CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 138

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 134

Disclosure Review Board - 129

North American Industry Classification System - 125

Internal Revenue Service - 118

Longitudinal Business Database - 117

Protected Identification Key - 90

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 81

Social Security Administration - 78

Current Population Survey - 78

Center for Economic Studies - 71

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 68

National Science Foundation - 65

Social Security Number - 63

Employer Identification Numbers - 60

Ordinary Least Squares - 60

Decennial Census - 59

Social Security - 53

National Bureau of Economic Research - 47

Business Register - 44

W-2 - 43

Person Validation System - 42

Federal Reserve Bank - 38

Economic Census - 37

Business Dynamics Statistics - 34

Census Bureau Business Register - 33

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 33

2010 Census - 33

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 29

Total Factor Productivity - 28

Census Numident - 28

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 27

Standard Industrial Classification - 26

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 26

Federal Reserve System - 25

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 25

Person Identification Validation System - 25

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 24

Adjusted Gross Income - 24

Master Address File - 24

Census of Manufactures - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

County Business Patterns - 22

Personally Identifiable Information - 22

COVID-19 - 22

Department of Homeland Security - 21

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Housing and Urban Development - 21

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 20

Department of Economics - 20

Annual Business Survey - 20

Patent and Trademark Office - 18

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 18

Unemployment Insurance - 18

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 18

Survey of Business Owners - 18

Accommodation and Food Services - 18

Special Sworn Status - 18

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Cobb-Douglas - 17

Technical Services - 16

National Center for Health Statistics - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 16

Earned Income Tax Credit - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Data Management System - 16

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 15

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Cornell University - 15

University of Maryland - 15

PSID - 15

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 15

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 14

Department of Labor - 14

1940 Census - 14

International Trade Research Report - 14

Census Household Composition Key - 14

Board of Governors - 13

National Institutes of Health - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

National Institute on Aging - 13

Indian Health Service - 13

Environmental Protection Agency - 12

University of Chicago - 12

Department of Education - 12

Retail Trade - 12

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 12

General Accounting Office - 12

ASEC - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

American Economic Association - 12

SSA Numident - 11

Arts, Entertainment - 11

Census Edited File - 11

Some Other Race - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 11

Postal Service - 11

World Trade Organization - 10

Supreme Court - 10

Wholesale Trade - 10

Securities and Exchange Commission - 10

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 10

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 10

Harmonized System - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

AKM - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Disability Insurance - 10

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 10

New York University - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

Department of Agriculture - 9

European Union - 9

Energy Information Administration - 9

IQR - 9

Stanford University - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

National Employer Survey - 9

United States Census Bureau - 9

MAFID - 9

American Housing Survey - 9

University of Michigan - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

UC Berkeley - 8

Census Bureau Master Address File - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Educational Services - 8

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

COVID - 8

Russell Sage Foundation - 8

Customs and Border Protection - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Health Care and Social Assistance - 8

Sloan Foundation - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Pew Research Center - 8

Business Formation Statistics - 8

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Department of Energy - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Oil and Gas Extraction - 7

Initial Public Offering - 7

Company Organization Survey - 7

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Occupational Employment Statistics - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Federal Register - 7

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 7

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 7

Professional Services - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

Employment History File - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Department of Justice - 7

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 6

National Academy of Sciences - 6

Survey of Consumer Finances - 6

Public Administration - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Research and Development - 6

Legal Form of Organization - 6

Yale University - 6

CPS ASEC - 6

IBM - 6

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Urban Institute - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Retirement History Survey - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Agriculture, Forestry - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

Harvard University - 5

Boston College - 5

Administrative Records - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

PIKed - 5

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 5

George Mason University - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

LEHD Program - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

National Research Council - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

North American Free Trade Agreement - 4

Columbia University - 4

United Nations - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

University of Toronto - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

IZA - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Net Present Value - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Limited Liability Company - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Princeton University - 4

2SLS - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPR - 4

European Commission - 4

World Bank - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

University of California - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 3

Census of Services - 3

University of Texas - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Penn State University - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

CDF - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Business Services - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Meyer et al - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

TFPQ - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Georgetown University - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Foreign Direct Investment - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Guzman and Stern - 3

John Voorheis - 22

Lucia Foster - 20

John Haltiwanger - 17

John M. Abowd - 14

Nathan Goldschlag - 12

Emin Dinlersoz - 11

J. David Brown - 11

Fariha Kamal - 10

Jonathan Eggleston - 10

Sonya R. Porter - 10

Catherine Buffington - 9

Moises Yi - 9

Lars Vilhuber - 8

Maggie R. Jones - 8

Kevin Rinz - 8

Leah R. Clark - 7

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 7

Zachary Kroff - 7

Cheryl Grim - 6

Zoltan Wolf - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Martha Stinson - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Jonathan Colmer - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Kevin L. McKinney - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Joseph Staudt - 5

Ariel J. Binder - 5

Nikolas Zolas - 5

Thomas B. Foster - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Kendall Houghton - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Emek Basker - 4

G. Jacob Blackwood - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Ryan Monarch - 4

Nicholas Bloom - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Erik Brynjolfsson - 4

Teresa C. Fort - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Charles Hokayem - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Amanda Eng - 4

Reed Walker - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 4

Leticia Fernandez - 4

Danielle H. Sandler - 4

Andrew Penner - 3

Michelle Spiegel - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Kristin Sandusky - 3

Ethan Lewis - 3

Robert Ashmead - 3

Daniel Kifer - 3

Philip Leclerc - 3

Rolando A. Rodríguez - 3

Tamara Adams - 3

David Darais - 3

Sourya Dey - 3

Simson L. Garfinkel - 3

Scott Moore - 3

Ramy N. Tadros - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Steven J. Davis - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Peter Schott - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Richard Mansfield - 3

Ethan Krohn - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Adela Luque - 3

Carl Lieberman - 3

Garrett Anstreicher - 3

Gale Boyd - 3

Matthew Doolin - 3

James M. Noon - 3

James P. Ziliak - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

Sharon R. Ennis - 3

Matthew Staiger - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Sarah Miller - 3

Laura Wherry - 3

Javier Miranda - 3

Shawn Klimek - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

earnings - 61

employed - 60

employ - 58

labor - 58

population - 57

workforce - 56

survey - 53

recession - 49

respondent - 44

ethnicity - 42

market - 35

hispanic - 35

disparity - 34

innovation - 33

manufacturing - 33

employee - 33

revenue - 32

minority - 32

immigrant - 32

economist - 31

disadvantaged - 31

census bureau - 30

sector - 30

payroll - 30

growth - 28

investment - 28

entrepreneur - 28

poverty - 27

earner - 27

industrial - 26

economically - 26

socioeconomic - 26

ethnic - 26

entrepreneurship - 26

estimating - 26

company - 26

disclosure - 26

resident - 26

statistical - 25

racial - 25

macroeconomic - 24

export - 24

irs - 24

salary - 24

expenditure - 24

immigration - 24

patent - 23

gdp - 23

census data - 23

enterprise - 23

race - 23

sale - 22

production - 22

tax - 22

hiring - 21

neighborhood - 21

econometric - 21

venture - 20

trend - 20

residence - 20

agency - 20

worker - 19

demand - 19

housing - 19

spillover - 19

welfare - 19

import - 18

financial - 18

percentile - 18

data census - 18

finance - 18

heterogeneity - 18

unemployed - 18

data - 18

1040 - 17

report - 17

enrollment - 17

migrant - 17

quarterly - 16

intergenerational - 16

entrepreneurial - 16

segregation - 16

rent - 16

incentive - 16

endogeneity - 16

technological - 15

inventory - 15

patenting - 15

occupation - 15

relocation - 15

loan - 15

use census - 15

eligibility - 15

corporation - 15

family - 15

citizen - 15

exporter - 14

impact - 14

state - 14

residential - 14

job - 13

earn - 13

record - 13

investor - 13

discrimination - 13

microdata - 13

taxpayer - 13

wealth - 12

graduate - 12

proprietor - 12

rural - 12

funding - 12

hire - 12

establishment - 12

datasets - 12

federal - 12

innovate - 11

migration - 11

aggregate - 11

imputation - 11

census responses - 11

importer - 11

estimation - 11

manufacturer - 11

black - 11

researcher - 11

medicaid - 11

bias - 11

trading - 10

monopolistic - 10

acquisition - 10

prevalence - 10

enrolled - 10

retirement - 10

incorporated - 10

census employment - 10

parent - 10

employment growth - 10

white - 10

shipment - 9

innovative - 9

invention - 9

innovating - 9

bank - 9

debt - 9

eligible - 9

census disclosure - 9

income data - 9

productivity growth - 9

efficiency - 9

parental - 9

child - 9

coverage - 9

proprietorship - 9

assessed - 9

home - 9

renter - 9

community - 9

pandemic - 9

metropolitan - 9

lender - 9

employment earnings - 9

financing - 9

household surveys - 9

organizational - 9

native - 9

urban - 9

migrate - 9

profit - 9

geographically - 9

filing - 9

environmental - 9

emission - 9

census household - 9

mexican - 9

exporting - 8

exogeneity - 8

relocate - 8

adoption - 8

commerce - 8

mortgage - 8

ssa - 8

labor markets - 8

poorer - 8

multinational - 8

supplier - 8

imported - 8

borrower - 8

lending - 8

stock - 8

produce - 8

productive - 8

startup - 8

city - 8

migrating - 8

dependent - 8

pollution - 8

technology - 7

regress - 7

accounting - 7

borrowing - 7

equity - 7

fund - 7

analysis - 7

study - 7

mortality - 7

economic census - 7

retailer - 7

wholesale - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

generation - 7

homeowner - 7

insurance - 7

latino - 7

segregated - 7

price - 7

consumption - 7

tariff - 7

investing - 7

invest - 7

census survey - 7

subsidy - 7

employment statistics - 7

mobility - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

banking - 7

confidentiality - 7

woman - 7

saving - 7

regional - 7

competitor - 7

workers earnings - 7

product - 6

exported - 6

shift - 6

unemployment rates - 6

creditor - 6

family income - 6

parents income - 6

sampling - 6

university - 6

opportunity - 6

associate - 6

institutional - 6

productivity measures - 6

warehousing - 6

database - 6

labor statistics - 6

maternal - 6

asian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

founder - 6

credit - 6

importing - 6

earnings employees - 6

2010 census - 6

prospect - 6

security - 6

growth productivity - 6

innovator - 6

employment estimates - 6

employment data - 6

workplace - 6

employment trends - 6

leverage - 6

provided census - 6

epa - 6

pollution exposure - 6

sectoral - 6

monopolistically - 6

pollutant - 6

policymakers - 6

birth - 6

research - 6

custom - 5

trader - 5

merger - 5

specialization - 5

patented - 5

layoff - 5

borrow - 5

disability - 5

income white - 5

average - 5

wage gap - 5

educated - 5

measures productivity - 5

aggregate productivity - 5

spending - 5

subsidiary - 5

retail - 5

merchandise - 5

degree - 5

nonemployer businesses - 5

decade - 5

education - 5

house - 5

indian - 5

benefit - 5

applicant - 5

suburb - 5

international trade - 5

foreign - 5

firms export - 5

multinational firms - 5

commodity - 5

risk - 5

sociology - 5

effects employment - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity shocks - 5

factory - 5

business startups - 5

region - 5

unobserved - 5

longitudinal - 5

census records - 5

survey households - 5

population survey - 5

geographic - 5

wage growth - 5

household income - 5

income households - 5

income children - 5

immigrant workers - 5

globalization - 5

public - 5

concentration - 5

exposure - 5

ownership - 5

linked census - 5

outsourced - 5

surveys censuses - 5

research census - 5

employing - 5

gender - 5

medicare - 5

externality - 5

industry concentration - 5

regressing - 5

estimator - 5

industry productivity - 5

regulation - 5

assimilation - 5

classified - 5

census research - 5

reporting - 5

statistician - 5

regulatory - 4

crime - 4

tech - 4

advancement - 4

innovation patenting - 4

fuel - 4

asset - 4

paper census - 4

assessing - 4

college - 4

earnings gap - 4

information census - 4

fiscal - 4

customer - 4

executive - 4

corporate - 4

grocery - 4

sector productivity - 4

residing - 4

career - 4

postsecondary - 4

schooling - 4

adulthood - 4

death - 4

country - 4

recessionary - 4

agriculture - 4

health - 4

residential segregation - 4

suburbanization - 4

technology adoption - 4

good - 4

consumer - 4

purchase - 4

downstream - 4

sourcing - 4

disaster - 4

hurricane - 4

town - 4

effect wages - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms patents - 4

patents firms - 4

factor productivity - 4

depreciation - 4

area - 4

developed - 4

employment dynamics - 4

worker demographics - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

employment distribution - 4

moving - 4

shareholder - 4

bankruptcy - 4

income individuals - 4

immigrated - 4

privacy - 4

publicly - 4

industry wages - 4

endogenous - 4

census linked - 4

labor productivity - 4

survey income - 4

tenure - 4

electricity - 4

energy - 4

earnings age - 4

employment wages - 4

taxation - 4

matching - 4

recession exposure - 4

subsidized - 4

cost - 4

indicator - 4

policy - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

renewable - 4

union - 4

fertility - 4

earnings workers - 4

employment measures - 4

censuses surveys - 4

earnings mobility - 4

pension - 3

estimates intergenerational - 3

grandparent - 3

budget - 3

rate - 3

sample - 3

earns - 3

consolidated - 3

department - 3

identifier - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

warehouse - 3

productivity distribution - 3

productivity variation - 3

mother - 3

preschool - 3

cohort - 3

outcome - 3

midwest - 3

urbanized - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

export market - 3

affluent - 3

wage earnings - 3

firm patenting - 3

productivity dynamics - 3

wage effects - 3

patenting firms - 3

work census - 3

turnover - 3

collateral - 3

aging - 3

younger firms - 3

wages employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms young - 3

autoregressive - 3

growth employment - 3

shock - 3

information - 3

relocating - 3

firms import - 3

expense - 3

taxable - 3

restaurant - 3

apartment - 3

location - 3

outsourcing - 3

exogenous - 3

entry productivity - 3

employment increases - 3

income survey - 3

neighbor - 3

records census - 3

race census - 3

larger firms - 3

interracial - 3

employment effects - 3

impact employment - 3

earnings growth - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

volatility - 3

ancestry - 3

firms grow - 3

poor - 3

industry variation - 3

network - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

geography - 3

oligopolistic - 3

utility - 3

enforcement - 3

locality - 3

wage data - 3

polluting - 3

econometrician - 3

earnings inequality - 3

pregnancy - 3

mandate - 3

individuals census - 3

business data - 3

employer household - 3

employment count - 3

measures employment - 3

workforce indicators - 3

employed census - 3

statistical agencies - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 306


  • Working Paper

    Investments under Risk: Evidence from Hurricane Strikes

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-43

    We demonstrate that firms with plants in areas subject to a significant hurricane strike reduce their capital expenditures at the hurricane-affected plants and shift capital expenditures to plants in non-hurricane-affected areas. This effect is not present prior to 1997 and only appears from 1997 on. Our evidence is consistent with the possibility that a significant climate event such as the signing of the Kyoto Protocol raised the salience of the perceived risk from actual hurricane strikes and shifted firm behavior.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Rural/Urban Volunteering Divide

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-42

    Are rural residents more likely to volunteer than those living in urban places? Although early sociological theory posited that rural residents were more likely to experience social bonds connecting them to their community, increasing their odds of volunteer engagement, empirical support is limited. Drawing upon the full population of rural and urban respondents to the United States Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015), we found that rural respondents are more likely to report volunteering compared to urban respondents, although these differences are decreasing over time. Moreover, we found that propensities for rural and urban volunteerism vary based on differences in both individual and place-based characteristics; further, the size of these effects differ across rural and urban places. These findings have important implications for theory and empirical analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Decline of Volunteering in the United States: Is it the Economy?

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-41

    This article investigates the complex interactions between local and national economic contexts and volunteering behavior. We examine three dimensions of local economic context'economic disadvantage (e.g., the percentage of families living in poverty), income inequality, and economic growth (e.g., the change in median household income) and the impact of a national/global economic jolt'the Great Recession. Analysis of data from the Current Population Survey's (CPS) Volunteering Supplement (2002-2015) reveals. Individuals who live in places characterized by economic disadvantage and economic inequality are less likely to volunteer than individuals in more advantaged, equitable communities. The recession had a dampening effect on volunteering overall, but it had the largest dampening effect on individual volunteering in communities with above average rates of income equality and higher rates of economic growth. While individuals living in rural communities were more likely to volunteer than their urban counterparts before the recession, rural/urban differences disappear after the recession.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Understanding Criminal Record Penalties in the Labor Market

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-39

    This paper studies the earnings and employment penalties associated with a criminal record. Using a large-scale dataset linking criminal justice and employer-employee wage records, we estimate two-way fixed effects models that decompose earnings into worker's portable earnings potential and firm pay premia, both of which are allowed to shift after a worker acquires a record. We find that firm pay premia explain a small share of earnings gaps between workers with and without a record. There is little evidence of variable within-firm premia gaps either. Instead, components of workers' earnings potential that persist across firms explain the bulk of gaps. Conditional on earnings potential, workers with a record are also substantially less likely to be employed. Difference-in-differences estimates comparing workers' first conviction to workers charged but not convicted or charged later support these findings. The results suggest that criminal record penalties operate primarily by changing whether workers are employed and their earnings potential at every firm rather than increasing sorting into lower-paying jobs, although the bulk of gaps can be attributed to differences that existed prior to acquiring a record.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamics of High-Growth Young Firms and the Role of Venture Capitalists

    June 2025

    Authors: Yoshiki Ando

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-38

    Motivated by the substantial growth and upfront investments of venture capital (VC) backed firms observed in administrative US Census data, this paper develops a firm dynamics model over the life cycle. In the model, startups choose the source of financing from VC, Angel investors, or banks, depending on their growth potential, and invest in innovation. The calibrated model explains the life-cycle dynamics of firms with different sources of financing and implies that venture capitalists' advice accounts for around 22% of the growth of VC-backed firms. A counterfactual economy without VC financing would lose aggregate consumption by around 0.4%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

    June 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-36

    Timely business-level measures of work from home (WFH) are scarce for the U.S. economy. We review prior survey-based efforts to quantify the incidence and character of WFH and describe new questions that we developed and fielded for the Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS). Drawing on more than 150,000 firm-level responses to the BTOS, we obtain four main findings. First, nearly a third of businesses have employees who work from home, with tremendous variation across sectors. The share of businesses with WFH employees is nearly ten times larger in the Information sector than in Accommodation and Food Services. Second, employees work from home about 1 day per week, on average, and businesses expect similar WFH levels in five years. Third, feasibility aside, businesses' largest concern with WFH relates to productivity. Seven percent of businesses find that onsite work is more productive, while two percent find that WFH is more productive. Fourth, there is a low level of tracking and monitoring of WFH activities, with 70% of firms reporting they do not track employee days in the office and 75% reporting they do not monitor employees when they work from home. These lessons serve as a starting point for enhancing WFH-related content in the American Community Survey and other household surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Effects of Eviction on Children

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-34

    Eviction may be an important channel for the intergenerational transmission of poverty, and concerns about its effects on children are often raised as a rationale for tenant protection policies. We study how eviction impacts children's home environment, school engagement, educational achievement, and high school completion by assembling new data sets linking eviction court records in Chicago and New York to administrative public school records and restricted Census records. To disentangle the consequences of eviction from the effects of correlated sources of economic distress, we use a research design based on the random assignment of court cases to judges who vary in their leniency. We find that eviction increases children's residential mobility, homelessness, and likelihood of doubling up with grandparents or other adults. Eviction also disrupts school engagement, causing increased absences and school changes. While we find little impact on elementary and middle school test scores, eviction substantially reduces high school course credits. Lastly, we find that eviction reduces high school graduation and use a novel bounding method to show that this finding is not driven by differential attrition. The disruptive effects of eviction appear worse for older children and boys. Our evidence suggests that the impact of eviction on children runs through the disruption to the home environment or school engagement rather than deterioration in school or neighborhood quality, and may be moderated by access to family support networks.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Firm Heterogeneity, Misallocation, and Trade

    May 2025

    Authors: John Chung

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-33

    To what extent do domestic distortions influence the gains from trade? Using data from Chinese manufacturing surveys and U.S. census records, I document two novel stylized facts: (1) Larger producers in China exhibit lower revenue productivity, whereas larger producers in the U.S. exhibit higher revenue productivity. (2) Larger exporters in China exhibit lower export intensity, whereas larger exporters in the U.S. exhibit higher export intensity. A model of heterogeneous producers shows that only the U.S. patterns are consistent with an efficient allocation. To reconcile the observed patterns in China, I introduce producer- and destination-specific subsidies and estimate the model without imposing functional form assumptions on the joint distribution of productivity and subsidy rates. Accounting for distortions in China leads to substantially smaller estimated gains from trade.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Property Rights, Firm Size and Investments in Innovation: Evidence from the America Invents Act

    May 2025

    Authors: James Driver

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-31

    I analyze whether a change in patent systems differentially affects firm-level innovation investments at patent-valuing firms of different sizes. Using legally required, economically representative, U.S. Census Bureau microdata, I separate firms into groups based on a firm's response to a question asking it to rank the degree of patent importance to its business and firm-size. I then measure how firms' innovation inputs/outputs respond to the America Invents Act (AIA). Results show the AIA reduced innovation investments at smaller, patent-valuing firms while increasing innovation investments at larger, patent-valuing firms, highlighting differential firm-size effects of patent policy and policy's importance to investments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Impact Investing and Worker Outcomes

    May 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-30

    Impact investors claim to distinguish themselves from traditional venture capital and growth equity investors by also pursuing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Whether they successfully do so in practice is unclear. We use confidential Census Bureau microdata to assess worker outcomes across portfolio companies. Impact investors are more likely than other private equity firms to fund businesses in economically disadvantaged areas, and the performance of these companies lags behind those held by traditional private investors. We show that post-funding impact-backed firms are more likely to hire minorities, unskilled workers, and individuals with lower historical earnings, perhaps reflecting the higher representation of minorities in top positions. They also allocate wage increases more favorably to minorities and rank-and-file workers than VC-backed firms. Our results are consistent with impact investors and their portfolio companies acting according to non-pecuniary social goals and thus are not consistent with mere window dressing or cosmetic changes.
    View Full Paper PDF