CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Ordinary Least Squares'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

North American Industry Classification System - 103

Longitudinal Business Database - 100

Center for Economic Studies - 100

National Science Foundation - 80

Total Factor Productivity - 78

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 76

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 76

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 69

National Bureau of Economic Research - 66

Standard Industrial Classification - 66

Current Population Survey - 64

Internal Revenue Service - 62

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 60

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 59

American Community Survey - 59

Census of Manufactures - 53

Employer Identification Numbers - 45

Longitudinal Research Database - 45

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 44

Federal Reserve Bank - 40

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 40

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 39

Decennial Census - 38

Cobb-Douglas - 37

Census of Manufacturing Firms - 34

Protected Identification Key - 34

Disclosure Review Board - 32

Social Security Administration - 32

Economic Census - 32

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 29

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 29

Special Sworn Status - 29

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 28

University of Chicago - 26

Business Register - 25

Federal Reserve System - 24

2SLS - 23

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 23

Generalized Method of Moments - 23

Social Security - 22

Social Security Number - 21

2010 Census - 19

Census Bureau Business Register - 19

American Economic Review - 19

Journal of Economic Literature - 19

Harmonized System - 18

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 17

New York University - 17

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 16

Longitudinal Firm Trade Transactions Database - 16

Department of Economics - 16

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 15

Research Data Center - 15

PSID - 15

Journal of Political Economy - 15

Harvard University - 15

County Business Patterns - 15

Environmental Protection Agency - 15

International Trade Research Report - 15

University of Maryland - 14

University of Michigan - 13

Business Dynamics Statistics - 13

Department of Labor - 13

UC Berkeley - 13

W-2 - 12

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 12

Kauffman Foundation - 12

World Bank - 12

American Economic Association - 12

Cornell University - 12

Securities and Exchange Commission - 11

Department of Homeland Security - 11

Board of Governors - 11

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 11

National Center for Health Statistics - 11

Postal Service - 11

Department of Agriculture - 11

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 11

1940 Census - 10

AKM - 10

World Trade Organization - 10

Columbia University - 10

Person Validation System - 10

Retirement History Survey - 10

North American Industry Classi - 10

Journal of Labor Economics - 10

General Accounting Office - 9

Office of Management and Budget - 9

Technical Services - 9

Hypothesis 2 - 9

NBER Summer Institute - 9

Business Services - 9

Department of Commerce - 9

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 9

Retail Trade - 9

Unemployment Insurance - 9

Journal of Econometrics - 9

Journal of Economic Perspectives - 9

TFPQ - 9

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 9

Review of Economics and Statistics - 9

MIT Press - 9

Boston College - 8

Harvard Business School - 8

Federal Reserve Board of Governors - 8

Supreme Court - 8

Duke University - 8

Establishment Micro Properties - 8

Housing and Urban Development - 8

Patent and Trademark Office - 8

Indian Health Service - 8

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 8

Heckscher-Ohlin - 8

Wholesale Trade - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 8

Person Identification Validation System - 8

Boston Research Data Center - 8

NUMIDENT - 7

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 7

Russell Sage Foundation - 7

MTO - 7

Department of Education - 7

Labor Productivity - 7

Master Address File - 7

Characteristics of Business Owners - 7

Small Business Administration - 7

State Energy Data System - 7

Princeton University Press - 7

University of California Los Angeles - 7

Survey of Manufacturing Technology - 7

Electronic Data Interchange - 7

Journal of International Economics - 7

Computer Network Use Supplement - 7

Data Management System - 6

Linear Probability Models - 6

Individual Characteristics File - 6

Earned Income Tax Credit - 6

Center for Research in Security Prices - 6

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 6

National Income and Product Accounts - 6

Initial Public Offering - 6

University of Toronto - 6

National Ambient Air Quality Standards - 6

Core Based Statistical Area - 6

Bureau of Labor - 6

Princeton University - 6

Employer-Household Dynamics - 6

Health and Retirement Study - 6

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 6

Administrative Records - 6

IQR - 6

Public Administration - 6

National Institute on Aging - 6

Cambridge University Press - 6

Fabricated Metal Products - 6

Economic Research Service - 6

National Institutes of Health - 5

Adjusted Gross Income - 5

American Immigration Council - 5

Arts, Entertainment - 5

Professional Services - 5

Federal Trade Commission - 5

Department of Justice - 5

COVID-19 - 5

Census Numident - 5

Survey of Business Owners - 5

Consumer Expenditure Survey - 5

Survey of Industrial Research and Development - 5

Value Added - 5

CAAA - 5

Washington University - 5

General Education Development - 5

Regression Discontinuity Design - 5

Employment History File - 5

Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey - 5

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 5

Personally Identifiable Information - 5

Review of Economic Studies - 5

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

Journal of Human Resources - 5

North American Free Trade Agreement - 5

Net Present Value - 5

BLS Handbook of Methods - 5

Securities Data Company - 5

University of Minnesota - 5

E32 - 5

Customs and Border Protection - 5

Census of Retail Trade - 5

New York Times - 5

Geographic Information Systems - 5

Social Security Disability Insurance - 5

National Research Council - 5

PAOC - 5

Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures - 5

WECD - 5

Selective Service System - 4

Educational Services - 4

Annual Business Survey - 4

Detailed Earnings Records - 4

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 4

Yale University - 4

Business R&D and Innovation Survey - 4

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics - 4

Agriculture, Forestry - 4

Penn State University - 4

Michigan Institute for Data Science - 4

Indian Housing Information Center - 4

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

IBM - 4

Energy Information Administration - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Standard Occupational Classification - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Disability Insurance - 4

Stanford University - 4

Management and Organizational Practices Survey - 4

Information and Communication Technology Survey - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research - 4

Foreign Direct Investment - 4

University of California - 4

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 4

Labor Turnover Survey - 4

Food and Nutrition Service - 4

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 4

Local Employment Dynamics - 4

Wal-Mart - 4

International Standard Industrial Classification - 4

Stern School of Business - 4

Service Annual Survey - 4

University of Texas - 4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - 4

Permanent Plant Number - 4

Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas - 4

Auxiliary Establishment Survey - 4

Insurance Information Institute - 4

COMPUSTAT - 4

NICHD - 3

Commodity Flow Survey - 3

ASEC - 3

TFPR - 3

Social and Economic Supplement - 3

Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

Federal Register - 3

Medicaid Services - 3

Master Earnings File - 3

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 3

American Housing Survey - 3

MAF-ARF - 3

European Commission - 3

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 3

Census Industry Code - 3

Census Edited File - 3

Herfindahl-Hirschman - 3

European Union - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Accommodation and Food Services - 3

SSA Numident - 3

Carnegie Mellon University - 3

Employer Characteristics File - 3

Georgetown University - 3

Company Organization Survey - 3

JOLTS - 3

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Northwestern University - 3

United States Census Bureau - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

United Nations - 3

IZA - 3

MWTP - 3

Computer Aided Design - 3

Census of Services - 3

Summary Earnings Records - 3

New England County Metropolitan - 3

labor - 74

econometric - 74

production - 71

employ - 65

manufacturing - 65

employed - 55

estimating - 54

workforce - 53

market - 52

economist - 52

macroeconomic - 51

industrial - 50

recession - 50

endogeneity - 49

growth - 47

earnings - 46

expenditure - 46

investment - 44

sale - 40

employee - 39

export - 36

revenue - 36

demand - 35

estimation - 33

economically - 33

produce - 32

company - 32

sector - 29

gdp - 28

entrepreneurship - 28

spillover - 28

finance - 26

heterogeneity - 26

housing - 26

worker - 26

innovation - 26

neighborhood - 25

exporter - 24

entrepreneur - 24

manufacturer - 24

technological - 23

payroll - 23

hiring - 23

monopolistic - 23

profit - 23

occupation - 22

productivity growth - 22

efficiency - 22

financial - 21

enterprise - 21

unemployed - 21

poverty - 21

salary - 21

productive - 21

organizational - 20

disadvantaged - 19

segregation - 19

import - 19

rent - 19

immigrant - 19

competitor - 19

establishment - 19

acquisition - 19

incentive - 18

welfare - 18

ethnicity - 18

regression - 18

unobserved - 17

discrimination - 17

profitability - 17

econometrician - 17

survey - 17

technology - 17

residential - 16

population - 16

metropolitan - 16

resident - 16

merger - 16

industry productivity - 16

entrepreneurial - 15

residence - 15

depreciation - 15

job - 15

hispanic - 15

socioeconomic - 14

schooling - 14

minority - 14

corporate - 14

debt - 14

regress - 14

financing - 14

earn - 14

aggregate - 14

consumption - 14

factory - 14

leverage - 14

regulation - 14

investor - 13

earner - 13

tariff - 13

trading - 13

diversification - 13

impact - 13

loan - 13

multinational - 13

product - 13

workplace - 13

venture - 13

retirement - 12

lender - 12

bias - 12

family - 12

statistical - 12

estimator - 12

hire - 12

employment growth - 12

emission - 12

enrollment - 12

bankruptcy - 11

incorporated - 11

segregated - 11

relocation - 11

lending - 11

respondent - 11

patent - 11

productivity dynamics - 11

layoff - 11

country - 11

labor productivity - 11

ethnic - 11

pollution - 11

city - 11

immigration - 11

cost - 11

regulatory - 11

exogeneity - 11

educated - 10

quarterly - 10

unemployment rates - 10

intergenerational - 10

price - 10

regressing - 10

borrower - 10

borrowing - 10

exporting - 10

productivity estimates - 10

growth productivity - 10

labor markets - 10

regional - 10

specialization - 10

endogenous - 10

environmental - 10

racial - 10

disparity - 10

productivity measures - 10

geographically - 10

estimates productivity - 10

state - 10

plant productivity - 10

accounting - 9

invest - 9

corporation - 9

creditor - 9

longitudinal - 9

neighbor - 9

renter - 9

commodity - 9

pricing - 9

federal - 9

shock - 9

mobility - 9

bank - 9

consumer - 9

factor productivity - 9

prospect - 9

stock - 9

outsourcing - 9

pollutant - 9

wealth - 9

tax - 9

international trade - 9

tenure - 9

productivity analysis - 9

productivity plants - 9

funding - 8

union - 8

rural - 8

strategic - 8

compensation - 8

opportunity - 8

census bureau - 8

spending - 8

investment productivity - 8

subsidiary - 8

outsourced - 8

inventory - 8

supplier - 8

productivity differences - 8

migrant - 8

relocating - 8

producing - 8

investing - 7

equity - 7

trend - 7

generation - 7

shipment - 7

graduate - 7

home - 7

sampling - 7

good - 7

effect wages - 7

exported - 7

productivity shocks - 7

wages productivity - 7

importer - 7

urban - 7

black - 7

efficient - 7

census data - 7

wage data - 7

aggregate productivity - 7

labor statistics - 7

estimates employment - 7

wage changes - 7

employment dynamics - 7

suburb - 7

manufacturing industries - 7

education - 6

mortality - 6

bankrupt - 6

agency - 6

parent - 6

parental - 6

earnings mobility - 6

retailer - 6

wholesale - 6

region - 6

researcher - 6

aggregation - 6

diversified - 6

credit - 6

average - 6

regressors - 6

invention - 6

manufacturing productivity - 6

productivity impacts - 6

relocate - 6

patenting - 6

monopolistically - 6

race - 6

wage growth - 6

industry concentration - 6

wage differences - 6

epa - 6

eligible - 6

manager - 6

management - 6

productivity wage - 6

measures productivity - 6

migrate - 6

migration - 6

acquirer - 6

recessionary - 6

analysis productivity - 6

productivity increases - 6

locality - 6

firms productivity - 6

area - 6

discriminatory - 6

dependent - 6

employing - 6

proprietorship - 6

profitable - 6

fund - 5

pension - 5

school - 5

citizen - 5

liquidation - 5

employment statistics - 5

parents income - 5

estimates intergenerational - 5

rate - 5

custom - 5

shift - 5

tech - 5

oligopolistic - 5

poorer - 5

income neighborhoods - 5

borrow - 5

collateral - 5

banking - 5

gain - 5

trade costs - 5

subsidy - 5

rates productivity - 5

productivity size - 5

externality - 5

larger firms - 5

industry wages - 5

mexican - 5

census responses - 5

commerce - 5

startup - 5

proprietor - 5

competitiveness - 5

advantage - 5

industry variation - 5

diversify - 5

budget - 5

customer - 5

saving - 5

wage effects - 5

wage industries - 5

eligibility - 5

managerial - 5

risk - 5

regulation productivity - 5

productivity dispersion - 5

industries estimate - 5

sourcing - 5

immigrant entrepreneurs - 5

takeover - 5

firms size - 5

employer household - 5

fertility - 5

decade - 5

declining - 5

trends labor - 5

firms trade - 5

insurance - 5

technical - 5

adulthood - 5

district - 5

report - 5

econometrically - 5

agricultural - 5

ownership - 5

plant investment - 5

abatement expenditures - 5

pollution abatement - 5

plants industry - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

polluting - 5

expense - 5

asset - 4

institutional - 4

endowment - 4

woman - 4

gender - 4

citizenship - 4

debtor - 4

filing - 4

innovator - 4

grandparent - 4

impact employment - 4

development - 4

outcome - 4

microdata - 4

wage gap - 4

data - 4

sample - 4

effects employment - 4

productivity capital - 4

innovate - 4

exogenous - 4

practices productivity - 4

estimates pollution - 4

importing - 4

imported - 4

latino - 4

census household - 4

white - 4

substitute - 4

prices products - 4

residential segregation - 4

regulated - 4

reside - 4

foreign - 4

export market - 4

moving - 4

firms grow - 4

disability - 4

census research - 4

census employment - 4

sectoral - 4

employment wages - 4

earnings workers - 4

startup firms - 4

startups employees - 4

maternal - 4

birth - 4

mother - 4

recession employment - 4

contract - 4

retail - 4

trade models - 4

social - 4

quantity - 4

dispersion productivity - 4

suburban - 4

restructuring - 4

elasticity - 4

employment measures - 4

assimilation - 4

asian - 4

inference - 4

amenity - 4

agriculture - 4

shareholder - 4

conglomerate - 4

firms export - 4

firms exporting - 4

exporting firms - 4

partnership - 4

utilization - 4

environmental regulation - 4

costs pollution - 4

native - 4

immigrant population - 4

firms plants - 4

plants firms - 4

performance - 4

worker wages - 4

compliance - 4

plants industries - 4

textile - 4

estimates production - 4

childbearing - 3

warehousing - 3

marketing - 3

state employment - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

sociology - 3

family income - 3

adopt - 3

inflation - 3

career - 3

earnings growth - 3

analyst - 3

forecast - 3

entry productivity - 3

applicant - 3

neighborhood income - 3

income housing - 3

mortgage - 3

associate - 3

earnings gap - 3

earns - 3

ssa - 3

2010 census - 3

earnings employees - 3

innovating - 3

employment increases - 3

taxpayer - 3

capital productivity - 3

growth employment - 3

economic growth - 3

1040 - 3

immigrant workers - 3

refugee - 3

study - 3

globalization - 3

affluent - 3

electricity - 3

energy - 3

energy efficiency - 3

policy - 3

utility - 3

survey households - 3

imputation - 3

executive - 3

equilibrium - 3

level productivity - 3

firms import - 3

migrating - 3

enrolled - 3

employment trends - 3

data census - 3

founder - 3

pollution exposure - 3

pregnancy - 3

wages production - 3

employment recession - 3

younger firms - 3

foreign trade - 3

fiscal - 3

coverage - 3

grocery - 3

supermarket - 3

aging - 3

mandate - 3

concentration - 3

technology adoption - 3

wage variation - 3

percentile - 3

productivity firms - 3

model - 3

geography - 3

decline - 3

employment count - 3

restaurant - 3

suburbanization - 3

census years - 3

regional economic - 3

local economic - 3

export growth - 3

exports firms - 3

network - 3

economic census - 3

retailing - 3

taxation - 3

share - 3

environmental expenditures - 3

house - 3

capital - 3

plant - 3

manufacturing plants - 3

agglomeration - 3

computer - 3

productivity variation - 3

research census - 3

observed productivity - 3

farm - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 315


  • Working Paper

    Automation, Labor Share, and Productivity: Plant-Level Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing

    September 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-39

    This paper provides new evidence on the plant-level relationship between automation, labor and capital usage, and productivity. The evidence, based on the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Manufacturing Technology, indicates that more automated establishments have lower production labor share and higher capital share, and a smaller fraction of workers in production who receive higher wages. These establishments also have higher labor productivity and experience larger long-term labor share declines. The relationship between automation and relative factor usage is modelled using a CES production function with endogenous technology choice. This deviation from the standard Cobb-Douglas assumption is necessary if the within-industry differences in the capital-labor ratio are determined by relative input price differences. The CES-based total factor productivity estimates are significantly different from the ones derived under Cobb-Douglas production and positively related to automation. The results, taken together with earlier findings of the productivity literature, suggest that the adoption of automation may be one mechanism associated with the rise of superstar firms.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Understanding the Quality of Alternative Citizenship Data Sources for the 2020 Census

    August 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-38R

    This paper examines the quality of citizenship data in self-reported survey responses compared to administrative records and evaluates options for constructing an accurate count of resident U.S. citizens. Person-level discrepancies between survey-collected citizenship data and administrative records are more pervasive than previously reported in studies comparing survey and administrative data aggregates. Our results imply that survey-sourced citizenship data produce significantly lower estimates of the noncitizen share of the population than would be produced from currently available administrative records; both the survey-sourced and administrative data have shortcomings that could contribute to this difference. Our evidence is consistent with noncitizen respondents misreporting their own citizenship status and failing to report that of other household members. At the same time, currently available administrative records may miss some naturalizations and capture others with a delay. The evidence in this paper also suggests that adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census would lead to lower self-response rates in households potentially containing noncitizens, resulting in higher fieldwork costs and a lower-quality population count.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Do Walmart Supercenters Improve Food Security?

    June 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-31

    This paper examines the effect of Walmart Supercenters, which lower food prices and expand food availability, on household and child food insecurity. Our food insecurity-related outcomes come from the 2001-2012 waves of the December Current Population Study Food Security Supplement. Using narrow geographic identifiers available in the restricted version of these data, we compute the distance between each household's census tract of residence and the nearest Walmart Supercenter. We estimate instrumental variables models that leverage the predictable geographic expansion patterns of Walmart Supercenters outward from Walmart's corporate headquarters. Results suggest that closer proximity to a Walmart Supercenter improves the food security of households and children, as measured by number of affirmative responses to a food insecurity questionnaire and an indicator for food insecurity. The effects are largest among low-income households and children, but are also sizeable for middle-income children.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Older and Slower: The Startup Deficit's Lasting Effects on Aggregate Productivity Growth

    June 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-29

    We investigate the link between declining firm entry, aging incumbent firms and sluggish U.S. productivity growth. We provide a dynamic decomposition framework to characterize the contributions to industry productivity growth across the firm age distribution and apply this framework to the newly developed Revenue-enhanced Longitudinal Business Database (ReLBD). Overall, several key findings emerge: (i) the relationship between firm age and productivity growth is downward sloping and convex; (ii) the magnitudes are substantial and significant but fade quickly, with nearly 2/3 of the effect disappearing after five years and nearly the entire effect disappearing after ten; (iii) the higher productivity growth of young firms is driven nearly exclusively by the forces of selection and reallocation. Our results suggest a cumulative drag on aggregate productivity of 3.1% since 1980. Using an instrumental variables strategy we find a consistent pattern across states/MSAs in the U.S. The patterns are broadly consistent with a standard model of firm dynamics with monopolistic competition.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Fathers, Children, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Employers

    March 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-12

    We document the tendency of fathers in the U.S. to share employers with their sons and daughters. We show that the rate of job sharing is much higher than can be explained by the fact that fathers and sons tend to live near each other. Younger children are much more likely to share their father's employer, as are children of high-earning fathers. We find that sons' earnings at shared jobs tend to be higher than at unshared jobs but see no statistically signi?cant di'erence for daughters. Much of the earnings differential is associated with jobs at shared employers being in higher-paying industries. When we control for employer characteristics, we see a much smaller son earnings premium for working together with his father. We also investigate the impact of sharing an employer on intergenerational mobility and demonstrate that for sons, sharing an employer at some point before age 30 is associated with a higher rank in the earnings distribution as an adult but that this association is independent of the father's rank in the earnings distribution.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Distributional Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2018-02

    States and localities are increasingly experimenting with higher minimum wages in response to rising income inequality and stagnant economic mobility, but commonly used public datasets offer limited opportunities to evaluate the extent to which such changes affect earnings growth. We use administrative earnings data from the Social Security Administration linked to the Current Population Survey to overcome important limitations of public data and estimate effects of the minimum wage on growth incidence curves and income mobility profiles, providing insight into how cross-sectional effects of the minimum wage on earnings persist over time. Under both approaches, we find that raising the minimum wage increases earnings growth at the bottom of the distribution, and those effects persist and indeed grow in magnitude over several years. This finding is robust to a variety of specifications, including alternatives commonly used in the literature on employment effects of the minimum wage. Instrumental variables and subsample analyses indicate that geographic mobility likely contributes to the effects we identify. Extrapolating from our estimates suggests that a minimum wage increase comparable in magnitude to the increase experienced in Seattle between 2013 and 2016 would have blunted some, but not nearly all, of the worst income losses suffered at the bottom of the income distribution during the Great Recession.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Aggregating From Micro to Macro Patterns of Trade

    February 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-10

    We develop a new framework for aggregating from micro to macro patterns of trade. We derive price indexes that determine comparative advantage across countries and sectors and the aggregate cost of living. If firms and products are imperfect substitutes, we show that these price indexes depend on variety, average demand/quality and the dispersion of demand/quality-adjusted prices, and are only weakly related to standard empirical measures of average prices, thereby providing insight for elasticity puzzles. Of the cross-section (time-series) variation in comparative advantage, 50 (90) percent is accounted for by variety and average demand/quality, with average prices contributing less than 10 percent.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Estimating Unequal Gains across U.S. Consumers with Supplier Trade Data

    January 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-04

    Using supplier-level trade data, we estimate the effect on consumer welfare from changes in U.S. imports both in the aggregate and for different household income groups from 1998 to 2014. To do this, we use consumer preferences which feature non-homotheticity both within sectors and across sectors. After structurally estimating the parameters of the model, using the universe of U.S. goods imports, we construct import price indexes in which a variety is defined as a foreign establishment producing an HS10 product that is exported to the United States. We find that lower income households experienced the most import price inflation, while higher income households experienced the least import price inflation during our time period. Thus, we do not find evidence that the consumption channel has mitigated the distributional effects of trade that have occurred through the nominal income channel in the United States over the past two decades.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    The Employee Clientele of Corporate Leverage: Evidence from Personal Labor Income Diversification

    January 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-01

    Using employee job-level data, we empirically test the equilibrium matching between a firm's debt usage and its employee job risk aversion ('clientele effect'), as predicted by the existing theories. We measure job risk aversion for a firm's employees using their labor income concentration in the firm, calculated as the fraction of the employees' total personal labor income or total household labor income that is accounted for by their income from this particular firm. Using a sample of about 1,400 U.S. public firms from 1990-2008, we find a robust negative relation between leverage and employee job risk aversion, which is consistent with the clientele effect. Specifically, when a firm's existing employees have higher labor income concentration in it, the firm tends to have lower contemporaneous and future leverage. Moreover, in terms of new hires, firms with lower leverage are more likely to recruit employees with less alternative labor income. Our results continue to hold after we control for firm fixed effects, other employee characteristics such as wages, gender, age, race, and education, and managerial risk attitudes. Further, the matching between a firm's leverage and its workers' labor income concentration in it is more pronounced for firms with higher labor intensity and those in financial distress.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Capturing More Than Poverty: School Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Data and Household Income

    December 2017

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2017-09

    Educational researchers often use National School Lunch Program (NSLP) data as a proxy for student poverty. Under NSLP policy, students whose household income is less than 130 percent of the poverty line qualify for free lunch and students whose household income is between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty line qualify for reduced-price lunch. Linking school administrative records for all 8th graders in a California public school district to household-level IRS income tax data, we examine how well NSLP data capture student disadvantage. We find both that there is substantial disadvantage in household income not captured by NSLP category data, and that NSLP categories capture disadvantage on test scores above and beyond household income.
    View Full Paper PDF