CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Social Security Number'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Protected Identification Key - 93

Internal Revenue Service - 92

American Community Survey - 88

Social Security Administration - 85

Current Population Survey - 67

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 65

Social Security - 61

Person Validation System - 50

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 42

Disclosure Review Board - 42

Decennial Census - 41

Employer Identification Numbers - 41

W-2 - 38

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 35

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 32

Census Numident - 31

2010 Census - 31

Person Identification Validation System - 30

Master Address File - 29

North American Industry Classification System - 29

Personally Identifiable Information - 27

Center for Economic Studies - 25

National Science Foundation - 25

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 24

Unemployment Insurance - 22

Longitudinal Business Database - 21

Business Register - 21

SSA Numident - 20

Ordinary Least Squares - 20

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 19

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 19

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 17

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 17

Earned Income Tax Credit - 17

Research Data Center - 17

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 16

Cornell University - 16

Service Annual Survey - 16

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 16

Detailed Earnings Records - 15

Medicaid Services - 14

Adjusted Gross Income - 14

Office of Management and Budget - 14

PSID - 14

Administrative Records - 14

Some Other Race - 13

Housing and Urban Development - 13

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

Census Bureau Business Register - 12

Census Household Composition Key - 12

National Bureau of Economic Research - 12

Social and Economic Supplement - 11

Employment History File - 11

Census Bureau Master Address File - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

1940 Census - 11

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 11

Economic Census - 11

National Institute on Aging - 11

PIKed - 10

Federal Reserve Bank - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

Standard Industrial Classification - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

DOB - 10

Centers for Medicare - 9

CPS ASEC - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Department of Labor - 9

Federal Tax Information - 9

County Business Patterns - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Disability Insurance - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Federal Reserve System - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 8

Core Based Statistical Area - 8

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 8

Postal Service - 8

National Opinion Research Center - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Health and Retirement Study - 7

COVID-19 - 7

Cumulative Density Function - 7

Census Edited File - 7

General Accounting Office - 7

Center for Administrative Records Research - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Data Management System - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Indian Housing Information Center - 7

International Trade Research Report - 7

Master Earnings File - 7

Business Employment Dynamics - 7

Census 2000 - 7

MAFID - 6

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

ASEC - 6

Opportunity Atlas - 6

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 6

Social Science Research Institute - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

CDF - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

American Economic Review - 6

MIT Press - 6

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Legal Form of Organization - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

NUMIDENT - 5

Department of Health and Human Services - 5

HHS - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Business Master File - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Department of Education - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Educational Services - 4

Department of Agriculture - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Customs and Border Protection - 4

AKM - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Linear Probability Models - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

Nonemployer Statistics - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Board of Governors - 3

MTO - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

Federal Register - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Yale University - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Special Sworn Status - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Summary Earnings Records - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

survey - 44

population - 39

employed - 38

respondent - 37

ethnicity - 31

census data - 31

hispanic - 30

earnings - 28

census bureau - 25

irs - 25

employ - 25

labor - 25

recession - 24

workforce - 24

immigrant - 23

intergenerational - 21

payroll - 21

disadvantaged - 20

ethnic - 19

socioeconomic - 19

earner - 19

data census - 19

employee - 19

resident - 18

tax - 18

family - 17

minority - 16

estimating - 16

ssa - 16

disparity - 16

data - 16

poverty - 16

1040 - 16

citizen - 16

agency - 15

residence - 15

record - 15

racial - 14

statistical - 13

federal - 13

filing - 13

migration - 13

migrant - 13

taxpayer - 13

immigration - 13

welfare - 13

medicaid - 12

matching - 12

race - 12

entrepreneur - 12

use census - 12

census responses - 12

enrollment - 12

generation - 11

economist - 11

census employment - 11

census survey - 11

unemployed - 11

parent - 10

longitudinal - 10

worker - 10

residential - 10

salary - 10

datasets - 10

statistician - 9

state - 9

coverage - 9

entrepreneurship - 9

percentile - 9

assessed - 9

housing - 9

employment statistics - 9

mobility - 9

census records - 9

revenue - 9

microdata - 9

econometric - 9

quarterly - 9

census use - 9

employee data - 9

records census - 9

white - 8

wealth - 8

proprietor - 8

report - 8

linked census - 8

survey income - 8

segregation - 8

imputation - 8

employer household - 8

earn - 8

census research - 8

census file - 8

mortality - 7

grandparent - 7

linkage - 7

residing - 7

parental - 7

work census - 7

employment data - 7

longitudinal employer - 7

migrate - 7

citizenship - 7

disclosure - 7

dependent - 7

income data - 7

census linked - 7

heterogeneity - 7

labor statistics - 7

database - 7

retirement - 6

enterprise - 6

eligibility - 6

workplace - 6

employment dynamics - 6

migrating - 6

income households - 6

income children - 6

neighborhood - 6

income survey - 6

race census - 6

medicare - 6

census household - 6

macroeconomic - 6

employment earnings - 6

black - 6

workforce indicators - 6

occupation - 6

employment wages - 6

job - 6

identifier - 6

research census - 6

native - 6

enrollee - 6

household surveys - 5

yearly - 5

parents income - 5

department - 5

proprietorship - 5

latino - 5

loan - 5

rent - 5

trend - 5

hiring - 5

reside - 5

enrolled - 5

eligible - 5

child - 5

incentive - 5

poorer - 5

expenditure - 5

impact - 5

environmental - 5

mexican - 5

recessionary - 5

estimation - 5

discrepancy - 5

associate - 5

industrial - 5

employing - 5

clerical - 5

censuses surveys - 5

ancestry - 5

2010 census - 5

matched - 5

wage data - 5

assessing - 5

bias - 4

sampling - 4

individuals census - 4

adoption - 4

estimates intergenerational - 4

graduate - 4

entrepreneurial - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

economic census - 4

asian - 4

insurance - 4

borrower - 4

lending - 4

employment estimates - 4

worker demographics - 4

employment trends - 4

relocation - 4

moving - 4

adulthood - 4

household income - 4

immigrated - 4

saving - 4

geographically - 4

gdp - 4

recession exposure - 4

maternal - 4

discrimination - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms census - 4

emission - 4

pollution - 4

pollutant - 4

pollution exposure - 4

employment count - 4

workers earnings - 4

surveys censuses - 4

corporation - 4

exemption - 4

researcher - 3

postsecondary - 3

incorporated - 3

decade - 3

disability - 3

finance - 3

lender - 3

renter - 3

prevalence - 3

income individuals - 3

family income - 3

provided census - 3

taxable - 3

survey households - 3

geographic - 3

aging - 3

schooling - 3

poor - 3

regressing - 3

regress - 3

exposure - 3

income white - 3

invention - 3

inventory - 3

earnings age - 3

earnings workers - 3

earnings mobility - 3

fertility - 3

endogeneity - 3

venture - 3

unemployment rates - 3

immigrant population - 3

assimilation - 3

financial - 3

earns - 3

metropolitan - 3

demography - 3

estimates employment - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 139


  • Working Paper

    Where to Build Affordable Housing? Evaluating the Tradeoffs of Location

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-62R

    How does the location of affordable housing affect tenant welfare, the distribution of assistance, and broader societal objectives such as racial integration? Using administrative data on tenants of units funded by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), we first show that characteristics such as race and proxies for need vary widely across neighborhoods. Despite fixed eligibility requirements, LIHTC developments in more opportunity-rich neighborhoods house tenants who are higher income, more educated, and far less likely to be Black. To quantify the welfare implications, we build a residential choice model in which households choose from both market-rate and affordable housing options, where the latter must be rationed. While building affordable housing in higher-opportunity neighborhoods costs more, it also increases household welfare and reduces city-wide segregation. The gains in household welfare, however, accrue to more moderate-need, non-Black/Hispanic households at the expense of other households. This change in the distribution of assistance is primarily due to a 'crowding out' effect: households that only apply for assistance in higher-opportunity neighborhoods crowd out those willing to apply regardless of location. Finally, other policy levers'such as lowering the income limits used for means-testing'have only limited effects relative to the choice of location.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Producing U.S. Population Statistics Using Multiple Administrative Sources

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-58

    We identify several challenges encountered when constructing U.S. administrative record-based (AR-based) population estimates for 2020. Though the AR estimates are higher than the 2020 Census at the national level, they are over 15 percent lower in 5 percent of counties, suggesting that locational accuracy can be improved. Other challenges include how to achieve comprehensive coverage, maintain consistent coverage across time, filter out nonresidents and people not alive on the reference date, uncover missing links across person and address records, and predict demographic characteristics when multiple ones are reported or when they are missing. We discuss several ways of addressing these issues, e.g., building in redundancy with more sources, linking children to their parents' addresses, and conducting additional record linkage for people without Social Security Numbers and for addresses not initially linked to the Census Bureau's Master Address File. We discuss modeling to predict lower levels of geography for people lacking those geocodes, the probability that a person is a U.S. resident on the reference date, the probability that an address is the person's residence on the reference date, and the probability a person is in each demographic characteristic category. Regression results illustrate how many of these challenges and solutions affect the AR county population estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Economic Geography of Lifecycle Human Capital Accumulation: The Competing Effects of Labor Markets and Childhood Environments

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-54

    We examine how place shapes the production of human capital across the lifecycle. We ask: do those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood also have local labor markets that do so in adulthood? We begin by modeling wages across place as driven by 1) location-specific wage premiums, 2) adult human capital accumulation due to local labor market exposure, and 3) childhood human capital accumulation. We construct estimates of location wage premiums using AKM style estimates of movers across US commuting zones and validate these estimates using evidence from plausibly exogenous out migration from New Orleans in response to Hurricane Katrina. Next, we examine differential earnings trajectories among movers to construct estimates of human capital accumulation due to labor market exposure. We validate these estimates using wage changes of multi-time movers. Finally, we estimate the impact of place on childhood human capital production using age variation in moves during childhood. Crucially, our estimates of location wage premiums and adult human capital accumulation allow us to construct estimates of the causal effect of place during childhood that are not confounded by correlated labor market exposure. Using these estimates, we show there is a tradeoff between those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood and the local labor markets that do so in adulthood. We find that each 1-rank increase in earnings due to adult labor market exposure trades off with a 0.43 rank decrease in earnings due to the local childhood environment. This pattern is closely linked to city size, as adult human capital accumulation generally increases with city size, while childhood human capital accumulation falls. These divergent trajectories are associated with differences in both the physical structure of cities and the nature of social interaction therein. There is no tradeoff present in the largest cities, which provide greater exposure to high-wage earners and higher levels of local investment. Finally, we examine how these patterns are reflected in local rents. Location wage premia are heavily capitalized into rents, but the determinants of lifecycle human capital accumulation are not.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Noncitizen Coverage and Its Effects on U.S. Population Statistics

    August 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-42

    We produce population estimates with the same reference date, April 1, 2020, as the 2020 Census of Population and Housing by combining 31 types of administrative record (AR) and third-party sources, including several new to the Census Bureau with a focus on noncitizens. Our AR census national population estimate is higher than other Census Bureau official estimates: 1.8% greater than the 2020 Demographic Analysis high estimate, 3.0% more than the 2020 Census count, and 3.6% higher than the vintage-2020 Population Estimates Program estimate. Our analysis suggests that inclusion of more noncitizens, especially those with unknown legal status, explains the higher AR census estimate. About 19.8% of AR census noncitizens have addresses that cannot be linked to an address in the 2020 Census collection universe, compared to 5.7% of citizens, raising the possibility that the 2020 Census did not collect data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing in the United States under the residency criteria used for the census. We show differences in estimates by age, sex, Hispanic origin, geography, and socioeconomic characteristics symptomatic of the differences in noncitizen coverage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Eviction and Poverty in American Cities

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-37

    More than two million U.S. households have an eviction case filed against them each year. Policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels are increasingly pursuing policies to reduce the number of evictions, citing harm to tenants and high public expenditures related to homelessness. We study the consequences of eviction for tenants using newly linked administrative data from two major urban areas: Cook County (which includes Chicago) and New York City. We document that prior to housing court, tenants experience declines in earnings and employment and increases in financial distress and hospital visits. These pre-trends pose a challenge for disentangling correlation and causation. To address this problem, we use an instrumental variables approach based on cases randomly assigned to judges of varying leniency. We find that an eviction order increases homelessness and hospital visits and reduces earnings, durable goods consumption, and access to credit in the first two years. Effects on housing and labor market outcomes are driven by impacts for female and Black tenants. In the longer-run, eviction increases indebtedness and reduces credit scores.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Demographics of the Recipients of the First Economic Impact Payment

    May 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-24

    Starting in April 2020, the federal government began to distribute Economic Impact Payments (EIPs) in response to the health and economic crisis caused by COVID-19. More than 160 million payments were disbursed. We produce statistics concerning the receipt of EIPs by individuals and households across key demographic subgroups. We find that payments went out particularly quickly to households with children and lower-income households, and the rate of receipt was quite high for individuals over age 60, likely due to a coordinated effort to issue payments automatically to Social Security recipients. We disaggregate statistics by race/ethnicity to document whether racial disparities arose in EIP disbursement. Receipt rates were high overall, with limited differences across racial/ethnic subgroups. We provide a set of detailed counts in tables for use by the public.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating the U.S. Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) Using Blended Survey Data, Administrative Record Data, and Modeling: Technical Report

    April 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-21

    This report develops a method using administrative records (AR) to fill in responses for nonresponding American Community Survey (ACS) housing units rather than adjusting survey weights to account for selection of a subset of nonresponding housing units for follow-up interviews and for nonresponse bias. The method also inserts AR and modeling in place of edits and imputations for ACS survey citizenship item nonresponses. We produce Citizen Voting-Age Population (CVAP) tabulations using this enhanced CVAP method and compare them to published estimates. The enhanced CVAP method produces a 0.74 percentage point lower citizen share, and it is 3.05 percentage points lower for voting-age Hispanics. The latter result can be partly explained by omissions of voting-age Hispanic noncitizens with unknown legal status from ACS household responses. Weight adjustments may be less effective at addressing nonresponse bias under those conditions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Building the Prototype Census Environmental Impacts Frame

    April 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-20

    The natural environment is central to all aspects of life, but efforts to quantify its influence have been hindered by data availability and measurement constraints. To mitigate some of these challenges, we introduce a new prototype of a microdata infras tructure: the Census Environmental Impacts Frame (EIF). The EIF provides detailed individual-level information on demographics, economic characteristics, and address level histories ' linked to spatially and temporally resolved estimates of environmental conditions for each individual ' for almost every resident in the United States over the past two decades. This linked microdata infrastructure provides a unique platform for advancing our understanding about the distribution of environmental amenities and hazards, when, how, and why exposures have evolved over time, and the consequences of environmental inequality and changing environmental conditions. We describe the construction of the EIF, explore issues of coverage and data quality, document patterns and trends in individual exposure to two correlated but distinct air pollutants as an application of the EIF, and discuss implications and opportunities for future research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Self-Employment Income Reporting on Surveys

    April 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-19

    We examine the relation between administrative income data and survey reports for self-employed and wage-earning respondents from 2000 - 2015. The self-employed report 40 percent more wages and self-employment income in the survey than in tax administrative records; this estimate nets out differences between these two sources that are also shared by wage-earners. We provide evidence that differential reporting incentives are an important explanation of the larger self-employed gap by exploiting a well-known artifact ' self-employed respondents exhibit substantial bunching at the first EITC kink in their administrative records. We do not observe the same behavior in their survey responses even after accounting for survey measurement concerns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Full Report of the Comparisons of Administrative Record Rosters to Census Self-Responses and NRFU Household Member Responses

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-08

    One of the U.S. Census Bureau's innovations in the 2020 U.S. Census was the use of administrative records (AR) to create household rosters for enumerating some addresses when a self response was not available but high-quality ARs were. The goal was to reduce the cost of fieldwork during the Nonresponse Followup operation (NRFU). The original plan had NRFU beginning in mid-May and continuing through late July 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced the delay of NRFU and caused the Internal Revenue Service to postpone the income tax filing deadline, resulting in an interruption in the delivery of ARs to the U.S. Census Bureau. The delays were not anticipated when U.S. Census Bureau staff conducted the research on AR enumeration with the 2010 Census data in preparation for the 2020 Census or during the fine tuning of plans for using ARs during the 2018 End-to-End Census Test. These circumstances raised questions about whether the quality of the AR household rosters was high enough for use in enumeration. To aid in investigating the concern about the quality of the AR rosters, our analyses compared AR rosters to self-response rosters and NRFU household member responses at addresses where both ARs and a self-response were available.
    View Full Paper PDF