CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Internal Revenue Service'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 132

American Community Survey - 121

Social Security Administration - 120

Center for Economic Studies - 115

Longitudinal Business Database - 112

North American Industry Classification System - 110

Protected Identification Key - 108

Current Population Survey - 105

Employer Identification Numbers - 104

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 100

Social Security Number - 95

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 88

Social Security - 84

Business Register - 69

Disclosure Review Board - 66

National Science Foundation - 65

Decennial Census - 64

Ordinary Least Squares - 62

W-2 - 61

Standard Industrial Classification - 60

Person Validation System - 53

Economic Census - 53

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 52

National Bureau of Economic Research - 47

Census Bureau Business Register - 47

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 47

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 46

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 44

2010 Census - 42

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 42

Master Address File - 40

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 39

County Business Patterns - 37

Business Dynamics Statistics - 37

Person Identification Validation System - 35

Census of Manufactures - 33

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 33

Census Numident - 32

Research Data Center - 31

Service Annual Survey - 31

Characteristics of Business Owners - 30

Small Business Administration - 29

Adjusted Gross Income - 29

Federal Reserve Bank - 29

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 29

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 29

Office of Management and Budget - 28

Total Factor Productivity - 28

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 28

Longitudinal Research Database - 28

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 27

Unemployment Insurance - 27

Personally Identifiable Information - 27

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 24

Housing and Urban Development - 24

Postal Service - 24

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 23

University of Chicago - 23

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 22

Cornell University - 22

Special Sworn Status - 22

Department of Labor - 21

Earned Income Tax Credit - 21

Federal Reserve System - 21

National Center for Health Statistics - 21

Indian Health Service - 20

Company Organization Survey - 19

COVID-19 - 19

PSID - 19

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 18

Department of Homeland Security - 18

Data Management System - 17

SSA Numident - 17

Detailed Earnings Records - 17

Medicaid Services - 16

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 16

Individual Characteristics File - 16

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 16

International Trade Research Report - 16

Administrative Records - 16

Survey of Business Owners - 15

Disability Insurance - 15

Census Household Composition Key - 15

Employer Characteristics File - 15

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 15

Department of Commerce - 15

Permanent Plant Number - 15

Social and Economic Supplement - 14

ASEC - 14

General Accounting Office - 14

Department of Education - 14

University of Maryland - 14

Core Based Statistical Area - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

National Institutes of Health - 13

Board of Governors - 13

Centers for Medicare - 13

Securities and Exchange Commission - 13

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Kauffman Foundation - 13

Census Bureau Master Address File - 12

Russell Sage Foundation - 12

University of Michigan - 12

Office of Personnel Management - 12

Patent and Trademark Office - 12

Stanford University - 12

Cobb-Douglas - 12

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Local Employment Dynamics - 12

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 12

Department of Economics - 12

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 12

American Economic Association - 12

MAFID - 11

Urban Institute - 11

New York University - 11

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 11

Composite Person Record - 11

MAF-ARF - 11

Federal Tax Information - 11

Retail Trade - 11

American Housing Survey - 11

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 11

CPS ASEC - 10

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

Form W-2 - 10

Supreme Court - 10

Some Other Race - 10

Business Employment Dynamics - 10

Employment History File - 10

Business Formation Statistics - 10

UC Berkeley - 10

Technical Services - 10

National Employer Survey - 10

LEHD Program - 10

Accommodation and Food Services - 10

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 10

Center for Administrative Records Research - 10

Master Beneficiary Record - 10

National Opinion Research Center - 10

Initial Public Offering - 10

Business Master File - 10

Department of Agriculture - 9

1940 Census - 9

Population Estimates Program - 9

Linear Probability Models - 9

DOB - 9

Environmental Protection Agency - 9

Boston College - 9

Center for Research in Security Prices - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Arts, Entertainment - 9

Department of Defense - 9

Indian Housing Information Center - 9

Selective Service System - 9

Review of Economics and Statistics - 9

National Institute on Aging - 9

Yale University - 9

Bureau of Labor - 9

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 9

Limited Liability Company - 8

Multiple Worksite Report - 8

PIKed - 8

Survey of Consumer Finances - 8

Cumulative Density Function - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Census Edited File - 8

Duke University - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Public Administration - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

American Economic Review - 8

American Statistical Association - 8

Annual Business Survey - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

Wholesale Trade - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

CDF - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

Sloan Foundation - 7

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Harmonized System - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Master Earnings File - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Georgetown University - 7

Journal of Human Resources - 7

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

NBER Summer Institute - 6

Agriculture, Forestry - 6

Federal Poverty Level - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

2SLS - 6

Health and Retirement Study - 6

Columbia University - 6

Educational Services - 6

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

Census 2000 - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 6

Current Employment Statistics - 6

Establishment Micro Properties - 6

Census of Retail Trade - 6

Securities Data Company - 6

Federal Register - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Business Services - 5

AKM - 5

George Mason University - 5

World Trade Organization - 5

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 5

Guzman and Stern - 5

COVID - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

National Research Council - 5

United States Census Bureau - 5

Occupational Employment Statistics - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Health Care and Social Assistance - 5

HHS - 5

Paycheck Protection Program - 5

Department of State - 5

Kauffman Firm Survey - 5

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 5

CATI - 5

New York Times - 5

Regression Discontinuity Design - 5

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 5

Stern School of Business - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

CAAA - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Northwestern University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

WECD - 5

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 4

Professional Services - 4

University of Texas - 4

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 4

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 4

LODES - 4

Ohio State University - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Foreign Direct Investment - 4

IQR - 4

Federal Statistical System - 4

E32 - 4

Labor Productivity - 4

Summary Earnings Records - 4

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 4

Journal of Political Economy - 4

MIT Press - 4

COMPUSTAT - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

World Bank - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Hypothesis 2 - 3

North American Free Trade Agreement - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Research and Development - 3

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

University of Toronto - 3

Food and Nutrition Service - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Pew Research Center - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

General Social Survey - 3

IZA - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Federal Government - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Energy Information Administration - 3

United Nations - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

European Union - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

TFPQ - 3

Journal of International Economics - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

John Voorheis - 22

Maggie R. Jones - 16

John Haltiwanger - 16

Martha Stinson - 15

Javier Miranda - 13

John M. Abowd - 12

Lucia Foster - 11

J. David Brown - 10

Ron Jarmin - 10

Emin Dinlersoz - 9

Leah R. Clark - 9

Alicia Robb - 9

Adela Luque - 8

Sonya R. Porter - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Timothy Bates - 8

Kevin Rinz - 7

Andrew Penner - 7

Christopher Goetz - 7

Randall Akee - 7

Thomas B. Foster - 7

Jonathan Eggleston - 7

Lars Vilhuber - 7

Danielle H. Sandler - 6

Kristin Sandusky - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Moises Yi - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 6

Quentin Brummet - 5

Emily Penner - 5

Mark J. Kutzbach - 5

Thurston Domina - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Jonathan Colmer - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Jerome P. Reiter - 5

Julia I. Lane - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Robert Fairlie - 5

Alfred R Nucci - 5

Ethan Krohn - 4

Henry Hyatt - 4

Ariel J. Binder - 4

Michelle Spiegel - 4

Paul Y. Yoo - 4

Joseph Staudt - 4

T. Kirk White - 4

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Mark Ellis - 4

Lee Fiorio - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Kendall Houghton - 4

Carl Lieberman - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Nathan Goldschlag - 4

Timothy Dunne - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Erika McEntarfer - 4

Fariha Kamal - 4

James M. Noon - 4

Shawn Klimek - 4

Cheryl Grim - 4

C.J. Krizan - 4

Thomas Chemmanur - 4

Charles Hokayem - 3

Ciyata Coleman - 3

Sanghun (Eric) Kim - 3

Krishnan Patel - 3

Dean Plueger - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

Andrew Keller - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Abigail Wozniak - 3

Liana Christin Landivar - 3

Paul Hanselman - 3

Andrew Foote - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Hubert P. Janicki - 3

James R. Spletzer - 3

Joshua Mitchell - 3

Adam Bee - 3

Sabrina T. Howell - 3

Veronika Penciakova - 3

Caroline Walker - 3

Leticia Fernandez - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Daniel Weinberg - 3

Deborah Wagner - 3

Paige Ouimet - 3

Richard Burkhauser - 3

Shuaizhang Feng - 3

Stephen Jenkins - 3

Jeff Larrimore - 3

Debarshi Nandy - 3

employed - 82

survey - 73

employ - 71

labor - 61

earnings - 61

respondent - 58

population - 55

recession - 55

irs - 52

workforce - 52

employee - 50

payroll - 47

enterprise - 47

entrepreneurship - 42

entrepreneur - 41

agency - 40

revenue - 39

census bureau - 39

disadvantaged - 37

tax - 36

ethnicity - 36

data - 36

econometric - 35

statistical - 35

census data - 35

estimating - 33

earner - 33

hispanic - 33

economist - 33

quarterly - 31

sale - 31

proprietorship - 31

minority - 30

socioeconomic - 30

data census - 30

disparity - 29

growth - 29

venture - 29

salary - 29

company - 29

sector - 28

expenditure - 28

record - 27

proprietor - 27

poverty - 27

establishment - 26

ethnic - 26

report - 26

macroeconomic - 26

1040 - 25

enrollment - 25

corporation - 25

entrepreneurial - 25

immigrant - 25

manufacturing - 24

filing - 23

resident - 23

residence - 23

microdata - 23

taxpayer - 22

racial - 21

gdp - 21

employment data - 21

worker - 21

federal - 20

incentive - 20

coverage - 20

residential - 20

market - 20

financial - 20

production - 20

datasets - 20

use census - 19

hiring - 19

welfare - 19

unemployed - 19

family - 18

imputation - 18

aggregate - 18

migrant - 18

disclosure - 18

incorporated - 18

industrial - 18

citizen - 18

assessed - 17

housing - 17

economically - 17

insurance - 17

medicaid - 17

intergenerational - 17

migration - 17

job - 17

longitudinal - 17

economic census - 17

estimation - 16

occupation - 16

earn - 16

race - 16

neighborhood - 15

census employment - 15

investment - 15

endogeneity - 15

acquisition - 15

wealth - 14

income data - 14

export - 14

trend - 14

state - 14

employment statistics - 14

ssa - 14

immigration - 14

eligibility - 13

segregation - 13

bias - 13

percentile - 13

database - 13

census survey - 13

black - 13

statistician - 13

eligible - 12

discrimination - 12

census use - 12

organizational - 12

corporate - 12

finance - 12

white - 12

enrolled - 12

merger - 12

employee data - 12

census research - 11

mobility - 11

debt - 11

opportunity - 11

environmental - 11

innovation - 11

analysis - 11

study - 11

retirement - 11

work census - 11

startup - 11

employment growth - 11

dependent - 11

impact - 11

employing - 11

researcher - 11

metropolitan - 11

ownership - 11

census records - 10

labor statistics - 10

spillover - 10

medicare - 10

generation - 10

rent - 10

migrate - 10

migrating - 10

matching - 10

borrower - 10

loan - 10

information census - 10

layoff - 10

child - 9

census business - 9

records census - 9

census responses - 9

linked census - 9

poorer - 9

lender - 9

relocation - 9

moving - 9

lending - 9

inventory - 9

efficiency - 9

accounting - 9

department - 9

employment dynamics - 9

subsidy - 9

bank - 9

confidentiality - 9

public - 9

heterogeneity - 9

exemption - 9

firms census - 9

multinational - 9

depreciation - 9

owned businesses - 9

produce - 9

decline - 8

2010 census - 8

education - 8

sampling - 8

enrollee - 8

shock - 8

econometrician - 8

household surveys - 8

leverage - 8

emission - 8

pollution - 8

taxable - 8

nonemployer businesses - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employment earnings - 8

employment estimates - 8

workplace - 8

longitudinal employer - 8

information - 8

parent - 8

survey income - 8

surveys censuses - 8

census household - 8

healthcare - 8

taxation - 8

business data - 8

shareholder - 8

estimates employment - 8

filed - 7

declining - 7

unemployment rates - 7

restaurant - 7

woman - 7

school - 7

mortality - 7

gender - 7

home - 7

renter - 7

mortgage - 7

profit - 7

earnings employees - 7

uninsured - 7

bankruptcy - 7

shift - 7

patent - 7

patenting - 7

pension - 7

associate - 7

research census - 7

provided census - 7

recessionary - 7

business startups - 7

native - 7

turnover - 7

employment trends - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

funding - 7

privacy - 7

publicly - 7

census years - 7

census linked - 7

parental - 7

tenure - 7

mexican - 7

poor - 7

insured - 7

health insurance - 7

retail - 7

demand - 7

employment wages - 7

state employment - 7

exporter - 7

founder - 7

investor - 7

owner - 7

business owners - 7

characteristics businesses - 7

aggregation - 7

profitability - 7

credit - 6

census disclosure - 6

rural - 6

schooling - 6

educational - 6

estimates census - 6

income households - 6

establishments data - 6

exogeneity - 6

regress - 6

fertility - 6

technological - 6

monopolistic - 6

prevalence - 6

productive - 6

reporting - 6

adoption - 6

graduate - 6

subsidiary - 6

identifier - 6

manufacturer - 6

wholesale - 6

worker demographics - 6

student - 6

income children - 6

banking - 6

warehousing - 6

segregated - 6

aging - 6

residing - 6

income distributions - 6

assessing - 6

race census - 6

workers earnings - 6

transition - 6

discrepancy - 6

survey data - 6

employer household - 6

foreign - 6

asian - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

businesses census - 6

clerical - 6

regional - 6

regression - 6

census file - 6

rates employment - 6

research - 6

statistical agencies - 6

minority business - 5

educated - 5

household income - 5

employment count - 5

wage earnings - 5

earnings workers - 5

employment firms - 5

policy - 5

geography - 5

estimates intergenerational - 5

creditor - 5

grandparent - 5

adopt - 5

trends employment - 5

borrowing - 5

family income - 5

parents income - 5

university - 5

earns - 5

productivity growth - 5

census 2020 - 5

country - 5

effects employment - 5

crime - 5

wages productivity - 5

productivity dynamics - 5

compensation - 5

income individuals - 5

expense - 5

geographic - 5

pollution exposure - 5

census estimates - 5

import - 5

pandemic - 5

income survey - 5

pollutant - 5

geographically - 5

hurricane - 5

saving - 5

retiree - 5

small firms - 5

prospect - 5

corp - 5

estimator - 5

insurance employer - 5

empirical - 5

employment measures - 5

yearly - 5

customer - 5

health - 5

exporting - 5

classified - 5

firms export - 5

employment unemployment - 5

franchising - 5

stock - 5

industry productivity - 5

relocating - 5

insurance coverage - 5

econometrically - 5

mandate - 4

average - 4

homeowner - 4

benefit - 4

income housing - 4

applicant - 4

college - 4

career - 4

adulthood - 4

linkage - 4

epa - 4

innovate - 4

innovative - 4

disability - 4

www census - 4

income white - 4

wage gap - 4

institutional - 4

earnings gap - 4

estimates productivity - 4

consolidated - 4

small businesses - 4

childcare - 4

invention - 4

region - 4

indian - 4

relocate - 4

hire - 4

grade - 4

affluent - 4

sample - 4

survey households - 4

population survey - 4

financing - 4

security - 4

exposure - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

available census - 4

maternal - 4

locality - 4

startup firms - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

earnings inequality - 4

competitor - 4

earnings mobility - 4

individuals census - 4

shipment - 4

trading - 4

exporting firms - 4

wage changes - 4

union - 4

employment recession - 4

franchise - 4

franchisor - 4

franchised businesses - 4

franchise establishments - 4

wage data - 4

business survival - 4

regulation - 4

takeover - 4

conglomerate - 4

discriminatory - 3

employment declines - 3

sample census - 3

endogenous - 3

policymakers - 3

grocery - 3

amenity - 3

liquidation - 3

unobserved - 3

borrow - 3

technology - 3

advancement - 3

measures productivity - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

employed census - 3

labor markets - 3

effect wages - 3

growth productivity - 3

employees startups - 3

startups employees - 3

area - 3

specialization - 3

agriculture - 3

fund - 3

consumption - 3

concentration - 3

tariff - 3

propensity - 3

neighbor - 3

latino - 3

firms size - 3

income year - 3

disaster - 3

birth - 3

commerce - 3

distribution - 3

degree - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

restriction - 3

insurance premiums - 3

insurer - 3

matched - 3

recession exposure - 3

regressing - 3

cohort - 3

productivity estimates - 3

productivity capital - 3

immigrated - 3

employment production - 3

earnings age - 3

retailer - 3

volatility - 3

importer - 3

custom - 3

industry employment - 3

increase employment - 3

impact employment - 3

wages employment - 3

earnings growth - 3

wage regressions - 3

assimilation - 3

fluctuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

exported - 3

exports firms - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

equity - 3

employment effects - 3

subsidized - 3

larger firms - 3

productivity shocks - 3

ethnically - 3

wage effects - 3

urban - 3

analyst - 3

growth firms - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

demography - 3

partnership - 3

coverage employer - 3

store - 3

development - 3

employment flows - 3

younger firms - 3

firm growth - 3

firms grow - 3

firms employment - 3

managerial - 3

buyer - 3

cost - 3

profitable - 3

plants industry - 3

compliance - 3

technical - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 334


  • Working Paper

    Understanding Criminal Record Penalties in the Labor Market

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-39

    This paper studies the earnings and employment penalties associated with a criminal record. Using a large-scale dataset linking criminal justice and employer-employee wage records, we estimate two-way fixed effects models that decompose earnings into worker's portable earnings potential and firm pay premia, both of which are allowed to shift after a worker acquires a record. We find that firm pay premia explain a small share of earnings gaps between workers with and without a record. There is little evidence of variable within-firm premia gaps either. Instead, components of workers' earnings potential that persist across firms explain the bulk of gaps. Conditional on earnings potential, workers with a record are also substantially less likely to be employed. Difference-in-differences estimates comparing workers' first conviction to workers charged but not convicted or charged later support these findings. The results suggest that criminal record penalties operate primarily by changing whether workers are employed and their earnings potential at every firm rather than increasing sorting into lower-paying jobs, although the bulk of gaps can be attributed to differences that existed prior to acquiring a record.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Rise of Industrial AI in America: Microfoundations of the Productivity J-curve(s)

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-27

    We examine the prevalence and productivity dynamics of artificial intelligence (AI) in American manufacturing. Working with the Census Bureau to collect detailed large-scale data for 2017 and 2021, we focus on AI-related technologies with industrial applications. We find causal evidence of J-curve-shaped returns, where short-term performance losses precede longer-term gains. Consistent with costly adjustment taking place within core production processes, industrial AI use increases work-in-progress inventory, investment in industrial robots, and labor shedding, while harming productivity and profitability in the short run. These losses are unevenly distributed, concentrating among older businesses while being mitigated by growth-oriented business strategies and within-firm spillovers. Dynamics, however, matter: earlier (pre-2017) adopters exhibit stronger growth over time, conditional on survival. Notably, among older establishments, abandonment of structured production-management practices accounts for roughly one-third of these losses, revealing a specific channel through which intangible factors shape AI's impact. Taken together, these results provide novel evidence on the microfoundations of technology J-curves, identifying mechanisms and illuminating how and why they differ across firm types. These findings extend our understanding of modern General Purpose Technologies, explaining why their economic impact'exemplified here by AI'may initially disappoint, particularly in contexts dominated by older, established firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Startup Dynamics: Transitioning from Nonemployer Firms to Employer Firms, Survival, and Job Creation

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-26

    Understanding the dynamics of startup businesses' growth, exit, and survival is crucial for fostering entrepreneurship. Among the nearly 30 million registered businesses in the United States, fewer than six million have employees beyond the business owners. This research addresses the gap in understanding which companies transition to employer businesses and the mechanisms behind this process. Job creation remains a critical concern for policymakers, researchers, and advocacy groups. This study aims to illuminate the transition from non-employer businesses to employer businesses and explore job creation by new startups. Leveraging newly available microdata from the U.S. Census Bureau, we seek to gain deeper insights into firm survival, job creation by startups, and the transition from non-employer to employer status.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Place Based Economic Development and Tribal Casinos

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-24

    Tribal lands in the U.S. have historically experienced some of the worst economic conditions in the nation. We review some existing research on the effect of American Indian tribal casinos on various measures of local economic development. This is an industry that began in the early 1990s and currently generates more than $40 billion annually. We also review the state of the literature on the effects of casino operations on communities in or adjacent to tribal areas. Using a new dataset linking individual and enterprise-level data longitudinally, this study examines the industry- and location-specific impacts of tribal casino operations. We focus in particular on the employment of American Indians. We document positive flows from unemployment and non-casino geographies to work in sectors related to casino operations. Tribal casinos differ from other standard place-based economic development projects in that they are focused on a single industry; we discuss these differences and note that some of the positive spillover effects may be similar to other, more standard place-based policies. Finally, we discuss additional and open-ended questions for future research on this topic.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Composition of Firm Workforces from 2006'2022: Findings from the Business Dynamics Statistics of Human Capital Experimental Product

    April 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-20

    We introduce the Business Dynamics Statistics of Human Capital (BDS-HC) tables, a new Census Bureau experimental product that provides public-use statistics on the workforce composition of firms and its relationship to business dynamics. We use administrative W-2 filings to combine population-level worker demographic data with longitudinal business data to estimate the demographic and educational composition of nearly all non-farm employer businesses in the United States between 2006 and 2022. We use this newly constructed data to document the evolution of employment, entry, and exit of employers based on their workforce compositions. We also provide new statistics on the interaction between firm and worker characteristics, including the composition of workers at startup firms. We find substantial changes between 2006 and 2022 in the distribution of employers along several dimensions, primarily driven by changing workforce compositions within continuing firms rather than the reallocation of employment between firms. We also highlight systematic differences in the business dynamics of firms by their workforce compositions, suggesting that different groups of workers face different economic environments due to their employers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Geographic Immobility in the United States: Assessing the Prevalence and Characteristics of Those Who Never Migrate Across State Lines Using Linked Federal Tax Microdata

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-19

    This paper explores the prevalence and characteristics of those who never migrate at the state scale in the U.S. Studying people who never migrate requires regular and frequent observation of their residential location for a lifetime, or at least for many years. A novel U.S. population-sized longitudinal dataset that links individual level Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) administrative records supplies this information annually, along with information on income and socio-demographic characteristics. We use these administrative microdata to follow a cohort aged between 15 and 50 in 2001 from 2001 to 2016, differentiating those who lived in the same state every year during this period (i.e., never made an interstate move) from those who lived in more than one state (i.e., made at least one interstate move). We find those who never made an interstate move comprised 75 percent of the total population of this age cohort. This percentage varies by year of age but never falls below 62 percent even for those who were teenagers or young adults in 2001. There are also variations in these percentages by sex, race, nativity, and income, with the latter having the largest effects. We also find substantial variation in these percentages across states. Our findings suggest a need for more research on geographically immobile populations in U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Work Organization and Cumulative Advantage

    March 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-18

    Over decades of wage stagnation, researchers have argued that reorganizing work can boost pay for disadvantaged workers. But upgrading jobs could inadvertently shift hiring away from those workers, exacerbating their disadvantage. We theorize how work organization affects cumulative advantage in the labor market, or the extent to which high-paying positions are increasingly allocated to already-advantaged workers. Specifically, raising technical skill demands exacerbates cumulative advantage by shifting hiring towards higher-skilled applicants. In contrast, when employers increase autonomy or skills learned on-the-job, they raise wages to buy worker consent or commitment, rather than pre-existing skill. To test this idea, we match administrative earnings to task descriptions from job posts. We compare earnings for workers hired into the same occupation and firm, but under different task allocations. When employers raise complexity and autonomy, new hires' starting earnings increase and grow faster. However, while the earnings boost from complex, technical tasks shifts employment toward workers with higher prior earnings, worker selection changes less for tasks learned on-the-job and very little for high autonomy tasks. These results demonstrate how reorganizing work can interrupt cumulative advantage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Peer Income Exposure Across the Income Distribution

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-16

    Children from families across the income distribution attend public schools, making schools and classrooms potential sites for interaction between more- and less-affluent children. However, limited information exists regarding the extent of economic integration in these contexts. We merge educational administrative data from Oregon with measures of family income derived from IRS records to document student exposure to economically diverse school and classroom peers. Our findings indicate that affluent children in public schools are relatively isolated from their less affluent peers, while low- and middle-income students experience relatively even peer income distributions. Students from families in the top percentile of the income distribution attend schools where 20 percent of their peers, on average, come from the top five income percentiles. A large majority of the differences in peer exposure that we observe arise from the sorting of students across schools; sorting across classrooms within schools plays a substantially smaller role.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Design of Sampling Strata for the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-13

    The National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) and Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), examines the food purchasing behavior of various subgroups of the U.S. population. These subgroups include participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), as well as households who are eligible for but don't participate in these programs. Participants in these social protection programs constitute small proportions of the U.S. population; obtaining an adequate number of such participants in a survey would be challenging absent stratified sampling to target SNAP and WIC participating households. This document describes how the U.S. Census Bureau (which is planning to conduct future versions of the FoodAPS survey on behalf of USDA) created sampling strata to flag the FoodAPS targeted subpopulations using machine learning applications in linked survey and administrative data. We describe the data, modeling techniques, and how well the sampling flags target low-income households and households receiving WIC and SNAP benefits. We additionally situate these efforts in the nascent literature on the use of big data and machine learning for the improvement of survey efficiency.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    U.S. Banks' Artificial Intelligence and Small Business Lending: Evidence from the Census Bureau's Annual Business Survey

    February 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-07

    Utilizing confidential microdata from the Census Bureau's new technology survey (technology module of the Annual Business Survey), we shed light on U.S. banks' use of artificial intelligence (AI) and its effect on their small business lending. We find that the percentage of banks using AI increases from 14% in 2017 to 43% in 2019. Linking banks' AI use to their small business lending, we find that banks with greater AI usage lend significantly more to distant borrowers, about whom they have less soft information. Using an instrumental variable based on banks' proximity to AI vendors, we show that AI's effect is likely causal. In contrast, we do not find similar effects for cloud systems, other types of software, or hardware surveyed by Census, highlighting AI's uniqueness. Moreover, AI's effect on distant lending is more pronounced in poorer areas and areas with less bank presence. Last, we find that banks with greater AI usage experience lower default rates among distant borrowers and charge these borrowers lower interest rates, suggesting that AI helps banks identify creditworthy borrowers at loan origination. Overall, our evidence suggests that AI helps banks reduce information asymmetry with borrowers, thereby enabling them to extend credit over greater distances.
    View Full Paper PDF