CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Harvard University'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Ordinary Least Squares - 14

National Science Foundation - 13

National Bureau of Economic Research - 11

Longitudinal Business Database - 11

Center for Economic Studies - 10

American Community Survey - 10

University of Chicago - 10

American Economic Review - 10

Standard Industrial Classification - 10

North American Industry Classification System - 8

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 8

Columbia University - 8

Protected Identification Key - 7

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 7

Decennial Census - 7

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 7

Longitudinal Research Database - 7

Social Security Administration - 6

Social Security - 6

Internal Revenue Service - 6

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 6

Social Security Number - 6

Journal of Political Economy - 6

Current Population Survey - 6

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 6

Kauffman Foundation - 6

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 5

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 5

New York University - 5

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 5

W-2 - 5

Yale University - 5

Research Data Center - 5

Stanford University - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

MIT Press - 5

Princeton University Press - 5

Review of Economics and Statistics - 5

Census of Manufactures - 5

Federal Reserve Bank - 5

Special Sworn Status - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 4

University of Maryland - 4

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 4

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 4

Disclosure Review Board - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

American Economic Association - 4

Boston College - 3

Harmonized System - 3

University of Michigan - 3

Census Numident - 3

Supreme Court - 3

Postal Service - 3

Person Validation System - 3

Employer Identification Numbers - 3

2010 Census - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Small Business Administration - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 3

World Bank - 3

Journal of International Economics - 3

Office of Management and Budget - 3

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 3

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 3

New York Times - 3

National Institutes of Health - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

Cobb-Douglas - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 3

Cambridge University Press - 3

Characteristics of Business Owners - 3

WECD - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

Viewing papers 11 through 20 of 40


  • Working Paper

    Structural versus Ethnic Dimensions of Housing Segregation

    March 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-22

    Racial residential segregation is still very high in many American cities. Some portion of segregation is attributable to socioeconomic differences across racial lines; some portion is caused by purely racial factors, such as preferences about the racial composition of one's neighborhood or discrimination in the housing market. Social scientists have had great difficulty disaggregating segregation into a portion that can be explained by interracial differences in socioeconomic characteristics (what we call structural factors) versus a portion attributable to racial and ethnic factors. What would such a measure look like? In this paper, we draw on a new source of data to develop an innovative structural segregation measure that shows the amount of segregation that would remain if we could assign households to housing units based only on non-racial socioeconomic characteristics. This inquiry provides vital building blocks for the broader enterprise of understanding and remedying housing segregation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Taking the Leap: The Determinants of Entrepreneurs Hiring their First Employee

    January 2016

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-16-48

    Job creation is one of the most important aspects of entrepreneurship, but we know relatively little about the hiring patterns and decisions of startups. Longitudinal data from the Integrated Longitudinal Business Database (iLBD), Kauffman Firm Survey (KFS), and the Growing America through Entrepreneurship (GATE) experiment are used to provide some of the first evidence in the literature on the determinants of taking the leap from a non-employer to employer firm among startups. Several interesting patterns emerge regarding the dynamics of non-employer startups hiring their first employee. Hiring rates among the universe of non-employer startups are very low, but increase when the population of non-employers is focused on more growth-oriented businesses such as incorporated and EIN businesses. If non-employer startups hire, the bulk of hiring occurs in the first few years of existence. After this point in time relatively few non-employer startups hire an employee. Focusing on more growth- and employment-oriented startups in the KFS, we find that Asian-owned and Hispanic-owned startups have higher rates of hiring their first employee than white-owned startups. Female-owned startups are roughly 10 percentage points less likely to hire their first employee by the first, second and seventh years after startup. The education level of the owner, however, is not found to be associated with the probability of hiring an employee. Among business characteristics, we find evidence that business assets and intellectual property are associated with hiring the first employee. Using data from the largest random experiment providing entrepreneurship training in the United States ever conducted, we do not find evidence that entrepreneurship training increases the likelihood that non-employers hire their first employee.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Identifying Foreign Suppliers in U.S. Merchandise Import Transactions

    April 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-11

    The availability of international trade transactions data capturing individual relationships between buyers and suppliers permits the answering of numerous new questions governing the economic activity of traders. In this paper, we explore the reliability of two-sided firm trade transactions data sourced from the United States by comparing the number of foreign suppliers from U.S. merchandise import transaction data to origin-country data. We find that the statistic derived from the origin-country data, on average, tends to be 20 percent lower than using the raw U.S. data. Guided by this finding, we propose and implement a set of methods that are capable of aligning the counts more closely from these two different data sources. Overall, our analysis presents broad support for the use of U.S. merchandise import transactions data to study buyer-supplier relationships in international trade.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Buyer-Seller Relationships in International Trade: Do Your Neighbors Matter?

    October 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-44

    Using confidential U.S. customs data on trade transactions between U.S. importers and Bangladeshi exporters between 2002 and 2009, and information on the geographic location of Bangladeshi exporters, we show that the presence of neighboring exporters that previously transacted with a U.S. importer is associated with a greater likelihood of matching with the same U.S. importer for the first time. This suggests a role for business networks among trading firms in generating exporter-importer matches. Our research design also allows us to isolate potential gains from neighborhood exporter presence that are partner-specific, from overall gains previously documented in the literature.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    It's Where You Work: Increases In Earnings Dispersion Across Establishments And Individuals In The U.S.

    September 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-33

    This paper links data on establishments and individuals to analyze the role of establishments in the increase in inequality that has become a central topic in economic analysis and policy debate. It decomposes changes in the variance of ln earnings among individuals into the part due to changes in earnings among establishments and the part due to changes in earnings within-establishments and finds that much of the 1970s-2010s increase in earnings inequality results from increased dispersion of the earnings among the establishments where individuals work. It also shows that the divergence of establishment earnings occurred within and across industries and was associated with increased variance of revenues per worker. Our results direct attention to the fundamental role of establishment-level pay setting and economic adjustments in earnings inequality.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    INNOVATION, REALLOCATION AND GROWTH

    April 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-23

    We build a model of firm-level innovation, productivity growth and reallocation featuring endogenous entry and exit. A key feature is the selection between high- and low-type firms, which differ in terms of their innovative capacity. We estimate the parameters of the model using detailed US Census micro data on firm-level output, R&D and patenting. The model provides a good fit to the dynamics of firm entry and exit, output and R&D, and its implied elasticities are in the ballpark of a range of micro estimates. We find industrial policy subsidizing either the R&D or the continued operation of incumbents reduces growth and welfare. For example, a subsidy to incumbent R&D equivalent to 53 of GDP reduces welfare by about 1.53 because it deters entry of new high-type firms. On the contrary, substantial improvements (of the order of 53 improvement in welfare) are possible if the continued operation of incumbents is taxed while at the same time R&D by incumbents and new entrants is subsidized. This is because of a strong selection effect: R&D resources (skilled labor) are inefficiently used by low-type incumbent firms. Subsidies to incumbents encourage the survival and expansion of these firms at the expense of potential high-type entrants. We show that optimal policy encourages the exit of low-type firms and supports R&D by high-type incumbents and entry.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    INTRA-FIRM TRADE AND PRODUCT CONTRACTIBILITY

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-12

    This paper examines the determinants of intra-firm trade in U.S. imports using detailed country-product data. We create a new measure of product contractibility based on the degree of intermediation in international trade for the product. We find important roles for the interaction of country and product characteristics in determining intra-firm trade shares. Intra- firm trade is high for products with low levels of contractibility sourced from countries with weak governance, for skill-intensive products from skill-scarce countries, and for capital-intensive products from capital-abundant countries.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    More than a Million New American Indians in 2000: Who are They?

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-02

    Over a million people reported their race as American Indian in the 2000 U.S. Census but did not report that race in the 1990 Census. We investigate three questions related to this extraordinary population change: (1) Which subgroups of American Indians had the greatest numerical growth? (2) Which subgroups had the greatest proportional increase? And (3) is it plausible that all 'new' American Indians reported multiple races in 2000? We use full-count and high-density decennial U.S. census data; adjust for birth, death, and immigration; decompose on age, gender, Latino origin, education, and birth state; and compare the observed American Indian subgroup sizes in 2000 to the sizes expected based on 1990 counts. The largest numerical increases were among non-Latino youth (ages 10-19), non-Latino adult women, and adults with no college degree. Latinos, highly-educated adults, and women have the largest proportionate gains, perhaps indicating that 'American Indian' has special appeal in these groups. We also find evidence that a substantial number of new American Indians reported only American Indian race in 2000, rather than a multiple-race response. This research is relevant to social theorists, race scholars, community members, program evaluators, and the Census Bureau.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    University Innovation, Local Economic Growth, and Entrepreneurship

    June 2012

    Authors: Naomi Hausman

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-10

    Universities, often situated at the center of innovative clusters, are believed to be important drivers of local economic growth. This paper identifies the extent to which U.S. universities stimulate nearby economic activity using the interaction of a national shock to the spread of innovation from universities - the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 - with pre-determined variation both within a university in academic strengths and across universities in federal research funding. Using longitudinal establishment-level data from the Census, I find that longrun employment and payroll per worker around universities rise particularly rapidly after Bayh-Dole in industries more closely related to local university innovative strengths. The impact of university innovation increases with geographic proximity to the university. Counties surrounding universities that received more pre-Bayh-Dole federal funding - particularly from the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health - experienced faster employment growth after the law. Entering establishments - in particular multi-unit firm expansions - over the period from 1977 to 1997 were especially important in generating long-run employment growth, while incumbents experienced modest declines, consistent with creative destruction. Suggestive of their complementarities with universities, large establishments contributed more substantially to the total 20-year growth effect than did small establishments.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes

    June 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-09

    We model spatial clusters of similar firms. Our model highlights how agglomerative forces lead to localized, individual connections among firms, while interaction costs generate a defined distance over which attraction forces operate. Overlapping firm interactions yield agglomeration clusters that are much larger than the underlying agglomerative forces themselves. Empirically, we demonstrate that our model's assumptions are present in the structure of technology and labor flows within Silicon Valley and its surrounding areas. Our model further identifies how the lengths over which agglomerative forces operate influence the shapes and sizes of industrial clusters; we confirm these predictions using variations across both technology clusters and industry agglomeration.
    View Full Paper PDF