CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'North American Industry Classification System'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Longitudinal Business Database - 240

Center for Economic Studies - 140

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 139

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 138

Standard Industrial Classification - 116

Internal Revenue Service - 110

Ordinary Least Squares - 103

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 102

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 101

Employer Identification Numbers - 101

National Science Foundation - 101

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 97

Economic Census - 97

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 92

Business Register - 89

National Bureau of Economic Research - 89

Total Factor Productivity - 78

Census of Manufactures - 74

Disclosure Review Board - 70

American Community Survey - 69

Business Dynamics Statistics - 62

Current Population Survey - 61

Census Bureau Business Register - 60

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 58

Federal Reserve Bank - 57

County Business Patterns - 56

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 52

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 49

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 45

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 42

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 42

Decennial Census - 38

Social Security Administration - 37

Research Data Center - 37

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 36

Protected Identification Key - 36

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 35

University of Chicago - 34

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 31

Special Sworn Status - 31

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 30

Cobb-Douglas - 30

Technical Services - 30

Service Annual Survey - 30

Social Security - 29

Federal Reserve System - 29

Social Security Number - 29

Department of Homeland Security - 27

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 27

Patent and Trademark Office - 26

Harmonized System - 26

Unemployment Insurance - 26

Retail Trade - 26

Longitudinal Research Database - 26

Wholesale Trade - 25

Accommodation and Food Services - 25

Office of Management and Budget - 24

American Economic Review - 24

Kauffman Foundation - 23

Department of Labor - 22

2010 Census - 22

Core Based Statistical Area - 22

Survey of Business Owners - 21

Employer Characteristics File - 21

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 21

Generalized Method of Moments - 21

International Trade Research Report - 21

Small Business Administration - 20

Annual Business Survey - 20

Company Organization Survey - 20

Individual Characteristics File - 20

Environmental Protection Agency - 20

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 20

North American Industry Classi - 20

W-2 - 19

Arts, Entertainment - 19

University of Maryland - 19

World Bank - 19

Securities and Exchange Commission - 18

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 18

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 17

World Trade Organization - 17

Occupational Employment Statistics - 17

Local Employment Dynamics - 17

Postal Service - 17

NBER Summer Institute - 16

Business Employment Dynamics - 16

Employment History File - 16

Cornell University - 16

Agriculture, Forestry - 15

Energy Information Administration - 15

Department of Economics - 15

Public Administration - 15

Journal of Economic Literature - 15

Boston College - 14

American Economic Association - 14

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 14

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

New York University - 14

Sloan Foundation - 14

Review of Economics and Statistics - 14

Department of Commerce - 14

Board of Governors - 13

University of Michigan - 13

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 13

Journal of Political Economy - 13

COVID-19 - 13

IQR - 13

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 13

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 13

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 13

Master Address File - 13

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 13

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 13

Business Services - 12

Educational Services - 12

Establishment Micro Properties - 12

United Nations - 12

University of California Los Angeles - 12

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 12

Office of Personnel Management - 12

LEHD Program - 12

Commodity Flow Survey - 12

Characteristics of Business Owners - 12

Health Care and Social Assistance - 12

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 12

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 12

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 12

Permanent Plant Number - 12

Department of Agriculture - 11

National Establishment Time Series - 11

Professional Services - 11

Current Employment Statistics - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Department of Energy - 11

Census of Retail Trade - 11

Initial Public Offering - 11

European Union - 11

Journal of Labor Economics - 11

Harvard Business School - 10

AKM - 10

Multiple Worksite Report - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 10

Oil and Gas Extraction - 10

Person Validation System - 10

United States Census Bureau - 10

Stanford University - 10

University of Toronto - 10

State Energy Data System - 10

Statistics Canada - 10

International Trade Commission - 9

Linear Probability Models - 9

Duke University - 9

Federal Trade Commission - 9

Limited Liability Company - 9

CDF - 9

Composite Person Record - 9

Cumulative Density Function - 9

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 9

Bureau of Labor - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Geographic Information Systems - 9

Labor Productivity - 9

Computer Network Use Supplement - 9

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 9

MIT Press - 9

Electronic Data Interchange - 9

Journal of International Economics - 9

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

General Accounting Office - 8

TFPQ - 8

Columbia University - 8

Guzman and Stern - 8

PSID - 8

Business Formation Statistics - 8

Department of Defense - 8

National Center for Health Statistics - 8

IBM - 8

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 8

Foreign Direct Investment - 8

Census Numident - 8

Economic Research Service - 8

Harvard University - 8

George Mason University - 8

American Housing Survey - 8

Review of Economic Studies - 8

Federal Tax Information - 8

Business Master File - 8

COVID - 7

Department of Justice - 7

Employer-Household Dynamics - 7

Census of Services - 7

Legal Form of Organization - 7

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 7

LODES - 7

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 7

Fabricated Metal Products - 7

Customs and Border Protection - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Probability Density Function - 7

COMPUSTAT - 7

International Standard Industrial Classification - 7

2SLS - 6

Federal Register - 6

Form W-2 - 6

TFPR - 6

Center for Research in Security Prices - 6

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 6

Supreme Court - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

National Employer Survey - 6

Nonemployer Statistics - 6

Federal Statistical System - 6

European Commission - 6

North American Free Trade Agreement - 6

Heckscher-Ohlin - 6

Net Present Value - 6

Retirement History Survey - 6

UC Berkeley - 6

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 6

Georgetown University - 6

Data Management System - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Kauffman Firm Survey - 6

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

New York Times - 6

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 6

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 5

University of California - 5

Research and Development - 5

Ohio State University - 5

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 5

IZA - 5

SSA Numident - 5

Code of Federal Regulations - 5

1940 Census - 5

Princeton University Press - 5

Northwestern University - 5

JOLTS - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Wal-Mart - 5

Cambridge University Press - 5

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 5

VAR - 4

University of Texas - 4

Social and Economic Supplement - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

MAF-ARF - 4

Health and Retirement Study - 4

Hypothesis 2 - 4

HHS - 4

E32 - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Carnegie Mellon University - 4

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Census Industry Code - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

DOB - 4

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

National Research Council - 4

University of Minnesota - 4

CAAA - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

PAOC - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

American Immigration Council - 3

Russell Sage Foundation - 3

ASEC - 3

Value Added - 3

Housing and Urban Development - 3

Social Science Research Institute - 3

Department of State - 3

Penn State University - 3

Princeton University - 3

Washington University - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Journal of Human Resources - 3

Indian Health Service - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

National Academy of Sciences - 3

Securities Data Company - 3

Administrative Records - 3

Stern School of Business - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

WECD - 3

John Haltiwanger - 32

Lucia Foster - 25

Javier Miranda - 21

Ron Jarmin - 17

Lars Vilhuber - 16

Emin Dinlersoz - 14

Nathan Goldschlag - 13

Catherine Buffington - 11

John M. Abowd - 11

Martha Stinson - 10

Fariha Kamal - 10

Cheryl Grim - 10

Peter Schott - 10

Zoltan Wolf - 9

Erik Brynjolfsson - 8

Henry Hyatt - 8

Teresa C. Fort - 8

Kevin L. McKinney - 8

Shawn Klimek - 8

Zachary Kroff - 7

Nicholas Bloom - 7

Nikolas Zolas - 7

Gale Boyd - 7

J. David Brown - 7

Stephen Redding - 7

G. Jacob Blackwood - 6

J. Daniel Kim - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Christopher Goetz - 6

Matthias Kehrig - 6

Scott Ohlmacher - 6

Erika McEntarfer - 6

Jerome P. Reiter - 6

Xavier Giroud - 6

Moises Yi - 5

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 5

Kristin Sandusky - 5

Steven J. Davis - 5

John S. Earle - 5

Ronald J Shadbegian - 5

Justin Pierce - 5

David L. Rigby - 5

Thomas Kemeny - 5

Abigail Cooke - 5

C.J. Krizan - 5

J. Bradford Jensen - 5

Randy Becker - 5

Robert Seamans - 4

Emek Basker - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Lawrence Warren - 4

Matthew R. Graham - 4

Mark J. Kutzbach - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Matthew Doolin - 4

James R. Spletzer - 4

Nicolas Vincent - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Alice Zawacki - 4

Ian M. Schmutte - 4

Andrew S. Green - 4

Kevin Rinz - 4

Benjamin Pugsley - 4

Kristin McCue - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

B.K. Atrostic - 4

J. Frank Li - 3

Lee Tucker - 3

Kathryn Bonney - 3

Cory Breaux - 3

David Card - 3

Jesse Rothstein - 3

Joseph Staudt - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Rachel Nesbit - 3

Maggie R. Jones - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Kyle Handley - 3

Timothy R. Wojan - 3

Stephen Tibbets - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Timothy Dunne - 3

Itay Saporta-Eksten - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Wei Ouyang - 3

Hyunseob Kim - 3

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 3

Mariko Sakakibara - 3

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Matthew D. Shapiro - 3

John J. Stevens - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Satkartar K. Kinney - 3

Holger M. Mueller - 3

Bryce Stephens - 3

Sang V Nguyen - 3

employ - 90

employed - 89

manufacturing - 87

market - 87

workforce - 85

labor - 83

industrial - 75

sector - 74

macroeconomic - 73

growth - 69

production - 67

employee - 63

revenue - 63

econometric - 62

recession - 62

payroll - 60

enterprise - 60

sale - 58

gdp - 57

entrepreneurship - 53

earnings - 53

investment - 52

company - 52

expenditure - 51

export - 51

estimating - 50

economist - 49

entrepreneur - 48

economically - 46

innovation - 44

survey - 43

demand - 38

agency - 34

quarterly - 34

organizational - 34

establishment - 34

worker - 34

manufacturer - 31

venture - 31

report - 31

exporter - 30

employment growth - 29

patent - 29

endogeneity - 28

import - 28

entrepreneurial - 27

aggregate - 27

occupation - 27

acquisition - 27

hiring - 26

technological - 26

job - 26

trend - 26

finance - 25

spillover - 24

statistical - 24

monopolistic - 23

workplace - 23

produce - 23

financial - 22

heterogeneity - 22

incorporated - 22

estimation - 22

wholesale - 22

proprietor - 21

earner - 21

census employment - 21

multinational - 21

disclosure - 21

salary - 21

proprietorship - 21

investor - 20

efficiency - 20

employment statistics - 20

inventory - 20

data - 20

incentive - 19

corporation - 19

patenting - 19

census bureau - 19

respondent - 19

accounting - 18

profit - 18

tariff - 18

microdata - 18

corporate - 17

productive - 17

data census - 17

employment data - 17

technology - 16

labor statistics - 16

warehousing - 16

regress - 16

unemployed - 16

specialization - 16

trading - 16

immigrant - 16

productivity growth - 16

metropolitan - 16

hire - 15

irs - 15

longitudinal - 15

commerce - 15

exporting - 15

census data - 15

importer - 15

competitor - 15

innovate - 15

employment dynamics - 15

population - 14

startup - 14

exogeneity - 14

record - 14

retailer - 14

retail - 14

commodity - 14

impact - 14

innovative - 14

leverage - 14

regional - 14

labor productivity - 14

ethnicity - 14

industry productivity - 14

minority - 13

founder - 13

merger - 13

economic census - 13

stock - 13

consumption - 13

geographically - 13

datasets - 13

investing - 12

equity - 12

invest - 12

socioeconomic - 12

declining - 12

decline - 12

estimates employment - 12

region - 12

profitability - 12

diversification - 12

subsidiary - 12

shipment - 12

relocation - 12

research census - 12

growth productivity - 12

factory - 12

researcher - 12

emission - 12

monopolistically - 11

shock - 11

oligopolistic - 11

invention - 11

layoff - 11

database - 11

immigration - 11

outsourced - 11

outsourcing - 11

epa - 11

employment estimates - 11

cost - 11

funding - 10

unemployment rates - 10

disparity - 10

employment count - 10

strategic - 10

turnover - 10

tenure - 10

exported - 10

earn - 10

work census - 10

country - 10

labor markets - 10

price - 10

sourcing - 10

financing - 10

subsidy - 10

area - 10

development - 10

industry wages - 10

rent - 10

industry concentration - 10

consumer - 10

business data - 10

hispanic - 9

discrimination - 9

tax - 9

federal - 9

debt - 9

depreciation - 9

regression - 9

productivity dispersion - 9

regressing - 9

econometrician - 9

good - 9

innovating - 9

opportunity - 9

information census - 9

international trade - 9

firms export - 9

imported - 9

census survey - 9

competitiveness - 9

prospect - 9

wages productivity - 9

ownership - 9

decade - 9

sectoral - 9

imputation - 9

employing - 9

energy - 9

productivity measures - 9

ethnic - 9

regulation - 9

coverage - 9

employer household - 9

longitudinal employer - 9

productivity estimates - 9

union - 8

average - 8

spending - 8

industry employment - 8

trends employment - 8

innovator - 8

housing - 8

aggregation - 8

corp - 8

patented - 8

fuel - 8

reporting - 8

warehouse - 8

nonemployer businesses - 8

censuses surveys - 8

employee data - 8

effect wages - 8

employment earnings - 8

loan - 8

rural - 8

wage growth - 8

bank - 8

product - 8

research - 8

firms trade - 8

firms grow - 8

residential - 8

firms productivity - 8

migrant - 8

supplier - 8

geography - 8

analysis - 8

regional economic - 8

use census - 8

pollution - 8

retirement - 7

census business - 7

2010 census - 7

filing - 7

employment trends - 7

unobserved - 7

shift - 7

foreign - 7

merchandise - 7

trader - 7

innovation patenting - 7

migration - 7

relocate - 7

executive - 7

measures productivity - 7

rates employment - 7

technology adoption - 7

importing - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

developed - 7

firms young - 7

custom - 7

firms import - 7

acquirer - 7

electricity - 7

state - 7

employment wages - 7

larger firms - 7

city - 7

firm dynamics - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

expense - 7

startup firms - 7

study - 7

worker demographics - 7

geographic - 7

healthcare - 7

manager - 7

industries estimate - 7

management - 7

workforce indicators - 7

agriculture - 7

businesses census - 7

statistician - 7

insurance - 7

environmental - 7

fund - 6

institutional - 6

earnings employees - 6

career - 6

marketing - 6

bias - 6

measures employment - 6

segregation - 6

neighborhood - 6

welfare - 6

compensation - 6

consolidated - 6

department - 6

store - 6

productivity analysis - 6

firms patents - 6

firm innovation - 6

disadvantaged - 6

younger firms - 6

growth employment - 6

globalization - 6

woman - 6

endogenous - 6

firms size - 6

conglomerate - 6

business startups - 6

pricing - 6

productivity increases - 6

wage differences - 6

renewable - 6

downturn - 6

productivity wage - 6

share - 6

lending - 6

recession employment - 6

clerical - 6

health insurance - 6

buyer - 6

confidentiality - 6

inference - 6

volatility - 6

estimator - 6

asset - 5

pension - 5

census disclosure - 5

employment declines - 5

earnings workers - 5

lender - 5

creditor - 5

analyst - 5

productivity variation - 5

state employment - 5

employment distribution - 5

forecast - 5

diversified - 5

entry productivity - 5

employment flows - 5

wage gap - 5

associate - 5

sector productivity - 5

businesses grow - 5

effects employment - 5

recessionary - 5

risk - 5

disaster - 5

hurricane - 5

regressors - 5

patents firms - 5

firm patenting - 5

native - 5

patenting firms - 5

wage regressions - 5

firms employment - 5

banking - 5

factor productivity - 5

location - 5

worker wages - 5

workers earnings - 5

contract - 5

plant investment - 5

level productivity - 5

residence - 5

industry growth - 5

reallocation productivity - 5

immigrant entrepreneurs - 5

wage effects - 5

premium - 5

borrowing - 5

wealth - 5

energy prices - 5

energy efficiency - 5

matching - 5

medicare - 5

classified - 5

classification - 5

productivity size - 5

productivity firms - 5

manufacturing productivity - 5

econometrically - 5

saving - 5

shareholder - 5

industrialized - 5

computer - 5

regulatory - 5

efficient - 5

insured - 5

firms census - 5

aging - 5

fluctuation - 5

information - 5

privacy - 5

statistical disclosure - 5

trade models - 5

model - 5

foreign trade - 5

pollutant - 5

plants industry - 5

polluting - 5

retailing - 5

racial - 4

mandate - 4

restaurant - 4

establishments data - 4

employment firms - 4

liquidation - 4

productivity capital - 4

productivity distribution - 4

unemployment insurance - 4

startups employees - 4

segregated - 4

poverty - 4

impact employment - 4

exporters multinationals - 4

exports countries - 4

university - 4

customer - 4

sample census - 4

dispersion productivity - 4

wages employment - 4

employment unemployment - 4

assessed - 4

advancement - 4

export market - 4

prevalence - 4

oligopoly - 4

rates productivity - 4

indian - 4

firms age - 4

employment production - 4

productivity shocks - 4

mortgage - 4

relocating - 4

migrate - 4

immigrant workers - 4

exporting firms - 4

multinational firms - 4

midwest - 4

diversify - 4

imputed - 4

estimates production - 4

increase employment - 4

taxation - 4

urban - 4

firm growth - 4

growth firms - 4

substitute - 4

advantage - 4

competitive - 4

industry variation - 4

plant productivity - 4

wage industries - 4

transition - 4

electricity prices - 4

earnings inequality - 4

managerial - 4

utilization - 4

industrial classification - 4

productivity differences - 4

tech - 4

census use - 4

employment measures - 4

agricultural - 4

trends labor - 4

employment recession - 4

economic statistics - 4

enrollment - 4

insurance coverage - 4

surveys censuses - 4

census research - 4

linked census - 4

productivity plants - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

publicly - 4

regional industry - 4

costs pollution - 4

pollution abatement - 4

regional industries - 4

endowment - 3

black - 3

wage variation - 3

wage earnings - 3

bankruptcy - 3

bankrupt - 3

debtor - 3

quantity - 3

deviation - 3

generation - 3

intergenerational - 3

parental - 3

renter - 3

taxable - 3

graduate - 3

fiscal - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

grocery - 3

provided census - 3

employed census - 3

downstream - 3

trade costs - 3

security - 3

productivity impacts - 3

industry heterogeneity - 3

borrower - 3

partnership - 3

migrating - 3

poorer - 3

job growth - 3

policymakers - 3

capital productivity - 3

plants firms - 3

externality - 3

resident - 3

enforcement - 3

wage data - 3

discrepancy - 3

wage changes - 3

pandemic - 3

recession exposure - 3

classifying - 3

policy - 3

equilibrium - 3

local economic - 3

takeover - 3

technical - 3

franchising - 3

rurality - 3

innovation productivity - 3

elasticity - 3

census years - 3

mexican - 3

business survival - 3

gender - 3

indicator - 3

exogenous - 3

investment productivity - 3

earnings growth - 3

export growth - 3

citizen - 3

census file - 3

inflation - 3

imputation model - 3

mobility - 3

commute - 3

restructuring - 3

locality - 3

supermarket - 3

refugee - 3

performance - 3

latino - 3

valuation - 3

firms exporting - 3

employment changes - 3

coverage employer - 3

statistical agencies - 3

environmental regulation - 3

abatement expenditures - 3

environmental expenditures - 3

capital - 3

cluster - 3

purchase - 3

Viewing papers 101 through 110 of 390


  • Working Paper

    Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers' Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-58

    This paper provides evidence from the US and Denmark that managers with a business degree ('business managers") reduce their employees' wages. Within five years of the appointment of a business manager, wages decline by 6% and the labor share by 5 percentage points in the US, and by 3% and 3 percentage points in Denmark. Firms appointing business managers are not on differential trends and do not enjoy higher output, investment, or employment growth thereafter. Using manager retirements and deaths and an IV strategy based on the diffusion of the practice of appointing business managers within industry, region and size quartile cells, we provide additional evidence that these are causal effects. We establish that the proximate cause of these (relative) wage effects are changes in rent-sharing practices following the appointment of business managers. Exploiting exogenous export demand shocks, we show that non-business managers share profits with their workers, whereas business managers do not. But consistent with our first set of results, these business managers show no greater ability to increase sales or profits in response to exporting opportunities. Finally, we use the influence of role models on college major choice to instrument for the decision to enroll in a business degree in Denmark and show that our estimates correspond to causal effects of practices and values acquired in business education--rather than the differential selection into business education of individuals unlikely to share rents with workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Dynamics Statistics for Single-Unit Firms

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-57

    The Business Dynamics Statistics of Single Unit Firms (BDS-SU) is an experimental data product that provides information on employment and payroll dynamics for each quarter of the year at businesses that operate in one physical location. This paper describes the creation of the data tables and the value they add to the existing Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) product. We then present some analysis of the published statistics to provide context for the numbers and demonstrate how they can be used to understand both national and local business conditions, with a particular focus on 2020 and the recession induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. We next examine how firms fared in this recession compared to the Great Recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2007. We also consider the heterogenous impact of the pandemic on various industries and areas of the country, showing which types of businesses in which locations were particularly hard hit. We examine business exit rates in some detail and consider why different metro areas experienced the pandemic in different ways. We also consider entry rates and look for evidence of a surge in new businesses as seen in other data sources. We finish by providing a preview of on-going research to match the BDS to worker demographics and show statistics on the relationship between the characteristics of the firm's workers and outcomes such as firm exit and net job creation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Investment and Subjective Uncertainty

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-52

    A longstanding challenge in evaluating the impact of uncertainty on investment is obtaining measures of managers' subjective uncertainty. We address this challenge by using a detailed new survey measure of subjective uncertainty collected by the U.S. Census Bureau for approximately 25,000 manufacturing plants. We find three key results. First, investment is strongly and robustly negatively associated with higher uncertainty, with a two standard deviation increase in uncertainty associated with about a 6% reduction in investment. Second, uncertainty is also negatively related to employment growth and overall shipments (sales) growth, which highlights the damaging impact of uncertainty on firm growth. Third, flexible inputs like rental capital and temporary workers show a positive relationship to uncertainty, demonstrating that businesses switch from less flexible to more flexible factor inputs at higher levels of uncertainty.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Snapshot Documentation, Release S2021_R2022Q4

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-51

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data at the U.S. Census Bureau is a quarterly database of linked employer-employee data covering over 95% of employment in the United States. These data are used to produce a number of public-use tabulations and tools, including the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), Job-to-Job Flows (J2J), and Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes (PSEO) data products. Researchers on approved projects may also access the underlying LEHD microdata directly, in the form of the LEHD Snapshot restricted-use data product. This document provides a detailed overview of the LEHD Snapshot as of release S2021_R2022Q4, including user guidance, variable codebooks, and an overview of the approvals needed to obtain access. Updates to the documentation for this and future snapshot releases will be made available in HTML format on the LEHD website.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Exploring New Ways to Classify Industries for Energy Analysis and Modeling

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-49

    Combustion, other emitting processes and fossil energy use outside the power sector have become urgent concerns given the United States' commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Industry is an important end user of energy and relies on fossil fuels used directly for process heating and as feedstocks for a diverse range of applications. Fuel and energy use by industry is heterogeneous, meaning even a single product group can vary broadly in its production routes and associated energy use. In the United States, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) serves as the standard for statistical data collection and reporting. In turn, data based on NAICS are the foundation of most United States energy modeling. Thus, the effectiveness of NAICS at representing energy use is a limiting condition for current expansive planning to improve energy efficiency and alternatives to fossil fuels in industry. Facility-level data could be used to build more detail into heterogeneous sectors and thus supplement data from Bureau of the Census and U.S Energy Information Administration reporting at NAICS code levels but are scarce. This work explores alternative classification schemes for industry based on energy use characteristics and validates an approach to estimate facility-level energy use from publicly available greenhouse gas emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The approaches in this study can facilitate understanding of current, as well as possible future, energy demand. First, current approaches to the construction of industrial taxonomies are summarized along with their usefulness for industrial energy modeling. Unsupervised machine learning techniques are then used to detect clusters in data reported from the U.S. Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Center program. Clusters of Industrial Assessment Center data show similar levels of correlation between energy use and explanatory variables as three-digit NAICS codes. Interestingly, the clusters each include a large cross section of NAICS codes, which lends additional support to the idea that NAICS may not be particularly suited for correlation between energy use and the variables studied. Fewer clusters are needed for the same level of correlation as shown in NAICS codes. Initial assessment shows a reasonable level of separation using support vector machines with higher than 80% accuracy, so machine learning approaches may be promising for further analysis. The IAC data is focused on smaller and medium-sized facilities and is biased toward higher energy users for a given facility type. Cladistics, an approach for classification developed in biology, is adapted to energy and process characteristics of industries. Cladistics applied to industrial systems seeks to understand the progression of organizations and technology as a type of evolution, wherein traits are inherited from previous systems but evolve due to the emergence of inventions and variations and a selection process driven by adaptation to pressures and favorable outcomes. A cladogram is presented for evolutionary directions in the iron and steel sector. Cladograms are a promising tool for constructing scenarios and summarizing directions of sectoral innovation. The cladogram of iron and steel is based on the drivers of energy use in the sector. Phylogenetic inference is similar to machine learning approaches as it is based on a machine-led search of the solution space, therefore avoiding some of the subjectivity of other classification systems. Our prototype approach for constructing an industry cladogram is based on process characteristics according to the innovation framework derived from Schumpeter to capture evolution in a given sector. The resulting cladogram represents a snapshot in time based on detailed study of process characteristics. This work could be an important tool for the design of scenarios for more detailed modeling. Cladograms reveal groupings of emerging or dominant processes and their implications in a way that may be helpful for policymakers and entrepreneurs, allowing them to see the larger picture, other good ideas, or competitors. Constructing a cladogram could be a good first step to analysis of many industries (e.g. nitrogenous fertilizer production, ethyl alcohol manufacturing), to understand their heterogeneity, emerging trends, and coherent groupings of related innovations. Finally, validation is performed for facility-level energy estimates from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Facility-level data availability continues to be a major challenge for industrial modeling. The method outlined by (McMillan et al. 2016; McMillan and Ruth 2019) allows estimating of facility level energy use based on mandatory greenhouse gas reporting. The validation provided here is an important step for further use of this data for industrial energy modeling.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The U.S. Manufacturing Sector's Response to Higher Electricity Prices: Evidence from State-Level Renewable Portfolio Standards

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-47

    While several papers examine the effects of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) on electricity prices, they mainly rely on state-level data and there has been little research on how RPS policies affect manufacturing activity via their effect on electricity prices. Using plant-level data for the entire U.S. manufacturing sector and all electric utilities from 1992 ' 2015, we jointly estimate the effect of RPS adoption and stringency on plant-level electricity prices and production decisions. To ensure that our results are not sensitive to possible pre-existing differences across manufacturing plants in RPS and non-RPS states, we implement coarsened exact covariate matching. Our results suggest that electricity prices for plants in RPS states averaged about 2% higher than in non-RPS states, notably lower than prior estimates based on state-level data. In response to these higher electricity prices, we estimate that plant electricity usage declined by 1.2% for all plants and 1.8% for energy-intensive plants, broadly consistent with published estimates of the elasticity of electricity demand for industrial users. We find smaller declines in output, employment, and hours worked (relative to the decline in electricity use). Finally, several key RPS policy design features that vary substantially from state-to-state produce heterogeneous effects on plant-level electricity prices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    An Examination of the Informational Value of Self-Reported Innovation Questions

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-46

    Self-reported innovation measures provide an alternative means for examining the economic performance of firms or regions. While European researchers have been exploiting the data from the Community Innovation Survey for over two decades, uptake of US innovation data has been much slower. This paper uses a restricted innovation survey designed to differentiate incremental innovators from more far-ranging innovators and compares it to responses in the Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs (ASE) and the Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) to examine the informational value of these positive innovation measures. The analysis begins by examining the association between the incremental innovation measure in the Rural Establishment Innovation Survey (REIS) and a measure of the inter-industry buying and selling complexity. A parallel analysis using BRDIS and ASE reveals such an association may vary among surveys, providing additional insight on the informational value of various innovation profiles available in self-reported innovation surveys.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Drives Stagnation: Monopsony or Monopoly?

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-45

    Wages for the vast majority of workers have stagnated since the 1980s while productivity has grown. We investigate two coexisting explanations based on rising market power: 1. Monopsony, where dominant firms exploit the limited mobility of their own workers to pay lower wages; and 2. Monopoly, where dominant firms charge too high prices for what they sell, which lowers production and the demand for labor, and hence equilibrium wages economy-wide. Using establishment data from the US Census Bureau between 1997 and 2016, we find evidence of both monopoly and monopsony, where the former is rising over this period and the latter is stable. Both contribute to the decoupling of productivity and wage growth, with monopoly being the primary determinant: in 2016 monopoly accounts for 75% of wage stagnation, monopsony for 25%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Opening the Black Box: Task and Skill Mix and Productivity Dispersion

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-44

    An important gap in most empirical studies of establishment-level productivity is the limited information about workers' characteristics and their tasks. Skill-adjusted labor input measures have been shown to be important for aggregate productivity measurement. Moreover, the theoretical literature on differences in production technologies across businesses increasingly emphasizes the task content of production. Our ultimate objective is to open this black box of tasks and skills at the establishment-level by combining establishment-level data on occupations from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) with a restricted-access establishment-level productivity dataset created by the BLS-Census Bureau Collaborative Micro-productivity Project. We take a first step toward this objective by exploring the conceptual, specification, and measurement issues to be confronted. We provide suggestive empirical analysis of the relationship between within-industry dispersion in productivity and tasks and skills. We find that within-industry productivity dispersion is strongly positively related to within-industry task/skill dispersion.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trade Liberalization and Labor-Market Outcomes: Evidence from US Matched Employer-Employee Data

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-42

    We use matched employer-employee data to examine outcomes among workers initially employed within and outside manufacturing after trade liberalization with China. We find that exposure to this shock operates predominantly through workers' counties (versus industries), that larger own industry and downstream exposure typically reduce relative earnings, and that greater upstream exposure often raises them. The latter is particularly important outside manufacturing: while we find substantial and persistent predicted declines in relative earnings among manufacturing workers, those outside manufacturing are generally predicted to experience relative earnings gains. Investigation of employment reactions indicates they account for a small share of the earnings effect.
    View Full Paper PDF