CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'American Economic Review'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Journal of Political Economy - 26

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 25

North American Industry Classification System - 24

Center for Economic Studies - 23

University of Chicago - 22

National Science Foundation - 21

National Bureau of Economic Research - 20

Review of Economics and Statistics - 20

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 19

Ordinary Least Squares - 19

Standard Industrial Classification - 16

Journal of Labor Economics - 15

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

Longitudinal Business Database - 14

MIT Press - 14

Longitudinal Research Database - 14

Review of Economic Studies - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 13

Census of Manufactures - 13

Journal of Econometrics - 11

Cambridge University Press - 11

Total Factor Productivity - 11

Journal of International Economics - 11

Princeton University Press - 10

Harvard University - 10

Employer Identification Numbers - 10

Current Population Survey - 10

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 9

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 9

Internal Revenue Service - 8

World Bank - 8

Journal of Human Resources - 8

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 7

Social Security Administration - 7

Unemployment Insurance - 7

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 7

Cobb-Douglas - 7

Federal Reserve Bank - 6

Columbia University - 6

Decennial Census - 6

Special Sworn Status - 6

Cornell University - 6

Business Register - 6

Research Data Center - 6

Social Security Number - 6

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 6

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 6

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

University of Maryland - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Service Annual Survey - 5

Social Security - 5

American Community Survey - 5

Protected Identification Key - 5

Business Employment Dynamics - 5

Local Employment Dynamics - 5

Office of Personnel Management - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 4

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Business Dynamics Statistics - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Employment History File - 4

Employer Characteristics File - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

LEHD Program - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Brookings Institution - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

United States Census Bureau - 4

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 3

Board of Governors - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Technical Services - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Department of Homeland Security - 3

Department of Defense - 3

Business Master File - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

American Housing Survey - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Master Address File - 3

Business Register Bridge - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

Economic Census - 3

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 3

Department of Agriculture - 3

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 3

Stanford University - 3

New York Times - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

2010 Census - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

econometric - 27

production - 16

workforce - 15

macroeconomic - 14

manufacturing - 14

economist - 14

labor - 13

employ - 12

employee - 11

employed - 9

export - 8

industrial - 8

hiring - 7

payroll - 7

worker - 7

market - 7

demand - 7

growth - 7

earnings - 6

innovation - 6

sale - 6

workplace - 6

salary - 6

revenue - 6

expenditure - 6

factory - 6

organizational - 5

discrimination - 5

recession - 5

occupation - 5

census employment - 5

manufacturer - 5

profit - 5

tariff - 5

entrepreneurship - 4

competitor - 4

survey - 4

agency - 4

employment data - 4

employment dynamics - 4

employment statistics - 4

employer household - 4

profitability - 4

enterprise - 4

spillover - 4

import - 4

exporter - 4

company - 4

establishment - 4

externality - 4

efficiency - 4

diversification - 4

textile - 4

patent - 4

entrepreneurial - 3

venture - 3

entrepreneur - 3

startup firms - 3

startups employees - 3

managerial - 3

management - 3

hire - 3

clerical - 3

census bureau - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

employee data - 3

corporate - 3

specialization - 3

competitiveness - 3

regulation - 3

estimation - 3

quarterly - 3

enrollment - 3

schooling - 3

gdp - 3

firms export - 3

importer - 3

exporting firms - 3

report - 3

exporting - 3

subsidy - 3

insurance - 3

wages productivity - 3

product - 3

sector - 3

midwest - 3

regional - 3

sectoral - 3

regional economic - 3

region - 3

industrialized - 3

regional industry - 3

regional industries - 3

estimating - 3

employment growth - 3

labor statistics - 3

monopolistic - 3

quantity - 3

produce - 3

plants industries - 3

econometrician - 3

plant productivity - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 49


  • Working Paper

    Import Price Pressure on Firm Productivity and Employment: The Case of U.S. Textiles

    March 2006

    Authors: Patrick Conway

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-09

    Theoretical research has predicted three different effects of increased import competition on plant-level behavior: reduced domestic production and sales, improving average efficiency of plants, and increased exit of marginal firms. In empirical work, though, such effects are difficult to separate from the impact of exogenous technological progress (or regress). I use detailed plant-level information available in the US Census of Manufacturers and the Annual Survey of Manufacturers for the period 1983-2000 to decompose these effects. I derive the relative contribution of technology and import competition to the increase in productivity and the decline in employment in textiles production in the US in recent years. I then simulate the impact of removal of quota protection on the scale of operation of the average plant and the incentive to plant closure. The methodology employs a number of important innovations in examining the impact of falling import prices on the domestic production of an import-competing good. First, import competition is modeled directly through its impact on the relative prices of monopolistically competitive goods along the lines suggested by Melitz (2000). Second, the effect of technology is incorporated through structural estimation of plant-level production functions in four factors (capital, labor, energy and materials). Solutions to econometric difficulties related to missing capital data and unobserved productivity are incorporated into the estimation technique. The model is estimated for plants with primary product in SIC 2211 (broadwoven cotton cloth). Results validate modeling demand as for differentiated products. Technological coefficients are sensible, with exogenous technological progress playing a large role. In the simulations run, the effects of foreign price competition are orders of magnitude higher than those of technological progress for the period after quotas on imports are removed. The large-scale reduction in employment and output in the US is shown to be a combination of reduced employment and output at plants in continuous operation and of plant closures that exceed new entries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is There Really an Export Wage Premium? A Case Study of Los Angeles Using Matched Employee-Employer Data

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-06

    This paper investigates the effects of exporting on wages, specifically the claim that workers are paid higher wages if they are employed in manufacturing plants that export vis-'-vis plants that do not export. Past research on US plants has supported the existence of an export wage premium, though European studies dispute those results calling for more care in econometric investigation to control for worker characteristics. We answer this call developing a matched employee-employer data set linking worker characteristics from the one-in-six long form of the Decennial Household Census to manufacturing establishment data from the Longitudinal Research Database. Analysis focuses on 1990 and 2000 data for the Los Angeles Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area. Our results confirm that the average wage in manufacturing plants that export is greater than that in manufacturing plants that do not export. However, after controlling for worker characteristics such as age, gender, education, race and nationality, the export wage premium vanishes. That is, when comparing workers with similar characteristics, there is no wage difference between exporting and non-exporting plants. These results concord with recent findings from Europe and elsewhere.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Work Disincentive Effects of the Disability Insurance Program in the 1990s

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-05

    In this paper we evaluate the work disincentive effects of the Disability Insurance program during the 1990s. To accomplish this we construct a new large data set with detailed information on DI application and award decisions and use two different econometric evaluation methods. First, we apply a comparison group approach proposed by John Bound to estimate an upper bound for the work disincentive effect of the current DI program. Second, we adopt a Regression-Discontinuity approach that exploits a particular feature of the DI eligibility determination process to provide a credible point estimate of the impact of the DI program on labor supply for an important subset of DI applicants. Our estimates indicate that during the 1990s the labor force participation rate of DI beneficiaries would have been at most 20 percentage points higher had none received benefits. In addition, we find even smaller labor supply responses for the subset of 'marginal' applicants whose disability determination is based on vocational factors.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Confidentiality Protection in the Census Bureau Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-02

    The QuarterlyWorkforce Indicators are new estimates developed by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. These data provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment, accessions, layoffs, hires, separations, full-quarter employment (and related flows), job creations, job destructions, and earnings (for flow and stock categories of workers). The data are released for NAICS industries (and 4-digit SICs) at the county, workforce investment board, and metropolitan area levels of geography. The confidential microdata - unemployment insurance wage records, ES-202 establishment employment, and Title 13 demographic and economic information - are protected using a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor. This factor distorts all input sums, counts, differences and ratios. The released statistics are analytically valid - measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. The confidentiality protection is manifested in the release of some statistics that are flagged as "significantly distorted to preserve confidentiality." These statistics differ from the undistorted statistics by a significant proportion. Even for the significantly distorted statistics, the data remain analytically valid for time series properties. The released data can be aggregated; however, published aggregates are less distorted than custom postrelease aggregates. In addition to the multiplicative noise distortion, confidentiality protection is provided by the estimation process for the QWIs, which multiply imputes all missing data (including missing establishment, given UI account, in the UI wage record data) and dynamically re-weights the establishment data to provide state-level comparability with the BLS's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Effect of Volatility Change on Product Diversification

    October 2005

    Authors: Namsuk Kim

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-05-14

    Studies of the volatility of the U.S. economy suggest a noticeable change in mid 1980s. There is some empirical evidence that the aggregate volatility of the U.S. economy has been decreasing over time. The response of firms to the change of economic volatility and economic fluctuation has been studied in terms of many margins a firm can adjust 'capital, labor, capacity, material, etc. However, we have not studied the most important margin ' the product. This paper studies the effect of profit volatility on the firm/plant level product diversification. Section 2 profiles diversification and shows that there is a downward trend of aggregate diversification in many industries. Cyclicality of diversification is not clear at the aggregate or industry level. Firms change their diversification very frequently and very differently from one another. Section 3 verifies the trend of volatility at the aggregate, sectoral, and firm level and studies the relationship between diversification and volatility at the firm level. Firm level diversification decreases as the aggregate, sectoral and idiosyncratic volatility decreases.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Factor Substitution In U.S. Manufacturing: Does Plant Size Matter

    April 1998

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-06

    We use micro data for 10,412 U.S. manufacturing plants to estimate the degrees of factor substitution by industry and by plant size. We find that (1) capital, labor, energy and materials are substitutes in production, and (2) the degrees of substitution among inputs are quite similar across plant sizes in a majority of industries. Two important implications of these findings are that (1) small plants are typically as flexible as large plants in factor substitution; consequently, economic policies such energy conservation policies that result in rising energy prices would not cause negative effects on either large or small U.S. manufacturing plants; and (2) since energy and capital are found to be substitutes; the 1973 energy crisis is unlikely to be a significant factor contributing to the post 1973 productivity slowdown. of Substitution
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Industrial Spillovers in Developing Countries: Plant-level Evidence From Chile, Mexico, and Morocco

    January 1998

    Authors: C.J. Krizan

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-98-01

    This paper documents the procedure used to match firm-level data from the Quarterly Financial Reports (QFR) to plant-level (establishment) data from the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD). The resulting matched firms and their plants provide a link between a firm's financial structure and its manufacturing plants. The linked database provides a resource that researchers can use to examine the interaction of financial structure with firm decisions - including decisions such as employment, investment, mergers, and asset redeployment. Financial structure characteristics in the QFR include the composition and amount of debt claims.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Productivity Adjustments and Learning-by-Doing as Human Capital

    November 1997

    Authors: Jim Bessen

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-17

    This paper measures plant-level productivity gains associated with learning curves across the entire manufacturing sector. We measure these gains at plant startups and also after major employment changes. We find: 1.) The gains are strongly associated with a variety of human capital measures implying that learning-by-doing is largely a firm-specific human capital investment. 2.) This implicit investment is large; many plants invest as much in learning-by-doing as they invest in physical capital and much more than they invest in formal job training. 3.) This investment differs persistently over industries and is higher with greater R&D. 4.) Consistent with a learning-by-doing interpretation, the human capital investment is much larger following employment decreases than increases. We conclude that learning-by-doing is a major factor in wage determination, technical progress and asymmetric employment adjustment costs.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Applied General Equilibrium Model Of Moroccan Trade Liberalization Featuring External Economies

    November 1997

    Authors: C.J. Krizan

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-97-16

    Since the 1920's economists have wrestled with the effects of external economies on trade liberalization. In this paper I show that under extreme conditions, externalities can reverse the gains from trade found in perfectly competitive trade models. However, the externalities needed to generate this result, even under the worst possible conditions (all expanding industries are subject to negative externalities, all contracting industries have positive externalities) are orders of magnitude larger than those estimated in Krizan (1997). This suggests that the presence of external economies of scale does not provide a credible argument for protectionism. On the other hand, the CGE model showed that external effects can increase the welfare gains from trade liberalization, but the combined effect is still small compared to other policy options. This finding contrasts sharply with many models featuring internal returns to scale that are able to generate large welfare benefits from trade liberalization.
    View Full Paper PDF