CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Total Factor Productivity'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 106

Longitudinal Business Database - 90

Center for Economic Studies - 90

North American Industry Classification System - 77

Ordinary Least Squares - 77

Census of Manufactures - 75

National Bureau of Economic Research - 68

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 67

Longitudinal Research Database - 67

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 65

Standard Industrial Classification - 60

National Science Foundation - 55

Cobb-Douglas - 54

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 42

Economic Census - 36

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 32

Federal Reserve Bank - 31

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 30

Internal Revenue Service - 28

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 27

Special Sworn Status - 25

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 24

TFPQ - 22

Employer Identification Numbers - 22

Generalized Method of Moments - 21

Federal Reserve System - 18

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 18

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 17

Department of Economics - 15

Business Dynamics Statistics - 15

Census Bureau Business Register - 15

Business Register - 15

TFPR - 14

University of Chicago - 14

Current Population Survey - 14

New York University - 14

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 13

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 13

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 13

Securities and Exchange Commission - 12

IQR - 12

Environmental Protection Agency - 12

World Bank - 12

Disclosure Review Board - 11

Federal Trade Commission - 11

American Economic Review - 11

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 10

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 10

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 10

Research Data Center - 10

Securities Data Company - 10

Labor Productivity - 9

University of Maryland - 9

Boston College - 9

American Community Survey - 9

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Center for Research in Security Prices - 9

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 8

International Trade Research Report - 8

Kauffman Foundation - 8

National Income and Product Accounts - 8

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 8

Review of Economics and Statistics - 8

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 8

Boston Research Data Center - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

UC Berkeley - 7

Decennial Census - 7

Retirement History Survey - 7

County Business Patterns - 7

Harmonized System - 7

Fabricated Metal Products - 7

Journal of Economic Literature - 7

Commodity Flow Survey - 7

Initial Public Offering - 6

University of California Los Angeles - 6

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 6

World Trade Organization - 6

Value Added - 6

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 6

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 6

Foreign Direct Investment - 6

North American Industry Classi - 6

Duke University - 6

Journal of Political Economy - 6

Journal of Econometrics - 6

Net Present Value - 6

PAOC - 6

COMPUSTAT - 6

Department of Commerce - 6

Administrative Records - 6

Department of Homeland Security - 5

Board of Governors - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

Department of Labor - 5

Annual Business Survey - 5

Department of Justice - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Energy Information Administration - 5

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 5

Council of Economic Advisers - 5

E32 - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

American Economic Association - 5

State Energy Data System - 5

University of Michigan - 5

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

European Union - 5

Review of Economic Studies - 5

MIT Press - 5

Northwestern University - 4

Wholesale Trade - 4

Hypothesis 2 - 4

Patent and Trademark Office - 4

Princeton University - 4

General Accounting Office - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

CDF - 4

Cumulative Density Function - 4

Company Organization Survey - 4

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 4

New York Times - 4

Princeton University Press - 4

Statistics Canada - 4

Stanford University - 4

2SLS - 4

Cambridge University Press - 4

Journal of International Economics - 4

Core Based Statistical Area - 4

Columbia University - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 3

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 3

IBM - 3

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 3

Social Security Administration - 3

Social Security - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Public Administration - 3

National Institute on Aging - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 3

2010 Census - 3

Wal-Mart - 3

VAR - 3

Establishment Micro Properties - 3

Postal Service - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Harvard University - 3

Business Services - 3

Department of Energy - 3

Cornell University - 3

CAAA - 3

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 3

Chicago RDC - 3

Heckscher-Ohlin - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

production - 104

manufacturing - 71

growth - 68

market - 60

produce - 56

investment - 55

macroeconomic - 55

econometric - 53

revenue - 52

expenditure - 49

sale - 45

industrial - 40

efficiency - 39

economist - 39

estimating - 39

economically - 39

demand - 36

recession - 36

labor - 35

productive - 34

acquisition - 34

gdp - 33

profit - 31

sector - 28

productivity growth - 28

company - 28

estimation - 25

monopolistic - 24

endogeneity - 24

merger - 24

earnings - 23

export - 22

depreciation - 22

employ - 21

technological - 21

innovation - 21

spillover - 21

industry productivity - 21

manufacturer - 20

plant productivity - 20

enterprise - 19

leverage - 19

productivity dispersion - 18

firms productivity - 18

profitability - 18

exporter - 17

aggregate - 16

productivity measures - 16

finance - 16

regression - 16

productivity plants - 16

quarterly - 15

financial - 15

incentive - 15

econometrician - 15

regulation - 15

organizational - 15

equity - 14

accounting - 14

inventory - 14

factor productivity - 14

factory - 14

rates productivity - 14

stock - 14

labor productivity - 14

aggregate productivity - 13

employed - 13

employee - 13

growth productivity - 13

corporate - 13

competitor - 13

acquirer - 13

debt - 12

statistical - 12

measures productivity - 12

workforce - 12

entrepreneurship - 12

investor - 12

patent - 12

takeover - 12

consumption - 12

cost - 12

multinational - 12

product - 12

payroll - 11

import - 11

technology - 11

productivity dynamics - 11

conglomerate - 11

heterogeneity - 11

gain - 11

endogenous - 11

producing - 11

dispersion productivity - 10

regress - 10

employment growth - 10

corporation - 9

trend - 9

shareholder - 9

geographically - 9

shock - 9

investing - 9

invest - 9

industry concentration - 9

exogeneity - 9

tariff - 9

estimator - 9

spending - 9

emission - 9

pollution - 9

capital - 9

ownership - 9

quantity - 8

bank - 8

borrowing - 8

estimates productivity - 8

productivity analysis - 8

exporting - 8

productivity estimates - 8

firms plants - 8

plants industry - 8

subsidiary - 8

regulatory - 8

epa - 8

environmental - 8

strategic - 8

efficient - 8

plant - 8

profitable - 8

textile - 8

productivity distribution - 7

financing - 7

loan - 7

impact - 7

entrepreneur - 7

exported - 7

investment productivity - 7

productivity shocks - 7

innovating - 7

wages productivity - 7

plants firms - 7

externality - 7

level productivity - 7

monopolistically - 7

productivity differences - 7

establishment - 7

regulation productivity - 7

econometrically - 7

specialization - 7

manager - 7

yield - 7

analysis productivity - 7

declining - 7

exogenous - 7

bankruptcy - 7

pricing - 7

commodity - 7

pollutant - 7

productivity variation - 6

lending - 6

lender - 6

creditor - 6

average - 6

wholesale - 6

venture - 6

subsidy - 6

productivity impacts - 6

innovate - 6

city - 6

relocation - 6

plant investment - 6

regional - 6

competitiveness - 6

reallocation productivity - 6

area - 6

equilibrium - 6

share - 6

regressing - 6

metropolitan - 6

price - 6

productivity size - 6

management - 6

productivity increases - 6

liquidation - 6

productivity firms - 6

trading - 6

fluctuation - 6

consumer - 6

performance - 6

diversification - 6

incorporated - 5

collateral - 5

contract - 5

asset - 5

report - 5

respondent - 5

retailer - 5

sector productivity - 5

occupation - 5

entrepreneurial - 5

technology adoption - 5

prospect - 5

innovation productivity - 5

innovative - 5

worker - 5

relocate - 5

salary - 5

rent - 5

plant employment - 5

industries estimate - 5

productivity wage - 5

wage growth - 5

estimates production - 5

agriculture - 5

observed productivity - 5

technical - 5

larger firms - 5

security - 5

capital productivity - 5

recessionary - 5

budget - 5

managerial - 5

rate - 5

utilization - 5

volatility - 5

mergers acquisitions - 5

restructuring - 5

outsourcing - 5

environmental regulation - 5

costs pollution - 5

pollution abatement - 5

owner - 5

industry variation - 5

refinery - 5

polluting - 5

deviation - 4

microdata - 4

borrow - 4

credit - 4

banking - 4

fund - 4

disclosure - 4

tax - 4

imputation - 4

commerce - 4

data census - 4

survey - 4

employment effects - 4

layoff - 4

shipment - 4

regressors - 4

invention - 4

researcher - 4

innovator - 4

patenting - 4

oligopolistic - 4

region - 4

manufacturing plants - 4

country - 4

sectoral - 4

entry productivity - 4

downturn - 4

firms grow - 4

decline - 4

estimates employment - 4

employment dynamics - 4

oligopoly - 4

bankrupt - 4

debtor - 4

expense - 4

buyer - 4

practices productivity - 4

forecast - 4

aggregation - 4

firms export - 4

exporting firms - 4

downstream - 4

good - 4

international trade - 4

regulated - 4

abatement expenditures - 4

manufacturing industries - 4

diversify - 4

data - 4

analysis - 4

housing - 3

mortgage - 3

irs - 3

warehouse - 3

retail - 3

grocery - 3

percentile - 3

labor statistics - 3

manufacturing productivity - 3

state - 3

shift - 3

urban - 3

relocating - 3

bias - 3

industry output - 3

labor markets - 3

geography - 3

regional economic - 3

local economic - 3

tech - 3

outsourced - 3

sourcing - 3

industry growth - 3

employment distribution - 3

hire - 3

trends labor - 3

employment production - 3

economic growth - 3

supplier - 3

energy - 3

autoregressive - 3

inflation - 3

heterogeneous - 3

hiring - 3

firms trade - 3

proprietor - 3

model - 3

unobserved - 3

development - 3

customer - 3

analyst - 3

agency - 3

trade models - 3

workplace - 3

valuation - 3

economic census - 3

advantage - 3

diversified - 3

plants industries - 3

measure - 3

study - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 208


  • Working Paper

    Multiregional Firms and Region Switching in the US Manufacturing Sector

    January 2015

    Authors: Antoine Gervais

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-22

    This paper uses data on US manufacturing firms to study a new extensive margin, the reallocation of resources that takes place within surviving firms as they open and close establishments in different regions. To motivate the empirical analysis, I extend existing models of industry dynamics to include production-location decisions within firms. The empirical results provide support for the mechanisms emphasized by the theoretical model. In the data, only about 3 percent of firms make the same product in more than one region, but these multiregional firms are more productive on average compared to single-region firms, and they account for about two-thirds of output. The results also show that "region-switching" is pervasive among multiregional firms, is correlated with changes in firm characteristics, and leads to a more efficient allocation of resources within firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Slow to Hire, Quick to Fire: Employment Dynamics with Asymmetric Responses to News

    January 2015

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-15-02

    We study the distribution of employment growth when hiring responds more to bad shocks than to good shocks. Such a concave hiring rule endogenously generates higher moments observed in establishment-level Census data for both the cross section and the time series. In particular, both aggregate conditional volatility ("macro-volatility") and the cross-sectional dispersion of employment growth ("micro-volatility") are countercyclical. Moreover, employment growth is negatively skewed in the cross section and time series, while TFP is not. The estimated response of employment growth to TFP innovations is su ciently concave to induce signi cant skewness as well as movements in volatility of employment growth.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    THE URBAN DENSITY PREMIUM ACROSS ESTABLISHMENTS

    October 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-43

    We use longitudinal microdata to estimate the urban density premium for U.S. establishments, controlling for observed establishment characteristics and dynamic establishment behavior. Consistent with previous studies, we estimate a density premium between 6 and 10 percent, even after controlling for establishment composition, local skill mix, and the endogeneity of location choice. More importantly, we find that the estimated density premium is realized almost entirely at birth and is constant over the life of establishments. We find little evidence that the endogenous entry or exit of establishments can account for any of the estimated density premium. We interpret our results as implying that the returns to agglomeration diffuse within a city through a reallocation channel rather than through an increase in the productivity of existing firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    REALLY UNCERTAIN BUSINESS CYCLES

    March 2014

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-18

    We propose uncertainty shocks as a new shock that drives business cycles. First, we demonstrate that microeconomic uncertainty is robustly countercyclical, rising sharply during recessions, particularly during the Great Recession of 2007-2009. Second, we quantify the impact of time-varying uncertainty on the economy in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms. We find that reasonably calibrated uncertainty shocks can explain drops and rebounds in GDP of around 3%. Moreover, we show that increased uncertainty alters the relative impact of government policies, making them initially less effective and then subsequently more effective.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    FLUCTUATIONS IN UNCERTAINTY

    March 2014

    Authors: Nicholas Bloom

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-17

    This review article tries to answer four questions: (i) what are the stylized facts about uncertainty over time; (ii) why does uncertainty vary; (iii) do fluctuations in uncertainty matter; and (iv) did higher uncertainty worsen the Great Recession of 2007-2009? On the first question both macro and micro uncertainty appears to rise sharply in recessions. On the second question the types of exogenous shocks like wars, financial panics and oil price jumps that cause recessions appear to directly increase uncertainty, and uncertainty also appears to endogenously rise further during recessions. On the third question, the evidence suggests uncertainty is damaging for short-run investment and hiring, but there is some evidence it may stimulate longer-run innovation. Finally, in terms of the Great Recession, the large jump in uncertainty in 2008 potentially accounted for about one third of the drop in GDP.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    GLOBALIZATION AND TOP INCOME SHARES

    February 2014

    Authors: Lin Ma

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-14-07

    How does globalization affect the income gaps between the rich and the poor? This paper presents a new piece of empirical evidence showing that access to the global market, either through exporting or through multinational production, is associated with a higher executive-to-worker pay ratio within the firm. It then builds a model with heterogeneous firms, occupational choice, and executive compensation to model analytically and assess quantitatively the impact of globalization on the income gaps between the rich and the poor. The key mechanism is that the 'gains from trade' are not distributed evenly within the same firm. The compensation of an executive is positively linked to the size of the firm, while the wage paid to the workers is determined in a country- wide labor market. Any extra profit earned in the foreign markets benefits the executives more than the average worker. Counterfactual exercises suggest that this new channel is quantitatively important for the observed surge in top income shares in the data. Using the changes in the volume of trade and multinational firm sales, the model can explain around 33 percent of the surge in top income shares over the past two decades in the United States.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Surprisingly Swift Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment

    December 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-59

    This paper finds a link between the sharp drop in U.S. manufacturing employment beginning in 2001 and a change in U.S. trade policy that eliminated potential tariff increases on Chinese imports. Industries where the threat of tariff hikes declines the most experience more severe employment losses along with larger increases in the value of imports from China and the number of firms engaged in China-U.S. trade. These results are robust to other potential explanations of the employment loss, and we show that the U.S. employment trends differ from those in the EU, where there was no change in policy.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    REALLOCATION IN THE GREAT RECESSION: CLEANSING OR NOT?

    August 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-42

    The high pace of output and input reallocation across producers is pervasive in the U.S. economy. Evidence shows this high pace of reallocation is closely linked to productivity. Resources are shifted away from low productivity producers towards high productivity producers. While these patterns hold on average, the extent to which the reallocation dynamics in recessions are 'cleansing' is an open question. That is, are recessions periods of increased reallocation that move resources away from lower productivity activities towards higher productivity uses? It could be recessions are times when the opportunity cost of time and resources are low implying recessions will be times of accelerated productivity enhancing reallocation. Prior research suggests the recession in the early 1980s is consistent with an accelerated pace of productivity enhancing reallocation. Alternative hypotheses highlight the potential distortions to reallocation dynamics in recessions. Such distortions might arise from many factors including, for example, distortions to credit markets. We find that in post-1980 recessions prior to the Great Recession, downturns are periods of accelerated reallocation that is even more productivity enhancing than in normal times. In the Great Recession, we find the intensity of reallocation fell rather than rose (due to the especially sharp decline in job creation) and the reallocation that did occur was less productivity enhancing than in prior recessions.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT: A REASSESSMENT

    July 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-36

    This paper examines the impact of environmental regulation on industry employment, using a structural model based on data from the Census Bureau's Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures Survey. This model was developed in an earlier paper (Morgenstern, Pizer, and Shih (2002) - MPS). We extend MPS by examining additional industries and additional years. We find widely varying estimates across industries, including many implausibly large positive employment effects. We explore several possible explanations for these results, without reaching a satisfactory conclusion. Our results call into question the frequent use of the average impacts estimated by MPS as a basis for calculating the quantitative impacts of new environmental regulations on employment.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    EVIDENCE OF AN 'ENERGY-MANAGEMENT GAP' IN U.S. MANUFACTURING: SPILLOVERS FROM FIRM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO ENERGY EFFICIENCY

    April 2013

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-13-25

    In this paper we merge a well-cited survey of firm management practices into confidential U.S. Census microdata to examine whether generic, i.e. non-energy specific, firm management practices, 'spillover' to enhance energy efficiency in the United States. We find the relationship in U.S. plants to be more nuanced than past research on UK plants has suggested. Most management techniques have beneficial spillovers to energy efficiency, but an emphasis on generic targets, conditional on other management practices, results in spillovers that increase energy intensity. Our specification controls for industry specific effects at a detailed 6-digit NAICS level and shows that this result is stronger for firms in energy intensive industries. We interpret the empirical result that generic management practices do not necessarily spillover to improved energy performance as evidence of an 'energy management gap.'
    View Full Paper PDF