CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Economic Census'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

North American Industry Classification System - 95

Longitudinal Business Database - 86

Center for Economic Studies - 72

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 67

Internal Revenue Service - 52

Standard Industrial Classification - 48

National Science Foundation - 47

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 43

Business Register - 41

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 40

Employer Identification Numbers - 40

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 39

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 36

Total Factor Productivity - 36

National Bureau of Economic Research - 35

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 32

Census Bureau Business Register - 30

Census of Manufactures - 29

County Business Patterns - 29

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 26

Current Population Survey - 25

Disclosure Review Board - 24

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 24

Federal Reserve Bank - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 23

Business Dynamics Statistics - 22

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 21

Research Data Center - 21

Census of Retail Trade - 20

Social Security Administration - 20

Service Annual Survey - 20

Company Organization Survey - 19

American Community Survey - 17

Longitudinal Research Database - 17

Wholesale Trade - 16

Retail Trade - 16

Social Security - 14

Small Business Administration - 14

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 14

Office of Management and Budget - 13

Decennial Census - 13

Survey of Business Owners - 12

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 12

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 12

University of Chicago - 12

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 12

Cornell University - 12

Technical Services - 11

Social Security Number - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 11

Cobb-Douglas - 10

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 10

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 10

Postal Service - 10

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 9

University of Maryland - 9

Federal Reserve System - 9

Census of Services - 9

2010 Census - 9

Patent and Trademark Office - 9

Department of Labor - 9

TFPQ - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 9

Permanent Plant Number - 9

Annual Business Survey - 8

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 8

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

IBM - 7

Harmonized System - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

National Center for Health Statistics - 7

Business Services - 7

Bureau of Labor - 7

Kauffman Foundation - 7

Electronic Data Interchange - 7

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Business Master File - 7

Educational Services - 6

Duke University - 6

Local Employment Dynamics - 6

European Union - 6

Department of Homeland Security - 6

Department of Agriculture - 6

Protected Identification Key - 6

NBER Summer Institute - 6

Sloan Foundation - 6

Federal Trade Commission - 6

National Employer Survey - 6

Statistics Canada - 6

Wal-Mart - 6

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 6

National Institute on Aging - 6

Master Address File - 5

University of California Los Angeles - 5

IQR - 5

Employment History File - 5

Employer Characteristics File - 5

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 5

Foreign Direct Investment - 5

Unemployment Insurance - 5

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 5

Boston College - 5

Generalized Method of Moments - 5

TFPR - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Energy Information Administration - 5

American Economic Association - 5

Business Formation Statistics - 5

Environmental Protection Agency - 5

COMPUSTAT - 5

COVID-19 - 5

Labor Productivity - 5

AKM - 5

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 5

University of Michigan - 5

Computer Network Use Supplement - 5

Commodity Flow Survey - 5

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Professional Services - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

World Trade Organization - 4

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 4

Public Administration - 4

Individual Characteristics File - 4

Initial Public Offering - 4

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 4

2SLS - 4

Retirement History Survey - 4

Department of Justice - 4

Georgetown University - 4

Department of Economics - 4

North American Industry Classi - 4

Paycheck Protection Program - 4

Business Employment Dynamics - 4

Occupational Employment Statistics - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Federal Statistical System - 4

Chicago RDC - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

Center for Research in Security Prices - 3

CDF - 3

Cumulative Density Function - 3

European Commission - 3

Value Added - 3

Federal Register - 3

W-2 - 3

International Trade Commission - 3

National Establishment Time Series - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Data Management System - 3

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Limited Liability Company - 3

United Nations - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

Nonemployer Statistics - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

Core Based Statistical Area - 3

Department of Education - 3

Federal Tax Information - 3

American Statistical Association - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Journal of Labor Economics - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

International Standard Industrial Classification - 3

World Bank - 3

Review of Economics and Statistics - 3

MIT Press - 3

IZA - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 3

manufacturing - 45

sector - 41

production - 40

sale - 38

market - 37

revenue - 36

growth - 34

enterprise - 34

labor - 29

payroll - 28

industrial - 28

econometric - 27

economic census - 27

company - 26

agency - 26

survey - 26

expenditure - 25

workforce - 24

estimating - 22

employ - 22

organizational - 21

employed - 21

export - 20

economist - 20

establishment - 20

employee - 20

macroeconomic - 19

gdp - 18

wholesale - 18

recession - 18

investment - 17

earnings - 17

report - 17

innovation - 17

data - 17

census bureau - 16

acquisition - 16

produce - 16

quarterly - 16

demand - 15

manufacturer - 15

proprietorship - 15

technological - 14

inventory - 14

retail - 14

statistical - 14

monopolistic - 13

incorporated - 13

retailer - 13

microdata - 13

aggregate - 13

patent - 12

productive - 12

efficiency - 12

census data - 12

multinational - 12

research census - 11

entrepreneur - 11

economically - 11

salary - 11

profit - 11

endogeneity - 11

data census - 11

accounting - 10

trend - 10

profitability - 10

commerce - 10

respondent - 10

proprietor - 10

datasets - 10

corporate - 9

warehousing - 9

estimation - 9

population - 9

productivity dispersion - 9

import - 9

exporter - 9

productivity dynamics - 9

incentive - 9

ownership - 9

census business - 9

spillover - 8

record - 8

customer - 8

warehouse - 8

employment data - 8

venture - 8

entrepreneurship - 8

competitor - 8

researcher - 8

corporation - 8

consumption - 8

productivity growth - 8

metropolitan - 8

finance - 7

monopolistically - 7

diversification - 7

disclosure - 7

information census - 7

merger - 7

factory - 7

restaurant - 7

employment growth - 7

heterogeneity - 7

longitudinal - 7

business data - 7

census years - 7

research - 7

consumer - 7

marketing - 6

regress - 6

financial - 6

store - 6

grocery - 6

censuses surveys - 6

subsidiary - 6

competitiveness - 6

innovate - 6

wages productivity - 6

patenting - 6

innovative - 6

outsourced - 6

specialization - 6

industry concentration - 6

labor productivity - 6

productivity measures - 6

labor statistics - 6

employment estimates - 6

outsourcing - 6

franchising - 6

manager - 6

database - 6

businesses census - 6

regression - 6

estimates productivity - 6

economic statistics - 6

statistician - 6

study - 6

depreciation - 5

innovator - 5

aggregation - 5

oligopolistic - 5

relocation - 5

reporting - 5

irs - 5

work census - 5

census employment - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

exporting - 5

diversify - 5

firms size - 5

industry variation - 5

reallocation productivity - 5

state - 5

city - 5

efficient - 5

energy - 5

federal - 5

department - 5

healthcare - 5

corp - 5

average - 5

managerial - 5

impact - 5

census survey - 5

use census - 5

census use - 5

worker - 5

franchise - 5

retailing - 5

development - 5

analysis - 5

workplace - 5

productivity plants - 5

technology - 5

employer household - 5

strategic - 4

diversified - 4

merchandise - 4

sector productivity - 4

investor - 4

invention - 4

growth productivity - 4

innovating - 4

firms patents - 4

job - 4

occupation - 4

conglomerate - 4

invest - 4

industry productivity - 4

firms grow - 4

productivity variation - 4

area - 4

geographically - 4

rent - 4

energy efficiency - 4

supplier - 4

matching - 4

coverage - 4

classified - 4

industry employment - 4

compensation - 4

management - 4

neighborhood - 4

establishments data - 4

surveys censuses - 4

commodity - 4

turnover - 4

estimates employment - 4

practices productivity - 4

econometrically - 4

owner - 4

productivity analysis - 4

firms census - 4

econometrician - 4

buyer - 4

aging - 4

computer - 4

spending - 3

equity - 3

exogeneity - 3

migrant - 3

shock - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

productivity distribution - 3

employment statistics - 3

employee data - 3

2010 census - 3

assessed - 3

provided census - 3

founder - 3

exported - 3

productivity impacts - 3

patents firms - 3

patenting firms - 3

firm patenting - 3

labor markets - 3

minority - 3

acquirer - 3

small firms - 3

investing - 3

stock - 3

externality - 3

competitive - 3

globalization - 3

aggregate productivity - 3

productivity increases - 3

industry growth - 3

regressing - 3

regional - 3

region - 3

urban - 3

relocate - 3

electricity - 3

budget - 3

renewable - 3

regulation - 3

policymakers - 3

discrimination - 3

business startups - 3

importer - 3

sourcing - 3

medicare - 3

medicaid - 3

industries estimate - 3

utilization - 3

classification - 3

fuel - 3

emission - 3

wage growth - 3

indicator - 3

country - 3

trademark - 3

growth employment - 3

executive - 3

workers earnings - 3

earner - 3

rural - 3

pandemic - 3

insurance - 3

health - 3

hurricane - 3

public - 3

price - 3

earnings inequality - 3

franchisor - 3

franchise establishments - 3

measures employment - 3

privacy - 3

publicly - 3

measures productivity - 3

supermarket - 3

productivity firms - 3

agriculture - 3

model - 3

geography - 3

geographic - 3

confidentiality - 3

layoff - 3

resident - 3

network - 3

producing - 3

plant productivity - 3

manufacturing productivity - 3

larger firms - 3

employment production - 3

employment dynamics - 3

longitudinal employer - 3

paper census - 3

Viewing papers 21 through 30 of 162


  • Working Paper

    Local and National Concentration Trends in Jobs and Sales: The Role of Structural Transformation

    November 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-59

    National U.S. industrial concentration rose between 1992-2017. Simultaneously, the Herfindhahl Index of local (six-digit-NAICS by county) employment concentration fell. This divergence between national and local employment concentration is due to structural transformation. Both sales and employment concentration rose within industry-by-county cells. But activity shifted from concentrated Manufacturing towards relatively un-concentrated Services. A stronger between-sector shift in employment relative to sales explains the fall in local employment concentration. Had sectoral employment shares remained at their 1992 levels, average local employment concentration would have risen by 9% by 2017 rather than falling by 7%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Output Market Power and Spatial Misallocation

    November 2023

    Authors: Santiago Franco

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-57

    Most product industries are local. In the U.S., firms selling goods and services to local consumers account for half of total sales and generate more than sixty percent of the nation's jobs. Competition in these industries occurs in local product markets: cities. I propose a theory of such competition in which firms have output market power. Spatial differences in local competition arise endogenously due to the spatial sorting of heterogeneous firms. The ability to charge higher markups induces more productive firms to overvalue locating in larger cities, leading to a misallocation of firms across space. The optimal policy incen tivizes productive firms to relocate to smaller cities, providing a rationale for commonly used place-based policies. I use U.S. Census establishment-level data to estimate markups and to structurally estimate the model. I document a significant heterogeneity in markups for local industries across U.S. cities. Cities in the top decile of the city-size distribution have a fifty percent lower markup than cities in the bottom decile. I use the estimated model to quantify the general equilibrium effects of place-based policies. Policies that remove markups and relocate firms to smaller cities yield sizable aggregate welfare gains.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Impact of Industrial Opt-Out from Utility Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs

    October 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-52

    Industry accounts for one-third of energy consumption in the US. Studies suggest that energy efficiency opportunities represent a potential energy resource for regulated utilities and have resulted in rate of return regulated demand-side management (DSM) and energy efficiency (EE) programs. However, many large customers are allowed to self-direct or opt-out. In the Carolinas (NC and SC), over half of industrial and large commercial customers have selected to opt out. Although these customers claim they invest in EE improvements when it is economic and cost-effective to do so, there is no mechanism to validate whether they actually achieved energy savings. This project examines the industrial energy efficiency between the program participants and non participants in the Carolinas by utilizing the non-public Census of Manufacturing data and the public list of firms that have chosen to opt out. We compare the relative energy efficiency between the stay-in and opt-out plants. The t-test results suggest opt-out plants are less efficient. However, the opt-out decisions are not random; large plants or plants belonging to large firms are more likely to opt out, possibly because they have more information and resources. We conduct a propensity score matching method to account for factors that could affect the opt-out decisions. We find that the opt-out plants perform at least as well or slightly better than the stay-in plants. The relative performance of the opt-out firms suggest that they may not need utility program resources to obtain similar levels of efficiency from the stay-in group.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Antitrust Enforcement Increases Economic Activity

    October 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-50

    We hand-collect and standardize information describing all 3,055 antitrust law suits brought by the Department of Justice (DOJ) between 1971 and 2018. Using restricted establishment-level microdata from the U.S. Census, we compare the economic outcomes of a non-tradable industry in states targeted by DOJ antitrust lawsuits to outcomes of the same industry in other states that were not targeted. We document that DOJ antitrust enforcement actions permanently increase employment by 5.4% and business formation by 4.1%. Using an event-study design, we find (1) a sharp increase in payroll that exceeds the increase in employment, meaning that DOJ antitrust enforcement increases average wages, (2) an economically smaller increase in sales that is statistically insignificant, and (3) a precise increase in the labor share. While we cannot separately measure the quantity and price of output, the increase in production inputs (employment), together with a proportionally smaller increase in sales, strongly suggests that these DOJ antitrust enforcement actions increase the quantity of output and simultaneously decrease the price of output. Our results show that government antitrust enforcement leads to persistently higher levels of economic activity in targeted industries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Local Origins of Business Formation: Entry as a Two-Stage Process

    July 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-34R

    The business entry literature typically observes firms only at the first hire. We provide a new perspective using linked administrative microdata tracking the universe of U.S. business applications and their transition into employer firms. We model entry as a two-stage process: pursuit of a business idea (proxied by a business application) and implementation (transition). Results show these margins are distinct and associate differently with local conditions. While both margins matter, high-startup locations are characterized by high application intensity, whereas low-startup locations exhibit low transition rates, suggesting geographic disparities in entry arise from different dynamics at each stage of the entrepreneurial process.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Changing Firm and Country Boundaries of US Manufacturers in Global Value Chains

    July 2023

    Authors: Teresa C. Fort

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-38

    This paper documents how US firms organize goods production across firm and country boundaries. Most US firms that perform physical transformation tasks in-house using foreign manufacturing plants in 2007 also own US manufacturing plants; moreover manufacturing comprises their main domestic activity. By contrast, 'factoryless goods producers' outsource all physical transformation tasks to arm's-length contractors, focusing their in-house efforts on design and marketing. This distinct firm type is missing from standard analyses of manufacturing, growing in importance, and increasingly reliant on foreign suppliers. Physical transformation 'within-the-firm' thus coincides with substantial physical transformation 'within-the-country,' whereas its performance 'outside-the-firm' often also implies 'outside-the-country.' Despite these differences, factoryless goods producers and firms with foreign and domestic manufacturing plants both employ relatively high shares of US knowledge workers. These patterns call for new models and data to capture the potential for foreign production to support domestic innovation, which US firms leverage around the world.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Methodology on Creating the U.S. Linked Retail Health Clinic (LiRHC) Database

    March 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-10

    Retail health clinics (RHCs) are a relatively new type of health care setting and understanding the role they play as a source of ambulatory care in the United States is important. To better understand these settings, a joint project by the Census Bureau and National Center for Health Statistics used data science techniques to link together data on RHCs from Convenient Care Association, County Business Patterns Business Register, and National Plan and Provider Enumeration System to create the Linked RHC (LiRHC, pronounced 'lyric') database of locations throughout the United States during the years 2018 to 2020. The matching methodology used to perform this linkage is described, as well as the benchmarking, match statistics, and manual review and quality checks used to assess the resulting matched data. The large majority (81%) of matches received quality scores at or above 75/100, and most matches were linked in the first two (of eight) matching passes, indicating high confidence in the final linked dataset. The LiRHC database contained 2,000 RHCs and found that 97% of these clinics were in metropolitan statistical areas and 950 were in the South region of the United States. Through this collaborative effort, the Census Bureau and National Center for Health Statistics strive to understand how RHCs can potentially impact population health as well as the access and provision of health care services across the nation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Industry Linkages from Joint Production

    January 2023

    Authors: Xiang Ding

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-02

    I develop a theory of joint production to quantify aggregate economies of scope. In US manufacturing data, increased export demand in one industry raises a firm's sales in its other industries that share knowledge inputs like R&D and software. I estimate that knowledge inputs contribute to economies of scope through their scalability and partial non-rivalry within the firm. On average a 10 percent increase in output in one industry lowers prices in other industries by 0.4 percent. Such economies of scope manifest disproportionately among knowledge proximate industries and imply large spillover impacts of recent US-China trade policy on producer prices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Exploring New Ways to Classify Industries for Energy Analysis and Modeling

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-49

    Combustion, other emitting processes and fossil energy use outside the power sector have become urgent concerns given the United States' commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Industry is an important end user of energy and relies on fossil fuels used directly for process heating and as feedstocks for a diverse range of applications. Fuel and energy use by industry is heterogeneous, meaning even a single product group can vary broadly in its production routes and associated energy use. In the United States, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) serves as the standard for statistical data collection and reporting. In turn, data based on NAICS are the foundation of most United States energy modeling. Thus, the effectiveness of NAICS at representing energy use is a limiting condition for current expansive planning to improve energy efficiency and alternatives to fossil fuels in industry. Facility-level data could be used to build more detail into heterogeneous sectors and thus supplement data from Bureau of the Census and U.S Energy Information Administration reporting at NAICS code levels but are scarce. This work explores alternative classification schemes for industry based on energy use characteristics and validates an approach to estimate facility-level energy use from publicly available greenhouse gas emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The approaches in this study can facilitate understanding of current, as well as possible future, energy demand. First, current approaches to the construction of industrial taxonomies are summarized along with their usefulness for industrial energy modeling. Unsupervised machine learning techniques are then used to detect clusters in data reported from the U.S. Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Center program. Clusters of Industrial Assessment Center data show similar levels of correlation between energy use and explanatory variables as three-digit NAICS codes. Interestingly, the clusters each include a large cross section of NAICS codes, which lends additional support to the idea that NAICS may not be particularly suited for correlation between energy use and the variables studied. Fewer clusters are needed for the same level of correlation as shown in NAICS codes. Initial assessment shows a reasonable level of separation using support vector machines with higher than 80% accuracy, so machine learning approaches may be promising for further analysis. The IAC data is focused on smaller and medium-sized facilities and is biased toward higher energy users for a given facility type. Cladistics, an approach for classification developed in biology, is adapted to energy and process characteristics of industries. Cladistics applied to industrial systems seeks to understand the progression of organizations and technology as a type of evolution, wherein traits are inherited from previous systems but evolve due to the emergence of inventions and variations and a selection process driven by adaptation to pressures and favorable outcomes. A cladogram is presented for evolutionary directions in the iron and steel sector. Cladograms are a promising tool for constructing scenarios and summarizing directions of sectoral innovation. The cladogram of iron and steel is based on the drivers of energy use in the sector. Phylogenetic inference is similar to machine learning approaches as it is based on a machine-led search of the solution space, therefore avoiding some of the subjectivity of other classification systems. Our prototype approach for constructing an industry cladogram is based on process characteristics according to the innovation framework derived from Schumpeter to capture evolution in a given sector. The resulting cladogram represents a snapshot in time based on detailed study of process characteristics. This work could be an important tool for the design of scenarios for more detailed modeling. Cladograms reveal groupings of emerging or dominant processes and their implications in a way that may be helpful for policymakers and entrepreneurs, allowing them to see the larger picture, other good ideas, or competitors. Constructing a cladogram could be a good first step to analysis of many industries (e.g. nitrogenous fertilizer production, ethyl alcohol manufacturing), to understand their heterogeneity, emerging trends, and coherent groupings of related innovations. Finally, validation is performed for facility-level energy estimates from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Facility-level data availability continues to be a major challenge for industrial modeling. The method outlined by (McMillan et al. 2016; McMillan and Ruth 2019) allows estimating of facility level energy use based on mandatory greenhouse gas reporting. The validation provided here is an important step for further use of this data for industrial energy modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Drives Stagnation: Monopsony or Monopoly?

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-45

    Wages for the vast majority of workers have stagnated since the 1980s while productivity has grown. We investigate two coexisting explanations based on rising market power: 1. Monopsony, where dominant firms exploit the limited mobility of their own workers to pay lower wages; and 2. Monopoly, where dominant firms charge too high prices for what they sell, which lowers production and the demand for labor, and hence equilibrium wages economy-wide. Using establishment data from the US Census Bureau between 1997 and 2016, we find evidence of both monopoly and monopsony, where the former is rising over this period and the latter is stable. Both contribute to the decoupling of productivity and wage growth, with monopoly being the primary determinant: in 2016 monopoly accounts for 75% of wage stagnation, monopsony for 25%.
    View Full Paper PDF