CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Longitudinal Business Database'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

North American Industry Classification System - 240

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 145

Center for Economic Studies - 132

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 130

Employer Identification Numbers - 113

Internal Revenue Service - 112

Standard Industrial Classification - 112

National Science Foundation - 106

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 101

Ordinary Least Squares - 100

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 99

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 98

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 97

National Bureau of Economic Research - 96

Total Factor Productivity - 91

Business Register - 89

Economic Census - 87

Business Dynamics Statistics - 79

Census of Manufactures - 75

Census Bureau Business Register - 70

Disclosure Review Board - 67

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 64

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 63

Federal Reserve Bank - 62

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 62

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 56

Current Population Survey - 55

American Community Survey - 52

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 50

County Business Patterns - 48

Social Security Administration - 40

Special Sworn Status - 40

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 39

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 39

Kauffman Foundation - 38

Patent and Trademark Office - 37

Department of Homeland Security - 36

Research Data Center - 34

Decennial Census - 33

International Trade Research Report - 33

Longitudinal Research Database - 33

University of Chicago - 33

Cobb-Douglas - 31

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 31

Service Annual Survey - 31

University of Maryland - 30

Federal Reserve System - 29

Survey of Business Owners - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 29

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 28

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 28

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 26

Retail Trade - 26

Small Business Administration - 25

Social Security - 25

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 25

World Bank - 25

Department of Labor - 23

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 23

Wholesale Trade - 23

Securities and Exchange Commission - 22

Protected Identification Key - 22

Company Organization Survey - 21

Department of Economics - 21

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 21

Social Security Number - 21

World Trade Organization - 20

Technical Services - 20

W-2 - 20

Initial Public Offering - 20

New York University - 19

Business Employment Dynamics - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

Harmonized System - 17

Cornell University - 17

Individual Characteristics File - 17

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Board of Governors - 16

Annual Business Survey - 16

University of Michigan - 16

Census of Retail Trade - 16

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

Postal Service - 16

Accommodation and Food Services - 16

Employer Characteristics File - 15

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 15

Center for Research in Security Prices - 15

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

Unemployment Insurance - 15

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 15

Characteristics of Business Owners - 15

Generalized Method of Moments - 15

Employment History File - 15

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

General Accounting Office - 14

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 14

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 14

American Economic Association - 14

Local Employment Dynamics - 14

American Economic Review - 14

Boston College - 13

2010 Census - 13

Department of Agriculture - 13

NBER Summer Institute - 13

European Union - 13

Energy Information Administration - 13

Occupational Employment Statistics - 13

Arts, Entertainment - 13

Core Based Statistical Area - 13

COMPUSTAT - 13

University of California Los Angeles - 13

Review of Economics and Statistics - 13

Business Services - 12

Establishment Micro Properties - 12

COVID-19 - 12

IQR - 12

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 12

Foreign Direct Investment - 12

Public Administration - 12

Journal of Economic Literature - 12

North American Industry Classi - 12

Linear Probability Models - 11

National Establishment Time Series - 11

Federal Trade Commission - 11

Guzman and Stern - 11

Limited Liability Company - 11

Labor Productivity - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Stanford University - 11

IBM - 11

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 11

Kauffman Firm Survey - 11

Retirement History Survey - 11

Bureau of Labor - 11

Harvard University - 11

Permanent Plant Number - 11

Department of Commerce - 10

Customs and Border Protection - 10

Harvard Business School - 10

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 10

TFPQ - 10

Business Formation Statistics - 10

Department of Energy - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 10

Health Care and Social Assistance - 10

University of Toronto - 10

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 10

Federal Register - 9

Agriculture, Forestry - 9

Columbia University - 9

Journal of Political Economy - 9

Professional Services - 9

New York Times - 9

Sloan Foundation - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Statistics Canada - 9

State Energy Data System - 9

Duke University - 9

European Commission - 8

International Trade Commission - 8

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

Current Employment Statistics - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

University of California - 8

National Institutes of Health - 8

National Employer Survey - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Hypothesis 2 - 8

Educational Services - 8

Census Numident - 8

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 8

Data Management System - 8

George Mason University - 8

North American Free Trade Agreement - 8

Journal of International Economics - 8

2SLS - 7

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 7

TFPR - 7

Department of Justice - 7

University of Texas - 7

Employer-Household Dynamics - 7

Person Validation System - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

United States Census Bureau - 7

Ohio State University - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

VAR - 7

E32 - 7

Net Present Value - 7

Census of Services - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Northwestern University - 7

University of Minnesota - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 7

Securities Data Company - 7

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 7

Chicago RDC - 7

Wal-Mart - 7

Supreme Court - 6

Oil and Gas Extraction - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

CAAA - 6

AKM - 6

IZA - 6

Princeton University - 6

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Master Address File - 6

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

MIT Press - 6

Business Master File - 6

Department of State - 5

Disability Insurance - 5

Research and Development - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Federal Statistical System - 5

HHS - 5

Washington University - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Georgetown University - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Computer Network Use Supplement - 5

United Nations - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Commodity Flow Survey - 5

PSID - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Form W-2 - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

COVID - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Insurance Information Institute - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

JOLTS - 4

1940 Census - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Stern School of Business - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Yale University - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

DOB - 4

National Research Council - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Administrative Records - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Fabricated Metal Products - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

ASEC - 3

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Value Added - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Princeton University Press - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Penn State University - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

John Haltiwanger - 41

Lucia Foster - 30

Ron Jarmin - 26

Javier Miranda - 25

Emin Dinlersoz - 19

Nathan Goldschlag - 17

Fariha Kamal - 13

Cheryl Grim - 12

Martha Stinson - 11

William Kerr - 11

Henry Hyatt - 10

Teresa C. Fort - 10

J. David Brown - 10

Zoltan Wolf - 9

Shawn Klimek - 9

Emek Basker - 8

Erik Brynjolfsson - 8

J. Daniel Kim - 8

Catherine Buffington - 8

Peter Schott - 8

Nikolas Zolas - 8

C.J. Krizan - 8

John S. Earle - 7

Erika McEntarfer - 7

Xavier Giroud - 7

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 7

G. Jacob Blackwood - 6

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Zachary Kroff - 6

Steven J. Davis - 6

Nicholas Bloom - 6

Rebecca Zarutskie - 6

Paige Ouimet - 6

Benjamin Pugsley - 6

Lars Vilhuber - 6

Christopher Goetz - 5

Tania Babina - 5

John M. Abowd - 5

Timothy Dunne - 5

Hyunseob Kim - 5

Mariko Sakakibara - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Nuri Ersahin - 5

Joseph Staudt - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Kristin Sandusky - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Kyle Handley - 4

Adela Luque - 4

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Jerome P. Reiter - 4

Ufuk Akcigit - 4

Kevin L. McKinney - 4

Justin Pierce - 4

Holger M. Mueller - 4

Scott Ohlmacher - 4

Peter J. Klenow - 4

Matthias Kehrig - 4

J. Bradford Jensen - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

Jagadeesh Sivadasan - 4

Robert Seamans - 3

J. Frank Li - 3

Yueyuan Ma - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Jeremy Greenwood - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Gordon M Phillips - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Ryan Monarch - 3

Wenting Ma - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Veronika Penciakova - 3

Daron Acemoglu - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Sari Pekkala Kerr - 3

Chang-Tai Hsieh - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Geoffrey Tate - 3

Liu Yang - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Asha Sundaram - 3

Aysegül Sahin - 3

Julia I. Lane - 3

Craig Wesley Carpenter - 3

Robert Kulick - 3

Chad Syverson - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Rustom M. Irani - 3

Edward Glaeser - 3

Allan Collard-Wexler - 3

Mercedes Delgado - 3

growth - 93

manufacturing - 92

employ - 90

market - 89

entrepreneurship - 83

employed - 78

labor - 77

entrepreneur - 77

recession - 77

sector - 76

macroeconomic - 73

company - 72

industrial - 71

workforce - 71

employee - 68

production - 68

revenue - 66

enterprise - 66

econometric - 65

investment - 63

sale - 62

gdp - 55

entrepreneurial - 53

innovation - 53

economist - 53

economically - 50

payroll - 49

venture - 49

earnings - 47

acquisition - 47

export - 46

finance - 43

expenditure - 42

financial - 41

endogeneity - 41

establishment - 40

quarterly - 38

estimating - 38

patent - 37

employment growth - 34

organizational - 33

spillover - 32

manufacturer - 32

corporation - 32

agency - 31

demand - 31

multinational - 30

survey - 30

trend - 30

merger - 30

exporter - 29

worker - 29

produce - 28

hiring - 27

inventory - 27

proprietor - 27

wholesale - 27

proprietorship - 27

leverage - 26

patenting - 26

technological - 25

aggregate - 25

import - 25

investor - 24

debt - 24

startup - 24

corporate - 23

financing - 23

profit - 23

loan - 22

accounting - 21

incorporated - 21

job - 21

productivity growth - 21

incentive - 20

bank - 20

innovative - 20

occupation - 20

subsidiary - 20

trading - 19

efficiency - 19

innovate - 19

earner - 19

disclosure - 19

productive - 19

regional - 19

monopolistic - 18

longitudinal - 18

invention - 18

report - 18

competitor - 18

employment dynamics - 18

equity - 17

funding - 17

bankruptcy - 17

lender - 17

founder - 17

profitability - 17

estimation - 17

lending - 17

statistical - 17

hire - 17

importer - 17

metropolitan - 17

firms grow - 17

exporting - 16

regress - 16

shock - 16

geographically - 16

data - 16

technology - 15

declining - 15

decline - 15

tariff - 15

impact - 15

banking - 15

stock - 15

economic census - 15

regulation - 14

supplier - 14

exported - 14

turnover - 14

region - 14

econometrician - 14

borrowing - 14

microdata - 14

opportunity - 14

retail - 14

data census - 14

respondent - 14

prospect - 14

growth productivity - 14

researcher - 14

foreign - 14

immigrant - 14

industry productivity - 14

custom - 13

invest - 13

population - 13

creditor - 13

productivity dispersion - 13

heterogeneity - 13

unemployed - 13

salary - 13

census bureau - 13

area - 13

firms export - 12

investing - 12

depreciation - 12

employment statistics - 12

diversification - 12

borrower - 12

retailer - 12

country - 12

wages productivity - 12

employment data - 12

younger firms - 12

warehousing - 12

rent - 12

sourcing - 12

firms productivity - 12

state - 12

startup firms - 12

business data - 12

regression - 12

shipment - 11

regulatory - 11

minority - 11

federal - 11

liquidation - 11

innovating - 11

exogeneity - 11

layoff - 11

database - 11

census data - 11

record - 11

labor markets - 11

factory - 11

business startups - 11

rural - 11

innovator - 11

endogenous - 11

city - 11

corp - 11

manager - 11

aggregate productivity - 11

ownership - 11

acquirer - 11

labor statistics - 10

census employment - 10

monopolistically - 10

strategic - 10

collateral - 10

patented - 10

relocation - 10

earn - 10

firms patents - 10

employment estimates - 10

trends employment - 10

firms young - 10

sectoral - 10

producing - 10

larger firms - 10

contract - 10

ethnicity - 10

geography - 10

datasets - 10

labor productivity - 10

retirement - 9

fund - 9

union - 9

bankrupt - 9

startups employees - 9

shift - 9

oligopolistic - 9

emission - 9

epa - 9

credit - 9

businesses grow - 9

workplace - 9

employment trends - 9

shareholder - 9

growth employment - 9

international trade - 9

hispanic - 9

migrant - 9

importing - 9

immigration - 9

research - 9

firm growth - 9

growth firms - 9

study - 9

outsourcing - 9

employing - 9

wealth - 9

consumer - 9

productivity measures - 9

takeover - 9

institutional - 8

debtor - 8

tenure - 8

regressing - 8

compensation - 8

borrow - 8

housing - 8

product - 8

specialization - 8

executive - 8

commerce - 8

competitiveness - 8

patents firms - 8

wage growth - 8

firms employment - 8

globalization - 8

exporters multinationals - 8

development - 8

outsourced - 8

imported - 8

firms size - 8

subsidy - 8

firm dynamics - 8

estimates employment - 8

externality - 8

productivity firms - 8

industry employment - 8

conglomerate - 8

census business - 7

unemployment rates - 7

average - 7

irs - 7

productivity distribution - 7

bias - 7

aggregation - 7

entry productivity - 7

pollution - 7

mortgage - 7

information census - 7

consolidated - 7

dispersion productivity - 7

measures productivity - 7

nonemployer businesses - 7

recessionary - 7

technology adoption - 7

census survey - 7

productivity estimates - 7

productivity shocks - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

developed - 7

patenting firms - 7

work census - 7

employment firms - 7

share - 7

firms trade - 7

exporting firms - 7

multinational firms - 7

reallocation productivity - 7

neighborhood - 7

geographic - 7

trademark - 7

downturn - 7

employee data - 7

agriculture - 7

regional economic - 7

cost - 7

buyer - 7

restructuring - 7

firms exporting - 6

tax - 6

restaurant - 6

spending - 6

unobserved - 6

employment distribution - 6

environmental - 6

polluting - 6

trader - 6

advancement - 6

innovation patenting - 6

migration - 6

warehouse - 6

sector productivity - 6

firm innovation - 6

firm patenting - 6

factor productivity - 6

innovation productivity - 6

employees startups - 6

worker demographics - 6

firms age - 6

regressors - 6

poverty - 6

good - 6

industry wages - 6

urban - 6

analysis - 6

decade - 6

competitive - 6

industry concentration - 6

firms census - 6

immigrant entrepreneurs - 6

confidentiality - 6

statistician - 6

coverage - 6

matching - 6

managerial - 6

management - 6

productivity wage - 6

capital - 6

businesses census - 6

rates employment - 6

fluctuation - 6

aging - 6

volatility - 6

asset - 5

pension - 5

discrimination - 5

filing - 5

productivity capital - 5

state employment - 5

impact employment - 5

forecast - 5

diversified - 5

tech - 5

socioeconomic - 5

department - 5

store - 5

grocery - 5

disaster - 5

prevalence - 5

security - 5

rates productivity - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

wage regressions - 5

autoregressive - 5

employment production - 5

job growth - 5

employment entrepreneurship - 5

industry variation - 5

diversify - 5

plant productivity - 5

publicly - 5

transition - 5

pricing - 5

imputation - 5

recession exposure - 5

rate - 5

equilibrium - 5

elasticity - 5

price - 5

use census - 5

exogenous - 5

estimator - 5

yield - 5

employment wages - 5

census research - 5

foreign trade - 5

research census - 5

censuses surveys - 5

exports firms - 5

profitable - 5

pollutant - 5

residential - 5

agglomeration - 5

2010 census - 4

mandate - 4

census disclosure - 4

employment declines - 4

establishments data - 4

employment count - 4

productivity variation - 4

analyst - 4

employment flows - 4

relocate - 4

university - 4

productivity analysis - 4

risk - 4

hurricane - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

indian - 4

native - 4

firms import - 4

midwest - 4

immigrant workers - 4

marketing - 4

productivity increases - 4

industry growth - 4

location - 4

ethnic - 4

enforcement - 4

privacy - 4

insurance - 4

healthcare - 4

consumption - 4

electricity - 4

electricity prices - 4

black - 4

employer household - 4

level productivity - 4

reporting - 4

workers earnings - 4

earnings workers - 4

plants industry - 4

productivity size - 4

local economic - 4

saving - 4

franchising - 4

downstream - 4

recession employment - 4

census years - 4

census use - 4

business survival - 4

customer - 4

gain - 4

productivity plants - 4

earnings growth - 4

wages production - 4

linked census - 4

utilization - 4

clerical - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

trade models - 4

generation - 4

information - 4

inference - 4

retailing - 4

statistical agencies - 4

resident - 4

agglomeration economies - 4

cluster - 4

regional industry - 4

regional industries - 4

restriction - 3

racial - 3

disparity - 3

quantity - 3

deviation - 3

measures employment - 3

applicant - 3

home - 3

graduate - 3

associate - 3

identifier - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

merchandise - 3

percentile - 3

www census - 3

oligopoly - 3

disadvantaged - 3

town - 3

advantage - 3

wages employment - 3

poorer - 3

migrate - 3

earnings age - 3

capital productivity - 3

economic growth - 3

small firms - 3

career - 3

expense - 3

relocating - 3

plant employment - 3

policymakers - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

medicare - 3

energy prices - 3

renewable - 3

policy - 3

productivity differences - 3

regulation productivity - 3

employment earnings - 3

earnings employees - 3

effect wages - 3

wage data - 3

firms plants - 3

owner - 3

industries estimate - 3

technical - 3

industrialized - 3

taxation - 3

white - 3

asian - 3

subsidized - 3

woman - 3

increase employment - 3

earnings inequality - 3

export growth - 3

trends labor - 3

survey data - 3

employed census - 3

surveys censuses - 3

employment measures - 3

rurality - 3

agricultural - 3

substitute - 3

franchise - 3

model - 3

supermarket - 3

empirical - 3

valuation - 3

demography - 3

plant investment - 3

environmental regulation - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 406


  • Working Paper

    The Evolving Impact of Founders on Startup Employee Retention

    March 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-21

    Founders are known to attract prospective employees by signaling their startup's mission, culture, and potential. But do they also shape who stays? And if so, does the founder's influence diminish as the startup matures? Using matched employer-employee data from the U.S. Census, we address these questions, especially focusing on cases of founder premature death to identify plausibly exogenous exits. We find that founder departures significantly increase employee turnover. These effects are stronger in older and larger startups. Further analyses show that the impact of founder departure is more salient among employees who had longer shared tenure or have the same sex as the founder. These patterns suggest that employees develop complementarities with founders over time'an alignment in skills, relationships, or culture'that reinforce founders' influence as startups mature.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trade and Welfare (across Local Labor Markets)

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-16

    What are the welfare implications of trade shocks? Theoretically, we provide a sufficient statistic that measures changes in welfare (to a first-order approximation) for the set of workers who start within a region, taking into account adjustment in frictional unemployment, labor force participation, the sectors to which workers apply for jobs, and the regions in which workers choose to live. Our theory is flexible; for instance, it allows for arbitrary heterogeneity in worker productivity and non-pecuniary returns (amenities) across unemployment, labor force non-participation, sectors, and regions. Empirically, we apply these insights to measure changes in welfare between 2000-2007 across workers who start in different commuting zones (CZs) in the U.S. in the year 2000. Finally, we identify the differential impact across CZs of a particular trade shock: granting China permanent normal trade relations.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Establishment-Level Life Cycle and Analysts' Forecasts

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-12

    This paper examines how multi-unit firms' life-cycle stages affect analyst forecast accuracy. While prior studies focus on the firm-level life cycle, we utilize the Census data and focus on the establishment level. We find that analyst forecast accuracy is lower for multi-unit firms whose establishments are in different life-cycle stages than those in the same life-cycle stage. This finding suggests that the forecasting difficulty of more diversified firms can be attributed to the different life-cycle stages of each establishment. We also find that for firms whose units are in different stages, analyst forecast accuracy is lower if the establishments in earlier stages are larger (i.e., generate more revenue) than those in later stages. As a comparison, we estimate the life-cycle stages using firms' segment classifications in their 10-K filings. We find that analysts' forecast accuracy is lower when firms report fewer segments than the number of establishments, suggesting that aggregating more establishments for segment reporting could complicate analysts' forecasting. To our knowledge, this is the first study that focuses on the establishment-level life cycle. This study highlights that firm-level life cycles should not be taken without caution, as aggregating multiple units' life cycles may be misleading. In order to provide better forecasts to investors, analysts should have a deeper understanding of firms' subunits, especially when the establishments are in different life-cycle stages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Expectations versus Reality in Business Formation

    February 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-11

    Using administrative data on 17 million U.S. business applications linked to outcomes, we compare potential entrants' expectations about employer entry and first-year employment with realizations. On average, applicants overestimate employment, mainly because many expect to enter but do not. Among those who expect and achieve entry, employment is typically underestimated. Expected employment predicts entry and realized employment, but conditional on entry realized employment rises less than one-for-one with expectations. Expectation errors are highly heterogeneous and systematically related to application characteristics and local economic conditions, and they predict near-term employment outcomes. A parsimonious model with heterogeneous priors, learning, and pre-entry selection rationalizes these patterns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Fresh Start or Fresh Water: The impact of Environmental Lender Liability

    January 2026

    Authors: Aymeric Bellon

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-05

    I study the impact of lenders' environmental responsibility. The empirical setting exploits the U.S. Lender Liability Act of 1996, which reduced lenders' exposure to the environmental clean-up costs attached to some of their debtors' collateral, and employs difference-indifferences specifications estimated using EPA and U.S. Census microdata. Firms whose lenders face lower environmental liability risks increase pollution, reduce investment in abatement technologies by 14.7%, while experiencing small production and employment distortions. Lenders facing higher liability risks offer loans with less favorable pricing, thus financially incentivizing firms to become more environmentally responsible, and potentially monitor borrowers via shorter debt maturity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Same Shock, Separate Channels: House Prices and Firm Performance in the Great Recession

    January 2026

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-26-03

    Combining confidential business-level microdata with housing and banking data, I document large and persistent effects of local house prices on employment at small businesses, and particularly young businesses, during the Great Recession. I show that the effect on entry is important for explaining the disproportionate effect on young businesses, while young firm exit is also disproportionately affected. I then explore the channels through which house prices affect business outcomes. I use survey data to show that reliance on either personal assets or home equity is associated with increased sensitivity to house prices. I then use local bank balance sheet information to show both young and old firms are sensitive to local credit shocks, with some evidence of a larger effect on young businesses. I develop a macroeconomic model that is consistent with these findings where house prices work through two channels: a bank credit supply channel and a housing collateral channel.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Food Fight: U.S. Exporters' Adjustments to Russia's 2014 Agricultural Import Ban

    December 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-79

    This paper examines the impact of Russia's 2014 food-import ban on U.S. firms that exported banned products to Russia. Using confidential customs transaction data, we implement triple-difference and dosage-response approaches to identify how firms adjust to the sudden loss of a market. Following the ban, treated firms experienced a 30 percentage-point decrease in the probability of exporting banned food to Russia relative to control firms. However, there is substantial heterogeneity by pre-ban reliance on the Russian market: heavily reliant firms were significantly less likely to survive once the ban was in place, and survivors experienced large reductions in revenue (19%) and total export value (49%) for each standard deviation increase in Russian market exposure. We find evidence of export redirection to neighboring countries, though it is insufficient to offset losses. Any negative impacts on survivors dissipate by five years post-ban.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Technology-Driven Market Concentration through Idea Allocation

    December 2025

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-78

    Using a newly-created measure of technology novelty, this paper identifies periods with and without technology breakthroughs from the 1980s to the 2020s in the US. It is found that market concentration decreases at the advent of revolutionary technologies. We establish a theory addressing inventors' decisions to establish new firms or join incumbents of selected sizes, yielding two key predictions: (1) A higher share of inventors opt for new firms during periods of heightened technology novelty. (2). There is positive assortative matching between idea quality and firm size if inventors join incumbents. Both predictions align with empirical findings and collectively contribute to a reduction in market concentration when groundbreaking technologies occur. Quantitative analysis shows the overall slowdown in technological breakthroughs can capture 95.9% of the rising trend in market concentration and the correlation between the model-generated and the actual detrended market concentration is 0.910.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Specialization in a Knowledge Economy

    December 2025

    Authors: Yueyuan Ma

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-77

    Using firm-level data from the US Census Longitudinal Business Database (LBD), this paper exhibits novel evidence about a wave of specialization experienced by US firms in the 1980s and 1990s. Specifically: (i) Firms, especially innovating ones, decreased production scope, i.e., the number of industries in which they produce. (ii) Innovation and production separated, with small firms specializing in innovation and large firms in production. Higher patent trading efficiency and stronger patent protection are proposed to explain these phenomena. An endogenous growth model is developed with potential mismatches between innovation and production. Calibrating the model suggests that increased trading efficiency and better patent protection can explain 20% of the observed production scope decrease and 108% of the innovation and production separation. They result in a 0.64 percent point increase in the annual economic growth rate. Empirical analyses provide evidence of causality from pro-patent reforms in the 1980s to the two specialization patterns.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trapped or Transferred: Worker Mobility and Labor Market Power in the Energy Transition

    December 2025

    Authors: Minwoo Hyun

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-25-76

    Using matched employer-employee data covering 1.35 million US workers separated from the fossil fuel extraction industry between 1999 and 2019, I estimate how local fossil fuel labor demand shocks affect employment and earnings. Employment probabilities fall markedly after exposure, and earnings decline gradually over the first seven years with only partial recovery by ten years since exposure to the shocks. Workers who remain in the fossil fuel sector, disproportionately men in sector-specific roles, experience nearly twice the earnings losses of those who switch sectors, possibly due to limited occupational mobility. Among non-switchers, losses are larger in labor markets with high employer concentration, indicating that scarce outside options translate into lower reemployment wages and weaker bargaining positions. Geographic movers fare worse than stayers, reflecting negative selection (younger, lower-earning) and relocation to metropolitan areas where fossil fuel or low-skilled service sectors remain highly concentrated, leaving monopsony power intact.
    View Full Paper PDF