CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Current Population Survey'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 116

Internal Revenue Service - 101

Social Security Administration - 92

American Community Survey - 92

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 87

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 78

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 78

Protected Identification Key - 76

Social Security - 74

Social Security Number - 64

Center for Economic Studies - 64

National Science Foundation - 61

Ordinary Least Squares - 61

North American Industry Classification System - 58

Longitudinal Business Database - 53

Decennial Census - 51

Standard Industrial Classification - 45

Employer Identification Numbers - 44

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 44

Disclosure Review Board - 38

Person Validation System - 37

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 36

Federal Reserve Bank - 36

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 35

Cornell University - 35

Business Register - 34

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 34

2010 Census - 33

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 33

National Bureau of Economic Research - 31

Unemployment Insurance - 30

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 30

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 28

W-2 - 26

PSID - 25

Department of Labor - 24

Economic Census - 24

Social and Economic Supplement - 23

Person Identification Validation System - 23

Census Bureau Business Register - 23

Office of Management and Budget - 23

Special Sworn Status - 23

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 23

Service Annual Survey - 22

University of Chicago - 22

Master Address File - 21

Census of Manufactures - 21

Detailed Earnings Records - 20

University of Maryland - 20

Personally Identifiable Information - 20

Research Data Center - 20

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 19

ASEC - 18

Earned Income Tax Credit - 18

1940 Census - 17

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 17

Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

National Institute on Aging - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 16

LEHD Program - 16

Local Employment Dynamics - 16

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 15

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 15

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 15

Total Factor Productivity - 14

SSA Numident - 14

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 14

Journal of Economic Literature - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 13

Adjusted Gross Income - 13

Disability Insurance - 13

American Housing Survey - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Federal Reserve System - 13

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 13

Census 2000 - 13

National Center for Health Statistics - 12

Individual Characteristics File - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Housing and Urban Development - 12

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 12

Census Numident - 12

Administrative Records - 12

Department of Health and Human Services - 12

Business Employment Dynamics - 12

CPS ASEC - 11

International Trade Research Report - 11

County Business Patterns - 11

Center for Administrative Records Research - 11

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 11

Core Based Statistical Area - 11

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 11

Office of Personnel Management - 10

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 10

Department of Agriculture - 10

AKM - 10

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 10

Medicaid Services - 10

Labor Turnover Survey - 10

National Health Interview Survey - 10

American Economic Review - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 9

Department of Economics - 9

General Accounting Office - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

Urban Institute - 9

Standard Occupational Classification - 9

Occupational Employment Statistics - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

JOLTS - 9

Employment History File - 9

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

MAFID - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Supreme Court - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 8

Journal of Labor Economics - 8

Employer Characteristics File - 8

COVID-19 - 7

Social Security Disability Insurance - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

NBER Summer Institute - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Economic Research Service - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

PIKed - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Society of Labor Economists - 7

Bureau of Labor - 7

University of Michigan - 7

Some Other Race - 7

New York University - 7

Public Use Micro Sample - 7

National Academy of Sciences - 7

Census Edited File - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 7

Census Industry Code - 7

Boston College - 7

Council of Economic Advisers - 7

Retail Trade - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

National Opinion Research Center - 7

Current Employment Statistics - 7

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

United States Census Bureau - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 6

Data Management System - 6

Census Household Composition Key - 6

New York Times - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 6

CATI - 6

Business Register Bridge - 6

University of Minnesota - 6

Journal of Human Resources - 6

Review of Economics and Statistics - 6

Harvard University - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Permanent Plant Number - 6

BLS Handbook of Methods - 6

WECD - 6

Department of Education - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Yale University - 5

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Stanford University - 5

MAF-ARF - 5

Pew Research Center - 5

Indian Housing Information Center - 5

Master Earnings File - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Department of Defense - 5

HHS - 5

2SLS - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Business Master File - 5

Federal Government - 5

Regional Economic Information System - 5

Journal of Political Economy - 5

MIT Press - 5

Summary Earnings Records - 5

Boston Research Data Center - 5

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

General Education Development - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

Technical Services - 4

NUMIDENT - 4

Federal Register - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Business Services - 4

Professional Services - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Board of Governors - 4

Federal Trade Commission - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Linear Probability Models - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Census of Retail Trade - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Sample Edited Detail File - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

National Employer Survey - 3

Postal Service - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

University of Toronto - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

George Mason University - 3

Princeton University - 3

European Commission - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

World Bank - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

CAAA - 3

Sloan Foundation - 3

Probability Density Function - 3

IQR - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Public Administration - 3

VAR - 3

National Research Council - 3

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 3

TFPQ - 3

employed - 104

labor - 97

workforce - 85

employ - 85

survey - 77

earnings - 74

recession - 64

population - 60

employee - 60

respondent - 59

economist - 50

payroll - 47

salary - 44

worker - 44

census bureau - 40

earner - 37

job - 37

estimating - 34

unemployed - 33

econometric - 33

poverty - 32

hiring - 31

census data - 31

occupation - 28

statistical - 26

expenditure - 25

data - 24

data census - 24

macroeconomic - 24

welfare - 23

hispanic - 23

irs - 23

agency - 22

insurance - 22

trend - 22

quarterly - 22

ethnicity - 21

resident - 21

heterogeneity - 21

endogeneity - 21

minority - 20

disadvantaged - 20

enrollment - 20

residence - 20

earn - 20

employment dynamics - 20

coverage - 19

unemployment rates - 19

estimation - 19

revenue - 19

layoff - 19

immigrant - 19

medicaid - 19

socioeconomic - 19

tax - 19

census employment - 19

hire - 18

percentile - 18

labor statistics - 18

ethnic - 17

survey income - 17

retirement - 17

industrial - 16

growth - 16

residential - 16

shift - 16

longitudinal - 16

estimates employment - 16

employment statistics - 15

disparity - 15

report - 15

household surveys - 15

housing - 15

manufacturing - 15

migration - 15

migrant - 15

tenure - 15

workplace - 15

ssa - 14

eligibility - 14

citizen - 14

sector - 14

assessed - 14

imputation - 14

immigration - 14

research census - 14

entrepreneur - 13

entrepreneurship - 13

employment data - 13

incentive - 13

racial - 13

race - 13

demand - 13

census survey - 13

market - 13

mobility - 13

taxpayer - 13

employment growth - 13

production - 13

employment earnings - 13

enterprise - 12

employment unemployment - 12

bias - 12

discrimination - 12

estimator - 12

sampling - 12

gdp - 12

family - 12

labor markets - 12

eligible - 12

aging - 12

1040 - 12

metropolitan - 12

work census - 12

economically - 12

employment wages - 12

employing - 12

filing - 11

disability - 11

prevalence - 11

neighborhood - 11

intergenerational - 11

migrating - 11

datasets - 11

federal - 11

use census - 11

income data - 11

medicare - 11

establishment - 11

workers earnings - 11

employment estimates - 11

clerical - 11

employer household - 11

longitudinal employer - 11

census research - 11

employee data - 11

state employment - 10

health - 10

pandemic - 10

average - 10

poorer - 10

investment - 10

innovation - 10

moving - 10

migrate - 10

microdata - 10

mexican - 10

turnover - 10

entrepreneurial - 9

benefit - 9

aggregate - 9

population survey - 9

relocation - 9

state - 9

income survey - 9

pension - 9

census responses - 9

native - 9

economic census - 9

segregation - 9

home - 9

ancestry - 9

yearly - 9

sale - 9

wage changes - 9

regress - 9

uninsured - 9

econometrician - 9

employment flows - 9

effects employment - 8

union - 8

compensation - 8

rates employment - 8

rural - 8

technological - 8

relocate - 8

company - 8

financial - 8

subsidy - 8

survey households - 8

dependent - 8

profit - 8

retiree - 8

record - 8

matching - 8

race census - 8

recessionary - 8

decade - 8

assessing - 8

venture - 8

worker demographics - 8

trends employment - 8

recession employment - 8

insurance coverage - 8

efficiency - 8

endogenous - 8

produce - 8

proprietorship - 7

proprietor - 7

agriculture - 7

2010 census - 7

productive - 7

productivity growth - 7

parent - 7

parental - 7

unobserved - 7

spillover - 7

provided census - 7

employment trends - 7

discrepancy - 7

woman - 7

poor - 7

policy - 7

earnings workers - 7

wealth - 7

corporation - 7

coverage employer - 7

earnings employees - 7

earnings age - 7

effect wages - 7

wage data - 7

healthcare - 7

income year - 7

career - 6

incorporated - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

sample - 6

latino - 6

indian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

survey data - 6

rent - 6

generation - 6

adoption - 6

mortality - 6

cohort - 6

impact - 6

census linked - 6

wage growth - 6

saving - 6

census household - 6

exogeneity - 6

labor productivity - 6

white - 6

income distributions - 6

wage earnings - 6

associate - 6

organizational - 6

earnings inequality - 6

statistician - 6

workforce indicators - 6

regressing - 6

wages production - 6

trends labor - 6

enrollee - 6

exemption - 6

segregated - 6

insured - 6

inference - 6

income households - 6

health insurance - 6

schooling - 6

income individuals - 6

educated - 6

department - 5

residing - 5

endowment - 5

community - 5

profitability - 5

technology - 5

marriage - 5

citizenship - 5

adulthood - 5

enrolled - 5

demography - 5

expense - 5

linked census - 5

industry wages - 5

transition - 5

earnings growth - 5

disclosure - 5

analysis - 5

distribution - 5

census use - 5

ownership - 5

merger - 5

accounting - 5

surveys censuses - 5

records census - 5

fiscal - 5

industry employment - 5

regression - 5

wage regressions - 5

wage industries - 5

employment recession - 5

fertility - 5

census file - 5

retail - 5

researcher - 5

founder - 5

owned businesses - 5

relocating - 5

black - 5

insurance premiums - 5

insurance employer - 5

employment count - 5

study - 5

wages employment - 4

asian - 4

renter - 4

patent - 4

sector productivity - 4

reside - 4

specialization - 4

geographic - 4

urban - 4

city - 4

environmental - 4

census years - 4

outsourced - 4

finance - 4

database - 4

employment distribution - 4

autoregressive - 4

women earnings - 4

employment effects - 4

consumption - 4

information census - 4

corporate - 4

productivity measures - 4

productivity dynamics - 4

outsourcing - 4

immigrated - 4

assimilation - 4

information - 4

homeowner - 4

employment measures - 4

owner - 4

censuses surveys - 4

interracial - 4

earnings gap - 4

wage gap - 4

gender - 4

business data - 4

increase employment - 4

wage variation - 4

grocery - 4

industry productivity - 4

productivity variation - 4

wages productivity - 4

wage differences - 4

factory - 4

business owners - 4

census business - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

taxation - 4

matched - 4

utilization - 4

premium - 4

employment changes - 4

research - 4

household income - 4

education - 4

graduate - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

town - 3

sociology - 3

spending - 3

census 2020 - 3

factor productivity - 3

depreciation - 3

productivity shocks - 3

prospect - 3

divorced - 3

census records - 3

innovate - 3

patenting - 3

geographically - 3

risk - 3

amenity - 3

export - 3

tariff - 3

growth productivity - 3

capital productivity - 3

volatility - 3

income children - 3

firms census - 3

impact employment - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

inventory - 3

financing - 3

banking - 3

ethnically - 3

classification - 3

bank - 3

pollution - 3

regional - 3

employed census - 3

businesses census - 3

consumer - 3

supermarket - 3

leverage - 3

measures productivity - 3

productivity dispersion - 3

social - 3

locality - 3

characteristics businesses - 3

heterogeneous - 3

regressors - 3

rate - 3

commute - 3

country - 3

wage effects - 3

declining - 3

decline - 3

suburb - 3

commodity - 3

subsidized - 3

retailer - 3

acquisition - 3

inflation - 3

restructuring - 3

insurer - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 283


  • Working Paper

    Urban-Biased Growth: A Macroeconomic Analysis

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-33

    After 1980, larger US cities experienced substantially faster wage growth than smaller ones. We show that this urban bias mainly reflected wage growth at large Business Services firms. These firms stand out through their high per-worker expenditure on information technology and disproportionate presence in big cities. We introduce a spatial model of investment-specific technical change that can rationalize these patterns. Using the model as an accounting framework, we find that the observed decline in the investment price of information technology capital explains most urban-biased growth by raising the profits of large Business Services firms in big cities.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Income of the Aged in Household Surveys: Evidence from Linked Administrative Records

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-32

    Research has shown that household survey estimates of retirement income (defined benefit pensions and defined contribution account withdrawals) suffer from substantial underreporting which biases downward measures of financial well-being among the aged. Using data from both the redesigned 2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), each matched with administrative records, we examine to what extent underreporting of retirement income affects key statistics such as reliance on Social Security benefits and poverty among the aged. We find that underreporting of retirement income is still prevalent in the CPS ASEC. While the HRS does a better job than the CPS ASEC in terms of capturing retirement income, it still falls considerably short compared to administrative records. Consequently, the relative importance of Social Security income remains overstated in household surveys'53 percent of elderly beneficiaries in the CPS ASEC and 49 percent in the HRS rely on Social Security for the majority of their incomes compared to 42 percent in the linked administrative data. The poverty rate for those aged 65 and over is also overstated'8.8 percent in the CPS ASEC and 7.4 percent in the HRS compared to 6.4 percent in the linked administrative data. Our results illustrate the effects of using alternative data sources in producing key statistics from the Social Security Administration's Income of the Aged publication.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Citizenship Question Effects on Household Survey Response

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-31

    Several small-sample studies have predicted that a citizenship question in the 2020 Census would cause a large drop in self-response rates. In contrast, minimal effects were found in Poehler et al.'s (2020) analysis of the 2019 Census Test randomized controlled trial (RCT). We reconcile these findings by analyzing associations between characteristics about the addresses in the 2019 Census Test and their response behavior by linking to independently constructed administrative data. We find significant heterogeneity in sensitivity to the citizenship question among households containing Hispanics, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens. Response drops the most for households containing noncitizens ineligible for a Social Security number (SSN). It falls more for households with Latin American-born immigrants than those with immigrants from other countries. Response drops less for households with U.S.-born Hispanics than households with noncitizens from Latin America. Reductions in responsiveness occur not only through lower unit self-response rates, but also by increased household roster omissions and internet break-offs. The inclusion of a citizenship question increases the undercount of households with noncitizens. Households with noncitizens also have much higher citizenship question item nonresponse rates than those only containing citizens. The use of tract-level characteristics and significant heterogeneity among Hispanics, the foreign-born, and noncitizens help explain why the effects found by Poehler et al. were so small. Linking administrative microdata with the RCT data expands what we can learn from the RCT.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Revisiting Methods to Assign Responses when Race and Hispanic Origin Reporting are Discrepant Across Administrative Records and Third Party Sources

    May 2024

    Authors: James M. Noon

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-26

    The Best Race and Ethnicity Administrative Records Composite file ('Best Race file') is an composite file which combines Census, federal, and Third Party Data (TPD) sources and applies business rules to assign race and ethnicity values to person records. The first version of the Best Race administrative records composite was first constructed in 2015 and subsequently updated each year to include more recent vintages, when available, of the data sources originally included in the composite file. Where updates were available for data sources, the most recent information for persons was retained, and the business rules were reapplied to assign a single race and single Hispanic origin value to each person record. The majority of person records on the Best Race file have consistent race and ethnicity information across data sources. Where there are discrepancies in responses across data sources, we apply a series of business rules to assign a single race and ethnicity to each record. To improve the quality of the Best Race administrative records composite, we have begun revising the business rules which were developed several years ago. This paper discusses the original business rules as well as the implemented changes and their impact on the composite file.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    U.S. Worker Mobility Across Establishments within Firms: Scope, Prevalence, and Effects on Worker Earnings

    May 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-24

    Multi-establishment firms account for around 60% of U.S. workers' primary employers, providing ample opportunity for workers to change their work location without changing their employer. Using U.S. matched employer-employee data, this paper analyzes workers' access to and use of such between-establishment job transitions, and estimates the effect on workers' earnings growth of greater access, as measured by proximity of employment at other within-firm establishments. While establishment transitions are not perfectly observed, we estimate that within-firm establishment transitions account for 7.8% percent of all job transitions and 18.2% of transitions originating from the largest firms. Using variation in worker's establishment locations within their firms' establishment network, we show that having a greater share of the firm's jobs in nearby establishments generates meaningful increases in workers' earnings: a worker at the 90th percentile of earnings gains from more proximate within-firm job opportunities can expect to enjoy 2% higher average earnings over the following five years than a worker at the 10th percentile with the same baseline earnings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Lifecycle Earnings Volatility

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-21

    We present new estimates of earnings volatility over time and the lifecycle for men and women by race and human capital. Using a long panel of restricted-access administrative Social Security earnings linked to the Current Population Survey, we estimate volatility with both transparent summary measures, as well as decompositions into permanent and transitory components. From the late 1970s to the mid 1990s there is a strong negative trend in earnings volatility for both men and women. We show this is driven by a reduction in transitory variance. Starting in the mid 1990s there is relative stability in trends of male earnings volatility because of an increase in the variance of permanent shocks, especially among workers without a college education, and a more attenuated trend decline among women. Cohort analyses indicate a strong U-shape pattern of volatility over the working life, which comes from large permanent shocks early and later in the lifecycle. However, this U-shape shifted downward and leftward in more recent cohorts, the latter from the fanning out of lifecycle transitory volatility in younger cohorts. These patterns are more pronounced among White men and women compared to Black workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where Are Your Parents? Exploring Potential Bias in Administrative Records on Children

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-18

    This paper examines potential bias in the Census Household Composition Key's (CHCK) probabilistic parent-child linkages. By linking CHCK data to the American Community Survey (ACS), we reveal disparities in parent-child linkages among specific demographic groups and find that characteristics of children that can and cannot be linked to the CHCK vary considerably from the larger population. In particular, we find that children from low-income, less educated households and of Hispanic origin are less likely to be linked to a mother or a father in the CHCK. We also highlight some data considerations when using the CHCK.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Long-Term Effects of Income for At-Risk Infants: Evidence from Supplemental Security Income

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-10

    This paper examines whether a generous cash intervention early in life can "undo" some of the long-term disadvantage associated with poor health at birth. We use new linkages between several large-scale administrative datasets to examine the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of providing low-income families with low birthweight infants support through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. This program uses a birthweight cutoff at 1200 grams to determine eligibility. We find that families of infants born just below this cutoff experience a large increase in cash benefits totaling about 27%of family income in the first three years of the infant's life. These cash benefits persist at lower amounts through age 10. Eligible infants also experience a small but statistically significant increase in Medicaid enrollment during childhood. We examine whether this support affects health care use and mortality in infancy, educational performance in high school, post-secondary school attendance and college degree attainment, and earnings, public assistance use, and mortality in young adulthood for all infants born in California to low-income families whose birthweight puts them near the cutoff. We also examine whether these payments had spillover effects onto the older siblings of these infants who may have also benefited from the increase in family resources. Despite the comprehensive nature of this early life intervention, we detect no improvements in any of the study outcomes, nor do we find improvements among the older siblings of these infants. These null effects persist across several subgroups and alternative model specifications, and, for some outcomes, our estimates are precise enough to rule out published estimates of the effect of early life cash transfers in other settings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Low-Wage Jobs, Foreign-Born Workers, and Firm Performance

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-05

    We examine how migrant workers impact firm performance using administrative data from the United States. Exploiting an unexpected change in firms' likelihood of securing low-wage workers through the H-2B visa program, we find limited crowd-out of other forms of employment and no impact on average pay at the firm. Yet, access to H-2B workers raises firms' annual revenues and survival likelihood. Our results are consistent with the notion that guest worker programs can help address labor shortages without inflicting large losses on incumbent workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Icing on the Cake: The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Income Data Quality in the SIPP

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-03

    Accurate measurement of key income variables plays a crucial role in economic research and policy decision-making. However, the presence of item nonresponse and measurement error in survey data can cause biased estimates. These biases can subsequently lead to sub-optimal policy decisions and inefficient allocation of resources. While there have been various studies documenting item nonresponse and measurement error in economic data, there have not been many studies investigating interventions that could reduce item nonresponse and measurement error. In our research, we investigate the impact of monetary incentives on reducing item nonresponse and measurement error for labor and investment income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Our study utilizes a randomized incentive experiment in Waves 1 and 2 of the 2014 SIPP, which allows us to assess the effectiveness of incentives in reducing item nonresponse and measurement error. We find that households receiving incentives had item nonresponse rates that are 1.3 percentage points lower for earnings and 1.5 percentage points lower for Social Security income. Measurement error was 6.31 percentage points lower at the intensive margin for interest income, and 16.48 percentage points lower for dividend income compared to non-incentive recipient households. These findings provide valuable insights for data producers and users and highlight the importance of implementing strategies to improve data quality in economic research.
    View Full Paper PDF