Research Data Center network. The document attempts to provide a comprehensive description of all researcher-accessible files, of their creation, and of any modifications made to the files to facilitate researcher access.
    View Full Paper PDF