CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Business Register'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 87

North American Industry Classification System - 87

Internal Revenue Service - 68

Employer Identification Numbers - 68

Center for Economic Studies - 60

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 52

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 47

Census Bureau Business Register - 46

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 45

Economic Census - 41

National Science Foundation - 40

National Bureau of Economic Research - 35

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 35

Disclosure Review Board - 34

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 34

Current Population Survey - 34

Social Security Administration - 31

Standard Industrial Classification - 31

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 30

Service Annual Survey - 30

Protected Identification Key - 28

Business Dynamics Statistics - 27

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 26

American Community Survey - 26

Ordinary Least Squares - 24

County Business Patterns - 23

Research Data Center - 22

Decennial Census - 22

Social Security Number - 21

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 19

Census of Manufactures - 19

Social Security - 19

Company Organization Survey - 17

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 16

Federal Reserve Bank - 16

Patent and Trademark Office - 16

University of Chicago - 16

Cornell University - 16

Total Factor Productivity - 15

Postal Service - 15

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 14

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 14

W-2 - 13

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 13

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 12

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Office of Management and Budget - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

Local Employment Dynamics - 11

Survey of Business Owners - 11

Department of Labor - 11

Longitudinal Research Database - 11

Unemployment Insurance - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

Small Business Administration - 10

University of Maryland - 10

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 10

University of Michigan - 9

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 9

Person Validation System - 9

Technical Services - 9

Sloan Foundation - 9

Business Master File - 9

Office of Personnel Management - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Federal Reserve System - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Employment History File - 8

Master Address File - 8

2010 Census - 8

Harmonized System - 8

Retail Trade - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 8

Business Employment Dynamics - 8

Kauffman Foundation - 8

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 8

New York University - 7

World Bank - 7

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 7

Agriculture, Forestry - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

Initial Public Offering - 7

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 7

Wholesale Trade - 7

Public Administration - 7

Census Numident - 7

National Center for Health Statistics - 7

Foreign Direct Investment - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

North American Industry Classi - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Establishment Micro Properties - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Legal Form of Organization - 6

LEHD Program - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Customs and Border Protection - 6

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 6

Educational Services - 6

Accommodation and Food Services - 6

American Housing Survey - 6

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 6

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

American Economic Review - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Probability Density Function - 6

Federal Tax Information - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

United Nations - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Nonemployer Statistics - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

European Union - 5

COVID-19 - 5

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 5

Health Care and Social Assistance - 5

Limited Liability Company - 5

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 5

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 5

SSA Numident - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

IBM - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

PSID - 5

University of Toronto - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Sample Edited Detail File - 5

Permanent Plant Number - 5

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 4

Environmental Protection Agency - 4

World Trade Organization - 4

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

Research and Development - 4

Fabricated Metal Products - 4

Paycheck Protection Program - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Oil and Gas Extraction - 4

Administrative Records - 4

George Mason University - 4

IZA - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

AKM - 4

University of California Los Angeles - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

New York Times - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

COMPUSTAT - 4

2SLS - 3

General Accounting Office - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

Business Services - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

Federal Register - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Professional Services - 3

Kauffman Firm Survey - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Business Formation Statistics - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Data Management System - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

HHS - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Guzman and Stern - 3

MIT Press - 3

DOB - 3

Person Identification Validation System - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Census of Retail Trade - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

National Research Council - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

WECD - 3

employed - 35

survey - 35

employ - 33

workforce - 31

enterprise - 29

employee - 27

company - 26

agency - 26

payroll - 24

manufacturing - 21

entrepreneur - 20

respondent - 20

recession - 20

labor - 20

sector - 20

sale - 18

gdp - 18

census bureau - 18

entrepreneurship - 18

innovation - 17

earnings - 17

economic census - 17

market - 16

macroeconomic - 16

data - 16

data census - 16

census data - 15

report - 15

patent - 15

organizational - 15

revenue - 15

expenditure - 15

econometric - 15

incorporated - 14

economist - 14

growth - 14

establishment - 14

industrial - 14

export - 13

multinational - 13

proprietorship - 13

venture - 13

patenting - 13

worker - 13

estimating - 13

statistical - 13

manufacturer - 13

corporation - 12

census employment - 12

inventory - 12

population - 12

acquisition - 11

longitudinal - 11

quarterly - 11

occupation - 11

microdata - 11

proprietor - 10

entrepreneurial - 10

employment data - 10

irs - 10

investment - 10

researcher - 10

invention - 10

workplace - 10

aggregate - 10

import - 9

exporter - 9

record - 9

earner - 9

research census - 9

coverage - 9

business data - 9

corporate - 8

finance - 8

economically - 8

corp - 8

database - 8

work census - 8

employment statistics - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employee data - 8

investor - 8

innovative - 8

ethnicity - 8

datasets - 8

insurance - 8

production - 8

wholesale - 8

subsidiary - 7

information census - 7

funding - 7

innovator - 7

trend - 7

employment dynamics - 7

estimation - 7

census survey - 7

salary - 7

econometrician - 7

statistician - 7

financial - 6

shipment - 6

exported - 6

department - 6

identifier - 6

assessed - 6

founder - 6

technological - 6

hiring - 6

longitudinal employer - 6

minority - 6

earn - 6

innovate - 6

technology - 6

endogeneity - 6

incentive - 6

use census - 6

job - 6

census business - 6

lender - 5

filing - 5

leverage - 5

loan - 5

exporting - 5

foreign - 5

disclosure - 5

merger - 5

nonemployer businesses - 5

spillover - 5

trading - 5

firms patents - 5

patenting firms - 5

employment trends - 5

hispanic - 5

medicaid - 5

ethnic - 5

immigrant - 5

study - 5

employment growth - 5

management - 5

matching - 5

associate - 5

warehousing - 5

businesses census - 5

tariff - 5

imputation - 5

healthcare - 5

health insurance - 5

clerical - 5

employer household - 5

aging - 5

discrimination - 5

debt - 4

borrower - 4

commerce - 4

exporters multinationals - 4

trader - 4

2010 census - 4

employed census - 4

importing - 4

firms export - 4

imported - 4

importer - 4

financing - 4

stock - 4

innovating - 4

patented - 4

patents firms - 4

firm patenting - 4

employment estimates - 4

worker demographics - 4

citizen - 4

shock - 4

research - 4

manager - 4

accounting - 4

pension - 4

classified - 4

classification - 4

trademark - 4

tax - 4

demand - 4

monopolistic - 4

metropolitan - 4

impact - 4

white - 4

census years - 4

census use - 4

custom - 4

customer - 4

retailer - 4

heterogeneity - 4

employment earnings - 4

tenure - 4

census research - 4

linked census - 4

enrollment - 4

insured - 4

surveys censuses - 4

factory - 4

estimates employment - 4

labor statistics - 4

volatility - 4

segregation - 4

federal - 4

bankruptcy - 3

creditor - 3

lending - 3

merchandise - 3

provided census - 3

international trade - 3

commodity - 3

sourcing - 3

equity - 3

fund - 3

invest - 3

developed - 3

bank - 3

migrant - 3

household surveys - 3

pandemic - 3

survey income - 3

income data - 3

unemployed - 3

disaster - 3

prospect - 3

managerial - 3

efficiency - 3

classifying - 3

employment measures - 3

average - 3

monopolistically - 3

technology adoption - 3

welfare - 3

compensation - 3

rural - 3

rurality - 3

retail - 3

black - 3

wealth - 3

yearly - 3

establishments data - 3

warehouse - 3

takeover - 3

acquirer - 3

reporting - 3

supplier - 3

industry employment - 3

employment wages - 3

state - 3

ownership - 3

startup - 3

growth firms - 3

enrollee - 3

insurance coverage - 3

firms census - 3

outsourcing - 3

outsourced - 3

census file - 3

measures employment - 3

employing - 3

productivity growth - 3

industry productivity - 3

productivity measures - 3

restructuring - 3

development - 3

innovation productivity - 3

residential - 3

workforce indicators - 3

racial - 3

race - 3

Viewing papers 41 through 50 of 138


  • Working Paper

    Recall and Response: Relationship Adjustments to Adverse Information Shocks

    March 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-13R

    How resilient are U.S. buyer-foreign supplier relationships to new information about product defects? We construct a novel dataset of U.S. consumer-product recalls sourced from foreign suppliers between 1995 and 2013. Using an event-study approach, we find that compared to control relationships, buyers that experience recalls temporarily reduce their probability of trading with the suppliers of the recalled products by 17%. The reduction is much larger for new than established buyer'supplier relationships. Buyers that experience a recall are more likely to add other suppliers to their portfolios, diversifying supplier-specific risk in the aftermath of a recall; this effect, too, is larger for buyers impacted by recalls in new relationships. There is a long lag ' up to two years ' before diversification, consistent with a high cost of establishing new relationships.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Customs Records Consistent Across Countries? Evidence from the U.S. and Colombia

    March 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-11

    In many countries, official customs records include identifying information on the exporting and importing firms involved in each shipment. This information allows researchers to study international business networks, offshoring patterns, and the micro-foundations of aggregate trade flows. It also provides the government with a basis for tariff assessments at the border. However, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure that the shipment-level information recorded by the exporting country is consistent with the shipment-level information recorded by the importing country. And to the extent that there are discrepancies, it is not clear how prevalent they are or what form they take. In this paper we explore these issues, both to enhance our understanding of the limitations of customs records, and to inform future discussions of possible revisions in the way they are collected. Specifically, we match U.S.-bound export shipments that appear in Colombian Customs records (DIAN) with their counterparts in the US Customs records (LFTTD): U.S. import shipments from Colombia. Several patterns emerge. First, differences in the coverage of the two countries customs records lead to significant discrepancies in the official bilateral trade flow statistics of these two countries: the DIAN database records 8 percent fewer transactions than the LFTTD database over the sample period, and the average export shipment size in the DIAN is roughly 4 percent smaller than the corresponding import shipment size in the LFTTD. These discrepancies are not due to difference in minimum shipment sizes and they are not particular to a few sectors, though they are more common among small shipments and they evolve over time. Second, if we rely exclusively on firms' names and addresses, ignoring other shipment characteristics (value, product code, etc.), we are able to match 85 percent of the value of U.S. imports from Colombia in our LFTTD sample with particular Colombian suppliers in the DIAN. Further, fully 97 percent of the value of Colombian exports to the U.S. can be mapped onto particular importers in the U.S. LFTTD. Third, however, match rates at the shipment level within buyer-seller pairs are low. That is, while buyers and sellers can be paired up fairly accurately, only 25-30 percent of the individual transactions in the customs records of the two countries can be matched using fuzzy algorithms at reasonable tolerance levels. Fourth, the manufacturer ID (MANUF_ID) that appears in the LFTTD implies there are roughly twice as many Colombian exporters as actually appear in the DIAN. And similar comments apply to an analogous MANUF_ID variable constructed from importer name and address information in the DIAN. Hence studies that treat each MANUF_ID value as a distinct firm are almost surely overstating the number of foreign firms that engage in trade with the U.S. by a substantial amount. Finally, we conclude that if countries were to require that exporters report standardized shipment identifiers'either invoice numbers or bill of lading/air waybill numbers'it would be far easier to track individual transactions and to identify international discrepancies in reporting.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Between Firm Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Dominant Role of Industry Effects

    February 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-08

    We find that most of the rising between firm earnings inequality that dominates the overall increase in inequality in the U.S. is accounted for by industry effects. These industry effects stem from rising inter-industry earnings differentials and not from changing distribution of employment across industries. We also find the rising inter-industry earnings differentials are almost completely accounted for by occupation effects. These results link together the key findings from separate components of the recent literature: one focuses on firm effects and the other on occupation effects. The link via industry effects challenges conventional wisdom.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Do Cash Windfalls Affect Wages? Evidence from R&D Grants to Small Firms

    February 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-06

    This paper examines how employee earnings at small firms respond to a cash flow shock in the form of a government R&D grant. We use ranking data on applicant firms, which we link to IRS W2 earnings and other U.S. Census Bureau datasets. In a regression discontinuity design, we find that the grant increases average earnings with a rent-sharing elasticity of 0.07 (0.21) at the employee (firm) level. The beneficiaries are incumbent employees who were present at the firm before the award. Among incumbent employees, the effect increases with worker tenure. The grant also leads to higher employment and revenue, but productivity growth cannot fully explain the immediate effect on earnings. Instead, the data and a grantee survey are consistent with a backloaded wage contract channel, in which employees of financially constrained firms initially accept relatively low wages and are paid more when cash is available.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Matching State Business Registration Records to Census Business Data

    January 2020

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-20-03

    We describe our methodology and results from matching state Business Registration Records (BRR) to Census business data. We use data from Massachusetts and California to develop methods and preliminary results that could be used to guide matching data for additional states. We obtain matches to Census business records for 45% of the Massachusetts BRR records and 40% of the California BRR records. We find higher match rates for incorporated businesses and businesses with higher startup-quality scores as assigned in Guzman and Stern (2018). Clerical reviews show that using relatively strict matching on address is important for match accuracy, while results are less sensitive to name matching strictness. Among matched BRR records, the modal timing of the first match to the BR is in the year in which the BRR record was filed. We use two sets of software to identify matches: SAS DQ Match and a machine-learning algorithm described in Cuffe and Goldschlag (2018). We find preliminary evidence that while the ML-based method yields more match results, SAS DQ tends to result in higher accuracy rates. To conclude, we provide suggestions on how to proceed with matching other states' data in light of our findings using these two states.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics (NES-D): Exploring Longitudinal Consistency and Sub-national Estimates

    December 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-34

    Until recently, the quinquennial Survey of Business Owners (SBO) was the only source of information for U.S. employer and nonemployer businesses by owner demographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity, sex and veteran status. Now, however, the Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics series (NES-D) will replace the SBO's nonemployer component with reliable, and more frequent (annual) business demographic estimates with no additional respondent burden, and at lower imputation rates and costs. NES-D is not a survey; rather, it exploits existing administrative and census records to assign demographic characteristics to the universe of approximately 25 million (as of 2016) nonemployer businesses. Although only in the second year of its research phase, NES-D is rapidly moving towards production, with a planned prototype or experimental version release of 2017 nonemployer data in 2020, followed by annual releases of the series. After the first year of research, we released a working paper (Luque et al., 2019) that assessed the viability of estimating nonemployer demographics exclusively with administrative records (AR) and census data. That paper used one year of data (2015) to produce preliminary tabulations of business counts at the national level. This year we expand that research in multiple ways by: i) examining the longitudinal consistency of administrative and census records coverage, and of our AR-based demographics estimates, ii) evaluating further coverage from additional data sources, iii) exploring estimates at the sub-national level, iv) exploring estimates by industrial sector, v) examining demographics estimates of business receipts as well as of counts, and vi) implementing imputation of missing demographic values. Our current results are consistent with the main findings in Luque et al. (2019), and show that high coverage and demographic assignment rates are not the exception, but the norm. Specifically, we find that AR coverage rates are high and stable over time for each of the three years we examine, 2014-2016. We are able to identify owners for approximately 99 percent of nonemployer businesses (excluding C-corporations), 92 to 93 percent of identified nonemployer owners have no missing demographics, and only about 1 percent are missing three or more demographic characteristics in each of the three years. We also find that our demographics estimates are stable over time, with expected small annual changes that are consistent with underlying population trends in the U.S.. Due to data limitations, these results do not include C-corporations, which represent only 2 percent of nonemployer businesses and 4 percent of receipts. Without added respondent burden and at lower imputation rates and costs, NES-D will provide high-quality business demographics estimates at a higher frequency (annual vs. every 5 years) than the SBO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Founding Teams and Startup Performance

    November 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-32

    We explore the role of founding teams in accounting for the post-entry dynamics of startups. While the entrepreneurship literature has largely focused on business founders, we broaden this view by considering founding teams, which include both the founders and the initial employees in the first year of operations. We investigate the idea that the success of a startup may derive from the organizational capital that is created at firm formation and is inalienable from the founding team itself. To test this hypothesis, we exploit premature deaths to identify the causal impact of losing a founding team member on startup performance. We find that the exogenous separation of a founding team member due to premature death has a persistently large, negative, and statistically significant impact on post-entry size, survival, and productivity of startups. While we find that the loss of a key founding team member (e.g. founders) has an especially large adverse effect, the loss of a non-key founding team member still has a significant adverse effect, lending support to our inclusive definition of founding teams. Furthermore, we find that the effects are particularly strong for small founding teams but are not driven by activity in small business-intensive or High Tech industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Automating Response Evaluation For Franchising Questions On The 2017 Economic Census

    July 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-20

    Between the 2007 and 2012 Economic Censuses (EC), the count of franchise-affiliated establishments declined by 9.8%. One reason for this decline was a reduction in resources that the Census Bureau was able to dedicate to the manual evaluation of survey responses in the franchise section of the EC. Extensive manual evaluation in 2007 resulted in many establishments, whose survey forms indicated they were not franchise-affiliated, being recoded as franchise-affiliated. No such evaluation could be undertaken in 2012. In this paper, we examine the potential of using external data harvested from the web in combination with machine learning methods to automate the process of evaluating responses to the franchise section of the 2017 EC. Our method allows us to quickly and accurately identify and recode establishments have been mistakenly classified as not being franchise-affiliated, increasing the unweighted number of franchise-affiliated establishments in the 2017 EC by 22%-42%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Statistics on the Small Business Administration's Scale-Up America Program

    April 2019

    Authors: C.J. Krizan

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-11

    This paper attempts to quantify the difference in performance, of 'treated' (program participant) and 'non-treated' (non-participant) firms in SBA's Scale-Up initiative. I combine data from the SBA with administrative data housed at Census using a combination of numeric and name and address matching techniques. My results show that after controlling for available observable characteristics, a positive correlation exists between participation in the Scale-Up initiative and firm growth. However, publicly available survey results have shown that entrepreneurs have a variety of goals in-mind when they start their businesses. Two prominent, and potentially contradictory ones are work-life balance and greater income. That means that not all firms may want to grow and I am unable to completely control for owner motivations. Finally, I do not find a statistically significant relationship between participation in Scale-Up and firm survival once other business characteristics are accounted for.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Optimal Probabilistic Record Linkage: Best Practice for Linking Employers in Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-08

    This paper illustrates an application of record linkage between a household-level survey and an establishment-level frame in the absence of unique identifiers. Linkage between frames in this setting is challenging because the distribution of employment across firms is highly asymmetric. To address these difficulties, this paper uses a supervised machine learning model to probabilistically link survey respondents in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with employers and establishments in the Census Business Register (BR) to create a new data source which we call the CenHRS. Multiple imputation is used to propagate uncertainty from the linkage step into subsequent analyses of the linked data. The linked data reveal new evidence that survey respondents' misreporting and selective nonresponse about employer characteristics are systematically correlated with wages.
    View Full Paper PDF