CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Service Annual Survey'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 37

Internal Revenue Service - 31

Longitudinal Business Database - 31

North American Industry Classification System - 30

Business Register - 30

Employer Identification Numbers - 27

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 27

American Community Survey - 25

Standard Industrial Classification - 24

National Science Foundation - 24

Social Security Administration - 23

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 23

Research Data Center - 23

Current Population Survey - 22

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 20

Economic Census - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 19

Protected Identification Key - 18

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Social Security Number - 16

Social Security - 15

Disclosure Review Board - 15

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 15

Cornell University - 15

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 13

County Business Patterns - 13

Longitudinal Research Database - 13

Decennial Census - 12

Master Address File - 12

Unemployment Insurance - 12

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 12

Census Bureau Business Register - 11

2010 Census - 11

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

Small Business Administration - 10

Person Validation System - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 9

Permanent Plant Number - 9

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 8

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 8

DOB - 8

Special Sworn Status - 8

Federal Reserve Bank - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

National Bureau of Economic Research - 8

Company Organization Survey - 7

National Center for Health Statistics - 7

Employment History File - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Census of Manufactures - 7

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 7

Office of Management and Budget - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 6

Individual Characteristics File - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 6

Patent and Trademark Office - 6

Business Employment Dynamics - 6

Retail Trade - 6

Person Identification Validation System - 6

American Economic Association - 6

Business Master File - 6

LEHD Program - 6

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 5

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Office of Personnel Management - 5

Census Numident - 5

Federal Tax Information - 5

Postal Service - 5

Department of Agriculture - 5

Public Administration - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

SSA Numident - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Federal Reserve System - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

1940 Census - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

MIT Press - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

University of Michigan - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

Administrative Records - 4

Ordinary Least Squares - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Federal Register - 3

W-2 - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Professional Services - 3

IBM - 3

COVID-19 - 3

Survey of Business Owners - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 3

Personally Identifiable Information - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

Department of Labor - 3

Wholesale Trade - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

International Trade Research Report - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Yale University - 3

PSID - 3

Survey of Consumer Finances - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

survey - 29

data - 29

respondent - 20

datasets - 19

enterprise - 18

census data - 18

record - 18

data census - 18

statistical - 17

payroll - 17

census bureau - 16

agency - 16

microdata - 16

employed - 16

employee - 15

database - 14

report - 13

analysis - 13

manufacturing - 13

workforce - 12

econometric - 12

company - 11

incorporated - 11

population - 11

sector - 11

establishment - 11

estimating - 11

sale - 11

matching - 10

industrial - 10

corporation - 9

identifier - 9

use census - 9

researcher - 9

quarterly - 9

expenditure - 9

census employment - 8

employee data - 8

inventory - 8

employment data - 8

economist - 8

statistician - 8

proprietorship - 8

research - 8

matched - 7

coverage - 7

employ - 7

census research - 7

innovation - 7

patent - 7

longitudinal - 7

gdp - 7

revenue - 7

production - 7

manufacturer - 7

residential - 7

department - 6

insurance - 6

information - 6

work census - 6

employment statistics - 6

employer household - 6

longitudinal employer - 6

organizational - 6

patenting - 6

business data - 6

censuses surveys - 6

census survey - 6

growth - 6

census file - 6

research census - 6

aggregate - 6

earnings - 6

labor - 6

information census - 5

disclosure - 5

ssa - 5

metropolitan - 5

geographic - 5

healthcare - 5

survey data - 5

acquisition - 5

economic census - 5

worker - 5

clerical - 5

study - 5

residence - 5

housing - 5

invention - 5

indian - 4

socioeconomic - 4

assessed - 4

rural - 4

market - 4

export - 4

corp - 4

associate - 4

firms patents - 4

recession - 4

warehousing - 4

businesses census - 4

census use - 4

technology - 4

technological - 4

venture - 4

entrepreneurship - 4

citizen - 4

records census - 4

linkage - 4

linked census - 4

irs - 4

job - 4

estimation - 4

estimates employment - 4

macroeconomic - 4

corporate - 3

subsidiary - 3

proprietor - 3

firm data - 3

ethnicity - 3

hispanic - 3

area - 3

region - 3

geography - 3

disparity - 3

sampling - 3

empirical - 3

environmental - 3

sample - 3

workforce indicators - 3

confidentiality - 3

prevalence - 3

investment - 3

import - 3

trademark - 3

patents firms - 3

reporting - 3

establishments data - 3

census years - 3

enrollment - 3

household surveys - 3

provided census - 3

competitiveness - 3

exporting - 3

exporter - 3

wholesale - 3

firms export - 3

importer - 3

tariff - 3

entrepreneurial - 3

hiring - 3

workplace - 3

employment dynamics - 3

privacy - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

housing survey - 3

aggregation - 3

commute - 3

imputation - 3

expense - 3

imputed - 3

firm patenting - 3

innovative - 3

ancestry - 3

census records - 3

labor statistics - 3

health insurance - 3

aging - 3

demand - 3

census business - 3

Viewing papers 51 through 60 of 81


  • Working Paper

    Evaluating the Impact of MEP Services on Establishment Performance: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-15

    This work examines the impact of manufacturing extension services on establishment productivity. It builds on an earlier study conducted by Jarmin in the 1990s, by matching the Census of Manufacturers (CMF) with the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) customer and activity datasets to generate treatment and comparison groups for analysis. The scope of the study is the period 1997 to 2002, which was a period of economic downturn in the manufacturing sector and budgetary challenges for the MEP. The paper presents some preliminary findings from this analysis. Both lagged dependent variable (LDV) and difference in difference (DiD) models are employed to estimate the relationship between manufacturing extension and labor productivity. The results presented are inconclusive and paint a mixed picture as they demonstrate the benefits and limitations of using Census microdata in program evaluation. They also point to the need to conduct analyses that could help to better understand the dynamic impact of MEP services.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Data Documentation LEHD-OVERVIEW-S2008-rev1

    December 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-43

    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Newly Recovered Microdata on U.S. Manufacturing Plants from the 1950s and 1960s: Some Early Glimpses

    September 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-29

    Longitudinally-linked microdata on U.S. manufacturing plants are currently available to researchers for 1963, 1967, and 1972-2009. In this paper, we provide a first look at recently recovered manufacturing microdata files from the 1950s and 1960s. We describe their origins and background, discuss their contents, and begin to explore their sample coverage. We also begin to examine whether the available establishment identifier(s) allow record linking. Our preliminary analyses suggest that longitudinally-linked Annual Survey of Manufactures microdata from the mid-1950s through the present ' containing 16 years of additional data ' appears possible though challenging. While a great deal of work remains, we see tremendous value in extending the manufacturing microdata series back into time. With these data, new lines of research become possible and many others can be revisited.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Guide to the MEPS-IC Government List Sample Microdata

    September 2011

    Authors: Alice Zawacki

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-27

    The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates on employer sponsored health insurance. MEPSIC data are collected from private sector employers, as well as state and local governments. While similar information is gathered from these two sectors, differences in the survey process exist. The goal of this paper is to provide details on the public sector including types of state and local government employers, sample design, general information on the data collected in the MEPS-IC, and additional sources of information.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure Files in the Census RDC: Overview of S2004 Snapshot

    April 2011

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-11-13

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2004 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's Research Data Center network.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    NBER Patent Data-BR Bridge: User Guide and Technical Documentation

    October 2010

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-10-36

    This note provides details about the construction of the NBER Patent Data-BR concordance, and is intended for researchers planning to use this concordance. In addition to describing the matching process used to construct the concordance, this note provides a discussion of the benefits and limitations of this concordance.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Concentration Levels in the U.S. Advertising and Marketing Services Industry: Myth vs. Reality

    August 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-16

    We analyze changes in concentration levels in the U.S. Advertising and Marketing Services industry using data from the U.S. Census Bureau's quinquennial Economic Census and the Service Annual Survey. Heretofore largely ignored, these data allow us to redress some of the measurement problems surrounding estimates found in the existing literature Firm level concentration as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index varies across the sectors comprising the industry, but all are within the range generally considered as indicative of a competitive industry. At the holding company level, the four largest organizations account for about a quarter of the industry's total revenue, a share lower by an order of magnitude than that frequently cited in the trade press.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Happens When Firms Patent? New Evidence from U.S. Economic Census Data

    January 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-03

    In this study, we present novel statistics on the patenting in US manufacturing and new evidence on the question of what happens when firms patent. We do so by creating a comprehensive firm-patent matched dataset that links the NBER patent data (covering the universe of patents) to firm data from the US Census Bureau (which covers the universe of all firms with paid employees). Our linked dataset covers more than 48,000 unique assignees (compared to about 4,100 assignees covered by the Compustat-NBER link), representing almost two-thirds of all non-individual, non-university, non-government assignees from 1975 to 1997. We use the data to present some basic but novel statistics on the role of patenting in US manufacturing, including strong evidence confirming the highly skewed nature of patenting activity. Next, we examine what happens when firms patent by looking at a large sample of first time patentees. We find that while there are significant cross-sectional differences in size and total factor productivity between patentee firms and non-patentee firms, changes in patentownership status within firms is associated with a contemporaneous and substantial increase in firm size, but little to no change in total factor productivity. This evidence suggests that patenting is associated with firm growth through new product innovations (firm scope) rather than through reduction in the cost of producing existing products (firm productivity). Consistent with this explanation, we find that when firms patent, there is a contemporaneous increase in the number of products that the firms produce. Estimates of (within-firm) elasticity of firm characteristics to patent stock confirm our results. Our findings are robust to alternative measures of size and productivity, and to various sample selection criteria.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Regional Industrial Dominance, Agglomeration Economies, and Manufacturing Plant Productivity

    December 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-31

    In a seminal article, Benjamin Chinitz (1961) focused attention on the effects that industry size, structure, and economic diversification have on firm performance and regional economies. He also raised a related but conceptually distinct question that has been overlooked since: how does the extent to which a regional industry is concentrated in a single or small number of firms impact the performance of other local firms within that industry? He suggested that such regional industrial dominance may impact input prices, limit capital accessibility, deter entrepreneurial activity, and reduce the regional availability of agglomeration economies such as specialized labor and supply pools In this paper, we use an establishment-level production function to quantify the links between industrial dominance, agglomeration economies, and firm performance. We consider two questions. First, do greater levels of regional industrial dominance lead to lower economic performance by small, dominated manufacturing plants? Second, are small plants in dominated regional industries more limited in capturing regional agglomeration benefits and therefore do they face rigidities in deploying production factors to maximum advantage? Our results suggest that regional industrial organization does influence productivity but that the effect tends to be a direct one, rather than an indirect effect via its influence on agglomeration economies.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Electricity Pricing to U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963-2000

    October 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-28

    We construct a large customer-level database and use it to study electricity pricing patterns from 1963 to 2000. The data show tremendous cross-sectional dispersion in the electricity prices paid by manufacturing plants, reflecting spatial price differences and quantity discounts. Price dispersion declined sharply between 1967 and 1977 because of erosion in quantity discounts. To estimate the role of cost factors and markups in quantity discounts, we exploit differences among utilities in the purchases distribution of their customers. The estimation results reveal that supply costs per watt-hour decline by more than half over the range of customer-level purchases in the data, regardless of time period. Prior to the mid 1970s, marginal price and marginal cost schedules with respect to annual purchase quantity are remarkably similar, in line with efficient pricing. In later years, marginal supply costs exceed marginal prices for smaller manufacturing customers by 10% or more. The evidence provides no support for a standard Ramsey-pricing interpretation of quantity discounts on the margin we study. Spatial dispersion in retail electricity prices among states, counties and utility service territories is large, rises over time for smaller purchasers, and does not diminish as wholesale power markets expand in the 1990s.
    View Full Paper PDF