CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 100

Longitudinal Business Database - 96

North American Industry Classification System - 92

National Science Foundation - 92

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 90

Current Population Survey - 87

Internal Revenue Service - 84

American Community Survey - 83

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 81

Employer Identification Numbers - 77

Social Security Administration - 65

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 63

Unemployment Insurance - 62

Center for Economic Studies - 59

Decennial Census - 57

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 55

Ordinary Least Squares - 55

Protected Identification Key - 53

Standard Industrial Classification - 53

Disclosure Review Board - 47

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 46

Business Register - 45

Cornell University - 42

Social Security Number - 41

International Trade Research Report - 40

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 37

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 37

Social Security - 35

Census Bureau Business Register - 33

National Bureau of Economic Research - 33

Research Data Center - 33

LEHD Program - 32

Individual Characteristics File - 31

Economic Census - 31

Employer Characteristics File - 29

Employment History File - 29

National Institute on Aging - 27

Local Employment Dynamics - 26

Federal Reserve Bank - 26

AKM - 25

Business Dynamics Statistics - 23

Department of Labor - 23

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 23

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 23

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 22

W-2 - 21

Service Annual Survey - 20

2010 Census - 20

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 19

County Business Patterns - 18

Person Validation System - 17

PSID - 17

University of Chicago - 17

University of Maryland - 17

Office of Personnel Management - 16

Census of Manufactures - 16

Core Based Statistical Area - 16

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 16

Employer-Household Dynamics - 15

Master Address File - 15

Special Sworn Status - 15

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 14

Census Numident - 14

Business Register Bridge - 14

Business Employment Dynamics - 14

Composite Person Record - 13

University of Michigan - 13

Total Factor Productivity - 13

American Economic Review - 13

American Economic Association - 13

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Department of Economics - 12

Technical Services - 12

National Center for Health Statistics - 12

Patent and Trademark Office - 11

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 11

Office of Management and Budget - 11

Successor Predecessor File - 11

Journal of Labor Economics - 11

Postal Service - 11

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 11

Indian Health Service - 10

Retail Trade - 10

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 10

Kauffman Foundation - 10

Labor Turnover Survey - 10

National Institutes of Health - 9

Company Organization Survey - 9

Department of Homeland Security - 9

LODES - 9

COVID-19 - 9

Housing and Urban Development - 9

Sloan Foundation - 9

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 9

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 8

Center for Research in Security Prices - 8

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 8

Person Identification Validation System - 8

United States Census Bureau - 8

Occupational Employment Statistics - 8

Columbia University - 8

Federal Reserve System - 8

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 8

Disability Insurance - 8

Accommodation and Food Services - 8

New York Times - 8

Journal of Political Economy - 8

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 8

Duke University - 8

Hypothesis 2 - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

North American Industry Classi - 8

Business Master File - 8

Securities and Exchange Commission - 7

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 7

CDF - 7

Agriculture, Forestry - 7

Cumulative Density Function - 7

Multiple Worksite Report - 7

Stanford University - 7

Educational Services - 7

NBER Summer Institute - 7

Urban Institute - 7

Review of Economics and Statistics - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

New York University - 7

Data Management System - 7

Survey of Business Owners - 7

MIT Press - 7

Harvard University - 7

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 7

Longitudinal Research Database - 7

BLS Handbook of Methods - 7

Census 2000 - 7

JOLTS - 7

Environmental Protection Agency - 6

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 6

Department of Education - 6

MAF-ARF - 6

Department of Health and Human Services - 6

Ohio State University - 6

Standard Occupational Classification - 6

Health Care and Social Assistance - 6

University of Toronto - 6

Generalized Method of Moments - 6

IZA - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 6

Personally Identifiable Information - 6

Society of Labor Economists - 6

Council of Economic Advisers - 6

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 6

Probability Density Function - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Characteristics of Business Owners - 6

Health and Retirement Study - 6

University of California Los Angeles - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Initial Public Offering - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 6

Oil and Gas Extraction - 5

Social and Economic Supplement - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Nonemployer Statistics - 5

Board of Governors - 5

Earned Income Tax Credit - 5

Survey of Consumer Finances - 5

Boston College - 5

Wholesale Trade - 5

Public Administration - 5

2SLS - 5

Department of Defense - 5

ASEC - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Business Services - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

UC Berkeley - 5

Cobb-Douglas - 5

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 5

Russell Sage Foundation - 5

CAAA - 5

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Sample Edited Detail File - 5

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 5

Department of Energy - 4

IQR - 4

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 4

University of California - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

Professional Services - 4

World Trade Organization - 4

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

SSA Numident - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

George Mason University - 4

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Census Industry Code - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

HHS - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 4

Georgetown University - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Current Employment Statistics - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Kauffman Firm Survey - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Public Use Micro Sample - 4

National Research Council - 4

WECD - 4

J16 - 3

Research and Development - 3

Adjusted Gross Income - 3

MTO - 3

J23 - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

PIKed - 3

COVID - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Geographic Information Systems - 3

Net Present Value - 3

Princeton University - 3

University of Virginia - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Master Beneficiary Record - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 3

World Bank - 3

1940 Census - 3

Yale University - 3

National Income and Product Accounts - 3

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 3

Harvard Business School - 3

National Opinion Research Center - 3

DOB - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Federal Government - 3

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 3

European Union - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

United Nations - 3

NUMIDENT - 3

Department of State - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

Labor Productivity - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Foreign Direct Investment - 3

Permanent Plant Number - 3

employ - 126

employed - 125

workforce - 121

employee - 102

labor - 100

earnings - 80

payroll - 61

recession - 56

worker - 54

hiring - 45

job - 42

salary - 41

economist - 41

survey - 37

entrepreneurship - 35

entrepreneur - 34

econometric - 34

quarterly - 34

unemployed - 33

earner - 32

census employment - 32

hire - 31

endogeneity - 30

heterogeneity - 30

tenure - 30

census bureau - 29

workplace - 26

employment dynamics - 26

earn - 25

estimating - 25

occupation - 24

agency - 24

employment statistics - 24

venture - 24

layoff - 23

longitudinal - 23

employing - 23

employment data - 22

employee data - 22

longitudinal employer - 22

respondent - 21

entrepreneurial - 21

statistical - 21

employer household - 21

census data - 20

data - 20

report - 18

acquisition - 18

turnover - 18

data census - 18

enterprise - 17

company - 17

research census - 17

employment estimates - 17

employment growth - 17

revenue - 17

macroeconomic - 16

shift - 16

incentive - 16

immigrant - 16

residential - 16

residence - 16

economic census - 16

discrimination - 15

population - 14

ethnicity - 14

disadvantaged - 14

employment earnings - 14

innovation - 14

aging - 14

unemployment rates - 13

opportunity - 13

work census - 13

housing - 13

industrial - 13

employment count - 13

metropolitan - 13

socioeconomic - 12

migration - 12

disclosure - 12

minority - 12

finance - 12

investment - 12

bias - 12

segregation - 12

researcher - 12

establishment - 12

ethnic - 12

migrant - 12

rent - 12

estimation - 12

analysis - 12

workforce indicators - 12

labor statistics - 12

economically - 11

regress - 11

disparity - 11

labor markets - 11

neighborhood - 11

growth - 11

patent - 11

compensation - 11

immigration - 11

organizational - 11

employment wages - 11

workers earnings - 11

econometrician - 11

wage data - 11

estimates employment - 11

founder - 11

employment flows - 10

relocation - 10

proprietor - 10

department - 10

sector - 10

welfare - 10

earnings employees - 10

endogenous - 10

unobserved - 10

trend - 10

worker demographics - 10

prospect - 10

mobility - 10

state - 10

retirement - 10

accounting - 10

microdata - 10

earnings workers - 10

clerical - 10

relocate - 9

corporate - 9

record - 9

irs - 9

spillover - 9

hispanic - 9

expenditure - 9

employment trends - 9

poverty - 9

imputation - 9

resident - 9

insurance - 9

wealth - 9

matching - 9

datasets - 9

information census - 8

database - 8

proprietorship - 8

censuses surveys - 8

debt - 8

race - 8

investor - 8

profit - 8

funding - 8

patenting - 8

innovative - 8

wages employment - 8

wage growth - 8

employment unemployment - 8

migrate - 8

tax - 8

use census - 8

innovate - 8

statistician - 8

bankruptcy - 8

employment measures - 8

census survey - 8

associate - 7

merger - 7

racial - 7

effect wages - 7

effects employment - 7

black - 7

inventory - 7

trends employment - 7

migrating - 7

manufacturing - 7

filing - 7

moving - 7

intergenerational - 7

leverage - 7

earnings age - 7

study - 7

research - 7

recession employment - 7

startup - 7

state employment - 7

employment declines - 6

corporation - 6

executive - 6

incorporated - 6

coverage - 6

employed census - 6

recessionary - 6

wage earnings - 6

market - 6

ssa - 6

home - 6

earnings growth - 6

refugee - 6

medicaid - 6

earnings inequality - 6

gdp - 6

household surveys - 6

pension - 6

federal - 6

unemployment insurance - 6

wages productivity - 6

census research - 6

linked census - 6

census business - 6

competitor - 6

earnings mobility - 6

measures employment - 6

privacy - 6

wage changes - 6

wage variation - 6

paper census - 6

exogeneity - 5

graduate - 5

institutional - 5

earnings gap - 5

assessed - 5

employment effects - 5

financial - 5

financing - 5

impact - 5

family - 5

maternal - 5

commute - 5

invention - 5

innovator - 5

younger firms - 5

firms young - 5

immigrant workers - 5

export - 5

woman - 5

renter - 5

worker wages - 5

transition - 5

native - 5

regressing - 5

aggregate - 5

saving - 5

model - 5

union - 5

startups employees - 5

industry employment - 5

rates employment - 5

citizen - 5

confidentiality - 5

decline - 5

restructuring - 5

employment entrepreneurship - 5

wage gap - 4

educated - 4

university - 4

earns - 4

academic - 4

career - 4

nonemployer businesses - 4

2010 census - 4

loan - 4

lender - 4

creditor - 4

shareholder - 4

enrollment - 4

wage effects - 4

urban - 4

city - 4

technological - 4

employment distribution - 4

immigrated - 4

relocating - 4

exporter - 4

multinational - 4

segregated - 4

neighbor - 4

geographically - 4

fund - 4

gender - 4

insured - 4

increase employment - 4

impact employment - 4

estimator - 4

income data - 4

wage industries - 4

contract - 4

demand - 4

productivity wage - 4

coverage employer - 4

labor productivity - 4

yearly - 4

startup firms - 4

emission - 4

pollution - 4

indicator - 4

statistical disclosure - 4

information - 4

heterogeneous - 4

statistical agencies - 4

college - 3

subsidiary - 3

consolidated - 3

firm data - 3

residing - 3

borrower - 3

takeover - 3

equity - 3

subsidy - 3

parental - 3

mother - 3

suburb - 3

innovating - 3

firms patents - 3

patents firms - 3

patenting firms - 3

specialization - 3

wage regressions - 3

katrina - 3

mexican - 3

generation - 3

homeowner - 3

taxation - 3

medicare - 3

birth - 3

parent - 3

advancement - 3

analyst - 3

industry wages - 3

wage differences - 3

percentile - 3

manager - 3

mortality - 3

enforcement - 3

policy - 3

reporting - 3

econometrically - 3

diversification - 3

strategic - 3

business data - 3

businesses census - 3

census years - 3

sale - 3

pollutant - 3

pollution exposure - 3

regional - 3

employment changes - 3

profitability - 3

ownership - 3

empirical - 3

acquirer - 3

census file - 3

bankrupt - 3

productivity growth - 3

enrollee - 3

average - 3

discrepancy - 3

employees startups - 3

regression - 3

employment recession - 3

decade - 3

sociology - 3

corp - 3

network - 3

exemption - 3

regressors - 3

retiree - 3

measure - 3

uninsured - 3

Viewing papers 211 through 220 of 246


  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Self-Employed Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-03

    A significant number of employees within the United States identify themselves as selfemployed, and they are distinct from the larger group identified as private jobholders. While socioeconomic and spatial information on these individuals is readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, it is possible to gain further information on their wage earnings by using data from administrative wage records. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data in order to examine self-employed jobholders - both as a whole and as subgroups defined according to their earned wage status - by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. Additionally, this report evaluates whether self-employed jobholders and the defined subgroups should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling. The analyses in this report use the sample of self-employed workers who lived in Los Angeles County, California.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Informal Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-02

    A significant number of employees within the United States can be considered "informal" or "off-the-books" workers. These workers, who by definition do not appear in administrative wage records, are distinct from the larger group of private jobholders who do appear in administrative records. However, while socioeconomic and spatial information on these individuals is readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, it is not possible to identify the informal workers by only using such data because of the lack of accurate, formal wage records. This study takes advantage of firm-based data that originates in Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data in order to examine informal jobholders by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. In addition this report evaluates whether informal jobholders should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling. The analyses in this report use the sample of workers who lived in Los Angeles County, California.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Social, Economic, Spatial, and Commuting Patterns of Dual Jobholders

    April 2007

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2007-01

    Individuals who hold multiple jobs have complex working lives and complex commuting patterns. Economic and spatial information on these individuals is not readily available in standard datasets, such as the 2000 Decennial Census Long Form, because the survey questions were not designed to collect details on multiple jobs. This study takes advantage of firm-based data from the Unemployment Insurance administrative wage records, linked with the Census Bureau's household-based data, to examine multiple jobholders - and specifically a sentinel group of dual jobholders. The study uses a sample from Los Angeles County, California and examines the dual jobholders by their demographic characteristics as well as their economic, commuting, and spatial location outcomes. In addition this report evaluates whether multiple jobholders should be included explicitly in future labor-workforce analyses and transportation modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring U.S. Innovative Activity

    March 2007

    Authors: B.K. Atrostic

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-07-11

    Innovation has long been credited as a leading source of economic strength and vitality in the United States because it leads to new goods and services and increases productivity, leading to better living standards. Better measures of innovative activities'activities including but not limited to innovation alone'could improve what we know about the sources of productivity and economic growth. The U.S. Census Bureau either currently collects, or has collected, data on some measures of innovative activities, such as the diffusion of innovations and technologies, human and organizational capital, entrepreneurship and other worker and firm characteristics, and the entry and exit of businesses, that research shows affect productivity and other measures of economic performance. But developing an understanding of how those effects work requires more than just measures of innovative activity. It also requires solid statistical information about core measures of the economy: that is, comprehensive coverage of all industries, including improved measures of output and sales and additional information on inputs and purchased materials at the micro (enterprise) level for the same economic unit over time (so the effects can be measured). Filling gaps in core data would allow us to rule out the possibility that a measure of innovative activity merely proxies for something that is omitted from or measured poorly in the core data, provide more information about innovative activities, and strengthen our ability to evaluate the performance of the entire economy. These gaps can be filled by better integrating existing data and by more structured collections of new data.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gross Job Flows for the U.S. Manufacturing Sector: Measurement from the Longitudinal Research Database

    December 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-30

    Measures of job creation and destruction are now produced regularly by the U.S. statistical agencies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases via the Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on a quarterly basis measures of job creation and destruction for the U.S. nonfarm business sector and related disaggregation by industrial sector and size class. The U.S. Census Bureau has developed the Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) covering the nonfarm business sector that has been used to produce research analysis and special tabulations including tabulations of job creation and destruction. Both of these data programs build upon the measurement methods and data analysis of job creation and destruction measures from the Longitudinal Research Database (LRD) developed and published by Davis, Haltiwanger and Schuh (1996). In this paper, the LRD based estimates of job creation and destruction are updated and made available for consistent annual and quarterly series from 1972-1998. While the BED and LBD programs are more comprehensive in scope than the LRD, the extensive development of the LRD permits the construction of measures of job creation and destruction for a rich array of employer characteristics including industry, size, business age, ownership structure, location and wage structure. The updated series that are released with this working paper provide measures along each of these dimensions. The paper describes in detail the changes in the processing of the Annual Survey of Manufactures over the 1972-1998 period that are important to incorporate by users of the LRD at Census Research Data Centers as well as users of products from the LRD such as job creation and destruction.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Distribution Preserving Statistical Disclosure Limitation

    September 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-04

    One approach to limiting disclosure risk in public-use microdata is to release multiply-imputed, partially synthetic data sets. These are data on actual respondents, but with confidential data replaced by multiply-imputed synthetic values. A mis-specified imputation model can invalidate inferences because the distribution of synthetic data is completely determined by the model used to generate them. We present two practical methods of generating synthetic values when the imputer has only limited information about the true data generating process. One is applicable when the true likelihood is known up to a monotone transformation. The second requires only limited knowledge of the true likelihood, but nevertheless preserves the conditional distribution of the confidential data, up to sampling error, on arbitrary subdomains. Our method maximizes data utility and minimizes incremental disclosure risk up to posterior uncertainty in the imputation model and sampling error in the estimated transformation. We validate the approach with a simulation and application to a large linked employer-employee database.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Using linked employer-employee data to investigate the speed of adjustments in downsizing firms

    May 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-03

    When firms are faced with a demand shock, adjustment can take many forms. Firms can adjust physical capital, human capital, or both. The speed of adjustment may differ as well: costs of adjustment, the type of shock, the legal and economic enviroment all matter. In this paper, we focus on firms that downsized between 1992 and 1997, but ultimately survive, and investigate how the human capital distribution within a firm influences the speed of adjustment, ceteris paribus. In other words, when do firms use mass layoffs instead of attrition to adjust the level of employment. We combine worker-level wage records and measures of human capital with firm-level characteristics of the production function, and use levels and changes in these variables to characterize the choice of adjustment method and speed. Firms are described/compared up to 9 years prior to death. We also consider how workers fare after leaving downsizing firms, and analyze if observed differences in post-separation outcomes of workers provide clues to the choice of adjustment speed.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Dynamics of Young and Small Businesses: Integrating the Employer and Nonemployer Universes

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-06-04

    We develop a preliminary version of an Integrated Longitudinal Business Database (ILBD) that combines administrative records and survey-based data for virtually all employer and nonemployer business units in the United States. In the process, we confront conceptual and practical issues that arise in measuring the importance and dynamic behavior of younger and smaller businesses. We also document some basic facts about younger and smaller businesses. In doing so, we exploit the ability of the ILBD to follow business transitions between employer and nonemployer status, and vice-versa. This aspect of the ILBD opens a new frontier for the study of business formation and the precursors to job creation in the U.S. economy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Confidentiality Protection in the Census Bureau Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    February 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-02

    The QuarterlyWorkforce Indicators are new estimates developed by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. These data provide detailed quarterly statistics on employment, accessions, layoffs, hires, separations, full-quarter employment (and related flows), job creations, job destructions, and earnings (for flow and stock categories of workers). The data are released for NAICS industries (and 4-digit SICs) at the county, workforce investment board, and metropolitan area levels of geography. The confidential microdata - unemployment insurance wage records, ES-202 establishment employment, and Title 13 demographic and economic information - are protected using a permanent multiplicative noise distortion factor. This factor distorts all input sums, counts, differences and ratios. The released statistics are analytically valid - measures are unbiased and time series properties are preserved. The confidentiality protection is manifested in the release of some statistics that are flagged as "significantly distorted to preserve confidentiality." These statistics differ from the undistorted statistics by a significant proportion. Even for the significantly distorted statistics, the data remain analytically valid for time series properties. The released data can be aggregated; however, published aggregates are less distorted than custom postrelease aggregates. In addition to the multiplicative noise distortion, confidentiality protection is provided by the estimation process for the QWIs, which multiply imputes all missing data (including missing establishment, given UI account, in the UI wage record data) and dynamically re-weights the establishment data to provide state-level comparability with the BLS's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators

    January 2006

    Working Paper Number:

    tp-2006-01

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, has built a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. Beginning in 2003 and building on this infrastructure, the Census Bureau has published the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), a new collection of data series that offers unprecedented detail on the local dynamics of labor markets. Despite the fine detail, confidentiality is maintained due to the application of state-of-the-art confidentiality protection methods. This article describes how the input files are compiled and combined to create the infrastructure files. We describe the multiple imputation methods used to impute in missing data and the statistical matching techniques used to combine and edit data when a direct identifier match requires improvement. Both of these innovations are crucial to the success of the final product. Finally, we pay special attention to the details of the confidentiality protection system used to protect the identity and micro data values of the underlying entities used to form the published estimates. We provide a brief description of public-use and restricted-access data files with pointers to further documentation for researchers interested in using these data.
    View Full Paper PDF