CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Internal Revenue Service'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 132

American Community Survey - 121

Social Security Administration - 120

Center for Economic Studies - 115

Longitudinal Business Database - 112

North American Industry Classification System - 110

Protected Identification Key - 108

Current Population Survey - 105

Employer Identification Numbers - 104

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 100

Social Security Number - 95

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 88

Social Security - 84

Business Register - 69

Disclosure Review Board - 66

National Science Foundation - 65

Decennial Census - 64

Ordinary Least Squares - 62

W-2 - 61

Standard Industrial Classification - 60

Person Validation System - 53

Economic Census - 53

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 52

National Bureau of Economic Research - 47

Census Bureau Business Register - 47

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 47

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 46

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 44

2010 Census - 42

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 42

Master Address File - 40

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 39

County Business Patterns - 37

Business Dynamics Statistics - 37

Person Identification Validation System - 35

Census of Manufactures - 33

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 33

Census Numident - 32

Research Data Center - 31

Service Annual Survey - 31

Characteristics of Business Owners - 30

Small Business Administration - 29

Adjusted Gross Income - 29

Federal Reserve Bank - 29

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 29

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 29

Office of Management and Budget - 28

Total Factor Productivity - 28

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 28

Longitudinal Research Database - 28

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 27

Unemployment Insurance - 27

Personally Identifiable Information - 27

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 24

Housing and Urban Development - 24

Postal Service - 24

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 23

University of Chicago - 23

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 22

Cornell University - 22

Special Sworn Status - 22

Department of Labor - 21

Earned Income Tax Credit - 21

Federal Reserve System - 21

National Center for Health Statistics - 21

Indian Health Service - 20

Company Organization Survey - 19

COVID-19 - 19

PSID - 19

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 18

Department of Homeland Security - 18

Data Management System - 17

SSA Numident - 17

Detailed Earnings Records - 17

Medicaid Services - 16

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 16

Individual Characteristics File - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 16

International Trade Research Report - 16

Administrative Records - 16

Survey of Business Owners - 15

Disability Insurance - 15

Census Household Composition Key - 15

Employer Characteristics File - 15

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 15

Department of Commerce - 15

Permanent Plant Number - 15

Social and Economic Supplement - 14

ASEC - 14

General Accounting Office - 14

Department of Education - 14

University of Maryland - 14

Core Based Statistical Area - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

National Institutes of Health - 13

Board of Governors - 13

Centers for Medicare - 13

Securities and Exchange Commission - 13

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Kauffman Foundation - 13

Census Bureau Master Address File - 12

Russell Sage Foundation - 12

University of Michigan - 12

Office of Personnel Management - 12

Patent and Trademark Office - 12

Stanford University - 12

Cobb-Douglas - 12

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Local Employment Dynamics - 12

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 12

Department of Economics - 12

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 12

American Economic Association - 12

MAFID - 11

Urban Institute - 11

New York University - 11

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 11

Composite Person Record - 11

MAF-ARF - 11

Federal Tax Information - 11

Retail Trade - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 11

CPS ASEC - 10

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

Form W-2 - 10

Supreme Court - 10

Some Other Race - 10

Business Employment Dynamics - 10

Employment History File - 10

Business Formation Statistics - 10

UC Berkeley - 10

Technical Services - 10

National Employer Survey - 10

LEHD Program - 10

Accommodation and Food Services - 10

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 10

Center for Administrative Records Research - 10

Master Beneficiary Record - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

Initial Public Offering - 10

Business Master File - 10

Department of Agriculture - 9

1940 Census - 9

Population Estimates Program - 9

Linear Probability Models - 9

DOB - 9

Environmental Protection Agency - 9

Boston College - 9

Center for Research in Security Prices - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Arts, Entertainment - 9

Department of Defense - 9

Indian Housing Information Center - 9

Selective Service System - 9

Review of Economics and Statistics - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

Yale University - 9

Bureau of Labor - 9

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 9

Limited Liability Company - 8

Multiple Worksite Report - 8

PIKed - 8

Survey of Consumer Finances - 8

Cumulative Density Function - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Census Edited File - 8

Duke University - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Public Administration - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

American Economic Review - 8

American Statistical Association - 8

Annual Business Survey - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

Wholesale Trade - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

CDF - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

Sloan Foundation - 7

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Harmonized System - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Master Earnings File - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Georgetown University - 7

Journal of Human Resources - 7

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

NBER Summer Institute - 6

Agriculture, Forestry - 6

Federal Poverty Level - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

2SLS - 6

Health and Retirement Study - 6

Columbia University - 6

Educational Services - 6

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Census 2000 - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

Census of Retail Trade - 6

Securities Data Company - 6

Federal Register - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Business Services - 5

AKM - 5

George Mason University - 5

World Trade Organization - 5

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 5

Guzman and Stern - 5

COVID - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

National Research Council - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Occupational Employment Statistics - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Health Care and Social Assistance - 5

HHS - 5

Paycheck Protection Program - 5

Department of State - 5

Kauffman Firm Survey - 5

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 5

CATI - 5

New York Times - 5

Regression Discontinuity Design - 5

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 5

Stern School of Business - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

CAAA - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Northwestern University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

WECD - 5

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 4

Professional Services - 4

University of Texas - 4

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 4

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 4

LODES - 4

Ohio State University - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Foreign Direct Investment - 4

IQR - 4

Federal Statistical System - 4

E32 - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

Summary Earnings Records - 4

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

MIT Press - 4

COMPUSTAT - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

World Bank - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Hypothesis 2 - 3

North American Free Trade Agreement - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Research and Development - 3

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

University of Toronto - 3

Food and Nutrition Service - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

General Social Survey - 3

IZA - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Federal Government - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

United Nations - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

European Union - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

TFPQ - 3

Journal of International Economics - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

John Voorheis - 22

Maggie R. Jones - 16

John Haltiwanger - 16

Martha Stinson - 15

Javier Miranda - 13

John M. Abowd - 12

Lucia Foster - 11

J. David Brown - 10

Ron Jarmin - 10

Emin Dinlersoz - 9

Leah R. Clark - 9

Alicia Robb - 9

Adela Luque - 8

Sonya R. Porter - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Timothy Bates - 8

Kevin Rinz - 7

Andrew Penner - 7

Christopher Goetz - 7

Randall Akee - 7

Thomas B. Foster - 7

Jonathan Eggleston - 7

Lars Vilhuber - 7

Danielle H. Sandler - 6

Kristin Sandusky - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Moises Yi - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 6

Quentin Brummet - 5

Emily Penner - 5

Mark J. Kutzbach - 5

Thurston Domina - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Jonathan Colmer - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Jerome P. Reiter - 5

Julia I. Lane - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Robert Fairlie - 5

Alfred R Nucci - 5

Ethan Krohn - 4

Henry Hyatt - 4

Ariel J. Binder - 4

Michelle Spiegel - 4

Paul Y. Yoo - 4

Joseph Staudt - 4

T. Kirk White - 4

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Mark Ellis - 4

Lee Fiorio - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Kendall Houghton - 4

Carl Lieberman - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Nathan Goldschlag - 4

Timothy Dunne - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Erika McEntarfer - 4

Fariha Kamal - 4

James M. Noon - 4

Shawn Klimek - 4

Cheryl Grim - 4

C.J. Krizan - 4

Thomas Chemmanur - 4

Charles Hokayem - 3

Ciyata Coleman - 3

Sanghun (Eric) Kim - 3

Krishnan Patel - 3

Dean Plueger - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

Andrew Keller - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Abigail Wozniak - 3

Liana Christin Landivar - 3

Paul Hanselman - 3

Andrew Foote - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Hubert P. Janicki - 3

James R. Spletzer - 3

Joshua Mitchell - 3

Adam Bee - 3

Sabrina T. Howell - 3

Veronika Penciakova - 3

Caroline Walker - 3

Leticia Fernandez - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Daniel Weinberg - 3

Deborah Wagner - 3

Paige Ouimet - 3

Richard Burkhauser - 3

Shuaizhang Feng - 3

Stephen Jenkins - 3

Jeff Larrimore - 3

Debarshi Nandy - 3

employed - 82

survey - 73

employ - 71

labor - 61

earnings - 61

respondent - 58

population - 55

recession - 55

irs - 52

workforce - 52

employee - 50

payroll - 47

enterprise - 47

entrepreneurship - 42

entrepreneur - 41

agency - 40

revenue - 39

census bureau - 39

disadvantaged - 37

tax - 36

ethnicity - 36

data - 36

econometric - 35

statistical - 35

census data - 35

estimating - 33

earner - 33

hispanic - 33

economist - 33

quarterly - 31

sale - 31

proprietorship - 31

minority - 30

socioeconomic - 30

data census - 30

disparity - 29

growth - 29

venture - 29

salary - 29

company - 29

sector - 28

expenditure - 28

record - 27

proprietor - 27

poverty - 27

establishment - 26

ethnic - 26

report - 26

macroeconomic - 26

1040 - 25

enrollment - 25

corporation - 25

entrepreneurial - 25

immigrant - 25

manufacturing - 24

filing - 23

resident - 23

residence - 23

microdata - 23

taxpayer - 22

racial - 21

gdp - 21

employment data - 21

worker - 21

federal - 20

incentive - 20

coverage - 20

residential - 20

market - 20

financial - 20

production - 20

datasets - 20

use census - 19

hiring - 19

welfare - 19

unemployed - 19

family - 18

imputation - 18

aggregate - 18

migrant - 18

disclosure - 18

incorporated - 18

industrial - 18

citizen - 18

assessed - 17

housing - 17

economically - 17

insurance - 17

medicaid - 17

intergenerational - 17

migration - 17

job - 17

longitudinal - 17

economic census - 17

estimation - 16

occupation - 16

earn - 16

race - 16

neighborhood - 15

census employment - 15

investment - 15

endogeneity - 15

acquisition - 15

wealth - 14

income data - 14

export - 14

trend - 14

state - 14

employment statistics - 14

ssa - 14

immigration - 14

eligibility - 13

segregation - 13

bias - 13

percentile - 13

database - 13

census survey - 13

black - 13

statistician - 13

eligible - 12

discrimination - 12

census use - 12

organizational - 12

corporate - 12

finance - 12

white - 12

enrolled - 12

merger - 12

employee data - 12

census research - 11

mobility - 11

debt - 11

opportunity - 11

environmental - 11

innovation - 11

analysis - 11

study - 11

retirement - 11

work census - 11

startup - 11

employment growth - 11

dependent - 11

impact - 11

employing - 11

researcher - 11

metropolitan - 11

ownership - 11

census records - 10

labor statistics - 10

spillover - 10

medicare - 10

generation - 10

rent - 10

migrate - 10

migrating - 10

matching - 10

borrower - 10

loan - 10

information census - 10

layoff - 10

child - 9

census business - 9

records census - 9

census responses - 9

linked census - 9

poorer - 9

lender - 9

relocation - 9

moving - 9

lending - 9

inventory - 9

efficiency - 9

accounting - 9

department - 9

employment dynamics - 9

subsidy - 9

bank - 9

confidentiality - 9

public - 9

heterogeneity - 9

exemption - 9

firms census - 9

multinational - 9

depreciation - 9

owned businesses - 9

produce - 9

decline - 8

2010 census - 8

education - 8

sampling - 8

enrollee - 8

shock - 8

econometrician - 8

household surveys - 8

leverage - 8

emission - 8

pollution - 8

taxable - 8

nonemployer businesses - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employment earnings - 8

employment estimates - 8

workplace - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

information - 8

parent - 8

survey income - 8

surveys censuses - 8

census household - 8

healthcare - 8

taxation - 8

business data - 8

shareholder - 8

estimates employment - 8

filed - 7

declining - 7

unemployment rates - 7

restaurant - 7

woman - 7

school - 7

mortality - 7

gender - 7

home - 7

renter - 7

mortgage - 7

profit - 7

earnings employees - 7

uninsured - 7

bankruptcy - 7

shift - 7

patent - 7

patenting - 7

pension - 7

associate - 7

research census - 7

provided census - 7

recessionary - 7

business startups - 7

native - 7

turnover - 7

employment trends - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

funding - 7

privacy - 7

publicly - 7

census years - 7

census linked - 7

parental - 7

tenure - 7

mexican - 7

poor - 7

insured - 7

health insurance - 7

retail - 7

demand - 7

employment wages - 7

state employment - 7

exporter - 7

founder - 7

investor - 7

owner - 7

business owners - 7

characteristics businesses - 7

aggregation - 7

profitability - 7

credit - 6

census disclosure - 6

rural - 6

schooling - 6

educational - 6

estimates census - 6

income households - 6

establishments data - 6

exogeneity - 6

regress - 6

fertility - 6

technological - 6

monopolistic - 6

prevalence - 6

productive - 6

reporting - 6

adoption - 6

graduate - 6

subsidiary - 6

identifier - 6

manufacturer - 6

wholesale - 6

worker demographics - 6

student - 6

income children - 6

banking - 6

warehousing - 6

segregated - 6

aging - 6

residing - 6

income distributions - 6

assessing - 6

race census - 6

workers earnings - 6

transition - 6

discrepancy - 6

survey data - 6

employer household - 6

foreign - 6

asian - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

businesses census - 6

clerical - 6

regional - 6

regression - 6

census file - 6

rates employment - 6

research - 6

statistical agencies - 6

minority business - 5

educated - 5

household income - 5

employment count - 5

wage earnings - 5

earnings workers - 5

employment firms - 5

policy - 5

geography - 5

estimates intergenerational - 5

creditor - 5

grandparent - 5

adopt - 5

trends employment - 5

borrowing - 5

family income - 5

parents income - 5

university - 5

earns - 5

productivity growth - 5

census 2020 - 5

country - 5

effects employment - 5

crime - 5

wages productivity - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

compensation - 5

income individuals - 5

expense - 5

geographic - 5

pollution exposure - 5

census estimates - 5

import - 5

pandemic - 5

income survey - 5

pollutant - 5

geographically - 5

hurricane - 5

saving - 5

retiree - 5

small firms - 5

prospect - 5

corp - 5

estimator - 5

insurance employer - 5

empirical - 5

employment measures - 5

yearly - 5

customer - 5

health - 5

exporting - 5

classified - 5

firms export - 5

employment unemployment - 5

franchising - 5

stock - 5

industry productivity - 5

relocating - 5

insurance coverage - 5

econometrically - 5

mandate - 4

average - 4

homeowner - 4

benefit - 4

income housing - 4

applicant - 4

college - 4

career - 4

adulthood - 4

linkage - 4

epa - 4

innovate - 4

innovative - 4

disability - 4

www census - 4

income white - 4

wage gap - 4

institutional - 4

earnings gap - 4

estimates productivity - 4

consolidated - 4

small businesses - 4

childcare - 4

invention - 4

region - 4

indian - 4

relocate - 4

hire - 4

grade - 4

affluent - 4

sample - 4

survey households - 4

population survey - 4

financing - 4

security - 4

exposure - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

available census - 4

maternal - 4

locality - 4

startup firms - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

earnings inequality - 4

competitor - 4

earnings mobility - 4

individuals census - 4

shipment - 4

trading - 4

exporting firms - 4

wage changes - 4

union - 4

employment recession - 4

franchise - 4

franchisor - 4

franchised businesses - 4

franchise establishments - 4

wage data - 4

business survival - 4

regulation - 4

takeover - 4

conglomerate - 4

discriminatory - 3

employment declines - 3

sample census - 3

endogenous - 3

policymakers - 3

grocery - 3

amenity - 3

liquidation - 3

unobserved - 3

borrow - 3

technology - 3

advancement - 3

measures productivity - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

employed census - 3

labor markets - 3

effect wages - 3

growth productivity - 3

employees startups - 3

startups employees - 3

area - 3

specialization - 3

agriculture - 3

fund - 3

consumption - 3

concentration - 3

tariff - 3

propensity - 3

neighbor - 3

latino - 3

firms size - 3

income year - 3

disaster - 3

birth - 3

commerce - 3

distribution - 3

degree - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

restriction - 3

insurance premiums - 3

insurer - 3

matched - 3

recession exposure - 3

regressing - 3

cohort - 3

productivity estimates - 3

productivity capital - 3

immigrated - 3

employment production - 3

earnings age - 3

retailer - 3

volatility - 3

importer - 3

custom - 3

industry employment - 3

increase employment - 3

impact employment - 3

wages employment - 3

earnings growth - 3

wage regressions - 3

assimilation - 3

fluctuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

exported - 3

exports firms - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

equity - 3

employment effects - 3

subsidized - 3

larger firms - 3

productivity shocks - 3

ethnically - 3

wage effects - 3

urban - 3

analyst - 3

growth firms - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

demography - 3

partnership - 3

coverage employer - 3

store - 3

development - 3

employment flows - 3

younger firms - 3

firm growth - 3

firms grow - 3

firms employment - 3

managerial - 3

buyer - 3

cost - 3

profitable - 3

plants industry - 3

compliance - 3

technical - 3

Viewing papers 51 through 60 of 334


  • Working Paper

    Nonresponse and Coverage Bias in the Household Pulse Survey: Evidence from Administrative Data

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-60

    The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau is a unique survey that provided timely data on the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American households and continues to provide data on other emergent social and economic issues. Because the survey has a response rate in the single digits and only has an online response mode, there are concerns about nonresponse and coverage bias. In this paper, we match administrative data from government agencies and third-party data to HPS respondents to examine how representative they are of the U.S. population. For comparison, we create a benchmark of American Community Survey (ACS) respondents and nonrespondents and include the ACS respondents as another point of reference. Overall, we find that the HPS is less representative of the U.S. population than the ACS. However, performance varies across administrative variables, and the existing weighting adjustments appear to greatly improve the representativeness of the HPS. Additionally, we look at household characteristics by their email domain to examine the effects on coverage from limiting email messages in 2023 to addresses from the contact frame with at least 90% deliverability rates, finding no clear change in the representativeness of the HPS afterwards.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the 2018-2022 Survey of Income and Program Participation

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-58

    Response rates to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in survey estimates. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we modify various parts of the SIPP weighting algorithm to incorporate such data. We create these new weights for the 2018 through 2022 SIPP panels and examine how the new weights affect survey estimates. Our results show that before weighting adjustments, SIPP respondents in these panels have higher socioeconomic status than the general population. Existing weighting procedures reduce many of these differences. Comparing SIPP estimates between the production weights and the administrative data-based weights yields changes that are not uniform across the joint income and program participation distribution. Unlike other Census Bureau household surveys, there is no large increase in nonresponse bias in SIPP due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In summary, the magnitude and sign of nonresponse bias in SIPP is complicated, and the existing weighting procedures may change the sign of nonresponse bias for households with certain incomes and program benefit statuses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Income, Wealth, and Environmental Inequality in the United States

    October 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-57

    This paper explores the relationships between air pollution, income, wealth, and race by combining administrative data from U.S. tax returns between 1979'2016, various measures of air pollution, and sociodemographic information from linked survey and administrative data. In the first year of our data, the relationship between income and ambient pollution levels nationally is approximately zero for both non-Hispanic White and Black individuals. However, at every single percentile of the national income distribution, Black individuals are exposed to, on average, higher levels of pollution than White individuals. By 2016, the relationship between income and air pollution had steepened, primarily for Black individuals, driven by changes in where rich and poor Black individuals live. We utilize quasi-random shocks to income to examine the causal effect of changes in income and wealth on pollution exposure over a five year horizon, finding that these income'pollution elasticities map closely to the values implied by our descriptive patterns. We calculate that Black-White differences in income can explain ~10 percent of the observed gap in air pollution levels in 2016.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Separate but Not Equal: The Uneven Cost of Residential Segregation for Network-Based Hiring

    October 2024

    Authors: Tam Mai

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-56

    This paper studies how residential segregation by race and by education affects job search via neighbor networks. Using confidential microdata from the US Census Bureau, I measure segregation for each characteristic at both the individual level and the neighborhood level. My findings are manifold. At the individual level, future coworkership with new neighbors on the same block is less likely among segregated individuals than among integrated workers, irrespective of races and levels of schooling. The impacts are most adverse for the most socioeconomically disadvantaged demographics: Blacks and those without a high school education. At the block level, however, higher segregation along either dimension raises the likelihood of any future coworkership on the block for all racial or educational groups. My identification strategy, capitalizing on data granularity, allows a causal interpretation of these results. Together, they point to the coexistence of homophily and in-group competition for job opportunities in linking residential segregation to neighbor-based informal hiring. My subtle findings have important implications for policy-making.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Comparison of Child Reporting in the American Community Survey and Federal Income Tax Returns Based on California Birth Records

    September 2024

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-55

    This paper takes advantage of administrative records from California, a state with a large child population and a significant historical undercount of children in Census Bureau data, dependent information in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1040 records, and the American Community Survey to characterize undercounted children and compare child reporting. While IRS Form 1040 records offer potential utility for adjusting child undercounting in Census Bureau surveys, this analysis finds overlapping reporting issues among various demographic and economic groups. Specifically, older children, those of Non-Hispanic Black mothers and Hispanic mothers, children or parents with lower English proficiency, children whose mothers did not complete high school, and families with lower income-to-poverty ratio were less frequently reported in IRS 1040 records than other groups. Therefore, using IRS 1040 dependent records may have limitations for accurately representing populations with characteristics associated with the undercount of children in surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Transitional Costs and the Decline of Coal: Worker-Level Evidence

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-53

    We examine the labor market impacts of the U.S. coal industry's decline using comprehensive administrative data on workers from 2005-2021. Coal workers most exposed to the industry's contraction experienced substantial earnings losses, equivalent to 1.6 years of predecline wages. These losses stem from both reduced employment duration (0.37 fewer years employed) and lower annual earnings (17 percent decline) between 2012-2019, relative to similar workers less exposed to coal's decline. Earnings reductions primarly occur when workers remain in local labor markets but are not employed in mining. While coal workers do not exhibit lower geographic mobility, relocation does not significantly mitigate their earnings losses.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Earnings Through the Stages: Using Tax Data to Test for Sources of Error in CPS ASEC Earnings and Inequality Measures

    September 2024

    Authors: Ethan Krohn

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-52

    In this paper, I explore the impact of generalized coverage error, item non-response bias, and measurement error on measures of earnings and earnings inequality in the CPS ASEC. I match addresses selected for the CPS ASEC to administrative data from 1040 tax returns. I then compare earnings statistics in the tax data for wage and salary earnings in samples corresponding to seven stages of the CPS ASEC survey production process. I also compare the statistics using the actual survey responses. The statistics I examine include mean earnings, the Gini coefficient, percentile earnings shares, and shares of the survey weight for a range of percentiles. I examine how the accuracy of the statistics calculated using the survey data is affected by including imputed responses for both those who did not respond to the full CPS ASEC and those who did not respond to the earnings question. I find that generalized coverage error and item nonresponse bias are dominated by measurement error, and that an important aspect of measurement error is households reporting no wage and salary earnings in the CPS ASEC when there are such earnings in the tax data. I find that the CPS ASEC sample misses earnings at the high end of the distribution from the initial selection stage and that the final survey weights exacerbate this.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Revisions to the LEHD Establishment Imputation Procedure and Applications to Administrative Job Frame

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-51

    The Census Bureau is developing a 'job frame' to provide detailed job-level employment data across the U.S. through linked administrative records such as unemployment insurance and IRS W-2 filings. This working paper summarizes the research conducted by the job frame development team on modifying and extending the LEHD Unit-to-Worker (U2W) imputation procedure for the job frame prototype. It provides a conceptual overview of the U2W imputation method, highlighting key challenges and tradeoffs in its current application. The paper then presents four imputation methodologies and evaluates their performance in areas such as establishment assignment accuracy, establishment size matching, and job separation rates. The results show that all methodologies perform similarly in assigning workers to the correct establishment. Non-spell-based methodologies excel in matching establishment sizes, while spell-based methodologies perform better in accurately tracking separation rates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Internal Migration in the U.S. During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    September 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-50

    Survey and administrative internal migration data disagree on whether the COVID-19 pandemic increased or decreased mobility in the U.S. Moreover, though scholars have theorized and documented migration in response to environmental hazards and economic shocks, the novel conditions posed by a global pandemic make it difficult to hypothesize whether and how American migration might change as a result. We link individual-level data from the United States Postal Service's National Change of Address (NCOA) registry to American Community Survey (ACS) and Current Population Survey (CPS-ASEC) responses and other administrative records to document changes in the level, geography, and composition of migrant flows between 2019 and 2021. We find a 2% increase in address changes between 2019 and 2020, representing an additional 603,000 moves, driven primarily by young adults, earners at the extremes of the income distribution, and individuals (as opposed to families) moving over longer distances. Though the number of address changes returned to pre-pandemic levels in 2021, the pandemic-era geographic and compositional shifts in favor of longer distance moves away from the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic regions toward the South and in favor of younger, individual movers persisted. We also show that at least part of the disconnect between survey, media, and administrative/third-party migration data sources stems from the apparent misreporting of address changes on Census Bureau surveys. Among ACS and CPS-ASEC householders linked to NCOA data and filing a permanent change of address in their 1-year survey response reference period, only around 68% of ACS and 49% of CPS-ASEC householders also reported living in a different residence one year ago in their survey response.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Driving the Gig Economy

    August 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-42

    Using rich administrative tax data, we explore the effects of the introduction of online ridesharing platforms on entry, employment and earnings in the Taxi and Limousine Services industry. Ridesharing dramatically increased the pace of entry of workers into the industry. New entrants were more likely to be young, female, White and U.S. born, and to combine earnings from ridesharing with wage and salary earnings. Displaced workers have found ridesharing to be a substantially more attractive fallback option than driving a taxi. Ridesharing also affected the incumbent taxi driver workforce. The exit rates of low-earning taxi drivers increased following the introduction of ridesharing in their city; exit rates of high-earning taxi drivers were little affected. In cities without regulations limiting the size of the taxi fleet, both groups of drivers experienced earnings losses following the introduction of ridesharing. These losses were ameliorated or absent in more heavily regulated markets.
    View Full Paper PDF