CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Social Security Number'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Protected Identification Key - 97

Internal Revenue Service - 95

American Community Survey - 92

Social Security Administration - 87

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 71

Current Population Survey - 69

Social Security - 65

Person Validation System - 53

Decennial Census - 43

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 42

Disclosure Review Board - 42

Employer Identification Numbers - 41

W-2 - 40

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 37

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 33

Person Identification Validation System - 32

Census Numident - 31

2010 Census - 31

Master Address File - 30

Personally Identifiable Information - 29

North American Industry Classification System - 29

Center for Economic Studies - 27

National Science Foundation - 25

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 24

Unemployment Insurance - 22

Ordinary Least Squares - 21

Longitudinal Business Database - 21

Business Register - 21

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 20

SSA Numident - 20

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 19

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 19

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 17

Earned Income Tax Credit - 17

Research Data Center - 17

Adjusted Gross Income - 16

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 16

Cornell University - 16

Service Annual Survey - 16

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 16

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 15

Administrative Records - 15

Detailed Earnings Records - 15

Medicaid Services - 14

Office of Management and Budget - 14

PSID - 14

National Bureau of Economic Research - 13

Social and Economic Supplement - 13

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 13

Some Other Race - 13

Housing and Urban Development - 13

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 13

Census Bureau Master Address File - 12

Census Bureau Business Register - 12

Census Household Composition Key - 12

Employment History File - 11

Individual Characteristics File - 11

1940 Census - 11

Economic Census - 11

National Institute on Aging - 11

CPS ASEC - 10

PIKed - 10

Federal Reserve Bank - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

National Center for Health Statistics - 10

Business Dynamics Statistics - 10

Standard Industrial Classification - 10

Employer Characteristics File - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

DOB - 10

Centers for Medicare - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Department of Labor - 9

Federal Tax Information - 9

County Business Patterns - 9

University of Chicago - 9

Indian Health Service - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

COVID-19 - 8

Selective Service System - 8

Disability Insurance - 8

Local Employment Dynamics - 8

Federal Reserve System - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 8

Core Based Statistical Area - 8

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 8

Postal Service - 8

National Opinion Research Center - 8

LEHD Program - 8

ASEC - 7

Department of Health and Human Services - 7

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 7

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 7

MAFID - 7

Health and Retirement Study - 7

Cumulative Density Function - 7

Census Edited File - 7

General Accounting Office - 7

Center for Administrative Records Research - 7

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 7

Data Management System - 7

Master Beneficiary Record - 7

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 7

Composite Person Record - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Indian Housing Information Center - 7

International Trade Research Report - 7

Master Earnings File - 7

Business Employment Dynamics - 7

Census 2000 - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 6

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 6

Opportunity Atlas - 6

Form W-2 - 6

Social Science Research Institute - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 6

Harvard University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

CDF - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Successor Predecessor File - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

American Economic Review - 6

MIT Press - 6

Economic Research Service - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Population Estimates Program - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Legal Form of Organization - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

NUMIDENT - 5

HHS - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 5

Business Master File - 5

Business Register Bridge - 5

Federal Register - 4

Food and Nutrition Service - 4

Federal Poverty Level - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Bureau of Labor - 4

Department of Education - 4

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 4

Department of State - 4

National Institutes of Health - 4

Educational Services - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

National Income and Product Accounts - 4

Supreme Court - 4

Customs and Border Protection - 4

AKM - 4

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 4

Department of Economics - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Linear Probability Models - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Limited Liability Company - 3

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 3

2SLS - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

Nonemployer Statistics - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Social Security Disability Insurance - 3

Board of Governors - 3

MTO - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Health Care and Social Assistance - 3

NBER Summer Institute - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Yale University - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 3

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 3

Special Sworn Status - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Summary Earnings Records - 3

Minnesota Population Center - 3

Multiple Worksite Report - 3

survey - 46

population - 42

employed - 38

respondent - 37

ethnicity - 31

census data - 31

hispanic - 30

census bureau - 28

earnings - 28

irs - 26

employ - 25

labor - 25

recession - 24

workforce - 24

immigrant - 23

socioeconomic - 22

disadvantaged - 22

intergenerational - 22

data census - 21

payroll - 21

tax - 19

resident - 19

ethnic - 19

earner - 19

employee - 19

family - 18

poverty - 18

1040 - 17

disparity - 17

residence - 17

minority - 17

citizen - 17

estimating - 16

ssa - 16

data - 16

federal - 15

statistical - 15

welfare - 15

agency - 15

record - 15

filing - 14

taxpayer - 14

medicaid - 14

racial - 14

use census - 13

migration - 13

migrant - 13

immigration - 13

residential - 12

generation - 12

matching - 12

race - 12

entrepreneur - 12

census responses - 12

enrollment - 12

housing - 11

economist - 11

census employment - 11

census survey - 11

unemployed - 11

report - 10

census use - 10

wealth - 10

mobility - 10

parent - 10

longitudinal - 10

worker - 10

salary - 10

datasets - 10

eligibility - 9

income data - 9

linked census - 9

segregation - 9

statistician - 9

state - 9

coverage - 9

entrepreneurship - 9

percentile - 9

assessed - 9

employment statistics - 9

census records - 9

revenue - 9

microdata - 9

econometric - 9

quarterly - 9

employee data - 9

records census - 9

neighborhood - 8

citizenship - 8

white - 8

proprietor - 8

survey income - 8

imputation - 8

employer household - 8

earn - 8

census research - 8

census file - 8

eligible - 7

research census - 7

enrollee - 7

income households - 7

mortality - 7

grandparent - 7

linkage - 7

residing - 7

parental - 7

work census - 7

employment data - 7

longitudinal employer - 7

migrate - 7

disclosure - 7

dependent - 7

census linked - 7

heterogeneity - 7

labor statistics - 7

database - 7

child - 6

censuses surveys - 6

2010 census - 6

enrolled - 6

poorer - 6

rent - 6

retirement - 6

enterprise - 6

workplace - 6

employment dynamics - 6

migrating - 6

income children - 6

income survey - 6

race census - 6

medicare - 6

census household - 6

macroeconomic - 6

employment earnings - 6

black - 6

workforce indicators - 6

occupation - 6

employment wages - 6

job - 6

identifier - 6

native - 6

census estimates - 5

household income - 5

estimates intergenerational - 5

household surveys - 5

yearly - 5

parents income - 5

department - 5

proprietorship - 5

latino - 5

loan - 5

trend - 5

hiring - 5

reside - 5

incentive - 5

expenditure - 5

impact - 5

environmental - 5

mexican - 5

recessionary - 5

estimation - 5

discrepancy - 5

associate - 5

industrial - 5

employing - 5

clerical - 5

ancestry - 5

matched - 5

wage data - 5

assessing - 5

prevalence - 4

provided census - 4

estimates census - 4

renter - 4

adopt - 4

bias - 4

sampling - 4

individuals census - 4

adoption - 4

graduate - 4

entrepreneurial - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

economic census - 4

asian - 4

insurance - 4

borrower - 4

lending - 4

employment estimates - 4

worker demographics - 4

employment trends - 4

relocation - 4

moving - 4

adulthood - 4

immigrated - 4

saving - 4

geographically - 4

gdp - 4

recession exposure - 4

maternal - 4

discrimination - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms census - 4

emission - 4

pollution - 4

pollutant - 4

pollution exposure - 4

employment count - 4

workers earnings - 4

surveys censuses - 4

corporation - 4

exemption - 4

credit - 3

filed - 3

fiscal - 3

available census - 3

sample census - 3

www census - 3

home - 3

homeowner - 3

mortgage - 3

rural - 3

economically - 3

geography - 3

amenity - 3

income housing - 3

researcher - 3

postsecondary - 3

incorporated - 3

decade - 3

disability - 3

finance - 3

lender - 3

income individuals - 3

family income - 3

taxable - 3

survey households - 3

geographic - 3

aging - 3

schooling - 3

poor - 3

regressing - 3

regress - 3

exposure - 3

income white - 3

invention - 3

inventory - 3

earnings age - 3

earnings workers - 3

earnings mobility - 3

fertility - 3

endogeneity - 3

venture - 3

unemployment rates - 3

immigrant population - 3

assimilation - 3

financial - 3

earns - 3

metropolitan - 3

demography - 3

estimates employment - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 145


  • Working Paper

    Measuring Income of the Aged in Household Surveys: Evidence from Linked Administrative Records

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-32

    Research has shown that household survey estimates of retirement income (defined benefit pensions and defined contribution account withdrawals) suffer from substantial underreporting which biases downward measures of financial well-being among the aged. Using data from both the redesigned 2016 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), each matched with administrative records, we examine to what extent underreporting of retirement income affects key statistics such as reliance on Social Security benefits and poverty among the aged. We find that underreporting of retirement income is still prevalent in the CPS ASEC. While the HRS does a better job than the CPS ASEC in terms of capturing retirement income, it still falls considerably short compared to administrative records. Consequently, the relative importance of Social Security income remains overstated in household surveys'53 percent of elderly beneficiaries in the CPS ASEC and 49 percent in the HRS rely on Social Security for the majority of their incomes compared to 42 percent in the linked administrative data. The poverty rate for those aged 65 and over is also overstated'8.8 percent in the CPS ASEC and 7.4 percent in the HRS compared to 6.4 percent in the linked administrative data. Our results illustrate the effects of using alternative data sources in producing key statistics from the Social Security Administration's Income of the Aged publication.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Citizenship Question Effects on Household Survey Response

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-31

    Several small-sample studies have predicted that a citizenship question in the 2020 Census would cause a large drop in self-response rates. In contrast, minimal effects were found in Poehler et al.'s (2020) analysis of the 2019 Census Test randomized controlled trial (RCT). We reconcile these findings by analyzing associations between characteristics about the addresses in the 2019 Census Test and their response behavior by linking to independently constructed administrative data. We find significant heterogeneity in sensitivity to the citizenship question among households containing Hispanics, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens. Response drops the most for households containing noncitizens ineligible for a Social Security number (SSN). It falls more for households with Latin American-born immigrants than those with immigrants from other countries. Response drops less for households with U.S.-born Hispanics than households with noncitizens from Latin America. Reductions in responsiveness occur not only through lower unit self-response rates, but also by increased household roster omissions and internet break-offs. The inclusion of a citizenship question increases the undercount of households with noncitizens. Households with noncitizens also have much higher citizenship question item nonresponse rates than those only containing citizens. The use of tract-level characteristics and significant heterogeneity among Hispanics, the foreign-born, and noncitizens help explain why the effects found by Poehler et al. were so small. Linking administrative microdata with the RCT data expands what we can learn from the RCT.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Mobility, Opportunity, and Volatility Statistics (MOVS): Infrastructure Files and Public Use Data

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-23

    Federal statistical agencies and policymakers have identified a need for integrated systems of household and personal income statistics. This interest marks a recognition that aggregated measures of income, such as GDP or average income growth, tell an incomplete story that may conceal large gaps in well-being between different types of individuals and families. Until recently, longitudinal income data that are rich enough to calculate detailed income statistics and include demographic characteristics, such as race and ethnicity, have not been available. The Mobility, Opportunity, and Volatility Statistics project (MOVS) fills this gap in comprehensive income statistics. Using linked demographic and tax records on the population of U.S. working-age adults, the MOVS project defines households and calculates household income, applying an equivalence scale to create a personal income concept, and then traces the progress of individuals' incomes over time. We then output a set of intermediate statistics by race-ethnicity group, sex, year, base-year state of residence, and base-year income decile. We select the intermediate statistics most useful in developing more complex intragenerational income mobility measures, such as transition matrices, income growth curves, and variance-based volatility statistics. We provide these intermediate statistics as part of a publicly released data tool with downloadable flat files and accompanying documentation. This paper describes the data build process and the output files, including a brief analysis highlighting the structure and content of our main statistics.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where Are Your Parents? Exploring Potential Bias in Administrative Records on Children

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-18

    This paper examines potential bias in the Census Household Composition Key's (CHCK) probabilistic parent-child linkages. By linking CHCK data to the American Community Survey (ACS), we reveal disparities in parent-child linkages among specific demographic groups and find that characteristics of children that can and cannot be linked to the CHCK vary considerably from the larger population. In particular, we find that children from low-income, less educated households and of Hispanic origin are less likely to be linked to a mother or a father in the CHCK. We also highlight some data considerations when using the CHCK.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Family Resources and Human Capital in Economic Downturns

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-15

    I study how recessions impact the human capital of young adults and how these effects vary over the parent income gradient. Using a novel confidential linked survey dataset from U.S. Census, I document that the negative effects of worse local unemployment shocks on educational attainment are strongly concentrated among middle-class children, with losses in parental home equity being potentially important mechanisms. To probe the aggregate implications of these findings and assess policy implications, I develop a model of selection into college and life-cycle earnings that comprises endogenous parental transfers for education, multiple schooling options, and uncertainty in post-graduation employment outcomes. Simulating a recession in the model produces a 'hollowing out the middle' in lifecycle earnings in the aggregate, and educational borrowing constraints play a key role in this result. Counterfactual policies to expand college access in response to the recession can mitigate these effects but struggle to be cost effective.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Long-Term Effects of Income for At-Risk Infants: Evidence from Supplemental Security Income

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-10

    This paper examines whether a generous cash intervention early in life can "undo" some of the long-term disadvantage associated with poor health at birth. We use new linkages between several large-scale administrative datasets to examine the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of providing low-income families with low birthweight infants support through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. This program uses a birthweight cutoff at 1200 grams to determine eligibility. We find that families of infants born just below this cutoff experience a large increase in cash benefits totaling about 27%of family income in the first three years of the infant's life. These cash benefits persist at lower amounts through age 10. Eligible infants also experience a small but statistically significant increase in Medicaid enrollment during childhood. We examine whether this support affects health care use and mortality in infancy, educational performance in high school, post-secondary school attendance and college degree attainment, and earnings, public assistance use, and mortality in young adulthood for all infants born in California to low-income families whose birthweight puts them near the cutoff. We also examine whether these payments had spillover effects onto the older siblings of these infants who may have also benefited from the increase in family resources. Despite the comprehensive nature of this early life intervention, we detect no improvements in any of the study outcomes, nor do we find improvements among the older siblings of these infants. These null effects persist across several subgroups and alternative model specifications, and, for some outcomes, our estimates are precise enough to rule out published estimates of the effect of early life cash transfers in other settings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Where to Build Affordable Housing? Evaluating the Tradeoffs of Location

    December 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-62R

    How does the location of affordable housing affect tenant welfare, the distribution of assistance, and broader societal objectives such as racial integration? Using administrative data on tenants of units funded by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), we first show that characteristics such as race and proxies for need vary widely across neighborhoods. Despite fixed eligibility requirements, LIHTC developments in more opportunity-rich neighborhoods house tenants who are higher income, more educated, and far less likely to be Black. To quantify the welfare implications, we build a residential choice model in which households choose from both market-rate and affordable housing options, where the latter must be rationed. While building affordable housing in higher-opportunity neighborhoods costs more, it also increases household welfare and reduces city-wide segregation. The gains in household welfare, however, accrue to more moderate-need, non-Black/Hispanic households at the expense of other households. This change in the distribution of assistance is primarily due to a 'crowding out' effect: households that only apply for assistance in higher-opportunity neighborhoods crowd out those willing to apply regardless of location. Finally, other policy levers'such as lowering the income limits used for means-testing'have only limited effects relative to the choice of location.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Producing U.S. Population Statistics Using Multiple Administrative Sources

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-58

    We identify several challenges encountered when constructing U.S. administrative record-based (AR-based) population estimates for 2020. Though the AR estimates are higher than the 2020 Census at the national level, they are over 15 percent lower in 5 percent of counties, suggesting that locational accuracy can be improved. Other challenges include how to achieve comprehensive coverage, maintain consistent coverage across time, filter out nonresidents and people not alive on the reference date, uncover missing links across person and address records, and predict demographic characteristics when multiple ones are reported or when they are missing. We discuss several ways of addressing these issues, e.g., building in redundancy with more sources, linking children to their parents' addresses, and conducting additional record linkage for people without Social Security Numbers and for addresses not initially linked to the Census Bureau's Master Address File. We discuss modeling to predict lower levels of geography for people lacking those geocodes, the probability that a person is a U.S. resident on the reference date, the probability that an address is the person's residence on the reference date, and the probability a person is in each demographic characteristic category. Regression results illustrate how many of these challenges and solutions affect the AR county population estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Economic Geography of Lifecycle Human Capital Accumulation: The Competing Effects of Labor Markets and Childhood Environments

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-54

    We examine how place shapes the production of human capital across the lifecycle. We ask: do those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood also have local labor markets that do so in adulthood? We begin by modeling wages across place as driven by 1) location-specific wage premiums, 2) adult human capital accumulation due to local labor market exposure, and 3) childhood human capital accumulation. We construct estimates of location wage premiums using AKM style estimates of movers across US commuting zones and validate these estimates using evidence from plausibly exogenous out migration from New Orleans in response to Hurricane Katrina. Next, we examine differential earnings trajectories among movers to construct estimates of human capital accumulation due to labor market exposure. We validate these estimates using wage changes of multi-time movers. Finally, we estimate the impact of place on childhood human capital production using age variation in moves during childhood. Crucially, our estimates of location wage premiums and adult human capital accumulation allow us to construct estimates of the causal effect of place during childhood that are not confounded by correlated labor market exposure. Using these estimates, we show there is a tradeoff between those places that most effectively produce human capital in childhood and the local labor markets that do so in adulthood. We find that each 1-rank increase in earnings due to adult labor market exposure trades off with a 0.43 rank decrease in earnings due to the local childhood environment. This pattern is closely linked to city size, as adult human capital accumulation generally increases with city size, while childhood human capital accumulation falls. These divergent trajectories are associated with differences in both the physical structure of cities and the nature of social interaction therein. There is no tradeoff present in the largest cities, which provide greater exposure to high-wage earners and higher levels of local investment. Finally, we examine how these patterns are reflected in local rents. Location wage premia are heavily capitalized into rents, but the determinants of lifecycle human capital accumulation are not.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Noncitizen Coverage and Its Effects on U.S. Population Statistics

    August 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-42

    We produce population estimates with the same reference date, April 1, 2020, as the 2020 Census of Population and Housing by combining 31 types of administrative record (AR) and third-party sources, including several new to the Census Bureau with a focus on noncitizens. Our AR census national population estimate is higher than other Census Bureau official estimates: 1.8% greater than the 2020 Demographic Analysis high estimate, 3.0% more than the 2020 Census count, and 3.6% higher than the vintage-2020 Population Estimates Program estimate. Our analysis suggests that inclusion of more noncitizens, especially those with unknown legal status, explains the higher AR census estimate. About 19.8% of AR census noncitizens have addresses that cannot be linked to an address in the 2020 Census collection universe, compared to 5.7% of citizens, raising the possibility that the 2020 Census did not collect data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing in the United States under the residency criteria used for the census. We show differences in estimates by age, sex, Hispanic origin, geography, and socioeconomic characteristics symptomatic of the differences in noncitizen coverage.
    View Full Paper PDF