CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Federal Statistical Research Data Center'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 134

North American Industry Classification System - 95

Longitudinal Business Database - 93

Disclosure Review Board - 77

Center for Economic Studies - 61

National Science Foundation - 57

American Community Survey - 54

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 53

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 46

National Bureau of Economic Research - 44

Internal Revenue Service - 38

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 37

Current Population Survey - 35

Economic Census - 34

Employer Identification Numbers - 33

Federal Reserve Bank - 33

Business Dynamics Statistics - 32

Standard Industrial Classification - 32

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 31

Decennial Census - 31

Census of Manufactures - 30

Social Security Administration - 30

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 28

Total Factor Productivity - 27

Protected Identification Key - 25

Business Register - 24

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 22

Research Data Center - 22

Census Bureau Business Register - 21

County Business Patterns - 21

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 21

Special Sworn Status - 19

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 17

Social Security Number - 16

Patent and Trademark Office - 15

Cobb-Douglas - 15

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 15

Department of Homeland Security - 15

Service Annual Survey - 14

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 14

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 13

Energy Information Administration - 13

Department of Economics - 13

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 13

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 13

Federal Reserve System - 12

Person Validation System - 12

Social Security - 12

International Trade Research Report - 12

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 11

University of Chicago - 11

COVID-19 - 11

Survey of Business Owners - 11

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 11

2010 Census - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 10

Unemployment Insurance - 10

Annual Business Survey - 10

United States Census Bureau - 10

University of Michigan - 10

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 9

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 9

Cornell University - 9

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 9

Small Business Administration - 9

Employment History File - 9

Retail Trade - 9

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 9

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 8

IQR - 8

Board of Governors - 8

Company Organization Survey - 8

Department of Labor - 8

World Trade Organization - 8

Generalized Method of Moments - 8

Housing and Urban Development - 8

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

Statistics Canada - 8

Postal Service - 8

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 8

Supreme Court - 7

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 7

Technical Services - 7

National Institutes of Health - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Office of Management and Budget - 7

National Institute on Aging - 7

European Union - 7

Department of Agriculture - 7

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 7

Wholesale Trade - 7

PSID - 7

State Energy Data System - 7

American Economic Association - 7

Sloan Foundation - 7

Accommodation and Food Services - 7

Kauffman Foundation - 7

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 7

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 6

Department of Energy - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

UC Berkeley - 6

W-2 - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Geographic Information Systems - 6

Russell Sage Foundation - 6

Harmonized System - 6

Professional Services - 6

University of Toronto - 6

National Establishment Time Series - 6

Duke University - 6

University of Maryland - 6

Boston College - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Master Address File - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Center for Research in Security Prices - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Initial Public Offering - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Occupational Employment Statistics - 5

Department of Education - 5

Federal Register - 5

Princeton University - 5

Longitudinal Research Database - 5

IBM - 5

NBER Summer Institute - 5

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 5

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 5

American Housing Survey - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

World Bank - 5

Characteristics of Business Owners - 5

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Nonemployer Statistics - 4

Yale University - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Commodity Flow Survey - 4

AKM - 4

Paycheck Protection Program - 4

IZA - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Social Science Research Institute - 4

Columbia University - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

TFPR - 4

TFPQ - 4

European Commission - 4

1940 Census - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Census Edited File - 4

Census Numident - 4

Data Management System - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Kauffman Firm Survey - 4

National Employer Survey - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Stanford University - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

United Nations - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Public Administration - 3

Penn State University - 3

New York University - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Business Register Bridge - 3

Retirement History Survey - 3

MAFID - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 3

National Research Council - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

Disability Insurance - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Federal Tax Information - 3

Educational Services - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

Guzman and Stern - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

HHS - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 3

MIT Press - 3

Journal of International Economics - 3

employ - 38

market - 32

innovation - 29

manufacturing - 29

labor - 29

recession - 29

employed - 28

workforce - 28

sector - 26

growth - 25

company - 24

survey - 24

patent - 23

investment - 23

industrial - 23

macroeconomic - 23

earnings - 23

econometric - 23

production - 21

gdp - 21

revenue - 21

enterprise - 21

employee - 21

sale - 20

estimating - 20

neighborhood - 20

economist - 19

expenditure - 19

population - 19

resident - 19

export - 19

economically - 18

respondent - 18

payroll - 18

demand - 17

financial - 17

entrepreneurship - 17

quarterly - 15

entrepreneur - 15

disclosure - 15

inventory - 14

patenting - 14

hiring - 14

statistical - 14

rural - 14

import - 14

report - 14

housing - 14

finance - 14

agency - 14

technological - 13

socioeconomic - 13

disparity - 13

census data - 13

census bureau - 13

data census - 13

minority - 13

metropolitan - 13

exporter - 13

incentive - 13

microdata - 13

innovative - 12

debt - 12

efficiency - 12

disadvantaged - 12

immigrant - 12

immigration - 12

venture - 11

innovate - 11

spillover - 11

importer - 11

produce - 11

hire - 11

invention - 10

acquisition - 10

earner - 10

incorporated - 10

ethnicity - 10

poverty - 10

hispanic - 10

investor - 10

rent - 10

residential - 10

monopolistic - 9

earn - 9

loan - 9

salary - 9

aggregate - 9

productivity growth - 9

corporation - 9

entrepreneurial - 9

segregation - 9

residence - 9

endogeneity - 9

organizational - 9

racial - 9

race - 9

trend - 8

job - 8

worker - 8

relocation - 8

borrowing - 8

record - 8

community - 8

consumption - 8

shipment - 8

exporting - 8

renter - 8

manufacturer - 8

developed - 8

profit - 8

employment growth - 8

research - 8

leverage - 8

city - 8

ethnic - 8

unemployed - 8

emission - 8

establishment - 8

use census - 8

wholesale - 8

data - 8

datasets - 8

innovation patenting - 7

exogeneity - 7

shift - 7

accounting - 7

equity - 7

enrollment - 7

welfare - 7

agriculture - 7

rurality - 7

multinational - 7

impact - 7

firms patents - 7

researcher - 7

urban - 7

energy - 7

discrimination - 7

home - 7

saving - 7

bankruptcy - 7

technology - 6

innovating - 6

patented - 6

fuel - 6

occupation - 6

creditor - 6

aggregate productivity - 6

percentile - 6

labor markets - 6

segregated - 6

suburb - 6

price - 6

firms export - 6

trading - 6

investing - 6

stock - 6

invest - 6

intergenerational - 6

estimation - 6

patents firms - 6

productive - 6

depreciation - 6

innovator - 6

patenting firms - 6

credit - 6

warehousing - 6

black - 6

heterogeneity - 6

electricity - 6

epa - 6

state - 6

geographically - 6

bias - 6

migrant - 6

research census - 6

renewable - 6

econometrically - 6

merger - 5

specialization - 5

bank - 5

borrow - 5

graduate - 5

average - 5

productivity measures - 5

database - 5

proprietor - 5

parent - 5

family - 5

parental - 5

country - 5

recessionary - 5

prevalence - 5

suburbanization - 5

importing - 5

exported - 5

trader - 5

sociology - 5

crime - 5

founder - 5

filing - 5

subsidy - 5

firm innovation - 5

firm patenting - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity shocks - 5

tax - 5

banking - 5

development - 5

outsourced - 5

monopolistically - 5

regional - 5

supplier - 5

census disclosure - 5

competitor - 5

wealth - 5

homeowner - 5

mortgage - 5

growth productivity - 5

analysis - 5

productivity dispersion - 5

externality - 5

2010 census - 5

economic census - 5

energy efficiency - 5

regulation - 5

federal - 5

confidentiality - 5

tenure - 5

energy prices - 5

employment statistics - 5

census research - 5

white - 5

retailer - 5

agricultural - 5

business data - 5

layoff - 4

relocate - 4

fund - 4

asset - 4

opportunity - 4

institutional - 4

measures productivity - 4

imputation - 4

information census - 4

corporate - 4

subsidiary - 4

labor statistics - 4

census employment - 4

proprietorship - 4

retirement - 4

benefit - 4

eligibility - 4

pandemic - 4

suburban - 4

gain - 4

good - 4

purchase - 4

sourcing - 4

town - 4

citizen - 4

postsecondary - 4

factor productivity - 4

innovation productivity - 4

shareholder - 4

lending - 4

lender - 4

employment dynamics - 4

growth employment - 4

product - 4

custom - 4

exporting firms - 4

sectoral - 4

tariff - 4

region - 4

labor productivity - 4

entry productivity - 4

ownership - 4

neighbor - 4

policymakers - 4

house - 4

cost - 4

census responses - 4

efficient - 4

regulatory - 4

enforcement - 4

statistician - 4

privacy - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

study - 4

irs - 4

regression - 4

mexican - 4

work census - 4

information - 4

merchandise - 4

census business - 4

censuses surveys - 4

census survey - 4

collateral - 4

reporting - 4

manager - 4

tech - 3

unemployment rates - 3

migration - 3

executive - 3

identifier - 3

eligible - 3

child - 3

schooling - 3

urbanization - 3

residential segregation - 3

urbanized - 3

consumer - 3

poorer - 3

commodity - 3

imported - 3

export market - 3

downstream - 3

effects employment - 3

wage earnings - 3

employment earnings - 3

earnings employees - 3

financing - 3

funding - 3

prospect - 3

profitability - 3

compensation - 3

wage growth - 3

shock - 3

geographic - 3

foreign - 3

globalization - 3

firms import - 3

multinational firms - 3

job growth - 3

employment trends - 3

location - 3

outsourcing - 3

productivity size - 3

practices productivity - 3

aggregation - 3

woman - 3

earnings age - 3

employment effects - 3

employing - 3

workers earnings - 3

impact employment - 3

taxation - 3

income households - 3

transition - 3

immigrant workers - 3

marketing - 3

recession exposure - 3

pricing - 3

firms census - 3

estimator - 3

industry concentration - 3

area - 3

customer - 3

policy - 3

utility - 3

plant productivity - 3

public - 3

publicly - 3

startup - 3

debtor - 3

worker demographics - 3

union - 3

electricity prices - 3

latino - 3

pollution - 3

pollutant - 3

amenity - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

employee data - 3

corp - 3

subsidized - 3

geography - 3

trademark - 3

productivity firms - 3

firms grow - 3

commerce - 3

retail - 3

business startups - 3

buyer - 3

linked census - 3

decade - 3

farm - 3

industry productivity - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

ancestry - 3

immigrant entrepreneurs - 3

businesses census - 3

divorced - 3

surveys censuses - 3

bankrupt - 3

Viewing papers 61 through 70 of 193


  • Working Paper

    Family Resources and Human Capital in Economic Downturns

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-15

    I study how recessions impact the human capital of young adults and how these effects vary over the parent income gradient. Using a novel confidential linked survey dataset from U.S. Census, I document that the negative effects of worse local unemployment shocks on educational attainment are strongly concentrated among middle-class children, with losses in parental home equity being potentially important mechanisms. To probe the aggregate implications of these findings and assess policy implications, I develop a model of selection into college and life-cycle earnings that comprises endogenous parental transfers for education, multiple schooling options, and uncertainty in post-graduation employment outcomes. Simulating a recession in the model produces a 'hollowing out the middle' in lifecycle earnings in the aggregate, and educational borrowing constraints play a key role in this result. Counterfactual policies to expand college access in response to the recession can mitigate these effects but struggle to be cost effective.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Good Dispersion, Bad Dispersion

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-13

    We document that most dispersion in marginal revenue products of inputs occurs across plants within firms rather than between firms. This is commonly thought to reflect misallocation: dispersion is 'bad.' However, we show that eliminating frictions hampering internal capital markets in a multi-plant firm model may in fact increase productivity dispersion and raise output: dispersion can be 'good.' This arises as firms optimally stagger investment activity across their plants over time to avoid raising costly external finance, instead relying on reallocating internal funds. The staggering in turn generates dispersion in marginal revenue products. We use U.S. Census data on multi-plant manufacturing firms to provide empirical evidence for the model mechanism and show a quantitatively important role for good dispersion. Since there is less scope for good dispersion in emerging economies, the difference in the degree of misallocation between emerging and developed economies looks more pronounced than previously thought.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Accounting for Trade Patterns

    February 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-07

    We develop a quantitative framework for decomposing trade patterns. We derive price indexes that determine comparative advantage and the aggregate cost of living. If firms and products are imperfect substitutes, we show that these price indexes depend on variety, average appeal (including quality), and the dispersion of appeal-adjusted prices. We show that they are only weakly related to standard empirical measures of average prices. We find that 40 percent of the cross-section variation in comparative advantage, and 90 percent of the time-series variation, is accounted for by variety and average appeal, with less than 10 percent attributed to average prices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Low-Wage Jobs, Foreign-Born Workers, and Firm Performance

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-05

    We examine how migrant workers impact firm performance using administrative data from the United States. Exploiting an unexpected change in firms' likelihood of securing low-wage workers through the H-2B visa program, we find limited crowd-out of other forms of employment and no impact on average pay at the firm. Yet, access to H-2B workers raises firms' annual revenues and survival likelihood. Our results are consistent with the notion that guest worker programs can help address labor shortages without inflicting large losses on incumbent workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census: Full Technical Report

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63R

    For the last half-century, it has been a common and accepted practice for statistical agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, to adopt different strategies to protect the confidentiality of aggregate tabular data products from those used to protect the individual records contained in publicly released microdata products. This strategy was premised on the assumption that the aggregation used to generate tabular data products made the resulting statistics inherently less disclosive than the microdata from which they were tabulated. Consistent with this common assumption, the 2010 Census of Population and Housing in the U.S. used different disclosure limitation rules for its tabular and microdata publications. This paper demonstrates that, in the context of disclosure limitation for the 2010 Census, the assumption that tabular data are inherently less disclosive than their underlying microdata is fundamentally flawed. The 2010 Census published more than 150 billion aggregate statistics in 180 table sets. Most of these tables were published at the most detailed geographic level'individual census blocks, which can have populations as small as one person. Using only 34 of the published table sets, we reconstructed microdata records including five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) from the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using only published data, an attacker using our methods can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. We further confirm, through reidentification studies, that an attacker can, within census blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with race and ethnicity different from the modal person on the census block) with 95% accuracy. Having shown the vulnerabilities inherent to the disclosure limitation methods used for the 2010 Census, we proceed to demonstrate that the more robust disclosure limitation framework used for the 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction. Finally, we show that available alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System would either fail to protect confidentiality, or would overly degrade the statistics' utility for the primary statutory use case: redrawing the boundaries of all of the nation's legislative and voting districts in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act. You are reading the full technical report. For the summary paper see https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.4a1ebf70.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Collaborative Micro-productivity Project: Establishment-Level Productivity Dataset, 1972-2020

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-65

    We describe the process for building the Collaborative Micro-productivity Project (CMP) microdata and calculating establishment-level productivity numbers. The documentation is for version 7 and the data cover the years 1972-2020. These data have been used in numerous research papers and are used to create the experimental public-use data product Dispersion Statistics on Productivity (DiSP).
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Outsourcing Dynamism

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-64

    This paper investigates the increasing importance of domestic outsourcing in U.S. manufacturing. Under domestic outsourcing, the agency is the employer of record for temporary workers, though they perform their tasks at the client business' premises. On a yearly basis, one in two manufacturing plants hires at least some of its workers through a temporary help agency. Furthermore, domestic outsourcing is becoming increasingly more important: the average share of revenue spent on such arrangements has gone up by 85 percent since 2006. We develop a methodology to transform reported expenses on temporary and leased workers into plant-level outsourced employment counts, using administrative data on the U.S. manufacturing sector. We find that domestic outsourcing is an important margin of adjustment that plants use to modify their workforce in response to productivity shocks. Plant-level outsourced employment adjusts more quickly and is twice as responsive as payroll employment. These micro implications have significant aggregate consequences. Without taking reallocations in outsourced employment into account, the measured pace at which jobs reallocate across workplaces is underestimated. On average, we omit the equivalent of 15 percent of payroll employment reallocations in each year. However, outsourced employment churns at a much higher rate compared to its payroll counterpart. Therefore, the omission of outsourced reallocations can rationalize 37 percent of the secular decline in the aggregate job reallocation rate. Lastly, the extent of mismeasurement varies with the business cycle; falling in downturns and increasing in upturns implying that the speed of economic recovery is underestimated.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63

    Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Local and National Concentration Trends in Jobs and Sales: The Role of Structural Transformation

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-59

    National U.S. industrial concentration rose between 1992-2017. Simultaneously, the Herfindhahl Index of local (six-digit-NAICS by county) employment concentration fell. This divergence between national and local employment concentration is due to structural transformation. Both sales and employment concentration rose within industry-by-county cells. But activity shifted from concentrated Manufacturing towards relatively un-concentrated Services. A stronger between-sector shift in employment relative to sales explains the fall in local employment concentration. Had sectoral employment shares remained at their 1992 levels, average local employment concentration would have risen by 9% by 2017 rather than falling by 7%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Output Market Power and Spatial Misallocation

    November 2023

    Authors: Santiago Franco

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-57

    Most product industries are local. In the U.S., firms selling goods and services to local consumers account for half of total sales and generate more than sixty percent of the nation's jobs. Competition in these industries occurs in local product markets: cities. I propose a theory of such competition in which firms have output market power. Spatial differences in local competition arise endogenously due to the spatial sorting of heterogeneous firms. The ability to charge higher markups induces more productive firms to overvalue locating in larger cities, leading to a misallocation of firms across space. The optimal policy incen tivizes productive firms to relocate to smaller cities, providing a rationale for commonly used place-based policies. I use U.S. Census establishment-level data to estimate markups and to structurally estimate the model. I document a significant heterogeneity in markups for local industries across U.S. cities. Cities in the top decile of the city-size distribution have a fifty percent lower markup than cities in the bottom decile. I use the estimated model to quantify the general equilibrium effects of place-based policies. Policies that remove markups and relocate firms to smaller cities yield sizable aggregate welfare gains.
    View Full Paper PDF