CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Department of Commerce'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Center for Economic Studies - 26

Standard Industrial Classification - 18

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 17

Internal Revenue Service - 15

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 15

Longitudinal Research Database - 15

North American Industry Classification System - 14

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

National Science Foundation - 13

National Bureau of Economic Research - 10

Ordinary Least Squares - 9

Longitudinal Business Database - 9

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 7

Social Security Number - 6

Protected Identification Key - 6

Business Register - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Census of Manufactures - 6

Total Factor Productivity - 6

Social Security Administration - 5

American Community Survey - 5

Economic Census - 5

Decennial Census - 5

Service Annual Survey - 5

Harvard University - 5

Employer Identification Numbers - 5

Small Business Administration - 5

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 5

MIT Press - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Cobb-Douglas - 5

Current Population Survey - 4

Social Security - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Disclosure Review Board - 4

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 4

American Economic Review - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 4

Electronic Data Interchange - 4

New York Times - 4

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 3

2010 Census - 3

Census of Retail Trade - 3

Federal Register - 3

Person Validation System - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

County Business Patterns - 3

Department of Labor - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

University of Chicago - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Census Bureau Business Register - 3

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 3

National Research Council - 3

Harmonized System - 3

Special Sworn Status - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

North American Free Trade Agreement - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Viewing papers 41 through 47 of 47


  • Working Paper

    Testing the Advantages of Using Product Level Data to Create Linkages Across Industrial Coding Systems

    October 1993

    Authors: Suzanne Peck

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-14

    After the major revision of the U.S. Standard Industrial Classification system (SIC) in the 1987, the problem arose of how to evaluate industrial performance over time. The revision resulted in the creation of new industries, the combination of old industries, and the remixing of other industries to better reflect the present U.S. economy. A method had to be developed to make the old and new sets of industries comparable over time. Ryten (1991) argues for performing the conversion at the "most micro level," the product level. Linking industries should be accomplished by reclassifying product data of each establishment to a standard system, reassigning the primary activity of the establishment, reaggregating the data to the industry level, and then making the desired statistical comparison (Ryten, 1991). This paper discusses linking the data at the very micro, product level, and at the more macro, industry level. The results suggest that with complete product information the product level conversion is preferable for most industries in manufacturing because it recognizes that establishments may switch their primary industry because of the conversion. For some industries, especially those having no substantial changes in SIC codes over time, the conversion at the industry level is fairly accurate. A small group of industries lacks complete product information in 1982 to link the 1982 product codes to the 1987 codes. This results in having to rely on the industry concordance to create a time series of statistics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Energy Intensity, Electricity Consumption, and Advanced Manufacturing Technology Usage

    July 1993

    Authors: Mark E Doms

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-93-09

    This paper reports on the relationship between the usage of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and energy consumption patterns in manufacturing plants. Using data from the Survey of Manufacturing Technology and the 1987 Census of Manufactures, we model the energy intensity and the electricity intensity of plants as functions of AMT usage and plant age. The main findings are that plants which utilize AMTs are less energy intensive than plants not using AMTs but consume proportionately more electricity as a fuel source. Additionally, older plants are generally more energy intensive and rely on fossil fuels to a greater extent than younger plants.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Decomposing Technical Change

    May 1991

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-91-04

    A production function is specified with human capital as a separate argument and with embodied technical change proxied by a variable that measures the average vintage of the stock of capital. The coefficients of this production function are estimated with cross section data for roughly 2,150 new manufacturing plants in 41 industries, and for subsets of this sample. The question of interactions between new investment and initial endowments of capital is then examined with data for roughly 1,400 old plants in 15 industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Export Performance and State Industrial Growth

    January 1990

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-90-03

    This research examines whether state industrial growth over the past decade has occurred independently of changes in manufacturing exports and whether export employment growth responds to the same economic and locational forces as employment growth in domestic production. The empirical results indicate that employment and value added growth are not independent of export sales growth; however, a shift toward export markets is not strongly associated with higher manufacturing growth rates. Traditional factors account for a far greater proportion of the variation in domestic than export employment growth. The results suggest the need for additional research on the sources of state comparative advantage in export markets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Longitudinal Economic Data At The Census Bureau: A New Database Yields Fresh Insight On Some Old Issues

    January 1990

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-90-01

    This paper has two goals. First, it illustrates the importance of panel data with examples taken from research in progress using the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Research Database ( LRD ). Although the LRD is not the result of a "true" longitudinal survey, it provides both balanced and unbalanced panel data sets for establishments, firms, and lines of business. The second goal is to integrate the results of recent research with the LRD and to draw conclusions about the importance of longitudinal microdata for econometric research and time series analysis. The advantages of panel data arise from both the micro and time series aspects of the observations. This also leads us to consider why panel data are necessary to understand and interpret the time series behavior of aggregate statistics produced in cross-section establishment surveys and censuses. We find that typical homogeneity assumptions are likely to be inappropriate in a wide variety of applications. In particular, the industry in which an establishment is located, the ownership of the establishment, and the existence of the establishment (births and deaths) are endogenous variables that cannot simply be taken as time invariant fixed effects in econometric modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring The Trade Balance In Advanced Technology Products

    January 1989

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-89-01

    Because of the dramatic decline in the United States Trade Balance since the early 1970's, many economists and policy makers have become increasingly concerned about the ability of U.S. manufacturers to compete with foreign producers. Initially concern was limited to a few basic industries such as shoes, clothing, and steel; but more recently foreign producers have been effectively competing with U.S. manufacturers in automobiles, electronics, and other consumer products. It now seems that foreign producers are even challenging the dominance of America in high technology industries. The most recent publication from the International Trade Administration shows that the U.S. Trade Balance in high technology industries fell from a $24 billion surplus in 1982, to a $2.6 billion deficit in 1986, before rebounding to a $591 million surplus in 1987. As part of the efforts of the U.S. Census Bureau to provide policy makers and other interested parties with the most complete and accurate information possible, we recently completed a review of the methodology and data used to construct trade statistics in the area of high technology trade. Our findings suggest that the statistics presented by the International Trade Administration, although technically correct, do not provide an accurate picture of international trade in high or advanced technology products because of the level of aggregation used in their construction. The ITA statistics are based on the Department of Commerce's DOC3 definition of high technology industries. The DOC3 definition requires that each product classified in a high tech industry be designated high tech. As a result, many products which would not individually be considered high tech are included in the statistics. After developing a disaggregate, product- based measure of international trade in Advanced Technology Products (ATP), we find that although the trade balance in these products did decline over the 1982-1987 period, the decline is much smaller (about $5 billion) than reported by ITA (approximately $24 billion). This paper discusses the methodology used to define the ATP measure, contrasts it to the DOC3 measure, and provides a comparison of the resulting statistics. After discussing alternative approaches to identifying advanced technology products, Section 2 describes the advanced technologies in the classification. (Appendix A, provides definitions and examples of the products which embody these technologies. In addition, Appendix B, available on request, provides a comprehensive list of Advanced Technology Products by technology grouping.) Having described the ATPs, Section 3 examines annual trade statistics for ATP products, in 1982, 1986, and 1987, and compares these statistics with equivalent ones based on the DOC3 measure. The differences between the two measures over the 1982- 87 period stem from changes in the balance of trade of items included in the DOC3 measure but excluded by the Census ATP measure; i.e. the differences are due to changes in the trade balance of "low tech" products which are produced in "high tech" industries. This finding corroborates a principal argument for construction of the ATP measure, that the weakness of the DOC3 measure of high technology trade is the level of aggregation used in its construction. It also suggests that at the level of individual products the high technology sectors of the economy continue to enjoy a strong comparative advantage and are surprisingly healthy. Nonetheless, some areas of weakness are identified, such as low tech products in high tech industries. (Appendix C, supplements this material by providing a detailed listing of traded products included and excluded from the Advanced Technology definition for each DOC3 high tech commodity grouping. These Tables enable the reader to directly assess the Census classification.)
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Long-Run Expectations And Capacity

    April 1988

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-88-01

    In this paper, we argue at a general level, that recent economic models of capacity and of its utilization are deficient because they do not adequately take into account firms' long-run expectations about conditions which are pertinent to their investment decisions, i.e., their decisions about altering productive capacity. We argue that the problem with these models is that they rely on the two conventional definitions of capacity which ignore these long-run expectations. Accordingly, we propose a third definition of capacity which incorporates these expectations and, thereby, corrects the problem. Furthermore, we argue that a correct, empirical analysis with the proposed definition -- indeed, any credible analysis of capacity or its utilization -- must take into account the demand for the output produced by the firms being studied. Finally, we apply the definition to clarify the meaning of surveys of capacity and, thus, show how it can be used to improve future surveys of capacity.
    View Full Paper PDF