CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'American Economic Review'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Journal of Political Economy - 26

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 25

North American Industry Classification System - 24

Center for Economic Studies - 23

University of Chicago - 22

National Science Foundation - 21

National Bureau of Economic Research - 20

Review of Economics and Statistics - 20

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 19

Ordinary Least Squares - 19

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Journal of Labor Economics - 15

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

Longitudinal Business Database - 14

MIT Press - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Review of Economic Studies - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 13

Census of Manufactures - 13

Journal of Econometrics - 11

Cambridge University Press - 11

Total Factor Productivity - 11

Journal of International Economics - 11

Princeton University Press - 10

Harvard University - 10

Employer Identification Numbers - 10

Current Population Survey - 10

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 9

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Internal Revenue Service - 8

World Bank - 8

Journal of Human Resources - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Social Security Administration - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Columbia University - 6

Decennial Census - 6

Special Sworn Status - 6

Cornell University - 6

Business Register - 6

Research Data Center - 6

Social Security Number - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 6

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

University of Maryland - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Service Annual Survey - 5

Social Security - 5

American Community Survey - 5

Protected Identification Key - 5

Business Employment Dynamics - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Office of Personnel Management - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 4

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Employment History File - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

LEHD Program - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Brookings Institution - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Technical Services - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Business Master File - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

American Housing Survey - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Master Address File - 3

Business Register Bridge - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

Economic Census - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Stanford University - 3

New York Times - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

2010 Census - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

econometric - 27

production - 16

workforce - 15

macroeconomic - 14

manufacturing - 14

economist - 14

labor - 13

employ - 12

employee - 11

employed - 9

export - 8

industrial - 8

hiring - 7

payroll - 7

worker - 7

market - 7

demand - 7

growth - 7

earnings - 6

innovation - 6

sale - 6

workplace - 6

salary - 6

revenue - 6

expenditure - 6

factory - 6

organizational - 5

discrimination - 5

recession - 5

occupation - 5

census employment - 5

manufacturer - 5

profit - 5

tariff - 5

entrepreneurship - 4

competitor - 4

survey - 4

agency - 4

employment data - 4

employment dynamics - 4

employment statistics - 4

employer household - 4

profitability - 4

enterprise - 4

spillover - 4

import - 4

exporter - 4

company - 4

establishment - 4

externality - 4

efficiency - 4

diversification - 4

textile - 4

patent - 4

entrepreneurial - 3

venture - 3

entrepreneur - 3

startup firms - 3

startups employees - 3

managerial - 3

management - 3

hire - 3

clerical - 3

census bureau - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

employee data - 3

corporate - 3

specialization - 3

competitiveness - 3

regulation - 3

estimation - 3

quarterly - 3

enrollment - 3

schooling - 3

gdp - 3

firms export - 3

importer - 3

exporting firms - 3

report - 3

exporting - 3

subsidy - 3

insurance - 3

wages productivity - 3

product - 3

sector - 3

midwest - 3

regional - 3

sectoral - 3

regional economic - 3

region - 3

industrialized - 3

regional industry - 3

regional industries - 3

estimating - 3

employment growth - 3

labor statistics - 3

monopolistic - 3

quantity - 3

produce - 3

plants industries - 3

econometrician - 3

plant productivity - 3

Viewing papers 41 through 49 of 49


  • Working Paper

    The Diffusion of Modern Manufacturing Practices: Evidence from Retail-Apparel Sectors

    February 1997

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-11

    As in many industries, firms in the apparel industry exhibit substantial heterogeneity in the adoption of "modern manufacturing" practices. Based on detailed business-unit level data, we show that this heterogeneity can be explained firm inputs. We show that the interaction between these explanatory factors means that complementarities between inputs may emerge over time rather than all at once as is often assumed in other studies of complementarities.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Interfirm Segregation and the Black/White Wage Gap

    August 1996

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-96-06

    This paper studies interfirm racial segregation in two newly developed firm-level databases. Within the representative MSA, we find that the interfirm distribution of black and white workers is close to what would be implied by the random assignment of workers to firms. However, we also find that black workers are systematically clustered in "black" employers where managers, owners, and customers are also black. These facts may be reconciled by the facts that a) there are not enough black employers to generate much segregation and that b) perhaps other difficult-to-identify forces serve to systematically integrate black and white workers. Finally, we find that the black/white wage gap is entirely a within-firm phenomenon, as blacks do not work in firms that pay low wages on average.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    ARE FIXED EFFECTS FIXED? Persistence in Plant Level Productivity

    May 1996

    Authors: Douglas W Dwyer

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-96-03

    Estimates of production functions suffer from an omitted variable problem; plant quality is an omitted variable that is likely to be correlated with variable inputs. One approach is to capture differences in plant qualities through plant specific intercepts, i.e., to estimate a fixed effects model. For this technique to work, it is necessary that differences in plant quality are more or less fixed; if the "fixed effects" erode over time, such a procedure becomes problematic, especially when working with long panels. In this paper, a standard fixed effects model, extended to allow for serial correlation in the error term, is applied to a 16-year panel of textile plants. This parametric approach strongly accepts the hypothesis of fixed effects. They account for about one-third of the variation in productivity. A simple non-parametric approach, however, concludes that differences in plant qualities erode over time, that is plant qualities f-mix. Monte Carlo results demonstrate that this discrepancy comes from the parametric approach imposing an overly restrictive functional form on the data; if there were fixed effects of the magnitude measured, one would reject the hypothesis of f-mixing. For textiles, at least, the functional form of a fixed effects model appears to generate misleading conclusions. A more flexible functional form is estimated. The "fixed" effects actually have a half life of approximately 10 to 20 years, and they account for about one-half the variation in productivity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Innovation and Regulation in the Pesticide Industry

    December 1995

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-95-14

    This paper examines the hypothesis that regulation negatively affects pesticide innovation, causes pesticide companies to introduce more harmful pesticides, and discourages firms from developing pesticides for minor crop markets. The results confirm that pesticide regulation adversely affects innovation and discourages firms from developing pesticides for minor crop markets. Contrary to the hypothesis, however, regulation encourages firms to develop less toxic pesticides. Estimates suggest that it requires about $29 million in industry expenditures on health and environmental testing to affect the toxicity of one new pesticide.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Span of the Effect of R&D in the Firm and Industry

    May 1994

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-94-07

    Previous studies have found that the firm's own research and spillovers of research by related firms increase firm productivity. In contrast, in this paper we explore the impact of firm R&D on the productivity of its individual plants. We carry out this investigation of within firm R&D effects using a unique set of Census data. The data, which are from the chemicals industry, are a match of plant level productivity and other characteristics with firm level data on R&D of the parent company, cross-classified by location and applied product field. We explore three aspects of the span of effect of the firm's R&D: (i), the degree to which its R&D is "public" across plants; (ii), the extent of its localization in geographic space, and (iii), the breadth of its relevance outside the applied product area in which it is classified. We find that (i), firm R&D acts more like a private input which is strongly amortized by the number of plants in the firm; (ii), firm R&D is geographically localized, and exerts greater influence on productivity when it is conducted nearer to the plant; and (iii), firm R&D in a given applied product area is of limited relevance to plants producing outside that product area. Moreover, we find that while geographic localization remains significant, it diminishes over time. This trend is consistent with the effect of improved telecommunications on increased information flows within organizations. Finally, we consider spillovers of R&D from the rest of industry, finding that the marginal product of industry R&D on plant productivity, though positive and significant, is far smaller than the marginal product of parent firm's R&D.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Structure Of Technology, Substitution, And Productivity In The Interstate Natural Gas Transmission Industry Under The NGPA Of 1978

    August 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-09

    The structure of production in the natural gas transmission industry is estimated using the dual restricted cost function based on panel data for twenty four firms. A standard translog variable cost function with firm fixed effects is augmented with controls for capacity utilization, technical change, and shifting regulatory regimes. During the implementation of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA), 1978-1985, the industry exhibited no significant increase in productivity, largely attributable to the decline in output for the industry. Regulatory efforts to promote voluntary non-contract transmission appear to have enabled some firms to mitigate the overall industry productivity stagnation. The NGPA instituted a complex schedule of partial and gradual decontrol of natural gas prices at the well head. This form of deregulation costs natural gas producers over $100 billion in lost revenues, relative to immediate and full price deregulation. However, the transmission firms benefited by paying $1.5 billion less for natural gas than they would have under total deregulation. The benefits to consumers, totaling $98.7 billion, were unevenly distributed. On average, for the 1978-1985 period, utilities, commercial, and industrial users paid less for their gas than they would have under total decontrol and residential users paid $8.6 billion more. The NGPA and Federal Regulatory Commission oversight practices allow the transmission industry to price discriminate among customers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Price Dispersion In U.S. Manufacturing: Implications For The Aggregation Of Products And Firms

    March 1992

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-92-03

    This paper addresses the question of whether products in the U.S. Manufacturing sector sell at a single (common) price, or whether prices vary across producers. Price dispersion is interesting for at least two reasons. First, if output prices vary across producers, standard methods of using industry price deflators lead to errors in measuring real output at the industry, firm, and establishment level which may bias estimates of the production function and productivity growth. Second, price dispersion suggests product heterogeneity which, if consumers do not have identical preferences, could lead to market segmentation and price in excess of marginal cost, thus making the current (competitive) characterization of the Manufacturing sector inappropriate and invalidating many empirical studies. In the course of examining these issues, the paper develops a robust measure of price dispersion as well as new quantitative methods for testing whether observed price differences are the result of differences in product quality. Our results indicate that price dispersion is widespread throughout manufacturing and that for at least one industry, Hydraulic Cement, it is not the result of differences in product quality.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technology Usage in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: New Evidence from the Survey of Manufacturing Technology

    October 1991

    Authors: Timothy Dunne

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-91-07

    Using a new dataset on technology usage in U.S. manufacturing plants, this paper describes how technology usage varies by plant and firm characteristics. The paper extends the previous literature in three important ways. First, it examines a wide range of relatively new technologies. Second, the paper uses a much larger and more representative set of firms and establishments than previous studies. Finally, the paper explores the role of firm R&D expenditures in the process of technology adoption. The main findings indicate that larger plants more readily use new technologies, plants owned by firms with high R&D-to-sales ratios adopt technologies more rapidly, and the relationship between plant age and technology usage is relatively weak.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Structure Of Production Technology Productivity And Aggregation Effects

    August 1991

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-91-05

    This is a sequel to an earlier paper by the author, Dhrymes (1990). Using the LRD sample, that paper examined the adequacy of the functional form specifications commonly employed in the literature of US Manufacturing production relations. The "universe" of the investigation was the three digit product group; the basic unit of observation was the plant; the sample consisted of all "large" plants, defined by the criterion that they employ 250 or more workers. The study encompassed three digit product groups in industries 35, 36 and 38, over the period 1972-1986, and reached one major conclusion: if one were to judge the adequacy of a given specification by the parametric compatibility of the estimates of the same parameters, as derived from the various implications of each specification, then the three most popular (production function) specifications, Cobb-Douglas, CES and Translog all fell very wide of the mark. The current paper focuses the investigation on two digit industries (but retains the plant as the basic unit of observation), i.e., our sample consists of all "large" manufacturing plants, in each of Industry 35, 36 and 38, over the period 1972-1986. It first replicates the approach of the earlier paper; the results are basically of the same genre, and for that reason are not reported herein. Second, it examines the extent to which increasing returns to scale characterize production at the two digit level; it is established that returns to scale at the mean, in the case of the translog production function are almost identical to those obtained with the Cobb-Douglas function.1 Finally, it examines the robustness and characteristics of measures of productivity, obtained in the context of an econometric formulation and those obtained by the method of what may be thought of as the "Solow Residual" and generally designated as Total Factor Productivity (TFP). The major finding here is that while there are some differences in productivity behavior as established by these two procedures, by far more important is the aggregation sensitivity of productivity measures. Thus, in the context of a pooled sample, introduction of time effects (generally thought to refer to productivity shifts) are of very marginal consequence. On the other hand, the introduction of four digit industry effects is of appreciable consequence, and this phenomenon is universal, i.e., it is present in industry 35, 36 as well as 38. The suggestion that aggregate productivity behavior may be largely, or partly, an aggregation phenomenon is certainly not a part of the established literature. Another persistent phenomenon uncovered is the extent to which productivity measures for individual plants are volatile, while two digit aggregate measures appear to be stable. These findings clearly calls for further investigation.
    View Full Paper PDF