CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

American Community Survey - 138

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 134

Disclosure Review Board - 129

North American Industry Classification System - 125

Internal Revenue Service - 118

Longitudinal Business Database - 117

Protected Identification Key - 90

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 81

Social Security Administration - 78

Current Population Survey - 78

Center for Economic Studies - 71

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 68

National Science Foundation - 65

Social Security Number - 63

Employer Identification Numbers - 60

Ordinary Least Squares - 60

Decennial Census - 59

Social Security - 53

National Bureau of Economic Research - 47

Business Register - 44

W-2 - 43

Person Validation System - 42

Federal Reserve Bank - 38

Economic Census - 37

Business Dynamics Statistics - 34

Census Bureau Business Register - 33

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 33

2010 Census - 33

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 29

Total Factor Productivity - 28

Census Numident - 28

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 27

Standard Industrial Classification - 26

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 26

Federal Reserve System - 25

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 25

Person Identification Validation System - 25

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 24

Adjusted Gross Income - 24

Master Address File - 24

Census of Manufactures - 24

Office of Management and Budget - 23

County Business Patterns - 22

Personally Identifiable Information - 22

COVID-19 - 22

Department of Homeland Security - 21

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 21

Housing and Urban Development - 21

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 20

Department of Economics - 20

Annual Business Survey - 20

Patent and Trademark Office - 18

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 18

Unemployment Insurance - 18

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 18

Survey of Business Owners - 18

Accommodation and Food Services - 18

Special Sworn Status - 18

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 18

Research Data Center - 18

Cobb-Douglas - 17

Technical Services - 16

National Center for Health Statistics - 16

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 16

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 16

Earned Income Tax Credit - 16

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 16

Data Management System - 16

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 15

Individual Characteristics File - 15

Cornell University - 15

University of Maryland - 15

PSID - 15

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 15

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 14

Department of Labor - 14

1940 Census - 14

International Trade Research Report - 14

Census Household Composition Key - 14

Board of Governors - 13

National Institutes of Health - 13

Service Annual Survey - 13

National Institute on Aging - 13

Indian Health Service - 13

Environmental Protection Agency - 12

University of Chicago - 12

Department of Education - 12

Retail Trade - 12

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 12

General Accounting Office - 12

ASEC - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

American Economic Association - 12

SSA Numident - 11

Arts, Entertainment - 11

Census Edited File - 11

Some Other Race - 11

Detailed Earnings Records - 11

Postal Service - 11

World Trade Organization - 10

Supreme Court - 10

Wholesale Trade - 10

Securities and Exchange Commission - 10

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 10

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 10

Harmonized System - 10

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 10

AKM - 10

Generalized Method of Moments - 10

Disability Insurance - 10

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 10

New York University - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

Department of Agriculture - 9

European Union - 9

Energy Information Administration - 9

IQR - 9

Stanford University - 9

Health and Retirement Study - 9

National Employer Survey - 9

United States Census Bureau - 9

MAFID - 9

American Housing Survey - 9

University of Michigan - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 9

MAF-ARF - 9

Core Based Statistical Area - 9

UC Berkeley - 8

Census Bureau Master Address File - 8

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Educational Services - 8

Social and Economic Supplement - 8

COVID - 8

Russell Sage Foundation - 8

Customs and Border Protection - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Health Care and Social Assistance - 8

Sloan Foundation - 8

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 8

Master Beneficiary Record - 8

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Pew Research Center - 8

Business Formation Statistics - 8

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 7

National Income and Product Accounts - 7

Department of Energy - 7

Employer Characteristics File - 7

Oil and Gas Extraction - 7

Initial Public Offering - 7

Company Organization Survey - 7

Standard Occupational Classification - 7

Occupational Employment Statistics - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

NUMIDENT - 7

Federal Register - 7

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 7

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 7

Professional Services - 7

Medicaid Services - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

Employment History File - 7

Statistics Canada - 7

Department of Justice - 7

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 6

National Academy of Sciences - 6

Survey of Consumer Finances - 6

Public Administration - 6

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 6

Research and Development - 6

Legal Form of Organization - 6

Yale University - 6

CPS ASEC - 6

IBM - 6

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Urban Institute - 6

Centers for Medicare - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Economic Literature - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Retirement History Survey - 6

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 6

National Opinion Research Center - 5

Department of Defense - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 5

MTO - 5

Opportunity Atlas - 5

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 5

National Establishment Time Series - 5

Agriculture, Forestry - 5

Federal Poverty Level - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Economic Research Service - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

Harvard University - 5

Boston College - 5

Administrative Records - 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 5

PIKed - 5

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 5

George Mason University - 5

Public Use Micro Sample - 5

LEHD Program - 5

North American Industry Classi - 5

Center for Research in Security Prices - 4

National Research Council - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Office of Personnel Management - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Minnesota Population Center - 4

North American Free Trade Agreement - 4

Columbia University - 4

United Nations - 4

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation - 4

University of Toronto - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

IZA - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Net Present Value - 4

International Trade Commission - 4

Limited Liability Company - 4

Regression Discontinuity Design - 4

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Princeton University - 4

2SLS - 4

State Energy Data System - 4

TFPR - 4

European Commission - 4

World Bank - 4

Kauffman Foundation - 4

University of California - 3

Employer-Household Dynamics - 3

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 3

Census of Services - 3

University of Texas - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

Longitudinal Research Database - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

Penn State University - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

CDF - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

American Economic Review - 3

Composite Person Record - 3

Business Services - 3

Bureau of Labor - 3

Department of Commerce - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

TFPQ - 3

Linear Probability Models - 3

Current Employment Statistics - 3

Federal Trade Commission - 3

Georgetown University - 3

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Local Employment Dynamics - 3

Foreign Direct Investment - 3

COMPUSTAT - 3

University of Minnesota - 3

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Guzman and Stern - 3

John Voorheis - 22

Lucia Foster - 20

John Haltiwanger - 17

John M. Abowd - 14

Nathan Goldschlag - 12

Emin Dinlersoz - 11

J. David Brown - 11

Fariha Kamal - 10

Jonathan Eggleston - 10

Sonya R. Porter - 10

Catherine Buffington - 9

Moises Yi - 9

Lars Vilhuber - 8

Maggie R. Jones - 8

Kevin Rinz - 8

Leah R. Clark - 7

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 7

Zachary Kroff - 7

Cheryl Grim - 6

Zoltan Wolf - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Martha Stinson - 6

Randall Akee - 6

Jonathan Colmer - 6

Lawrence Warren - 6

Kevin L. McKinney - 6

Misty L. Heggeness - 6

Joseph Staudt - 5

Ariel J. Binder - 5

Nikolas Zolas - 5

Thomas B. Foster - 5

Renuka Bhaskar - 5

Kendall Houghton - 5

Marta Murray-Close - 5

Emek Basker - 4

G. Jacob Blackwood - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Ryan Monarch - 4

Nicholas Bloom - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Erik Brynjolfsson - 4

Teresa C. Fort - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Charles Hokayem - 4

Eva Lyubich - 4

Amanda Eng - 4

Reed Walker - 4

Gloria G. Aldana - 4

Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej - 4

Leticia Fernandez - 4

Danielle H. Sandler - 4

Andrew Penner - 3

Michelle Spiegel - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Kristin Sandusky - 3

Ethan Lewis - 3

Robert Ashmead - 3

Daniel Kifer - 3

Philip Leclerc - 3

Rolando A. Rodríguez - 3

Tamara Adams - 3

David Darais - 3

Sourya Dey - 3

Simson L. Garfinkel - 3

Scott Moore - 3

Ramy N. Tadros - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Steven J. Davis - 3

Emilia Simeonova - 3

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Peter Schott - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Richard Mansfield - 3

Ethan Krohn - 3

Mary Munro - 3

Jennifer Withrow - 3

Suvy Qin - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Adela Luque - 3

Carl Lieberman - 3

Garrett Anstreicher - 3

Gale Boyd - 3

Matthew Doolin - 3

James M. Noon - 3

James P. Ziliak - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

Sharon R. Ennis - 3

Matthew Staiger - 3

J. Daniel Kim - 3

Sarah Miller - 3

Laura Wherry - 3

Javier Miranda - 3

Shawn Klimek - 3

Victoria Udalova - 3

earnings - 61

employed - 60

employ - 58

labor - 58

population - 57

workforce - 56

survey - 53

recession - 49

respondent - 44

ethnicity - 42

market - 35

hispanic - 35

disparity - 34

innovation - 33

manufacturing - 33

employee - 33

revenue - 32

minority - 32

immigrant - 32

economist - 31

disadvantaged - 31

census bureau - 30

sector - 30

payroll - 30

growth - 28

investment - 28

entrepreneur - 28

poverty - 27

earner - 27

industrial - 26

economically - 26

socioeconomic - 26

ethnic - 26

entrepreneurship - 26

estimating - 26

company - 26

disclosure - 26

resident - 26

statistical - 25

racial - 25

macroeconomic - 24

export - 24

irs - 24

salary - 24

expenditure - 24

immigration - 24

patent - 23

gdp - 23

census data - 23

enterprise - 23

race - 23

sale - 22

production - 22

tax - 22

hiring - 21

neighborhood - 21

econometric - 21

venture - 20

trend - 20

residence - 20

agency - 20

worker - 19

demand - 19

housing - 19

spillover - 19

welfare - 19

import - 18

financial - 18

percentile - 18

data census - 18

finance - 18

heterogeneity - 18

unemployed - 18

data - 18

1040 - 17

report - 17

enrollment - 17

migrant - 17

quarterly - 16

intergenerational - 16

entrepreneurial - 16

segregation - 16

rent - 16

incentive - 16

endogeneity - 16

technological - 15

inventory - 15

patenting - 15

occupation - 15

relocation - 15

loan - 15

use census - 15

eligibility - 15

corporation - 15

family - 15

citizen - 15

exporter - 14

impact - 14

state - 14

residential - 14

job - 13

earn - 13

record - 13

investor - 13

discrimination - 13

microdata - 13

taxpayer - 13

wealth - 12

graduate - 12

proprietor - 12

rural - 12

funding - 12

hire - 12

establishment - 12

datasets - 12

federal - 12

innovate - 11

migration - 11

aggregate - 11

imputation - 11

census responses - 11

importer - 11

estimation - 11

manufacturer - 11

black - 11

researcher - 11

medicaid - 11

bias - 11

trading - 10

monopolistic - 10

acquisition - 10

prevalence - 10

enrolled - 10

retirement - 10

incorporated - 10

census employment - 10

parent - 10

employment growth - 10

white - 10

shipment - 9

innovative - 9

invention - 9

innovating - 9

bank - 9

debt - 9

eligible - 9

census disclosure - 9

income data - 9

productivity growth - 9

efficiency - 9

parental - 9

child - 9

coverage - 9

proprietorship - 9

assessed - 9

home - 9

renter - 9

community - 9

pandemic - 9

metropolitan - 9

lender - 9

employment earnings - 9

financing - 9

household surveys - 9

organizational - 9

native - 9

urban - 9

migrate - 9

profit - 9

geographically - 9

filing - 9

environmental - 9

emission - 9

census household - 9

mexican - 9

exporting - 8

exogeneity - 8

relocate - 8

adoption - 8

commerce - 8

mortgage - 8

ssa - 8

labor markets - 8

poorer - 8

multinational - 8

supplier - 8

imported - 8

borrower - 8

lending - 8

stock - 8

produce - 8

productive - 8

startup - 8

city - 8

migrating - 8

dependent - 8

pollution - 8

technology - 7

regress - 7

accounting - 7

borrowing - 7

equity - 7

fund - 7

analysis - 7

study - 7

mortality - 7

economic census - 7

retailer - 7

wholesale - 7

productivity dispersion - 7

generation - 7

homeowner - 7

insurance - 7

latino - 7

segregated - 7

price - 7

consumption - 7

tariff - 7

investing - 7

invest - 7

census survey - 7

subsidy - 7

employment statistics - 7

mobility - 7

reside - 7

citizenship - 7

banking - 7

confidentiality - 7

woman - 7

saving - 7

regional - 7

competitor - 7

workers earnings - 7

product - 6

exported - 6

shift - 6

unemployment rates - 6

creditor - 6

family income - 6

parents income - 6

sampling - 6

university - 6

opportunity - 6

associate - 6

institutional - 6

productivity measures - 6

warehousing - 6

database - 6

labor statistics - 6

maternal - 6

asian - 6

propensity - 6

rurality - 6

founder - 6

credit - 6

importing - 6

earnings employees - 6

2010 census - 6

prospect - 6

security - 6

growth productivity - 6

innovator - 6

employment estimates - 6

employment data - 6

workplace - 6

employment trends - 6

leverage - 6

provided census - 6

epa - 6

pollution exposure - 6

sectoral - 6

monopolistically - 6

pollutant - 6

policymakers - 6

birth - 6

research - 6

custom - 5

trader - 5

merger - 5

specialization - 5

patented - 5

layoff - 5

borrow - 5

disability - 5

income white - 5

average - 5

wage gap - 5

educated - 5

measures productivity - 5

aggregate productivity - 5

spending - 5

subsidiary - 5

retail - 5

merchandise - 5

degree - 5

nonemployer businesses - 5

decade - 5

education - 5

house - 5

indian - 5

benefit - 5

applicant - 5

suburb - 5

international trade - 5

foreign - 5

firms export - 5

multinational firms - 5

commodity - 5

risk - 5

sociology - 5

effects employment - 5

productivity estimates - 5

productivity shocks - 5

factory - 5

business startups - 5

region - 5

unobserved - 5

longitudinal - 5

census records - 5

survey households - 5

population survey - 5

geographic - 5

wage growth - 5

household income - 5

income households - 5

income children - 5

immigrant workers - 5

globalization - 5

public - 5

concentration - 5

exposure - 5

ownership - 5

linked census - 5

outsourced - 5

surveys censuses - 5

research census - 5

employing - 5

gender - 5

medicare - 5

externality - 5

industry concentration - 5

regressing - 5

estimator - 5

industry productivity - 5

regulation - 5

assimilation - 5

classified - 5

census research - 5

reporting - 5

statistician - 5

regulatory - 4

crime - 4

tech - 4

advancement - 4

innovation patenting - 4

fuel - 4

asset - 4

paper census - 4

assessing - 4

college - 4

earnings gap - 4

information census - 4

fiscal - 4

customer - 4

executive - 4

corporate - 4

grocery - 4

sector productivity - 4

residing - 4

career - 4

postsecondary - 4

schooling - 4

adulthood - 4

death - 4

country - 4

recessionary - 4

agriculture - 4

health - 4

residential segregation - 4

suburbanization - 4

technology adoption - 4

good - 4

consumer - 4

purchase - 4

downstream - 4

sourcing - 4

disaster - 4

hurricane - 4

town - 4

effect wages - 4

census 2020 - 4

firms patents - 4

patents firms - 4

factor productivity - 4

depreciation - 4

area - 4

developed - 4

employment dynamics - 4

worker demographics - 4

longitudinal employer - 4

employment distribution - 4

moving - 4

shareholder - 4

bankruptcy - 4

income individuals - 4

immigrated - 4

privacy - 4

publicly - 4

industry wages - 4

endogenous - 4

census linked - 4

labor productivity - 4

survey income - 4

tenure - 4

electricity - 4

energy - 4

earnings age - 4

employment wages - 4

taxation - 4

matching - 4

recession exposure - 4

subsidized - 4

cost - 4

indicator - 4

policy - 4

immigrant entrepreneurs - 4

renewable - 4

union - 4

fertility - 4

earnings workers - 4

employment measures - 4

censuses surveys - 4

earnings mobility - 4

pension - 3

estimates intergenerational - 3

grandparent - 3

budget - 3

rate - 3

sample - 3

earns - 3

consolidated - 3

department - 3

identifier - 3

dispersion productivity - 3

warehouse - 3

productivity variation - 3

mother - 3

preschool - 3

cohort - 3

outcome - 3

midwest - 3

urbanized - 3

exporters multinationals - 3

export market - 3

affluent - 3

wage earnings - 3

firm patenting - 3

productivity dynamics - 3

wage effects - 3

patenting firms - 3

work census - 3

turnover - 3

collateral - 3

aging - 3

younger firms - 3

wages employment - 3

firms age - 3

firms young - 3

autoregressive - 3

growth employment - 3

shock - 3

information - 3

relocating - 3

firms import - 3

expense - 3

taxable - 3

restaurant - 3

apartment - 3

location - 3

outsourcing - 3

exogenous - 3

entry productivity - 3

income survey - 3

neighbor - 3

records census - 3

race census - 3

larger firms - 3

interracial - 3

employment effects - 3

impact employment - 3

earnings growth - 3

income neighborhoods - 3

volatility - 3

ancestry - 3

firms grow - 3

poor - 3

industry variation - 3

network - 3

reallocation productivity - 3

geography - 3

oligopolistic - 3

utility - 3

enforcement - 3

locality - 3

wage data - 3

polluting - 3

econometrician - 3

earnings inequality - 3

pregnancy - 3

mandate - 3

individuals census - 3

business data - 3

employer household - 3

employment count - 3

measures employment - 3

workforce indicators - 3

employed census - 3

statistical agencies - 3

Viewing papers 281 through 290 of 306


  • Working Paper

    Who Gains from Creative Destruction? Evidence from High-Quality Entrepreneurship in the United States

    October 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-29

    The question of who gains from high-quality entrepreneurship is crucial to understanding whether investments in incubating potentially innovative start-up firms will produce socially beneficial outcomes. We attempt to bring new evidence to this question by combining new aggregate measures of local area income inequality and income mobility with measures of entrepreneurship from Guzman and Stern (2017). Our new aggregate measures are generated by linking American Community Survey data with the universe of IRS 1040 tax returns. In both fixed effects and IV models using a Bartik-style instrument, we find that entrepreneurship increases income inequality. Further, we find that this increase in income inequality arises due to the fact that almost all of the individual gains associated with increased entrepreneurship accrue to the top 10 percent of the income distribution. While we find mixed evidence for small positive effects of entrepreneurship lower on the income distribution, we find little if any evidence that entrepreneurship increases income mobility.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Task-based Approach to Constructing Occupational Categories with Implications for Empirical Research in Labor Economics

    September 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-27

    Most applied research in labor economics that examines returns to worker skills or differences in earnings across subgroups of workers typically accounts for the role of occupations by controlling for occupational categories. Researchers often aggregate detailed occupations into categories based on the Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) coding scheme, which is based largely on narratives or qualitative measures of workers' tasks. Alternatively, we propose two quantitative task-based approaches to constructing occupational categories by using factor analysis with O*NET job descriptors that provide a rich set of continuous measures of job tasks across all occupations. We find that our task-based approach outperforms the SOC-based approach in terms of lower occupation distance measures. We show that our task-based approach provides an intuitive, nuanced interpretation for grouping occupations and permits quantitative assessments of similarities in task compositions across occupations. We also replicate a recent analysis and find that our task-based occupational categories explain more of the gender wage gap than the SOC-based approaches explain. Our study enhances the Federal Statistical System's understanding of the SOC codes, investigates ways to use third-party data to construct useful research variables that can potentially be added to Census Bureau data products to improve their quality and versatility, and sheds light on how the use of alternative occupational categories in economics research may lead to different empirical results and deeper understanding in the analysis of labor market outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Did Timing Matter? Life Cycle Differences in Effects of Exposure to the Great Recession

    September 2019

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-25

    Exposure to a recession can have persistent, negative consequences, but does the severity of those consequences depend on when in the life cycle a person is exposed? I estimate the effects of exposure to the Great Recession on employment and earnings outcomes for groups defined by year of birth over the ten years following the beginning of the recession. With the exception of the oldest workers, all groups experience reductions in earnings and employment due to local unemployment rate shocks during the recession. Younger workers experience the largest earnings losses in percent terms (up to 13 percent), in part because recession exposure makes them persistently less likely to work for high-paying employers even as their overall employment recovers more quickly than older workers'. Younger workers also experience reductions in earnings and employment due to changes in local labor market structure associated with the recession. These effects are substantially smaller in magnitude but more persistent than the effects of unemployment rate increases.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Automating Response Evaluation For Franchising Questions On The 2017 Economic Census

    July 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-20

    Between the 2007 and 2012 Economic Censuses (EC), the count of franchise-affiliated establishments declined by 9.8%. One reason for this decline was a reduction in resources that the Census Bureau was able to dedicate to the manual evaluation of survey responses in the franchise section of the EC. Extensive manual evaluation in 2007 resulted in many establishments, whose survey forms indicated they were not franchise-affiliated, being recoded as franchise-affiliated. No such evaluation could be undertaken in 2012. In this paper, we examine the potential of using external data harvested from the web in combination with machine learning methods to automate the process of evaluating responses to the franchise section of the 2017 EC. Our method allows us to quickly and accurately identify and recode establishments have been mistakenly classified as not being franchise-affiliated, increasing the unweighted number of franchise-affiliated establishments in the 2017 EC by 22%-42%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Predicting the Effect of Adding a Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census

    June 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-18

    The addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census could affect the self-response rate, a key driver of the cost and quality of a census. We find that citizenship question response patterns in the American Community Survey (ACS) suggest that it is a sensitive question when asked about administrative record noncitizens but not when asked about administrative record citizens. ACS respondents who were administrative record noncitizens in 2017 frequently choose to skip the question or answer that the person is a citizen. We predict the effect on self-response to the entire survey by comparing mail response rates in the 2010 ACS, which included a citizenship question, with those of the 2010 census, which did not have a citizenship question, among households in both surveys. We compare the actual ACS-census difference in response rates for households that may contain noncitizens (more sensitive to the question) with the difference for households containing only U.S. citizens. We estimate that the addition of a citizenship question will have an 8.0 percentage point larger effect on self-response rates in households that may have noncitizens relative to those with only U.S. citizens. Assuming that the citizenship question does not affect unit self-response in all-citizen households and applying the 8.0 percentage point drop to the 28.1 % of housing units potentially having at least one noncitizen would predict an overall 2.2 percentage point drop in self-response in the 2020 census, increasing costs and reducing the quality of the population count.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Foreign vs. U.S. Graduate Degrees: The Impact on Earnings Assimilation and Return Migration for the Foreign Born

    June 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-17

    Using a novel panel data set of recent immigrants to the U.S., we identify return migration rates and earnings trajectories of two immigrant groups: those with foreign graduate degrees and those with a U.S. graduate degree. We focus on immigrants (of both genders) to the U.S. who arrive in the same entry cohort and from the same country of birth over the period 2005-2015. In Census-IRS administrative data, we find that downward earnings trajectories are predictive of return migration for immigrants with degrees acquired abroad. Meanwhile, immigrants with U.S.-acquired graduate degrees experience mainly upward earnings mobility.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Antipoverty Impact of the EITC: New Estimates from Survey and Administrative Tax Records

    April 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-14R

    We reassess the antipoverty effects of the EITC using unique data linking the CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplement to IRS data for the same individuals spanning years 2005-2016. We compare EITC benefits from standard simulators to administrative EITC payments and find that significantly more actual EITC payments flow to childless tax units than predicted, and to those whose family income places them above official poverty thresholds. However, actual EITC payments appear to be target efficient at the tax unit level. In 2016, about 3.1 million persons were lifted out of poverty by the EITC, substantially less than prior estimates.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Immigrants' Earnings Growth and Return Migration from the U.S.: Examining their Determinants using Linked Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-10

    Using a novel panel data set of recent immigrants to the U.S. (2005-2007) from individual-level linked U.S. Census Bureau survey data and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administrative records, we identify the determinants of return migration and earnings growth for this immigrant arrival cohort. We show that by 10 years after arrival almost 40 percent have return migrated. Our analysis examines these flows by educational attainment, country of birth, and English language ability separately for each gender. We show, for the first time, that return migrants experience downward earnings mobility over two to three years prior to their return migration. This finding suggests that economic shocks are closely related to emigration decisions; time-variant unobserved characteristics may be more important in determining out-migration than previously known. We also show that wage assimilation with native-born populations occurs fairly quickly; after 10 years there is strong convergence in earnings by several characteristics. Finally, we confirm that the use of stock-based panel data lead to estimates of slower earnings growth than is found using repeated cross-section data. However, we also show, using selection-correction methods in our panel data, that stock-based panel data may understate the rate of earnings growth for the initial immigrant arrival cohort when emigration is not accounted for.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics (NES-D): Using Administrative and Census Records Data in Business Statistics

    January 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-01

    The quinquennial Survey of Business Owners or SBO provided the only comprehensive source of information in the United States on employer and nonemployer businesses by the sex, race, ethnicity and veteran status of the business owners. The annual Nonemployer Statistics series (NES) provides establishment counts and receipts for nonemployers but contains no demographic information on the business owners. With the transition of the employer component of the SBO to the Annual Business Survey, the Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics series or NES-D represents the continuation of demographics estimates for nonemployer businesses. NES-D will leverage existing administrative and census records to assign demographic characteristics to the universe of approximately 24 million nonemployer businesses (as of 2015). Demographic characteristics include key demographics measured by the SBO (sex, race, Hispanic origin and veteran status) as well as other demographics (age, place of birth and citizenship status) collected but not imputed by the SBO if missing. A spectrum of administrative and census data sources will provide the nonemployer universe and demographics information. Specifically, the nonemployer universe originates in the Business Register; the Census Numident will provide sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status; race and Hispanic origin information will be obtained from multiple years of the decennial census and the American Community Survey; and the Department of Veteran Affairs will provide administrative records data on veteran status. The use of blended data in this manner will make possible the production of NES-D, an annual series that will become the only source of detailed and comprehensive statistics on the scope, nature and activities of U.S. businesses with no paid employment by the demographic characteristics of the business owner. Using the 2015 vintage of nonemployers, initial results indicate that demographic information is available for the overwhelming majority of the universe of nonemployers. For instance, information on sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status is available for over 95 percent of the 24 million nonemployers while race and Hispanic origin are available for about 90 percent of them. These results exclude owners of C-corporations, which represent only 2 percent of nonemployer firms. Among other things, future work will entail imputation of missing demographics information (including that of C-corporations), testing the longitudinal consistency of the estimates, and expanding the set of characteristics beyond the demographics mentioned above. Without added respondent burden and at lower imputation rates and costs, NES-D will meet the needs of stakeholders as well as the economy as a whole by providing reliable estimates at a higher frequency (annual vs. every 5 years) and with a more timely dissemination schedule than the SBO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Factors that Influence Change in Hispanic Identification: Evidence from Linked Decennial Census and American Community Survey Data

    October 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-45

    This study explores patterns of ethnic boundary crossing as evidenced by changes in Hispanic origin responses across decennial census and survey data. We identify socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic factors associated with Hispanic response change. In addition, we assess whether changes in the Hispanic origin question between the 2000 and 2010 censuses influenced changes in Hispanic reporting. We use a unique large dataset that links a person's unedited responses to the Hispanic origin question across Census 2000, the 2010 Census and the 2006-2010 American Community Survey five-year file. We find that most of the individuals in the sample identified consistently as Hispanic regardless of changes in the wording of the Hispanic origin question. Individuals who changed in or out of a Hispanic identification, as well as those who consistently identified as non-Hispanic (of Hispanic ancestry), differed in socioeconomic and cultural characteristics from individuals who consistently reported as Hispanic. The likelihood of changing their Hispanic origin response is higher among U.S.-born individuals, those reporting mixed Hispanic and non-Hispanic ancestries, those who speak only English at home, and those who live in tracts that are predominantly non-Hispanic. Racial identification and detailed Hispanic background also influence changes in Hispanic origin responses. Finally, changes in mode and relationship to the reference person in the household are associated with changes in Hispanic origin responses, suggesting that data collection elements also can influence Hispanic origin response change.
    View Full Paper PDF