CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 133

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 127

Disclosure Review Board - 125

North American Industry Classification System - 119

Longitudinal Business Database - 110

Internal Revenue Service - 110

Protected Identification Key - 88

Current Population Survey - 78

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 78

Social Security Administration - 77

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 67

Center for Economic Studies - 66

Social Security Number - 62

National Science Foundation - 62

Ordinary Least Squares - 59

Decennial Census - 58

Employer Identification Numbers - 56

Social Security - 52

National Bureau of Economic Research - 44

Business Register - 43

Person Validation System - 41

W-2 - 41

Economic Census - 35

Federal Reserve Bank - 35

2010 Census - 33

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 32

Business Dynamics Statistics - 31

Census Bureau Business Register - 29

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 28

Census Numident - 28

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 27

Total Factor Productivity - 26

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 26

Standard Industrial Classification - 25

Person Identification Validation System - 24

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 24

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 23

Master Address File - 23

Census of Manufactures - 22

Personally Identifiable Information - 22

Adjusted Gross Income - 22

Office of Management and Budget - 22

COVID-19 - 22

Federal Reserve System - 22

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Housing and Urban Development - 21

County Business Patterns - 21

Annual Business Survey - 20

Department of Homeland Security - 20

Department of Economics - 19

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 19

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 17

Special Sworn Status - 17

Unemployment Insurance - 17

Survey of Business Owners - 17

Accommodation and Food Services - 17

National Center for Health Statistics - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 16

Earned Income Tax Credit - 16

Cobb-Douglas - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Data Management System - 16

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 16

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 15

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Cornell University - 15

University of Maryland - 15

PSID - 15

Patent and Trademark Office - 15

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 15

Department of Labor - 14

1940 Census - 14

Technical Services - 14

International Trade Research Report - 14

Census Household Composition Key - 14

National Institute on Aging - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Indian Health Service - 13

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 12

Service Annual Survey - 12

General Accounting Office - 12

ASEC - 12

National Institutes of Health - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

Census Edited File - 11

Some Other Race - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 11

Board of Governors - 11

Postal Service - 11

University of Chicago - 11

Environmental Protection Agency - 11

Retail Trade - 11

American Economic Association - 11

Department of Education - 10

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 10

Harmonized System - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

AKM - 10

Arts, Entertainment - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Disability Insurance - 10

SSA Numident - 10

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 10

New York University - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

National Employer Survey - 9

United States Census Bureau - 9

MAFID - 9

World Trade Organization - 9

American Housing Survey - 9

University of Michigan - 9

Supreme Court - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Wholesale Trade - 9

Securities and Exchange Commission - 9

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 9

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

IQR - 8

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

Russell Sage Foundation - 8

Customs and Border Protection - 8

European Union - 8

Department of Agriculture - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Health Care and Social Assistance - 8

Energy Information Administration - 8

Sloan Foundation - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Pew Research Center - 8

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Occupational Employment Statistics - 7

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

Health and Retirement Study - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Stanford University - 7

Federal Register - 7

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 7

Educational Services - 7

Professional Services - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

Employment History File - 7

UC Berkeley - 7

Census Bureau Master Address File - 7

Business Formation Statistics - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Department of Justice - 7

Legal Form of Organization - 6

Yale University - 6

CPS ASEC - 6

IBM - 6

Initial Public Offering - 6

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 6

Urban Institute - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Department of Energy - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Company Organization Survey - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

Cell Mean Public Use - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Agriculture, Forestry - 5

Public Administration - 5

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Harvard University - 5

Boston College - 5

Administrative Records - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

PIKed - 5

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 5

George Mason University - 5

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 5

Retirement History Survey - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

LEHD Program - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

North American Free Trade Agreement - 4

Columbia University - 4

University of Toronto - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

IZA - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Department of Defense - 4

Net Present Value - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Limited Liability Company - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Princeton University - 4

2SLS - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPR - 4

European Commission - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

World Bank - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

United Nations - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Penn State University - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

CDF - 3

Cumulative Density Function - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Business Services - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

TFPQ - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Foreign Direct Investment - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

National Research Council - 3

John Voorheis - 21

Lucia Foster - 20

John Haltiwanger - 16

John M. Abowd - 14

Nathan Goldschlag - 12

J. David Brown - 11

Emin Dinlersoz - 10

Sonya R. Porter - 10

Fariha Kamal - 9

Catherine Buffington - 9

Moises Yi - 9

Jonathan Eggleston - 9

Lars Vilhuber - 8

Maggie R. Jones - 8

Kevin Rinz - 8

Zachary Kroff - 7

Cheryl Grim - 6

Zoltan Wolf - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Martha Stinson - 6

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Jonathan Colmer - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Kevin L. McKinney - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Ariel J. Binder - 5

Nikolas Zolas - 5

Thomas B. Foster - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Leah R. Clark - 5

Kendall Houghton - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

G. Jacob Blackwood - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Ryan Monarch - 4

Nicholas Bloom - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Erik Brynjolfsson - 4

Teresa C. Fort - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Charles Hokayem - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Amanda Eng - 4

Reed Walker - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 4

Leticia Fernandez - 4

Joseph Staudt - 4

Danielle H. Sandler - 4

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Kristin Sandusky - 3

Ethan Lewis - 3

Robert Ashmead - 3

Daniel Kifer - 3

Philip Leclerc - 3

Rolando A. Rodríguez - 3

Tamara Adams - 3

David Darais - 3

Sourya Dey - 3

Simson L. Garfinkel - 3

Scott Moore - 3

Ramy N. Tadros - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Steven J. Davis - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Peter Schott - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Richard Mansfield - 3

Ethan Krohn - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Emek Basker - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Adela Luque - 3

Carl Lieberman - 3

Garrett Anstreicher - 3

Gale Boyd - 3

Matthew Doolin - 3

James M. Noon - 3

James P. Ziliak - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

Sharon R. Ennis - 3

Matthew Staiger - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Sarah Miller - 3

Laura Wherry - 3

Javier Miranda - 3

Shawn Klimek - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

earnings - 59

employed - 59

labor - 58

employ - 57

workforce - 54

population - 52

survey - 51

recession - 49

respondent - 42

ethnicity - 40

market - 33

hispanic - 33

minority - 32

disparity - 32

manufacturing - 32

employee - 32

immigrant - 32

disadvantaged - 31

innovation - 31

payroll - 30

sector - 29

economist - 29

revenue - 28

growth - 26

census bureau - 26

entrepreneur - 26

earner - 26

poverty - 26

resident - 26

investment - 26

estimating - 25

racial - 25

economically - 25

disclosure - 25

industrial - 25

entrepreneurship - 24

ethnic - 24

company - 24

socioeconomic - 23

race - 23

export - 23

salary - 23

irs - 23

immigration - 23

statistical - 22

expenditure - 22

enterprise - 22

tax - 22

census data - 21

neighborhood - 21

macroeconomic - 21

patent - 21

gdp - 21

production - 21

econometric - 21

residence - 20

agency - 20

sale - 19

housing - 19

spillover - 19

welfare - 19

hiring - 19

trend - 18

venture - 18

finance - 18

heterogeneity - 18

worker - 18

unemployed - 18

data - 18

data census - 17

demand - 17

import - 17

financial - 17

migrant - 17

percentile - 16

enrollment - 16

report - 16

segregation - 16

rent - 16

incentive - 16

endogeneity - 16

1040 - 16

family - 15

entrepreneurial - 15

intergenerational - 15

citizen - 15

occupation - 14

residential - 14

technological - 14

loan - 14

relocation - 14

corporation - 14

quarterly - 14

eligibility - 13

investor - 13

exporter - 13

impact - 13

patenting - 13

discrimination - 13

microdata - 13

taxpayer - 13

inventory - 12

use census - 12

state - 12

rural - 12

funding - 12

job - 12

hire - 12

establishment - 12

datasets - 12

federal - 12

record - 12

graduate - 11

census responses - 11

wealth - 11

importer - 11

earn - 11

estimation - 11

manufacturer - 11

black - 11

researcher - 11

medicaid - 11

bias - 11

census employment - 10

parent - 10

proprietor - 10

innovate - 10

employment growth - 10

white - 10

migration - 10

imputation - 10

aggregate - 10

parental - 9

child - 9

coverage - 9

proprietorship - 9

assessed - 9

retirement - 9

home - 9

renter - 9

community - 9

pandemic - 9

metropolitan - 9

trading - 9

lender - 9

employment earnings - 9

financing - 9

household surveys - 9

monopolistic - 9

native - 9

urban - 9

migrate - 9

profit - 9

filing - 9

environmental - 9

emission - 9

census household - 9

mexican - 9

efficiency - 8

eligible - 8

enrolled - 8

incorporated - 8

census disclosure - 8

mortgage - 8

ssa - 8

labor markets - 8

prevalence - 8

acquisition - 8

poorer - 8

shipment - 8

multinational - 8

supplier - 8

imported - 8

borrower - 8

lending - 8

debt - 8

produce - 8

invention - 8

innovative - 8

productive - 8

productivity growth - 8

innovating - 8

organizational - 8

city - 8

migrating - 8

geographically - 8

dependent - 8

income data - 8

pollution - 8

commerce - 7

retailer - 7

wholesale - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

generation - 7

homeowner - 7

insurance - 7

latino - 7

segregated - 7

price - 7

consumption - 7

tariff - 7

exporting - 7

investing - 7

invest - 7

census survey - 7

subsidy - 7

startup - 7

relocate - 7

employment statistics - 7

mobility - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

stock - 7

bank - 7

exogeneity - 7

confidentiality - 7

woman - 7

saving - 7

regional - 7

adoption - 7

competitor - 7

workers earnings - 7

labor statistics - 6

regress - 6

maternal - 6

economic census - 6

mortality - 6

asian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

founder - 6

credit - 6

importing - 6

earnings employees - 6

equity - 6

fund - 6

2010 census - 6

prospect - 6

security - 6

technology - 6

growth productivity - 6

innovator - 6

employment estimates - 6

employment data - 6

workplace - 6

employment trends - 6

borrowing - 6

banking - 6

leverage - 6

provided census - 6

epa - 6

pollution exposure - 6

sectoral - 6

monopolistically - 6

pollutant - 6

policymakers - 6

birth - 6

analysis - 6

research - 6

accounting - 6

retail - 5

merchandise - 5

university - 5

degree - 5

decade - 5

education - 5

house - 5

indian - 5

benefit - 5

suburb - 5

international trade - 5

foreign - 5

firms export - 5

multinational firms - 5

creditor - 5

commodity - 5

exported - 5

risk - 5

sociology - 5

effects employment - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity shocks - 5

factory - 5

region - 5

opportunity - 5

unobserved - 5

longitudinal - 5

census records - 5

shift - 5

sampling - 5

survey households - 5

population survey - 5

geographic - 5

wage growth - 5

family income - 5

household income - 5

income households - 5

income children - 5

immigrant workers - 5

globalization - 5

public - 5

concentration - 5

exposure - 5

ownership - 5

linked census - 5

warehousing - 5

outsourced - 5

surveys censuses - 5

research census - 5

employing - 5

institutional - 5

gender - 5

unemployment rates - 5

medicare - 5

database - 5

externality - 5

study - 5

product - 5

industry concentration - 5

regressing - 5

estimator - 5

associate - 5

industry productivity - 5

regulation - 5

assimilation - 5

classified - 5

census research - 5

productivity measures - 5

reporting - 5

statistician - 5

grocery - 4

measures productivity - 4

views census - 4

residing - 4

career - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

educated - 4

schooling - 4

adulthood - 4

death - 4

disability - 4

country - 4

recessionary - 4

agriculture - 4

health - 4

residential segregation - 4

suburbanization - 4

technology adoption - 4

good - 4

spending - 4

consumer - 4

purchase - 4

subsidiary - 4

downstream - 4

trader - 4

sourcing - 4

disaster - 4

hurricane - 4

town - 4

effect wages - 4

wage gap - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms patents - 4

patents firms - 4

factor productivity - 4

depreciation - 4

business startups - 4

area - 4

layoff - 4

developed - 4

patented - 4

employment dynamics - 4

worker demographics - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

employment distribution - 4

moving - 4

specialization - 4

shareholder - 4

bankruptcy - 4

borrow - 4

income individuals - 4

immigrated - 4

custom - 4

privacy - 4

publicly - 4

industry wages - 4

endogenous - 4

census linked - 4

labor productivity - 4

survey income - 4

tenure - 4

electricity - 4

energy - 4

earnings age - 4

employment wages - 4

taxation - 4

matching - 4

recession exposure - 4

subsidized - 4

cost - 4

indicator - 4

policy - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

renewable - 4

union - 4

fertility - 4

aggregate productivity - 4

earnings workers - 4

employment measures - 4

censuses surveys - 4

dispersion productivity - 3

warehouse - 3

productivity variation - 3

program census - 3

mother - 3

preschool - 3

college - 3

cohort - 3

midwest - 3

urbanized - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

export market - 3

affluent - 3

wage earnings - 3

crime - 3

asset - 3

firm patenting - 3

productivity dynamics - 3

wage effects - 3

patenting firms - 3

work census - 3

turnover - 3

collateral - 3

aging - 3

younger firms - 3

wages employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms young - 3

autoregressive - 3

growth employment - 3

shock - 3

information - 3

relocating - 3

firms import - 3

expense - 3

restaurant - 3

apartment - 3

location - 3

outsourcing - 3

exogenous - 3

income survey - 3

neighbor - 3

records census - 3

race census - 3

fuel - 3

corporate - 3

larger firms - 3

interracial - 3

employment effects - 3

impact employment - 3

parents income - 3

earnings growth - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

volatility - 3

ancestry - 3

executive - 3

firms grow - 3

poor - 3

average - 3

industry variation - 3

assessing - 3

network - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

geography - 3

oligopolistic - 3

regulatory - 3

customer - 3

utility - 3

merger - 3

enforcement - 3

locality - 3

wage data - 3

polluting - 3

econometrician - 3

fiscal - 3

earnings inequality - 3

pregnancy - 3

mandate - 3

tech - 3

business data - 3

employer household - 3

employment count - 3

measures employment - 3

workforce indicators - 3

employed census - 3

statistical agencies - 3

Viewing papers 281 through 290 of 292


  • Working Paper

    Disclosure Limitation and Confidentiality Protection in Linked Data

    January 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-07

    Confidentiality protection for linked administrative data is a combination of access modalities and statistical disclosure limitation. We review traditional statistical disclosure limitation methods and newer methods based on synthetic data, input noise infusion and formal privacy. We discuss how these methods are integrated with access modalities by providing three detailed examples. The first example is the linkages in the Health and Retirement Study to Social Security Administration data. The second example is the linkage of the Survey of Income and Program Participation to administrative data from the Internal Revenue Service and the Social Security Administration. The third example is the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics data, which links state unemployment insurance records for workers and firms to a wide variety of censuses and surveys at the U.S. Census Bureau. For examples, we discuss access modalities, disclosure limitation methods, the effectiveness of those methods, and the resulting analytical validity. The final sections discuss recent advances in access modalities for linked administrative data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Upstream, Downstream: Diffusion and Impacts of the Universal Product Code

    January 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-17-66R

    We study the adoption, diffusion, and impacts of the Universal Product Code (UPC) between 1975 and 1992, during the initial years of the barcode system. We find evidence of network effects in the diffusion process. Matched-sample difference-in-difference estimates show that firm size and trademark registrations increase following UPC adoption by manufacturers. Industry-level import penetration also increases with domestic UPC adoption. Our findings suggest that barcodes, scanning, and related technologies helped stimulate variety-enhancing product innovation and encourage the growth of international retail supply chains.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring Cross-Country Differences in Misallocation

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-50R

    We describe differences between the commonly used version of the U.S. Census of Manufactures available at the RDCs and what establishments themselves report. The originally reported data has substantially more dispersion in measured establishment productivity. Measured allocative efficiency is substantially higher in the cleaned data than the raw data: 4x higher in 2002, 20x in 2007, and 80x in 2012. Many of the important editing strategies at the Census, including industry analysts' manual edits and edits using tax records, are infeasible in non-U.S. datasets. We describe a new Bayesian approach for editing and imputation that can be used across contexts.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    IMPROVING THE SYNTHETIC LONGITUDINAL BUSINESS DATABASE

    February 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-12

    In most countries, national statistical agencies do not release establishment-level business microdata, because doing so represents too large a risk to establishments' confidentiality. Agencies potentially can manage these risks by releasing synthetic microdata, i.e., individual establishment records simulated from statistical models de- signed to mimic the joint distribution of the underlying observed data. Previously, we used this approach to generate a public-use version'now available for public use'of the U. S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Business Database (LBD), a longitudinal cen- sus of establishments dating back to 1976. While the synthetic LBD has proven to be a useful product, we now seek to improve and expand it by using new synthesis models and adding features. This article describes our efforts to create the second generation of the SynLBD, including synthesis procedures that we believe could be replicated in other contexts.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LOOKING BACK ON THREE YEARS OF USING THE SYNTHETIC LBD BETA

    February 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-11

    Distributions of business data are typically much more skewed than those for household or individual data and public knowledge of the underlying units is greater. As a results, national statistical offices (NSOs) rarely release establishment or firm-level business microdata due to the risk to respondent confidentiality. One potential approach for overcoming these risks is to release synthetic data where the establishment data are simulated from statistical models designed to mimic the distributions of the real underlying microdata. The US Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies in collaboration with Duke University, the National Institute of Statistical Sciences, and Cornell University made available a synthetic public use file for the Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) comprising more than 20 million records for all business establishment with paid employees dating back to 1976. The resulting product, dubbed the SynLBD, was released in 2010 and is the first-ever comprehensive business microdata set publicly released in the United States including data on establishments employment and payroll, birth and death years, and industrial classification. This pa- per documents the scope of projects that have requested and used the SynLBD.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    WHY IMMIGRANTS LEAVE NEW DESTINATIONS AND WHERE DO THEY GO?

    June 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-32

    Immigrants have a markedly higher likelihood of migrating internally if they live in new estinations. This paper looks at why that pattern occurs and at how immigrants' out-migration to new versus traditional destinations responds to their labor market economic and industrial structure, nativity origins and concentration, geographic region, and 1995 labor market type. Confidential data from the 2000 and 1990 decennial censuses are used for the analysis. Metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas are categorized into 741 local labor markets and classified as new or traditional based on their nativity concentrations of immigrants from the largest Asian, Caribbean and Latin American origins. The analysis showed that immigrants were less likely to migrate to new destinations if they lived in areas of higher nativity concentration, foreign-born population growth, and wages but more likely to make that move if they were professionals, agricultural or blue collar workers, highly educated, fluent in English, and lived in other new destinations. While most immigrants are more likely to migrate to new rather than traditional destinations that outcome differs sharply for immigrants from different origins and for some immigrants, particularly those from the Caribbean, the dispersal process to new destinations has barely started.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Dynamically Consistent Noise Infusion and Partially Synthetic Data as Confidentiality Protection Measures for Related Time Series

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-13

    The Census Bureau's Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment measures such as worker and job flows, tabulated by worker characteristics in various combinations. The data are released for several levels of NAICS industries and geography, the lowest aggregation of the latter being counties. Disclosure avoidance methods are required to protect the information about individuals and businesses that contribute to the underlying data. The QWI disclosure avoidance mechanism we describe here relies heavily on the use of noise infusion through a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor, used for magnitudes, counts, differences and ratios. There is minimal suppression and no complementary suppressions. To our knowledge, the release in 2003 of the QWI was the first large-scale use of noise infusion in any official statistical product. We show that the released statistics are analytically valid along several critical dimensions { measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. We provide an analysis of the degree to which confidentiality is protected. Furthermore, we show how the judicious use of synthetic data, injected into the tabulation process, can completely eliminate suppressions, maintain analytical validity, and increase the protection of the underlying confidential data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Resolving the Tension Between Access and Confidentiality: Past Experience and Future Plans at the U.S. Census Bureau

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-33

    This paper provides an historical context for access to U.S. Federal statistical data with a primary focus on the U.S. Census Bureau. We review the various modes used by the Census Bureau to make data available to users, and highlight the costs and benefits associated with each. We highlight some of the specific improvements underway or under consideration at the Census Bureau to better serve its data users, as well as discuss the broad strategies employed by statistical agencies to respond to the challenges of data access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Discretionary Disclosure in Financial Reporting: An Examination Comparing Internal Firm Data to Externally Reported Segment Data

    September 2009

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-09-28

    We use confidential, U.S. Census Bureau, plant-level data to investigate aggregation in external reporting. We compare firms' plant-level data to their published segment reports, conducting our tests by grouping a firm's plants that share the same four-digit SIC code into a 'pseudo-segment.' We then determine whether that pseudo-segment is disclosed as an external segment, or whether it is subsumed into a different business unit for external reporting purposes. We find pseudo-segments are more likely to be aggregated within a line-of-business segment when the agency and proprietary costs of separately reporting the pseudo-segment are higher and when firm and pseudo-segment characteristics allow for more discretion in the application of segment reporting rules. For firms reporting multiple external segments, aggregation of pseudo-segments is driven by both agency and proprietary costs. However, for firms reporting a single external segment, we find no evidence of an agency cost motive for aggregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Consistent Cell Means for Topcoded Incomes in the Public Use March CPS (1976-2007)

    March 2008

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-08-06

    Using the internal March CPS, we create and in this paper distribute to the larger research community a cell mean series that provides the mean of all income values above the topcode for any income source of any individual in the public use March CPS that has been topcoded since 1976. We also describe our construction of this series. When we use this series together with the public use March CPS, we closely match the yearly mean income levels and income inequalities of the U.S. population found using the internal March CPS data.
    View Full Paper PDF