CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Social Security'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 84

Social Security Administration - 79

Current Population Survey - 78

Protected Identification Key - 69

American Community Survey - 66

Social Security Number - 65

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 59

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 51

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 41

Person Validation System - 37

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 37

W-2 - 34

Employer Identification Numbers - 33

Center for Economic Studies - 30

Decennial Census - 29

North American Industry Classification System - 29

National Science Foundation - 29

Longitudinal Business Database - 25

Disclosure Review Board - 25

Person Identification Validation System - 22

2010 Census - 22

Ordinary Least Squares - 22

Business Register - 19

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 18

Disability Insurance - 18

PSID - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

Detailed Earnings Records - 18

Personally Identifiable Information - 17

Census Numident - 17

Master Address File - 17

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 17

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 16

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 16

Research Data Center - 16

National Bureau of Economic Research - 15

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 15

Economic Census - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

Earned Income Tax Credit - 15

Federal Reserve Bank - 15

Service Annual Survey - 15

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 15

County Business Patterns - 15

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 14

Social and Economic Supplement - 13

ASEC - 13

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 13

Adjusted Gross Income - 13

Medicaid Services - 13

Housing and Urban Development - 13

Master Beneficiary Record - 13

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 12

Cornell University - 12

Department of Labor - 11

Unemployment Insurance - 11

SSA Numident - 11

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 11

Standard Industrial Classification - 11

Centers for Medicare - 10

Special Sworn Status - 10

1940 Census - 10

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 10

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 10

National Institute on Aging - 10

CPS ASEC - 9

Administrative Records - 9

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

Population Estimates Program - 9

Census Bureau Master Address File - 9

University of Maryland - 9

Social Security Disability Insurance - 9

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 9

Census Household Composition Key - 9

Master Earnings File - 9

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 9

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 9

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 9

Summary Earnings Records - 9

Department of Health and Human Services - 8

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 8

Survey of Consumer Finances - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

NUMIDENT - 8

University of Chicago - 8

Indian Health Service - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Department of Agriculture - 7

Department of Homeland Security - 7

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 7

Urban Institute - 7

Social Science Research Institute - 7

Indian Housing Information Center - 7

Selective Service System - 7

Postal Service - 7

Some Other Race - 7

Form W-2 - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

MAFID - 6

Federal Reserve System - 6

Department of Economics - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

Data Management System - 6

Harvard University - 6

American Economic Association - 6

Office of Personnel Management - 6

Small Business Administration - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 6

Economic Research Service - 5

Food and Nutrition Service - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

COVID-19 - 5

MAF-ARF - 5

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 5

Individual Characteristics File - 5

General Accounting Office - 5

National Institutes of Health - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

Census of Manufactures - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Boston College - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

International Trade Research Report - 5

NBER Summer Institute - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Supreme Court - 5

Census Edited File - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Employer Characteristics File - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Retail Trade - 5

American Economic Review - 5

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 5

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Employment History File - 4

Local Employment Dynamics - 4

University of Michigan - 4

Department of State - 4

Technical Services - 4

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 4

Federal Tax Information - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Accommodation and Food Services - 4

Sloan Foundation - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Department of Commerce - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

HHS - 4

National Health Interview Survey - 4

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 4

2SLS - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Business Master File - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Federal Register - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

Federal Government - 3

Cumulative Density Function - 3

Department of Education - 3

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 3

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 3

Opportunity Atlas - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

Successor Predecessor File - 3

Stanford University - 3

Arts, Entertainment - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Society of Labor Economists - 3

Journal of Economic Literature - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

New York University - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Oil and Gas Extraction - 3

PIKed - 3

Council of Economic Advisers - 3

National Employer Survey - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

DOB - 3

Educational Services - 3

Agriculture, Forestry - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Business Employment Dynamics - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Securities and Exchange Commission - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

survey - 45

earnings - 42

respondent - 37

employed - 36

population - 35

employ - 32

labor - 30

recession - 28

earner - 26

workforce - 24

payroll - 22

irs - 21

poverty - 21

medicaid - 21

salary - 21

employee - 21

tax - 20

ethnicity - 20

ssa - 20

unemployed - 20

welfare - 19

census bureau - 19

economist - 19

family - 18

hispanic - 18

retirement - 18

census data - 17

enrollment - 17

data census - 16

socioeconomic - 16

taxpayer - 15

disparity - 15

data - 15

eligibility - 14

revenue - 14

minority - 14

agency - 14

estimating - 14

eligible - 13

disadvantaged - 13

intergenerational - 13

racial - 13

coverage - 13

immigrant - 13

worker - 13

earn - 13

federal - 12

1040 - 12

statistical - 12

incentive - 12

insurance - 12

race - 12

entrepreneur - 12

resident - 12

ethnic - 11

pension - 11

disability - 11

survey income - 11

citizen - 11

imputation - 11

econometric - 11

filing - 10

income data - 10

quarterly - 10

benefit - 10

datasets - 10

expenditure - 10

percentile - 10

census responses - 10

record - 10

enterprise - 10

report - 9

segregation - 9

generation - 9

statistician - 9

state - 9

entrepreneurship - 9

assessed - 9

microdata - 9

medicare - 9

immigration - 9

heterogeneity - 9

proprietor - 9

use census - 8

wealth - 8

residence - 8

white - 8

census survey - 8

venture - 8

endogeneity - 8

employment wages - 8

employment earnings - 8

black - 8

trend - 8

job - 8

employment statistics - 8

proprietorship - 8

census estimates - 7

average - 7

poorer - 7

yearly - 7

sampling - 7

migrant - 7

census records - 7

occupation - 7

retiree - 7

discrimination - 7

labor statistics - 7

estimates intergenerational - 6

mortality - 6

researcher - 6

study - 6

census employment - 6

parent - 6

macroeconomic - 6

citizenship - 6

compensation - 6

subsidy - 6

income survey - 6

workers earnings - 6

unemployment rates - 6

aging - 6

recessionary - 6

assessing - 6

entrepreneurial - 6

census research - 6

employee data - 6

uninsured - 6

insured - 6

fiscal - 5

prevalence - 5

provided census - 5

estimates census - 5

enrollee - 5

2010 census - 5

enrolled - 5

linked census - 5

economically - 5

housing - 5

neighborhood - 5

mobility - 5

research - 5

maternal - 5

propensity - 5

estimation - 5

company - 5

market - 5

migration - 5

employing - 5

increase employment - 5

saving - 5

segregated - 5

matching - 5

distribution - 5

schooling - 5

native - 5

gdp - 5

cohort - 5

growth - 5

business data - 5

sector - 5

establishment - 5

longitudinal - 5

credit - 4

child - 4

filed - 4

research census - 4

census use - 4

sample census - 4

censuses surveys - 4

sale - 4

rural - 4

residential - 4

adopt - 4

analysis - 4

department - 4

graduate - 4

career - 4

latino - 4

estimator - 4

population survey - 4

loan - 4

debt - 4

investment - 4

employment effects - 4

profit - 4

layoff - 4

reside - 4

adulthood - 4

household surveys - 4

survey households - 4

dependent - 4

impact - 4

census linked - 4

bias - 4

employment growth - 4

worker wages - 4

mexican - 4

census household - 4

patent - 4

patenting - 4

firms census - 4

income individuals - 4

discrepancy - 4

employment data - 4

employment trends - 4

health - 4

industrial - 4

earnings mobility - 4

surveys censuses - 4

workplace - 4

employment measures - 4

earnings inequality - 4

earnings growth - 4

production - 4

database - 4

corporation - 4

estimates employment - 4

impairment - 4

manufacturing - 4

health insurance - 4

insurance coverage - 4

wage earnings - 4

income year - 4

insurance employer - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

tenure - 4

available census - 3

restaurant - 3

geography - 3

amenity - 3

rent - 3

grandparent - 3

parents income - 3

adoption - 3

parental - 3

childcare - 3

residing - 3

degree - 3

indian - 3

survey data - 3

aggregate - 3

borrower - 3

lending - 3

financial - 3

incorporated - 3

funding - 3

fund - 3

acquisition - 3

relocation - 3

migrate - 3

shift - 3

hire - 3

taxable - 3

environmental - 3

declining - 3

exogeneity - 3

hiring - 3

taxation - 3

marriage - 3

couple - 3

records census - 3

identifier - 3

linkage - 3

education - 3

autoregressive - 3

decade - 3

poor - 3

birth - 3

policy - 3

census 2020 - 3

innovation - 3

inventory - 3

fertility - 3

income households - 3

work census - 3

family income - 3

coverage employer - 3

clerical - 3

worker demographics - 3

workforce indicators - 3

regress - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

employment unemployment - 3

employment recession - 3

educated - 3

employment dynamics - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

metropolitan - 3

measures employment - 3

inflation - 3

information - 3

organizational - 3

economic census - 3

census business - 3

earns - 3

demand - 3

effect wages - 3

wage data - 3

employment estimates - 3

businesses census - 3

effects employment - 3

healthcare - 3

insurance premiums - 3

manufacturer - 3

income distributions - 3

Viewing papers 31 through 40 of 148


  • Working Paper

    Who Marries Whom? The Role of Segregation by Race and Class

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-30

    Americans rarely marry outside of their race or class group. We distinguish between two possible explanations: a lack of exposure to other groups versus a preference to marry within group. We develop an instrument for neighborhood exposure to opposite-sex members of other race and class groups using variation in sex ratios among nearby birth cohorts in childhood neighborhoods. We then test whether increased exposure results in more interracial (white-Black) and interclass (top-to-bottom parent income quartile) marriages. Increased exposure to opposite-sex members of other class groups generates a substantial increase in interclass marriage, but increased exposure to other race groups has no detectable effect on interracial marriage. We use these results to estimate a spatial model of the marriage market and quantify the impact of reducing residential segregation in general equilibrium. For small changes in exposure, the model implies effects in line with recent estimates from policy experiments. We then use the model to assess the overall contribution of segregation and find that residential segregation has large effects on interclass, but not interracial, marriage.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gradient Boosting to Address Statistical Problems Arising from Non-Linkage of Census Bureau Datasets

    June 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-27

    This article introduces the twangRDC package, which contains functions to address non-linkage in US Census Bureau datasets. The Census Bureau's Person Identification Validation System facilitates data linkage by assigning unique person identifiers to federal, third party, decennial census, and survey data. Not all records in these datasets can be linked to the reference file and as such not all records will be assigned an identifier. This article is a tutorial for using the twangRDC to generate nonresponse weights to account for non-linkage of person records across US Census Bureau datasets.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    School Equalization in the Shadow of Jim Crow: Causes and Consequences of Resource Disparity in Mississippi circa 1940

    May 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-25

    A school finance equalization program established in Mississippi in 1920 failed to help many of the state's Black students'an outcome that was typical in the segregated U.S. South (Horace Mann Bond, 1934). In majority-Black school districts, local decision-makers overwhelmingly favored white schools when allotting funds from the state's preexisting per capita fund, and the resulting high expenditures on white students rendered these districts ineligible for the equalization program. Thus, while Black students residing in majority-white districts benefitted from increased spending and standards for Black schools, those in majority-Black districts continued to experience extremely low'and even worsening'school funding. We model the processes that led the so-called equalization policy to create disparities in schooling resources for Black students, and estimate effects on Black children using both a neighboring-counties design and an IV strategy. We find that local educational spending had large impacts on Black enrollment rates, as reported in the 1940 census, with Black educational attainment increasing in marginal spending. Finally, we link the 1940 and 2000 censuses to show that Black children exposed to higher levels of school expenditures had significantly more completed schooling and higher income late in life.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Lifecycle Earnings Volatility

    April 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-21

    We present new estimates of earnings volatility over time and the lifecycle for men and women by race and human capital. Using a long panel of restricted-access administrative Social Security earnings linked to the Current Population Survey, we estimate volatility with both transparent summary measures, as well as decompositions into permanent and transitory components. From the late 1970s to the mid 1990s there is a strong negative trend in earnings volatility for both men and women. We show this is driven by a reduction in transitory variance. Starting in the mid 1990s there is relative stability in trends of male earnings volatility because of an increase in the variance of permanent shocks, especially among workers without a college education, and a more attenuated trend decline among women. Cohort analyses indicate a strong U-shape pattern of volatility over the working life, which comes from large permanent shocks early and later in the lifecycle. However, this U-shape shifted downward and leftward in more recent cohorts, the latter from the fanning out of lifecycle transitory volatility in younger cohorts. These patterns are more pronounced among White men and women compared to Black workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Long-Term Effects of Income for At-Risk Infants: Evidence from Supplemental Security Income

    March 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-10

    This paper examines whether a generous cash intervention early in life can "undo" some of the long-term disadvantage associated with poor health at birth. We use new linkages between several large-scale administrative datasets to examine the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of providing low-income families with low birthweight infants support through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. This program uses a birthweight cutoff at 1200 grams to determine eligibility. We find that families of infants born just below this cutoff experience a large increase in cash benefits totaling about 27%of family income in the first three years of the infant's life. These cash benefits persist at lower amounts through age 10. Eligible infants also experience a small but statistically significant increase in Medicaid enrollment during childhood. We examine whether this support affects health care use and mortality in infancy, educational performance in high school, post-secondary school attendance and college degree attainment, and earnings, public assistance use, and mortality in young adulthood for all infants born in California to low-income families whose birthweight puts them near the cutoff. We also examine whether these payments had spillover effects onto the older siblings of these infants who may have also benefited from the increase in family resources. Despite the comprehensive nature of this early life intervention, we detect no improvements in any of the study outcomes, nor do we find improvements among the older siblings of these infants. These null effects persist across several subgroups and alternative model specifications, and, for some outcomes, our estimates are precise enough to rule out published estimates of the effect of early life cash transfers in other settings.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Icing on the Cake: The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Income Data Quality in the SIPP

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-03

    Accurate measurement of key income variables plays a crucial role in economic research and policy decision-making. However, the presence of item nonresponse and measurement error in survey data can cause biased estimates. These biases can subsequently lead to sub-optimal policy decisions and inefficient allocation of resources. While there have been various studies documenting item nonresponse and measurement error in economic data, there have not been many studies investigating interventions that could reduce item nonresponse and measurement error. In our research, we investigate the impact of monetary incentives on reducing item nonresponse and measurement error for labor and investment income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Our study utilizes a randomized incentive experiment in Waves 1 and 2 of the 2014 SIPP, which allows us to assess the effectiveness of incentives in reducing item nonresponse and measurement error. We find that households receiving incentives had item nonresponse rates that are 1.3 percentage points lower for earnings and 1.5 percentage points lower for Social Security income. Measurement error was 6.31 percentage points lower at the intensive margin for interest income, and 16.48 percentage points lower for dividend income compared to non-incentive recipient households. These findings provide valuable insights for data producers and users and highlight the importance of implementing strategies to improve data quality in economic research.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Incorporating Administrative Data in Survey Weights for the Basic Monthly Current Population Survey

    January 2024

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-24-02

    Response rates to the Current Population Survey (CPS) have declined over time, raising the potential for nonresponse bias in key population statistics. A potential solution is to leverage administrative data from government agencies and third-party data providers when constructing survey weights. In this paper, we take two approaches. First, we use administrative data to build a non-parametric nonresponse adjustment step while leaving the calibration to population estimates unchanged. Second, we use administratively linked data in the calibration process, matching income data from the Internal Return Service and state agencies, demographic data from the Social Security Administration and the decennial census, and industry data from the Census Bureau's Business Register to both responding and nonresponding households. We use the matched data in the household nonresponse adjustment of the CPS weighting algorithm, which changes the weights of respondents to account for differential nonresponse rates among subpopulations. After running the experimental weighting algorithm, we compare estimates of the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate between the experimental weights and the production weights. Before March 2020, estimates of the labor force participation rates using the experimental weights are 0.2 percentage points higher than the original estimates, with minimal effect on unemployment rate. After March 2020, the new labor force participation rates are similar, but the unemployment rate is about 0.2 percentage points higher in some months during the height of COVID-related interviewing restrictions. These results are suggestive that if there is any nonresponse bias present in the CPS, the magnitude is comparable to the typical margin of error of the unemployment rate estimate. Additionally, the results are overall similar across demographic groups and states, as well as using alternative weighting methodology. Finally, we discuss how our estimates compare to those from earlier papers that calculate estimates of bias in key CPS labor force statistics. This paper is for research purposes only. No changes to production are being implemented at this time.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Producing U.S. Population Statistics Using Multiple Administrative Sources

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-58

    We identify several challenges encountered when constructing U.S. administrative record-based (AR-based) population estimates for 2020. Though the AR estimates are higher than the 2020 Census at the national level, they are over 15 percent lower in 5 percent of counties, suggesting that locational accuracy can be improved. Other challenges include how to achieve comprehensive coverage, maintain consistent coverage across time, filter out nonresidents and people not alive on the reference date, uncover missing links across person and address records, and predict demographic characteristics when multiple ones are reported or when they are missing. We discuss several ways of addressing these issues, e.g., building in redundancy with more sources, linking children to their parents' addresses, and conducting additional record linkage for people without Social Security Numbers and for addresses not initially linked to the Census Bureau's Master Address File. We discuss modeling to predict lower levels of geography for people lacking those geocodes, the probability that a person is a U.S. resident on the reference date, the probability that an address is the person's residence on the reference date, and the probability a person is in each demographic characteristic category. Regression results illustrate how many of these challenges and solutions affect the AR county population estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are Immigrants More Innovative? Evidence from Entrepreneurs

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-56

    We evaluate the contributions of immigrant entrepreneurs to innovation in the U.S. using linked survey-administrative data on 199,000 firms with a rich set of innovation measures and other firm and owner characteristics. We find that not only are immigrants more likely than natives to own businesses, but on average their firms display more innovation activities and outcomes. Immigrant owned firms are particularly more likely to create completely new products, improve previous products, use new processes, and engage in both basic and applied R&D, and their efforts are reflected in substantially higher levels of patents and productivity. Immigrant owners are slightly less likely than natives to imitate products of others and to hire more employees. Delving into potential explanations of the immigrant-native differences, we study other characteristics of entrepreneurs, access to finance, choice of industry, immigrant self-selection, and effects of diversity. We find that the immigrant innovation advantage is robust to controlling for detailed characteristics of firms and owners, it holds in both high-tech and non-high-tech industries and, with the exception of productivity, it tends to be even stronger in firms owned by diverse immigrant-native teams and by diverse immigrants from different countries. The evidence from nearly all measures that immigrants tend to operate more innovative and productive firms, together with the higher share of business ownership by immigrants, implies large contributions to U.S. innovation and growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Noncitizen Coverage and Its Effects on U.S. Population Statistics

    August 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-42

    We produce population estimates with the same reference date, April 1, 2020, as the 2020 Census of Population and Housing by combining 31 types of administrative record (AR) and third-party sources, including several new to the Census Bureau with a focus on noncitizens. Our AR census national population estimate is higher than other Census Bureau official estimates: 1.8% greater than the 2020 Demographic Analysis high estimate, 3.0% more than the 2020 Census count, and 3.6% higher than the vintage-2020 Population Estimates Program estimate. Our analysis suggests that inclusion of more noncitizens, especially those with unknown legal status, explains the higher AR census estimate. About 19.8% of AR census noncitizens have addresses that cannot be linked to an address in the 2020 Census collection universe, compared to 5.7% of citizens, raising the possibility that the 2020 Census did not collect data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing in the United States under the residency criteria used for the census. We show differences in estimates by age, sex, Hispanic origin, geography, and socioeconomic characteristics symptomatic of the differences in noncitizen coverage.
    View Full Paper PDF