CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Longitudinal Business Database'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

North American Industry Classification System - 240

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 145

Center for Economic Studies - 132

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 130

Employer Identification Numbers - 113

Internal Revenue Service - 112

Standard Industrial Classification - 112

National Science Foundation - 106

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 101

Ordinary Least Squares - 100

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 99

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 98

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 97

National Bureau of Economic Research - 96

Total Factor Productivity - 91

Business Register - 89

Economic Census - 87

Business Dynamics Statistics - 79

Census of Manufactures - 75

Census Bureau Business Register - 70

Disclosure Review Board - 67

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 64

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 63

Federal Reserve Bank - 62

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 62

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 56

Current Population Survey - 55

American Community Survey - 52

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 50

County Business Patterns - 48

Social Security Administration - 40

Special Sworn Status - 40

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 39

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 39

Kauffman Foundation - 38

Patent and Trademark Office - 37

Department of Homeland Security - 36

Research Data Center - 34

Decennial Census - 33

International Trade Research Report - 33

Longitudinal Research Database - 33

University of Chicago - 33

Cobb-Douglas - 31

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 31

Service Annual Survey - 31

University of Maryland - 30

Federal Reserve System - 29

Survey of Business Owners - 29

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 29

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 28

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 28

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 26

Retail Trade - 26

Small Business Administration - 25

Social Security - 25

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 25

World Bank - 25

Department of Labor - 23

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 23

Wholesale Trade - 23

Securities and Exchange Commission - 22

Protected Identification Key - 22

Company Organization Survey - 21

Department of Economics - 21

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 21

Social Security Number - 21

World Trade Organization - 20

Technical Services - 20

W-2 - 20

Initial Public Offering - 20

New York University - 19

Business Employment Dynamics - 18

Office of Management and Budget - 18

Harmonized System - 17

Cornell University - 17

Individual Characteristics File - 17

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 17

Board of Governors - 16

Annual Business Survey - 16

University of Michigan - 16

Census of Retail Trade - 16

Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics - 16

Postal Service - 16

Accommodation and Food Services - 16

Employer Characteristics File - 15

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 15

Center for Research in Security Prices - 15

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

Unemployment Insurance - 15

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 15

Characteristics of Business Owners - 15

Generalized Method of Moments - 15

Employment History File - 15

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 14

General Accounting Office - 14

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 14

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 14

American Economic Association - 14

Local Employment Dynamics - 14

American Economic Review - 14

Boston College - 13

2010 Census - 13

Department of Agriculture - 13

NBER Summer Institute - 13

European Union - 13

Energy Information Administration - 13

Occupational Employment Statistics - 13

Arts, Entertainment - 13

Core Based Statistical Area - 13

COMPUSTAT - 13

University of California Los Angeles - 13

Review of Economics and Statistics - 13

Business Services - 12

Establishment Micro Properties - 12

COVID-19 - 12

IQR - 12

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 12

Foreign Direct Investment - 12

Public Administration - 12

Journal of Economic Literature - 12

North American Industry Classi - 12

Linear Probability Models - 11

National Establishment Time Series - 11

Federal Trade Commission - 11

Guzman and Stern - 11

Limited Liability Company - 11

Labor Productivity - 11

National Income and Product Accounts - 11

Stanford University - 11

IBM - 11

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 11

Kauffman Firm Survey - 11

Retirement History Survey - 11

Bureau of Labor - 11

Harvard University - 11

Permanent Plant Number - 11

Department of Commerce - 10

Customs and Border Protection - 10

Harvard Business School - 10

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 10

TFPQ - 10

Business Formation Statistics - 10

Department of Energy - 10

Standard Occupational Classification - 10

Health Care and Social Assistance - 10

University of Toronto - 10

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 10

Federal Register - 9

Agriculture, Forestry - 9

Columbia University - 9

Journal of Political Economy - 9

Professional Services - 9

New York Times - 9

Sloan Foundation - 9

Business Register Bridge - 9

Statistics Canada - 9

State Energy Data System - 9

Duke University - 9

European Commission - 8

International Trade Commission - 8

Council of Economic Advisers - 8

Current Employment Statistics - 8

Office of Personnel Management - 8

University of California - 8

National Institutes of Health - 8

National Employer Survey - 8

Legal Form of Organization - 8

Hypothesis 2 - 8

Educational Services - 8

Census Numident - 8

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 8

Data Management System - 8

George Mason University - 8

North American Free Trade Agreement - 8

Journal of International Economics - 8

2SLS - 7

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 7

TFPR - 7

Department of Justice - 7

University of Texas - 7

Employer-Household Dynamics - 7

Person Validation System - 7

Nonemployer Statistics - 7

United States Census Bureau - 7

Ohio State University - 7

Paycheck Protection Program - 7

VAR - 7

E32 - 7

Net Present Value - 7

Census of Services - 7

Federal Tax Information - 7

Northwestern University - 7

University of Minnesota - 7

Journal of Labor Economics - 7

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 7

Securities Data Company - 7

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 7

Chicago RDC - 7

Wal-Mart - 7

Supreme Court - 6

Oil and Gas Extraction - 6

National Center for Health Statistics - 6

CAAA - 6

AKM - 6

IZA - 6

Princeton University - 6

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 6

Labor Turnover Survey - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Master Address File - 6

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 6

CDF - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

MIT Press - 6

Business Master File - 6

Department of State - 5

Disability Insurance - 5

Research and Development - 5

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 5

Federal Statistical System - 5

HHS - 5

Washington University - 5

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 5

Georgetown University - 5

LEHD Program - 5

Successor Predecessor File - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Probability Density Function - 5

Computer Network Use Supplement - 5

United Nations - 5

National Academy of Sciences - 5

Commodity Flow Survey - 5

PSID - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Form W-2 - 4

Multiple Worksite Report - 4

COVID - 4

UC Berkeley - 4

Department of Health and Human Services - 4

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 4

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 4

Housing and Urban Development - 4

American Immigration Council - 4

Insurance Information Institute - 4

Economic Research Service - 4

Code of Federal Regulations - 4

Indian Health Service - 4

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 4

JOLTS - 4

1940 Census - 4

Society of Labor Economists - 4

Stern School of Business - 4

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 4

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 4

Person Identification Validation System - 4

Personally Identifiable Information - 4

Yale University - 4

National Institute on Aging - 4

National Opinion Research Center - 4

Composite Person Record - 4

DOB - 4

National Research Council - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

BLS Handbook of Methods - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Census 2000 - 4

Administrative Records - 4

American Housing Survey - 4

Fabricated Metal Products - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 4

New England County Metropolitan - 4

Earned Income Tax Credit - 3

ASEC - 3

Maximum Likelihood Estimation - 3

Toxics Release Inventory - 3

LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics - 3

Health and Retirement Study - 3

Value Added - 3

Brookings Institution - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

Detailed Earnings Records - 3

Review of Economic Studies - 3

Princeton University Press - 3

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 3

Electronic Data Interchange - 3

Journal of Econometrics - 3

Penn State University - 3

Boston Research Data Center - 3

John Haltiwanger - 41

Lucia Foster - 30

Ron Jarmin - 26

Javier Miranda - 25

Emin Dinlersoz - 19

Nathan Goldschlag - 17

Fariha Kamal - 13

Cheryl Grim - 12

Martha Stinson - 11

William Kerr - 11

Henry Hyatt - 10

Teresa C. Fort - 10

J. David Brown - 10

Zoltan Wolf - 9

Shawn Klimek - 9

Emek Basker - 8

Erik Brynjolfsson - 8

J. Daniel Kim - 8

Catherine Buffington - 8

Peter Schott - 8

Nikolas Zolas - 8

C.J. Krizan - 8

John S. Earle - 7

Erika McEntarfer - 7

Xavier Giroud - 7

Natarajan Balasubramanian - 7

G. Jacob Blackwood - 6

Cristina Tello-Trillo - 6

Jay Stewart - 6

Zachary Kroff - 6

Steven J. Davis - 6

Nicholas Bloom - 6

Rebecca Zarutskie - 6

Paige Ouimet - 6

Benjamin Pugsley - 6

Lars Vilhuber - 6

Christopher Goetz - 5

Tania Babina - 5

John M. Abowd - 5

Timothy Dunne - 5

Hyunseob Kim - 5

Mariko Sakakibara - 5

Kristin McCue - 5

Nuri Ersahin - 5

Joseph Staudt - 4

Cindy Cunningham - 4

Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia - 4

Kristin Sandusky - 4

Kristina McElheran - 4

Randall Akee - 4

Sabrina T. Howell - 4

Kyle Handley - 4

Adela Luque - 4

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman - 4

Chen Yeh - 4

Jerome P. Reiter - 4

Ufuk Akcigit - 4

Kevin L. McKinney - 4

Justin Pierce - 4

Holger M. Mueller - 4

Scott Ohlmacher - 4

Peter J. Klenow - 4

Matthias Kehrig - 4

J. Bradford Jensen - 4

Andrew Bernard - 4

Jagadeesh Sivadasan - 4

Robert Seamans - 3

J. Frank Li - 3

Yueyuan Ma - 3

Dominic A. Smith - 3

Cody Tuttle - 3

Jeremy Greenwood - 3

Yoshiki Ando - 3

Gordon M Phillips - 3

Sean Wang - 3

Seula Kim - 3

Melissa Chow - 3

Ryan Monarch - 3

Wenting Ma - 3

Sharat Ganapati - 3

Parag Mahajan - 3

John Van Reenen - 3

Mee Jung Kim - 3

Kyung Min Lee - 3

Veronika Penciakova - 3

Daron Acemoglu - 3

Wayne B Gray - 3

Sari Pekkala Kerr - 3

Chang-Tai Hsieh - 3

T. Kirk White - 3

Geoffrey Tate - 3

Liu Yang - 3

Elton Mykerezi - 3

Richard M. Todd - 3

Asha Sundaram - 3

Aysegül Sahin - 3

Julia I. Lane - 3

Craig Wesley Carpenter - 3

Robert Kulick - 3

Chad Syverson - 3

Mary Jialin Li - 3

Rustom M. Irani - 3

Edward Glaeser - 3

Allan Collard-Wexler - 3

Mercedes Delgado - 3

growth - 93

manufacturing - 92

employ - 90

market - 89

entrepreneurship - 83

employed - 78

labor - 77

entrepreneur - 77

recession - 77

sector - 76

macroeconomic - 73

company - 72

industrial - 71

workforce - 71

employee - 68

production - 68

revenue - 66

enterprise - 66

econometric - 65

investment - 63

sale - 62

gdp - 55

entrepreneurial - 53

innovation - 53

economist - 53

economically - 50

payroll - 49

venture - 49

earnings - 47

acquisition - 47

export - 46

finance - 43

expenditure - 42

financial - 41

endogeneity - 41

establishment - 40

quarterly - 38

estimating - 38

patent - 37

employment growth - 34

organizational - 33

spillover - 32

manufacturer - 32

corporation - 32

agency - 31

demand - 31

multinational - 30

survey - 30

trend - 30

merger - 30

exporter - 29

worker - 29

produce - 28

hiring - 27

inventory - 27

proprietor - 27

wholesale - 27

proprietorship - 27

leverage - 26

patenting - 26

technological - 25

aggregate - 25

import - 25

investor - 24

debt - 24

startup - 24

corporate - 23

financing - 23

profit - 23

loan - 22

accounting - 21

incorporated - 21

job - 21

productivity growth - 21

incentive - 20

bank - 20

innovative - 20

occupation - 20

subsidiary - 20

trading - 19

efficiency - 19

innovate - 19

earner - 19

disclosure - 19

productive - 19

regional - 19

monopolistic - 18

longitudinal - 18

invention - 18

report - 18

competitor - 18

employment dynamics - 18

equity - 17

funding - 17

bankruptcy - 17

lender - 17

founder - 17

profitability - 17

estimation - 17

lending - 17

statistical - 17

hire - 17

importer - 17

metropolitan - 17

firms grow - 17

exporting - 16

regress - 16

shock - 16

geographically - 16

data - 16

technology - 15

declining - 15

decline - 15

tariff - 15

impact - 15

banking - 15

stock - 15

economic census - 15

regulation - 14

supplier - 14

exported - 14

turnover - 14

region - 14

econometrician - 14

borrowing - 14

microdata - 14

opportunity - 14

retail - 14

data census - 14

respondent - 14

prospect - 14

growth productivity - 14

researcher - 14

foreign - 14

immigrant - 14

industry productivity - 14

custom - 13

invest - 13

population - 13

creditor - 13

productivity dispersion - 13

heterogeneity - 13

unemployed - 13

salary - 13

census bureau - 13

area - 13

firms export - 12

investing - 12

depreciation - 12

employment statistics - 12

diversification - 12

borrower - 12

retailer - 12

country - 12

wages productivity - 12

employment data - 12

younger firms - 12

warehousing - 12

rent - 12

sourcing - 12

firms productivity - 12

state - 12

startup firms - 12

business data - 12

regression - 12

shipment - 11

regulatory - 11

minority - 11

federal - 11

liquidation - 11

innovating - 11

exogeneity - 11

layoff - 11

database - 11

census data - 11

record - 11

labor markets - 11

factory - 11

business startups - 11

rural - 11

innovator - 11

endogenous - 11

city - 11

corp - 11

manager - 11

aggregate productivity - 11

ownership - 11

acquirer - 11

labor statistics - 10

census employment - 10

monopolistically - 10

strategic - 10

collateral - 10

patented - 10

relocation - 10

earn - 10

firms patents - 10

employment estimates - 10

trends employment - 10

firms young - 10

sectoral - 10

producing - 10

larger firms - 10

contract - 10

ethnicity - 10

geography - 10

datasets - 10

labor productivity - 10

retirement - 9

fund - 9

union - 9

bankrupt - 9

startups employees - 9

shift - 9

oligopolistic - 9

emission - 9

epa - 9

credit - 9

businesses grow - 9

workplace - 9

employment trends - 9

shareholder - 9

growth employment - 9

international trade - 9

hispanic - 9

migrant - 9

importing - 9

immigration - 9

research - 9

firm growth - 9

growth firms - 9

study - 9

outsourcing - 9

employing - 9

wealth - 9

consumer - 9

productivity measures - 9

takeover - 9

institutional - 8

debtor - 8

tenure - 8

regressing - 8

compensation - 8

borrow - 8

housing - 8

product - 8

specialization - 8

executive - 8

commerce - 8

competitiveness - 8

patents firms - 8

wage growth - 8

firms employment - 8

globalization - 8

exporters multinationals - 8

development - 8

outsourced - 8

imported - 8

firms size - 8

subsidy - 8

firm dynamics - 8

estimates employment - 8

externality - 8

productivity firms - 8

industry employment - 8

conglomerate - 8

census business - 7

unemployment rates - 7

average - 7

irs - 7

productivity distribution - 7

bias - 7

aggregation - 7

entry productivity - 7

pollution - 7

mortgage - 7

information census - 7

consolidated - 7

dispersion productivity - 7

measures productivity - 7

nonemployer businesses - 7

recessionary - 7

technology adoption - 7

census survey - 7

productivity estimates - 7

productivity shocks - 7

productivity dynamics - 7

developed - 7

patenting firms - 7

work census - 7

employment firms - 7

share - 7

firms trade - 7

exporting firms - 7

multinational firms - 7

reallocation productivity - 7

neighborhood - 7

geographic - 7

trademark - 7

downturn - 7

employee data - 7

agriculture - 7

regional economic - 7

cost - 7

buyer - 7

restructuring - 7

firms exporting - 6

tax - 6

restaurant - 6

spending - 6

unobserved - 6

employment distribution - 6

environmental - 6

polluting - 6

trader - 6

advancement - 6

innovation patenting - 6

migration - 6

warehouse - 6

sector productivity - 6

firm innovation - 6

firm patenting - 6

factor productivity - 6

innovation productivity - 6

employees startups - 6

worker demographics - 6

firms age - 6

regressors - 6

poverty - 6

good - 6

industry wages - 6

urban - 6

analysis - 6

decade - 6

competitive - 6

industry concentration - 6

firms census - 6

immigrant entrepreneurs - 6

confidentiality - 6

statistician - 6

coverage - 6

matching - 6

managerial - 6

management - 6

productivity wage - 6

capital - 6

businesses census - 6

rates employment - 6

fluctuation - 6

aging - 6

volatility - 6

asset - 5

pension - 5

discrimination - 5

filing - 5

productivity capital - 5

state employment - 5

impact employment - 5

forecast - 5

diversified - 5

tech - 5

socioeconomic - 5

department - 5

store - 5

grocery - 5

disaster - 5

prevalence - 5

security - 5

rates productivity - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

wage regressions - 5

autoregressive - 5

employment production - 5

job growth - 5

employment entrepreneurship - 5

industry variation - 5

diversify - 5

plant productivity - 5

publicly - 5

transition - 5

pricing - 5

imputation - 5

recession exposure - 5

rate - 5

equilibrium - 5

elasticity - 5

price - 5

use census - 5

exogenous - 5

estimator - 5

yield - 5

employment wages - 5

census research - 5

foreign trade - 5

research census - 5

censuses surveys - 5

exports firms - 5

profitable - 5

pollutant - 5

residential - 5

agglomeration - 5

2010 census - 4

mandate - 4

census disclosure - 4

employment declines - 4

establishments data - 4

employment count - 4

productivity variation - 4

analyst - 4

employment flows - 4

relocate - 4

university - 4

productivity analysis - 4

risk - 4

hurricane - 4

manufacturing productivity - 4

indian - 4

native - 4

firms import - 4

midwest - 4

immigrant workers - 4

marketing - 4

productivity increases - 4

industry growth - 4

location - 4

ethnic - 4

enforcement - 4

privacy - 4

insurance - 4

healthcare - 4

consumption - 4

electricity - 4

electricity prices - 4

black - 4

employer household - 4

level productivity - 4

reporting - 4

workers earnings - 4

earnings workers - 4

plants industry - 4

productivity size - 4

local economic - 4

saving - 4

franchising - 4

downstream - 4

recession employment - 4

census years - 4

census use - 4

business survival - 4

customer - 4

gain - 4

productivity plants - 4

earnings growth - 4

wages production - 4

linked census - 4

utilization - 4

clerical - 4

estimates productivity - 4

practices productivity - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

trade models - 4

generation - 4

information - 4

inference - 4

retailing - 4

statistical agencies - 4

resident - 4

agglomeration economies - 4

cluster - 4

regional industry - 4

regional industries - 4

restriction - 3

racial - 3

disparity - 3

quantity - 3

deviation - 3

measures employment - 3

applicant - 3

home - 3

graduate - 3

associate - 3

identifier - 3

firm data - 3

distribution - 3

merchandise - 3

percentile - 3

www census - 3

oligopoly - 3

disadvantaged - 3

town - 3

advantage - 3

wages employment - 3

poorer - 3

migrate - 3

earnings age - 3

capital productivity - 3

economic growth - 3

small firms - 3

career - 3

expense - 3

relocating - 3

plant employment - 3

policymakers - 3

statistical disclosure - 3

public - 3

medicare - 3

energy prices - 3

renewable - 3

policy - 3

productivity differences - 3

regulation productivity - 3

employment earnings - 3

earnings employees - 3

effect wages - 3

wage data - 3

firms plants - 3

owner - 3

industries estimate - 3

technical - 3

industrialized - 3

taxation - 3

white - 3

asian - 3

subsidized - 3

woman - 3

increase employment - 3

earnings inequality - 3

export growth - 3

trends labor - 3

survey data - 3

employed census - 3

surveys censuses - 3

employment measures - 3

rurality - 3

agricultural - 3

substitute - 3

franchise - 3

model - 3

supermarket - 3

empirical - 3

valuation - 3

demography - 3

plant investment - 3

environmental regulation - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 406


  • Working Paper

    National Experimental Wellbeing Statistics - Version 1

    February 2023

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-23-04

    This is the U.S. Census Bureau's first release of the National Experimental Wellbeing Statistics (NEWS) project. The NEWS project aims to produce the best possible estimates of income and poverty given all available survey and administrative data. We link survey, decennial census, administrative, and third-party data to address measurement error in income and poverty statistics. We estimate improved (pre-tax money) income and poverty statistics for 2018 by addressing several possible sources of bias documented in prior research. We address biases from 1) unit nonresponse through improved weights, 2) missing income information in both survey and administrative data through improved imputation, and 3) misreporting by combining or replacing survey responses with administrative information. Reducing survey error substantially affects key measures of well-being: We estimate median household income is 6.3 percent higher than in survey estimates, and poverty is 1.1 percentage points lower. These changes are driven by subpopulations for which survey error is particularly relevant. For house holders aged 65 and over, median household income is 27.3 percent higher and poverty is 3.3 percentage points lower than in survey estimates. We do not find a significant impact on median household income for householders under 65 or on child poverty. Finally, we discuss plans for future releases: addressing other potential sources of bias, releasing additional years of statistics, extending the income concepts measured, and including smaller geographies such as state and county.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers' Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-58

    This paper provides evidence from the US and Denmark that managers with a business degree ('business managers") reduce their employees' wages. Within five years of the appointment of a business manager, wages decline by 6% and the labor share by 5 percentage points in the US, and by 3% and 3 percentage points in Denmark. Firms appointing business managers are not on differential trends and do not enjoy higher output, investment, or employment growth thereafter. Using manager retirements and deaths and an IV strategy based on the diffusion of the practice of appointing business managers within industry, region and size quartile cells, we provide additional evidence that these are causal effects. We establish that the proximate cause of these (relative) wage effects are changes in rent-sharing practices following the appointment of business managers. Exploiting exogenous export demand shocks, we show that non-business managers share profits with their workers, whereas business managers do not. But consistent with our first set of results, these business managers show no greater ability to increase sales or profits in response to exporting opportunities. Finally, we use the influence of role models on college major choice to instrument for the decision to enroll in a business degree in Denmark and show that our estimates correspond to causal effects of practices and values acquired in business education--rather than the differential selection into business education of individuals unlikely to share rents with workers.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Business Dynamics Statistics for Single-Unit Firms

    December 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-57

    The Business Dynamics Statistics of Single Unit Firms (BDS-SU) is an experimental data product that provides information on employment and payroll dynamics for each quarter of the year at businesses that operate in one physical location. This paper describes the creation of the data tables and the value they add to the existing Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) product. We then present some analysis of the published statistics to provide context for the numbers and demonstrate how they can be used to understand both national and local business conditions, with a particular focus on 2020 and the recession induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. We next examine how firms fared in this recession compared to the Great Recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2007. We also consider the heterogenous impact of the pandemic on various industries and areas of the country, showing which types of businesses in which locations were particularly hard hit. We examine business exit rates in some detail and consider why different metro areas experienced the pandemic in different ways. We also consider entry rates and look for evidence of a surge in new businesses as seen in other data sources. We finish by providing a preview of on-going research to match the BDS to worker demographics and show statistics on the relationship between the characteristics of the firm's workers and outcomes such as firm exit and net job creation.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-54

    We study Executive Order 11246, an employment-based affirmative action policy tar geted at firms holding contracts with the federal government. We find this policy to be in effective in the 21st century, contrary to the positive effects found in the late 1900s (Miller, 2017). Our novel dataset combines data on federal contract acquisition and enforcement with US linked employer-employee Census data 2000'2014. We employ an event study around firms' acquiring a contract, based on Miller (2017), and find the policy had no ef fect on employment shares or on hiring, for any minority group. Next, we isolate the impact of the affirmative action plan, which is EO 11246's preeminent requirement that applies to firms with contracts over $50,000. Leveraging variation from this threshold in an event study and regression discontinuity design, we find similarly null effects. Last, we show that even randomized audits are not effective, suggesting weak enforcement. Our results highlight the importance of the recent budget increase for the enforcement agency, as well as recent policies enacted to improve compliance
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Snapshot Documentation, Release S2021_R2022Q4

    November 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-51

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data at the U.S. Census Bureau is a quarterly database of linked employer-employee data covering over 95% of employment in the United States. These data are used to produce a number of public-use tabulations and tools, including the Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI), LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), Job-to-Job Flows (J2J), and Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes (PSEO) data products. Researchers on approved projects may also access the underlying LEHD microdata directly, in the form of the LEHD Snapshot restricted-use data product. This document provides a detailed overview of the LEHD Snapshot as of release S2021_R2022Q4, including user guidance, variable codebooks, and an overview of the approvals needed to obtain access. Updates to the documentation for this and future snapshot releases will be made available in HTML format on the LEHD website.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The U.S. Manufacturing Sector's Response to Higher Electricity Prices: Evidence from State-Level Renewable Portfolio Standards

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-47

    While several papers examine the effects of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) on electricity prices, they mainly rely on state-level data and there has been little research on how RPS policies affect manufacturing activity via their effect on electricity prices. Using plant-level data for the entire U.S. manufacturing sector and all electric utilities from 1992 ' 2015, we jointly estimate the effect of RPS adoption and stringency on plant-level electricity prices and production decisions. To ensure that our results are not sensitive to possible pre-existing differences across manufacturing plants in RPS and non-RPS states, we implement coarsened exact covariate matching. Our results suggest that electricity prices for plants in RPS states averaged about 2% higher than in non-RPS states, notably lower than prior estimates based on state-level data. In response to these higher electricity prices, we estimate that plant electricity usage declined by 1.2% for all plants and 1.8% for energy-intensive plants, broadly consistent with published estimates of the elasticity of electricity demand for industrial users. We find smaller declines in output, employment, and hours worked (relative to the decline in electricity use). Finally, several key RPS policy design features that vary substantially from state-to-state produce heterogeneous effects on plant-level electricity prices.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    What Drives Stagnation: Monopsony or Monopoly?

    October 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-45

    Wages for the vast majority of workers have stagnated since the 1980s while productivity has grown. We investigate two coexisting explanations based on rising market power: 1. Monopsony, where dominant firms exploit the limited mobility of their own workers to pay lower wages; and 2. Monopoly, where dominant firms charge too high prices for what they sell, which lowers production and the demand for labor, and hence equilibrium wages economy-wide. Using establishment data from the US Census Bureau between 1997 and 2016, we find evidence of both monopoly and monopsony, where the former is rising over this period and the latter is stable. Both contribute to the decoupling of productivity and wage growth, with monopoly being the primary determinant: in 2016 monopoly accounts for 75% of wage stagnation, monopsony for 25%.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Opening the Black Box: Task and Skill Mix and Productivity Dispersion

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-44

    An important gap in most empirical studies of establishment-level productivity is the limited information about workers' characteristics and their tasks. Skill-adjusted labor input measures have been shown to be important for aggregate productivity measurement. Moreover, the theoretical literature on differences in production technologies across businesses increasingly emphasizes the task content of production. Our ultimate objective is to open this black box of tasks and skills at the establishment-level by combining establishment-level data on occupations from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) with a restricted-access establishment-level productivity dataset created by the BLS-Census Bureau Collaborative Micro-productivity Project. We take a first step toward this objective by exploring the conceptual, specification, and measurement issues to be confronted. We provide suggestive empirical analysis of the relationship between within-industry dispersion in productivity and tasks and skills. We find that within-industry productivity dispersion is strongly positively related to within-industry task/skill dispersion.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Measuring the Characteristics and Employment Dynamics of U.S. Inventors

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-43

    Innovation is a key driver of long run economic growth. Studying innovation requires a clear view of the characteristics and behavior of the individuals that create new ideas. A general lack of rich, large-scale data has constrained such analyses. We address this by introducing a new dataset linking patent inventors to survey, census, and administrative microdata at the U.S. Census Bureau. We use this data to provide a first look at the demographic characteristics, employer characteristics, earnings, and employment dynamics of inventors. These linkages, which will be available to researchers with approved access, dramatically increases the scope of what can be learned about inventors and innovative activity.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Trade Liberalization and Labor-Market Outcomes: Evidence from US Matched Employer-Employee Data

    September 2022

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-22-42

    We use matched employer-employee data to examine outcomes among workers initially employed within and outside manufacturing after trade liberalization with China. We find that exposure to this shock operates predominantly through workers' counties (versus industries), that larger own industry and downstream exposure typically reduce relative earnings, and that greater upstream exposure often raises them. The latter is particularly important outside manufacturing: while we find substantial and persistent predicted declines in relative earnings among manufacturing workers, those outside manufacturing are generally predicted to experience relative earnings gains. Investigation of employment reactions indicates they account for a small share of the earnings effect.
    View Full Paper PDF