CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Total Factor Productivity'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 105

Center for Economic Studies - 89

Longitudinal Business Database - 88

North American Industry Classification System - 76

Ordinary Least Squares - 76

Census of Manufactures - 75

National Bureau of Economic Research - 68

Longitudinal Research Database - 67

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 66

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 64

Standard Industrial Classification - 60

National Science Foundation - 55

Cobb-Douglas - 53

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 42

Economic Census - 36

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 32

Federal Reserve Bank - 31

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 28

Internal Revenue Service - 28

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 27

Special Sworn Status - 25

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 24

Employer Identification Numbers - 22

Generalized Method of Moments - 21

TFPQ - 21

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 18

Federal Reserve System - 17

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

Business Register - 15

University of Chicago - 14

Business Dynamics Statistics - 14

Current Population Survey - 14

New York University - 14

Department of Economics - 14

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 13

Securities and Exchange Commission - 12

IQR - 12

TFPR - 12

Environmental Protection Agency - 12

World Bank - 12

Disclosure Review Board - 11

Federal Trade Commission - 11

American Economic Review - 11

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 10

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 10

Research Data Center - 10

Securities Data Company - 10

Boston College - 9

American Community Survey - 9

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Center for Research in Security Prices - 9

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 8

International Trade Research Report - 8

University of Maryland - 8

Labor Productivity - 8

Kauffman Foundation - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 8

Review of Economics and Statistics - 8

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 8

Boston Research Data Center - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

UC Berkeley - 7

Decennial Census - 7

Retirement History Survey - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Harmonized System - 7

Fabricated Metal Products - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Commodity Flow Survey - 7

Initial Public Offering - 6

University of California Los Angeles - 6

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 6

World Trade Organization - 6

Value Added - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 6

Foreign Direct Investment - 6

North American Industry Classi - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Political Economy - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Net Present Value - 6

PAOC - 6

COMPUSTAT - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Administrative Records - 6

Board of Governors - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Energy Information Administration - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 5

E32 - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

American Economic Association - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

University of Michigan - 5

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

European Union - 5

Review of Economic Studies - 5

MIT Press - 5

Northwestern University - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Hypothesis 2 - 4

Department of Homeland Security - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Princeton University - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Company Organization Survey - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

New York Times - 4

Princeton University Press - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Stanford University - 4

2SLS - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Journal of International Economics - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Columbia University - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

IBM - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Social Security Administration - 3

Social Security - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Public Administration - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

2010 Census - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

VAR - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Postal Service - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Harvard University - 3

Business Services - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Cornell University - 3

CAAA - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Heckscher-Ohlin - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

production - 103

manufacturing - 70

growth - 67

market - 60

produce - 56

investment - 54

macroeconomic - 53

econometric - 53

revenue - 51

expenditure - 48

sale - 45

industrial - 40

economist - 39

estimating - 39

economically - 39

efficiency - 38

demand - 36

recession - 36

labor - 35

productive - 34

acquisition - 34

gdp - 33

profit - 31

productivity growth - 28

company - 28

sector - 27

estimation - 25

monopolistic - 24

endogeneity - 24

merger - 24

earnings - 23

export - 22

depreciation - 22

employ - 21

technological - 21

innovation - 21

spillover - 21

industry productivity - 21

manufacturer - 20

plant productivity - 20

enterprise - 19

leverage - 19

firms productivity - 18

profitability - 18

productivity dispersion - 17

exporter - 17

aggregate - 16

productivity measures - 16

finance - 16

regression - 16

productivity plants - 16

quarterly - 15

financial - 15

incentive - 15

econometrician - 15

regulation - 15

organizational - 15

accounting - 14

inventory - 14

factor productivity - 14

factory - 14

rates productivity - 14

stock - 14

labor productivity - 14

equity - 13

aggregate productivity - 13

employed - 13

employee - 13

growth productivity - 13

corporate - 13

competitor - 13

acquirer - 13

statistical - 12

measures productivity - 12

workforce - 12

entrepreneurship - 12

investor - 12

patent - 12

takeover - 12

consumption - 12

cost - 12

multinational - 12

product - 12

debt - 11

payroll - 11

import - 11

technology - 11

productivity dynamics - 11

conglomerate - 11

heterogeneity - 11

gain - 11

endogenous - 11

producing - 11

dispersion productivity - 10

regress - 10

employment growth - 10

trend - 9

shareholder - 9

geographically - 9

shock - 9

investing - 9

invest - 9

industry concentration - 9

exogeneity - 9

tariff - 9

estimator - 9

spending - 9

emission - 9

pollution - 9

capital - 9

ownership - 9

estimates productivity - 8

productivity analysis - 8

exporting - 8

productivity estimates - 8

corporation - 8

firms plants - 8

plants industry - 8

subsidiary - 8

regulatory - 8

epa - 8

environmental - 8

strategic - 8

efficient - 8

plant - 8

profitable - 8

textile - 8

bank - 7

borrowing - 7

entrepreneur - 7

exported - 7

investment productivity - 7

productivity shocks - 7

innovating - 7

wages productivity - 7

plants firms - 7

externality - 7

level productivity - 7

monopolistically - 7

productivity differences - 7

establishment - 7

regulation productivity - 7

econometrically - 7

specialization - 7

manager - 7

yield - 7

analysis productivity - 7

declining - 7

exogenous - 7

bankruptcy - 7

quantity - 7

pricing - 7

commodity - 7

pollutant - 7

loan - 6

creditor - 6

average - 6

wholesale - 6

productivity distribution - 6

venture - 6

subsidy - 6

productivity capital - 6

productivity impacts - 6

innovate - 6

city - 6

relocation - 6

plant investment - 6

regional - 6

competitiveness - 6

reallocation productivity - 6

area - 6

equilibrium - 6

share - 6

regressing - 6

metropolitan - 6

price - 6

productivity size - 6

management - 6

productivity increases - 6

liquidation - 6

productivity firms - 6

trading - 6

fluctuation - 6

impact - 6

consumer - 6

financing - 6

performance - 6

diversification - 6

contract - 5

asset - 5

report - 5

respondent - 5

retailer - 5

sector productivity - 5

occupation - 5

productivity variation - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

technology adoption - 5

prospect - 5

innovation productivity - 5

innovative - 5

worker - 5

relocate - 5

salary - 5

rent - 5

plant employment - 5

industries estimate - 5

productivity wage - 5

wage growth - 5

estimates production - 5

agriculture - 5

observed productivity - 5

technical - 5

larger firms - 5

security - 5

capital productivity - 5

recessionary - 5

budget - 5

managerial - 5

lending - 5

lender - 5

rate - 5

utilization - 5

volatility - 5

mergers acquisitions - 5

restructuring - 5

outsourcing - 5

environmental regulation - 5

costs pollution - 5

pollution abatement - 5

owner - 5

industry variation - 5

refinery - 5

polluting - 5

fund - 4

disclosure - 4

tax - 4

imputation - 4

commerce - 4

data census - 4

survey - 4

employment effects - 4

layoff - 4

shipment - 4

regressors - 4

invention - 4

researcher - 4

innovator - 4

patenting - 4

incorporated - 4

oligopolistic - 4

region - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

country - 4

sectoral - 4

entry productivity - 4

downturn - 4

firms grow - 4

decline - 4

collateral - 4

estimates employment - 4

employment dynamics - 4

oligopoly - 4

bankrupt - 4

debtor - 4

expense - 4

buyer - 4

practices productivity - 4

forecast - 4

aggregation - 4

firms export - 4

exporting firms - 4

downstream - 4

good - 4

international trade - 4

regulated - 4

abatement expenditures - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

diversify - 4

data - 4

analysis - 4

borrow - 3

irs - 3

warehouse - 3

retail - 3

grocery - 3

percentile - 3

labor statistics - 3

manufacturing productivity - 3

state - 3

shift - 3

urban - 3

microdata - 3

relocating - 3

bias - 3

industry output - 3

labor markets - 3

geography - 3

regional economic - 3

local economic - 3

tech - 3

outsourced - 3

sourcing - 3

industry growth - 3

employment distribution - 3

hire - 3

trends labor - 3

employment production - 3

economic growth - 3

supplier - 3

energy - 3

autoregressive - 3

credit - 3

banking - 3

inflation - 3

heterogeneous - 3

hiring - 3

firms trade - 3

proprietor - 3

deviation - 3

model - 3

unobserved - 3

development - 3

customer - 3

analyst - 3

agency - 3

trade models - 3

workplace - 3

valuation - 3

economic census - 3

owning - 3

advantage - 3

diversified - 3

plants industries - 3

measure - 3

study - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 206


  • Working Paper

    CAPITAL AND LABOR REALLOCATION INSIDE FIRMS

    April 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-22

    We document how a plant-specific shock to investment opportunities at one plant of a firm ("treated plant") spills over to other plants of the same firm-but only if the firm is financially constrained. While the shock triggers an increase in investment and employment at the treated plant, this increase is offset by a decrease at other plants of the same magnitude, consistent with headquarters channeling scarce resources away from other plants and toward the treated plant. As a result of the resource reallocation, aggregate firm-wide productivity increases, suggesting that the reallocation is beneficial for the firm as a whole. We also show that-in order to provide the treated plant with scarce resources-headquarters does not uniformly "tax" all of the firm's other plants in the same way: It is more likely to take away resources from plants that are less productive, are not part of the firm's core industries, and are located far away from headquarters. We do not find any evidence of investment or employment spillovers at financially unconstrained firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Gains from Offshoring? Evidence from U.S. Microdata

    April 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-20

    We construct a new linked data set with over one thousand offshoring events by matching Trade Adjustment Assistance program petition data to micro-data from the U.S. Census Bureau. We exploit this data to assess how offshoring impacts domestic firm-level aggregate employment, output, wages and productivity. A class of models predicts that more productive firms engage in offshoring, and that this leads to gains in output and (measured) productivity, and potential gains in employment and wages, in the remaining domestic activities of the offshoring firm. Consistent with these models, we find that offshoring firms are on average larger and more productive compared to non-offshorers. However, we find that offshorers suffer from a large decline in employment (32 per cent) and output (28 per cent) relative to their peers even in the long run. Further, we find no significant change in average wages or in total factor productivity measures at affected firms. We find these results robust to a variety of checks. Thus we find no evidence for positive spillovers to the remaining domestic activity of firms in this large sampleof offshoring events.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    PRODUCTIVITY, RESTRUCTURING, AND THE GAINS FROM TAKEOVERS

    April 2013

    Authors: Xiaoyang Li

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-18

    This paper investigates how takeovers create value. Using plant-level data, I show that acquirers increase targets' productivity through more efficient use of capital and labor. Acquirers significantly reduce capital expenditures, wages, and employment in target plants, though output is unchanged. Acquirers improve targets'investment efficiency through better capital reallocation. Moreover, changes in productivity help explain the merging firms' announcement returns. The combined announcement returns are driven by improvements in target's productivity. Targets with greater productivity improvements receive higher premiums. These results provide some first empirical evidence on the relation between productivity and stock returns in the context of takeovers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Product Quality and Firm Heterogeneity in International Trade

    March 2013

    Authors: Antoine Gervais

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-08

    I develop and implement a methodology for obtaining plant-level estimates of product quality from revenue and physical output data. Intuitively, firms that sell large quantities of output conditional on price are classified as high quality producers. I use this method to decompose cross-plant variation in price and export status into a quality and an efficiency margin. The empirical results show that prices are increasing in quality and decreasing in efficiency. However, selection into exporting is driven mainly by quality. The finding that changes in quality and efficiency have different impact on the firm's export decision is shown to be inconsistent with the traditional iceberg trade cost formulation and points to the importance of per unit transport costs.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Reallocation and Technology: Evidence From The U.S. Steel Industry

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-06

    We measure the impact of a drastic new technology for producing steel -- the minimill -- on the aggregate productivity of U.S. steel producers, using unique plant-level data between 1963 and 2002. We find that the sharp increase in the industry's productivity is linked to this new technology, and operates through two distinct mechanisms. First, minimills displaced the older technology, called vertically integrated production, and this reallocation of output was responsible for a third of the increase in the industry's productivity. Second, increased competition, due to the expansion of minimills, drove a substantial reallocation process within the group of vertically integrated producers, driving a resurgence in their productivity, and consequently of the industry's productivity as a whole.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Evolving Property Rights and Shifting Organizational Forms: Evidence From Joint-Venture Buyouts Following China's WTO Accession

    March 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-05

    China's WTO accession offers a rare opportunity to observe multinationals' response to changes in property rights in a developing country. WTO accession reduced incentives for joint ventures while reducing constraints on wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. Concomitant with these changes was a more liberal investment environment for indigenous investors. An adaptation of Feenstra and Hanson's (2005) property rights model suggests that higher the productivity and value added of the joint venture, but the lower its domestic sales share, the more likely the venture is to be become wholly foreign owned following liberalization. Theory also suggests that an enterprise with lower productivity but higher value added and domestic sales will be more likely to switch from a joint venture to wholly domestic owned. Using newly created enterprise-level panel data on equity joint ventures and changes in registration type following China's WTO accession, we find evidence consistent with the property rights theory. More highly productive firms with higher value added and lower domestic sales shares are more likely to become wholly foreign owned, while less productive firms focused on the Chinese market are more likely to become wholly domestic owned rather than remain joint ventures. In addition to highlighting the importance of incomplete contracts and property rights in the international organization of production, these results support the view that external commitment to liberalization through WTO accession influences multinational and indigenous firms' behavior.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Are We Undercounting Reallocation's Contribution to Growth?

    January 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-55R

    There has been a strong surge in aggregate productivity growth in India since 1990, following significant economic reforms. Three recent studies have used two distinct methodologies to decompose the sources of growth, and all conclude that it has been driven by within-plant increases in technical efficiency and not between-plant reallocation of inputs. Given the nature of the reforms, where many barriers to input reallocation were removed, this finding has surprised researchers and been dubbed 'India's Mysterious Manufacturing Miracle.' In this paper, we show that the methodologies used may artificially understate the extent of reallocation. One approach, using growth in value added, counts all reallocation growth arising from the movement of intermediate inputs as technical efficiency growth. The second approach, using the Olley-Pakes decomposition, uses estimates of plant-level total factor productivity (TFP) as a proxy for the marginal product of inputs. However, in equilibrium, TFP and the marginal product of inputs are unrelated. Using microdata on manufacturing from five countries ' India, the U.S., Chile, Colombia, and Slovenia ' we show that both approaches significantly understate the true role of reallocation in economic growth. In particular, reallocation of materials is responsible for over half of aggregate Indian manufacturing productivity growth since 2000, substantially larger than either the contribution of primary inputs or the change in the covariance of productivity and size.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Management in America

    January 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-01

    The Census Bureau recently conducted a survey of management practices in over 30,000 plants across the US, the first large-scale survey of management in America. Analyzing these data reveals several striking results. First, more structured management practices are tightly linked to better performance: establishments adopting more structured practices for performance monitoring, target setting and incentives enjoy greater productivity and profitability, higher rates of innovation and faster employment growth. Second, there is a substantial dispersion of management practices across the establishments. We find that 18% of establishments have adopted at least 75% of these more structured management practices, while 27% of establishments adopted less than 50% of these. Third, more structured management practices are more likely to be found in establishments that export, who are larger (or are part of bigger firms), and have more educated employees. Establishments in the South and Midwest have more structured practices on average than those in the Northeast and West. Finally, we find adoption of structured management practices has increased between 2005 and 2010 for surviving establishments, particularly for those practices involving data collection and analysis.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico

    September 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-20

    In the U.S., the average 40 year old plant employs almost eight times as many workers as the typical plant five years or younger. In contrast, surviving Indian plants exhibit little growth in terms of either employment or output. Mexico is intermediate to India and the U.S. in these respects: the average 40 year old Mexican plant employs twice as many workers as an average new plant. This pattern holds across many industries and for formal and informal establishments alike. The divergence in plant dynamics suggests lower investments by Indian and Mexican plants in process efficiency, quality, and in accessing markets at home and abroad. In simple GE models, we find that the difference in life cycle dynamics could lower aggregate manufacturing productivity on the order of 25% in India and Mexico relative to the U.S.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Real Effects of Hedge Fund Activism: Productivity, Risk, and Product Market Competition

    July 2012

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-12-14

    This paper studies the long-term effect of hedge fund activism on the productivity of target firms using plant-level information from the U.S. Census Bureau. A typical target firm improves its production efficiency within two years after activism, and this improvement is concentrated in industries with a high degree of product market competition. By following plants that were sold post-intervention, we also find that efficient capital redeployment is an important channel via which activists create value. Furthermore, our analyses demonstrate that measuring performance using the Compustat data is likely to lead to a downward bias because target firms experiencing greater improvement post-intervention are also more likely to disappear from the Compustat database. Finally, consistent with recent work in asset-pricing linking firm investment decisions and expected returns, we show how changes to target firms' productivity are associated with a decline in systemic risk, particularly in competitive industries.
    View Full Paper PDF