CREAT: Census Research Exploration and Analysis Tool

Papers Containing Tag(s): 'Social Security Administration'

The following papers contain search terms that you selected. From the papers listed below, you can navigate to the PDF, the profile page for that working paper, or see all the working papers written by an author. You can also explore tags, keywords, and authors that occur frequently within these papers.
Click here to search again

Frequently Occurring Concepts within this Search

Internal Revenue Service - 120

Current Population Survey - 96

American Community Survey - 95

Social Security Number - 87

Protected Identification Key - 87

Census Bureau Disclosure Review Board - 85

Social Security - 79

Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics - 68

Survey of Income and Program Participation - 68

Bureau of Labor Statistics - 59

Employer Identification Numbers - 53

Center for Economic Studies - 52

Decennial Census - 50

Person Validation System - 47

National Science Foundation - 46

Disclosure Review Board - 45

Longitudinal Business Database - 40

W-2 - 38

North American Industry Classification System - 37

Ordinary Least Squares - 32

2010 Census - 32

Federal Statistical Research Data Center - 32

Business Register - 32

Research Data Center - 31

Master Address File - 30

Census Numident - 30

Person Identification Validation System - 28

Standard Industrial Classification - 28

Alfred P Sloan Foundation - 28

Detailed Earnings Records - 26

Quarterly Workforce Indicators - 24

Personally Identifiable Information - 24

Department of Housing and Urban Development - 24

National Bureau of Economic Research - 23

Service Annual Survey - 23

PSID - 22

Economic Census - 21

Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers - 21

Office of Management and Budget - 20

Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages - 20

SSA Numident - 20

Federal Reserve Bank - 20

Metropolitan Statistical Area - 20

Disability Insurance - 19

Cornell University - 19

Census Bureau Business Register - 18

Chicago Census Research Data Center - 18

Department of Labor - 17

Census Household Composition Key - 17

Unemployment Insurance - 17

ASEC - 16

County Business Patterns - 16

Standard Statistical Establishment List - 16

Business Dynamics Statistics - 15

Computer Assisted Personal Interview - 15

National Institute on Aging - 15

Longitudinal Research Database - 15

National Center for Health Statistics - 14

Housing and Urban Development - 14

Administrative Records - 14

Bureau of Economic Analysis - 14

Annual Survey of Manufactures - 14

Medicaid Services - 13

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - 13

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - 13

Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications - 13

Master Beneficiary Record - 13

Federal Insurance Contribution Act - 12

Earned Income Tax Credit - 12

NUMIDENT - 12

Adjusted Gross Income - 12

Indian Health Service - 12

Some Other Race - 12

Health and Retirement Study - 12

COVID-19 - 12

Individual Characteristics File - 12

National Opinion Research Center - 12

Small Business Administration - 12

Social and Economic Supplement - 11

Federal Reserve System - 11

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 11

Census of Manufactures - 11

Federal Tax Information - 11

Special Sworn Status - 11

CPS ASEC - 10

1940 Census - 10

Census Bureau Master Address File - 10

Local Employment Dynamics - 10

Department of Homeland Security - 10

University of Michigan - 10

International Trade Research Report - 10

Census Bureau Person Identification Validation System - 10

American Housing Survey - 10

Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research - 10

Master Earnings File - 10

DOB - 10

Summary Earnings Records - 10

Data Management System - 9

Population Estimates Program - 9

Centers for Medicare - 9

PIKed - 9

Selective Service System - 9

University of Chicago - 9

MAFID - 8

Company Organization Survey - 8

Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database - 8

Business Employment Dynamics - 8

National Academy of Sciences - 8

MAF-ARF - 8

Citizenship and Immigration Services - 8

Social Security Disability Insurance - 8

Social Science Research Institute - 8

Indian Housing Information Center - 8

Census Edited File - 8

Postal Service - 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - 8

American Economic Association - 8

Business Master File - 8

LEHD Program - 8

Characteristics of Business Owners - 8

Permanent Plant Number - 8

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series - 7

Employment History File - 7

Office of Personnel Management - 7

Integrated Longitudinal Business Database - 7

AKM - 7

Boston College - 7

Successor Predecessor File - 7

Workforce Information Council Administrative Wage Record Enhancement Study Group - 7

Core Based Statistical Area - 7

American Economic Review - 7

Department of Agriculture - 6

Federal Register - 6

National Institutes of Health - 6

Employer Characteristics File - 6

Cumulative Density Function - 6

Yale University - 6

Department of Economics - 6

General Accounting Office - 6

Department of Health and Human Services - 6

Stanford University - 6

Department of Justice - 6

University of Maryland - 6

Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement - 6

Harvard University - 6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - 6

Department of Defense - 6

Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Industries - 6

Stern School of Business - 6

Journal of Labor Economics - 6

Securities and Exchange Commission - 6

Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies - 6

Form W-2 - 5

Board of Governors - 5

Multiple Worksite Report - 5

Bureau of Labor - 5

Department of Education - 5

National Employer Survey - 5

Legal Form of Organization - 5

Department of State - 5

Standard Occupational Classification - 5

Herfindahl Hirschman Index - 5

Urban Institute - 5

Accommodation and Food Services - 5

Sloan Foundation - 5

National Income and Product Accounts - 5

Department of Commerce - 5

Composite Person Record - 5

CDF - 5

Census 2000 - 5

Center for Administrative Records Research - 5

American Statistical Association - 5

Minnesota Population Center - 5

Journal of Political Economy - 5

Supreme Court - 4

National Establishment Time Series - 4

NBER Summer Institute - 4

Establishment Micro Properties - 4

Survey of Consumer Finances - 4

Nonemployer Statistics - 4

University of Toronto - 4

Arts, Entertainment - 4

COVID - 4

Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews and Computer Assisted Personal Interviews - 4

CATI - 4

Pew Research Center - 4

Journal of Economic Literature - 4

New York University - 4

Employer-Household Dynamics - 4

HHS - 4

Council of Economic Advisers - 4

Russell Sage Foundation - 4

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - 4

Retail Trade - 4

Survey of Business Owners - 4

Review of Economics and Statistics - 4

Business Register Bridge - 4

Geographic Information Systems - 4

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - 4

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - 4

Boston Research Data Center - 4

Federal Emergency Management Agency - 3

Code of Federal Regulations - 3

Occupational Employment Statistics - 3

Ohio State University - 3

Total Factor Productivity - 3

Technical Services - 3

University of California Los Angeles - 3

Michigan Institute for Teaching and Research in Economics - 3

Federal Poverty Level - 3

Economic Research Service - 3

UC Berkeley - 3

New York Times - 3

General Education Development - 3

Customs and Border Protection - 3

Quarterly Journal of Economics - 3

2SLS - 3

Regression Discontinuity Design - 3

National Health Interview Survey - 3

Environmental Protection Agency - 3

Professional Services - 3

Federal Government - 3

National Research Council - 3

CAAA - 3

Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs - 3

Federal Statistical System - 3

Patent and Trademark Office - 3

North American Industry Classi - 3

Statistics Canada - 3

Kauffman Foundation - 3

WECD - 3

Public Use Micro Sample - 3

survey - 62

respondent - 52

earnings - 50

population - 50

employed - 50

employ - 49

labor - 38

recession - 37

workforce - 36

employee - 33

salary - 32

census data - 31

ethnicity - 29

census bureau - 29

data - 29

agency - 28

hispanic - 28

payroll - 26

socioeconomic - 26

data census - 26

ssa - 25

earner - 24

statistical - 24

record - 23

retirement - 22

worker - 22

estimating - 21

irs - 20

resident - 20

ethnic - 20

intergenerational - 20

economist - 20

immigrant - 20

poverty - 19

datasets - 19

unemployed - 19

family - 18

enterprise - 18

citizen - 18

federal - 17

quarterly - 16

disparity - 16

microdata - 16

disadvantaged - 15

enrollment - 15

use census - 15

minority - 15

racial - 15

medicaid - 15

race - 15

welfare - 15

earn - 15

report - 15

econometric - 15

coverage - 14

census employment - 14

census survey - 14

macroeconomic - 14

job - 14

1040 - 13

revenue - 13

census research - 13

records census - 13

assessed - 13

sector - 13

heterogeneity - 13

immigration - 13

longitudinal - 13

economic census - 13

tax - 12

imputation - 12

residence - 12

statistician - 12

survey income - 12

parent - 12

migrant - 12

occupation - 12

employment statistics - 12

incentive - 11

sampling - 11

census records - 11

census responses - 11

labor statistics - 11

matching - 11

employment earnings - 11

mobility - 11

percentile - 11

database - 11

filing - 10

mortality - 10

wealth - 10

residential - 10

establishment - 10

generation - 10

bias - 10

household surveys - 10

entrepreneurship - 10

parental - 10

company - 10

employee data - 10

estimation - 9

census use - 9

housing - 9

white - 9

linkage - 9

state - 9

pension - 9

entrepreneur - 9

insurance - 9

migration - 9

surveys censuses - 9

segregation - 9

trend - 9

disclosure - 9

linked census - 9

work census - 9

workers earnings - 9

tenure - 9

census file - 9

eligibility - 8

taxpayer - 8

schooling - 8

aggregate - 8

proprietorship - 8

disability - 8

acquisition - 8

employment data - 8

industrial - 8

sale - 7

organizational - 7

researcher - 7

yearly - 7

adoption - 7

department - 7

graduate - 7

entrepreneurial - 7

proprietor - 7

cohort - 7

adulthood - 7

recessionary - 7

survey data - 7

citizenship - 7

compensation - 7

demography - 7

aging - 7

poorer - 7

expenditure - 7

saving - 7

research census - 7

census household - 7

race census - 7

medicare - 7

retiree - 7

assessing - 7

discrimination - 7

employment wages - 7

employing - 7

merger - 7

manufacturing - 7

eligible - 6

average - 6

educated - 6

neighborhood - 6

analysis - 6

study - 6

research - 6

residing - 6

career - 6

incorporated - 6

benefit - 6

2010 census - 6

earnings employees - 6

layoff - 6

marriage - 6

divorced - 6

relocation - 6

shift - 6

hire - 6

income survey - 6

income data - 6

dependent - 6

gdp - 6

endogeneity - 6

hiring - 6

firms census - 6

information census - 6

associate - 6

fertility - 6

matched - 6

information - 6

venture - 6

employment dynamics - 6

black - 6

earnings workers - 6

earnings age - 6

earnings mobility - 6

clerical - 6

censuses surveys - 6

child - 5

estimates census - 5

available census - 5

parents income - 5

postsecondary - 5

propensity - 5

estimator - 5

sample - 5

population survey - 5

wage earnings - 5

prevalence - 5

migrating - 5

reside - 5

survey households - 5

census linked - 5

pandemic - 5

mexican - 5

income year - 5

women earnings - 5

discrepancy - 5

employer household - 5

longitudinal employer - 5

employment trends - 5

accounting - 5

business data - 5

census years - 5

earnings inequality - 5

employment measures - 5

wage data - 5

identifier - 5

production - 5

filed - 4

woman - 4

education - 4

spouse - 4

renter - 4

homeowner - 4

income households - 4

employment count - 4

individuals census - 4

estimates intergenerational - 4

latino - 4

labor markets - 4

wage gap - 4

effects employment - 4

employment effects - 4

sociology - 4

migrate - 4

geographic - 4

provided census - 4

income children - 4

income white - 4

decade - 4

volatility - 4

birth - 4

impact - 4

census 2020 - 4

couple - 4

regional - 4

turnover - 4

warehousing - 4

worker demographics - 4

workforce indicators - 4

employment estimates - 4

unemployment rates - 4

census business - 4

ancestry - 4

health - 4

industry employment - 4

classified - 4

native - 4

workplace - 4

metropolitan - 4

confidentiality - 4

corporation - 4

ownership - 4

earns - 4

financial - 4

growth - 4

employment entrepreneurship - 4

uninsured - 4

insured - 4

aggregation - 4

rural - 3

gender - 3

sample census - 3

home - 3

household income - 3

mortgage - 3

market - 3

establishments data - 3

grandparent - 3

adopt - 3

college - 3

degree - 3

nonemployer businesses - 3

death - 3

outcome - 3

asian - 3

effect wages - 3

crime - 3

earnings gap - 3

investment - 3

profit - 3

rent - 3

agriculture - 3

geographically - 3

economically - 3

declining - 3

decline - 3

immigrated - 3

segregated - 3

income individuals - 3

recession exposure - 3

poor - 3

maternal - 3

funding - 3

social - 3

privacy - 3

public - 3

census estimates - 3

distribution - 3

bankruptcy - 3

fiscal - 3

export - 3

estimates employment - 3

recession employment - 3

unemployment insurance - 3

neighbor - 3

employed census - 3

wage changes - 3

earnings growth - 3

wage regressions - 3

owner - 3

business owners - 3

owned businesses - 3

produce - 3

founder - 3

enrollee - 3

www census - 3

statistical agencies - 3

partnership - 3

worker wages - 3

insurance employer - 3

regression - 3

employment growth - 3

Viewing papers 91 through 100 of 200


  • Working Paper

    Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics (NES-D): Exploring Longitudinal Consistency and Sub-national Estimates

    December 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-34

    Until recently, the quinquennial Survey of Business Owners (SBO) was the only source of information for U.S. employer and nonemployer businesses by owner demographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity, sex and veteran status. Now, however, the Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics series (NES-D) will replace the SBO's nonemployer component with reliable, and more frequent (annual) business demographic estimates with no additional respondent burden, and at lower imputation rates and costs. NES-D is not a survey; rather, it exploits existing administrative and census records to assign demographic characteristics to the universe of approximately 25 million (as of 2016) nonemployer businesses. Although only in the second year of its research phase, NES-D is rapidly moving towards production, with a planned prototype or experimental version release of 2017 nonemployer data in 2020, followed by annual releases of the series. After the first year of research, we released a working paper (Luque et al., 2019) that assessed the viability of estimating nonemployer demographics exclusively with administrative records (AR) and census data. That paper used one year of data (2015) to produce preliminary tabulations of business counts at the national level. This year we expand that research in multiple ways by: i) examining the longitudinal consistency of administrative and census records coverage, and of our AR-based demographics estimates, ii) evaluating further coverage from additional data sources, iii) exploring estimates at the sub-national level, iv) exploring estimates by industrial sector, v) examining demographics estimates of business receipts as well as of counts, and vi) implementing imputation of missing demographic values. Our current results are consistent with the main findings in Luque et al. (2019), and show that high coverage and demographic assignment rates are not the exception, but the norm. Specifically, we find that AR coverage rates are high and stable over time for each of the three years we examine, 2014-2016. We are able to identify owners for approximately 99 percent of nonemployer businesses (excluding C-corporations), 92 to 93 percent of identified nonemployer owners have no missing demographics, and only about 1 percent are missing three or more demographic characteristics in each of the three years. We also find that our demographics estimates are stable over time, with expected small annual changes that are consistent with underlying population trends in the U.S.. Due to data limitations, these results do not include C-corporations, which represent only 2 percent of nonemployer businesses and 4 percent of receipts. Without added respondent burden and at lower imputation rates and costs, NES-D will provide high-quality business demographics estimates at a higher frequency (annual vs. every 5 years) than the SBO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    A Task-based Approach to Constructing Occupational Categories with Implications for Empirical Research in Labor Economics

    September 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-27

    Most applied research in labor economics that examines returns to worker skills or differences in earnings across subgroups of workers typically accounts for the role of occupations by controlling for occupational categories. Researchers often aggregate detailed occupations into categories based on the Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) coding scheme, which is based largely on narratives or qualitative measures of workers' tasks. Alternatively, we propose two quantitative task-based approaches to constructing occupational categories by using factor analysis with O*NET job descriptors that provide a rich set of continuous measures of job tasks across all occupations. We find that our task-based approach outperforms the SOC-based approach in terms of lower occupation distance measures. We show that our task-based approach provides an intuitive, nuanced interpretation for grouping occupations and permits quantitative assessments of similarities in task compositions across occupations. We also replicate a recent analysis and find that our task-based occupational categories explain more of the gender wage gap than the SOC-based approaches explain. Our study enhances the Federal Statistical System's understanding of the SOC codes, investigates ways to use third-party data to construct useful research variables that can potentially be added to Census Bureau data products to improve their quality and versatility, and sheds light on how the use of alternative occupational categories in economics research may lead to different empirical results and deeper understanding in the analysis of labor market outcomes.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Predicting the Effect of Adding a Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census

    June 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-18

    The addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census could affect the self-response rate, a key driver of the cost and quality of a census. We find that citizenship question response patterns in the American Community Survey (ACS) suggest that it is a sensitive question when asked about administrative record noncitizens but not when asked about administrative record citizens. ACS respondents who were administrative record noncitizens in 2017 frequently choose to skip the question or answer that the person is a citizen. We predict the effect on self-response to the entire survey by comparing mail response rates in the 2010 ACS, which included a citizenship question, with those of the 2010 census, which did not have a citizenship question, among households in both surveys. We compare the actual ACS-census difference in response rates for households that may contain noncitizens (more sensitive to the question) with the difference for households containing only U.S. citizens. We estimate that the addition of a citizenship question will have an 8.0 percentage point larger effect on self-response rates in households that may have noncitizens relative to those with only U.S. citizens. Assuming that the citizenship question does not affect unit self-response in all-citizen households and applying the 8.0 percentage point drop to the 28.1 % of housing units potentially having at least one noncitizen would predict an overall 2.2 percentage point drop in self-response in the 2020 census, increasing costs and reducing the quality of the population count.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Immigrants' Earnings Growth and Return Migration from the U.S.: Examining their Determinants using Linked Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-10

    Using a novel panel data set of recent immigrants to the U.S. (2005-2007) from individual-level linked U.S. Census Bureau survey data and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administrative records, we identify the determinants of return migration and earnings growth for this immigrant arrival cohort. We show that by 10 years after arrival almost 40 percent have return migrated. Our analysis examines these flows by educational attainment, country of birth, and English language ability separately for each gender. We show, for the first time, that return migrants experience downward earnings mobility over two to three years prior to their return migration. This finding suggests that economic shocks are closely related to emigration decisions; time-variant unobserved characteristics may be more important in determining out-migration than previously known. We also show that wage assimilation with native-born populations occurs fairly quickly; after 10 years there is strong convergence in earnings by several characteristics. Finally, we confirm that the use of stock-based panel data lead to estimates of slower earnings growth than is found using repeated cross-section data. However, we also show, using selection-correction methods in our panel data, that stock-based panel data may understate the rate of earnings growth for the initial immigrant arrival cohort when emigration is not accounted for.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Optimal Probabilistic Record Linkage: Best Practice for Linking Employers in Survey and Administrative Data

    March 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-08

    This paper illustrates an application of record linkage between a household-level survey and an establishment-level frame in the absence of unique identifiers. Linkage between frames in this setting is challenging because the distribution of employment across firms is highly asymmetric. To address these difficulties, this paper uses a supervised machine learning model to probabilistically link survey respondents in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with employers and establishments in the Census Business Register (BR) to create a new data source which we call the CenHRS. Multiple imputation is used to propagate uncertainty from the linkage step into subsequent analyses of the linked data. The linked data reveal new evidence that survey respondents' misreporting and selective nonresponse about employer characteristics are systematically correlated with wages.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity in the United States: New Evidence from Worker-Firm Linked Data

    February 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-07

    This paper examines the extent and consequences of Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity (DNWR) using administrative worker-firm linked data from the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) program for a large representative U.S. state. Prior to the Great Recession, only 7-8% of job stayers are paid the same nominal hourly wage rate as one year earlier - substantially less than previously found in survey-based data - and about 20% of job stayers experience a wage cut. During the Great Recession, the incidence of wage cuts increases to 30%, followed by a large rise in the proportion of wage freezes to 16% as the economy recovers. Total earnings of job stayers exhibit even fewer zero changes and a larger incidence of reductions than hourly wage rates, due to systematic variations in hours worked. The results are consistent with concurrent findings in the literature that reductions in base pay are exceedingly rare but that firms use different forms of non-base pay and variations in hours worked to flexibilize labor cost. We then exploit the worker-firm link of the LEHD and find that during the Great Recession, firms with indicators of DNWR reduced employment by about 1.2% more per year. This negative effect is driven by significantly lower hiring rates and persists into the recovery. Our results suggest that despite the relatively large incidence of wage cuts in the aggregate, DNWR has sizable allocative consequences.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics (NES-D): Using Administrative and Census Records Data in Business Statistics

    January 2019

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-19-01

    The quinquennial Survey of Business Owners or SBO provided the only comprehensive source of information in the United States on employer and nonemployer businesses by the sex, race, ethnicity and veteran status of the business owners. The annual Nonemployer Statistics series (NES) provides establishment counts and receipts for nonemployers but contains no demographic information on the business owners. With the transition of the employer component of the SBO to the Annual Business Survey, the Nonemployer Statistics by Demographics series or NES-D represents the continuation of demographics estimates for nonemployer businesses. NES-D will leverage existing administrative and census records to assign demographic characteristics to the universe of approximately 24 million nonemployer businesses (as of 2015). Demographic characteristics include key demographics measured by the SBO (sex, race, Hispanic origin and veteran status) as well as other demographics (age, place of birth and citizenship status) collected but not imputed by the SBO if missing. A spectrum of administrative and census data sources will provide the nonemployer universe and demographics information. Specifically, the nonemployer universe originates in the Business Register; the Census Numident will provide sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status; race and Hispanic origin information will be obtained from multiple years of the decennial census and the American Community Survey; and the Department of Veteran Affairs will provide administrative records data on veteran status. The use of blended data in this manner will make possible the production of NES-D, an annual series that will become the only source of detailed and comprehensive statistics on the scope, nature and activities of U.S. businesses with no paid employment by the demographic characteristics of the business owner. Using the 2015 vintage of nonemployers, initial results indicate that demographic information is available for the overwhelming majority of the universe of nonemployers. For instance, information on sex, age, place of birth and citizenship status is available for over 95 percent of the 24 million nonemployers while race and Hispanic origin are available for about 90 percent of them. These results exclude owners of C-corporations, which represent only 2 percent of nonemployer firms. Among other things, future work will entail imputation of missing demographics information (including that of C-corporations), testing the longitudinal consistency of the estimates, and expanding the set of characteristics beyond the demographics mentioned above. Without added respondent burden and at lower imputation rates and costs, NES-D will meet the needs of stakeholders as well as the economy as a whole by providing reliable estimates at a higher frequency (annual vs. every 5 years) and with a more timely dissemination schedule than the SBO.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    LEHD Infrastructure S2014 files in the FSRDC

    September 2018

    Authors: Lars Vilhuber

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-27R

    The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau, with the support of several national research agencies, maintains a set of infrastructure files using administrative data provided by state agencies, enhanced with information from other administrative data sources, demographic and economic (business) surveys and censuses. The LEHD Infrastructure Files provide a detailed and comprehensive picture of workers, employers, and their interaction in the U.S. economy. This document describes the structure and content of the 2014 Snapshot of the LEHD Infrastructure files as they are made available in the Census Bureau's secure and restricted-access Research Data Center network. The document attempts to provide a comprehensive description of all researcher-accessible files, of their creation, and of any modifications made to the files to facilitate researcher access.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Labor Market Concentration, Earnings Inequality, and Earnings Mobility

    September 2018

    Authors: Kevin Rinz

    Working Paper Number:

    carra-2018-10

    Using data from the Longitudinal Business Database and Form W-2, I document trends in local industrial concentration from 1976 through 2015 and estimate the effects of that concentration on earnings outcomes within and across demographic groups. Local industrial concentration has generally been declining throughout its distribution over that period, unlike national industrial concentration, which declined sharply in the early 1980s before increasing steadily to nearly its original level beginning around 1990. Estimates indicate that increased local concentration reduces earnings and increases inequality, but observed changes in concentration have been in the opposite direction, and the magnitude of these effects has been modest relative to broader trends; back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that the 90/10 earnings ratio was about six percent lower and earnings were about one percent higher in 2015 than they would have been if local concentration were at its 1976 level. Within demographic subgroups, most experience mean earnings reductions and all experience increases in inequality. Estimates of the effects of concentration on earnings mobility are sensitive to specification.
    View Full Paper PDF
  • Working Paper

    Understanding the Quality of Alternative Citizenship Data Sources for the 2020 Census

    August 2018

    Working Paper Number:

    CES-18-38R

    This paper examines the quality of citizenship data in self-reported survey responses compared to administrative records and evaluates options for constructing an accurate count of resident U.S. citizens. Person-level discrepancies between survey-collected citizenship data and administrative records are more pervasive than previously reported in studies comparing survey and administrative data aggregates. Our results imply that survey-sourced citizenship data produce significantly lower estimates of the noncitizen share of the population than would be produced from currently available administrative records; both the survey-sourced and administrative data have shortcomings that could contribute to this difference. Our evidence is consistent with noncitizen respondents misreporting their own citizenship status and failing to report that of other household members. At the same time, currently available administrative records may miss some naturalizations and capture others with a delay. The evidence in this paper also suggests that adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census would lead to lower self-response rates in households potentially containing noncitizens, resulting in higher fieldwork costs and a lower-quality population count.
    View Full Paper PDF