CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Person Validation System'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Protected Identification Key - 76

Internal Revenue Service - 54

Social Security Number - 53

American Community Survey - 52

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 47

Social Security Administration - 47

Person Identification Validation System - 44

Current Population Survey - 41

Social Security - 37

Personally Identifiable Information - 26

2010 Census - 24

Decennial Census - 23

W-2 - 21

Disclosure Review Board - 21

Master Address File - 20

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 20

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 19

Census Numident - 19

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 18

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 18

Housing and Urban Development - 17

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 16

Office of Management and Budget - 15

Some Other Race - 14

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 14

Employer Identification Numbers - 14

Social and Economic Supplement - 13

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 13

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 13

National Bureau of Economic Research - 12

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 12

Medicaid Services - 12

Census Household Composition Key - 12

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 11

Administrative Records - 11

Indian Health Service - 11

SSA Numident - 11

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 11

Earned Income Tax Credit - 10

Center for Economic Studies - 10

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 10

North American Industry Classification System - 10

1940 Census - 10

Ordinary Least Squares - 10

Adjusted Gross Income - 9

MAFID - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Service Annual Survey - 9

Business Register - 9

Centers for Medicare - 9

Indian Housing Information Center - 9

Census Edited File - 9

National Science Foundation - 9

National Opinion Research Center - 9

ASEC - 8

Population Estimates Program - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Disability Insurance - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Detailed Earnings Records - 8

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

PIKed - 7

Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Center for Administrative Records Research - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Data Management System - 7

DOB - 7

American Housing Survey - 6

CPS ASEC - 6

Federal Poverty Level - 6

COVID-19 - 6

Department of Homeland Security - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Selective Service System - 6

National Institute on Aging - 6

University of Chicago - 6

Census 2000 - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 5

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 5

Census Bureau Business Register - 5

New York University - 5

Journal of Economic Literature - 5

PSID - 5

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 5

Postal Service - 5

Department of Agriculture - 4

Food and Nutrition Service - 4

Unemployment Insurance - 4

Employment History File - 4

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 4

County Business Patterns - 4

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 4

Master Earnings File - 4

Cornell University - 4

Research Data Center - 4

Department of Labor - 4

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 4

Form W-2 - 4

Federal Register - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Department of Education - 3

Individual Characteristics File - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

COVID - 3

Federal Reserve Bank - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Harvard University - 3

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 3

Department of Justice - 3

Office of Personnel Management - 3

HHS - 3

Stanford University - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

population - 33

survey - 32

respondent - 29

census bureau - 25

census data - 21

ethnicity - 18

socioeconomic - 17

irs - 17

record - 16

data - 16

disadvantaged - 16

hispanic - 16

data census - 15

minority - 15

1040 - 14

poverty - 14

family - 13

tax - 13

medicaid - 13

enrollment - 13

immigrant - 13

taxpayer - 12

records census - 12

resident - 12

census responses - 12

race - 12

ethnic - 12

federal - 11

use census - 11

assessed - 11

earnings - 11

matching - 11

datasets - 11

recession - 11

citizen - 11

intergenerational - 10

eligibility - 10

agency - 10

disparity - 10

racial - 10

employed - 10

statistical - 9

welfare - 9

imputation - 9

sampling - 9

ssa - 9

labor - 9

workforce - 9

residence - 8

income data - 8

estimating - 8

coverage - 8

census records - 8

census survey - 8

database - 8

employ - 8

income households - 7

filing - 7

eligible - 7

census use - 7

earner - 7

identifier - 7

parent - 7

immigration - 7

unemployed - 7

survey income - 7

percentile - 7

race census - 7

housing - 6

estimates census - 6

2010 census - 6

enrolled - 6

linkage - 6

dependent - 6

microdata - 6

native - 6

black - 6

residential - 5

child - 5

provided census - 5

census research - 5

bias - 5

household surveys - 5

economist - 5

department - 5

residing - 5

survey households - 5

migration - 5

surveys censuses - 5

medicare - 5

citizenship - 5

payroll - 5

heterogeneity - 5

white - 5

associate - 5

latino - 5

census file - 5

state - 4

renter - 4

prevalence - 4

census estimates - 4

sample census - 4

enrollee - 4

employee - 4

parental - 4

population survey - 4

census linked - 4

income survey - 4

exemption - 4

census household - 4

migrant - 4

retirement - 4

poor - 4

birth - 4

assessing - 4

mexican - 4

segregation - 4

salary - 4

occupation - 4

ancestry - 4

matched - 4

rent - 3

report - 3

available census - 3

censuses surveys - 3

researcher - 3

statistician - 3

census employment - 3

individuals census - 3

disclosure - 3

graduate - 3

career - 3

postsecondary - 3

subsidy - 3

income individuals - 3

household income - 3

taxable - 3

linked census - 3

impact - 3

environmental - 3

pandemic - 3

propensity - 3

expenditure - 3

adoption - 3

mobility - 3

insurance - 3

wealth - 3

reside - 3

recessionary - 3

parents income - 3

schooling - 3

recession exposure - 3

maternal - 3

estimator - 3

census 2020 - 3

patent - 3

patenting - 3

mortality - 3

worker demographics - 3

employee data - 3

econometric - 3

hiring - 3

industrial - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 82


  • Working Paper

    The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-63

    Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Producing U.S. Population Statistics Using Multiple Administrative Sources

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-58

    We identify several challenges encountered when constructing U.S. administrative record-based (AR-based) population estimates for 2020. Though the AR estimates are higher than the 2020 Census at the national level, they are over 15 percent lower in 5 percent of counties, suggesting that locational accuracy can be improved. Other challenges include how to achieve comprehensive coverage, maintain consistent coverage across time, filter out nonresidents and people not alive on the reference date, uncover missing links across person and address records, and predict demographic characteristics when multiple ones are reported or when they are missing. We discuss several ways of addressing these issues, e.g., building in redundancy with more sources, linking children to their parents' addresses, and conducting additional record linkage for people without Social Security Numbers and for addresses not initially linked to the Census Bureau's Master Address File. We discuss modeling to predict lower levels of geography for people lacking those geocodes, the probability that a person is a U.S. resident on the reference date, the probability that an address is the person's residence on the reference date, and the probability a person is in each demographic characteristic category. Regression results illustrate how many of these challenges and solutions affect the AR county population estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Tale of Two Fields? STEM Career Outcomes

    October 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-53

    Is the labor market for US researchers experiencing the best or worst of times? This paper analyzes the market for recently minted Ph.D. recipients using supply-and-demand logic and data linking graduate students to their dissertations and W2 tax records. We also construct a new dissertation-industry 'relevance' measure, comparing dissertation and patent text and linking patents to assignee firms and industries. We find large disparities across research fields in placement (faculty, postdoc, and industry positions), earnings, and the use of specialized human capital. Thus, it appears to simultaneously be a good time for some fields and a bad time for others.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Coverage of Children in the American Community Survey Based on California Birth Records

    September 2023

    Authors: Gloria G. Aldana

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-46

    The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) collects information on individuals and households. The ACS provides survey-based estimates of children drawn from a sample of the U.S. population. However, survey responses may not match administrative records, such as birth records. Birth records should provide a complete account of all births, along with child-parent relationships and demographic characteristics. California is a state that has both a large population of children and a high undercount for young children. This paper uses California as a case study to examine differences between reported versus unreported children in the ACS based on state birth records. Child reporting rates were lower for more recent data years, younger children, for Black and Hispanic mothers, and for more complex households. Child reporting rates were higher for more educated mothers and for households above the poverty line. Using mother's race and Hispanic ethnicity from the birth records combined with poverty indices from the ACS, this analysis also finds that child reporting does not uniformly vary with poverty status across all race and ethnicity groups. This research builds support for the utility of state birth records in analyzing the undercount of children.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    When and Why Does Nonresponse Occur? Comparing the Determinants of Initial Unit Nonresponse and Panel Attrition

    September 2023

    Authors: Tiffany S. Neman

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-44

    Though unit nonresponse threatens data quality in both cross-sectional and panel surveys, little is understood about how initial nonresponse and later panel attrition may be theoretically or empirically distinct phenomena. This study advances current knowledge of the determinants of both unit nonresponse and panel attrition within the context of the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) panel survey, which I link with high-quality federal administrative records, paradata, and geographic data. By exploiting the SIPP's interpenetrated sampling design and relying on cross-classified random effects modeling, this study quantifies the relative effects of sample household, interviewer, and place characteristics on baseline nonresponse and later attrition, addressing a critical gap in the literature. Given the reliance on successful record linkages between survey sample households and federal administrative data in the nonresponse research, this study also undertakes an explicitly spatial analysis of the place-based characteristics associated with successful record linkages in the U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Eviction and Poverty in American Cities

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-37

    More than two million U.S. households have an eviction case filed against them each year. Policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels are increasingly pursuing policies to reduce the number of evictions, citing harm to tenants and high public expenditures related to homelessness. We study the consequences of eviction for tenants using newly linked administrative data from two major urban areas: Cook County (which includes Chicago) and New York City. We document that prior to housing court, tenants experience declines in earnings and employment and increases in financial distress and hospital visits. These pre-trends pose a challenge for disentangling correlation and causation. To address this problem, we use an instrumental variables approach based on cases randomly assigned to judges of varying leniency. We find that an eviction order increases homelessness and hospital visits and reduces earnings, durable goods consumption, and access to credit in the first two years. Effects on housing and labor market outcomes are driven by impacts for female and Black tenants. In the longer-run, eviction increases indebtedness and reduces credit scores.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Demographics of the Recipients of the First Economic Impact Payment

    May 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-24

    Starting in April 2020, the federal government began to distribute Economic Impact Payments (EIPs) in response to the health and economic crisis caused by COVID-19. More than 160 million payments were disbursed. We produce statistics concerning the receipt of EIPs by individuals and households across key demographic subgroups. We find that payments went out particularly quickly to households with children and lower-income households, and the rate of receipt was quite high for individuals over age 60, likely due to a coordinated effort to issue payments automatically to Social Security recipients. We disaggregate statistics by race/ethnicity to document whether racial disparities arose in EIP disbursement. Receipt rates were high overall, with limited differences across racial/ethnic subgroups. We provide a set of detailed counts in tables for use by the public.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the U.S. Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) Using Blended Survey Data, Administrative Record Data, and Modeling: Technical Report

    April 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-21

    This report develops a method using administrative records (AR) to fill in responses for nonresponding American Community Survey (ACS) housing units rather than adjusting survey weights to account for selection of a subset of nonresponding housing units for follow-up interviews and for nonresponse bias. The method also inserts AR and modeling in place of edits and imputations for ACS survey citizenship item nonresponses. We produce Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) tabulations using this enhanced CVAP method and compare them to published estimates. The enhanced CVAP method produces a 0.74 percentage point lower citizen share, and it is 3.05 percentage points lower for voting-age Hispanics. The latter result can be partly explained by omissions of voting-age Hispanic noncitizens with unknown legal status from ACS household responses. Weight adjustments may be less effective at addressing nonresponse bias under those conditions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Universal Preschool Lottery Admissions and Its Effects on Long-Run Earnings and Outcomes

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-09

    We use an admissions lottery to estimate the effect of a universal (non-means tested) preschool program on students' long-run earnings, income, marital status, fertility and geographic mobility. We observe long-run outcomes by linking both admitted and non-admitted individuals to confidential administrative data including tax records. Funding for this preschool program comes from an Indigenous organization, which grants Indigenous students admissions preference and free tuition. We find treated children have between 5 to 6 percent higher earnings as young adults. The results are strongest for individuals from the lower half of the household income distribution in childhood. Likely mechanisms include high-quality teachers and curriculum.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Full Report of the Comparisons of Administrative Record Rosters to Census Self-Responses and NRFU Household Member Responses

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-08

    One of the U.S. Census Bureau's innovations in the 2020 U.S. Census was the use of administrative records (AR) to create household rosters for enumerating some addresses when a self response was not available but high-quality ARs were. The goal was to reduce the cost of fieldwork during the Nonresponse Followup operation (NRFU). The original plan had NRFU beginning in mid-May and continuing through late July 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced the delay of NRFU and caused the Internal Revenue Service to postpone the income tax filing deadline, resulting in an interruption in the delivery of ARs to the U.S. Census Bureau. The delays were not anticipated when U.S. Census Bureau staff conducted the research on AR enumeration with the 2010 Census data in preparation for the 2020 Census or during the fine tuning of plans for using ARs during the 2018 End-to-End Census Test. These circumstances raised questions about whether the quality of the AR household rosters was high enough for use in enumeration. To aid in investigating the concern about the quality of the AR rosters, our analyses compared AR rosters to self-response rosters and NRFU household member responses at addresses where both ARs and a self-response were available.
    View Full Paper PDF